EGFR mutation and brain metastasis in pulmonary adenocarcinomas

Machine learning-driven prediction of brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma using miRNA profile and target gene pathway analysis of an mRNA dataset

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) is common in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and has a poor prognosis, necessitating predictive biomarkers. MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) promote cancer cell growth, infiltration, and metastasis. However, the relationship between the miRNA expression profiles and BM occurrence in patients with LUAD remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis to identify miRNAs in tissue samples that exhibited different expression levels between patients with and without BM. Using a machine learning approach, we confirmed whether the miRNA profile could be a predictive tool for BM. We performed pathway analysis of miRNA target genes using a matched mRNA dataset.

RESULTS

We selected 25 miRNAs that consistently exhibited differential expression between the two groups of 32 samples. The 25-miRNA profile demonstrated a strong predictive potential for BM in both Group 1 and Group 2 and the entire dataset (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.918, accuracy = 0.875 in Group 1; AUC = 0.867, accuracy = 0.781 in Group 2; and AUC = 0.908, accuracy = 0.875 in the entire group). Patients predicted to have BM, based on the 25-miRNA profile, had lower survival rates. Target gene analysis of miRNAs suggested that BM could be induced through the ErbB signaling pathway, proteoglycans in cancer, and the focal adhesion pathway. Furthermore, patients predicted to have BM based on the 25-miRNA profile exhibited higher expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature, TWIST, and vimentin than those not predicted to have BM. Specifically, there was a correlation between EGFR mRNA levels and BM.

CONCLUSIONS

This 25-miRNA profile may serve as a biomarker for predicting BM in patients with LUAD.

Enhancing intracranial efficacy prediction of osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer: a novel approach through brain MRI radiomics

Introduction

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, is known for its high efficacy against brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. This study aims to evaluate the use of brain MRI radiomics in predicting the intracranial efficacy to osimertinib in NSCLC patients with BM.

Materials and methods

This study analyzed 115 brain metastases from NSCLC patients with the EGFR-T790M mutation treated with second-line osimertinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial response, and the secondary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). We performed tumor delineation, image preprocessing, and radiomics feature extraction. Using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy, we built radiomic models with eight feature selectors and eight machine learning classifiers. The models' performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results

The dataset of 115 brain metastases was divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. The radiomic model utilizing the mRMR feature selector and stepwise logistic regression classifier showed the highest predictive accuracy, with AUCs of 0.879 for the training cohort and 0.786 for the validation cohort. This model outperformed a clinical-MRI morphological model, which included age, ring enhancement, and peritumoral edema (AUC: 0.794 for the training cohort and 0.697 for the validation cohort). The radiomic model also showed strong performance in calibration and decision curve analyses. Using a radiomic-score threshold of 199, patients were classified into two groups with significantly different median iPFS (3.0 months vs. 15.4 months, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that MRI radiomics can effectively predict the intracranial efficacy of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. This approach holds promise for assisting clinicians in personalizing treatment strategies.

Computed tomography-based radiomics and clinical-genetic features for brain metastasis prediction in patients with stage III/IV epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics combined with clinical-genetic features in predicting brain metastasis in patients with stage III/IV epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The study included 147 eligible patients treated at our institution between January 2018 and May 2021. Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts for model training (n = 102) and validation (n = 45). Radiomics features were extracted from the chest CT images before treatment, and a radiomics signature was constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to describe the differences in brain metastasis-free survival (BM-FS) risk. A clinical-genetic model was developed using Cox regression analysis. Radiomics, genetic, and combined prediction models were constructed, and their predictive performances were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Patients with a low radiomics score had significantly longer BM-FS than those with a high radiomics score in both the training (p < 0.0001) and the validation (p = 0.0016) cohorts. The C-indices of the nomogram, which combined the radiomics signature and N stage, overall stage, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, and EGFR mutation status, were 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.823-0.949) and 0.811 (95% CI 0.719-0.903) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model achieved a higher discrimination and clinical utility than the single prediction models.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined radiomics-genetic model could be used to predict BM-FS in stage III/IV NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

The Overlooked Cornerstone in Precise Medicine: Personalized Postoperative Surveillance Plan for NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer recurrence after curative-intent surgery remains a challenge despite advancements in treatment. We review postoperative surveillance strategies and their impact on overall survival, highlighting recommendations from clinical guidelines and controversies. Studies suggest no clear benefit from more intensive imaging, whereas computed tomography scans reveal promise in detecting recurrence. For early-stage disease, including ground-glass opacities and adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, less frequent surveillance may suffice owing to favorable prognosis. Liquid biopsy, especially circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, holds potential for detecting minimal residual disease. Clinicopathologic factors and genomic profiles can also provide information about site-specific metastases. Machine learning may enable personalized surveillance plans on the basis of multi-omics data. Although precision medicine transforms non-small cell lung cancer treatment, optimizing surveillance strategies remains essential. Tailored surveillance strategies and emerging technologies may enhance early detection and improve patients' survival, necessitating further research for evidence-based protocols.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Central Nervous System Neoplasms in Adults: CNS Metastases

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms, with an increasing incidence that is due in part to an overall increase in primary cancers, improved neuroimaging modalities leading to increased detection, better systemic therapies, and longer patient survival.

OBJECTIVE

To identify cancer patients at a higher risk of developing CNS metastases and to evaluate associated prognostic factors.

METHODS

Review of imaging referral guidelines, response criteria, interval imaging assessment, modality of choice, as well as the association of clinical, serological, and imaging findings as per various cancer societies.

RESULTS

Quantitative response assessment of target and non-target brain metastases as well as an interval imaging protocol set up based on primary histological diagnosis and therapy status are discussed as per various cancer societies and imaging programs.

CONCLUSION

Predictive factors in the primary tumor as well as independent variables of brain metastases like size, number, and response to therapy are necessary in management. The location of CNS metastases, symptomatic disease, as well as follow up imaging findings form a skeletal plan to prognosticate the disease, keeping in mind all the available new advanced therapy options of surgery, radiation, and immunotherapy that improve patient outcome significantly.

Post-Progression Analysis of EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Following Osimertinib Therapy in Real-World Settings

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the current standard treatment option in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on osimertinib. However, outcomes with chemotherapy are dismal, and the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disease is an unmet need in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were candidates to receive osimertinib in the metastatic setting at our Center from 2015 to 2022 were retrospectively evaluated to identify patients who received standard platinum-based chemotherapy post-osimertinib. Data were collected on treatment outcomes, with a focus on brain metastases and progression patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients received indication for osimertinib in the study period; n = 176 had adequate follow-up data. Overall, n = 117 patients experienced disease progression on osimertinib. The median time to osimertinib progressive disease (PD) was 15 months (95% confidence interval CI 13-18). Of them, 51 patients (45%) had no access to further treatments. Of the remaining patients, n = 8 received experimental treatments, and n = 55 received standard platinum-based chemotherapy and were considered for this study. Median duration of chemotherapy was 3 months (95% CI 2-5); the best responses among 53 evaluable patients were observed as follows: 15% partial response/complete response (PR/CR), 40% stable disease (SD), 45% PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3 (95% CI 2-5) and 10 (95% CI 6-15) months, respectively. All patients had baseline and follow-up brain radiologic assessments, and n = 23 had brain metastases at the start of chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 13 months, intracranial PD occurred in 47% patients, being the first site of PD in 59% of cases. The median time for intracranial (IC) PD was 2 months (95% CI 2-7). IC PD occurred as oligometastatic in 29%, whereas in 71% of cases, it was associated with systemic PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to subsequent treatments and CNS progression are confirmed unmet needs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Clinical and CNS-specific outcomes in patients receiving standard chemotherapy after the failure of osimertinib are dismal. Novel upfront treatment options with demonstrated prolonged PFS and better CNS outcomes may help address this important issue.

Central nervous system efficacy of aumolertinib versus gefitinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from a randomized phase III trial (AENEAS)

BACKGROUND

The initial randomized, double-blinded, actively controlled, phase III ANEAS study (NCT03849768) demonstrated that aumolertinib showed superior efficacy relative to gefitinib as first-line therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metastatic disease in the central nervous system (CNS) remains a challenge in the management of NSCLC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of aumolertinib versus gefitinib among patients with baseline CNS metastases in the ANEAS study.

METHODS

Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to orally receive either aumolertinib or gefitinib in a double-blinded fashion. Patients with asymptomatic, stable CNS metastases were included. Follow-up imaging of the same modality as the initial CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 15 months, then every 12 weeks. CNS response was assessed by a neuroradiological blinded, independent central review (neuroradiological-BICR). The primary endpoint for this subgroup analysis was CNS progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of the 429 patients enrolled and randomized in the ANEAS study, 106 patients were found to have CNS metastases (CNS Full Analysis Set, cFAS) at baseline by neuroradiological-BICR, and 60 of them had CNS target lesions (CNS Evaluable for Response, cEFR). Treatment with aumolertinib significantly prolonged median CNS PFS compared with gefitinib in both cFAS (29.0 vs. 8.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56; P < 0.001) and cEFR (29.0 vs. 8.3 months; HR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57; P < 0.001). The confirmed CNS overall response rate in cEFR was 85.7% and 75.0% in patients treated with aumolertinib and gefitinib, respectively. Competing risk analysis showed that the estimated probability of CNS progression without prior non-CNS progression or death was consistently lower with aumolertinib than with gefitinib in patients with and without CNS metastases at baseline. No new safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a potential advantage of aumolertinib over gefitinib in terms of CNS PFS and the risk of CNS progression in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with baseline CNS metastases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03849768.

Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated-mutated and ALK-fusion non-small cell lung cancer

The American Radium Society (ARS) Central Nervous System (CNS) committee reviewed literature on epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) and ALK-fusion (ALK+) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of brain metastases (BrMs) from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) to generate appropriate use guidelines addressing use of TKIs in conjunction with or in lieu of radiotherapy (RT). The panel developed three key questions to guide systematic review: can radiotherapy be deferred in patients receiving EGFR or ALK TKIs at (1) diagnosis or (2) recurrence? Should TKI be administered concurrently with RT (3)? Two literature searches were performed (May 2019 and December 2023). The panel developed 8 model cases and voted on treatment options using a 9-point scale, with 1-3, 4-6 and 7-9 corresponding to usually not appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually appropriate (respectively), per the UCLA/RAND Appropriateness Method. Consensus was achieved in only 4 treatment scenarios, all consistent with existing ARS-AUC guidelines for multiple BrM. The panel did not reach consensus that RT can be appropriately deferred in patients with BrM receiving CNS penetrant ALK or EGFR TKIs, though median scores indicated deferral may be appropriate under most circumstances. Whole brain RT with concurrent TKI generated broad disagreement except in cases with 2-4 BrM, where it was considered usually not appropriate. We identified no definitive studies dictating optimal sequencing of TKIs and RT for EGFRm and ALK+ BrM. Until such studies are completed, the committee hopes these cases guide decision- making in this complex clinical space.

Brain Metastasis from EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secretion of IL11 from Astrocytes Up-Regulates PDL1 and Promotes Immune Escape

Patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are more prone to brain metastasis (BM) and poor prognosis. Previous studies showed that the tumor microenvironment of BM in these patients is immunosuppressed, as indicated by reduced T-cell abundance and activity, although the mechanism of this immunosuppression requires further study. This study shows that reactive astrocytes play a critical role in promoting the immune escape of BM from EGFR-mutated NSCLC by increasing the apoptosis of CD8+ T lymphocytes. The increased secretion of interleukin 11(IL11) by astrocytes promotes the expression of PDL1 in BM, and this is responsible for the increased apoptosis of T lymphocytes. IL11 functions as a ligand of EGFR, and this binding activates EGFR and downstream signaling to increase the expression of PDL1, culminating in the immune escape of tumor cells. IL11 also promotes immune escape by binding to its intrinsic receptor (IL11Rα/glycoprotein 130 [gp130]). Additional in vivo studies show that the targeted inhibition of gp130 and EGFR suppresses the growth of BM and prolongs the survival time of mice. These results suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Multisequence MRI-based radiomics signature as potential biomarkers for differentiating KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

Background

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) has evolved from a genotype with predictive value to a therapeutic target recently. The study aimed to establish non-invasive radiomics models based on MRI to discriminate KRAS from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations in lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BM), then further explore the optimal sequence for prediction.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 317 patients (218 patients in training cohort and 99 patients in testing cohort) who had confirmed of KRAS, EGFR or ALK mutations. Radiomics features were separately extracted from T2WI, T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-CE) sequences. The maximal information coefficient and recursive feature elimination method were used to select informative features. Then we built four radiomics models for differentiating KRAS from EGFR or ALK using random forest classifier. ROC curves were used to validate the capability of the models.

Results

The four radiomics models for discriminating KRAS from EGFR all worked well, especially DWI and T2WI models (AUCs: 0.942, 0.942 in training cohort, 0.949, 0.954 in testing cohort). When KRAS compared to ALK, DWI and T2-FLAIR models showed excellent performance in two cohorts (AUCs: 0.947, 0.917 in training cohort, 0.850, 0.824 in testing cohort).

Conclusions

Radiomics classifiers integrating MRI have potential to discriminate KRAS from EGFR or ALK, which are helpful to guide treatment and facilitate the discovery of new approaches capable of achieving this long-sought goal of cure in lung cancer patients with KRAS.

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy as third- or further-line therapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 probably cannot tolerate chemotherapy or other antitumor therapies. Some studies have reported that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity. However, the efficacy of this combination as a later-line therapy in patients with ECOG PS 2 is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combination strategy as third- or further-line therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ECOG PS 2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients treated with camrelizumab plus antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab, anlotinib, or recombinant human endostatin) were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by ECOG PS, and safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 10, 2019, and February 28, 2024, a total of 59 patients were included. The ORR was 35.6% (21/59) and the DCR was 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range: 0.7-23.7), the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-7.3) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.6). QOL was improved (≥1 reduction in ECOG PS) in 39 patients (66.1%). The most common Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (6 [10%]), hypertension (5 [8%]), and hypothyroidism (3 [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Third- or further-line immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity in stage IV NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination therapy.

Discovery and Validation of Survival-Specific Genes in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Using a Customized Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panel

PURPOSE

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), the second most common kidney cancer, is morphologically, genetically, and molecularly heterogeneous with diverse clinical manifestations. Genetic variations of PRCC and their association with survival are not yet well-understood. This study aimed to identify and validate survival-specific genes in PRCC and explore their clinical utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using machine learning, 293 patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas-Kidney Renal Papillary Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-KIRP) database were analyzed to derive genes associated with survival. To validate these genes, DNAs were extracted from the tissues of 60 Korean PRCC patients. Next generation sequencing was conducted using a customized PRCC gene panel of 202 genes, including 171 survival-specific genes. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. Fisher's exact test was performed to assess the clinical utility of variant genes.

RESULTS

A total of 40 survival-specific genes were identified in the TCGA-KIRP database through machine learning and statistical analysis. Of them, 10 (BAP1, BRAF, CFDP1, EGFR, ITM2B, JAK1, NODAL, PCSK2, SPATA13, and SYT5) were validated in the Korean-KIRP database. Among these survival gene signatures, three genes (BAP1, PCSK2, and SPATA13) showed survival specificity in both overall survival (OS) (p = 0.00004, p = 1.38 × 10-7, and p = 0.026, respectively) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.00002, p = 1.21 × 10-7, and p = 0.036, respectively). Notably, the PCSK2 mutation demonstrated survival specificity uniquely in both the TCGA-KIRP (OS: p = 0.010 and DFS: p = 0.301) and Korean-KIRP (OS: p = 1.38 × 10-7 and DFS: p = 1.21 × 10-7) databases.

CONCLUSIONS

We discovered and verified genes specific for the survival of PRCC patients in the TCGA-KIRP and Korean-KIRP databases. The survival gene signature, including PCSK2 commonly obtained from the 40 gene signature of TCGA and the 10 gene signature of the Korean database, is expected to provide insight into predicting the survival of PRCC patients and developing new treatment.

The later-line efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment after EGFR-TKI resistance is of great clinical concern. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in later-line therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after TKI treatment failure and to explore the independent predictive factors of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients with confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after previous standard EGFR-TKI therapy but still failed after multiline treatments were included retrospectively in this study. Most of the patients had previously received at least three lines of treatment. All were treated with anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy. The safety of this combined treatment was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated by survival analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DCR).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 28.6 months (range: 2.3-54.0 months), and the median number of treatment lines was 4. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 19.7% and 77.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2-7.4 months), and the median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI 12.0-22.3 months). Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib had an encouraging intracranial ORR of 38.5% and a DCR of 80.8%. ECOG performance status < 2 at baseline was independent protective factors of PFS. Metastatic organs and ECOG performance status were independent parameters in predicting OS. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (93.0%) patients; most of the adverse events were Grade 1-2, and no increase in adverse events was observed compared to monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based regimen exhibited promising efficacy and tolerance in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations after previous TKI failure. The efficacy of this combined regimen in patients with EGFR mutations should be further evaluated.

Osimertinib plus local treatment for brain metastases versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is highly effective for brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unclear whether local treatment (LT) for BMs prior to osimertinib administration improves survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We aimed to reveal the survival benefit of upfront local treatment (LT) for BMs in patients treated with osimertinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with EGFR mutation (19del or L858R)-positive NSCLC who had BMs before osimertinib initiation between August 2018 and October 2021. We compared overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) between patients who received upfront LT for BMs (the upfront LT group), and patients who received osimertinib only (the osimertinib-alone group). Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients analyzed, 57 and 64 patients had 19del and L858R, respectively. Forty-five and 76 patients were included in the upfront LT group and the osimertinib-alone groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the OS of the upfront LT group was significantly longer than that of the osimertinib-alone group (median, 95 % confidence intervals [95 %CI]: Not reached [NR], NR-NR vs. 31.2, 21.7-33.2; p = 0.021). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and CNS-PFS was 0.37 (95 %CI, 0.16-0.87) and 0.36 (95 %CI, 0.15-0.87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS and CNS-PFS of patients who received upfront LT for BMs followed by osimertinib were significantly longer than those of patients who received osimertinib alone. Upfront LT for BMs may be beneficial in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Screening, Diagnosis, and Initial Care of Asian and White Patients With Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Data on the care of Asian patients with lung cancer in the US are limited; however, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in this population.

METHODS

Demographics, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, disease characteristics, and treatment history were compared between Asian and White patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer from 2014 to 2019 identified from Tufts Medical Center cancer registry. The influence of race on presenting stage was assessed via ordinal logistic regression. Time to treatment initiation (TTI) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via log-rank tests. The impact of race on OS was evaluated via multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Asian patients (N = 144) were more likely to prefer non-English languages, use interpreters, be never-smokers, and harbor EGFR alterations, compared to White patients (N = 472), and to be diagnosed with later-stage lung cancer (odds ratio: 2.14, P < .001), had longer median TTI (early stage: 2.30 vs. 1.43 months, P = .035; curative stage: 1.88 vs. 1.20 months, P = .041) and more often did not receive cancer-directed therapy (12.6% vs. 5.7%, P = .01). Screening LDCT was done only in 11.9% of Asian and 21.4% of White patients (P = .20) who would have met screening criteria prior to diagnosis (N = 215). Median OS was similar between Asian and White patients (not reached vs. 74.8 months, P = .17). Multivariable Cox model suggested better OS for Asian patients (hazard ratio: 0.57, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

In our study, Asian patients presented with later-stage lung cancer, had treatment delays, and more often did not receive treatment, compared to White patients, yet did not have inferior survival.

Prognostic implications of combining EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy in Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with 19-Del or 21-L858R mutations: A real-world study

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the potential benefits of combining radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for individuals with Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) harboring either exon 19 deletion (19-Del) or exon 21 L858R mutation (21-L858R).

METHODS

In this real-world retrospective study, 177 individuals with Stage IV LUAD who underwent EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy at Shandong Cancer Hospital from June 2012 to August 2017 were included. The main focus of this real-world study was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of patients with Stage IV LUAD harboring 19-Del were similar to those harboring 21-L858R (p > 0.05). Overall, the patients had a median OS (mOS) of 32.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.6-35.5). Subsequently, multivariate analysis indicated that both EGFR mutations and thoracic radiotherapy were independent predictors of OS (p = 0.001 and 0.013). Furthermore, subgroup analysis highlighted a longer OS for the 19-Del group compared to the 21-L858R group, especially when EGFR-TKIs were combined with bone metastasis or thoracic radiotherapy (mOS: 34.7 vs. 25.1 months and 51.0 vs. 29.6 months; p = 0.0056 and 0.0013, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in OS when considering patients who underwent brain metastasis radiotherapy (mOS: 34.7 vs. 25.1 months; p = 0.088).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Stage IV LUAD harboring 19-Del experience a notably prolonged OS following combined therapy with EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy, while this OS benefit is observed despite the absence of substantial differences in the clinical characteristics between the 19-Del and 21-L858R groups.

Intracranial Efficacy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Real-World Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR or ALK Alterations

Contrary to Pemetrexed-containing chemo-immunotherapy studies, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel (ABCP) treatment has consistently shown clinical benefit in prospective studies in patients with lung cancer and actionable mutations, where intracranial metastases are common. Here, we aimed to describe the real-life population of patients fit to receive ABCP after targeted therapy and quantify its clinical effect in patients with brain metastases. Patients treated in Cheshire and Merseyside between 2019 and 2022 were identified. Data were collected retrospectively. A total of 34 patients with actionable EGFR or ALK alterations had treatment with a median age of 59 years (range 32-77). The disease control rate was 100% in patients with PDL1 ≥ 1% (n = 10). In total, 19 patients (56%) had brain metastases before starting ABCP, 17 (50%) had untreated CNS disease, and 4 (22%) had PDL1 ≥ 1%. The median time to symptom improvement was 12.5 days (range 4-21 days), with 74% intracranial disease control rates and 89.5% synchronous intracranial (IC) and extracranial (EC) responses. IC median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) was 6.48 months, EC mPFS was 10.75 months, and median Overall Survival 11.47 months. ABCP in real-life patients with brain metastases (treated or untreated) was feasible and showed similar efficacy to that described in patients without actionable mutations treated with upfront chemo-immunotherapy.

EGFR mutation impacts recurrence in high-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma in the IASLC grading system

INTRODUCTION

The developments of perioperative treatments for patients with high-risk early-stage lung cancer are ongoing, however, real-world data and evidence of clinical significance of genetic aberration are lacking in this population. This study aimed to identify patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma at high risk for recurrence based on pathological indicators of poor prognosis, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grade, and elucidate the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) status.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 494 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2016. The patients were evaluated for EGFRm and IASLC grade. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pathological factors for poor prognosis associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with any one of these factors were classified into the high-risk group. The prognostic impact of EGFRm was evaluated using RFS, OS, and cumulative recurrence proportion.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis for RFS and OS revealed that IASLC grade 3, pathological invasion size>2 cm, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were indicators of poor prognosis. EGFRm-positive patients had a higher incidence of all types of recurrence, including central nervous system (CNS) metastasis and distant metastasis in high-risk group, but not in low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that patients with EGFRm-positive stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the high-risk group have an increased risk of recurrence, including CNS metastasis. These findings highlight the need for development of adjuvant treatment in this population.

Optimal sequence of LT for symptomatic BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a comparative study of first-line EGFR-TKIs with/without upfront LT

BACKGROUND

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can penetrate blood-brain barrier and are effective for brain metastases (BMs). There is no consensus on the optimal sequence of local therapy (LT) and EGFR-TKIs for symptomatic BM patients because patients suffering neurological symptoms were not enrolled in most clinical trials.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm) and symptomatic BM receiving first-line osimertinib and aumolertinib from two medical centers were collected. All participants were allocated into the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs) group and the upfront LT (uLT) plus third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs + uLT) group. Demographic data, survival outcomes, treatment failure patterns, and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of BM number on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

86 patients were enrolled, 44 in the TKIs group and 42 in the TKIs + uLT group. There were no significant differences in the short-term response between the groups. TKIs + uLT was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 28 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.77; p = .011). No differences in progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), failure patterns, or safety were observed. In subgroup analyses of oligo-BM patients, TKIs + uLT could prolong OS (43 vs. 31 months; HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.92; p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFRm NSCLC patients with symptomatic BM might benefit from uLT, particularly oligo-BM patients. However, larger prospective cohort studies should be carried out to confirm the responses of the TKIs + uLT scheme.

Exploring the Molecular Tumor Microenvironment and Translational Biomarkers in Brain Metastases of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Brain metastases represent a significant clinical challenge in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), often leading to a severe decline in patient prognosis and survival. Recent advances in imaging and systemic treatments have increased the detection rates of brain metastases, yet clinical outcomes remain dismal due to the complexity of the metastatic tumor microenvironment (TME) and the lack of specific biomarkers for early detection and targeted therapy. The intricate interplay between NSCLC tumor cells and the surrounding TME in brain metastases is pivotal, influencing tumor progression, immune evasion, and response to therapy. This underscores the necessity for a deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of brain metastases, tumor microenvironment, and the identification of actionable biomarkers that can inform multimodal treatment approaches. The goal of this review is to synthesize current insights into the TME and elucidate molecular mechanisms in NSCLC brain metastases. Furthermore, we will explore the promising horizon of emerging biomarkers, both tissue- and liquid-based, that hold the potential to radically transform the treatment strategies and the enhancement of patient outcomes.

Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Prevalence of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: Treatment implications for resource-constrained settings

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are common in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, routine neuroimaging in asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC is controversial as there is no conclusive evidence of benefit from the detection and treatment of asymptomatic BM. Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic BM and its treatment implications in a resource-limited setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) were included. Subjects who already had clinical or radiological features suggestive of BM were excluded from the study. All eligible subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Management of the detected BM was at the discretion of the treating clinicians.

RESULTS

Among 809 subjects who were screened, 100 (12.4%) were included in the study and underwent MRI. BM was present in 30 (30%) of the subjects and absent in the remaining 70 subjects. A majority of BM were multiple (70%), involved the frontal lobe commonly (73.3%), and had a mean (standard deviation) size of 13.2 (7.3) mm. Detection of BM resulted in a treatment alteration in 17 (17%) of the study subjects (brain irradiation, n = 17, change in targeted therapy, n = 3) with BM. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent treatment alteration for management of BM compared to those who did not (P = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-third of patients with metastatic NS-NSCLC had BM in MRI despite the absence of symptoms. Despite treatment of the majority of the patients with BM with brain irradiation, there was no demonstrable survival benefit. Hence, we conclude that although routine neuroimaging of asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC may result in treatment alteration (primarily brain irradiation) in a small proportion of patients, it may not influence outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Machine-Learning-Aided Prediction of Brain Metastases Development in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers

PURPOSE

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows a high incidence of brain metastases (BM). Early detection is crucial to improve clinical prospects. We trained and validated classifier models to identify patients with a high risk of developing BM, as they could potentially benefit from surveillance brain MRI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of NSCLC from January 2011 to April 2019 and an in-house chest-CT scan (staging) were retrospectively recruited at a German lung cancer center. Brain imaging was performed at initial diagnosis and in case of neurological symptoms (follow-up). Subjects lost to follow-up or still alive without BM at the data cut-off point (12/2020) were excluded. Covariates included clinical and/or 3D-radiomics-features of the primary tumor from staging chest-CT. Four machine learning models for prediction (80/20 training) were compared. Gini Importance and SHAP were used as measures of importance; sensitivity, specificity, area under the precision-recall curve, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient as evaluation metrics.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-five patients compromised the clinical cohort. Predictive models based on clinical features offered the best performance (tuned to maximize recall: sensitivity∼70%, specificity∼60%). Radiomics features failed to provide sufficient information, likely due to the heterogeneity of imaging data. Adenocarcinoma histology, lymph node invasion, and histological tumor grade were positively correlated with the prediction of BM, age, and squamous cell carcinoma histology were negatively correlated. A subgroup discovery analysis identified 2 candidate patient subpopulations appearing to present a higher risk of BM (female patients + adenocarcinoma histology, adenocarcinoma patients + no other distant metastases).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the importance of input features suggests that the models are learning the relevant relationships between clinical features/development of BM. A higher number of samples is to be prioritized to improve performance. Employed prospectively at initial diagnosis, such models can help select high-risk subgroups for surveillance brain MRI.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and brain metastasis

The presence of brain metastases (BM) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their incidence seems to be higher in patients with oncogene-driven tumours, especially those with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged tumours. Although targeted treatments demonstrate significant efficacy regarding BM, they only apply to a minority of NSCLC patients. On the other hand, systemic therapies for nononcogenic-driven NSCLC with BM have shown limited clinical benefit. In recent years, immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has been adopted as a new standard of care in first-line therapy. This approach seems to be beneficial to patients with BM in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Combined immune checkpoint inhibition as well as the combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy show promising results with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. A pragmatic approach of allowing enrolment of patients with untreated or symptomatic BM in randomised trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors strategies, possibly coupled with central nervous system-related endpoints may be needed to generate data to refine treatment for this patient population.

Effects of cilengitide derivatives on TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and invasion in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells

Long-term administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) induces TKI resistance in cells. The appearance of resistant cells requires the combined administration of another therapeutic agent and may cause side effects in the gastrointestinal and central nervous system. In previous studies, we found that derivatives of cilengitide, a cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide, exert NSCLC apoptotic and anti-epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) effects. In particular, cRGDwV and cRGDyV, which are cyclic peptides containing aromatic amino acids, were found to inhibit NSCLC cell growth, TGF-β1-induced EMT, and invasion. In this study, we confirmed the effects of cRGDwV and cRGDyV on proliferation, TGF-β1-induced EMT marker expression, migration, and invasion in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC A549 (A549GR) cells. In A549GR cells, cRGDwV and cRGDyV showed inhibitory effects on the expression of mesenchymal marker expression, migration, and invasion. These results indicate that cyclic RGD peptides containing aromatic amino acids can be used to inhibit mesenchymal marker expression as well as migration and invasion in gefitinib-resistant cells.

Afatinib overcoming resistance to icotinib and osimertinib in NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with acquired EGFR L858R/T790M or L858R/S768I mutations: Two case reports

Background

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often complicated by leptomeningeal metastases (LMs), especially in patients carrying EGFR mutations. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line drug for patients with specific gene mutations, such as EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation. However, after long-term TKI use, patients eventually develop drug resistance and acquire new mutations. Acquiring the EGFR T790 M mutation during TKI treatment is a marker for first/second generation TKI resistance. Osimertinib (a third-generation TKI) could overcome this resistance, especially for patients who have already developed NSCLC-LM. Treating NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance is challenging. Our aim was to investigate whether afatinib is effective in NSCLC-LM patient who showed resistance to osimertinib. Herein, we report two patients with resistance to first- and third-generation TKIs who benefited from second-generation TKI.

Case summary

Case one: A 43-year-old man was diagnosed with stage 3A NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion. He underwent surgery and received 4 rounds of chemotherapy (oxaliplatin combined with liposomal paclitaxel), after which the disease was controlled by icotinib (a first-generation TKI) for 4 years. Then, he showed poor drug response and bone metastasis. A liquid biopsy was carried out, and the EGFR L858R/T790 M compound mutation was found. The patient was given osimertinib (a third-generation TKI). The patient was in a stable condition for 2 years and then he developed bilateral peripheral facial palsy. Brain MRI showed enhancement in the left temporal lobe and meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology detected tumour cells in the CSF. NSCLC-LM was diagnosed. His performance status (PS) score was 3-4. Liquid biopsy and next-generation sequencing were performed again. Different gene mutations and copy number alterations were found this time, including EGFR L858R, but without the EGFR T790 M mutation. His disease was controlled with intrathecal methotrexate and oral afatinib (a second generation TKI). The patient has shown clinical remission (PS score: 1-2) until now, which is longer than 10 months.

Case two

A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with NSCLC in May 2020. He underwent one round of chemotherapy before thoracoscopic partial lobectomy of the right upper lung. Histological study of the lung tissue showed lung adenocarcinoma with the EGFR L858R mutation. Then, the disease was controlled with icotinib. One year later, he was diagnosed with NSCLC-LM. Liquid biopsy and sequencing showed an EGFR L858R/S768I compound mutation. The patient was treated with osimertinib. His condition was stable for 5 months before his central nervous system (CNS) symptoms were exacerbated. Liquid biopsy and sequencing were carried out again, and his gene mutation profile had not changed much. Then, the patient was given afatinib, and his condition has remained stable for 11 months.

Conclusion

Afatinib might be suitable for NSCLC-LM patients with EGFR compound mutations who show resistance to icotinib and osimertinib, since it might help overcome first- and third-generation TKI resistance.

Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.

Anlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with multiple brain metastases that progressed or developed after at least one lines of prior treatment

Background

Intracranial metastasis that failed standard systematic treatment is common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for NSCLC with brain metastases (BMs) that progressed or developed after at least one line of prior treatment and compare the outcomes with that of the contemporary institutional control.

Methods

NSCLC patients with multiple BMs that progressed or developed after at least one line of prior systematic treatment and treated with WBRT subsequently between 2019 and 2021 were selected retrospectively for analysis. Based on whether concurrent anlotinib had been used in combination with WBRT, the cases were divided into the anlotinib group and control group. The primary endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and safety.

Results

A total of 76 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. Of the 76 patients, 34 received concurrent WBRT and anlotinib followed by anlotinib maintenance and 42 were treated with WBRT alone or in combination with other systemic agents at the physicians' discretion. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 21 months. The median iPFS for the anlotinib and control group was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.9) and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.5), respectively (log-rank P = 0.04). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.38). In the anlotinib group, treatment-related adverse events were reported in 15 patients (44.1%), with acute or late grade 3-5 adverse events identified in 14.7% of patients (n = 5).

Conclusions

WBRT plus anlotinib, as a convenient chemo-free regimen, may represent an overall safe and effective procedure in advanced NSCLC with multiple BMs that progressed or developed after standard systematic treatment.

Effect of Different Timing of Local Brain Radiotherapy on Survival of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Patients with Limited Brain Metastases

(1) Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been the first line therapy for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the role and the optimal time of brain radiotherapy remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the role of upfront brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) and the impact of deferral radiotherapy on patients' clinical outcomes. (2) Methods: We retrospectively studied 53 EGFR-mutant LAC patients with limited synchronous BMs between 2014 and 2020 at our institute. The limited BMs was defined with one to four BM lesions, with a maximal size of ≤4 cm. Patients were categorized into two groups: upfront brain SRS (upfront RT) and upfront TKIs. The intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between groups were analyzed. (3) Results: The median iPFS (21.0 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.002) and PFS (20.0 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.004) of the upfront RT group was longer than that of the upfront TKI group. There were no significant differences in median OS (30.0 vs. 26.0 months, p = 0.552) between the two groups. The upfront RT group is less likely to suffer from intracranial progression of the original sites than that of upfront TKIs during the disease course (36.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that the Karnofsky Performance Scale and the presence of synchronous meningeal metastases were associated with overall survival. (4) Conclusions: Compared with upfront TKI, the combination of upfront SRS with TKIs can improve the iPFS and PFS in EGFR-mutant LAC with synchronous BMs. The addition of upfront brain SRS was useful for the original intracranial metastatic lesions.

Improved survival and intracranial tumor control of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with newly developed brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery and EGFR-TKI: a large retrospective cohort study and meta-analyses

PURPOSE

To examine the differential effects of SRS and TKI on EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BMs) and outcomes following continuation of the same TKI agent in case of new BMs.

METHODS

This study included 608 NSCLC patients (2,274 BMs) while meta-analyses included 1,651 NSCLC patients (> 3,944 BMs). Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios (95% CI) of prognostic factors were estimated using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The median OS/iPFS (95% CI) (months) for patients with wildtype EGFR/ALK, EGFR mutations, and ALK rearrangements were 17.7 (12.9-23.6)/12.1 (9.8-15.6), 28.9 (23.8-33.3)/17.7 (14.8-21.2), and 118.0 (not reached)/71.7 (15.1-not reached), respectively. In EGFR-mutated patients, meta-analyses combining our data showed significantly improved OS and iPFS of patients who received SRS and TKI (OS:35.1 months, iPFS:20.0 months) when compared to those who have SRS alone (OS:20.8 months, iPFS:11.8 months) or TKI alone (OS:24.3 months, iPFS:13.8 months). Having SRS for newly diagnosed BMs while keeping the existing TKI agent yielded OS (30.0 vs. 32.1 months, p = 0.200) non-inferior to patients who started combined SRS and TKI therapy for their newly diagnosed NSCLC with BMs. Multivariable analyses showed that good performance score and TKI therapy were associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined SRS and TKI resulted in favorable outcomes in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with newly diagnosed BMs. Continuation of the same TKI agent plus SRS in case of new brain metastases yielded good clinical outcomes and may be considered a standard-of-care treatment.

Osimertinib early dose reduction as a risk to brain metastasis control in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a risk factor associated with brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction on BM worsening.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib as first-line treatment between August 2018 and October 2021. To evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction, we performed a landmark analysis of patients who achieved disease control at 4 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the osimertinib dose was reduced or not, within 4 months after the start of treatment. We evaluated the time to BMs onset or progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 62 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were analyzed. Thirteen patients experienced early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment. Seven patients received osimertinib 40 mg daily, and six received 80 mg every other day. The most common reason for dose reduction was gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 4), followed by skin rashes (n = 3). The time to BMs onset or progression was significantly shorter in patients who experienced early dose reduction than in those who continued regular treatment (Hazard ratio 4.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.52-13.11). The 1-year cumulative incidence of BM onset or progression was 23.1% in the reduced-dose group and 5.0% in the standard dose group. The risk of worsening BMs with early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment was higher in patients who had BMs before treatment and in younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Early dose reduction of osimertinib was a risk factor for the worsening of BMs. A higher risk was associated with younger patients and those presenting BMs before treatment.

Role of radiation in oligometastases and oligoprogression in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: consensus and controversy

INTRODUCTION

The oligometastatic state in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently become well-established. However, the specific definition of oligometastases remains unclear. Several smaller randomized studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of radiation as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic NSCLC, which have led the way to larger studies currently accruing patients globally.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the definitions of 'oligometastases' and explains why the oligometastatic state is becoming increasingly relevant in metastatic NSCLC. This includes the rationale for MDT in oligometastatic NSCLC, specifically reviewing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a treatment strategy. This review details many randomized trials that support radiation as MDT and introduces trials that are currently accruing patients. Finally, it explores some of the controversies that warrant further investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

Radiation treatment, specifically SBRT, has been shown to be safe, convenient, and cost-effective as MDT. As systemic therapy, including targeted agents and immunotherapy, continues to improve, the precise role(s) and timing of radiation therapy may evolve. However, radiation therapy as MDT will continue to be an integral part of treatment in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

Intracranial Efficacy of Systemic Therapy in Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer

There has been controversy over whether to radiologically follow up or use local treatment for asymptomatic small-sized brain metastases from primary lung cancer. For brain tumors without local treatment, we evaluated potential factors related to the brain progression and whether systemic therapy controlled the tumor. We analyzed 96 patients with asymptomatic small-sized metastatic brain tumors from lung cancer. These underwent a radiologic follow-up every 2 or 3 months without local treatment of brain metastases. The pathologies of the tumors were adenocarcinoma (n = 74), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 11), and small cell carcinoma (n = 11). The primary lung cancer was treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (n = 57) and targeted therapy (n = 39). Patients who received targeted therapy were divided into first generation (n = 23) and second or third generation (n = 16). The progression-free survival (PFS) of brain metastases and the overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed depending on the age, tumor pathology, number, and location of brain metastases, the extent of other organ metastases, and chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS of brain metastases was 7.4 months (range, 1.1-48.3). Targeted therapy showed statistically significant PFS improvement compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy (p = 0.020). Especially, on univariate and multivariate analyses, the PFS in the second or third generation targeted therapy was more significantly improved compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.229; 95% confidence interval, 0.082-0.640; p = 0.005). The median OS of patients was 13.7 months (range, 2.0-65.0). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the OS of patients was related to other organ metastases except for the brain (p = 0.010 and 0.020, respectively). Three out of 52 patients with brain recurrence showed leptomeningeal dissemination, while the recurrence patterns of brain metastases were mostly local and/or distant metastases (94.2%). Of the 52 patients who relapsed, 25 patients received local brain treatment. There was brain-related mortality in two patients (2.0%). The intracranial anti-tumor effect was superior to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of asymptomatic small-sized brain metastases with targeted therapy. Consequently, it becomes possible to determine the optimal timing for local brain treatment while conducting radiological follow-up for these tumors, which do not appear to increase brain-related mortality. Furthermore, this approach has the potential to reduce the number of cases requiring brain local treatment.

18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics predicts brain metastasis in I-IIIA resected Non-Small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To establish ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics model for predicting brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

This research comprised 203 NSCLC patients who had received surgical therapy at two institutions. To identify independent predictive factors of brain metastasis, metabolic indicators, CT features, and clinical features were investigated. A prediction model was established by incorporating radiomics signature and clinicopathological risk variables. The suggested model's performance was assessed from the perspective of discrimination, calibration, and clinical application.

RESULTS

The C-indices of the PET/CT radiomics model in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts were 0.911, 0.825 and 0.800, respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and air bronchogram were independent risk factors for brain metastasis (BM). Furthermore, the combined model integrating radiomics and clinicopathological characteristics related to brain metastasis performed better in terms of prediction, with C-indices of 0.927, 0.861, and 0.860 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested that the PET/CT nomogram was clinically beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive algorithm based on PET/CT imaging information and clinicopathological features may accurately predict the probability of brain metastasis in NSCLC patients following surgery. This presented doctors with a unique technique for screening NSCLC patients at high risk of brain metastasis.

Randomized Trial of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor With or Without Radiotherapy for Synchronous Oligometastatic EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adding radiotherapy (RT) to systemic therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether these findings translate to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC remains unknown. The SINDAS trial (NCT02893332) evaluated first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for EGFR-mutated synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC and randomized to upfront RT vs no RT; we now report the prespecified interim analysis at 68% accrual.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma (per amplification refractory mutation system or next generation sequencing), with synchronous (newly diagnosed, treatment naïve) oligometastatic (≤5 metastases; ≤2 lesions in any one organ) NSCLC without brain metastases. All patients received a first-generation TKI (gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), and randomization was between no RT vs RT (25-40 Gy in 5 fractions depending on tumor size and location) to all metastases and the primary tumor/involved regional lymphatics. The primary endpoint (intention to treat) was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS and toxicities. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (n = 65 TKI only, n = 68 TKI with RT) were enrolled (2016-2019). The median follow-up was 23.6 months. The respective median PFS was 12.5 months vs 20.2 months (P < .001), and the median OS was 17.4 months vs 25.5 months (P < .001) for TKI only vs TKI with RT. Treatment yielded no grade 5 events and a 6% rate of symptomatic grade 3-4 pneumonitis in the TKI with RT arm. Based on the efficacy results of this prespecified interim analysis, the ethics committee recommended premature cessation of this trial.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with a first-line TKI alone, addition of upfront local therapy using RT statistically significantly improved PFS and OS for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Rationale and value of consolidative cranial local therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with baseline brain metastasis treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs

Objectives

To explore the rationale and value of consolidative cranial local therapy (CLT) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs).

Methods

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with baseline BMs who received first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at two academic centers from May 2015 to June 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Patterns of tumor response and treatment failure were extensively analyzed in order to explore the rationale of CLT. Cranial lesions with number ⩽3 and largest tumor size ⩽3 cm at baseline and best response to EGFR-TKIs were defined as oligo-BMs and oligo-residual cranial disease (ORCD), respectively. To provide preliminary data supporting CLT, survival outcomes were compared in patients with ORCD, stratified by CLT status.

Results

Of the 216 patients enrolled, 57.1% had oligo-BMs and 24.5% received first-line osimertinib. At best response to the first-line EGFR-TKIs, intracranial complete response, partial response, and stable disease occurred in 18.5, 31.9, and 44.4% of the whole population, respectively. For patients without CLT (n = 193), ORCD was observed in 78.1% of the 105 patients with baseline oligo-BMs and 10.2% of the 88 patients with baseline multiple-BMs. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, 107 patients had cranial first progressive disease (PD); more than 60% developed their first PD solely from the residual tumor sites at best response to EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, among patients with ORCD (n = 108), patients who received CLT (n = 17) achieved significantly longer progression-free survival (13.4 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.001) and overall survival (58.9 versus 28.8 months, p = 0.021) than those without CLT. Meanwhile, CLT remained as an independent prognostic factor associated with improved survival after Cox regression analyses.

Conclusions

Cranial progressive disease developed mostly at the residual cranial lesions in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with baseline BMs who received first-line EGFR-TKIs. Consolidative cranial local therapy targeting the oligo-residual cranial tumor lesions may provide survival benefit, which warrants future validation.

Brain Metastasis Incidence and Patterns of Presentation After Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Potential Argument for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance

Purpose

Brain metastases (BMs) are a common source of morbidity and mortality. Guidelines do not advise brain surveillance for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We describe the incidence, time to development, presentation, and management of BMs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods and Materials

We reviewed records of patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT within the period from 2013 to 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to BM. Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Results

A total of 219 patients were reviewed including 96 with squamous cell carcinoma, 88 with adenocarcinoma, and 35 with large cell/not otherwise specified (LC/NOS). Thirty-nine patients (17.8%) developed BMs: 35 (90%) symptomatic and 4 (10%) asymptomatic. The rate of BM was highest in LC/NOS (34.3%) and adenocarcinoma (23.9%). Ninety percent of BMs occurred within 2 years. All asymptomatic patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery alone, compared with 40% of symptomatic patients (P = .04). Symptomatic patients were more likely to require hospitalization (65.7% vs 0%, P = .02), craniotomy (25.7% vs 0%, not significant), and steroids (91.4% vs 0%, P < .001). Cumulative BM volume was higher for symptomatic patients (4 vs 0.24 cm³, P < .001) as was median greatest axial dimension (2.18 vs 0.52 cm, P < .001).

Conclusions

We identified a high rate of BMs, particularly in LC/NOS and adenocarcinoma histology NSCLC. The majority were symptomatic. These results provide rationale for post-CRT magnetic resonance imaging brain surveillance for patients at high risk of BM.

Recurrence Patterns and Patient Outcomes in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma Differ according to Ground-Glass Opacity at CT

Background Although lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO) is known to have distinct characteristics, limited data exist on whether the recurrence pattern and outcomes in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma differ according to GGO presence at CT. Purpose To examine recurrence patterns and associations with outcomes in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma according to GGO at CT. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent CT followed by lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung adenocarcinoma between July 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of GGO: GGO adenocarcinoma and solid adenocarcinoma. Recurrence patterns at follow-up CT examinations were investigated and compared between the two groups. The effects of patient grouping on time to recurrence, postrecurrence survival (PRS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression. Results Of 1019 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 9 [SD]; 520 women), 487 had GGO adenocarcinoma and 532 had solid adenocarcinoma. Recurrences occurred more frequently in patients with solid adenocarcinoma (36.1% [192 of 532 patients]) than in those with GGO adenocarcinoma (16.2% [79 of 487 patients]). Distant metastasis was the most common mode of recurrence in the group with solid adenocarcinoma and all clinical stages. In clinical stage I GGO adenocarcinoma, all regional recurrences appeared as ipsilateral lung metastasis (39.2% [20 of 51]) without regional lymph node metastasis. Brain metastasis was more frequent in patients with clinical stage I solid adenocarcinoma (16.5% [16 of 97 patients]). The presence of GGO was associated with time to recurrence and OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [P < .001] for both). Recurrence pattern was an independent risk factor for PRS (adjusted HR, 2.1 for distant metastasis [P < .001] and 3.9 for brain metastasis [P < .001], with local-regional recurrence as the reference). Conclusion Recurrence patterns, time to recurrence, and overall survival differed between patients with and without ground-glass opacity at CT, and recurrence patterns were associated with postrecurrence survival. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Structure-Activity Relationship Studies Based on Quinazoline Derivatives as EGFR Kinase Inhibitors (2017-Present)

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a critical role in the tumorigenesis of various forms of cancer. Targeting the mutant forms of EGFR has been identified as an attractive therapeutic approach and led to the approval of three generations of inhibitors. The quinazoline core has emerged as a favorable scaffold for the development of novel EGFR inhibitors due to increased affinity for the active site of EGFR kinase. Currently, there are five first-generation (gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, vandetanib, and icotinib) and two second-generation (afatinib and dacomitinib) quinazoline-based EGFR inhibitors approved for the treatment of various types of cancers. The aim of this review is to outline the structural modulations favorable for the inhibitory activity toward both common mutant (del19 and L858R) and resistance-conferring mutant (T790M and C797S) EGFR forms, and provide an overview of the newly synthesized quinazoline derivatives as potentially competitive, covalent or allosteric inhibitors of EGFR.

Fructose utilization enhanced by GLUT5 promotes lung cancer cell migration via activating glycolysis/AKT pathway

PURPOSE

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortalities worldwide, and metastasis contributes to a large number of deaths in lung carcinoma patients. New approaches for anti-metastatic treatment are urgently needed. Enhanced fructose metabolism mediated by GLUT5 directly contributes to cancer metastasis. However, the underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated, which we aimed to explore in this study.

METHODS

The overexpression and knockdown of SLC2A5, the encoding gene of GLUT5, were established by retrovirus system and CRISPR/Cas9 technology, respectively. Cell migration was conducted by trans-well assay. Western blotting assay was carried out to detect the expression of GLUT5, total AKT, phosphorylated AKT (pAKT-S473 and pAKT-T308) and LDHA. Lactate production was measured by colorimetric assay. Experimental lung metastasis model by tail vein injection was constructed to evaluate the metastatic potential of GLUT5 in vivo.

RESULTS

Overexpression of SLC2A5 promoted migration of lung cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, and shortened the overall survival of mice. While, SLC2A5 deletion blocked the migration of lung cancer cells. GLUT5-mediated fructose utilization upregulated phosphorylated AKT, which was responsible for enhanced migration of lung cancer cells. Additionally, GLUT5-mediated fructose utilization boosted glycolysis with overproduction of lactate, resulting in upregulation of phosphorylated AKT. Moreover, lung cancer cell migration and AKT activation were restrained by glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) or GLUT5-specific inhibitor 2,5-anhydro-D-mannitol (2,5-AM).

CONCLUSION

Our study unveils glycolysis/lactate/AKT pathway is responsible for lung cancer cell migration induced by GLUT5-mediated fructose metabolism, providing a potential therapeutic avenue for lung cancer metastasis.

Sec61γ is a vital protein in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane promoting tumor metastasis and invasion in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Finding effective prognostic markers and therapeutic targets is of great significance for controlling metastasis and invasion clinically.

METHODS

The open copy-number aberrations and gene expression datasets were analysed, and the data of 102 LUAD patients was used for further validation. The cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion assays and mice tumor models were used to detect the function of SEC61G. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway was also detected to find the mechanism of Sec61γ.

RESULTS

Based on the open datasets, we found that the high level of SEC61G mRNA may drive LUAD metastasis. Furthermore, the overexpression of Sec61γ protein was significantly associated with poor prognosis and greater tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. The SEC61G knockdown could inhibit the EGFR pathway, including STAT3, AKT and PI3K, which can be reversed by Sec61γ overexpression and epithelial growth factor (EGF) supplement.

CONCLUSIONS

Sec61γ promoted the proliferation, metastasis, and invasion of LUAD through EGFR pathways. Sec61γ might be a potential target for the treatment of LUAD metastases.

Treatment Patterns, Testing Practices, and Outcomes in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Poland: A Descriptive Analysis of National, Multicenter, Real-World Data from the REFLECT Study

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of new cases of lung cancer. Over the past two decades, treatment of patients with NSCLC has evolved from the empiric use of chemotherapy to more advanced targeted therapy dedicated to patients with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The multinational REFLECT study analyzed treatment patterns, outcomes, and testing practices among patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy across Europe and Israel. The aim of this study is to describe the Polish population of patients from the REFLECT study, focusing on treatment patterns and T790M mutation testing practice. A descriptive, retrospective, non-interventional, medical record-based analysis was performed on the Polish population of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations from the REFLECT study (NCT04031898). A medical chart review with data collection was conducted from May to December 2019.The study involved 110 patients. Afatinib was used as the first-line EGFR-TKI therapy in 45 (40.9%) patients, erlotinib in 41 (37.3%), and gefitinib in 24 (21.8%) patients. The first-line EGFR-TKI therapy was discontinued in 90 (81.8%) patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line EGFR-TKI therapy was 12.9 months (95% CI 10.3-15.4). A total of 54 patients started second-line therapy, of whom osimertinib was administered to 31 (57.4%). Among 85 patients progressing on first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, 58 (68.2%) were tested for the T790M mutation. Positive results for the T790M mutation were obtained from 31 (53.4%) tested patients, all of whom received osimertinib in the next lines of therapy. The median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy was 26.2 months (95% CI 18.0-29.7). Among patients with brain metastases, the median OS from the first diagnosis of brain metastases was 15.5 months (95% CI 9.9-18.0). The results of the Polish population from the REFLECT study highlight the need for effective treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Nearly one-third of patients with disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy were not tested for the T790M mutation and did not have the opportunity to receive effective treatment. The presence of brain metastases was a negative prognostic factor.

Imaging of brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: indications, protocols, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding management

Increased survival (due to the use of targeted therapies based on genomic profiling) has resulted in the increased incidence of brain metastasis during the course of disease, and thus, made it essential to have proper imaging guidelines in place for brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brain parenchymal metastases can have varied imaging appearances, and it is pertinent to be aware of the various molecular risk factors for brain metastasis from NSCLC along with their suggestive imaging appearances, so as to identify them early. Leptomeningeal metastasis requires additional imaging of the spine and an early cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Differentiation of post-therapy change from recurrence on imaging has a bearing on the management, hence the need for its awareness. This article will provide in-depth literature review of the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, screening, detection, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding the management of brain metastasis from NSCLC. In addition, we will also briefly highlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in brain metastasis screening.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

IMPORTANCE

Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the standard therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of these agents in patients with brain metastases remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with platinum) compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers in China from January 13, 2016, to August 27, 2021. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (IQR, 13.5-31.8 months). Patients with untreated confirmed brain metastases and EGFR-sensitive mutated NSCLC were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib plus chemotherapy or gefitinib alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was intracranial PFS; secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate, overall objective response rate, and safety. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients (87 [54.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 55 [9.8] years; range, 26-80 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive gefitinib (n = 81) or gefitinib plus chemotherapy (n = 80). The median intracranial PFS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.9 months) in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs 9.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-10.2 months) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53; P < .001). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib plus chemotherapy than gefitinib alone (16.3; 95% CI, 14.4-18.2 months vs 9.5; 95% CI, 8.3-10.8 months; P < .001). Gefitinib plus chemotherapy had a better intracranial objective response rate (85.0%; 95% CI, 77.0%-93.0% vs 63.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-73.7%; P = .002) and overall objective response rate (80.0%; 95% CI, 71.0%-89.0% vs 64.2%; 95% CI, 53.5%-74.9%; P = .03) than gefitinib alone. At data cutoff, the median OS was also significantly longer in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs the gefitinib group (35.0 vs 28.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99; P = .04). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common with gefitinib plus chemotherapy, most of which were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved intracranial PFS, PFS, and OS compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases and could be an optional first-line treatment for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01951469.

Proteomic analysis of brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma reveals intertumoral heterogeneity and specific alterations associated with the timing of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are associated with considerable negative effects on patients' outcome in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Here, we investigated the proteomic landscape of primary LADCs and their corresponding brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Proteomic profiling was conducted on 20 surgically resected primary and brain metastatic LADC samples via label-free shotgun proteomics. After sample processing, peptides were analyzed using an Ultimate 3000 pump coupled to a QExactive HF-X mass spectrometer. Raw data were searched using PD 2.4. Further data analyses were carried out using Perseus, RStudio and GraphPad Prism. Proteomic data were correlated with clinical and histopathological parameters and the timing of brain metastases. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027259.

RESULTS

Out of the 6821 proteins identified and quantified, 1496 proteins were differentially expressed between primary LADCs and corresponding brain metastases. Pathways associated with the immune system, cell-cell/matrix interactions and migration were predominantly activated in the primary tumors, whereas pathways related to metabolism, translation or vesicle formation were overrepresented in the metastatic tumors. When comparing fast- versus slow-progressing patients, we found 454 and 298 differentially expressed proteins in the primary tumors and brain metastases, respectively. Metabolic reprogramming and ribosomal activity were prominently up-regulated in the fast-progressing patients (versus slow-progressing individuals), whereas expression of cell-cell interaction- and immune system-related pathways was reduced in these patients and in those with multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive proteomic analysis of paired primary tumors and brain metastases of LADC patients. Our data suggest a malfunction of cellular attachment and an increase in ribosomal activity in LADC tissue, promoting brain metastasis. The current study provides insights into the biology of LADC brain metastases and, moreover, might contribute to the development of personalized follow-up strategies in LADC.

Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the presence of brain metastases has historically portended poor prognosis, recent advances in local and systemic therapies have greatly improved outcomes for NSCLC patients with CNS involvement. Stereotactic radiology surgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective radiotherapy technique with fewer toxicities compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Furthermore, multi-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with CNS overall response rates (ORR) of up to 70-80% are now an accepted first-line approach for a subset of advanced NSCLC patients with targetable molecular alterations. In addition, while the CNS was once considered an immunologic sanctuary site, growing evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in brain metastases as well. Ongoing efforts to optimize CNS metastases management are necessary to refine multimodal treatment approaches and develop new therapeutics with better CNS penetrance.

Recurrence patterns and progression-free survival after chemoradiotherapy with or without consolidation durvalumab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation durvalumab (CCRT+D) improves survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared recurrence patterns and survival in the CCRT+D and CCRT cohorts. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study in Japan. Patients who received CCRT for stage III NSCLC were included in this study. Of 178 eligible patients, 136 were in the CCRT+D and 42 were in the CCRT cohorts. Locoregional recurrence (LR), LR plus distant metastases (DM), and DM were observed in 20.6%, 8.8%, 27.9% of the CCRT+D, and 26.2%, 16.7% and 33.3% of the CCRT cohorts, respectively. In-field recurrence was the most common LR pattern in both cohorts. Squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 expression < 1%, and female sex and EGFR mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of LR and DM. In patients with any risk factors for LR, the incidence of LR was similar in the CCRT+D and CCRT (39.5% vs 45.5%). The 24 month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40.3% and 69.4% in the CCRT+D and 24.7% and 61.0% in the CCRT cohorts, respectively. Poor performance status and no consolidation durvalumab were significantly associated with shorter PFS. There was a significant difference in PFS between the CCRT+D and CCRT in the propensity score-matched cohort (HR = 0.51, P = 0.005). In conclusion, consolidation durvalumab decreased both LR and DM, and significantly improved PFS. However, in-field recurrence was still a major problem, as well as DM.

Real-world risk of brain metastases in stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the era of PET and MRI staging

Objective

The 2-year incidence of brain metastases (BrMs) in stage III non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) has been estimated to be around 30%. However, recent clinical trials have demonstrated considerably lower BrMs rates in this patient population. In this study, we aimed to review the real-world incidence, surveillance, and treatment patterns of BrMs in stage III NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Using a retrospective single-center study design, we identified patients with stage III NSCLC who received radiation with curative intent over a 10-year period. Outcome variables included BrMs incidence, overall survival (OS), and survival from date of BrMs. Additionally, we assessed patterns of BrMs surveillance in stage III NSCLC and treatment.

Results

We identified a total of 279 stage III NSCLC patients, of which 160 with adequate records were included in the final analyses [adenocarcinoma (n = 96), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 53), other histology subtype (n = 11)]. The median OS for the entire cohort was 41 months (95% CI, 28-53), while the median time from BrMs to death was 19 months (95% CI, 9-21). Twenty-three patients (14.4%) received planned surveillance brain MRIs at 6, 12, and 24 months after completion of treatment. The remaining 137 patients (85.6%) received brain MRIs at systemic recurrence (restaging) or when neurologically symptomatic. A total of 37 patients (23%) developed BrMs, with a 2-year cumulative BrMs incidence of 17% (95% CI, 11-23). A higher incidence of BrMs was identified in patients with adenocarcinoma relative to those with squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.01). Similarly, a higher 2-year BrMs incidence was observed in patients who received planned surveillance brain MRI relative to those who did not, although statistical significance was not reached. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treated 29 of BrMs patients (78.4%) and was preferred over WBRT, which treated only 3 patients (8.1%).

Conclusions

At our center, BrMs incidence in stage III NSCLC patients was lower than historically reported but notably higher than the incidence described in recent clinical trials. Routine BrMs surveillance potentially allows earlier detection of asymptomatic BrMs. However, asymptomatic BrMs were mostly detected on restaging MRI at the time of recurrence.

The role of targeted therapy and immune therapy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

Brain metastases are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Historically, surgery and radiation therapy have been essential to maintaining disease control within the central nervous system due to poorly penetrant conventional chemotherapy. With the advent of targeted therapy against actionable driver mutations, there is potential to control limited and asymptomatic intracranial disease and delay local therapy until progression. In this review paper, intracranial response rates and clinical outcomes to biological and immune therapies are summarized from the literature and appraised to assist clinical decision making and identify areas for further research. Future clinical trials ought to prioritize patient-centered quality of life and neurocognitive measures as major outcomes and specifically stratify patients based on mutational marker status, disease burden, and symptom acuity.