Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Are Related to Microparticle-Induced Coagulation

Encouraging Regular Aortic Valve Opening for EVAHEART 2 LVAD Support Using Virtual Patient Hemodynamic Speed Modulation Analysis

This study focuses on investigating the EVAHEART 2 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) toward designing optimal pump speed modulation (PSM) algorithms for encouraging aortic valve (AV) flow. A custom-designed virtual patient hemodynamic model incorporating the EVAHEART 2 pressure-flow curves, cardiac chambers, and the systemic and pulmonary circulations was developed and used in this study. Several PSM waveforms were tested to evaluate their influence on the mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and AV flow for representative heart failure patients. Baseline speeds were varied from 1,600 to 2,000 rpm. For each baseline speed, the following parameters were analyzed: 1) PSM ratio (reduced speed/baseline speed), 2) PSM duration (3-7 seconds), 3) native ventricle contractility, and 4) patient MAP of 70 and 80 mm Hg. More than 2,000 rpm virtual patient scenarios were explored. A lower baseline speed (1,600 and 1,700 rpm) produced more opportunities for AV opening and more AV flow. Higher baseline speeds (1,800 and 2,000 rpm) had lower or nonexistent AV flow. When analyzing PSM ratios, a larger reduction in speed (25%) over a longer PSM (5+ seconds) duration produced the most AV flow. Lower patient MAP and increased native ventricle contractility also contributed to improving AV opening frequency and flow. This study of the EVAHEART 2 LVAD is the first to focus on leveraging PSM to enhance pulsatility and encourage AV flow. Increased AV opening frequency can benefit aortic root hemodynamics, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Coagulation and Transfusion Updates From 2021

2021 and the COVID 19 pandemic have brought unprecedented blood shortages worldwide. These deficits have propelled national efforts to reduce blood usage, including limiting elective services and accelerating Patient Blood Management (PBM) initiatives. A host of research dedicated to blood usage and management within cardiac surgery has continued to emerge. The intent of this review is to highlight this past year's research pertaining to PBM and COVID-19-related coagulation changes.

Hemostasis Disturbances in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (CF-LVAD) Patients—Rationale and Study Design

Left ventricular assist devices are a treatment option for end-stage heart failure patients. Despite advancing technologies, bleeding and thromboembolic events strongly decrease the survival and the quality of life of these patients. Little is known about prognostic factors determining these adverse events in this group of patients. Therefore, we plan to investigate 90 consecutive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients and study in vitro fibrin clot properties (clot lysis time, clot permeability, fibrin ultrastructure using a scanning electron microscope) and the calibrated automated thrombogram in addition to the von Willebrand factor antigen, fibrinogen, D-dimer, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to identify prognostic factors of adverse outcomes during the course of therapy. We plan to assess the hemostasis system at four different time points, i.e., before LVAD implantation, 3–4 months after LVAD implantation, 6–12 months after LVAD implantation, and at the end of the study (at 5 years or at the time of the adverse event). Adverse outcomes were defined as bleeding events (bleeding in general or in the following subtypes: severe bleeding, fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding), thromboembolic events (stroke or transient ischemic attack, pump thrombosis, including thrombosis within the pump or its inflow or outflow conduits, arterial peripheral thromboembolism), and death.

Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit

BACKGROUND

Hemocompatibility of left ventricular assist devices is essential for preventing adverse events. In this study, we compared the hemocompatibility of an axial-flow (Sputnik) to a centrifugal-flow (HeartMate 3) pump.

METHODS

Both pumps were integrated into identical in vitro test circuits, each filled with 75 mL heparinized human blood of the same donor. During each experiment (n = 7), the pumps were operated with equal flow for six hours. Blood sampling and analysis were performed on a regular schedule. The analytes were indicators of hemolysis, coagulation activation, platelet count and activation, as well as extracellular vesicles.

RESULTS

Sputnik induced higher hemolysis compared to the HeartMate 3 after 360 min. Furthermore, platelet activation was higher for Sputnik after 120 min onward. In the HeartMate 3 circuit, the platelet count was reduced within the first hour. Furthermore, Sputnik triggered a more pronounced increase in extracellular vesicles, a potential trigger for adverse events in left ventricular assist device application. Activation of coagulation showed a time-dependent increase, with no differences between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This experimental study confirms the hypothesis that axial-flow pumps may induce stronger hemolysis compared to centrifugal pumps, coming along with larger amounts of circulating extracellular vesicles and a stronger PLT activation.