Dosing and monitoring of enoxaparin therapy in children: experience in a tertiary care hospital

Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Thromboprophylaxis in Pediatric Neurosurgery and Spinal Injury: Current Trends and Literature Review

Although the entities of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, and thromboprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing brain tumor and spine surgery, traumatic brain injury and elective neurosurgical procedures are widely elucidated, the same is not valid when pediatric patients are under consideration. An attempt to review the peculiarities of these patients through a comprehensive bibliographic review is undertaken. We performed a narrative summary of the relevant literature dedicated to pediatric patients, centered on traumatic brain injury, the general incidence of thromboembolic disease in this patient population, the role of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE, and its role in elective neurosurgical procedures, including spinal operations. Additionally, the risk of deep venous thrombosis in elective neurosurgical procedures is reviewed. Due to inherent limitations of the current studies, particularly a restricted number of patients, our data are underpowered to give a definitive protocol and guidelines for all the affected patients. Our current conclusions, based only on pediatric patients, argue that there is limited risk of VTE in pediatric patients suffering from brain tumors and that the possibility of VTE is very low in children undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. There is no consensus regarding the exact incidence of VTE in traumatic brain injury patients. LMWH seems to be a safe and effective choice for the "at risk" pediatric patient population defined as being older than 15 years, venous catheterization, nonaccidental trauma, increased length of hospital stays, orthopaedic (including spinal) surgery, and cranial surgery.

Evaluation of a Pediatric Enoxaparin Dosing Protocol and the Impact on Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Enoxaparin has been studied for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolism in the pediatric population. Dose-finding studies have suggested higher mean maintenance dose requirements in younger children; however, the current recommended dosing schema endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians remains conservative, likely secondary to limited data on the safety and efficacy of escalated starting doses. Primary objectives of this study included the identification of patient characteristics and risk factors with associations to anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) values. The secondary objective was to determine an association between the initial anti-Xa value and thrombus resolution. Safety outcomes related to bleeding were also assessed.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed records of all pediatric patients ≤18 years of age who were initiated on therapeutic subcutaneous enoxaparin between October 1, 2008, and October 1, 2018, at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota for an indication of incident thrombus (N = 283).

RESULTS

Successful resolution of thrombus was directly associated with attaining a therapeutic anti-Xa concentration upon first laboratory evaluation. Other characteristics with associations to initial anti-Xa values included age, body mass index, and certain diagnoses. The rate of composite bleeding was consistent across concentrations of anti-Xa (p = 0.4944).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite adherence to protocol, the current enoxaparin dosing nomogram is only successful at achieving a therapeutic anti-Xa concentration (0.5-1.0 unit/mL) 55.8% of the time. A more aggressive enoxaparin dosing nomogram is warranted, as delaying time to therapeutic anti-Xa values impacts clinical outcomes, specifically thrombus resolution. Further investigation into characteristics with association to anti-Xa concentrations is needed.

Retrospective comparison of two enoxaparin dosing and monitoring protocols at a pediatric hospital

PURPOSE

The study analyzes the effectiveness and safety of a higher than standard enoxaparin dosing protocol implemented for pediatric patients requiring initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2 enoxaparin dosing and monitoring protocols was performed. The standard protocol used 1.5 mg/kg/dose (in patients <3 months of age) and 1 mg/kg/dose (in patients ≥3 months of age) with anti-Xa monitoring following the first dose. The high-dose protocol was implemented at 1.7 mg/kg/dose (in patients <3 months of age), 1.5 mg/kg/dose (in patients 3 through 11 months of age), 1.2 mg/kg/dose (in patients 1 through 4 years of age), and 1.1 mg/kg/dose (in patients 5 through 17 years of age), with anti-Xa monitoring after the second dose. Primary outcomes were number of dosing changes prior to and time to first target anti-Xa level. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients with anti-Xa levels above target level.

RESULTS

The median number of dose changes required to achieve a target anti-Xa level was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-1.5) and 0 (IQR, 0-1) for the standard-dose (n = 87) and high-dose groups (n = 132) (p = 0.17), respectively. The median number of dose adjustments to achieve target anti-Xa levels in the 3 through 11 months of age subgroup declined from 2 (IQR, 1-3.25) to 0 (IQR, 0-1) in the standard- versus high-dose groups, respectively (p < 0.01). No difference was seen in other age subgroups. Patients with above-target levels did not differ statistically between groups.

CONCLUSION

Initiating enoxaparin at higher doses in pediatric patients may result in fewer dosing changes than standard dosing. Benefit was demonstrated for the 3-11 months of age high-dose subgroup. Across all groups, the high-dose strategy was safe and did not result in a statistically significant increase in above-target levels.

A Critical Evaluation of Enoxaparin Dose Adjustment Guidelines in Children

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study are to perform a large-scale evaluation of the standardized dosage adjustment nomogram recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) for the management of enoxaparin in hospitalized pediatric patients and to determine the necessity of routine and repeated anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was designed, and charts were reviewed in a single tertiary care institution for all patients who received enoxaparin between October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2016. Patients were included if they were receiving treatment doses of enoxaparin according to the pediatric CHEST guidelines, had a subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic anti-Xa level drawn at 3.5 to 6 hours after a dose, had a dose changed in an attempt to attain a therapeutic anti-Xa level, and had a second anti-Xa level drawn 3.5 to 6 hours after the dose change. Descriptive statistical methods were used to characterize the ability of dose adjustment via a nomogram to attain an anti-Xa of 0.5 to 1 unit/mL.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients were identified who received the appropriate initial dose and dosage adjustment and whose levels were drawn according to the CHEST guidelines. In patients who had an initial anti-Xa level of <0.35 units/mL and received the nomogram recommended dose increase of 25% ± 5%, 28 out of 96 patients (29.2%) reached therapeutic levels. Of 197 patients who had an initial anti-Xa level between 0.35 and 0.49 units/mL and who received the nomogram recommended dose increase of 10% ± 5%, 116 (58.9%) reached therapeutic levels. Of 50 patients with an initial anti-Xa level between 1.1 and 1.5 units/mL and who received the nomogram dose decrease of 20% ± 5%, 31 (62%) reached therapeutic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The current dosage adjustment nomogram recommended by the CHEST guidelines does not reliably lead to therapeutic anti-Xa levels when used to adjust enoxaparin doses in pediatric patients.

Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children

Venous thrombosis (VTE) in children and neonates presents numerous management challenges. Although increasing in frequency, VTE in children and neonates is still uncommon compared with adults. The epidemiology of VTE is vastly different in neonates vs children vs adolescents vs adults. In reality, pediatric thrombosis should be viewed as a multitude of rare diseases (eg, renal vein thrombosis, spontaneous thrombosis, catheter-related thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis), all requiring different approaches to diagnosis and with different short- and long-term consequences, but linked by the use of common therapeutic agents. Further, children have fundamentally different physiology in terms of blood flow, developmental hemostasis, and, likely, endothelial function. The American Society of Hematology 2017 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Pediatric VTE provides up-to-date evidence-based guidelines related to treatment. Therefore, this article will focus on the practical use of therapeutic agents in the management of pediatric VTE, especially unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and oral vitamin K antagonists, as the most common anticoagulants used in children. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain in clinical trials in children and should not be used outside of formal trials for the foreseeable future.

Establishment of prophylactic enoxaparin dosing recommendations to achieve targeted anti-factor Xa concentrations in children with CHD

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin may be used to prevent central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with CHD. We aimed to determine whether current enoxaparin dosing regimens effectively achieve anti-factor Xa concentrations within prophylactic goal ranges in this patient population.

METHODS

We implemented a formal protocol aimed at reducing central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children with CHD in January, 2016. Standard empiric prophylactic enoxaparin dosing regimens were used - for example, 0.75 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for patients <2 months of age and 0.5 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for patients ⩾2 months of age - with anti-factor Xa goal range of 0.25-0.49 IU/ml. Patients <2 years of age who received enoxaparin and had at least one valid steady-state anti-factor Xa measurement between 25 January, 2016 and 31 August, 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 47 patients had 186 anti-factor Xa concentrations measured, of which 20 (11%) were above and 112 (60%) were below the prophylactic goal range. Anti-factor Xa concentrations within the goal range were ultimately achieved in 31 patients. Median dose required to achieve anti-factor Xa concentrations within the prophylactic range was 0.89 mg/kg/dose (25, 75%: 0.75, 1.11) for patients <2 months (n=23 patients) and 0.79 mg/kg/dose (25, 75%: 0.62, 1.11) for patients ⩾2 months (n=8 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin doses required to achieve prophylactic anti-factor Xa concentrations in young children with CHD were consistently higher than the currently recommended prophylactic dosing regimens. Further study is needed to determine whether dose titration to achieve prophylactic anti-factor Xa concentrations is effective in preventing central venous catheter-related thrombosis.

Design and rationale for the DIVERSITY study: An open-label, randomized study of dabigatran etexilate for pediatric venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by LMWH or vitamin K antagonists, all of which have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety for adult VTE and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the current SOC. Pediatric trials are needed to establish dosing in children and to confirm that results obtained in adults are applicable in the pediatric setting.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the design and rationale of a planned phase IIb/III trial that will evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for DE and assess the safety and efficacy of DE versus SOC for pediatric VTE treatment.

PATIENTS/METHODS

An open-label, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority study will be conducted in approximately 180 patients aged 0 to <18 years with VTE, who have received initial UFH or LMWH treatment and who are expected to require ≥3 months of anticoagulation therapy. Patients will receive DE or SOC for 3 months. DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets, or an oral liquid formulation according to patient age. Initial doses will be calculated using a proposed dosing algorithm.

RESULTS

There will be two coprimary endpoints: a composite efficacy endpoint comprising the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE and VTE-related mortality, and a safety endpoint: freedom from major bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Findings will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy and safety of DE for the treatment of pediatric VTE. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01895777.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues

This review is aimed at describing the unique challenges of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment in children, and highlighting areas for research for improving clinical outcomes of children with thromboembolic disease. The evidence presented demonstrates the challenges of advancing the evidence base informing optimal management of thromboembolic disease in children. Recent observational studies have identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children, but there are few interventional studies assessing the benefit-risk balance of using thromboprophylaxis in risk-stratified clinical subgroups. A risk level-based framework is proposed for administering mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. More research is required to refine the assignment of risk levels. The anticoagulants currently used predominantly in children are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists. There is a paucity of robust evidence on the age-specific pharmacology of these agents, and their efficacy and safety for prevention and treatment of thrombosis in children. The available literature is heterogeneous, reflecting age-specific differences, and the various clinical settings for anticoagulation in children. Monitoring assays and target ranges are not well established. Nevertheless, weight-based dosing appears to achieve acceptable outcomes in most indications. Given the limitations of the classical anticoagulants for children, there is great interest in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whose properties appear to be particularly suitable for children. All DOACs currently approved for adults have Pediatric Investigation Plans ongoing or planned. These are generating age-specific formulations and systematic dosing information. The ongoing pediatric studies still have to establish whether DOACs have a positive benefit-risk balance in the various pediatric indications and age groups.

Treatment and follow-up of venous thrombosis in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The critically ill, premature patients of neonatal intensive care units are susceptible to venous thrombosis, an adverse event associated with short- and long-term morbidity. Venous thrombosis is frequently treated with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) such as enoxaparin, but optimal dosing of LMWH must balance the morbidity of venous thrombosis with the potential adverse affects of anticoagulation. The optimal dosing of enoxaparin for premature infants is unclear. The objective of this study was to describe enoxaparin therapy and follow-up in critically ill neonates diagnosed with venous thrombosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in a single tertiary care institution. Infants with venous thrombosis diagnosed in the NICU were identified using preexisting quality improvement lists and medical records.

RESULTS

Twenty-six infants with 30 venous thromboses were identified with a median gestational age of 31 weeks at birth. Eighteen (69%) infants received enoxaparin for venous thrombosis during their hospitalization, beginning with a median dose of 1.5 mg kg^-1 every 12 h. This dose was increased to a median of 2.1 mg kg^-1 every 12 h to achieve target anti-factor Xa levels. The target dose was significantly higher in patients with a postmenstrual age of <37 weeks. Enoxaparin treatment was documented after discharge in 12 patients, continuing for a median of 99 days. Four patients died during hospitalization and their deaths were not attributable to venous thrombosis or anticoagulation complication. Follow-up documentation between 6 and 24 months after venous thrombosis diagnosis revealed no major morbidity of venous thrombosis or enoxaparin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data reinforce the relative safety and necessity of enoxaparin doses above 1.5 mg kg^-1 per 12 h in most neonates. This was particularly true for infants at lower postmenstrual age.

Stability and Sterility of Enoxaparin 8 mg/mL Subcutaneous Injectable Solution

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin is often diluted to accurately deliver doses to neonatal and infant patients. Current recommendations for dilutions may not be adequate for the smallest patients. METHODS: Review of dosing at our institution occurred, and an 8 mg/mL concentration of enoxaparin was chosen. A concentration of 8 mg/mL was compounded by diluting 0.4 mL of enoxaparin (100 mg/mL) into 4.6 mL of sterile water for injection into an empty sterile vial. Four syringes of the 8 mg/mL concentration were prepared by 5 technicians (20 total syringes). Stability and sterility testing occurred a 0, 7, 14, and 30 days. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to detect significant differences in Anti-Factor Xa concentrations at the testing time points. RESULTS: The dilution of enoxaparin was sterile at 30 days but exhibited significant degradation at the 30-day point (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A dilution of enoxaparin 8 mg/mL is stable and sterile for 14 days refrigerated but is not stable at 30 days.

The safety and efficacy of use of low-molecular-weight heparin in pediatric neurosurgical patients

OBJECT

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), mainly enoxaparin, offer several advantages over standard anticoagulation therapies such as unfractionated heparin and warfarin, including predictable pharmacokinetics, minimal monitoring, and subcutaneous administration. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of LMWHs in pediatric neurosurgical patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with patients 18 years old or younger who were admitted to the Pediatric Neurosurgery Service at Texas Children's Hospital and treated with LMWH for either therapeutic or prophylactic purposes between March 1, 2011, and December 30, 2013. Demographic and clinical features and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

LMWH was administered for treatment of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in 17 children and for prophylaxis in 24 children. Clinical resolution of VTEs occurred in 100% (17 of 17) of patients receiving therapeutic doses of LMWH. No patient receiving prophylactic doses of LMWH developed a new VTE. Major or minor bleeding complications occurred in 18% (3 of 17 children) and 4% (1 of 24 children) of those receiving therapeutic and prophylactic doses, respectively. All 4 patients who experienced hemorrhagic complications had other bleeding risk factors-i.e., coagulopathies and antiplatelet medications.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH seems to be safe and efficacious for both management and prophylaxis of VTEs in pediatric neurosurgery. However, pediatric practitioners should be aware of higher risk for bleeding complications with increasing doses of LMWH, especially in patients with preexisting bleeding disorders or concurrent use of antiplatelet agents.

A retrospective analysis of outcomes of dalteparin use in pediatric patients: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Dalteparin is a commonly used low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with extensive safety data in adults. With distinct advantages of once daily dosing and relative safety in renal impairment, it has been used off-label in pediatric practice; however, age-based dosing guidelines, safety and efficacy data in children are evolving.

OBJECTIVES

To report our institutional experience with the use of dalteparin in the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all children (0-18years) that received dalteparin from December 1, 2000 through December 31, 2011. Doses per unit body weight per day (units/kg/day) were calculated for age-based group comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 166 patients identified, 116 (70%) received prophylactic doses while 50 (30%) received therapeutic doses of dalteparin. Infants (<1year) required significantly higher weight-based dosing to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels compared to children (1-10years) or adolescents (>10-18years) (mean dose units/kg/day; 396.6 versus 236.7 and 178.8 respectively, p<0.0001). Overall response rate, including complete and partial thrombus resolution, was 83%. Bleeding complications were minor and the rates were similar in therapeutic and prophylaxis patients. No significant differences in dosing or bleeding events were noted based on obesity or malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, dalteparin is effective for prophylaxis and therapy of VTE in pediatric patients. Dosing should be customized in an age-based manner with close monitoring of anti-Xa activity in order to achieve optimal levels, prevent bleeding complications, and to allow full benefit of prevention or therapy of thrombotic complications.

Venous thromboembolism in critically ill children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current literature on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill children.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increasing concern for VTE and its complications in critically ill children. Critically ill children are at increased risk of thromboembolism because of the treatment that they are receiving and their underlying condition. A complex relationship exists between thrombosis and infection. A thrombus is a nidus for infection, while infection increases the risk of thrombosis. Pediatric-specific guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism are lacking. Current guidelines are based on the data from adults. Novel anticoagulants are now available for use in adults. Studies are ongoing to determine their safety in children. Risk assessment tools have recently been developed to determine the risk of thromboembolism in critically ill children. Certain molecules are associated with thromboembolism in adults.

SUMMARY

Pediatric critical care practitioners should be cognizant of the importance of VTE in critically ill children to allow early identification and treatment. Adequately powered clinical trials are critically needed to generate evidence that will guide the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism in critically ill children. Risk assessment tools that incorporate biomarkers may improve our ability to predict the occurrence of thromboembolism in critically ill children.

Antithrombotic therapies: anticoagulation and thrombolysis

Pediatric deep vein thrombosis is an increasingly recognized phenomenon, especially with advances in treatment and supportive care of critically ill children and with better diagnostic capabilities. High-quality evidence and uniform management guidelines for antithrombotic treatment, particularly thrombolytic therapy, remain limited. Optimal dosing, intensity and duration strategies for anticoagulation as well as thrombolytic regimens that maximize efficacy and safety need to be determined through well-designed clinical trials using use of a risk-stratified approach.