Factors Associated With Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Older Adults After Myocardial Infarction: THE SILVER-AMI STUDY

Nurse-Led Cardiac Rehabilitation Care Coordination Program: Improving Functional Outcomes for Patients Through Automatic Referral and Effective Care Coordination

PURPOSE

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of automated cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and nurse care coordination on patient and program outcomes. Specifically, the aim was to identify whether differences exist in physical and psychological function at CR Phase 2 enrollment and completion and CR Phase 2 participation and completion for hospitalized patients who receive in-person CR nurse visits versus phone consultation. Using a retrospective pre-/post-intervention descriptive design, a purposive sampling technique was used to select groups with matching clinical attributes. Dates were selected to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on CR program enrollment and completion.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from the patient electronic medical record, telemetry documentation, and CR referral tracking tool. Patient descriptors included age, sex, cardiac diagnosis/procedure (post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, heart failure, and aortic valve repair and replacement) and cardiac risk stratification category. Patient functional outcomes included the 6-min walk test and metabolic equivalents of task levels for functional capacity; psychological function was measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire assessment. Program outcomes included discharge to CR Phase 2 enrollment, CR sessions, and completion.

RESULTS

Each group had 52 patients. Age was 64 ± 12 yr, 68% were male. Perhaps indications for CR included coronary artery bypass graft surgery (44%), myocardial infarction (19%), percutaneous coronary intervention (20%), heart failure (10%), aortic valve repair and replacement (8%). Cardiac risk was low in 30%, intermediate in 65%, and high in 5%. The post-intervention group compared with the pre-intervention group had a shorter discharge to CR Phase 2 enrollment (35 ± 18 d vs 41 ± 28 d, P = .078) and significantly fewer sessions required for CR completion.

CONCLUSION

Automated CR referral and nurse care coordination visits for hospitalized patients decreased the transition period between CR Phase 1 and 2. Patients were physically and psychologically prepared for earlier CR Phase 2 enrollment and successfully completed the program in fewer days than the pre-intervention group.

The relationship between discharge location and cardiac rehabilitation use after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-recommended risk-reduction program offered to cardiac surgical patients. Despite CR's association with better outcomes, attendance remains poor. The relationship between discharge location and CR use is poorly understood.

METHODS

This study was a nationwide, retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare fee-for-service claims for beneficiaries undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or surgical aortic valve repair between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was attendance of any CR session. Discharge location was categorized as home discharge or discharge to extended care facility (ECF) (including skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation, and long-term acute care). Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association between discharge location, CR attendance, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 167,966 patients who met inclusion criteria, 34.1% discharged to an ECF. Overall CR usage rate was 53.9%. Unadjusted and adjusted CR use was lower among patients discharged ECFs versus those discharged home (42.1% vs 60.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; P < .001). Patients discharged to long-term acute care were less likely to use CR than those discharged to skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation (reference category: home; adjusted odds ratio for long-term acute care, 0.36, adjusted odds ratio for skilled nursing facility, 0.69, and adjusted odds ratio for inpatient rehabilitation, 0.71; P < .001). CR attendance was associated with a greater reduction in adjusted 1-year mortality in patients discharged to ECFs (9.7% reduction) versus those discharged home (4.3% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis of Medicare beneficiaries, discharge to ECF was associated with lower CR use, despite a greater association with improved 1-year mortality. Interventions aimed at increasing CR enrollment at ECFs may improve CR use and advance surgical quality.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Coronary Heart Disease

PURPOSE

While cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended and effective following acute cardiac events, it remains underutilized, particularly in older adults. A study of 601 099 Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 yr hospitalized for coronary heart disease compared 5-yr mortality in users and nonusers of CR. Using instrumental variables (IV), CR improved mortality by 8.0% ( P < .001). A validation analysis based on 70 040 propensity-based (PB) matched pairs gave a similar gain (8.3%, P < .0001). The present cost-effectiveness analysis builds on these mortality results.

METHODS

Using the framework of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) gained due to CR. We accessed the costs from this cohort, inflated to 2022 prices, and assessed the relationship of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) to life years from a systematic review. We estimated the ICER of CR by modeling lifetime costs and QALY from national life tables using IV and PB.

RESULTS

Using IV, CR added 1.344 QALY (95% CI, 0.543-2.144) and $40 472 in costs over the remaining lifetimes of participants. The ICER was $30 188 (95% CI, $18 175-$74 484)/QALY over their lifetimes. Using the PB analysis, the corresponding lifetime values were 2.018 (95% CI, 1.001-3.035) QALY, $66 590, and an ICER of $32 996 (95% CI, $21 942-$66 494)/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac rehabilitation was highly cost-effective using guidelines established by the World Health Organization and the US Department of Health and Human Services. The favorable clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CR, along with low use by Medicare beneficiaries, support the need to increase CR use.

Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A review of bibliometric studies and visual analysis of CiteSpace (2012-2021)

Home-based cardiac rehabilitation has been a major area in cardiac rehabilitation research for a long time. However, there are few systematic studies in this field using bibliometric analysis. We collected articles and reviews for home-based cardiac rehabilitation from the Web of Science Core Collection. Our objectives were to perform a bibliometric analysis and visualization study to determine hotspots and trends of home-based cardiac rehabilitation, identify collaboration and influence among authors, countries, institutions, and journals, and assess the knowledge base to develop clinical research in the future. This study will provide a valuable reference for researchers concerned with HBCR.