Definitive Chemoradiation With Full-dose Gemcitabine for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Efficacy of Involved-Field Radiotherapy

p38β (MAPK11) mediates gemcitabine-associated radiosensitivity in sarcoma experimental models

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is an antitumour agent currently used in the treatment of several types of cancer with known properties as a radiosensitizer. p38MAPK signalling pathway has been shown to be a major determinant in the cellular response to gemcitabine in different experimental models. However, the molecular mechanism implicated in gemcitabine-associated radiosensitivity remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The human sarcoma cell lines A673 and HT1080, and a mouse cell line derived from a 3-methylcholanthrene induced sarcoma were used as experimental models. Modulation of p38MAPKs was performed by pharmacological approaches (SB203580) and genetic interference using lentiviral vectors coding for specific shRNAs. Viability was assessed by MTT. Gene expression was evaluated by western blot and RT-qPCR. Induction of apoptosis was monitored by caspase 3/7 activity. Response to ionizing radiation was evaluated by clonogenic assays.

RESULTS

Our data demonstrate that chemical inhibition of p38MAPK signalling pathway blocks gemcitabine radiosensitizing potential. Genetic interference of MAPK14 (p38α), the most abundantly expressed and best characterized p38MAPK, despite promoting resistance to gemcitabine, it does not affect its radiosensitizing potential. Interestingly, specific knockdown of MAPK11 (p38β) induces a total loss of the radiosensitivity associated to gemcitabine, as well as a marked increase in the resistance to the drug.

CONCLUSION

The present work identifies p38β as a major determinant of the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine without implication of p38α, suggesting that p38β status should be analysed in those cases in which gemcitabine is combined with ionizing radiation.

Methodological Development of Combination Drug and Radiotherapy in Basic and Clinical Research

Newer technical improvements in radiation oncology have been rapidly implemented in recent decades, allowing an improved therapeutic ratio. The development of strategies using local and systemic treatments concurrently, mainly targeted therapies, has however plateaued. Targeted molecular compounds and immunotherapy are increasingly being incorporated as the new standard of care for a wide array of cancers. A better understanding of possible prior methodology issues is therefore required and should be integrated into upcoming early clinical trials including individualized radiotherapy-drug combinations. The outcome of clinical trials is influenced by the validity of the preclinical proofs of concept, the impact on normal tissue, the robustness of biomarkers and the quality of the delivery of radiation. Herein, key methodological aspects are discussed with the aim of optimizing the design and implementation of future precision drug-radiotherapy trials.

Late DNA Damage Mediated by Homologous Recombination Repair Results in Radiosensitization with Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine (dFdCyd) shows broad antitumor activity in solid tumors in chemotherapeutic regimens or when combined with ionizing radiation (radiosensitization). While it is known that mismatches in DNA are necessary for dFdCyd radiosensitization, the critical event resulting in radiosensitization has not been identified. Here we hypothesized that late DNA damage (≥24 h after drug washout/irradiation) is a causal event in radiosensitization by dFdCyd, and that homologous recombination repair (HRR) is required for this late DNA damage. Using γ-H2AX as a measurement of DNA damage in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, we demonstrate that 10 or 80 nM dFdCyd alone produced significantly more late DNA damage compared to that observed within 4 h after treatment. The combination of dFdCyd treatment followed by irradiation did not produce a consistent increase in DNA damage in the first 4 h after treatment, however, there was a synergistic increase 24-48 h later relative to treatment with dFdCyd or radiation alone. RNAi suppression of the essential HRR protein, XRCC3, significantly decreased both radiosensitization and late DNA damage. Furthermore, inhibition of HRR with the Rad51 inhibitor B02 prevented radiosensitization when added after, but not during, treatment with dFdCyd and radiation. To our knowledge, this is the first published study to show that radiosensitization with dFdCyd results from a synergistic increase in DNA damage at 24-48 h after drug and radiation treatment, and that this damage and radiosensitization require HRR. These results suggest that tumors that overexpress HRR will be more vulnerable to chemoradiotherapy, and treatments that increase HRR and/or mismatches in DNA will enhance dFdCyd radiosensitization.