Evaluation of Reperfusion Pulmonary Edema by Extravascular Lung Water Measurements After Pulmonary Endarterectomy:

Perioperative Management in Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PH), provided lesions are proximal enough in the pulmonary vasculature to be surgically accessible and the patient is well enough to benefit from the operation in the longer term. It is a major cardiothoracic operation, requiring specialized techniques and instruments developed over several decades to access and dissect out the intra-arterial fibrotic material. While in-hospital operative mortality is low (<5%), particularly in high-volume centers, careful perioperative management in the operating theater and intensive care is mandatory to balance ventricular performance, fluid balance, ventilation, and coagulation to avoid or treat complications. Reperfusion pulmonary edema, airway hemorrhage, and right ventricular failure are the most problematic complications, often requiring the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to bridge to recovery. Successful PEA has been shown to improve both morbidity and mortality in large registries, with survival >70% at 10 years. For patients not suitable for PEA or with residual PH after PEA, balloon pulmonary angioplasty and/or PH medical therapy may prove beneficial. Here, we describe the indications for PEA, specific surgical and perioperative strategies, postoperative monitoring and management, and approaches for managing residual PH in the long term.

Different response of the oxygen pathway in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with pulmonary endarterectomy versus balloon pulmonary angioplasty

Background

Oxygen pathway limitation exists in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are two effective interventions for CTEPH, but their effects and comparison of these two interventions on the oxygen pathway are not well demonstrated.

Methods

CTEPH patients with available pulmonary function test, hemodynamics, and blood gas analysis before and after the interventions were included for comparison of oxygen pathway in terms of lung ventilation, lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and oxygen extraction between these two interventions.

Results

The change in the percentage of the predicted forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (−3.4 ± 12.7 vs. 3.8 ± 8.7%, P = 0.006) and forced vital capacity (−5.5 ± 13.0 vs. 4.2 ± 9.9%, P = 0.001) among the PEA group (n = 24) and BPA group (n = 46) were significantly different. Patients in the PEA group had a significant increase in their arterial oxygen saturation (from 92.5 ± 3.6 to 94.6 ± 2.4%, P = 0.022), while those in the BPA group had no change, which could be explained by a significant improvement in ventilation/perfusion (−0.48 ± 0.53 vs. −0.17 ± 0.41, P = 0.016). Compared with patients post-BPA, patients post-PEA were characterized by higher oxygen delivery (756.3 ± 229.1 vs. 628.8 ± 188.5 ml/min, P = 0.016) and higher oxygen extraction (203.3 ± 64.8 vs. 151.2 ± 31.9 ml/min, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Partial amelioration of the oxygen pathway limitations could be achieved in CTEPH patients treated with PEA and BPA. CTEPH patients post-PEA had better performance in lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and extraction, while those post-BPA had better lung ventilation. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation may assist in improving the impairment of the oxygen pathway.

Transpulmonary thermodilution techniques in the haemodynamically unstable patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) devices invasively measure not only cardiac output but also several other haemodynamic variables estimating cardiac preload, cardiac preload, systolic function, the lung oedema and systolic function, the lung oedema and the pulmonary permeability. In light of the recent literature, we describe how different indices are measured, emphasize their clinical interest and list potential limits and side-effects of the technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Estimation of cardiac output measurement with TPTD is now well established, at least when compared with the pulmonary artery catheter. The advantage of calibrating the pulse contour analysis, as it is allowed by TPTD indices, is clearly established over uncalibrated devices. The greatest advantage of TPTD is to measure extravascular lung water and pulmonary permeability, which may be useful to diagnose acute respiratory distress syndrome and manage fluid therapy in various critical diseases. It also allows a rapid detection of left ventricular systolic failure. The information it provides must be considered complementary to that provided by echocardiography.

SUMMARY

TPTD provides several indices that may help in making decisions during the therapeutic management of haemodynamically unstable patients. It should be used for the most critically ill patients, whose management requires a reliable, precise and holistic view of the cardiopulmonary condition.

Imaging findings of pulmonary edema: Part 2. Infrequent or unusual pulmonary edema with definitive imaging findings

Pulmonary edema is a common condition with numerous causes, some of which are infrequently encountered. This review article describes various uncommon conditions/disease that are associated with pulmonary edema and which show characteristic imaging findings on chest computed tomography or other imaging modality. Thus, this review reflects the variety of factors involved in this frequently encountered condition. We demonstrate the wide range of situations that lead to the development of pulmonary edema by showing the imaging findings of unique cases. These rare varieties of pulmonary edema have distinctive imaging and clinical features that aid in providing an accurate diagnosis.

Measurement of extravascular lung water to diagnose severe reperfusion lung injury following pulmonary endarterectomy: a prospective cohort clinical validation study

The measurement of extravascular lung water is a relatively new technology which has not yet been well validated as a clinically useful tool. We studied its utility in patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy as they frequently suffer reperfusion lung injury and associated oedematous lungs. Such patients are therefore ideal for evaluating this new monitor. We performed a prospective observational cohort study during which extravascular lung water index measurements were taken before and immediately after surgery and postoperatively in intensive care. Data were analysed for 57 patients; 21 patients (37%) experienced severe reperfusion lung injury. The first extravascular lung water index measurement after cardiopulmonary bypass failed to predict severe reperfusion lung injury, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.59 (95%CI 0.44–0.74). On intensive care, extravascular lung water index correlated most strongly at 36 h, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.90 (95%CI 0.80–1.00). Peri‐operative extravascular lung water index is not a useful measure to predict severe reperfusion lung injury after pulmonary endarterectomy, however, it does allow monitoring and measurement during the postoperative period. This study implies that extravascular lung water index can be used to directly assess pulmonary fluid overload and that monitoring patients by measuring extravascular lung water index during their intensive care stay is useful and correlates with their clinical course. This may allow directed, pre‐empted therapy to attenuate the effects and improve patient outcomes and should prompt further studies.

Involvement of pulmonary arteriopathy in the development and severity of reperfusion pulmonary edema after pulmonary endarterectomy

Reperfusion pulmonary edema (RPE) is a common complication after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, the precise mechanisms underlying the development of RPE remain unclear. To evaluate the effects of pulmonary vasculopathy on RPE, the severity of the pulmonary arteriopathies and venopathies of lung tissues biopsied during PEA were pathologically quantified in 33 CTEPH patients. The severity of RPE was classified from grade 0 (no RPE) to 4 (death due to RPE) based on the arterial oxygen tension/inspiratory oxygen fraction (P/F ratio) and necessity of respiratory management. Among the 33 patients (27 women; mean age = 63.3 years), 17 (51.5%) patients developed RPE. The severity of pulmonary arteriopathy (obstruction ratio) correlated with the grade of RPE (r = 0.576, P = 0.0005). The obstruction ratio also correlated with the P/F ratio (r = −0.543, P = 0.001) and the perioperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.445, P = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the obstruction ratio was a significant independent determinant for the development of RPE (odds ratio = 15.7; 95% confidence interval = 2.29–108.00, P = 0.005). In conclusion, pulmonary arteriopathy could be a determinant of the development and severity of RPE after PEA.

Critical Care of Patients After Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) remains the only curative surgery for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Postoperative intensive care unit care challenges providers with unique disease physiology, operative sequelae, and the potential for detrimental complications. Central concerns in patients with CTEPH immediately after PTE relate to neurologic, pulmonary, hemodynamic, and hematologic aspects. Institutional experience in critical care for the CTEPH population, a multidisciplinary team approach, patient risk assessment, and integration of current concepts in critical care determine outcomes after PTE surgery. In this review, the authors will focus on specific aspects unique to this population, with integration of current available evidence and future directions. The goal of this review is to provide the cardiac anesthesiologist and intensivist with a comprehensive understanding of postoperative physiology, potential complications, and contemporary intensive care unit management immediately after pulmonary endarterectomy.

Extravascular lung water measurements in acute respiratory distress syndrome: why, how, and when?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increase in pulmonary vascular permeability accompanied with accumulation of excess extravascular lung water (EVLW) is the hallmark of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Currently, EVLW and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) can be quantitatively measured using the transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique. We will clarify why, how, and when EVLW and PVPI measurements should be performed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the Berlin criteria of ARDS are simple and widely used, several criticisms of them have been published. The last 2 decades have witnessed the introduction and evolution of the TPTD technique for measuring EVLW and PVPI. Several publications have recommended to evaluate EVLW and the PVPI during the treatment of critically ill patients. Accurate and objective diagnoses can be made for ARDS patients using EVLW and PVPI. EVLW more than 10 ml/kg is a reasonable criterion for pulmonary edema, and EVLW more than 15 ml/kg for a severe condition. In addition to EVLW more than 10 mL/kg, PVPI more than three suggests increased vascular permeability (i.e., ARDS), and PVPI less than 2 represent normal vascular permeability (i.e., cardiogenic pulmonary edema).

SUMMARY

EVLW and PVPI measurement will open the door to future ARDS clinical practice and research, and have potential to be included in the future ARDS definition.