Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease: from phenotyping to possible treatments

Reevaluating diagnosis in interstitial lung disease with a second multidisciplinary discussion

BACKGROUND

The importance of multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is emphasized by several international guidelines. While initial diagnoses are often provisional and require periodic re-evaluation, there is a lack of literature regarding the role of follow-up MDD in clinical practice.

METHODS

From September 2020 to January 2022, patients underwent an initial MDD (MDD1) based on clinical, radiological, and pathological evaluations. Each diagnosis was assigned a confidence level. One year later, a second MDD (MDD2) was conducted for re-evaluation, based on subsequent clinical and radiological information. Changes in diagnosis and confidence levels between MDD1 and MDD2 were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 52 patients enrolled in both MDDs, the diagnosis for 13 (25%) was revised at MDD2. Of these, 10 patients were initially diagnosed with unclassifiable ILD, and 3 received a low confidence diagnosis of either idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. The most common diagnostic revision was due to the deterioration after antigen exposure or improvement after antigen avoidance, which resulted in a revised diagnosis of HP at MDD2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the importance of periodic reassessment of MDD to improve the accuracy of ILD diagnosis. This study highlights the significance of longitudinal clinical and radiological evaluation for diagnostic revision, even in situations when rebiopsy is not feasible.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Integrating Clinical Probability into the Diagnostic Approach to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An International Working Group Perspective

BACKGROUND

When considering the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), experienced clinicians integrate clinical features that help to differentiate IPF from other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, thus generating a "pre-test" probability of IPF. The aim of this international working group perspective was to summarize these features using a tabulated approach similar to chest HRCT and histopathologic patterns reported in the international guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF, and to help formally incorporate these clinical likelihoods into diagnostic reasoning to facilitate the diagnosis of IPF.

METHODS

The committee group identified factors that influence the clinical likelihood of a diagnosis of IPF, which was categorized as a pre-test clinical probability of IPF into "high" (70-100%), "intermediate" (30-70%), or "low" (0-30%). After integration of radiological and histopathological features, the post-test probability of diagnosis was categorized into "definite" (90-100%), "high confidence" (70-89%), "low confidence" (51-69%), or "low" (0-50%) probability of IPF.

FINDINGS

A conceptual Bayesian framework was created, integrating the clinical likelihood of IPF ("pre-test probability of IPF") with the HRCT pattern, the histopathology pattern when available, and/or the pattern of observed disease behavior into a "post-test probability of IPF". The diagnostic probability of IPF was expressed using an adapted diagnostic ontology for fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

INTERPRETATION

The present approach will help incorporate the clinical judgement into the diagnosis of IPF, thus facilitating the application of IPF diagnostic guidelines and, ultimately improving diagnostic confidence and reducing the need for invasive diagnostic techniques.

Radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesion in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

Background

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is characterised by predominant upper lobe pleural and subpleural lung parenchymal fibrosis. Radiological PPFE-like lesion has been associated with various types of interstitial lung diseases. However, the prevalence and clinical significance of radiological PPFE-like lesion in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) are not fully understood. We aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical impact on survival of radiological PPFE-like lesion in patients with IIPs.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis was conducted using data from the Japanese nationwide cloud-based database of patients with IIPs. All the patients in the database were diagnosed as having IIPs by multidisciplinary discussion. Patients diagnosed with idiopathic PPFE were excluded. Clinical data and chest computed tomography (CT) image of 419 patients with IIPs were analysed. The presence of radiological PPFE-like lesion was independently evaluated by two chest radiologists blind to the clinical data.

Results

Of the 419 patients with IIPs, radiological PPFE-like lesions were detected in 101 (24.1%) patients, mainly in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and unclassifiable IIPs, but less in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Prognostic analyses revealed that radiological PPFE-like lesion was significantly associated with poor outcome in patients with IIPs, which was independent of age, IPF diagnosis and %FVC. In survival analyses, the patients with radiological PPFE-like lesions had poor survival compared with those without (log-rank, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that radiological PPFE-like lesion was significantly associated with poor survival both in patients with IPF and those with unclassifiable IIPs.

Conclusion

Radiological PPFE-like lesion is a condition that could exist in IIPs, mainly in IPF and unclassifiable IIPs. Importantly, the radiological PPFE-like lesion is a non-invasive marker to predict poor outcome in patients with IIPs, which should be carefully considered in clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01892-9.

Unclassifiable, or simply unclassified interstitial lung disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a subset of ILDs which cannot be classified according to the current diagnostic framework. This is a likely a heterogeneous group of diseases rather than a single entity and it is poorly defined and hence problematic for prognosis and therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

With increased treatment options for progressive fibrosing ILD it is increasingly relevant to correctly categorise ILD.

SUMMARY

This review article will summarise the definition and reasons for a diagnosis of unclassifiable ILD, the current management options and possible future approaches to improve diagnosis and differentiation within this broad subset. Finally, we will describe the implications of the labelling of unclassifiable ILD in clinical practice and research and whether the term 'unclassified' should be used, implying a less definitive diagnosis.

Acute exacerbation of unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background:

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is well known as a life-threatening condition during its clinical course. However, the clinical features and prognosis in AE of unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (AE-UCIIP) remain to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features and prognosis of AE-UCIIP compared with those of AE-IPF.

Methods:

In 187 patients with UCIIP or IPF, 64 patients with AE-UCIIP or AE-IPF, who were diagnosed and treated at our hospital, were retrospectively evaluated.

Results:

A total of 24 patients with AE-UCIIP were significantly older (p = 0.011), included more women (p < 0.001) and never-smokers (p < 0.001), and showed fewer lung lesions on high-resolution computed tomography (p = 0.006) than 40 patients with AE-IPF. Incidence of AE-UCIIP was 10.29%/year and was significantly higher than in AE-IPF (Gray’s test, p = 0.008). Prognosis of AE-UCIIP was as poor as that of AE-IPF (log-rank, p = 0.681). Percent-predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.934, p = 0.045], and GAP stage within 12 months before AE (HR 3.530, p = 0.023), and partial pressure arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio at AE (HR 0.998, p = 0.016) were significant prognostic factors. Finally, commencement of long-duration (⩾12 h) direct hemoperfusion with a polymyxin B-immobilised fibre column (PMX-DHP) within 2 days after admission significantly improved survival (log-rank, p = 0.038) and was a significant prognostic factor (HR 0.175, p = 0.0039) in AE-UCIIP. Long-duration PMX-DHP showed favourable treatment effects even in the combined group of patients with AE-UCIIP or AE-IPF (log-rank p = 0.002; HR 0.328, p = 0.006).

Conclusions:

Patients with AE-UCIIP were older and included more women and never-smokers than those with AE-IPF. Prognosis of AE-UCIIP was as poor as that of AE-IPF.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Progression in the Management of Non-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial Lung Diseases, Where Are We Now and Where We Would Like to Be

A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function, progressive fibrosis on chest computed tomography and increased mortality. The clinical course in these patients mimics the relentless progressiveness of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Common pathophysiological mechanisms such as a shared genetic susceptibility and a common downstream pathway—self-sustaining fibroproliferation—support the concept of a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which is applicable to a broad range of non-IPF ILDs. While antifibrotic drugs became the standard of care in IPF, immunosuppressive agents are still the mainstay of treatment in non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD). However, recently, randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic treatment in systemic sclerosis-associated F-ILD and a broad range of F-ILDs with a progressive phenotype. This review summarizes the current pharmacological management and highlights the unmet needs in patients with non-IPF ILD.

Clinical, radiological, and pathological evaluation of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern compared with NSIP in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and organizing pneumonia (OP) are major subtypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and closely related to connective tissue diseases (CTDs). "NSIP with OP overlap" is a controversial finding that has recently appeared in the criteria of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). However, details of this controversial entity are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern in IIPs and to identify differences from idiopathic NSIP (iNSIP).

METHODS

In 524 patients with interstitial pneumonia from 39 institutes who underwent surgical lung biopsy, 444 were diagnosed as IIPs by a multidisciplinary discussion meeting via a cloud-based integrated database. Among these patients, 44 (9.9%) who had iNSIP and 21 (4.7%) with histopathologically-defined "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (a pathological NSIP and OP pattern, but without a UIP pattern) were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Patients with "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern showed a significantly greater extent of consolidation (p < 0.001), more subpleural ground glass attenuation (p = 0.036), and more peripheral + bronchovascular distribution (p = 0.009) on high-resolution computed tomography than those with iNSIP. The incidences of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up was similar between the groups and polymyositis/dermatomyositis was the most frequent CTD in both groups. Nearly half of the patients fulfilled IPAF criteria, but no significant difference was found between iNSIP and "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (47.7% vs. 42.9, p = 0.712). The incidence of acute exacerbation and the survival rates were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern is 4.7% in IIPs. The frequency of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up, mainly polymyositis/dermatomyositis, the frequency of acute exacerbation, and the survival rate in "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern are similar to those of iNSIP.

Clinical and Functional Characteristics of Patients with Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease (uILD): Long-Term Follow-Up Data from European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg)

(1) Aim of the study: In spite of extensive research, up to 20% of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) patients cannot be safely classified. We analyzed clinical features, progression factors, and outcomes of unclassifiable ILD (uILD). (2) Methods: A total of 140 uILD subjects from the University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC) were recruited between 11/2009 and 01/2019 into the European Registry for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (eurIPFreg) and followed until 01/2020. The diagnosis of uILD was applied only when a conclusive diagnosis could not be reached with certainty. (3) Results: In 46.4% of the patients, the uILD diagnosis was due to conflicting clinical, radiological, and pathological data. By applying the diagnostic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) based on computed tomography (CT), published by the Fleischner Society, 22.2% of the patients displayed a typical UIP pattern. We also showed that forced vital capacity (FVC) at baseline (p = 0.008), annual FVC decline ≥10% (p < 0.0001), smoking (p = 0.033), and a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) ≤55% of predicted value at baseline (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with progressive disease. (4) Conclusions: The most important prognostic factors in uILD are baseline level and decline in lung function and smoking. The use of Fleischner diagnostic criteria allows further differentiation and accurate diagnosis.

Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice

Background

The safety of pirfenidone on pulmonary fibrosis patients with other kinds of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Furthermore, its effectiveness-related factors on IPF patients are not quite explored.

Methods

A retrospective study, on patients prescribed pirfenidone for pulmonary fibrosis, was conducted to assess effectiveness on IPF patients and tolerability of all patients with lung fibrosis. The effectiveness of pirfenidone was tested on 110 IPF subjects receiving treatment for ≥3 months by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Response-linked factors and progression-free survival (PFS) were also analyzed. The data about safety outcomes and drug dose adjustments were collected from all included subjects.

Results

A total of 176 subjects were included: 117 were IPF, 19 connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), and 40 unclassifiable ILD. Out of the 110 IPF subjects, 89 subjects were assessed as stable and 21 as progressive, out of which 10 died of acute exacerbation and 11 progressed. The effectiveness was significantly related to their baseline body mass index (BMI). IPF subjects with BMI>25kg/m² or diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco)>30% had higher PFS rate. The most common adverse events were skin-related and gastrointestinal-related. Drug discontinuation owing to adverse events occurred similarly in these three groups.

Conclusion

Pirfenidone was well tolerated in most of the lung fibrosis patients besides IPF, with a similar pattern of adverse events. Nearly 80% of IPF subjects were assessed as stable. More benefits were seen in IPF patients with higher BMI or mild-to-moderate disease.

Nationwide cloud-based integrated database of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias for multidisciplinary discussion

Multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) requiring close communication between specialists (clinicians, radiologists and pathologists) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). However, MDD by specialists is not always feasible because they are often separated by time and location. An online database would facilitate data sharing and MDD. Our aims were to develop a nationwide cloud-based integrated database containing clinical, radiological and pathological data of patients with IIPs along with a web-based MDD system, and to validate the diagnostic utility of web-based MDD in IIPs.

Clinical data, high-resolution computed tomography images and lung biopsy slides from patients with IIPs were digitised and uploaded to separate servers to develop a cloud-based integrated database. Web-based MDD was performed using the database and video-conferencing to reach a diagnosis.

Clinical, radiological and pathological data of 524 patients in 39 institutions were collected, uploaded and incorporated into the cloud-based integrated database. Subsequently, web-based MDDs with a pulmonologist, radiologist and pathologist using the database and video-conferencing were successfully performed for the 465 cases with adequate data. Overall, the web-based MDD changed the institutional diagnosis in 219 cases (47%). Notably, the MDD diagnosis yielded better prognostic separation among the IIPs than did the institutional diagnosis.

This is the first study of developing a nationwide cloud-based integrated database containing clinical, radiological and pathological data for web-based MDD in patients with IIPs. The database and the web-based MDD system that we built made MDD more feasible in practice, potentially increasing accurate diagnosis of IIPs.

Acloud-based integrated database of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias containing clinical, radiological and pathological data along with a web-based multidisciplinary discussion system can make discussions more feasible and improve disease managementhttp://ow.ly/NqqD30nYenb