1
|
Weidman AA, Valentine L, Stearns SA, Alvarez AH, Foppiani J, Long E, Lin SJ. Patient Comfort with Before and After Photography at Plastic Surgery Offices. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:2895-2901. [PMID: 38485787 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before and after (B&A) photographs are a sensitive part of patients' medical records, and the use of smartphones may pose risks to confidentiality and comfort. The purpose of this study was to assess patient comfort depending on the circumstances under which these photographs being taken. METHODS Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing service and REDCap's survey manager were used to recruit survey participants. An anonymous survey was distributed to ascertain demographics and comfort in various B&A scenarios using a five-point Likert scale. T tests and ANOVA testing were used to compare groups. RESULTS There were 411 respondents with an average age of 36.1 years old. Of them, 46% were female and the majority were White (90%) and non-Hispanic (64%). Nearly one-third had previously undergone plastic surgery, with 80% receiving B&A photography. Surgeons took these photographs 51% of the time with similar rates of smartphone cameras use (47%) versus professional cameras (52%). The public had similar levels of comfort when a nurse or a surgeon took the clinical photographs (p = 0.08). Patients were significantly less comfortable when non-medically trained office staff captured their photographs (p = 0.0041). The public had similar comfort levels with the use of smartphones and professional cameras when dressed but were significantly less comfortable with the use of a smartphone when unclothed (p = < 0.001). CONCLUSION To ensure the best patient experience, B&A photography should be taken by a medical professional. If photographs are to be taken when the patient is unclothed, the use of a professional-grade camera may help ease patient discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan A Weidman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Lauren Valentine
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Stephen A Stearns
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jose Foppiani
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Emily Long
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valentine L, Weidman AA, Stearns SA, Dennis D, Alvarez AH, Foppiani J, Lin SJ. Rhinoplasty Preferences: Can the Public Detect Prior Surgery on Social Media? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:2423-2431. [PMID: 38286896 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03791-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The creation of postoperative rhinoplasty results that appear natural and proportional to the face are crucial for patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to assess the public's ability to detect a post-rhinoplasty result and preference of preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty outcomes. METHODS A survey was distributed using the Amazon Mechanical Turk online platform showing nine preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty patients. Participants rated aesthetic appearance, identified areas of abnormality, and stated whether they believed the patient had undergone prior rhinoplasty. RESULTS A total of 456 responses were included. On a scale of 1-5 with 5 being the most aesthetically pleasing, the highest rated nose was a postoperative patient without visible deformities (3.95, SD 1.07) followed by the postoperative patient with a resultant bulbous tip (3.48, SD 0.96). The lowest ranking noses were the prior rhinoplasty with resultant saddle nose deformity (3.02, SD 1.19) and the prior rhinoplasty with nasal trapezoid deformity (2.95, SD 1.04). The public was able to correctly determine if patients had prior rhinoplasty surgery only if there were resultant defects. When respondents believed that the patient had undergone prior rhinoplasty, their average rating was lower than those who believed they had not undergone surgery (3.74/5 vs. 4.15/5, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The belief that someone had previously undergone rhinoplasty led the public to rate the aesthetic appearance of the nose lower. To provide optimal results following rhinoplasty, surgeons may therefore seek to provide a natural, "un-operated" look. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Differences for nasal aesthetic preferences exist and vary based on geographic region The public is unable to discern if a patient previously underwent rhinoplasty if the result does not show a postoperative defect, such as a dorsal hump, over-rotated tip, or mid-vault collapse Oppositely, the public can generally tell if patients have undergone rhinoplasty surgery if a postoperative deformity is present The belief that someone had rhinoplasty surgery negatively impacts the attractiveness ranking of the nose, even without any postoperative defects present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Valentine
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Allan A Weidman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Stephen A Stearns
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Daniella Dennis
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jose Foppiani
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Foppiani JA, Kim E, Weidman A, Valentine L, Stearns S, Alvarez AH, Lee TC, Moradian S, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Preferences and Barriers of Male Patients Seeking Aesthetic Procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:1465-1472. [PMID: 37750951 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03659-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As social attitudes toward plastic surgery continue to evolve, the prevalence of men seeking plastic surgery has been increasing. By delving into the factors that encourage male patients to seek plastic surgery and the obstacles they encounter, this study aims to facilitate the development of more inclusive and effective approaches for this population. METHOD An anonymous 41-question survey was conducted among adult men in the USA via the Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform. Questions assessed demographic information and identified factors that influenced males to seek plastic surgery care, the barriers they experienced while seeking care, and their preferences. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess relationships between demographic variables and likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. RESULTS Four hundred and eleven complete responses were analyzed. The median (IQR) age of respondents was 32 (30, 40) years old. Of the respondents, 60% had undergone cosmetic surgery. Functional improvement (40%), personal aspiration (32%), and partners' opinions (22%) were the most commonly cited reasons for undergoing procedures. The most common barriers faced by this population were recovery time following a procedure (52%), perceived risk of complications (48%), cost (43%), fear of being identified as having had plastic surgery (32%), and surgeons not being able to meet expectations (31%). Eighty-nine percent of respondents who underwent plastic surgery procedures reported facing at least one barrier. Multivariate regression demonstrated that higher education levels were strongly associated with a likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery (p < 0.001). Income (p = 0.44) and region (p = 0.23) did not significantly affect the likelihood of undergoing plastic surgery. CONCLUSION Despite improving societal stigma, many male patients continue to face barriers when obtaining plastic surgery care. Efforts may be made to alleviate these barriers and surgeons looking to expand their practice may benefit from increased outreach to male patients. This may be compounded with improved education targeting stigma and risks of procedures, increasing male-specific marketing communications to make them feel welcome in an industry predominantly focused on female patients, and offering male-tailored procedures. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose A Foppiani
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Erin Kim
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Allan Weidman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Lauren Valentine
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Stephen Stearns
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Simon Moradian
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bernard T Lee
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foppiani JA, Kim E, Weidman AA, Alvarez AH, Escobar-Domingo MJ, Valentine L, Lee TC, Mathes DW, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Continuing Insurance Coverage for Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Reservation Cost Related to a Woman's Abdominal Flap Choice? Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:S228-S233. [PMID: 38556679 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent proposed alterations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, although subsequently reversed on August 21, 2023, have engendered persistent concerns regarding the impact of insurance policies on breast reconstruction procedures coverage. This study aimed to identify factors that would influence women's preferences regarding autologous breast reconstruction to better understand the possible consequences of these coverage changes. METHODS A survey of adult women in the United States was conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess patient preferences for breast reconstruction options, specifically deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery. The Cochrane-Armitage test evaluated trends in flap preferences concerning incremental out-of-pocket payment increases. RESULTS Of 500 total responses, 485 were completed and correctly answered a verification question to ensure adequate attention to the survey, with respondents having a median (interquartile range) age of 26 (25-39) years. When presented with the advantages and disadvantages of DIEP versus TRAM flaps, 78% of respondents preferred DIEP; however, as DIEP's out-of-pocket price incrementally rose, more respondents favored the cheaper TRAM option, with $3804 being the "indifference point" where preferences for both procedures converged (P < 0.001). Notably, respondents with a personal history of breast reconstruction showed a higher preference for DIEP, even at a $10,000 out-of-pocket cost (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Out-of-pocket cost can significantly influence women's choices for breast reconstruction. These findings encourage a reevaluation of emergent insurance practices that could potentially increase out-of-pocket costs associated with DIEP flaps, to prevent cost from decreasing equitable patient access to most current reconstructive options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose A Foppiani
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Erin Kim
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Allan A Weidman
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maria J Escobar-Domingo
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren Valentine
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - David W Mathes
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO
| | - Bernard T Lee
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Samuel J Lin
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fung E, Cevallos P, Thawanyarat K, Rowley M, Navarro Y, Sheckter C, Nazerali R. What Do Patients Look for When Scheduling Their Initial Elective Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Consultation? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47:2700-2710. [PMID: 37620567 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03609-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple factors influence patients when deciding on where to seek plastic surgery consultations. Our objective was to determine the most important factors when booking the initial consultation. METHODS A 23 question survey was distributed online via Amazon Mechanical Turk targeting participants who had prior plastic surgery consultations or were planning to have one in the future. Participant demographic data were collected, and participants were asked to rank the importance of factors related to cost, surgeon reputation, social media, technology, amenities, accessibility, and appointment details on a 1-5 Likert scale. Rankings were reported by mean and standard deviation. RESULTS A total of 593 responses were gathered. 48.1% of participants were 25-34 years of age, 54.6% were female, 66.3% identified as White, 78.4% were located in the U.S, and 54.5% had a bachelor's degree. Participants rated the importance of a surgeon's online reviews (mean 4.15, SD 0.81), surgeon presence at follow-up visits (mean 4.01, SD 0.91), and availability of pricing prior to appointment (mean 4.01, SD 0.91) the highest. The least important factors were waiting room amenities and social media advertising. Individuals younger than 45 were more likely to rate a surgeon's social media presence higher than those 45 years and older (OR 2.02; 95%CI [1.37-2.96]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients considered surgeon's online reviews, presence at follow-up visits, and the availability of pricing information the most important when booking a plastic surgery consultation. These findings may assist physicians in structuring plastic surgery consultations based on factors important to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Fung
- State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Norton School of Medicine, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
| | | | | | - Mallory Rowley
- State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Norton School of Medicine, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA
| | - Yelissa Navarro
- Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Clifford Sheckter
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rahim Nazerali
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shiah E, Weidman AA, Valentine L, Alvarez AH, Foppiani JA, Lin SJ. Capitalizing on social media: An evaluation of the public's preferences for plastic surgery social media content. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 83:308-317. [PMID: 37295155 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of utilizing social media platforms to promote clinical practices and attract patients has been well established. This study aimed to assess what plastic surgery social media content and educational material the public is most responsive to. METHODS An anonymous 25-question survey was distributed using REDCap and Amazon's Mechanical Turk to ascertain demographic information, patterns of social media use, levels of interest in plastic surgery, and preferences for plastic surgery content. RESULTS Of 401 participants, the typical respondent was between 25 and 34 years old and on social media daily. Almost half of the respondents (46.1%) have intentionally viewed plastic surgery content on social media, of which most used Instagram (71.1%) and Facebook (55.4%). Participants grouped as either younger or older than 35 years old were equally likely to have viewed plastic surgery content (p = 0.33). Content categories with the highest interest were before and after results (mean Likert weight 4.00 ± 1.10), patient testimonials (3.73 ± 1.15), and recovery process (3.67 ± 1.14). Content on celebrities (2.89 ± 1.17), comedic videos (2.79 ± 1.19), and surgeons' private lives (2.51 ± 1.08) received negative interest. Photo posts (51.4%) were preferred more than video posts (27.2%). Before and after results on social media were the most influential factor in the selection of a plastic surgeon (45.9%). CONCLUSIONS The importance of social media for plastic surgeons to be able to interact with patients is at unprecedented heights. Understanding patterns of the public's social media content preferences will help plastic surgeons optimize their social media reach and influence their target audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Shiah
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Allan A Weidman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lauren Valentine
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Angelica H Alvarez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jose A Foppiani
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burton JS, Pfeifauf K, Skolnick GB, Sacks JM, Snyder-Warwick AK. Determinants of Public Opinion Toward Gender-Affirming Surgery in the United States. Transgend Health 2023. [DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2022.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson S. Burton
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kristin Pfeifauf
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gary B. Skolnick
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Justin M. Sacks
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alison K. Snyder-Warwick
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Which Factors Are Important to Women When Choosing a Breast Reconstruction Surgeon? Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:38-45. [PMID: 35499575 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women undergoing breast reconstruction often research their health care provider options. The authors studied which factors may influence how a woman selects a plastic surgeon for breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS An online survey was distributed by means of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, Wash.) to 1025 adult women. Participants were asked to imagine a scenario in which they had breast cancer, needed to undergo mastectomy, and were choosing a reconstructive surgeon. They were then asked to rank factors influencing this decision on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Two-sample t tests were used to compare Likert scores between dichotomized categories based on participant characteristics. RESULTS Women assigned the highest scores [mean (standard deviation)] to online reviews on Vitals or WebMD [6.1 (1.2)], years of experience [5.7 (1.4)], recommendations from another surgeon [5.7 (1.3)] or family/friend [4.9 (1.7)], and attending a top medical school [4.7 (1.7)]. Lowest ranked factors were online advertising and surgeon demographics, including having a sex concordant (female) surgeon. After amalgamation into attribute subsections, mean (standard deviation) rated relative importance of surgeon reputation [0.72 (0.13)] was higher than that of appearance [0.46 (0.19)] and demographics [0.31 (0.13)]. Patient demographics influenced relative importance of certain attributes; older, educated, and higher-income patients placed higher value on surgeon appearance (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS When selecting a breast reconstruction surgeon, women place the highest value on surgeons' online, educational, and personal reputations. Though most show no strong preferences for surgeon demographics or physical attributes, specific features may be important for some patients. Cognizance of these preferences may enable providers to more effectively understand patient expectations.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past twenty years explicit gender bias towards women in surgery has been replaced by more subtle barriers, which represent indirect forms of discrimination and prevents equality. OBJECTIVE The aim of our scoping review is to summarize the different forms of discrimination towards women in surgery. METHODS The database search consisted of original studies regarding discrimination towards female surgeons. RESULTS Of 3,615 studies meeting research criteria, 63 were included. Of these articles, 11 (18%) were focused on gender-based discrimination, 14 (22%) on discrimination in authorship, research productivity and research funding, 21 (33%) on discrimination in academic surgery, 7 (11%) on discrimination in surgical leadership positions and 10 (16%) on discrimination during conferences and in surgical societies. The majority (n = 53, 84%) of the included studies were conducted in the U.S.A. According to our analysis, female surgeons experience discrimination from male colleagues, healthcare workers, but also from patients and trainees. Possible solutions may include acknowledgement of the problem, increased education of diversity and integration for the younger generations, mentorship, coaching and more active engagement by male and female partners to support women in the surgical field. CONCLUSIONS Gender-based discrimination toward women in the field of surgery has evolved over the past twenty years, from an explicit to a more subtle attitude. A work-environment where diversity and flexibility are valued would allow female surgeons to better realize their full potential.
Collapse
|
10
|
Henderson JT, Mullens CL, Woodberry KM. US Public's Perceptions of Online Transformation Photos. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1483-1491. [PMID: 33848328 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many plastic surgeons seek to optimize their online presence and reach a broader patient base, no studies to our knowledge have evaluated the general public's perceptions of one of the most valued informational tools: transformation photos. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the general public's preferences for viewing transformation photos online. METHODS Respondents representative of the US public, crowdsourced through Amazon Mechanical Turk, answered a survey assessing perceptions of the posting of before-and-after photos. RESULTS One thousand respondents completed the questionnaire. Ninety percent (905/1000) of respondents are willing to view online before-and-after photos. Sixty-three percent (634/1000) would consent to online posting of before-and-after photos of at least 1 body area, with comfort levels highest for facelift (36.4%), nonoperative facial rejuvenation (31.9%), liposuction (24.9%), and abdominoplasty (23.2%). Breast reduction (12.4%), breast reconstruction (10.9%), gluteal augmentation (14.0%), and vaginal rejuvenation (4.4%) are considered least acceptable for public posting. Respondents are significantly more opposed to online viewing of genitals than any other body area (P < 0.0001). Of those willing to have their own transformation photos posted online, 74.0% would allow posting on professional practice websites, 35.1% on Instagram, 26.6% on Facebook, 17.2% on Twitter, and 10.7% on Snapchat. Significantly more respondents prefer their transformation photos reside only on professional practice websites rather than on a social media platform (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The public considers aesthetic facial procedures and body contouring most acceptable for showcasing transformation photos online. Although most respondents prefer viewing these photos on professional practice websites, Instagram is the favored social media platform. The majority of the public seek transformation photos when choosing a plastic surgeon for a cosmetic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Henderson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Cody L Mullens
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Kerri M Woodberry
- Division of Plastic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Perceived versus Patient-Reported Significance of Surgeon Gender in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:720-728. [PMID: 34550924 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous investigators demonstrated that female patients often prefer female providers. However, these studies have not determined whether there are gender preferences for breast reconstruction surgeons or whether the effects of surgeon gender impacts patient-reported outcomes. METHODS Adult women were crowdsourced using Amazon Mechanical Turk to characterize societal preferences for the gender of breast and plastic surgeons in a hypothetical scenario. The authors also used data from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium to determine the association between surgeon gender and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported outcomes at 3 months and 2 years following reconstruction. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effects of surgeon gender on patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS In total, 1413 surveys were collected. Forty-two percent preferred female plastic surgeons, 5 percent preferred male surgeons, and 53 percent reported no preference. The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium analysis included 2236 patients of 55 male and nine female plastic surgeons. In this cohort, 1921 patients (82.2 percent) had male surgeons, whereas 415 patients (17.8 percent) had female surgeons. Regression analysis at 2 years revealed no differences in satisfaction with surgeon, outcome, or psychosocial well-being. Only satisfaction with information differed, as patients of female surgeons reported greater satisfaction in this category, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.82 (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Although nonpatient women hypothetically prefer female providers, surgeon gender makes little difference in actual patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. More investigation is needed to determine whether the difference in information delivery is clinically significant and whether it reflects variations in practices between male and female surgeons. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
|
12
|
Surgical patients have an unconscious bias that women are not surgeons. Am J Surg 2021; 223:819-820. [PMID: 34656319 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
13
|
Crowe CS, Lopez J, Morrison SD, Drolet BC, Janis JE. The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Resident Education and Wellness: A National Survey of Plastic Surgery Residents. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:462e-474e. [PMID: 34432706 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound effect on surgical training programs, reflecting decreases in elective surgical cases and emergency restructuring of clinical teams. The effect of these measures on U.S. plastic surgery resident education and wellness has not been characterized. METHODS An institutional review board-exempted anonymous survey was developed through expert panel discussion and pilot testing. All current U.S. plastic surgery trainees were invited to complete a cross-sectional 28-question survey in April of 2020. Respondents were queried regarding demographic information, educational experiences, and wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS A total of 668 residents responded to the survey, corresponding to a 56.1 percent response rate. Sex, training program type, postgraduate year, and region were well represented within the sample. Nearly all trainees (97.1 percent) reported restructuring of their clinical teams. One-sixth of respondents were personally redeployed to assist with the care of COVID-19 patients. A considerable proportion of residents felt that the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on their education (58.1 percent) and wellness (84.8 percent). Residents found virtual curriculum effective and meaningful, and viewed an average of 4.2 lectures weekly. Although most residents did not anticipate a change in career path, some reported negative consequences on job prospects or fellowship. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic had a considerable impact on U.S. plastic surgery education and wellness. Although reductions in case volume may be temporary, this may represent a loss of critical, supervised clinical experience. Some effects may be positive, such as the development of impactful virtual lectures that allow for cross-institutional curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Crowe
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Department of Plastic Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University
| | - Joseph Lopez
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Department of Plastic Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University
| | - Shane D Morrison
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Department of Plastic Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University
| | - Brian C Drolet
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Department of Plastic Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University
| | - Jeffrey E Janis
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Department of Plastic Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhat D, Kollu T, Giutashvili T, Patel A, Ricci JA. Does Surgeon Training Affect Patient Perception of Surgeon Skill in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction? J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 38:361-370. [PMID: 34454406 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to investigate whether a surgeon's training background and years of experience advertised on a social media platform influences perception of surgeon competence, patient recruitment likelihood, and referral likelihood. METHODS A mockup of an Instagram post was created using a before and after picture of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap patient. The caption under each post was changed to reflect one of six possible training categories: 1 year of experience, 10 years of experience, 20 years of experience, fellowship, Ivy League training, and a null case (with no training information against which all other cases were compared). Surveys asked female responders to evaluate surgeon competence, likelihood of becoming a patient, and likelihood of making a referral to their friends or family. Amazon MTurk crowdsourcing platform was used to distribute the survey. RESULTS A total of 1,878 responses were recorded, with the majority identifying as Caucasian (59%). The surgeon with 20 years of experience had the highest patient recruitment scores when compared with the null, 1 year, 10 year, and Ivy League training backgrounds (p = 0.0314, p = 0.0065, p = 0.0207, and p = 0.0244, respectively). The majority of responders (67%) preferred a female surgeon. Responders with a history of breast reconstruction assigned lower surgeon competence scores compared with women without a history of breast cancer (p <0.0001). Women who underwent breast reconstruction were also less likely to make referrals to their family and friends (p <0.0001). CONCLUSION Surgeon's experience influences whether a patient is likely to seek care from a plastic surgeon. Personal history of breast cancer has a negative impact on perceived surgeon competence as well as patient recruitment likelihood and referral likelihood. Emphasizing fewer years of training or Ivy League training did not make an appreciable difference in patient perception of competence or likelihood of recruiting a new patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa Bhat
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Tejas Kollu
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | | | - Ashit Patel
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Joseph A Ricci
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thinking Outside the Black Box: Current Perceptions on Breast Implant Safety and Utility. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:593-603. [PMID: 33620927 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing public concern surrounding breast implant safety. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently proposed changes to breast implant labeling, which include a boxed warning. Given such efforts to increase transparency on breast implant safety, this study assessed laywomen's perceptions of breast implant safety, and the impact of proposed changes to breast implant labeling on laywomen's decision-making regarding breast implants. METHODS This was a cross-sectional investigation of women recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Discrete choice modeling was used to query opinions on breast implants after viewing proposed labeling changes. Chi-square and analysis of variance were used for subgroup analyses, and McNemar analyses were used to assess changes in participants' responses. RESULTS The authors received 500 survey responses. At baseline, 353 participants (70.6 percent) considered breast implants to be at least somewhat safe. After viewing the proposed boxed warning, 252 participants (50.4 percent) responded that they would be less likely to receive implants. In fact, a significantly greater proportion of participants considered breast implants to be either unsafe or very unsafe after viewing suggested changes to implant labeling than at baseline (58.4 percent versus 28.8 percent; p = 0.001). By the end of the survey, willingness to consider alternative options for breast augmentation/reconstruction increased significantly from baseline. CONCLUSIONS Improved labeling can enhance laywomen's understanding of breast implant safety and can impact decision-making. However, greater scrutiny of breast implants should not prevent women who need implants from receiving them. Transparency and objectivity in the surgeon-patient dialogue can ensure the appropriate use of medical devices such as breast implants.
Collapse
|
16
|
Testing for Implicit Gender Bias among Plastic Surgeons. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3612. [PMID: 34104616 PMCID: PMC8183824 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of implicit bias within the field of plastic surgery using a gender-specific Implicit Association Test (IAT), specifically looking at gender and career stereotypes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3315. [PMID: 33552806 PMCID: PMC7858709 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging.
Collapse
|
18
|
Salehi PP, Wong BJF, Azizzadeh B. The Potential for Telemedicine to Reduce Bias in Patients Seeking Facial Plastic Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 164:909-910. [PMID: 33019883 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820964731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Telemedicine use among otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons and facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons has accelerated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, it is unclear what impact the increased adoption of telehealth will have on the doctor-patient relationship, patients' perceptions of individual practices, and the likelihood of patients proceeding with the next steps toward surgery. While an understanding of these complex questions is imperative for all otolaryngologists, it is extremely important for facial plastic surgeons who focus on elective procedures, particularly cosmetic/aesthetic operations. The use of telemedicine has the potential to reduce bias among patients seeking facial plastic surgery, especially cosmetic procedures. As reports of this phenomenon are anecdotal thus far, we recommend further study into the specific criteria that patients consider when selecting a facial plastic surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parsa P Salehi
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Brian J F Wong
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Babak Azizzadeh
- Center for Advanced Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California, USA.,Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|