Results of a phase I trial of 12 patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma combining gefitinib, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation: report of toxicity and evaluation of circulating K-ras as a potential biomarker of response to therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32:115-121. [PMID: 19307945 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318180baa3]

Circulating tumor DNA: a help to guide therapeutic strategy in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

prognostic biomarkers could be useful to better select patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and/or secondary resection.

AIMS

The main objective of this work was to study characteristics, received treatments and prognostic of patients with BR or LA PA according to their baseline circulating tumor DNA status and, for secondary objective, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR).

METHODS

ctDNA status at baseline was determined using Next Generation Sequencing in a consecutive monocentric cohort of patients with a BR or LA PA.

RESULTS

69 patients were included, 31 with BR PA and 38 with LA PA. 14 (20.3%) patients had baseline positive ctDNA. Five (7.8%) patients had NLR> 5. Patients with positive ctDNA had 3.7 months shorter progression free survival (p = 0.006). Patients with positive ctDNA had earlier progression after the beginning of CRT (4.4 vs 7.1 months; p = 0.068) and shorter relapse free survival after secondary resection (9.2 vs 22.9 months; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

positive ctDNA at baseline was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with BR or LA PA. These data are exploratory and must be confirmed in further prospective trials.

Successes and Failures of Combined Modalities in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies: New Directions

Upper gastrointestinal malignancies generally have moderate to poor cure rates, even in the earliest stages, thereby implying that both local and systemic treatments have room for improvement. Therapeutic options are broadening, however, with the development of new immunotherapies and targeted agents, which can have synergistic effects with radiotherapy. Here we discuss the current state of combined modality therapy for upper gastrointestinal malignancies, specifically recent successes and setbacks in trials of radiation therapy with targeted therapies, vaccines, immunotherapies, and chemotherapies.

Targeted agents in GI radiotherapy: Clinical efficacy and side effects

Approximately 50% of all patients with cancer receive radiotherapy (RT) at some point during their treatment. Despite the advent of modern imaging and advances in planning and delivering highly-conformal and precise RT, further dose escalation to improve clinical outcome is often limited by the potential side-effects to adjacent tissues. Addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (CRT) has led to significant clinical improvements in many gastrointestinal malignancies but at the expense of increased toxicity as most chemotherapy drugs lack specificity. Targeted agents modulate specific biological pathways and can potentially enhance RT efficacy. However, so far, the majority of clinical studies incorporating targeted agents into RT and CRT have produced disappointing results in gastrointestinal malignancies. Also, we lack validated biomarkers and methods for monitoring and predicting the efficacy of these agents when combined with RT/CRT. In the present article, we will review the most important targeted therapies, and examine the efficacy and toxicity of these agents when combined with RT/CRT in gastrointestinal malignancies. The shortcomings as well as future challenges and perspectives for the successful use of these compounds with RT/CRT in future trials will also be outlined.

Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most frequent pancreatic cancer type and is characterized by a dismal prognosis due to late diagnosis, local tumor invasion, frequent distant metastases and poor sensitivity to current therapy. In this context, circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA constitute easily accessible blood-borne tumor biomarkers that may prove their clinical interest for screening, early diagnosis and metastatic risk assessment of PDAC. Moreover these markers represent a tool to assess PDAC mutational landscape. In this review, together with key biological findings, we summarize the clinical results obtained using "liquid biopsies" at the different stages of the disease, for early and metastatic diagnosis as well as monitoring during therapy.

Clinical effects of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine in treatment of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effects of stereotactic conformal radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS: A total of 118 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were divided into two groups to receive either radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine (group A, 56 cases) or radiotherapy alone (group B, 62 cases). The standard dose of stereotactic conformal radiotherapy prescribed was 35-45 Gy to the 50%-65% isodose curve. The total dose was delivered over 10-13 d with a fraction dose of 2.8-3.5 Gy and 6 fractions per week. Concomitant chemotherapy started at the first day of radiotherapy: gemcitabine at a dose of 600 mg/m² was given on days 1 and 8, and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered three weeks after radiotherapy at a dose of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, 21 days per cycle, for 4-6 cycles continuously.

RESULTS: The patients underwent CT or MR examination 2 mo after 2 treatment. The tumor response rate of group A was 67.8% (38/56). Median survival time was 12.8 mo (range, 4-70 mo). The overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 58.9% (33/56) and 28.6% (16/56), respectively. Main side effects included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting. The tumor response rate of group B was 30.6% (19/62). Median survival time was 8.5 mo (range, 5-56 mo). The overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 33.9% (21/66) and 12.9% (8/62), respectively. Main side effects were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Both the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects were better in the combination group than in the radiotherapy alone group.

CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine combined with stereotactic conformal radiotherapy is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Emerging opportunities for the combination of molecularly targeted drugs with radiotherapy

Recent drug discovery developments in the field of small molecule targeted agents have led to much interest in combining these with radiotherapy. There are good preclinical data to suggest this approach worthy of investigation and in this review we discuss how this has translated into recent clinical trials. The outcome of clinical trials investigating radiotherapy/targeted drug combinations published in the last 5 years is discussed, as are trials in progress. The perceived future opportunities and challenges in the development of this exciting area are considered.

Design and conduct of early-phase radiotherapy trials with targeted therapeutics: lessons from the PRAVO experience

New strategies to facilitate the improvement of physical and integrated biological optimization of high-precision treatment protocols are an important priority for modern radiation oncology. From a clinical perspective, as knowledge accumulates from molecular radiobiology, there is a complex and exciting opportunity to investigate novel approaches to rational patient treatment stratification based on actionable tumor targets, together with the appropriate design of next-generation early-phase radiotherapy trials utilizing targeted therapeutics, to formally evaluate relevant clinical and biomarker endpoints. A unique aspect in the development pathway of systemic agents with presumed radiosensitizing activity will also be the need for special attention on patient eligibility and the rigorous definition of radiation dose-volume relationships and potential dose-limiting toxicities. Based on recent experience from systematically investigating histone deacetylase inhibitors as radiosensitizing agents, from initial studies in preclinical tumor models through the conduct of a phase I clinical study to evaluate tumor activity of the targeted agent as well as patient safety and tumor response to the combined treatment modality, this communication will summarize principles relating to early clinical evaluation of combining radiotherapy and targeted therapeutics.

Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer

Serum CA 19-9 is the only FDA approved biomarker recommended for use in the routine management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Over 2,000 biomarker studies related to pancreatic cancer appear in the literature, highlighting the need to discover and develop improved tests. Diagnostic biomarkers have implications for early detection of PDA, prognostic markers predict patient survival and recurrence patterns, and predictive markers can help personalize treatment regimens.

Radiotherapy and "new" drugs-new side effects?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Targeted drugs have augmented the cancer treatment armamentarium. Based on the molecular specificity, it was initially believed that these drugs had significantly less side effects. However, currently it is accepted that all of these agents have their specific side effects. Based on the given multimodal approach, special emphasis has to be placed on putative interactions of conventional cytostatic drugs, targeted agents and other modalities. The interaction of targeted drugs with radiation harbours special risks, since the awareness for interactions and even synergistic toxicities is lacking. At present, only limited is data available regarding combinations of targeted drugs and radiotherapy. This review gives an overview on the current knowledge on such combined treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the following MESH headings and combinations of these terms pubmed database was searched: Radiotherapy AND cetuximab/trastuzumab/panitumumab/nimotuzumab, bevacizumab, sunitinib/sorafenib/lapatinib/gefitinib/erlotinib/sirolimus, thalidomide/lenalidomide as well as erythropoietin. For citation crosscheck the ISI web of science database was used employing the same search terms.

RESULTS

Several classes of targeted substances may be distinguished: Small molecules including kinase inhibitors and specific inhibitors, antibodies, and anti-angiogenic agents. Combination of these agents with radiotherapy may lead to specific toxicities or negatively influence the efficacy of RT. Though there is only little information on the interaction of molecular targeted radiation and radiotherapy in clinical settings, several critical incidents are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of molecular targeted drugs to conventional radiotherapy outside of approved regimens or clinical trials warrants a careful consideration especially when used in conjunction in hypo-fractionated regimens. Clinical trials are urgently needed in order to address the open question in regard to efficacy, early and late toxicity.

Current status and future potential of somatic mutation testing from circulating free DNA in patients with solid tumours

Genetic alterations can determine the natural history of cancer and its treatment response. With further advances in DNA sequencing technology, multiple novel genetic alterations will be discovered which could be exploited as prognostic, predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in the development and use of cancer therapeutics. As such, the importance in clinical practice of efficient and robust somatic mutation testing in solid tumours cannot be overemphasized in the current era of personalized medicine. However, significant challenges remain regarding the testing of genetic biomarkers in clinical practice. Reliance on archived formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tumour, obtained from diagnostic biopsies, for testing somatic genetic alterations could restrict the scientific community in asking relevant questions about a patient's cancer biology. Problems inherent with using formalin fixed, archival tissue are well recognized and difficult to resolve. It could be argued that to achieve rapid and efficient incorporation of genetic biomarkers into clinical practice, somatic mutation testing in cancer patients should be simpler, less invasive using a readily available clinical sample, whilst maintaining robustness and reproducibility. In this regard, use of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma or serum as an alternative and/or additional source of DNA to test cancer specific genetic alterations is an attractive proposition. In light of encouraging results from recent studies, this mini review will discuss the current role and future potential of somatic mutation testing from circulating or cell free DNA derived from the blood of patients with solid tumours.

PAR-4 as a possible new target for pancreatic cancer therapy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a deadly disease that is intractable to currently available treatment regimens. Although well described in different tumors types, the importance of apoptosis inducer prostate apoptosis response-4 (Par-4) in PC has not been appreciated. PC is an oncogenic kras driven disease, which is known to downregulate Par-4. Therefore, this review highlights its significance and builds a strong case supporting the role of Par-4 as a possible therapeutic target in PC.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Literature-based evidence spanning the last 15 years on Par-4 and its significance in PC.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review provides comprehensive knowledge of the significance of Par-4 and its association with kras status in PC, along with the crosstalk with crucial resistance and survival molecules NF-kappaB and Bcl-2 that ultimately are responsible for the overall poor outcome of different therapeutic approaches in this disease.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Par-4 holds promise as a potential therapeutic target that can be induced by chemopreventive agents and small-molecule inhibitors either alone or in combination with standard chemotherapeutics leading to selective apoptosis in PC cells. It also acts as a chemosensitizer and therefore warrants further clinical investigations in this disease.

Gefitinib in combination with irradiation with or without cisplatin in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I trial

PURPOSE

To establish the feasibility and tolerability of gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) with radiation (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter Phase I study, 5 patients with unresectable NSCLC received 250 mg gefitinib daily starting 1 week before RT at a dose of 63 Gy (Step 1). After a first safety analysis, 9 patients were treated daily with 250 mg gefitinib plus CRT in the form of RT and weekly CDDP 35 mg/m(2) (Step 2). Gefitinib was maintained for up to 2 years until disease progression or toxicity.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were assessed in the two steps. In Step 1 (five patients were administered only gefitinib and RT), no lung toxicities were seen, and there was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Adverse events were skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions, limited to Grade 1-2. In Step 2, two of nine patients (22.2%) had DLT. One patient suffered from dyspnea and dehydration associated with neutropenic pneumonia, and another showed elevated liver enzymes. In both steps combined, 5 of 14 patients (35.7%) experienced one or more treatment interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Gefitinib (250 mg daily) in combination with RT and CDDP in patients with Stage III NSCLC is feasible, but CDDP likely enhances toxicity. The impact of gefitinib on survival and disease control as a first-line treatment in combination with RT remains to be determined.

K-RAS mutation in the screening, prognosis and treatment of cancer

The potential use of K-RAS mutation as a cancer screening biomarker has been investigated for many years. Numerous associations between K-RAS mutation and various cancers have been established, but these associations have not been translated into effective, cost-efficient cancer screening strategies. This lack of progress may be due to the existence of K-RAS mutation in nontumor tissues and/or using detection, rather than quantitation, of K-RAS mutation as the endpoint for cancer risk categorization. K-RAS mutation appears to be a useful prognostic biomarker for colon cancer. Recent progress toward sensitive and quantitative mutation characterization and the successful use of K-RAS mutation in a personalized medicine approach to targeted biological therapy selection are likely to re-direct and expand the use of K-RAS mutation as a cancer biomarker in the near future.

Novel agents for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Pancreatic cancer is a particularly challenging malignancy, given its usually advanced stage at diagnosis and its rather limited treatment options. Gemcitabine has been standard therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer for well over a decade. The addition of capecitabine or erlotinib to gemcitabine has resulted in modestly improved, although still poor, overall survival. The majority of the recently completed randomized trials, however, have failed to demonstate an improvement of newer treatments over single-agent gemcitabine. Efforts currently underway center on new cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, as well as novel targeted agents inhibiting various molecular pathways. Newly discovered proteins and cellular elements involved in tumor growth and invasion are potential therapeutic targets, and have become the focus of current trials, as well as future clinical trials. A better understanding of the biology of the disease at the basic science level, and epidemiology and risk factors from a public-health perspective, are needed. Continued research is clearly warranted with the goal of improving survival and optimizing treatment outcomes in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.