1
|
Henry B, Merz M, Hoang H, Abdulkarim G, Wosik J, Schoettker P. Cuffless Blood Pressure in clinical practice: challenges, opportunities and current limits. Blood Press 2024; 33:2304190. [PMID: 38245864 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2304190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Background: Cuffless blood pressure measurement technologies have attracted significant attention for their potential to transform cardiovascular monitoring.Methods: This updated narrative review thoroughly examines the challenges, opportunities, and limitations associated with the implementation of cuffless blood pressure monitoring systems.Results: Diverse technologies, including photoplethysmography, tonometry, and ECG analysis, enable cuffless blood pressure measurement and are integrated into devices like smartphones and smartwatches. Signal processing emerges as a critical aspect, dictating the accuracy and reliability of readings. Despite its potential, the integration of cuffless technologies into clinical practice faces obstacles, including the need to address concerns related to accuracy, calibration, and standardization across diverse devices and patient populations. The development of robust algorithms to mitigate artifacts and environmental disturbances is essential for extracting clear physiological signals. Based on extensive research, this review emphasizes the necessity for standardized protocols, validation studies, and regulatory frameworks to ensure the reliability and safety of cuffless blood pressure monitoring devices and their implementation in mainstream medical practice. Interdisciplinary collaborations between engineers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are crucial to address technical, clinical, and regulatory complexities during implementation. In conclusion, while cuffless blood pressure monitoring holds immense potential to transform cardiovascular care. The resolution of existing challenges and the establishment of rigorous standards are imperative for its seamless incorporation into routine clinical practice.Conclusion: The emergence of these new technologies shifts the paradigm of cardiovascular health management, presenting a new possibility for non-invasive continuous and dynamic monitoring. The concept of cuffless blood pressure measurement is viable and more finely tuned devices are expected to enter the market, which could redefine our understanding of blood pressure and hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Henry
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maxime Merz
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Harry Hoang
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ghaith Abdulkarim
- Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jedrek Wosik
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Patrick Schoettker
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kario K, Williams B, Tomitani N, McManus RJ, Schutte AE, Avolio A, Shimbo D, Wang JG, Khan NA, Picone DS, Tan I, Charlton PH, Satoh M, Mmopi KN, Lopez-Lopez JP, Bothe TL, Bianchini E, Bhandari B, Lopez-Rivera J, Charchar FJ, Tomaszewski M, Stergiou G. Innovations in blood pressure measurement and reporting technology: International Society of Hypertension position paper endorsed by the World Hypertension League, European Society of Hypertension, Asian Pacific Society of Hypertension, and Latin American Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2024:00004872-990000000-00518. [PMID: 39246139 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) is a key contributor to the lifetime risk of preclinical organ damage and cardiovascular disease. Traditional clinic-based BP readings are typically measured infrequently and under standardized/resting conditions and therefore do not capture BP values during normal everyday activity. Therefore, current hypertension guidelines emphasize the importance of incorporating out-of-office BP measurement into strategies for hypertension diagnosis and management. However, conventional home and ambulatory BP monitoring devices use the upper-arm cuff oscillometric method and only provide intermittent BP readings under static conditions or in a limited number of situations. New innovations include technologies for BP estimation based on processing of sensor signals supported by artificial intelligence tools, technologies for remote monitoring, reporting and storage of BP data, and technologies for BP data interpretation and patient interaction designed to improve hypertension management ("digital therapeutics"). The number and volume of data relating to new devices/technologies is increasing rapidly and will continue to grow. This International Society of Hypertension position paper describes the new devices/technologies, presents evidence relating to new BP measurement techniques and related indices, highlights standard for the validation of new devices/technologies, discusses the reliability and utility of novel BP monitoring devices, the association of these metrics with clinical outcomes, and the use of digital therapeutics. It also highlights the challenges and evidence gaps that need to be overcome before these new technologies can be considered as a user-friendly and accurate source of novel BP data to inform clinical hypertension management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuomi Kario
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Bryan Williams
- University College London (UCL) and National Insitute for Health Research UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naoko Tomitani
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aletta E Schutte
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alberto Avolio
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daichi Shimbo
- Hypertension Lab, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ji-Guang Wang
- Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Nadia A Khan
- Center for Advancing Health Outcomes, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dean S Picone
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Isabella Tan
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter H Charlton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michihiro Satoh
- Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keneilwe Nkgola Mmopi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine. University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Jose P Lopez-Lopez
- Masira Research Institute, Medical School, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Tomas L Bothe
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Physiology, Center for Space Medicine and Extreme Environments Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Bianchini
- Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
| | - Buna Bhandari
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jesús Lopez-Rivera
- Unidad de Hipertension arterial, V departamento, Hospital Central San Cristobal, Tachira, Venezuela
| | - Fadi J Charchar
- Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University Australia, Ballarat
- Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Maciej Tomaszewski
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester
- Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George Stergiou
- Hypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delmotte L, Desebbe O, Alexander B, Kouz K, Coeckelenbergh S, Schoettker P, Turgay T, Joosten A. Smartphone-Based versus Non-Invasive Automatic Oscillometric Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements: A Prospective Method Comparison Volunteer Study. J Pers Med 2023; 14:15. [PMID: 38276230 PMCID: PMC10817276 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Mobile health diagnostics have demonstrated effectiveness in detecting and managing chronic diseases. This method comparison study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of the previously evaluated OptiBP™ technology over a four-week study period. This device uses optical signals recorded by placing a patient's fingertip on a smartphone's camera to estimate blood pressure (BP). Methods: In adult participants without cardiac arrhythmias and minimal interarm blood pressure difference (systolic arterial pressure (SAP) < 15 mmHg or diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) < 10 mmHg), three pairs of 30 s BP measurements with the OptiBP™ (test method) were simultaneously compared using three pairs of measurements with the non-invasive oscillometric brachial cuff (reference method) on the opposite arm over a period of four consecutive weeks at a rate of two measurements per week (one in the morning and one in the afternoon). The agreement of BP values between the two technologies was analyzed using Bland-Altman and error grid analyses. The performance of the smartphone application was investigated using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definitions, which require the bias ± standard deviation (SD) between two technologies to be lower than 5 ± 8 mmHg. Results: Among the 65 eligible volunteers, 53 participants had adequate OptiBP™ BP values. In 12 patients, no OptiBP™ BP could be measured due to inadequate signals. Only nine participants had known chronic arterial hypertension and 76% of those patients were treated. The mean bias ± SD between both technologies was -1.4 mmHg ± 10.1 mmHg for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), 0.2 mmHg ± 6.5 mmHg for diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and -0.5 mmHg ± 6.9 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP). Error grid analyses indicated that 100% of the pairs of BP measurements were located in zones A (no risk) and B (low risk). Conclusions: In a cohort of volunteers, we observed an acceptable agreement between BP values obtained with the OptiBPTM and those obtained with the reference method over a four-week period. The OptiBPTM fulfills the ISO standards for MAP and DAP (but not SAP). The error grid analyses showed that 100% measurements were located in risk zones A and B. Despite the need for some technological improvements, this application may become an important tool to measure BP in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lila Delmotte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (L.D.); (T.T.)
| | - Olivier Desebbe
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Sauvegarde Clinic, Ramsay Santé, 69009 Lyon, France;
| | - Brenton Alexander
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92103, USA;
| | - Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sean Coeckelenbergh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), 94800 Villejuif, France
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Patrick Schoettker
- Biospectal SA, 1003 Lausanne, Switzerland;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tuna Turgay
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (L.D.); (T.T.)
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tamrat T, Setiyawati YD, Barreix M, Gayatri M, Rinjani SO, Pasaribu MP, Geissbuhler A, Shankar AH, Tunçalp Ö. Exploring perceptions and operational considerations for use of a smartphone application to self-monitor blood pressure in pregnancy in Lombok, Indonesia: protocol for a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073875. [PMID: 38110387 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal deaths globally and require close monitoring of blood pressure (BP) to mitigate potential adverse effects. Despite the recognised need for research on self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) among pregnant populations, there are very few studies focused on low and middle income contexts, which carry the greatest burden of HDPs. The study aims to understand the perceptions, barriers, and operational considerations for using a smartphone software application to perform SMBP by pregnant women in Lombok, Indonesia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study includes a combination of focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and workshop observations. Pregnant women will also be provided with a research version of the smartphone BP application to use in their home and subsequently provide feedback on their experiences. The study will include pregnant women with current or past HDP, their partners and the healthcare workers involved in the provision of antenatal care services within the catchment area of six primary healthcare centres. Data obtained from the interviews and observations will undergo thematic analyses using a combination of both inductive and deductive approaches. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Human Reproduction Programme (HRP) Research Project Review Panel and WHO Ethical Review Committee (A65932) as well as the Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Mataram in Indonesia (004/UN18/F7/ETIK/2023).Findings will be disseminated through research publications and communicated to the Lombok district health offices. The analyses from this study will also inform the design of a subsequent impact evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tigest Tamrat
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maria Barreix
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mergy Gayatri
- Summit Institute for Development, Mataram, Indonesia
- Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
| | | | | | | | - Anuraj H Shankar
- Summit Institute for Development, Mataram, Indonesia
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wienhold J, Kemper I, Czaplik M, Follmann A, Rossaint R, Derwall M. [Teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and informed consent-Are we ready for a paradigm shift?]. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2023; 72:697-702. [PMID: 37563314 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-023-01319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
In Germany, approximately 17 million anaesthesiological procedures and, consequently, roughly the same number of preoperative consultations are conducted each year. So far, these have predominantly taken place in person. However, recent developments in technology, medical-legal aspects, and politics, combined with the catalyzing effect of the pandemic situation, have led to a significant boost in telemedicine. In the field of anaesthesia, there are new approaches to implementing telemedicine in the pre- and postoperative setting. This article focuses on the preoperative setting and presents general requirements for a teleconsultation as preoperative evaluation, the current state of technology, and medical-legal aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Wienhold
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
| | - Ilka Kemper
- Geschäftsbereich Recht, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Michael Czaplik
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Follmann
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Rolf Rossaint
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Derwall
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Johannesstraße 9-17, 44137, Dortmund, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoon YH, Kim J, Lee KJ, Cho D, Oh JK, Kim M, Roh JH, Park HW, Lee JH. Blood Pressure Measurement Based on the Camera and Inertial Measurement Unit of a Smartphone: Instrument Validation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11:e44147. [PMID: 37694382 PMCID: PMC10503482 DOI: 10.2196/44147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Even though several mobile apps that can measure blood pressure have been developed, the data about the accuracy of these apps are limited. Objective We assessed the accuracy of AlwaysBP (test) in blood pressure measurement compared with the standard, cuff-based, manual method of brachial blood pressure measurement (reference). Methods AlwaysBP is a smartphone software that estimates systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) based on pulse transit time (PTT). PTT was calculated with a finger photoplethysmogram and seismocardiogram using, respectively, the camera and inertial measurement unit sensor of a commercially available smartphone. After calculating PTT, SBP and DBP were estimated via the Bramwell-Hill and Moens-Korteweg equations. A calibration process was carried out 3 times for each participant to determine the input parameters of the equations. This study was conducted from March to August 2021 at Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital with 87 participants aged between 19 and 70 years who met specific conditions. The primary analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the test method compared with the reference method for the entire study population. The secondary analysis was performed to confirm the stability of the test method for up to 4 weeks in 15 participants. At enrollment, gender, arm circumference, and blood pressure distribution were considered according to current guidelines. Results Among the 87 study participants, 45 (52%) individuals were male, and the average age was 35.6 (SD 10.4) years. Hypertension was diagnosed in 14 (16%) participants before this study. The mean test and reference SBPs were 120.0 (SD 18.8) and 118.7 (SD 20.2) mm Hg, respectively (difference: mean 1.2, SD 7.1 mm Hg). The absolute differences between the test and reference SBPs were <5, <10, and <15 mm Hg in 57.5% (150/261), 84.3% (220/261 ), and 94.6% (247/261) of measurements. The mean test and reference DBPs were 80.1 (SD 12.6) and 81.1 (SD 14.4) mm Hg, respectively (difference: mean -1.0, SD 6.0 mm Hg). The absolute differences between the test and reference DBPs were <5, <10, and <15 mm Hg in 75.5% (197/261), 93.9% (245/261), and 97.3% (254/261) of measurements, respectively. The secondary analysis showed that after 4 weeks, the differences between SBP and DBP were 0.1 (SD 8.8) and -2.4 (SD 7.6) mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions AlwaysBP exhibited acceptable accuracy in SBP and DBP measurement compared with the standard measurement method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization protocol criteria. However, further validation studies with a specific validation protocol designed for cuffless blood pressure measuring devices are required to assess clinical accuracy. This technology can be easily applied in everyday life and may improve the general population's awareness of hypertension, thus helping to control it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Hoon Yoon
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongin Kim
- Deepmedi Research Institute of Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Jin Lee
- Deepmedi Research Institute of Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongrae Cho
- Deepmedi Research Institute of Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Kyung Oh
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Minsu Kim
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Hyung Roh
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Woong Park
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Hwan Lee
- Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sheikh AB, Sobotka PA, Garg I, Dunn JP, Minhas AMK, Shandhi MMH, Molinger J, McDonnell BJ, Fudim M. Blood Pressure Variability in Clinical Practice: Past, Present and the Future. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e029297. [PMID: 37119077 PMCID: PMC10227216 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.029297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in wearable technology through convenient and cuffless systems will enable continuous, noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and heart rhythm on both longitudinal 24-hour measurement scales and high-frequency beat-to-beat BP variability and synchronous heart rate variability and changes in underlying heart rhythm. Clinically, BP variability is classified into 4 main types on the basis of the duration of monitoring time: very-short-term (beat to beat), short-term (within 24 hours), medium-term (within days), and long-term (over months and years). BP variability is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, cognitive decline, and mental illness. The diagnostic and therapeutic value of measuring and controlling BP variability may offer critical targets in addition to lowering mean BP in hypertensive populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abu Baker Sheikh
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNMUSA
| | - Paul A. Sobotka
- Division of CardiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Ishan Garg
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNMUSA
| | - Jessilyn P. Dunn
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
- Department of Biostatistics & BioinformaticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | | | | | | | - Barry J. McDonnell
- Department of Biomedical ResearchCardiff Metropolitan UniversitySchool of Sport and Health SciencesCardiffUnited Kingdom
| | - Marat Fudim
- Division of CardiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Duke Clinical Research InstituteDurhamNCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Festo C, Vannevel V, Ali H, Tamrat T, Mollel GJ, Hlongwane T, Fahmida KA, Alland K, Barreix M, Mehrtash H, Silva R, Thwin SS, Mehl G, Labrique AB, Masanja H, Tunçalp Ӧ. Accuracy of a smartphone application for blood pressure estimation in Bangladesh, South Africa, and Tanzania. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:69. [PMID: 37069209 PMCID: PMC10107587 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00804-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Undetected and unmonitored hypertension carries substantial mortality and morbidity, especially during pregnancy. We assessed the accuracy of OptiBPTM, a smartphone application for estimating blood pressure (BP), across diverse settings. The study was conducted in community settings: Gaibandha, Bangladesh and Ifakara, Tanzania for general populations, and Kalafong Provincial Tertiary Hospital, South Africa for pregnant populations. Based on guidance from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81,060-2:2018 for non-invasive BP devices and global consensus statement, we compared BP measurements taken by two independent trained nurses on a standard auscultatory cuff to the BP measurements taken by a research version of OptiBPTM called CamBP. For ISO criterion 1, the mean error was 0.5 ± 5.8 mm Hg for the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 0.1 ± 3.9 mmHg for the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in South Africa; 0.8 ± 7.0 mmHg for the SBP and -0.4 ± 4.0 mmHg for the DBP in Tanzania; 3.3 ± 7.4 mmHg for the SBP and -0.4 ± 4.3 mmHg for the DBP in Bangladesh. For ISO criterion 2, the average standard deviation of the mean error per subject was 4.9 mmHg for the SBP and 3.4 mmHg for the DBP in South Africa; 6.3 mmHg for the SBP and 3.6 mmHg for the DBP in Tanzania; 6.4 mmHg for the SBP and 3.8 mmHg for the DBP in Bangladesh. OptiBPTM demonstrated accuracy against ISO standards in study populations, including pregnant populations, except in Bangladesh for SBP (criterion 2). Further research is needed to improve performance across different populations and integration within health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Festo
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Valerie Vannevel
- South African Medical Research Council Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
- Research Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kalafong Provincial Tertiary Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Hasmot Ali
- The JiVitA Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition Research Project, Nasirabad, Keranipara, Rangpur, 5400, Bangladesh
| | - Tigest Tamrat
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Getrud J Mollel
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Tsakane Hlongwane
- South African Medical Research Council Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
- Research Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kalafong Provincial Tertiary Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kaniz A Fahmida
- The JiVitA Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition Research Project, Nasirabad, Keranipara, Rangpur, 5400, Bangladesh
| | - Kelsey Alland
- Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - María Barreix
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hedieh Mehrtash
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ronaldo Silva
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Soe Soe Thwin
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garrett Mehl
- Department of Digital Health and Innovations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alain B Labrique
- Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Digital Health and Innovations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Honorati Masanja
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Ӧzge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang CF, Wang TY, Kuo PH, Wang HL, Li SZ, Lin CM, Chan SC, Liu TY, Lo YC, Lin SH, Chen YY. Upper-Arm Photoplethysmographic Sensor with One-Time Calibration for Long-Term Blood Pressure Monitoring. BIOSENSORS 2023; 13:321. [PMID: 36979533 PMCID: PMC10046397 DOI: 10.3390/bios13030321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Wearable cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitors have garnered widespread attention in recent years; however, the long-term performance values of these devices are questionable. Most cuffless blood pressure monitors require initial baseline calibration and regular recalibrations with a cuffed blood pressure monitor to ensure accurate blood pressure estimation, and their estimation accuracy may vary over time if left uncalibrated. Therefore, this study assessed the accuracy and long-term performance of an upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor according to the ISO 81060-2 standard. This device was based on a nonlinear machine-learning model architecture with a fine-tuning optimized method. The blood pressure measurement protocol followed a validation procedure according to the standard, with an additional four weekly blood pressure measurements over a 1-month period, to assess the long-term performance values of the upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor. The results showed that the photoplethysmographic signals obtained from the upper arm had better qualities when compared with those measured from the wrist. When compared with the cuffed blood pressure monitor, the means ± standard deviations of the difference in BP at week 1 (baseline) were -1.36 ± 7.24 and -2.11 ± 5.71 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which met the first criterion of ≤5 ± ≤8.0 mmHg and met the second criterion of a systolic blood pressure ≤ 6.89 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure ≤ 6.84 mmHg. The differences in the uncalibrated blood pressure values between the test and reference blood pressure monitors measured from week 2 to week 5 remained stable and met both criteria 1 and 2 of the ISO 81060-2 standard. The upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor in this study generated high-quality photoplethysmographic signals with satisfactory accuracy at both initial calibration and 1-month follow-ups. This device could be a convenient and practical tool to continuously measure blood pressure over long periods of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Fu Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- Biomedical Engineering Research and Development Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yun Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- Material and Chemical Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, No. 195, Sec. 4, Chunghsing Rd., Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Hsin Kuo
- Department of Neurology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu chi Medical Foundation, No. 707, Sec. 3, Zhongyang Rd., Hualien 970473, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| | - Han-Lin Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Zhang Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ming Lin
- Microlife Corporation, 9F, No. 431, Ruiguang Rd., Taipei 114063, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chieh Chan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- Microlife Corporation, 9F, No. 431, Ruiguang Rd., Taipei 114063, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Yu Liu
- Material and Chemical Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, No. 195, Sec. 4, Chunghsing Rd., Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Lo
- The Ph.D. Program in Medical Neuroscience, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Xing St., Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Huang Lin
- Department of Neurology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu chi Medical Foundation, No. 707, Sec. 3, Zhongyang Rd., Hualien 970473, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
| | - You-Yin Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- The Ph.D. Program in Medical Neuroscience, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Xing St., Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Medical Device Innovation and Translation Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hofmann G, Proença M, Degott J, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, Lemay M, Schorer R, Christen U, Knebel JF, Schoettker P. A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter. J Clin Monit Comput 2023; 37:249-259. [PMID: 35727426 PMCID: PMC9852190 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00886-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Smartphones may provide a highly available access to simplified hypertension screening in environments with limited health care resources. Most studies involving smartphone blood pressure (BP) apps have focused on validation in static conditions without taking into account intraindividual BP variations. We report here the first experimental evidence of smartphone-derived BP estimation compared to an arterial catheter in a highly dynamic context such as induction of general anesthesia. We tested a smartphone app (OptiBP) on 121 patients requiring general anesthesia and invasive BP monitoring. For each patient, ten 1-min segments aligned in time with ten smartphone recordings were extracted from the continuous invasive BP. A total of 1152 recordings from 119 patients were analyzed. After exclusion of 2 subjects and rejection of 565 recordings due to BP estimation not generated by the app, we retained 565 recordings from 109 patients (acceptance rate 51.1%). Concordance rate (CR) and angular CR demonstrated values of more than 90% for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MBP) BP. Error grid analysis showed that 98% of measurement pairs were in no- or low-risk zones for SBP and MBP, of which more than 89% in the no-risk zone. Evaluation of accuracy and precision [bias ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement)] between the app and the invasive BP was 0.0 ± 7.5 mmHg [- 14.9, 14.8], 0.1 ± 2.9 mmHg [- 5.5, 5.7], and 0.1 ± 4.2 mmHg [- 8.3, 8.4] for SBP, DBP and MBP respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a smartphone app was compared to an invasive BP reference. Its trending ability was investigated in highly dynamic conditions, demonstrating high concordance and accuracy. Our study could lead the way for mobile devices to leverage the measurement of BP and management of hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Hofmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - M Proença
- CSEM, Centre Suisse d'Électronique et de Microtechnique, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - J Degott
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Bonnier
- CSEM, Centre Suisse d'Électronique et de Microtechnique, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - A Lemkaddem
- CSEM, Centre Suisse d'Électronique et de Microtechnique, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - M Lemay
- CSEM, Centre Suisse d'Électronique et de Microtechnique, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - R Schorer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - U Christen
- Biospectal SA, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J-F Knebel
- Biospectal SA, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Schoettker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Long-term stability of over-the-counter cuffless blood pressure monitors: a proposal. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2023; 13:53-63. [PMID: 36713070 PMCID: PMC9870659 DOI: 10.1007/s12553-023-00726-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Blood pressure is an important cardiovascular parameter. Currently, the cuff-based sphygmomanometer is a popular, reliable, measurement method, but blood pressure monitors without cuffs have become popular and are now available without a prescription. Blood pressure monitors must be approved by regulatory authorities. Current cuffless blood pressure (CL-BP) monitors are not suitable for at-home management and prevention of hypertension. This paper proposes simple criteria for over-the-counter CL-BP monitoring. First, the history of the sphygmomanometer and current standard blood pressure protocol are reviewed. The main components of CL-BP monitoring are accuracy during the resting condition, accuracy during dynamic blood pressure changes, and long-term stability. In this proposal we recommend intermittent measurement to ensure that active measurement accuracy mirrors resting condition accuracy. A new experimental protocol is proposed to maintain long-term stability. A medically approved automated sphygmomanometer was used as the standard device in this study. The long-term accuracy of the test device is based on the definition of propagation error, i.e., for an oscillometric automated sphygmomanometer (5 ± 8 mmHg) ± the error for the test device static accuracy (-0.12 ± 5.49 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and - 1.17 ± 5.06 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure). Thus, the long-term stabilities were - 3.38 ± 7.1 mmHg and - 1.38 ± 5.4 mmHg, which satisfied propagation error. Further research and discussion are necessary to create standards for use by manufacturers; such standards should be readily evaluated and ensure high-quality evidence. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-023-00726-6.
Collapse
|
12
|
Validations of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices Using Recognized Protocols. J Pers Med 2022; 13:jpm13010009. [PMID: 36675670 PMCID: PMC9867184 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Preventing, diagnosing, and controlling high blood pressure is a global health priority. The self-measurement of blood pressure is therefore fundamental and should be done with devices validated by recognized protocols, although most are not. The most widely used and current protocols are the 2010 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) revision and the 2018 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)/ ESH/ the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) universal standard, respectively. The aim of this study was to find out which blood pressure measuring devices have been adequately validated by the above protocols. A narrative review of blood pressure device validations was conducted by searching the PubMed database. From 52 records identified, 37 studies were included. Most validations follow the 2010 revision and only six follow the 2018 protocol, which is more demanding. Almost all validated sphygmomanometers are automated oscillometric sphygmomanometers in the general population. Wrist devices and devices combining new technologies are also validated, as well as in specific populations, such as the obese, pregnant women, or children. There is sufficient evidence to confirm that the universal AAMI/ ESH/ISO standard is considered the protocol of the century. However, it is necessary to increase the number of validations following it and, above all, validations of the new technologies that are invading the current market.
Collapse
|
13
|
Caillat M, Degott J, Wuerzner A, Proençain M, Bonnier G, Knebel JF, Stoll C, Christen U, Durgnat V, Hofmann G, Burnier M, Wuerzner G, Schoettker P. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement across BMI categories using the OptiBP™ mobile application. Blood Press 2022; 31:288-296. [PMID: 36266938 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2132214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Obesity is a clear risk factor for hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in obese patients may be biased by cuff size and upper arm shape which may affect the accuracy of measurements. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the OptiBP smartphone application for three different body mass index (BMI) categories (normal, overweight and obese). MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants with a wide range of BP and BMI were recruited at Lausanne University Hospital's hypertension clinic in Switzerland. OptiBP estimated BP by recording an optical signal reflecting light from the participants' fingertips into a smartphone camera. Age, sex and BP distribution were collected to fulfil the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standards. Both auscultatory BP references and OptiBP BP were measured and compared using the simultaneous opposite arms method, as described in the 81060-2:2018 ISO norm. Subgroup analyses were performed for each BMI category. RESULTS We analyzed 414 recordings from 95 patients: 34 were overweight and 15 were obese. The OptiBP application had a performance acceptance rate of 82%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) differences between the optical BP estimations and the auscultatory reference rates (criterion 1) were respected in all subgroups: SBP mean value was 2.08 (SD 7.58); 1.32 (6.44); -2.29 (5.62) respectively in obese, overweight and normal weight subgroup. For criterion 2, which investigates the precision errors on an individual level, the threshold for systolic BP in the obese group was slightly above the requirement for this criterion. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that the OptiBP application is easily applicable to overweight and obese participants. Differences between the reference measure and the OptiBP estimation were within ISO limits (criterion 1). In obese participants, the SD of mean error was outside criterion 2 limits. Whether auscultatory measurement, due to arm morphology or the OptiBP is associated with increasing bias in obese still needs to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Caillat
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Degott
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Arlene Wuerzner
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Proençain
- Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Bonnier
- Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Virginie Durgnat
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Hofmann
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Wuerzner
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Schoettker
- Service of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Talukdar D, De Deus LF, Sehgal N. Evaluation of a Camera-Based Monitoring Solution Against Regulated Medical Devices to Measure Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation, and Blood Pressure. Cureus 2022; 14:e31649. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
15
|
Desebbe O, Anas C, Alexander B, Kouz K, Knebel JF, Schoettker P, Creteur J, Vincent JL, Joosten A. Evaluation of a novel optical smartphone blood pressure application: a method comparison study against invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:259. [PMID: 35971072 PMCID: PMC9376576 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01797-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Arterial hypertension is a worldwide public health problem. While it is currently diagnosed and monitored non-invasively using the oscillometric method, having the ability to measure blood pressure (BP) using a smartphone application could provide more widespread access to hypertension screening and monitoring. In this observational study in intensive care unit patients, we compared blood pressure values obtained using a new optical smartphone application (OptiBP™; test method) with arterial BP values obtained using a radial artery catheter (reference method) in order to help validate the technology. Methods We simultaneously measured three BP values every hour for five consecutive hours on two consecutive days using both the smartphone and arterial methods. Bland–Altman and error grid analyses were used for agreement analysis between both approaches. The performance of the smartphone application was investigated using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definitions, which require the bias ± SD between two technologies to be below 5 ± 8 mmHg. Results Among the 30 recruited patients, 22 patients had adequate OptiBP™ values and were thus analyzed. In the other 8 patients, no BP could be measured due to inadequate signals. The Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean of the differences ± SD between both methods of 0.9 ± 7 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP), 0.2 ± 14 mmHg for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), and 1.1 ± 6 mmHg for diastolic arterial pressure (DAP). Error grid analysis demonstrated that the proportions of measurement pairs in risk zones A to E were 88.8% (no risk), 10% (low risk), 1% (moderate risk), 0% (significant risk), and 0% (dangerous risk) for MAP and 88.4%, 8.6%, 3%, 0%, 0%, respectively, for SAP. Conclusions This method comparison study revealed good agreement between BP values obtained using the OptiBP™ and those done invasively. The OptiBP™ fulfills the AAMI/ISO universal standards for MAP and DAP (but not SAP). Error grid showed that the most measurements (≥ 97%) were in risk zones A and B. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04728477
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Desebbe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Clinique de La Sauvegarde, 80 Avenue Ben Gourion, 69009, Lyon, France
| | - Chbabou Anas
- Department of Anesthesiology, CUB Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Brenton Alexander
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Patrick Schoettker
- Biospectal SA, 1003, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jacques Creteur
- Department of Intensive Care, CUB Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Department of Intensive Care, CUB Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, CUB Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Anesthesiology, Paul Brousse Hospital, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frey L, Menon C, Elgendi M. Blood pressure measurement using only a smartphone. NPJ Digit Med 2022; 5:86. [PMID: 35794240 PMCID: PMC9259682 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension is an immense challenge in public health. As one of the most prevalent medical conditions worldwide, it is a major cause of premature death. At present, the detection, diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension are subject to several limitations. In this review, we conducted a literature search on blood pressure measurement using only a smartphone, which has the potential to overcome current limitations and thus pave the way for long-term ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on a large scale. Among the 333 articles identified, we included 25 relevant articles over the past decade (November 2011–November 2021) and analyzed the described approaches to the types of underlying data recorded with smartphone sensors, the signal processing techniques applied to construct the desired signals, the features extracted from the constructed signals, and the algorithms used to estimate blood pressure. In addition, we analyzed the validation of the proposed methods against reference blood pressure measurements. We further examined and compared the effectiveness of the proposed approaches. Among the 25 articles, 23 propose an approach that requires direct contact between the sensor and the subject and two articles propose a contactless approach based on facial videos. The sample sizes in the identified articles range from three to 3000 subjects, where 8 articles used sample sizes of 85 or more subjects. Furthermore, 10 articles include hypertensive subjects in their participant pools. The methodologies applied for the evaluation of blood pressure measurement accuracy vary considerably among the analyzed articles. There is no consistency regarding the methods for blood pressure data collection and the reference blood pressure measurement and validation. Moreover, no established protocol is currently available for the validation of blood pressure measuring technologies using only a smartphone. We conclude the review with a discussion of the results and with recommendations for future research on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Frey
- Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Menon
- Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Elgendi
- Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices: review and statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability. J Hypertens 2022; 40:1449-1460. [PMID: 35708294 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently on the market claiming that they provide accurate BP measurements. These technologies have considerable potential to improve the awareness, treatment, and management of hypertension. However, recent guidelines by the European Society of Hypertension do not recommend cuffless devices for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. OBJECTIVE This statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on BP Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability presents the types of cuffless BP technologies, issues in their validation, and recommendations for clinical practice. STATEMENTS Cuffless BP monitors constitute a wide and heterogeneous group of novel technologies and devices with different intended uses. Cuffless BP devices have specific accuracy issues, which render the established validation protocols for cuff BP devices inadequate for their validation. In 2014, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers published a standard for the validation of cuffless BP devices, and the International Organization for Standardization is currently developing another standard. The validation of cuffless devices should address issues related to the need of individual cuff calibration, the stability of measurements post calibration, the ability to track BP changes, and the implementation of machine learning technology. Clinical field investigations may also be considered and issues regarding the clinical implementation of cuffless BP readings should be investigated. CONCLUSION Cuffless BP devices have considerable potential for changing the diagnosis and management of hypertension. However, fundamental questions regarding their accuracy, performance, and implementation need to be carefully addressed before they can be recommended for clinical use.
Collapse
|
18
|
Habas E, Habas E, Khan FY, Rayani A, Habas A, Errayes M, Farfar KL, Elzouki ANY. Blood Pressure and Chronic Kidney Disease Progression: An Updated Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e24244. [PMID: 35602805 PMCID: PMC9116515 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension (HTN) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and it may aggravate CKD progression. The optimal blood pressure (BP) value in CKD patients is not established yet, although systolic BP ≤130 mmHg is acceptable as a target. Continuous BP monitoring is essential to detect the different variants of high BP and monitor the treatment response. Various methods of BP measurement in the clinic office and at home are currently used. One of these methods is ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), by which BP can be closely assessed for even diurnal changes. We conducted a non-systematic literature review to explore and update the association between high BP and the course of CKD and to review various BP monitoring methods to determine the optimal method for BP recording in CKD patients. PubMed, EMBASE, Google, Google Scholar, and Web Science were searched for published reviews and original articles on BP and CKD by using various phrases and keywords such as "hypertension and CKD", "CKD progression and hypertension", "CKD stage and hypertension", "BP control in CKD", "BP measurement methods", "diurnal BP variation effect on CKD progression", and "types of hypertension." We evaluated and discussed published articles relevant to the review objective. Before preparing the final draft of this article, each author was assigned a section of the topic to read, research deeply, and write a summary about the assigned section. Then a summary of each author's contribution was collected and discussed in several group sessions. Early detection of high BP is essential to prevent CKD development and progression. Although the latest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines suggest that a systolic BP ≤120 mmHg is the target toprevent CKD progression, systolic BP ≤130 mmHg is universally recommended.ABPM is a promising method to diagnose and follow up on BP control; however, the high cost of the new devices and patient unfamiliarity with them have proven to be major disadvantages with regard to this method.
Collapse
|
19
|
Vischer AS, Rosania J, Socrates T, Blaschke C, Eckstein J, Proust YM, Bonnier G, Proença M, Lemay M, Burkard T. Comparability of a Blood-Pressure-Monitoring Smartphone Application with Conventional Measurements-A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:749. [PMID: 35328302 PMCID: PMC8947665 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: New cuffless technologies attempting blood-pressure measurements (BPM) offer possibilities to improve hypertension awareness and control. The aim of this study was to compare a smartphone application (app)-based algorithm with office BPM (OBPM). (2) Methods: We included consecutive patients with an indication for ambulatory BPM. The smartphone app (RIVA digital) acquired the pulse wave in the fingers’ arterial bed using the phone’s camera and estimated BP based on photoplethysmographic (PPG) waveforms. Measurements were alternatingly taken with an oscillometric cuff-based device and smartphone BPM (AppBP) on two consecutive days. AppBP were calibrated to the first OBPM. Each AppBP was compared to its CuffBP (mean of the previous/following OBPM). (3) Results: 50 participants were included, resulting in 50 AppBP values on Day 1 and 33 on Day 2 after exclusion of 225 AppBP due to insufficient quality. The mean ± SD of the differences between AppBP and CuffBP was 0.7 ± 9.4/1.0 ± 4.5 mmHg (p-value 0.739/0.201) on Day 1 and 2.6 ± 8.2/1.3 ± 4.1 mmHg (p-value 0.106/0.091) on Day 2 for systolic/diastolic values, respectively. There were no significant differences between the deviations on Day 1 and Day 2 (p-value 0.297/0.533 for systolic/diastolic values). Overall, there were 10 (12%) systolic measurement pairs differing by >15 mmHg. (4) Conclusions: In this pilot evaluation, the RIVA Digital app shows promising results when compared to oscillometric cuff-based measurements, especially regarding diastolic values. Its differences between AppBP−CuffBP have a good stability one day after calibration. Before clinical use, signal acquisition needs improvement and the algorithm needs to undergo formal validation against a gold-standard BPM method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annina S. Vischer
- Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.R.); (T.S.); (C.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Jana Rosania
- Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.R.); (T.S.); (C.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Thenral Socrates
- Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.R.); (T.S.); (C.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Christina Blaschke
- Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.R.); (T.S.); (C.B.); (T.B.)
| | - Jens Eckstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Yara-Maria Proust
- Centre Suisse d’Electronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM), 2002 Neuchatel, Switzerland; (Y.-M.P.); (G.B.); (M.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Guillaume Bonnier
- Centre Suisse d’Electronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM), 2002 Neuchatel, Switzerland; (Y.-M.P.); (G.B.); (M.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Martin Proença
- Centre Suisse d’Electronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM), 2002 Neuchatel, Switzerland; (Y.-M.P.); (G.B.); (M.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Mathieu Lemay
- Centre Suisse d’Electronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM), 2002 Neuchatel, Switzerland; (Y.-M.P.); (G.B.); (M.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Thilo Burkard
- Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.R.); (T.S.); (C.B.); (T.B.)
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluation of a new smartphone optical blood pressure application (OptiBP™) in the post-anesthesia care unit: a method comparison study against the non-invasive automatic oscillometric brachial cuff as the reference method. J Clin Monit Comput 2022; 36:1525-1533. [PMID: 34978654 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00795-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We compared blood pressure (BP) values obtained with a new optical smartphone application (OptiBP™) with BP values obtained using a non-invasive automatic oscillometric brachial cuff (reference method) during the first 2 h of surveillance in a post-anesthesia care unit in patients after non-cardiac surgery. Three simultaneous BP measurements of both methods were recorded every 30 min over a 2-h period. The agreement between measurements was investigated using Bland-Altman and error grid analyses. We also evaluated the performance of the OptiBP™ using ISO81060-2:2018 standards which requires the mean of the differences ± standard deviation (SD) between both methods to be less than 5 mmHg ± 8 mmHg. Of 120 patients enrolled, 101 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean of the differences ± SD between the test and reference methods of + 1 mmHg ± 7 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP), + 2 mmHg ± 11 mmHg for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), and + 1 mmHg ± 8 mmHg for diastolic arterial pressure (DAP). Error grid analysis showed that the proportions of measurement pairs in risk zones A to E were 90.3% (no risk), 9.7% (low risk), 0% (moderate risk), 0% (significant risk), 0% (dangerous risk) for MAP and 89.9%, 9.1%, 1%, 0%, 0% for SAP. We observed a good agreement between BP values obtained by the OptiBP™ system and BP values obtained with the reference method. The OptiBP™ system fulfilled the AAMI validation requirements for MAP and DAP and error grid analysis indicated that the vast majority of measurement pairs (≥ 99%) were in risk zones A and B.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04262323.
Collapse
|
21
|
Okoye EC, Onwuakagba IU, Agbapulonwu LC, Mgbeojedo UG, Okonkwo UP, Nwankwo MJ. Validation of an iCare Health Monitor smartphone application in the assessment of vital signs among stroke survivors in a poor-resource country. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221143228. [DOI: 10.1177/20552076221143228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Frequent and accurate monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is a vital part of stroke management. There is therefore the need for availability of simple, portable and accurate devices for monitoring BP at any point in time. Objective To determine the validity and reliability of the iCare Health Monitor (iCHM) smartphone application in the measurement of BP, heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) amongst stroke survivors in Anambra State. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey involving 86 stroke survivors (64.0% males; mean age = 65.23 ± 12.10 years) consecutively recruited from three conveniently selected centres in Anambra State. BP, PR and RR were assessed using both the standardised methods and iCHM. The parameters were reassessed with the iCHM after few minutes. Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the iCHM were determined using Pearson product moment correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient respectively at an alpha level of 0.05. Results The convergent validity of the iCHM was excellent in measuring systolic BP (SBP) ( r = 0.96; p < 0.01), diastolic BP (DBP) ( r = 0.93; p < 0.01), HR ( r = 0.96; p < 0.01) but moderate in measuring RR ( r = 0.74; p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability of the iCHM was excellent in assessing SBP (ICC = 0.95; p < 0.01), DBP (ICC = 0.94; p < 0.01) and HR (ICC = 0.92; p < 0.01) but poor in assessing RR (ICC = 0.35; p = 0.03). Also, the iCHM displayed clinically insignificant bias. Conclusion The iCHM is a valid and reliable tool for assessing BP and HR (but not RR) among stroke survivors. Its use is therefore recommended especially in poor-resource countries where gadgets for assessing BP and PR might not easily be affordable and available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel C Okoye
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria
- Physiotherapy Department, Bowen University, Iwo, Nigeria
| | - Ifeoma U Onwuakagba
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | - Lydia C Agbapulonwu
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | - Ukamaka G Mgbeojedo
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Uchenna P Okonkwo
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | - Maduabuchi J Nwankwo
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Burnier M, Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Oparil S. Cuff-less measurements of blood pressure: are we ready for a change? Blood Press 2021; 30:205-207. [PMID: 34308727 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1956178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sverre E Kjeldsen
- Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Krzysztof Narkiewicz
- Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|