Impact of Stressful Climates on Provider Perceptions of Integrated Behavioral Health Services in Pediatric Primary Care: An Exploratory Study

Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Children with chronic conditions have greater health care needs than the general paediatric population but may not receive care that centres their needs and preferences as identified by their families. Clinicians and researchers are interested in developing interventions to improve family-centred care need information about the characteristics of existing interventions, their development and the domains of family-centred care that they address. We conducted a scoping review that aimed to identify and characterize recent family-centred interventions designed to improve experiences with care for children with chronic conditions.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane databases, and grey literature sources for relevant articles or documents published between 1 January 2019 and 11 August 2020 (databases) or 7-20 October 2020 (grey literature). Primary studies with ≥10 participants, clinical practice guidelines and theoretical articles describing family-centred interventions that aimed to improve experiences with care for children with chronic conditions were eligible. Following citation and full-text screening by two reviewers working independently, we charted data covering study characteristics and interventions from eligible reports and synthesized interventions by domains of family-centred care.

RESULTS

Our search identified 2882 citations, from which 63 articles describing 61 unique interventions met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The most common study designs were quasiexperimental studies (n = 18), randomized controlled trials (n = 11) and qualitative and mixed-methods studies (n = 9 each). The most frequently addressed domains of family-centred care were communication and information provision (n = 45), family involvement in care (n = 37) and access to care (n = 30).

CONCLUSION

This review, which identified 61 unique interventions aimed at improving family-centred care for children with chronic conditions across a range of settings, is a concrete resource for researchers, health care providers and administrators interested in improving care for this high-needs population.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study was co-developed with three patient partner co-investigators, all of whom are individuals with lived experiences of rare chronic diseases as parents and/or patients and have prior experience in patient engagement in research (I. J., N. P., M. S.). These patient partner co-investigators contributed to this study at all stages, from conceptualization to dissemination.

Effect of mental health collaborative care models on primary care provider outcomes: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Collaborative care models (CCMs) have robust research evidence in improving mental health outcomes for diverse patient populations with complex health care needs. However, the impact of CCMs on primary care provider (PCP) outcomes are not well described.

OBJECTIVE

This integrative review synthesizes the evidence regarding the effect of mental health CCMs on PCP outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were systematically searched using key terms, with inclusion criteria of English language, peer-reviewed literature, primary care setting, PCP outcomes, and mental health CCM. This resulted in 1,481 total records, with an additional 14 records identified by review of reference lists. After removal of duplicates, 1,319 articles were reviewed based on title and abstract, 190 full-text articles were assessed, and a final selection of 15 articles were critically appraised and synthesized.

RESULTS

The articles included a wide variety of sample sizes, designs, settings, and patient populations, with most studies demonstrating low or moderate quality evidence. Although CCMs had an overwhelmingly positive overall effect on PCP outcomes such as knowledge, satisfaction, and self-efficacy, multiple logistical barriers were also identified that hindered CCM implementation such as time and workflow conflicts. Adaptability of the CCM as well as PCP enthusiasm enhanced positive outcomes. Newer-to-practice PCPs were more likely to participate in CCM initiatives.

CONCLUSION

Accumulating evidence supports CCM expansion, to improve both patient and PCP outcomes. Logistical efforts may enhance CCM adaptability and workflow. Further studies are needed to specifically examine the effect of CCMs on PCP burnout and retention.