Trunk Muscle Function Deficit in Youth Baseball Pitchers With Excessive Contralateral Trunk Tilt During Pitching

Effects of repetitive baseball throwing on hip muscle strength and trunk and pelvic motions at the shoulder's maximum external rotation position during the late cocking phase and ball release

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the changes in the trunk and pelvic lateral tilt angles at the shoulder's maximum external rotation during the late cocking phase (MER) and ball release (BR) and hip muscle strength during repetitive throwing. [Participants and Methods] In this study, 12 male baseball players participated. During the throwing, which was filmed using a high-speed video camera, the trunk and pelvic lateral tilt angles toward the nonthrowing side were measured at the MER and BR. Hip muscle strength during abduction, adduction, and external internal rotations were measured on the throwing and nonthrowing sides. Repetitive throwing was performed for nine innings, with 15 pitches per inning. Throwing motion was compared during innings 1, 7, 8, and 9. Hip muscle strength was measured before and after repetitive throwing. [Results] Compared with the trunk lateral tilt angle toward the nonthrowing side at BR in inning 1, the angle in innings 8 and 9 increased. The strength of hip abduction, adduction, and external and internal rotations on the throwing and nonthrowing sides decreased after repetitive throwing. [Conclusion] Hip muscle strength decreases after 135 pitches, and throwing >120 pitches changes the trunk lateral tilt angle at BR.

Effects of Contralateral Trunk Tilt on Shoulder and Elbow Injury Risk and Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Baseball pitchers employ various contralateral trunk tilt (CTT) positions when pitching depending on if they have an overhand, three-quarter, or sidearm delivery. There are no known studies that have examined how pitching biomechanics are significantly different in professional pitchers with varying amounts of CTT, which may provide insight into shoulder and elbow injury risk among pitchers with different CTT.

PURPOSE

To assess differences in shoulder and elbow forces and torques and baseball pitching biomechanics in professional pitchers with maximum 30° to 40° CTT (MaxCTT), moderate 15° to 25° CTT (ModCTT), and minimum 0° to 10° CTT (MinCTT).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In total, 215 pitchers were examined, including 46 pitchers with MaxCTT, 126 pitchers with ModCTT, and 43 pitchers with MinCTT. All pitchers were tested using a 240-Hz, 10-camera motion analysis system, and 37 kinematic and kinetic parameters were calculated. Differences in kinematic and kinetic variables among the 3 CTT groups were assessed with a 1-way analysis of variance (P < .01).

RESULTS

Maximum shoulder anterior force and maximum elbow proximal force were significantly greater in ModCTT (403 ± 79 N) than MaxCTT (369 ± 75 N) and MinCTT (364 ± 70 N), while maximum elbow flexion torque and shoulder proximal force, respectively, were significantly greater in ModCTT (69 ± 11 N·m and 1176 ± 152 N, respectively) than MaxCTT (62 ± 12 N·m and 1085 ± 119 N, respectively). During arm cocking, maximum pelvis angular velocity was greater in MinCTT than MaxCTT and ModCTT, and maximum upper trunk angular velocity was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT. At ball release, trunk forward tilt was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and greater in MaxCTT than ModCTT, while arm slot angle was less in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and less in MaxCTT than ModCTT.

CONCLUSION

The greatest shoulder and elbow peak forces occurred in ModCTT, which occurs in pitchers who throw with a three-quarter arm slot. More research is needed to assess if pitchers with ModCTT are at a higher risk of shoulder and elbow injury compared with pitchers with MaxCTT (overhand arm slot) and MinCTT (sidearm arm slot), although in the pitching literature, excessive elbow and shoulder forces and torques have been shown to correlate with elbow and shoulder injuries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results from the current study will help clinicians better understand if differences in kinematic and kinetic measures differ with pitching, or if differences in force, torque, and arm position occur at different arm slots.

The Clinician's Guide to Baseball Pitching Biomechanics

CONTEXT

Improper baseball pitching biomechanics are associated with increased stresses on the throwing elbow and shoulder as well as an increased risk of injury.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Previous studies quantifying pitching kinematics and kinetics were reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

RESULTS

At the instant of lead foot contact, the elbow should be flexed approximately 90° with the shoulder at about 90° abduction, 20° horizontal abduction, and 45° external rotation. The stride length should be about 85% of the pitcher's height with the lead foot in a slightly closed position. The pelvis should be rotated slightly open toward home plate with the upper torso in line with the pitching direction. Improper shoulder external rotation at foot contact is associated with increased elbow and shoulder torques and forces and may be corrected by changing the stride length and/or arm path. From foot contact to maximum shoulder external rotation to ball release, the pitcher should demonstrate a kinematic chain of lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, upper trunk rotation, elbow extension, and shoulder internal rotation. The lead knee should be flexed about 45° at foot contact and 30° at ball release. Corrective strategies for insufficient knee extension may involve technical issues (stride length, lead foot position, lead foot orientation) and/or strength and conditioning of the lower body. Improper pelvis and upper trunk rotation often indicate the need for core strength and flexibility. Maximum shoulder external rotation should be about 170°. Insufficient external rotation leads to low shoulder internal rotation velocity and low ball velocity. Deviation from 90° abduction decreases the ability to achieve maximum external rotation, increases elbow torque, and decreases the dynamic stability in the glenohumeral joint.

CONCLUSION

Improved pitching biomechanics can increase performance and reduce risk of injury.

SORT

Level C.

Induced power analysis of sequential body motion and elbow valgus load during baseball pitching

The flow of mechanical energy of segmental motion during baseball pitching is poorly understood, particularly in relation to the valgus torque at the elbow which is prone to pitching-related injuries. This study employed an induced power analysis to determine the components of muscle and velocity-dependent torques that contribute to the power of throwing arm segments when the elbow is under valgus load during the arm-cocking phase of pitching. The 3D throwing kinematics and kinetics of 10 adult pitchers were included in this analysis. Pitchers threw with a maximum elbow valgus torque of 73 ± 20 N•m. The trunk flexion and rotation components of the velocity-dependent torque were the greatest contributors to the work of the forearm at -0.53 ± 0.22 J/kg and -0.43 ± 0.21 J/kg, respectively. Approximately 86% of the total energy transferred through the elbow by the velocity-dependent torque was due to trunk motion, which appears to drive the power of accelerating the throwing elbow in valgus. These results support the importance of trunk motion as a key component in the development of elbow torque and ball velocity. Therefore, this study has practical implications for baseball pitchers seeking to minimise injury risk while improving performance.