Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Solutions in Removing Cholesterol Deposits From Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

Analysis of Deposition and Diffusion of Cholesterol in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses Using Confocal Microscopy

In this study, we investigated lipid deposition and diffusion in silicone hydrogel (Si-Hy) contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Different Si-Hy lenses were analyzed to understand the interaction patterns of cholesterol with various lens materials. The results highlight significant differences in the deposition and diffusion of lipids through the lenses, revealing that some materials, such as comfilcon A, allow lipids to diffuse more freely compared to others, such as samfilcon A, which provides a greater barrier. The study also observed different morphology and movement of lipid agglomerates across the lenses and above it surfaces. These findings contribute to the understanding of lipid-lens interaction, which is important for the development of lenses with improved comfort and functionality. The research highlights the importance of considering lipid interactions in the design and selection of Si-Hy contact lenses to enhance wearer comfort and lens performance.

Multi-purpose Disinfecting Solutions only Partially Inhibit the Development of Ocular Microbes Biofilms in Contact Lens Storage Cases

PURPOSE

Certain ocular resident or pathogenic microbes may remain viable in the presence of multi-purpose disinfectant solutions (MPDSs), subsequently developing biofilms inside contact lens storage cases (CLSCs) which pose a risk of infection to wearers. This study evaluated the formation of ocular microbiota biofilms exposed to three top selling MPDS.

METHODS

Crystal violet assay was carried out for the verification of biofilm formation. The in vitro assays evaluated Pseudomonas aeruginosa UFPEDA 416 and Staphylococcus aureus UFPEDA 02 exposure of 48 h to MPDS, as well as the use of 40 KHz ultrasound at the beginning and with 24 h immersion in the MPDS. Subsequently, in vivo assays evaluated the formation of microbial biofilms on the CLSC walls containing silicone-hydrogel contact lenses immersed in MPDS from 15 healthy volunteer patients, who had been wearing the lenses for 7 days.

RESULTS

Biofilms were inhibited by 26%-98% in the in vitro assays, with a statistically significant difference only for P. aeruginosa UFPEDA 416 exposed to diluted MPDS. Most inhibitions occurred moderately and weakly. In addition, adherent cells were detected in more than 90% of the tests. Biofilm was not inhibited in more than one third of the results, nor was it disturbed, especially with the ultrasound treatments. The average of obtained optical densities at 590 nm was between 0.6 and 0.8 in the in vivo assays. The results were similar between the CLSC right and left wells. There was a correlation between microbial biofilm formation and the type of MPDS tested, with statistical difference between the three treatments.

CONCLUSION

MPDS promoted a partial inhibition of microbial biofilm formation but only one MPDS proved to be more effective in vitro and in vivo. This study, however, could not distinguish the effect of possible errors in the good hygiene practices of the users.

A method for studying lipid adsorption to silicone hydrogel contact lenses

The aim of this study was to develop an experimental methodology to measure lipid deposition with contact lenses. Contact lenses were incubated in a lipid solution. The amount and types of adsorbed lipids were assessed using mass spectrometry and confocal microscopy. The recovery of lipids from lenses varied with lipid and lens type. Most non-polar and polar lipids were desorbed from lenses during the first 5 min of extraction. Fluorescently labelled phosphatidylcholine bound within the matrix of Senofilcon A lenses but to the surface of Lotrafilcon B lenses, whereas fluorescently labelled cholesteryl ester was found throughout both lenses. The efficacy of extraction of lipids from contact lenses varies for different lipid classes and different lens materials. Differences in the amount and time of lipid desorption probably resulted from the strength of the bond between lipid and lens polymer and the depth of adsorption of lipid in the polymer.

Lipid Analysis on Block Copolymer-containing Packaging Solution and Lens Care Regimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial

SIGNIFICANCE

Lotrafilcon B lenses packaged in and cared for with block copolymer-containing (polyoxyethylene-polyoxybutylene; EOBO) lens care solutions resulted in lower cholesterol extraction than each of the habitual silicone hydrogel lens/multipurpose solution (MPS) regimens tested.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the extracted cholesterol of lotrafilcon B lenses packaged in and cared for with EOBO-containing lens care solutions with the extracted cholesterol of habitual silicone hydrogel lenses cared for with MPS not containing EOBO.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, observer-masked parallel study, habitual wearers of senofilcon C, senofilcon A, comfilcon A, and samfilcon A contact lenses using a non-EOBO MPS were randomized 1:1 to lotrafilcon B lenses packaged in and cared for with EOBO-containing solutions or to their habitual lenses and MPS. Subjects randomized to lotrafilcon B were further randomized to one of two EOBO-containing lens care solutions, OPTI-FREE PUREMOIST or CLEAR CARE PLUS with HydraGlyde (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). A subset of right eye lenses was collected after wear, and total cholesterol was extracted and measured using a fluorometric enzymatic assay.

RESULTS

Of 143 lenses analyzed, 95 were from subjects randomized to their habitual lenses/MPS and 48 to lotrafilcon B + EOBO lenses plus CLEAR CARE PLUS with HydraGlyde or OPTI-FREE PUREMOIST. The mean amounts of cholesterol extracted from lotrafilcon B + EOBO lenses cared for with CLEAR CARE PLUS with HydraGlyde (0.28 ± 0.18 μg/lens) and OPTI-FREE PUREMOIST (0.28 ± 0.48 μg/lens) were significantly lower than those extracted from senofilcon C (4.18 ± 3.25 μg/lens), senofilcon A (2.19 ± 2.69 μg/lens), comfilcon A (2.17 ± 1.47 μg/lens), and samfilcon A (2.07 ± 1.48 μg/lens) lenses used with MPS (P < .0001 each).

CONCLUSIONS

Cholesterol sorption was significantly lower in wearers of lotrafilcon B lenses cared for with polyoxyethylene-polyoxybutylene-containing lens care solutions than in users of habitual silicone hydrogel lenses cared for with non-polyoxyethylene-polyoxybutylene MPS.

To rub or not to rub? - effective rigid contact lens cleaning

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of cleaning of rigid contact lenses using two care solutions with and without rubbing.

METHODS

A masked randomised trial was conducted. The cleaning efficacy of two solutions recommended for rigid contact lenses, a one-step hydrogen peroxide solution (HP) and a povidone iodine-based solution (PI), were evaluated on 64 unworn orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses subsequent to cleaning with rubbing (R) with a surfactant cleaner or without rubbing (NR). Either mascara or hand cream was applied as a contaminant to the lenses to simulate stubborn and loosely bounded deposits, respectively. For each type of deposit, the lenses were randomly assigned to four cleaning treatments: R with HP, NR with HP, R with PI, and NR with PI (n = 8 for each group). Each lens surface was assessed on site by a masked examiner under a low-magnification slit-lamp and with photo-documentation. Lenses were graded according to the deposit coverage area using a pre-set five-point scale [0 (<20% coverage) - 4 (>80% coverage)].

RESULTS

For stubborn deposits (mascara), NR failed to remove deposits from 94% of lenses, whilst R removed more than 80% of deposits from 63% of the lenses. For oily deposits, 25% of NR lenses had >80% coverage, whilst only one R lens had 60-80% coverage, with 19% having 40-60% coverage, and 38% with either 20-40% or <20%. Rubbing improved lens cleanliness for both types of deposits, but only reached statistical significance for the stubborn deposit group. There were no significant differences between the solutions.

CONCLUSION

Not Rubbing and using either HP or PI solutions, is not effective in removing stubborn deposits from ortho-k lenses. It is essential to rub lenses when cleaning rigid lenses to ensure optimal lens hygiene for ocular health, especially as rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses are intended to be reused for at least a year before replacement. Rubbing with a daily cleaner should be included in the instructions for use of the solutions tested for rigid lenses and practitioners should be encouraged to emphasise the importance of rubbing in lens care.