Dupilumab Significantly Modulates Pain and Discomfort in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 5 Randomized Clinical Trials

Dupilumab treatment reduces caregiver-reported skin pain in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis aged 6 months to 5 years

Background

Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often has a profound impact on the quality of life of young children and their caregivers. One of the most burdensome symptoms reported by patients is skin pain.

Methods

This post hoc analysis focuses on the impact of dupilumab treatment on skin pain in young children using data from the LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL part B (NCT03346434), a 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in 162 children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD receiving dupilumab or placebo, plus topical corticosteroids (TCS). Analyses were performed on the full analysis set and subgroups of patients who did not achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA >1 subgroup), or who did not achieve a 75% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (

Results

At week 16, change from baseline in the skin pain NRS was significantly greater in the dupilumab group vs. the placebo group (-3.93 vs. -0.62, p < 0.0001) and significantly more patients receiving dupilumab vs. placebo achieved a clinically meaningful improvement at week 16 (47.2% vs. 10.8%, p < .0001). Similar results between dupilumab vs. placebo were seen in the two subgroups IGA >1 and

Conclusions

This analysis showed rapid, clinically meaningful, and statistically significant improvements in skin pain in patients treated with dupilumab plus TCS vs. placebo plus TCS.

Collapse

Key Words

• atopic dermatitis
• children
• dupilumab
• efficacy
• skin pain

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Amy S Paller Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States Division of Dermatology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States
Jonathan I Silverberg Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States
Mercedes E Gonzalez Pediatric Skin Research, Coral Gables, FL, United States The Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
Lynda C Schneider Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Robert Sidbury Division of Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States
Zhen Chen Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States
Ashish Bansal Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States
Zhixiao Wang Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, United States
Randy Prescilla Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, United States

Collapse

Burden of atopic dermatitis in paediatric patients: an international cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Few large-scale international studies have broadly characterized the burden of atopic dermatitis (AD) across age groups among children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVES

To better characterize the AD burden in paediatric patients by disease severity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, web-based survey of paediatric patients (6 months to < 18 years old) was conducted in 18 countries representing North America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East/Eurasia and East Asia. Patients with diagnosed AD were identified based on the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood criteria and self-/parent-report of ever being told by a physician that they or their child had eczema. AD severity was assessed using the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Patient Global Assessment. Outcomes included measures of itch, skin pain, sleep, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), missed school days and atopic comorbidities.

RESULTS

The survey included 1489 children aged 6 months to < 6 years; 2898 children aged 6 to < 12 years; and 3078 adolescents aged 12 to < 18 years diagnosed with AD. Although the burden of mild AD was substantial, paediatric patients with moderate or severe AD had more itch, skin pain, sleep problems and impaired HRQoL, and missed more school days relative to those with mild AD; greater burden was observed among those with severe relative to moderate AD. At least one atopic comorbidity was present in 92.5% of all respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the burden of AD in paediatric patients, especially those with moderate-to-severe disease, and suggest the need for assessments that include the impact of AD on function and daily life.

Which Clinical Measurement Tools for Atopic Dermatitis Severity Make the Most Sense in Clinical Practice?

Assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is essential for therapeutic decision making and monitoring treatment progress. However, there are a myriad of clinical measurement tools available, some of which are impractical for routine clinical use despite being recommended for clinical trials in AD. For measurement tools to be used in clinical practice, they should be valid, reliable, rapidly completed, and scored, and easily incorporated into existing clinic workflows. This narrative review addresses content, validity, and feasibility, and provides a simplified repertoire of assessments for clinical assessment of AD based on prior evidence and expert opinion. Tools that may be feasible for clinical practice include patient-reported outcomes (eg, dermatology life quality index, patient-oriented eczema measure, numerical rating scales for itch, pain, and sleep disturbance, AD Control Tool, and patient-reported global assessment), and clinician-reported outcomes (eg, body surface area and investigator's global assessment). AD is associated with variable clinical signs, symptoms, extent of lesions, longitudinal course, comorbidities, and impacts. Any single domain is insufficient to holistically characterize AD severity, select therapy, or monitor treatment response. A combination of these tools is recommended to balance completeness and feasibility.

Pain Management in Dermatology

BACKGROUND

The dermatologist has to deal with many situations where the patient feels pain and must therefore know how to manage it.

SUMMARY

The aim of this review was to explore the treatments available to manage pain in dermatology in different circumstances, with an emphasis on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions specifically studied in dermatology.

Burden of Disease and Unmet Needs in Atopic Dermatitis: Results From a Patient Survey

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects 2%-10% of adults worldwide. Occurrence and severity of symptoms and treatment success vary among patients. Objective: To determine disease severity, burden, and treatment use and satisfaction in adults with AD. Methods: An international internet-based survey was conducted (October 5-November 1, 2021) in participants with AD from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results: Of 2005 AD patients surveyed, 92% had body surface area (BSA) involvement <10%. Itch was the most bothersome symptom; 48.5% of participants reported severe itch in the past week (Itch Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] 7-10; 45.9% for BSA <10%, 75.0% for BSA ≥10%). Most participants reported moderate or severe sleep disturbance in the past week (Sleep NRS 4-10; 67.1% for BSA <10%, 92.3% for BSA ≥10%). Itch was the top reason for participants' most recent health care provider visit; reducing itching was their top treatment goal. Topical therapies, which were most commonly used, resulted in low treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: Itch was the most bothersome AD symptom. Although clinical development has focused on improving skin lesions, improving itch is patients' top treatment goal. This survey highlights the need for systemic antipruritic therapies that could reduce itch in nonlesional and lesional skin.

Baseline Demographics and Severity and Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adult Patients Initiating Dupilumab Treatment in a Real-World Registry (PROSE)

Introduction

Dupilumab was initially approved in 2017 as the first biologic therapy for atopic dermatitis (AD). We characterized adults with AD initiating dupilumab in a real-world setting in the USA/Canada.

Methods

PROSE is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, observational, multicenter registry of patients with AD initiating dupilumab per country-specific prescribing information. We report baseline data (day of first dupilumab injection) for patients enrolled from April 2018 through July 2019.

Results

Among 315 patients (mean age 42.5 years, 55.2% female), the median AD duration was 17.0 years; 65.4% reported a history of type 2 inflammatory comorbidities (e.g., allergic rhinitis, asthma), and 93.3% reported treatment(s) for AD in the previous year, including topical corticosteroids (90.8%), systemic corticosteroids (36.2%), and nonsteroidal systemic therapies (14.0%). In total, 89.2% had an Overall Disease Severity score of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe). Other mean disease severity scores included the following: Eczema Area and Severity Index 16.9 (range 0–72), body surface area affected 26.8%, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure 18.5 (range 0–28), Dermatology Life Quality Index 12.7 (range 0–30), and pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score 6.9 (range 0–10).

Conclusion

Patients initiating dupilumab have longstanding moderate-to-severe AD with significant disease burden and frequent type 2 comorbidities.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT03428646.

Long-term management of moderate-to-severe adult atopic dermatitis: a consensus by the Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (SIDeMaST), the Association of Italian Territorial and Hospital Allergists and Immunologists (AAIITO ), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI), the Italian Society of Allergological, Environmental and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA), and the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic-relapsing inflammatory skin disease, burdened by various comorbidities. AD most commonly occurs in children but may persist or present in adulthood becoming a lifelong condition. Therefore, AD requires an effective long-term treatment improving disease signs and symptoms but also of patients' quality of life (QoL). However continuous long-term use of most traditional AD immunosuppressive treatments is not recommended for safety reasons or insufficient efficacy data. Despite the available guidelines, there is still need for knowledge of AD long-term treatment, taking into account new disease measures and recent treatment options. Five Italian scientific societies implemented a joint consensus procedure to define the most appropriate clinical practice for the long-term management of adult moderate-severe AD. Through a modified Delphi procedure, consensus was reached by overall 51 Italian dermatologists and allergists (The Italian AD Study Group) experienced in the management of adult AD on 14 statements covering three AD areas of interest, namely diagnosis, definition of disease severity and clinimetrics, and a treat-to-target approach. This paper reports and discusses the agreed statements, which define disease and patient impact measures, therapeutic approach, and a treatment decision algorithm to support clinicians in the long-term management of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD in their daily clinical practice.

A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with pruritus, characterized by recurrent eczema with exacerbations and remissions. AD impairs patients’ QOL and places a heavy burden on patients. Recently, dupilumab, an anti–IL-4Rα antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are refractory to topical agents and/or conventional systemic therapy. Clinical trials of dupilumab for AD demonstrated high efficacy and tolerable safety profiles. Furthermore, real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD is accumulating. Most of these data show favorable effectiveness and safety profile; however, they also clarified issues, including conjunctivitis and facial redness. There are still a certain number of patients with significant failure. In this article, we review real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD, identify concerns specific to dupilumab, and discuss unmet needs and issues to be addressed in the future.

Characteristics, mechanism, and management of pain in atopic dermatitis: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Developments in basic science and clinical research have increased our understanding of AD. Although pain as a symptom of AD is underemphasized in previous studies, multiple researchers address pain as a frequent burden of AD. However, the exact role of pain in AD is not fully understood.

AIMS

Our review aimed to summarize the current evidence focusing on characteristics, mechanism, and management of pain in AD.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We conducted a thorough literature review in the PubMed database to figure out different aspects discussing pain in AD, including pain symptoms, burden, the relationship between pain and itch, mechanism, and pain management in AD.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

AD patients affected by skin pain vary from 42.7%-92.2% with remarkable intensity and heavy burden. Skin pain and itch interacted both in symptoms and mechanisms. Atopic skin with the impaired barrier, neurogenic inflammation mediators, peripheral and central sensitization of pain may possibly explain pain mechanism in AD. Future research is needed to clarify the commonality and disparity of pain and itch in AD in order to seek efficacious medications and treatment.