1
|
Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Møller P, Pal T, McCuaig JM, Singer CF, Karlan BY, Aeilts A, Eng C, Eisen A, Bordeleau L, Foulkes WD, Tung N, Couch FJ, Fruscio R, Neuhausen SL, Zakalik D, Cybulski C, Metcalfe K, Olopade OI, Sun P, Lubinski J, Narod SA. Bilateral Oophorectomy and All-Cause Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:484-492. [PMID: 38421677 PMCID: PMC10905374 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Importance Preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is offered to women at high risk of ovarian cancer who carry a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2; however, the association of oophorectomy with all-cause mortality has not been clearly defined. Objective To evaluate the association between bilateral oophorectomy and all-cause mortality among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international, longitudinal cohort study of women with BRCA sequence variations, information on bilateral oophorectomy was obtained via biennial questionnaire. Participants were women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, no prior history of cancer, and at least 1 follow-up questionnaire completed. Women were followed up from age 35 to 75 years for incident cancers and deaths. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for all-cause mortality associated with a bilateral oophorectomy (time dependent). Data analysis was performed from January 1 to June 1, 2023. Exposures Self-reported bilateral oophorectomy (with or without salpingectomy). Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, and ovarian cancer-specific mortality. Results There were 4332 women (mean age, 42.6 years) enrolled in the cohort, of whom 2932 (67.8%) chose to undergo a preventive oophorectomy at a mean (range) age of 45.4 (23.0-77.0) years. After a mean follow-up of 9.0 years, 851 women had developed cancer and 228 had died; 57 died of ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, 58 died of breast cancer, 16 died of peritoneal cancer, and 97 died of other causes. The age-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality associated with oophorectomy was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.24-0.42; P < .001). The age-adjusted HR was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.20-0.38; P < .001) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22-0.90; P = .03) for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations, respectively. For women with BRCA1 sequence variations, the estimated cumulative all-cause mortality to age 75 years for women who had an oophorectomy at age 35 years was 25%, compared to 62% for women who did not have an oophorectomy. For women with BRCA2 sequence variations, the estimated cumulative all-cause mortality to age 75 years was 14% for women who had an oophorectomy at age 35 years compared to 28% for women who did not have an oophorectomy. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, oophorectomy was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumour Biology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jeanna M. McCuaig
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian F. Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute and Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nadine Tung
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Health, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bloomberg School of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ping Sun
- Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sellers TA, Peres LC, Hathaway CA, Tworoger SS. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023; 13:a038216. [PMID: 37137500 PMCID: PMC10411689 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Given the challenges with achieving effective and durable treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, primary prevention is highly desirable. Fortunately, decades of research have provided evidence for several strategies that can be deployed to optimize risk reduction. These include surgery, chemoprevention, and lifestyle factor modifications. These broad categories vary in terms of the magnitude of risk reduction possible, the possible short-term and long-term side effects, the degree of difficulty, and acceptability. Thus, the concept of a risk-based model to personalize preventive interventions is advocated to guide discussion between care providers and women at risk. For women with inherited major gene mutations that greatly increase risk of ovarian cancer, surgical approaches have favorable risk to benefit ratios. Chemoprevention and lifestyle factor modifications portend a lower degree of risk reduction but confer lower risk of undesirable side effects. Since complete prevention is not currently possible, better methods for early detection remain a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Sellers
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| | - Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Cassandra A Hathaway
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kotsopoulos J, Kim SJ, Armel S, Bordeleau L, Foulkes WD, McKinnon W, Panchal S, Cohen SA, Sun S, Sun P, McKetton L, Troyer AK, Narod SA. An evaluation of memory and attention in BRCA mutation carriers using an online cognitive assessment tool. Cancer 2021; 127:3183-3193. [PMID: 34077552 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of various surgical, hormonal, and lifestyle factors on memory and attention in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS BRCA mutation carriers enrolled in a longitudinal study were invited to complete an online brain health assessment tool designed to screen for cognitive deficits. Four measures of memory and executive attention were assessed individually, and an overall score was compiled adjusting for age. Exposures, including preventive surgery, hormone use, and lifestyle factors, were captured by questionnaire. Performance on each of the 5 subtasks was analyzed according to various exposures. Analysis of covariance was used to compare overall scores. RESULTS In total, 880 women completed the online cognitive assessment. The average age of the participants was 54 years (range, 23-86 years). The mean overall test score was 54.4 (range, 0-93). The individual subtask scores declined with age at test completion (P < .0001) and increased with level of education (P ≤ .01). Women who underwent a preventive oophorectomy had a significantly higher overall score compared with women who did not undergo this surgery (55.5 vs 50.5; P = .01). Reconstructive breast surgery was also associated with a higher overall score (56.5 vs 52.3; P = .005). Chemotherapy and hormone-replacement therapy were not predictive of the overall score. CONCLUSIONS These findings are reassuring to high-risk women who undergo early surgical menopause for their cancer predisposition. Further studies are needed to evaluate cognitive function over time when memory deficits become more prevalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wendy McKinnon
- Familial Cancer Program, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Cohen
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sophie Sun
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Angela K Troyer
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim H, Kim Y, Fava M, Mischoulon D, Shin MH, Lee DY, Jeon HJ. Increased risk of depression before and after unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy: A self-controlled case series study using a nationwide cohort in South Korea. J Affect Disord 2021; 285:47-54. [PMID: 33631480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is insufficient evidence of the association between oophorectomy and depression. METHODS A nationwide medical records database of South Korea was used to investigate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of major depressive disorder before and after oophorectomy (n = 36,284) using a self-controlled case series design. Outcomes before and after hysterectomy (n = 25,415) were identified to compare with those around oophorectomy. RESULTS In all oophorectomy and hysterectomy groups, the risk of depression was increased before and after surgery, peaking immediately before or after the operation, with no significant difference in the pattern of the results according to type of surgery. In the bilateral oophorectomy group, the IRR was increased between 2-3 months before the surgery, peaking immediately before surgery at 1.39 (95% CI: 1.30-1.49, p < .0001), and remained heightened for one-year postexposure. Subgroup analyses performed according to ovarian cancer, age group, and hormone replacement therapy produced results similar to those of the main outcome. LIMITATIONS Because we used claims data, the detailed clinical information related to oophorectomy is lacking. There is possibility that time-varying confounder besides age and season might have affected the results CONCLUSIONS: The risk of depression increased before and after oophorectomy. The increase in risk of depression started before oophorectomy and peaked immediately before or after the operation, but no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral surgery and cancer and noncancer or among age groups were noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyewon Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yuwon Kim
- Department of Data Science, Evidnet, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - David Mischoulon
- Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Myung-Hee Shin
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Dong-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
| | - Hong Jin Jeon
- Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, and Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hickey M, Moss KM, Brand A, Wrede CD, Domchek SM, Meiser B, Mishra GD, Joffe H. What happens after menopause? (WHAM): A prospective controlled study of depression and anxiety up to 12 months after premenopausal risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:527-534. [PMID: 33583580 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) substantially reduces ovarian cancer risk in women with pathogenic gene variants and is generally recommended by age 34-45 years. Natural menopause is a vulnerable period for mood disturbance, but the risk of depression and anxiety in the first 12 months after RRBSO and potential modifying effect of hormone therapy are uncertain. METHODS Prospective controlled observational study of 95 premenopausal women planning RRBSO and a Comparison group of 99 premenopausal women who retained their ovaries,- 95% of whom were at population level risk of ovarian cancer. Clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety were measured using standardised instruments at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Chi-square tests and adjusted logistic regression models compared differences between groups. RESULTS Baseline symptoms and previous depression or anxiety did not differ between groups. At 3 months after RRBSO clinically significant depressive symptoms were doubled (14.5% vs 27.1%, p = 0.010), which persisted at 12 months. Depressive symptoms were stable in comparisons. At 3 months after RRBSO, clinically significant anxiety symptoms almost trebled (6.1% vs 17.7%, p = 0.014) before plateauing at 6 months and returning to baseline at 12 months. Compared to comparisons, RRBSO participants were at 3.0-fold increased risk of chronic depressive symptoms (Wald 95% CI 1.27-7.26), 2.3-fold increased risk of incident depression (95% Wald CI 1.08-5.13) and 2.0-fold increase of incident anxiety (Wald 95% CI 0.78-5.00). Depression and anxiety were slightly more common in Hormone Therapy users after RRBSO vs non-users. CONCLUSIONS RRBSO leads to a rapid increase in clinically significant depressive and anxiety symptoms despite Hormone Therapy use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Katrina M Moss
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alison Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C David Wrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Gynae-oncology and Dysplasia Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gita D Mishra
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hadine Joffe
- Psychiatry Department and Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|