1
|
Meuser M, Schwitzer S, Thiele M, Boyle P, Ernst A, Basta D. Intra-Cochlear Electrode Position Impacts the Preservation of Residual Hearing in an Animal Model of Cochlear Implant Surgery. Audiol Neurootol 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38981457 DOI: 10.1159/000540266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation remains challenging. There are several approaches to preserve residual hearing, but the configuration of the implant electrode array seems to play a major role. Lateral wall electrode arrays are seemingly more favorable in this context. To date, there are no experimental data available which correlate the spatial electrode position in the scala tympani with the extent of hearing preservation. METHODS Based on micro-computed tomography (µCT) imaging data, this study analyses the exact position of a pure silicone electrode array inserted into the cochlea of four guinea pigs. Array position data were correlated with the extent of hearing loss after implantation, measured using auditory brainstem measurements in the frequency range of the area occupied by the electrode array area as well as apical to the array. RESULTS The use of pure silicone arrays without electrodes resulted in artifact-free, high-resolution µCT images that allowed precise determination of the arrays' positions within the scala tympani. The electrode arrays' locations ranged from peri-modiolar to an anti-modiolar. These revealed a correlation of a lower postoperative hearing loss with a higher spatial proximity to the lateral wall. This correlation was found in the low-frequency range only. A significant correlation between the inter-individual differences in the diameter of the scala tympani and the postoperative hearing loss could not be observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the importance of the intra-cochlear electrode array's position for the preservation of residual hearing. The advantage of such an electrode array's position approximated to the lateral wall suggests, at least for this type of electrode array applied in the guinea pig, it would be advantageous in the preservation of residual hearing for the apical part of the cochlea, beyond the area occupied by the electrode array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Meuser
- Department of Otolaryngology at ukb, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Schwitzer
- Department of Otolaryngology at ukb, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Thiele
- Julius Wolff Institute, Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Regeneration, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Boyle
- Advanced Bionics GmbH, European Research Centre, Hanover, Germany
| | - Arne Ernst
- Department of Otolaryngology at ukb, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dietmar Basta
- Department of Otolaryngology at ukb, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dang S, Kallogjeri D, Dizdar K, Lee D, Bao JW, Varghese J, Walia A, Zhan K, Youssef S, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Herzog JA, Buchman CA, Piccirillo JF, Shew MA. Individual Patient Comorbidities and Effect on Cochlear Implant Performance. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e281-e288. [PMID: 38437816 PMCID: PMC10939851 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between preoperative comorbidities and cochlear implant speech outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS A total of 976 patients who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) between January 2015 and May 2022. Adult patients with follow-up, preoperative audiologic data, and a standardized anesthesia preoperative note were included. EXPOSURE Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) based on standardized anesthesia preoperative notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) score, AzBio Sentence score in quiet, and AzBio + 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Sentence score of the implanted ear at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS A total of 560 patients met inclusion criteria; 112 patients (20%) had no comorbidity, 204 patients (36.4%) had mild comorbidities, 161 patients (28.8%) had moderate comorbidities, and 83 patients (14.8%) had severe comorbidities. Mixed model analysis revealed all comorbidity groups achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in all speech outcome measures over time. This improvement was significantly different between comorbidity groups over time for AzBio Quiet ( p = 0.045) and AzBio + 10 dB SNR ( p = 0.0096). Patients with severe comorbidities had worse outcomes. From preop to 12 months, the estimated marginal mean difference values (95% confidence interval) between the no comorbidity group and the severe comorbidity group were 52.3 (45.7-58.9) and 32.5 (24.6-40.5), respectively, for AzBio Quiet; 39.5 (33.8-45.2) and 21.2 (13.6-28.7), respectively, for AzBio + 10 dB SNR; and 43.9 (38.7-49.0) and 31.1 (24.8-37.4), respectively, for CNC. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidities as assessed by ACE-27 are associated with CI performance. Patients with more severe comorbidities have clinically meaningful improvement but have worse outcome compared to patients with no comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Dang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Karmela Dizdar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - James W Bao
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Jordan Varghese
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kevin Zhan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephanie Youssef
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nedim Durakovic
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Cameron C Wick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacques A Herzog
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jay F Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew A Shew
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geerardyn A, Zhu M, Verhaert N, Quesnel AM. Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:245-255. [PMID: 38270168 PMCID: PMC10922381 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Trauma to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) or spiral ligament (SL) during cochlear implant (CI) insertion segregates with electrode type and induces localized intracochlear ossification and fibrosis. BACKGROUND The goal of atraumatic CI insertion is to preserve intracochlear structures, limit reactive intracochlear tissue formation, and preserve residual hearing. Previous qualitative studies hypothesized a localized effect of trauma on intracochlear tissue formation; however, quantitative studies failed to confirm this. METHODS Insertional trauma beyond the immediate insertion site was histologically assessed in 21 human temporal bones with a CI. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated and virtually resectioned perpendicular to the cochlear spiral at high resolution. The cochlear volume occupied by ossification or fibrosis was determined at the midpoint of the trauma and compared with regions proximal and distal to this point. RESULTS Seven cases, all implanted with precurved electrodes, showed an OSL fracture beyond the immediate insertion site. Significantly more intracochlear ossification was observed at the midpoint of the OSL fracture, compared with the -26 to -18 degrees proximal and 28 to 56 degrees distal to the center. No such pattern was observed for fibrosis. In the 12 cases with a perforation of the SL (9 straight and 3 precurved electrodes), no localized pattern of ossification or fibrosis was observed around these perforations. CONCLUSION OSL fractures were observed exclusively with precurved electrodes in this study and may serve as a nidus for localized intracochlear ossification. Perforation of the SL, in contrast, predominantly occurred with straight electrodes and was not associated with localized ossification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - MengYu Zhu
- Otopathology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vohra V, Andresen NS, Carver C, Dunham R, Marsiglia D, Yeagle J, Della Santina CC, Creighton FX, Bowditch SP, Sun DQ. Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:136-142. [PMID: 38152035 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implant electrode arrays are categorized based on their design as lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LW versus PM designs on postoperative speech perception across multiple manufacturers and over long follow-up durations. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 478 adult cochlear implant recipients, implanted between the years 1992 and 2017. INTERVENTIONSS PM versus LW cochlear implants. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Word (CNC-w) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores between 6 months and 5 years. RESULTS Across 478 patients, approximately one-third received LW (n = 176, 36.8%), whereas 302 patients received a PM array (63.2%). The PM group had higher CNC-w scores from 6 months to 2 years (52 [interquartile range, 38-68] versus 48 [31-62], p = 0.036) and from 2 to 5 years (58 [43-72] versus 48 [33-66], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of patient-averaged scores indicated that the PM group had greater improvement from preoperative scores at all time points after the initial 6 months for both CNC-w ( β = 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-8.3], p = 0.023) and HINT testing ( β = 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.7], p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that PM electrode arrays are associated with small increases in postoperative speech perception scores, relative to LW arrays, when assessed across manufacturers, over long time durations, and using multiple outcome instruments. These findings may help guide surgeon selection and patient counseling of cochlear implant arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas S Andresen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Courtney Carver
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rachel Dunham
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dawn Marsiglia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jenifer Yeagle
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Charles C Della Santina
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Francis X Creighton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen P Bowditch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Q Sun
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patro A, Lindquist NR, Schauwecker N, Holder JT, Perkins EL, Haynes DS, Tawfik KO. Comparison of Speech Recognition and Hearing Preservation Outcomes Between the Mid-Scala and Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:52-57. [PMID: 38013487 PMCID: PMC10842140 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess speech recognition and hearing preservation (HP) outcomes with the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ electrodes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS A total of 237 adult patients implanted between 2013 and 2020 (Mid-Scala, n = 136; SlimJ, n = 101). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) and AzBio (Arizona Biomedical) scores at 6 and 12 months; postoperative HP, defined as low-frequency pure-tone average ≤ 80 dB HL; scalar position. RESULTS Mean CNC scores did not significantly differ between Mid-Scala and SlimJ recipients at 6 (45.8% versus 46.0%, p = 0.962) and 12 (51.9% versus 48.8%, p = 0.363) months. Similarly, mean AzBio in quiet scores were equivalent for both groups at 6 (55.1% versus 59.2%, p = 0.334) and 12 (60.6% versus 62.3%, p = 0.684) months. HP rates were significantly higher with the SlimJ (48.4%) than the Mid-Scala (30.8%; p = 0.033). Scalar translocations were 34.8 and 16.1% for the Mid-Scala and SlimJ groups, respectively ( p = 0.019). Ears with postoperative HP had significantly fewer scalar translocations (16.7% versus 37.2%, p = 0.048), and postoperative HP was associated with higher AzBio in noise scores at the most recent follow-up interval (38.7% versus 25.1%, p = 0.042). CNC, AzBio in quiet and noise, low-frequency pure-tone average shifts, and PTA at 6 and 12 months were not significantly different between patients with scala tympani insertions of the SlimJ versus the Mid-Scala ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the Mid-Scala, the lateral wall electrode has superior HP rates and fewer scalar translocations, whereas speech recognition scores are equivalent between both electrode arrays. These findings can help providers with electrode selection and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Nathan R. Lindquist
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Natalie Schauwecker
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jourdan T. Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth L. Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David S. Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kareem O. Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhan KY, Walia A, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Buchman CA, Shew MA, Herzog JA. One-Year Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes Comparing Slim Modiolar and Lateral Wall Arrays. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:340-347. [PMID: 36814321 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compare postoperative speech outcomes in hearing preservation (HP) cochlear implantation (CI) patients with a low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤ 60 dB using 2 electrode array designs. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Large academic cochlear implant referral center. METHODS We reviewed adult HP CI cases using either the slim modiolar electrode (SME) (CI 532/CI 632) or th slim lateral wall electrode (SLWE) (CI 624). One-year speech outcomes and HP status were the primary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 132 implanted ears were analyzed (mean age 73.1 years, standard deviation [SD] 12.6), with 72% (N = 95) with CI 532/632 and 28% (N = 37) with CI 624. The mean preoperative LFPTA was 44.8 dB, SD 11.8. One-year functional HP was 27.2% (mean LFPTA shift 46.1 dB, SD 22.1) and was as follows: SME 23.9% and SLWE 36.4%, p = .168. The mean age at implantation was significantly younger only in SLWE patients with preserved hearing (66.9 vs 80.3 years, p = .008). At 6 months, speech measures were significantly better in all outcomes in HP patients with an SLWE than nonpreserved SLWE patients; this effect abated at 1 year as performance among nonpreserved SLWE patients became equivalent to the remaining cohort. Speech outcomes in SME patients were similar regardless of HP status. Age at implantation and datalogging was correlated with speech outcomes. CONCLUSION In this cohort of HP patients, a 1-year functional HP rate of 23.9% (SME) and 36.4% (SLWE) was observed (p = 0.168). This was initially 57.1% (SME) and 70.3% (SLWE) at activation, p = .172. Datalogging and age at implantation were correlated with postoperative speech outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Y Zhan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nedim Durakovic
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Cameron C Wick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew A Shew
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jacques A Herzog
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology and Neurotology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weller T, Timm ME, Lenarz T, Büchner A. Cochlear coverage with lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays affects post-operative speech recognition. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287450. [PMID: 37437046 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal was to investigate the relationship between the insertion angle/cochlear coverage of cochlear implant electrode arrays and post-operative speech recognition scores in a large cohort of patients implanted with lateral wall electrode arrays. METHODS Pre- and post-operative cone beam computed tomography scans of 154 ears implanted with lateral wall electrode arrays were evaluated. Traces of lateral wall and electrode arrays were combined into a virtual reconstruction of the implanted cochlea. This reconstruction was used to measure insertion angles and proportional cochlear coverage. Word recognition scores and sentence recognition scores measured 12 months after implantation using electric-only stimulation were used to examine the relationship between cochlear coverage/insertion angle and implantation outcomes. RESULTS Post-operative word recognition scores and the difference between post- and pre-operative word recognition scores were positively correlated with both cochlear coverage and insertion angle, however sentence recognition scores were not. A group-wise comparison of word recognition scores revealed that patients with cochlear coverage below 70% performed significantly worse than patients with coverage between 79%-82% (p = 0.003). Performance of patients with coverage above 82% was on average poorer than between 79%-82, although this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.84). Dividing the cohort into groups based on insertion angle quadrants revealed that word recognition scores were highest above 450° insertion angle, sentence recognition scores were highest between 450° and 630° and the difference between pre- and post-operative word recognition scores was largest between 540° and 630°, however none of these differences reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that cochlear coverage has an effect on post-operative word recognition abilities and the benefit patients receive from their implant. Generally, higher coverage led to better outcomes, however there were results indicating that insertion past 82% cochlear coverage may not provide an additional benefit for word recognition. These findings can be useful for choosing the optimal electrode array and thereby improving cochlear implantation outcomes on a patient-individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Weller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Max Eike Timm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Hearing Center (DHZ), Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All", Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thomas JP, Klein H, Haubitz I, Dazert S, Völter C. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040633. [PMID: 37109019 PMCID: PMC10142378 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiological high-resolution computed tomography-based evaluation of cochlear implant candidates’ cochlear duct length (CDL) has become the method of choice for electrode array selection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if MRI-based data match CT-based data and if this impacts on electrode array choice. Methods: Participants were 39 children. CDL, length at two turns, diameters, and height of the cochlea were determined via CT and MRI by three raters using tablet-based otosurgical planning software. Personalized electrode array length, angular insertion depth (AID), intra- and interrater differences, and reliability were calculated. Results: Mean intrarater difference of CT- versus MRI-based CDL was 0.528 ± 0.483 mm without significant differences. Individual length at two turns differed between 28.0 mm and 36.6 mm. Intrarater reliability between CT versus MRI measurements was high (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.929–0.938). Selection of the optimal electrode array based on CT and MRI matched in 90.1% of cases. Mean AID was 629.5° based on the CT and 634.6° based on the MRI; this is not a significant difference. ICC of the mean interrater reliability was 0.887 for the CT-based evaluation and 0.82 for the MRI-based evaluation. Conclusion: MRI-based CDL measurement shows a low intrarater difference and a high interrater reliability and is therefore suitable for personalized electrode array selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Peter Thomas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Johannes Hospital, Cath. St. Paulus Society, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Johannesstr. 9-17, 44137 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Hannah Klein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Imme Haubitz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sharma RK, Smetak MR, Patro A, Lindquist NR, Perkins EL, Holder JT, Haynes DS, Tawfik KO. Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:1149-1154. [PMID: 36201525 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays. INTERVENTIONS Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models. CONCLUSION During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection. LEARNING OBJECTIVE To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight). DESIRED RESULT To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III. INDICATE IRB OR IACUC Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul K Sharma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Miriam R Smetak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Ankita Patro
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Nathan R Lindquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Elizabeth L Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | | | - David S Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Kareem O Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh J, Singh RK, Mishra SK, Jha S. Effect of the vertical facial canal to round window distance concerning neural response telemetry during cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 163:111349. [PMID: 36308882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the correlation of the distance from the round window (RW) to the vertical facial canal (VFC) with neural response telemetry thresholds (T-NRT), which may have an influence on the insertion trajectory and aid in preoperative surgical planning and electrode selection. METHODS An observational study was conducted on 30 prelingually deaf children under five years diagnosed with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss and received a cochlear implant. The preoperative high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images in the axial cut bone window setting at the round window level was used to calculate the distance from the RW to the VFC on the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer. The intraoperative distance was measured with ScopyDoc version 8.2.4 software. In Auto-NRT mode, software-based recordings (Cochlear's Custom Sound EP 6.0) were used to measure and evaluate the T-NRT current level. RESULTS A statistically significant positive correlation of the RW to VFC distance with the average T-NRT p = 0.02, r = -0.4 and with the mid-frequency, T-NRT p = 0.003, r = -0.5 was found. CONCLUSION The insertion trajectory can be ascertained by a statistically significant correlation between average T-NRT and mid-frequency T-NRT with RW and VFC distance, and this reliable factor can be taken into account in future surgical technique modulation, electrode selection, and electrode design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyoti Singh
- Department of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar Singh
- Department of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
| | | | - Shruti Jha
- Department of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xiu B, Paul BT, Chen JM, Le TN, Lin VY, Dimitrijevic A. Neural responses to naturalistic audiovisual speech are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1043499. [DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1043499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a weak relationship between clinical and self-reported speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Such poor correspondence may be due to differences in clinical and “real-world” listening environments and stimuli. Speech in the real world is often accompanied by visual cues, background environmental noise, and is generally in a conversational context, all factors that could affect listening demand. Thus, our objectives were to determine if brain responses to naturalistic speech could index speech perception and listening demand in CI users. Accordingly, we recorded high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) while CI users listened/watched a naturalistic stimulus (i.e., the television show, “The Office”). We used continuous EEG to quantify “speech neural tracking” (i.e., TRFs, temporal response functions) to the show’s soundtrack and 8–12 Hz (alpha) brain rhythms commonly related to listening effort. Background noise at three different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), +5, +10, and +15 dB were presented to vary the difficulty of following the television show, mimicking a natural noisy environment. The task also included an audio-only (no video) condition. After each condition, participants subjectively rated listening demand and the degree of words and conversations they felt they understood. Fifteen CI users reported progressively higher degrees of listening demand and less words and conversation with increasing background noise. Listening demand and conversation understanding in the audio-only condition was comparable to that of the highest noise condition (+5 dB). Increasing background noise affected speech neural tracking at a group level, in addition to eliciting strong individual differences. Mixed effect modeling showed that listening demand and conversation understanding were correlated to early cortical speech tracking, such that high demand and low conversation understanding occurred with lower amplitude TRFs. In the high noise condition, greater listening demand was negatively correlated to parietal alpha power, where higher demand was related to lower alpha power. No significant correlations were observed between TRF/alpha and clinical speech perception scores. These results are similar to previous findings showing little relationship between clinical speech perception and quality-of-life in CI users. However, physiological responses to complex natural speech may provide an objective measure of aspects of quality-of-life measures like self-perceived listening demand.
Collapse
|
12
|
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175156. [PMID: 36079089 PMCID: PMC9457208 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Hearing-related quality of life (QoL) after cochlear implantation (CI) is as important as audiological performance. We evaluated the functional results and QoL after CI in a heterogeneous patient cohort with emphasis on patients with long-term deafness (>10 years). Methods: Twenty-eight patients (n = 32 implanted ears, within n = 12 long-term deaf ears) implanted with a mid-scala electrode array were included in this retrospective mono-centric cohort study. Speech intelligibility for monosyllables (SIM), speech reception thresholds (SRT50) and QoL with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were registered. Correlation of SIM and QoL was analyzed. Results: SIM and SRT50 improved significantly 12 months postoperatively up to 54.8 ± 29.1% and 49.3 ± 9.6 dB SPL, respectively. SIM progressively improved up to 1 year, but some early-deafened, late implanted patients developed speech understanding several years after implantation. The global and all subdomain QoL scores increased significantly up to 12 months postoperatively and we found a correlation of SIM and global QoL score at 12 months postoperatively. Several patients of the “poor performer” (SIM < 40%) group reported high improvement of hearing-related QoL. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation provides a benefit in hearing-related QoL, even in some patients with low postoperative speech intelligibility results. Consequently, hearing-related QoL scores should be routinely used as outcome measure beside standard speech understanding tests, as well. Further studies with a prospective multi-centric design are needed to identify factors influencing post-implantation functional results and QoL in the patient group of long-term deafness.
Collapse
|
13
|
Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:797-802. [PMID: 35878634 PMCID: PMC9335896 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although adult cochlear implant (CI) outcomes have primarily focused on speech recognition scores, the rigorous development of a CI-specific patient-reported outcome measure provides an opportunity for a more comprehensive and ecologically valid approach to measure the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users. Here, we report for the first time normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and global scores and variance for a large, multi-institutional sample of adult CI users. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study design. SETTING CI centers in the United States. PATIENTS Seven hundred five adults with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss with at least 1 year of CI use. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global scores. RESULTS During the development of the CIQOL instruments, 1,000 CI users from all regions of the United States were invited to participate in studies. Of these, 705 (70.5%) completed all portions of the study, and their data are reported here. Mean CIQOL domain scores were highest (indicating better function) for the emotional and social domains and lowest for listening effort. The entertainment and social domains demonstrated the widest distribution of scores and largest standard deviations, indicating greatest variability in function. Overall, there were minimal ceiling and floor effects for all domains. CONCLUSION Normative scores from a large sample of experienced adult CI users are consistent with clinical observations, showing large differences in functional abilities and large variability. Normative CIQOL data for adult CI users have the potential to enhance preoperative discussions with CI candidates, improve post-CI activation monitoring, and establish standards for CI centers.
Collapse
|
14
|
Aminpour N, Levin L, Finkbone M, Morikawa M, Blumgart M, Kim HJ, Hoa M. Review of Speech Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients at a Nascent Cochlear Implant Program. Cureus 2022; 14:e22543. [PMID: 35345736 PMCID: PMC8956478 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The use of cochlear implantation to rehabilitate moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss has become more widespread; however, the adult utilization rate of cochlear implant candidates is still very less. The study aims to examine the percentage of adult patients in a heterogeneous group of cochlear implant recipients at a nascent cochlear implant program who demonstrate improvements in speech outcomes. Methods: Speech outcome scores were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at three, six, and 12-month intervals using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words and AzBio sentences in quiet. Mean speech outcome scores at each time point and binomial distribution tables with 95% CI were used to assess individual improvement in speech understanding. Results: 45 patients underwent a total of 49 cochlear implantation surgeries. The mean age at surgery was 62 years. The mean preoperative CNC score in the ear to be implanted was 18%±18, while the mean postoperative CNC score at three, six, and 12 months was 35%±21, 44%±23, and 45%±25, respectively. The mean preoperative AzBio score in the ear to be implanted was 22%±26 while the mean postoperative AzBio score at three, six, and 12 months was 50%±29, 56%±27, and 63%±26, respectively. Of the implantations, 74% (32 of 43) and 69% (22 of 32) showed significant improvement at six months or one year using AzBio and CNC binomial distribution tables, respectively. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception following cochlear implantation for patients not benefiting from hearing aid aural rehabilitation. The study provides realistic expectations for new and emerging programs hoping to demonstrate cochlear implant utility for improving patients’ speech outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Brown KD, Pillsbury HC, Dedmon MM, O'Connell BP. Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:183-189. [PMID: 34772886 PMCID: PMC8752482 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 1) To compare speech recognition outcomes between cochlear implant (CI) recipients of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays, and 2) to characterize the relationship between angular insertion depth (AID) and speech recognition. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Seventy-five adult CI recipients of fully inserted 28-mm (n = 28) or 31.5-mm (n = 47) lateral wall arrays listening with a CI-alone device. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation with postoperative computed tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition assessed with the CI-alone at 12 months postactivation. RESULTS The mean AID of the most apical electrode contact for the 31.5-mm array recipients was significantly deeper than the 28-mm array recipients (628° vs 571°, p < 0.001). Following 12 months of listening experience, mean CNC word scores were significantly better for recipients of 31.5-mm arrays compared with those implanted with 28-mm arrays (59.5% vs 48.3%, p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.70; 95% CI [0.22, 1.18]). There was a significant positive correlation between AID and CNC word scores (r = 0.372, p = 0.001), with a plateau in performance observed around 600°. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implant recipients implanted with a 31.5-mm array experienced better speech recognition than those with a 28-mm array at 12 months postactivation. Deeper insertion of a lateral wall array appears to confer speech recognition benefit up to ∼600°, with a plateau in performance observed thereafter. These data provide preliminary evidence of the insertion depth necessary to optimize speech recognition outcomes for lateral wall electrode arrays among CI-alone users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jwair S, Boerboom RA, Versnel H, Stokroos RJ, Thomeer HGXM. Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:895. [PMID: 34886884 PMCID: PMC8656003 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05878-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a “straight” lateral wall lying electrode array (LW) or a “pre-curved” perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in hearing preservation outcomes between the four possible treatment options. Methods We designed a monocenter, multi-arm, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of an electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is the comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar translocation, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG). Discussion Cochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relatively simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8586. Registered on 4 May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05878-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Jwair
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Ralf A Boerboom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Huib Versnel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans G X M Thomeer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Long-term Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception Performance Outcomes With the Slim Modiolar Electrode. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e1486-e1493. [PMID: 34510116 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe audiologic outcomes in hearing preservation (HP) cochlear implant candidates using a slim modiolar electrode (SME). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Two hundred three adult cochlear implant patients with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤ 80 dB HL that received the SME. INTERVENTION Implantation with a SME electrode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was postoperative HP, defined as LFPTA ≤80 dB HL. HP status was analyzed at "early" (activation or 3 mo) and "long-term" (6 or 12 mo) time frames using the patient's worst audiogram. Speech perception tests were compared between HP and non-HP cohorts. RESULTS Of the 203 HP candidates, the tip fold-over rate was 7.4%. The mean shifts in LFPTA at the "early" and "long-term" time points were 25.9 ± 16.2 dB HL and 29.6 ± 16.9 dB HL, respectively. Of 117 patients with preoperative LFPTA ≤60 dB HL, the early and long-term mean LFPTA shifts were 19.5 ± 12.3 dB HL and 32.6 ± 17.2 dB HL, respectively; early and long-term HP rates were 61.1% and 50.8%, respectively. For patients with preoperative LFPTA ≤80 dB HL, early and long-term HP rates were 45.5% and 43.7%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in postoperative speech perception performance (CNC, AzBio, HINT) at 3, 6, or 12 months between HP versus non-HP groups. CONCLUSIONS HP is feasible using the SME. While electroacoustic stimulation was not studied in this cohort, HP provided no clear advantage in speech perception abilities in this group of patients. The current reporting standard of what constitutes HP candidacy (preoperative LFPTA ≤80 dB HL) should be reconsidered.
Collapse
|
18
|
Selleck AM, Dillon M, Perkins E, Brown KD. Cochlear Implantation in the Setting of Menière's Disease After Labyrinthectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e973-e979. [PMID: 34049331 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize the speech recognition and sound source localization of patients with unilateral Menière's disease who undergo labyrinthectomy for vertigo control with simultaneous or sequential cochlear implantation. DATABASES REVIEWED PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. METHODS The search was performed on May 6, 2020. The keywords utilized included: "Menière's disease AND cochlear implant;" "cochlear implant AND single sided deafness;" "cochlear implant AND vestibular;" and "labyrinthectomy AND cochlear implant." Manuscripts published in English with a publication date after 1995 that assessed adult subjects (≥18 years of age) were included for review. Subjects must have been diagnosed with Menière's disease unilaterally and underwent labyrinthectomy with simultaneous or sequential cochlear implantation. Reported outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) use included speech recognition as measured with the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word test and/or sound source localization reported in root-mean squared (RMS) error. The method of data collection and study type were recorded to assess level of evidence. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS Data from 14 CI recipients met the criteria for inclusion. Word recognition comparisons between the preoperative interval and a postactivation interval demonstrated a significant improvement with the CI (p = 0.014), with an average improvement of 23% (range -16 to 50%). Sound source localization postoperatively with the CI demonstrated an average RMS error of 26° (SD 6.8, range 18.7-43.1°) compared to the 42° (SD 19.1, range 18-85°) in the preoperative or CI off condition, these two conditions were not statistically different (p = 0.148). CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation and labyrinthectomy in adult patients with Menière's disease can support improvements in speech recognition and sound source localization for some CI users, though observed performance may be poorer than traditional CI candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Morgan Selleck
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Margaret Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
MacPhail ME, Connell NT, Totten DJ, Gray MT, Pisoni D, Yates CW, Nelson RF. Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Slim Straight and Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:943-950. [PMID: 34399646 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211036339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare differences in audiologic outcomes between slim modiolar electrode (SME) CI532 and slim lateral wall electrode (SLW) CI522 cochlear implant recipients. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary academic hospital. METHODS Comparison of postoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet (percentage correct) in adult cochlear implant recipients with SME or SLW matched for preoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet and aided and unaided pure tone average. RESULTS Patients with SLW (n = 52) and patients with SME (n = 37) had a similar mean (SD) age (62.0 [18.2] vs 62.6 [14.6] years, respectively), mean preoperative aided pure tone average (55.9 [20.4] vs 58.1 [16.4] dB; P = .59), and mean AzBio score (percentage correct, 11.1% [13.3%] vs 8.0% [11.5%]; P = .25). At last follow-up (SLW vs SME, 9.0 [2.9] vs 9.9 [2.6] months), postoperative mean AzBio scores in quiet were not significantly different (percentage correct, 70.8% [21.3%] vs 65.6% [24.5%]; P = .29), and data log usage was similar (12.9 [4.0] vs 11.3 [4.1] hours; P = .07). In patients with preoperative AzBio <10% correct, the 6-month mean AzBio scores were significantly better with SLW than SME (percentage correct, 70.6% [22.9%] vs 53.9% [30.3%]; P = .02). The intraoperative tip rollover rate was 8% for SME and 0% for SLW. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implantation with SLW and SME provides comparable improvement in audiologic functioning. SME does not exhibit superior speech recognition outcomes when compared with SLW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan T Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas J Totten
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mitchell T Gray
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - David Pisoni
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Charles W Yates
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Rick F Nelson
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. The primary objective of this study is to identify the biographic, audiologic, and electrode position factors that influence speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a device from a single manufacturer. The secondary objective is to investigate the independent association of the type of electrode (precurved or straight) with speech perception.
Collapse
|
21
|
Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments. Ear Hear 2021; 42:896-908. [PMID: 33735907 PMCID: PMC8222065 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may provide a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the real-world experiences of cochlear implant (CI) users and complement information obtained from speech recognition outcomes. To address this unmet clinical need, the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile instrument and CIQOL-10 Global measure were developed according to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) and COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The CIQOL-35 Profile consists of 35 items in six domain constructs (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social) and the CIQOL-10 Global contains 10 items that provide an overall CIQOL score. The present study compares psychometric properties of the newly developed CIQOL instruments to two legacy PROMs commonly used in adult CI users. DESIGN Using a prospective cohort design, a sample of 334 adult CI users recruited from across the United States provided responses to (1) the CIQOL instruments; (2) a CI-specific PROM (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, NCIQ); and (3) a general-health PROM (Health Utilities Index 3 [HUI-3]). Responses were obtained again after 1 mo. The reliability and validity of the CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments were compared with the legacy PROMs (NCIQ and HUI-3). Psychometric properties and construct validity of each instrument were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory (IRT), and test-retest reliability (using Pearson's correlations), where appropriate. RESULTS All six CIQOL-35 Profile domains and the CIQOL-10 Global instrument demonstrated adequate to strong construct validity. The majority of the NCIQ subdomains and NCIQ total score had substantial confirmatory factor analysis model misfit, representing poor construct validity. Therefore, IRT analysis could only be applied to the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. IRT results showed strong psychometric properties for all CIQOL-35 Profile domains, the CIQOL-10 Global instrument, and the basic sound performance and activity limitation subdomains of the NCIQ. Test-retest reliability was strong for the CIQOL-35 Profile, CIQOL-10 Global, and NCIQ, but moderate to weak for the HUI-3; the hearing score of the HUI-3 demonstrated the weakest reliability. CONCLUSION The CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global are more psychometrically sound and comprehensive than the NCIQ and the HUI-3 for assessing QOL in adult CI users. Due to poor reliability, we do not recommend using the HUI-3 to measure QOL in this population. With validation and psychometric analyses complete, the CIQOL-35 Profile measure and CIQOL-10 Global instrument are now ready for use in clinical and research settings to measure QOL and real-world functional abilities of adult CI users.
Collapse
|
22
|
The Effect of Ultra-slow Velocities on Insertion Forces: A Study Using a Highly Flexible Straight Electrode Array. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e1013-e1021. [PMID: 33883518 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study sought to 1) characterize insertion forces resulting from a flexible straight electrode array (EA) inserted at slow and ultra-slow insertion velocities, and 2) evaluate if ultra-slow velocities decrease insertion forces independent of other variables. BACKGROUND Low insertion forces are desirable in cochlear implant (CI) surgery to reduce trauma and preserve hearing. Recently, ultra-slow insertion velocities (lower than manually feasible) have been shown to produce significantly lower insertion forces using other EAs. METHODS Five flexible straight EAs were used to record insertion forces into an inelastic artificial scala tympani model. Eleven trial recordings were performed for each EA at five predetermined automated, continuous insertion velocities ranging from 0.03 to 1.6 mm/s. RESULTS An ultra-slow insertion velocity of 0.03 mm/s resulted in a median insertion force of 0.010 N at 20 mm of insertion depth, and 0.026 N at 24.3 mm-the final insertion depth. These forces represent only 24 to 29% of those measured using 1.6 mm/s. After controlling for insertion depth of the EA into the artificial scala tympani model and trial insertion number, decreasing the insertion velocity from 0.4 to 0.03 mm/s resulted in a 50% decrease in the insertion forces. CONCLUSION Using the tested EA ultra-slow velocities can decrease insertion forces, independent of variables like insertion depth. Our results suggest ultra-slow velocities can reduce insertion forces at least 60%, compared with humanly feasible continuous velocities (≥0.9 mm/s).
Collapse
|
23
|
Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol 2021; 41:e227-e231. [PMID: 31789794 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quantify the relationship between average hours of processor use per day and measures of speech recognition in post-lingually deafened adults with cochlear implants. SETTING Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Three hundred adult (mean age = 64, 130 women) CI users were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Correlation analyses were completed for CI-aided speech recognition (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant [CNC] monosyllables and AzBio sentences) at approximately 12 months post-implantation and average hours of processor use per day, which was extracted from the CI programming software. RESULTS Average processor use was 10.2 hours per day (range, 0.1-22.7), and average speech recognition scores were 49.9 and 61.7% for CNC and AzBio sentence recognition, respectively. We found a strong, significant correlation between hours of processor use per day and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition (rs = 0.61, p < 0.0001) and AzBio sentence recognition (rs = 0.56, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that highest speech recognition outcomes are correlated with greater than 10 hours of CI use per day. Further research is needed to assess the causal link between daily CI use and speech recognition abilities.
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhao EE, Dornhoffer JR, Loftus C, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 146:613-620. [PMID: 32407461 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Multiple studies have evaluated associations between post-cochlear implant (CI) speech recognition outcomes and patient-related factors. Current literature often appears equivocal or contradictory, so little is known about the factors that contribute to successful speech recognition outcomes with CIs. Objective To use a meta-analysis to pool data from the extant literature and provide an objective summary of existing evidence on associations of patient-related factors and CI speech recognition outcomes. Data Sources A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases in January 2019 using the following search terms: cochlear implant or cochlear implants or cochlear implantation and speech recognition or word recognition or sentence recognition. Studies of postlingually deafened adult CI recipients that reported word or sentence recognition scores were included. Study Selection Inclusion criteria were postlingual adult CI recipients 18 years or older with word or sentence recognition scores at minimum 6-month postimplantation. Studies that included patients undergoing revision or reimplantation surgery were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 1809 unique articles underwent review by abstract, and 121 articles underwent full-text review, resulting in 13 articles of 1095 patients for a meta-analysis of correlations. Random-effects model was used when the heterogeneity test yielded a low P value (P < .05). Main Outcomes and Measures The planned primary outcome was the pooled correlation values between postimplant speech recognition scores and patient-related factors. Results Of the 1095 patients included from the 13 studies, the mean age at implantation ranged from 51.2 to 63.7 years and the mean duration of hearing loss ranged from 9.5 to 31.8 years; for the 825 patients for whom sex was reported, 421 (51.0%) were women. A weak negative correlation was observed between age at implantation and postimplant sentence recognition in quiet (r = -0.31 [95% CI, -0.41 to -0.20]). Other correlations between patient-related factors and postimplant word or sentence recognition were statistically significant, but all correlations were absent to negligible (r = 0.02-0.27). Conclusions and Relevance Given that most associations were weak, negligible, or absent, patient-related factors often thought to affect CI speech recognition ability offer limited assistance in clinical decision-making in cochlear implantation. Additional research is needed to identify patient-related and other factors that predict CI outcomes, including speech recognition and other important variables related to success with CIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise E Zhao
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | | | | | | - Ted A Meyer
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42:102773. [PMID: 33161258 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate speech understanding outcomes in a large adult cohort who demonstrated poor hearing performance with well fit hearing aids in the unilateral and bilateral or bimodal listening conditions at preimplant, 3-, 6- and 12-months. SUBJECTS Post-linguistically deafened adults (N = 100) with bilateral moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and limited functional benefit from well fit bilateral hearing aids. METHOD A multicenter, prospective, repeated-measures, within-subject controlled study was conducted. All subjects were implanted with a Slim Modiolar cochlear implant and were required to use bimodal stimulation (cochlear implant and hearing aid in contralateral ear) for 6-months postimplant and optionally to 12-months. Evaluations included: speech recognition for monosyllabic consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet; AzBio sentences in coincident noise (at +5 and +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)), in implant ear and bimodal conditions. All speech tests were performed at preimplant and 6-months postimplant for primary endpoint outcomes, and a subset of speech tests at 3- and 12-months. RESULTS In the implant ear only, at 3-, 6- and 12-months postimplant, 84%, 93% and 97% of subjects respectively, demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 12-months, a mean gain of 51% points, for monosyllabic words and 32% points for sentences in noise was observed (p < 0.001). In the bimodal condition, at 6-months postimplant, 87% of subjects demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant bilateral hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 6-months, a mean gain of 40% points, for monosyllabic words was observed (p < 0.001). Speech scores for sentences in noise significantly improved for the bimodal condition at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001). In addition to speech scores for the implanted ear, bimodal condition scores demonstrated further increments, especially for sentences in noise at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Results support that bimodal hearing is superior to bilateral hearing aids in this cohort of bilateral moderate-to-profound adult hearing aid users. Our study cohort demonstrated significant improvements for speech scores for the cochlear implant (CI) ear only and bimodal conditions compared to the baseline preimplant unilateral and bilateral hearing aid conditions respectively. The greatest gain in performance was in the first three months of device use with incremental improvement through 12 months. These findings indicate that when hearing aids fit to National Acoustics Laboratory (NAL-1) targets do not provide the necessary audibility needed for speech recognition, referral for CI-candidacy evaluation is strongly recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clintrial.govNCT03007472. Registered 01/02/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007472?term=clinical+evaluation+of+the+nucleus+CI532&draw=2&rank=2.
Collapse
|
26
|
Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H, Thomeer HGXM. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:1358-1368. [PMID: 33159469 PMCID: PMC8246990 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation. Study Design Systematic review. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold‐over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Results We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta‐analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold‐over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X2 = 6.8, P < .01). Conclusions Scalar translocation and tip fold‐overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358–1368, 2021
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Jwair
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus Prins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Wegner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Huib Versnel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans G X M Thomeer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize differences in adult cochlear implant outcomes and programming parameters for a straight (CI422/522) and a precurved (CI532) electrode array. SETTING Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary otologic center. PATIENTS Fifty-eight adults were included in the study; 29 were implanted with CI422 or CI522 and 29 were implanted with CI532. Each CI532 recipient was matched to a CI422/522 recipient in terms of age and preoperative hearing thresholds for comparison purposes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words, AzBio sentences, residual audiometric thresholds, and Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire collected 6 months postoperatively were used to characterize outcomes. Pulse duration, maxima, impedances, and overall charge measurements were used to characterize programming parameters. RESULTS Postoperative unaided low frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) was significantly better for the CI532 group. CNC scores were significantly better for the CI532 group. Impedances and pulse duration were significantly lower for the CI532 group, but there was no difference in overall charge between the groups. CONCLUSION The CI532 group showed either similar or statistically superior results on all measures when compared with the CI422/522 suggesting that the CI532 electrode may be an advantageous substitute for the CI522.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of electrode length on hearing preservation (HP) in Partial Deafness Treatment–Electrical Complement (PDT-EC) subjects.
Collapse
|
29
|
Assessing Cochlear Implant Insertion Angle From an Intraoperative X-ray Using a Rotating 3D Helical Scala Tympani Model. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e686-e694. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
30
|
Slim Perimodiolar Arrays Are as Effective as Slim Lateral Wall Arrays for Functional Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e674-e679. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|