1
|
Kruyt LM, van der Ploeg JM, Lammers K, van Etten-Debruijn BA, Niemeijer AS, Hakvoort RA. Pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse: evaluation of vaginal discharge and pain during pessary cleaning in an outpatient setting. Int Urogynecol J 2024; 35:333-339. [PMID: 37796331 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05648-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is effective and safe, but long-term continuation is low. Pain and vaginal discharge may play a role. This study was aimed at evaluating vaginal discharge and pain during pessary cleaning in an outpatient setting and in continuous pessary use. METHODS Women with POP who attended the outpatient clinic for pessary cleaning between January and October 2021 were included. Primary outcome was pain during removal and reinsertion of the pessary, measured by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome was vaginal discharge, measured by the NRS and Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGI-C). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify associated variables for pain and discharge. RESULTS A total of 150 women were included. Mean NRS during pessary removal was 4.3 (± 2.7), with 25% of women scoring a 7 or higher. Mean NRS during reinsertion was 1.8 (± 2.0). A smaller genital hiatus and presence of vaginal atrophy or vulvar skin disease were associated with pain during pessary removal. Mean NRS for vaginal discharge was 2.5 (± 2.3). Twenty-five percent of women reported that their vaginal discharge was "(very) much worse" than before they used a pessary. Presence of vaginal erosions was associated with vaginal discharge in this study population. CONCLUSIONS Removing a pessary in an outpatient setting is a painful procedure for many women who use a pessary continuously. Moreover, 25% of these women experience an increase in vaginal discharge while using a pessary. Future research should focus on reducing these disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara M Kruyt
- Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, Martini Hospital, PO Box 30033, 9700 RM, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J Marinus van der Ploeg
- Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, Martini Hospital, PO Box 30033, 9700 RM, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Lammers
- Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ommelander Hospital, Scheemda, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert A Hakvoort
- Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, Martini Hospital, PO Box 30033, 9700 RM, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deffieux X, Pizzoferrato AC, Gaucher L, Rousset-Jablonski C, Le Ray C, Brillac T, Maruani J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Mignot S, Athiel Y, Baffet H, Bailleul A, Bernard V, Bourdon M, Cardaillac C, Carneiro Y, Chariot P, Corroenne R, Dabi Y, Dahlem L, Frank S, Freyens A, Grouthier V, Hernandez I, Iraola E, Lambert M, Lauchet N, Legendre G, Le Lous M, Louis-Vahdat C, Martinat Sainte-Beuve A, Masson M, Matteo C, Pinton A, Sabbagh E, Sallee C, Thubert T, Heron I, Artzner F, Tavenet A, Gantois A, Fauconnier A. Pelvic exam in Gynecology and Obstetrics: French Guidelines for Clinical Practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 291:131-140. [PMID: 37871350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Deffieux
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Clamart F-92140, France.
| | - Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Universitaire de La Miletrie, Poitiers F-86000, France; INSERM CIC 1402, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers F-86000, France
| | - Laurent Gaucher
- Collège National des Sages-Femmes de France, CNSF, Paris F-75010, France; Public Health Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron F-69500, France; INSERM U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon F-69008, France; Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département de Chirurgie, et Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, Lyon F-69000, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Maternité Port Royal, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, APHP, Université Paris Cité, FHU Prema, Paris F-75014, France
| | | | - Julia Maruani
- Cabinet Médical, 6 Rue Docteur Albert Schweitzer, Marseille F-13006, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Paris F-75014, France
| | | | - Yoann Athiel
- Maternité Port Royal, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, APHP, Université Paris Cité, FHU Prema, Paris F-75014, France
| | - Hortense Baffet
- Service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Alexandre Bailleul
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Center Hospitalier de Poissy Saint Germain en Laye, Poissy F-78300, France; Equipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Montigny le Bretonneux F-78180, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Pellegrin, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Université Paris Cité, APHP, Center Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin Port Royal, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction, F-75014, France
| | - Claire Cardaillac
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, Nantes F-44000, France
| | | | - Patrick Chariot
- Département de médecine légale et sociale, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy F-93140, France; Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur Les Enjeux Sociaux, UMR 8156-997, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny F-9300, France
| | - Romain Corroenne
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, Angers F-49000, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Sorbonne université - APHP - Hôpital Tenon, Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Paris F75020, France
| | - Laurence Dahlem
- Département universitaire de médecine générale, Faculté de médecine, Université de Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux F-33076, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Service d'oncogénétique, Institut Curie, Paris F-75005, France
| | - Anne Freyens
- DUMG (Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale), Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse F-31000, France
| | - Virginie Grouthier
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm U1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| | - Isabelle Hernandez
- Département de maïeutique, Center hospitalier de Melun Santepole, Melun F-77000, France
| | - Elisabeth Iraola
- Institut de Recherche interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux (IRIS), UMR 8156-997, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UP13 UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France; Direction de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, Conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, Créteil F-94000, France
| | - Marie Lambert
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Pellegrin, Bordeaux F-33000, France; Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology - Unité Inserm 1312, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - Nadege Lauchet
- Groupe Médical François Perrin, 9 rue François Perrin, Limoges F-87000, France
| | - Guillaume Legendre
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, Angers F-49000, France; UMR_S1085, Université d'Angers, CHU Angers, University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Angers, France
| | - Maela Le Lous
- Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes F-35000, France; Département de gynécologie et obstétrique, CHU de Rennes, Rennes F-35000, France
| | - Christine Louis-Vahdat
- Cabinet de gynécologie et obstétrique, 126 Boulevard Saint Germain, Paris F-75006, France
| | | | - Marine Masson
- Département de médecine générale, Poitiers F-86000, France
| | - Caroline Matteo
- Cabinet de maïeutique, 181 rue du Docteur Cauvin, Marseille F-13015, France
| | - Anne Pinton
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Hôpital Trousseau, APHP, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, Paris F-75012, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris F-75013, France
| | - Emmanuelle Sabbagh
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Paris F-75014, France
| | - Camille Sallee
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Limoges, Limoges F-87000 France
| | - Thibault Thubert
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, Nantes F- 44000, France; Laboratoire Mouvement, Interactions, Performance (MIP), EA 4334, Nantes Université, Nantes F- 44322, France
| | - Isabelle Heron
- Service d'endocrinologie, Université de Rouen, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen F-76000, France; Cabinet médical, 7 rue de Lessard, Rouen F-76100, France
| | - France Artzner
- CIANE, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance, c/o Anne Evrard, 101 rue Pierre Corneille, Lyon F-69003, France
| | - Arounie Tavenet
- ENDOFRANCE, Association de lutte contre l'endométriose. 3 rue de la Gare, Tresilley F-70190, France
| | - Adrien Gantois
- Collège National des Sages-Femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de Santé Périnatal Parisien (RSPP), Paris F75010, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Center Hospitalier de Poissy Saint Germain en Laye, Poissy F-78300, France; Equipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Montigny le Bretonneux F-78180, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yerrabelli RS, Palsgaard PK, Hojati A, Johnson AJW. Improving visualization of the cervix during pelvic exams: A simulation using a physical model of the speculum and human vagina as a steppingstone to reducing disparities in gynecological cancers. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283145. [PMID: 37751425 PMCID: PMC10522035 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic exams are frequently complicated by collapse of the lateral vaginal walls, obstructing the view of the cervix. To overcome this, physicians frequently repurpose a glove or a condom as a sheath placed over the speculum blades to retract the lateral vaginal walls. Despite their regular use in clinical practice, little research has been done comparing the relative efficacy of these methods. Better visualization of the cervix can benefit patients by decreasing examination-related discomfort, improving cancer screening accuracy, and preventing the need to move the examination to the operating room under general anesthesia. This study presents a physical model that simulates vaginal pressure being exerted around a speculum. Using it, we conduct controlled experiments comparing the efficacy of different condom types, glove materials, glove sizes, and techniques to place gloves on the speculum. The results show that the best sheath is the middle finger of nitrile-material gloves. They provide adequate lateral wall retraction without significantly restricting the opening of the speculum. In comparison, condoms provide a smaller amount of retraction due to loosely fitting the speculum. They may still be a reasonable option for a different speculum size. However, vinyl-material gloves are an impractical option for sheaths; they greatly restrict speculum opening, occasionally even breaking the speculum, which overcome its retraction benefits. Glove size, condom brand, and condom material (latex vs polyisoprene) had minimal impact. This study serves as a guide for clinicians as they use easily accessible tools to perform difficult pelvic exams. We recommend that physicians consider nitrile gloves as the preferred option for a sheath around a speculum. Additionally, this study demonstrates proof-of-concept of a physical model that quantitatively describes different materials on their ability to improve cervical access. This model can be used in future research with more speculum and material combinations, including with materials custom-designed for vaginal retraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Sai Yerrabelli
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
- Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Peggy K. Palsgaard
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
- Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Ashkhan Hojati
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
- Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Amy J. Wagoner Johnson
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
- Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deffieux X, Rousset-Jablonski C, Gantois A, Brillac T, Maruani J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Mignot S, Gaucher L, Athiel Y, Baffet H, Bailleul A, Bernard V, Bourdon M, Cardaillac C, Carneiro Y, Chariot P, Corroenne R, Dabi Y, Dahlem L, Frank S, Freyens A, Grouthier V, Hernandez I, Iraola E, Lambert M, Lauchet N, Legendre G, Le Lous M, Louis-Vahdat C, Martinat Sainte-Beuve A, Masson M, Matteo C, Pinton A, Sabbagh E, Sallee C, Thubert T, Heron I, Pizzoferrato AC, Artzner F, Tavenet A, Le Ray C, Fauconnier A. [Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2023; 51:297-330. [PMID: 37258002 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Deffieux
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Département de chirurgie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Adrien Gantois
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | | | - Julia Maruani
- Cabinet médical, 6, rue Docteur-Albert-Schweitzer, 13006 Marseille, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Gaucher
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France, CNSF, 75010 Paris, France; Public Health Unit, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1206 Genève, Suisse
| | - Yoann Athiel
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Hortense Baffet
- Service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bailleul
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France; Équipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Unité Inserm 1312, université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction, université Paris cité, AP-HP, centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Port-Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Claire Cardaillac
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Patrick Chariot
- Département de médecine légale et sociale, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 93140 Bondy, France; Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux, UMR 8156-997, UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Romain Corroenne
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université-AP-HP-hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Dahlem
- Département universitaire de médecine générale, faculté de médecine, université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Service d'oncogénétique, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anne Freyens
- Département universitaire de médecine générale (DUMG), université Paul-Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Grouthier
- Service d'endocrinologie, diabétologie, nutrition et d'endocrinologie des gonades, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire régional de Bordeaux, 31000 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm U1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| | - Isabelle Hernandez
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Iraola
- Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux (IRIS), UMR 8156-997, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UP13 UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France; Direction de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Marie Lambert
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nadege Lauchet
- Groupe médical François-Perrin, 9, rue François-Perrin, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Guillaume Legendre
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, 49000 Angers, France; UMR_S1085, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Angers, France
| | - Maela Le Lous
- Université de Rennes 1, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, 35000 Rennes, France; Département de gynécologie et obstétrique, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Christine Louis-Vahdat
- Cabinet de gynécologie et obstétrique, 126, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | | | - Marine Masson
- Département de médecine générale, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Caroline Matteo
- Ecole de maïeutique, Aix Marseille Université, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Anne Pinton
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Sabbagh
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Camille Sallee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Thibault Thubert
- Service de gynecologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France; EA 4334, laboratoire mouvement, interactions, performance (MIP), Nantes université, 44322 Nantes, France
| | - Isabelle Heron
- Service d'endocrinologie, université de Rouen, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 76000 Rouen, France; Cabinet médical, Clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital universitaire de La Miletrie, 86000 Poitiers, France; Inserm CIC 1402, université de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - France Artzner
- Ciane, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance, c/o Anne Evrard, 101, rue Pierre-Corneille, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Arounie Tavenet
- Endofrance, Association de lutte contre l'endométriose, 3, rue de la Gare, 70190 Tresilley, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gidaszewski B, Khajehei M, McGee T. Outpatient cervical ripening: discomfort/pain during speculum and Foley catheter insertion. Midwifery 2018; 67:57-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|