Surgical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; one procedure for all versus all procedures for one

Comparative efficacy of probing with or without intubation, and/or inferior turbinate fracture in simple congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a randomized clinical trial

To compare the success rates of probing with or without monocanalicular intubation, and/or inferior turbinate fracture in resolving simple congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on children aged 12-36 months exhibiting symptoms of epiphora and/or mucous discharge along with a positive fluorescein dye disappearance test (DDT). Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following interventions: (1) probing; (2) probing and monocanalicular intubation; (3) probing and inferior turbinate fracture; (4) probing, inferior turbinate fracture, and monocanalicular intubation. Participants were categorized into two age groups (12-24 months and 24-36 months) and assessed for resolution of CNLDO three months post-surgery. Success was defined as the absence of epiphora or mucopurulent discharge and a negative DDT. Among the 201 participants, 51 underwent probing alone, 53 underwent probing with intubation, 47 underwent probing with turbinate fracture, and 50 underwent probing with turbinate fracture and intubation. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, or laterality of the disease between the groups (Ps > 0.05). While there was no significant difference in success rates among interventions in both age groups (Ps > 0.05), patients aged 24-36 months who underwent interventions involving intubation exhibited a significantly higher success rate compared to those without intubation (93.0% vs. 76.2%; P = 0.018). However, this difference was not observed in patients aged 12-24 months (95.7% vs. 92.9%; P = 0.551). Incorporating interventions such as intubation and/or turbinate fracture alongside conventional probing does not significantly alter the success rate of simple CNLDO resolution in children aged 12-24 months. However, older patients (24-36 months) may derive greater benefits from interventions involving intubation.

Probing and nasolacrimal intubation outcomes in children over 18 Months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Purpose

To evaluate how risk factors impact success rates of initial probing and nasolacrimal duct (NLD) tube intubation in children over 18 months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

Methods

This cohort study included 98 CNLDO patients aged 18 months to 10 years who underwent NLD probing with stent insertion. We employed the multivariate frailty model as our final model to conceptually elaborate on our correlated eye data, with the primary outcome measure evaluating the success rates of probing and tube intubation. Factors such as age, probing complexity, tube type, prior surgeries, and passive smoking were considered in the evaluation.

Results

The study involved 98 patients (54 males, 44 females) with a mean age of 41.46 months and an average follow-up of 98.37 days (95 % CI 87.65-109.1). Out of the 110 eyes that underwent surgery, 13 (11.8 %) experienced failure while 97 (88.2 %) were censored. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significant differences in age category and probing (P-value = 0.03 and 0.006 respectively), but not tube type (P-value = 0.8). Multivariable analysis confirmed that older age and complex probing were associated with higher failure rates in CNLDO cases, with each monthly increase correlating to a two percent higher likelihood of intubation failure.

Conclusions

Patient age and probing complexity influence CNLDO treatment, impacting surgical techniques and outcomes. Tube type, prior surgery, and passive smoking have no significant impact on treatment success.

Assessing the success rate of treatment in simple and complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the success rate (SR) of probing and intubation in patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for identifying relevant studies published in English using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from the date of inception to Feb 2023. After extracting data, the SR was compared between the study groups: simple and complex CNLDO. To compare the treatment outcome, the mean difference of the SR was considered as the effect size. Random effects model or fixed effects model were performed for statistical inferences.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were eligible to be analyzed. The pooled SR of treatment was 88% in simple, and 57% in complex CNLDO. Exerting intubation in increased the SR from 87% (SR of probing) to 92% in simple CNLDO which was not significant. However, compared to probing, intubation has a significantly higher SR in complex CNLDO (46 to 82%). While the SR of probing was significantly lower in complex CNLDO, the difference between the SR of intubation was not significant between groups. Although increasing the age does not have an adverse effect on the SR in simple CNDLO, it causes a significant decrease in the SR of complex group.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that even though the addition of NLD intubation does not provide significant benefits beyond probing alone for patients with simple CNLDO, in children with complex CNLDO, NLD intubation should be considered as a primary treatment due to its substantial increase in surgical success rates. Delaying the treatment would increase its success in patients with complex but not the simple CNLDO.

Management and outcomes of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in trisomy 21 patients vs. non-trisomy 21 patients within a paediatric population: a 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To assess the management of patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in a paediatric population and review the long-term outcomes over a 5-year interval, with particular emphasis on the difference between patients with trisomy 21 and those without trisomy 21.

METHODS

This single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional, case review study included patients suffering from CNLDO at Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS foundation Trust. Patients were divided into two groups: Non-trisomy 21 and trisomy 21. Patients were followed-up for a 60-month interval. Patients aged <12 months at the time of surgery, patients with <60 months of follow-up data and patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were excluded. The main outcome measures were discharge rates in patients undertaking primary intervention with syringe and probe (S&P), number of patients requiring further treatment with lacrimal intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and overall symptom-free periods post-treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (142 eyes) were included. The mean number of surgical interventions was 1.53 ± 0.65. The mean interval between the 1st and 2nd intervention was 15.54 ± 16.33 months. There was a trend towards greater success rates non-trisomy 21 patients versus patients with trisomy 21 (p = 0.1352). The average symptom-free period after the final intervention was 44.31 ± 20.68 months, significantly longer in the non-trisomy 21 group compared to the trisomy 21 group (p = 0.0074).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success rate after primary S&P was 55.9%. Our results suggest that in trisomy 21 patients suffering from CNLDO, a one-stage intervention with primary monocanalicular intubation should be considered instead of sequential approach.

Balloon dacryoplasty: A boon for dacryologists in managing persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of balloon dacryoplasty (BD) or (BDCP) in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (pCNLDO) by using new and reused balloon catheters.

METHODS

Our retrospective analysis focused on managing pCNLDO by using the BD or BDCP technique. The study included children aged >1 year to <12 years who underwent single or multiple probings before. Our specific lacrimal workup included a detailed history and examination, as published earlier. We used conventional, straight, 2 mm × 13 mm/3 mm × 15 mm lacrimal balloons (FCI, Ophthacath). We have described a technique to use the same catheter for three BD procedures (1 new + 2 reuse). The outcomes were categorized as complete success, partial success, and failure. The minimum follow-up of each child was 6 months.

RESULTS

We analyzed 64 children (89 eyes) with a mean age of 58 months (15-132 months). All children (100%) had epiphora with discharge and positive FDDT. All children underwent BD under general anesthesia - new balloons in 59 eyes and reused balloons in 30 eyes. The balloons were plasma sterilized akin to vitrectomy cutters and tubings of phaco machines. We noted three leaks from reused balloons (2 from the balloon tip and 1 from the plastic hub). At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete success was noted in 77 eyes (86.5%) (52 new and 25 reuse), while 8 eyes had partial success (8.9%) (4 new and 4 reuse). Failure of BD was noted in four eyes (4.5%) (3 new and 1 reuse). None had significant complications with new or reused balloons.

CONCLUSION

BD or BDCP is a quick, safe, easy, and effective procedure that resolves pCNLDO symptoms satisfactorily. Carefully reusing a conventional balloon catheter is possible with comparable efficacy and no additional complications in pCNLDO.

Morphometric and morphological evaluation of the nasolacrimal groove in 150 dry bones in the Anatolian population

PUPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the anatomical features of the nasolacrimal groove in detail by providing a morphological classification based on morphometric evaluations of the nasolacrimal groove.

METHODS

A total of 150 sagittal dry bones in the Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University were evaluated. The length and the width at different points of the nasolacrimal canal were calculated. According to the widths of the nasolacrimal canal ten different morphological types were revealed.

RESULTS

The length of the canal was found as mean 13.62 ± 2.42 mm on the right and 12.44 ± 2.68 mm on the left side. The entrance, the base, the upper and the lower thirds of nasolacrimal canal were 6.22 ± 1.19 mm, 7.95 ± 1.85 mm, 5.85 ± 1.06 mm, 6.60 ± 1.54 mm, on the right and 6.08 ± 1.16 mm, 7.24 ± 1.64 mm, 5.45 ± 1.29 mm, 6.23 ± 1.48 mm, on the left side, respectively. The width of the entrance of the nasolacrimal canal was the narrowest width compared to the base, upper and lower thirds in 7/10 types of 71/150 cranial bones.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive morphological classification of the nasolacrimal groove sheds new light on its complex variations. We support that the finding of this study has the potential to improve the precision of diagnostic assessments and guide specific therapeutic interventions for patients with lacrimal drainage disorders.

Retrospective analysis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction outcomes in a tertiary referral center

Background

The aim of this study was to profile patients with simple and complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) and to determine the success rates of interventions at a third-level referral center.

Methods

In this retrospective and comparative study, medical records of patients with CNLDO were reviewed. Demographic data, types of CNLDO, surgical approach, type of silicone intubation, as well as outcome were recorded up to 3 months after the intervention. Obstruction location was identified by probing and irrigation following the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) approach. Success rates were calculated for treatment approach and age group.

Results

Based on the outcome of 130 eyes with CNLDO, the overall success rate was 96%. The mean age of patients was 2.5 ± 2.2 months; 73% of cases were simple and 27% were complex CNLDO. Five children had to undergo reoperation; consequently, there was a lower success rate in the complex CNLDO (91%) than in the simple CNLDO subgroup (97%). There was a male predominance (61.5%), which was also present in the simple and complex CNLDO subgroups. The most frequent type of CNLDO was complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO, 55.4%), followed by partial (17.7%) and bony NLDO (11.5%). In 87% of eyes, initial probing was performed followed by dacryocystorhinostomy (10%). Mono- or bi-canalicular lacrimal drainage system intubation was used in 86% of eyes.

Conclusion

The AAO-based diagnostic approach followed by an individualized treatment regimen yielded excellent success rates of 96% in unselected patients with CNLDO. These success rates were independent of patient age or gender.

Age-Specific Outcomes of Conservative Approach and Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Purpose

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Outcomes of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Surgery Converted into Balloon Dilation and Silicone Intubation due to Probing Difficulty

Background. To report the outcomes of balloon catheter dilatation and silicone intubation as a sequential secondary surgery under the same anesthesia, a stepwise approach for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) when probing and irrigation as primary procedure fails. Methods. A retrospective study included children with NLDO who underwent probing and irrigation only, and those who underwent in the same surgery under anesthesia, adjunct balloon catheter dilation and silicone intubation due to difficulty of the probe passage or fluid regurgitation from the punctum. The primary outcome was surgical success defined as resolution of preoperative symptoms and signs at 1 month. Results. A total of 105 NLDO cases were included. Eighty-four cases underwent probing and irrigation only, whereas 21 cases required balloon dilation and silicone intubation consecutively after the first procedure. Patient age at surgery was higher for those requiring balloon dilatation and intubation (30.3 ± 8.0 months) when compared to those with probing and irrigation only (22.4 ± 10.3 months, $p<0.001$ ). The onset of symptoms, preoperative clinical findings regarding tearing and discharge and gender distribution of patients were comparable between the two groups. During the follow-up, the overall success rate for probing and irrigation only was 76.2% (64 out of 84 cases) and for balloon dilatation and silicone tube intubation was 90.5% (19 out of 21 cases). Conclusions. The surgical team may prepare to proceed with secondary surgery under the same anesthesia after the initial attempt of probing and irrigation. This stepwise two-stage approach in patients with congenital NLDO failing primary surgery resulted in a high success rate with minimal interventions, avoiding repeated general anesthesia.

Dacryoendoscopy-assisted incision of Hasner's valve under nasoendoscopy for membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after probing failure: a retrospective study

Background

To introduce a treatment option: dacryoendoscopy-assisted incision of Hasner’s valve under nasoendoscopy and assess its efficacy in treating membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children older than 1 year with history of initial probing failure.

Methods

52 eyes of 43 children with membranous CNLDO who underwent dacryoendoscopy-assisted incision of Hasner’s valve under nasoendoscopy between May 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. All participants were older than 1 year and all the eyes had gone through probing at least once but still had symptoms of epiphora and discharge. Surgical success was defined as a normal fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) and the absence of pre-operation complaints, including epiphora, muco-purulent discharge, increased tear lake or the symptoms of acute infection such as acute dacryocystitis. Patients’ demographics, clinical features and follow-up outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Of all these operated cases, surgical success was achieved in 52/52 eyes without any early or late complications. The overall success rate was 100%.

Conclusions

Dacryoendoscopy-assisted incision of Hasner’s valve under nasoendoscopy is an effective and minimally invasive surgical treatment in membranous CNLDO patients with initial probing failure.

Application Possibilities of a New Preloaded Nasolacrimal Duct Intubation System

INTRODUCTION

The LacriJet (FCI S. A. S. - France Chirurgie Instrumentation, Paris, France) represents a novel, simplified and preloaded system for monocanalicular or monocanaliculonasal nasolacrimal duct intubation. It is a further development of the Masterka and shall reduce the intubation time during the surgical procedure. The aim of the present study was to present first experiences with this system for different indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who underwent nasolacrimal duct intubation with the LacriJet at the University of Muenster Medical Center in the period from March to November 2019 were included. The postoperative outcome was evaluated 3 to 6 months later.

RESULTS

In total, 12 nasolacrimal duct intubations with the LacriJet were performed at our center in the above-mentioned period. The main indication for intubation was congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). In addition, intubation was performed in cases with eye lid tumors involving the nasolacrimal duct, in a case of canalicular laceration and in a case of canaliculitis. In 3 cases, there was an early dislocation or a complete loss of intubation. Of these, 2 were cases with CNLDO and the third dislocation was due to manipulation by the patient. All in all, the functional results were satisfying.

SUMMARY

The use of the LacriJet is highly suitable for the treatment of CNLDO, stenting in canalicular laceration or lid tumours involving the lacrimal drainage system. However, the known disadvantages of monocanalicular intubation (dislocation, early loss of intubation) also occur with this type of system and a system briefing seems useful. The LacriJet therefore represents a modern and simple method for nasolacrimal duct intubation and can be used for various indications.

Comparison of Hasner valvulotomy outcomes in pediatric and adult patients: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

Hasner valve incision has been recently introduced as a new treatment for ophthalmic patients with epiphora symptoms. The aim of this study was to examine whether surgical outcomes of Hasner valve incision for inferior nasolacrimal duct obstruction were different between pediatric and adult patients.

METHODS

A total of 53 eyes of 52 patients who underwent Hasner valve incision in the Beijing Tongren Hospital from October 2016 to November 2019 were retrospectively observed. Patients were divided into two groups, including pediatric group (23 eyes of 22 patients, <18 years old) and adult group (30 eyes of 30 patients, ≥18 years old). Success rate of surgery was determined by both subjective measure (complete resolution of epiphora) and objective measure (lacrimal passage irrigation and tear meniscus height). Fisher exact test was conducted.

RESULTS

By conducting Fisher exact test and comparing complete resolution of epiphora (P = 0.627), lacrimal passage irrigation (P = 0.663), measurement of Tear Meniscus Height (P = 0.561), and appearance of complication (P = 0.339), there was no statistically significant difference of surgical outcomes between pediatric and adult patients (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hasner valve incision was effective for both adult and children with inferior nasolacrimal duct obstruction, with no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups.