Application of Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator for Decompression of the Internal Auditory Canal via the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach

Piezoelectric ear surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The piezoelectric instrument (PEI) offers a novel technique for bone removal in ear surgery with a combination of micro-oscillation and cavitation. The aim of this review is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this instrument in comparison to the drill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The primary selection included all studies reporting on the use of PEI in ear surgery or its effect on the inner ear. Only studies with a control group were included in the secondary selection.

RESULTS

The first search identified 49 studies between 2003 and 2022. These reported on a total of 1162 ear operations, during which PEI was used for various indications. Most data were based on uncontrolled retrospective studies or case reports (76%). Only one of the five controlled clinical studies was prospective and randomized. The advantages of PEI weighed against its limitations and disadvantages were critically analyzed in comparison to the drill.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric surgery is an innovative and promising surgical technique in the temporal bone. PEI appears to enable safer and more precise bone removal in close proximity to soft tissue when compared to the drill. The slower bone removal and cost factors represent current limitations to its wider use in ear surgery.

Thermal Analysis of an Ultrasonic Aspirator Micro Claw Tool Compared With Standard High-Speed Drilling During Internal Auditory Canal Opening in a Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

The ultrasonic aspirator micro claw tool (UAmCT) can be used to remove the bone of the internal auditory canal (IAC) during vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) without the risk of a spinning drill shaft. However, the thermal profile of the UAmCT during IAC removal has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the thermal profile of the UAmCT during access of the IAC to that of a conventional high-speed drill (HSD) and to present an illustrative case of this application.

METHODS

IAC opening via RSA was performed in 5 embalmed cadaveric specimens using the UAmCT with 3, 8, and 15 mL/min irrigation on the left and the HSD at 75 000 revolutions per minute and 0%, 14%, and 22% irrigation on the right. Peak bone surface temperatures were measured 4 times in 20-second intervals, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. An illustrative case of a vestibular schwannoma resected via an RSA using the UAmCT to access the IAC is presented.

RESULTS

The IAC was opened in all 5 specimens using both the UAmCT and HSD without complication. The mean peak bone surface temperatures were significantly lower with the UAmCT compared with the HSD ( P < .001). The UAmCT did not meaningfully prolong the operating time in the illustrative case, and the IAC was accessed without complication.

CONCLUSION

The UAmCT may be a safe and effective alternative to HSD for IAC opening during vestibular schwannoma resection via the RSA. Larger studies under clinical conditions are required to further validate these findings.

[Piezoelectric ear surgery: a systematic review. German version]

BACKGROUND

The piezoelectric instrument (PEI) offers a novel technique for bone removal in ear surgery with a combination of micro-oscillation and cavitation. The aim of this review is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this instrument in comparison to the drill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The primary selection included all studies reporting on the use of PEI in ear surgery or its effect on the inner ear. Only studies with a control group were included in the secondary selection.

RESULTS

The first search identified 49 studies between 2003 and 2022. These reported on a total of 1162 ear operations, during which PEI was used for various indications. Most data were based on uncontrolled retrospective studies or case reports (76%). Only one of the five controlled clinical studies was prospective and randomized. The advantages of PEI weighed against its limitations and disadvantages were critically analyzed in comparison to the drill.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric surgery is an innovative and promising surgical technique in the temporal bone. PEI appears to enable safer and more precise bone removal in close proximity to soft tissue when compared to the drill. The slower bone removal and cost factors represent current limitations to its wider use in ear surgery.

Vestibular Nerve Section via Middle Cranial Fossa Approach

Vestibular nerve section (VNS) is a surgical intervention with hearing preservation used for the treatment of Menière's disease after conservative medical therapy has failed (1,2). With the recent rise in less invasive treatments such as intratympanic gentamicin, VNS has been performed less frequently (3). The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach for VNS is an uncommon approach due to its technical difficulty. However, it can provide the best distinction of internal auditory canal contents compared with retrosigmoid and retrolabyrinthine approaches. Several advancements in the MCF approach have been described, including the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring with electromyography, early removal of the temporal lobe retractor, and the use of an ultrasonic bone aspirator for internal auditory canal decompression (4-6). We demonstrate a case study with a step-by-step approach to successfully sectioning the superior and inferior vestibular nerves while utilizing these advancements and avoiding facial and cochlear nerve injury via the MCF (7). SDC video link: http://links.lww.com/MAO/B409.

3D Exoscope Navigation-Guided Approach to Middle Cranial Fossa

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility and efficacy of a 3D exoscope navigation-guided middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach to the internal auditory canal (IAC); to potentially obviate the need to use dissection landmarks and instead, use the navigation probe as a guide to find structures and drill down to the IAC.

PATIENTS

Cadaveric dissection of six temporal bones.

INTERVENTION

Computed tomography temporal bone was performed with fiducials on each specimen before the dissection to employ the navigation system. Using a 3D exoscope with navigation by Synaptive (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), the MCF approach was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Navigation accuracy, ability to identify critical structures, and ability to drill out the IAC successfully.

RESULTS

All six specimens had the IAC successfully drilled out using the 3D exoscope. All dissections were performed with navigation and did not require dissecting out the greater superficial petrosal nerve and superior semicircular canal. One specimen used landmark dissection to confirm the IAC after navigation had been used to locate the IAC first. Navigation accuracy mean was 1.86 mm (range, 1.56-2.05 mm).

CONCLUSION

A 3D exoscope navigation-guided MCF approach to the IAC is feasible without landmark dissection.