Lymphedema Liposuction with Immediate Limb Contouring

Combination of Supramicrosurgical Lymphatico-Venular Anastomosis (sLVA) and Lymph-Sparing Liposuction in Treating Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Rationale for a Regional One-Stage Approach

Objective: Cancer-related lymphedema represents a potential complication of cancer treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of lymphatico-venular anastomosis and liposuction in the treatment of secondary lymphedema. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of patients affected by cancer-related unilateral limb lymphedema. Inclusion criteria included previous neoplastic pathology with the consequent development of unilateral limb lymphedema, while the exclusion criteria included the presence of comorbidities and the persistence of cancer, as well as previous lymphatic surgery. The outcomes to be included were a reduction in the limb volume and lymphangitis rate, and an improvement in the quality of life. Patients' data were assessed before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Perioperative management included clinical and ultrasonographical evaluations. Under local anesthesia, lymphatico-venular anastomosis with the supramicrosurgical technique and the liposuction of the affected limb was performed in the same surgical session. Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled in the study. One year after the surgery, an average volume reduction of 37.9% was registered (p = 0.0000000596). The lymphangitis rate decreased after surgery from 4.67 to 0.95 per year (p = 0.000007899). The quality-of-life score improved from 68.7 to 16 according to the LLIS scale. Conclusions: The combination of LVA and liposuction represents a valid strategy for treating cancer-related lymphedema, ensuring stable results over time. In addition, it can be performed under local anesthesia, resulting in being minimally invasive and well-tolerated by patients. This paper reports on the short-term efficacy of this combined technique.

Complete Reduction of Leg Lymphedema after Liposuction: A 5-Year Prospective Study in 67 Patients without Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema leads to adipose tissue deposition that cannot be removed using conservative methods. Previous studies have shown a complete reduction in excess volume in limbs with lymphedema when treated with liposuction and controlled compression therapy (CCT). We present the long-term outcomes of all patients treated with liposuction and CCT for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) who were followed up for 5 years.

METHODS

Sixty-seven LEL patients underwent liposuction and CCT. Thirty-six patients had primary lymphedema and 31 patients had secondary lymphedema. The outcomes included excess leg volume over a follow-up period of 5 years. Any association between patient characteristics and treatment outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

The preoperative excess volume prior was 3515 mL [interquartile range (IQR): 2225-5455 mL], and the volume ratio to the unaffected leg was 1.35 (IQR: 1.25-1.53). One year after treatment, the excess volume decreased by 101% (IQR: 84-116). The decrease in excess volume continued during the 5-year follow-up, and at the end of the study, the excess volume had decreased by 115% (IQR: 98-124). No major complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Liposuction and CCT are safe and effective procedures for removing excess adipose tissue and normalizing the leg volume in patients with late-stage LEL. When no satisfactory results are obtained with conservative methods, such as complex decongestive therapy, and there is no or minimal pitting on limb examination, excess adipose tissue is present, and liposuction can be considered.

Lessons Learnt from an 11-year Experience with Lymphatic Surgery and a Systematic Review of Reported Complications: Technical Considerations to Reduce Morbidity

Complications experienced during lymphatic surgery have not been ubiquitously reported, and little has been described regarding how to prevent them. We present a review of complications reported during the surgical management of lymphedema and our experience with technical considerations to reduce morbidity from lymphatic surgery. A comprehensive search across different databases was conducted through November 2020. Based on the complications identified, we discussed the best approach for reducing the incidence of complications during lymphatic surgery based on our experience. The most common complications reported following lymphovenous anastomosis were re-exploration of the anastomosis, venous reflux, and surgical site infection. The most common complications using groin vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), submental VLNT, lateral thoracic VLNT, and supraclavicular VLNT included delayed wound healing, seroma and hematoma formation, lymphatic fluid leakage, iatrogenic lymphedema, soft-tissue infection, venous congestion, marginal nerve pseudoparalysis, and partial flap loss. Regarding intra-abdominal lymph node flaps, incisional hernia, hematoma, lymphatic fluid leakage, and postoperative ileus were commonly reported. Following suction-assisted lipectomy, significant blood loss and transient paresthesia were frequently reported. The reported complications of excisional procedures included soft-tissue infections, seroma and hematoma formation, skin-graft loss, significant blood loss, and minor skin flap necrosis. Evidently, lymphedema continues to represent a challenging condition; however, thorough patient selection, compliance with physiotherapy, and an experienced surgeon with adequate understanding of the lymphatic system can help maximize the safety of lymphatic surgery.

Liposuction in cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema: an investigative study on clinical applications

Background

Lymphedema is a progressive, noncurable condition consisting of increases in subcutaneous fat and interstitial fluid in the limbs and fibrosis during later stages. The disease most commonly affects the limbs following injury to or removal of the lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic outcomes of liposuction for cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with cancer-related lymphedema in the unilateral lower extremity were recruited for this study, and all patients underwent liposuction. The volume of hemorrhage and lipids, the operation time, and the volume changes of the affected extremity were compared by applying the t tests, and the subjective feelings of patients were compared with the chi-square tests.

Results

The total lipid volume was 2539 ± 1253.5 ml, and the hemorrhage volume was 828 ± 311.8 ml. For the comparison of objective indices, (1) the percent volume differences (PVDs) before surgery, intraoperatively, and at the 3-month follow-up were 5.5 ± 12.2 vs. 11.6 ± 18.4 vs. 43.2 ± 23.7, P < 0.05, respectively; (2) greater lipid volumes and higher liposuction rates were observed for female patients, as was a smaller volume of hemorrhage; (3) greater hemorrhage volumes were observed in patients with a history of recurrent erysipelas; and (4) greater lipid volumes and liposuction rates (LRs) and smaller hemorrhage volumes were observed for stage II than for stage III patients.

Conclusions

Liposuction is an effective therapy for cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema. Sex, stage, and recurrent erysipelas history influence the course and effect of liposuction.

Advanced Technical Pearls for Successful Supermicrosurgical Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis

ABSTRACT

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is now accepted as one of the mainstays of surgical treatment of lymphedema. The unique advantages of LVA that set it apart from other procedures such as vascularized lymph node transfer are its safety and its minimally invasive nature. To date, there has been no report of worsening of disease as a result of LVA, even when performed unsuccessfully. Despite these notable advantages, the procedure is much less frequently performed compared with vascularized lymph node transfer because of inconsistent procedural outcome. In our experience, LVA is highly effective when performed with proper patient selection and meticulous technical execution. In this article, we share the senior author's LVA "tips and tricks" to help readers achieve greater success when performing this extraordinary supermicrosurgical procedure.

The Unresolved Pathophysiology of Lymphedema

Lymphedema is the clinical manifestation of impaired lymphatic transport. It remains an under-recognized and under-documented clinical condition that still lacks a cure. Despite the substantial advances in the understanding of lymphatic vessel biology and function in the past two decades, there are still unsolved questions regarding the pathophysiology of lymphedema, especially in humans. As a consequence of impaired lymphatic drainage, proteins and lipids accumulate in the interstitial space, causing the regional tissue to undergo extensive and progressive architectural changes, including adipose tissue deposition and fibrosis. These changes are also associated with inflammation. However, the temporal sequence of these events, the relationship between these events, and their interplay during the progression are not clearly understood. Here, we review our current knowledge on the pathophysiology of lymphedema derived from human and animal studies. We also discuss the possible cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in adipose tissue and collagen accumulation during lymphedema. We suggest that more studies should be dedicated to enhancing our understanding of the human pathophysiology of lymphedema to pave the way for new diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for this condition.