18F-Labeled NaF PET-CT in Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Preoperative Lung Cancer

Early diagnostic value of ECT whole-body bone imaging combined with PINP and β-CTX for bone metastasis of lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This research was aimed at investigating the early diagnostic value of emission computed tomograph (ECT) whole-body bone imaging combined with PINP and β-CTX for bone metastasis of lung cancer.

METHODS

Case data of 86 lung cancer patients were categorized into lung cancer with bone metastasis (LCWBM, 46 cases) and lung cancer without bone metastasis (LCWOBM, 40 cases) groups according to the presence or absence of bone metastasis. Patients' general information were collected. ECT whole-body bone imaging was used to detect bone metastases and the grading of the extent of disease (EOD) in both groups, and electrochemiluminescence was utilized to detect the serum levels of PINP and β-CTX. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to evaluate the correlation between EOD grading and PINP and β-CTX levels. Logistic univariate and multivariate regression was implemented to analyze the risk factors of bone metastasis of lung cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of the single test of ECT whole-body bone imaging, PINP, or β-CTX and the combination of the three tests.

RESULTS

The differences in pathological type, clinical stage and EOD grading, the number of positive ECT cases, and the expression levels of PINP and β-CTX between the LCWBM and LCWOBM groups were statistically significant. In LCWBM patients with different EOD grading, the trends of the expression of PINP and β-CTX were grade 3 > grade 2 > grade 1 and grade 0. Further correlation analyses revealed that EOD grading showed a significant positive correlation with the PINP and β-CTX expression levels. Univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that adenocarcinoma, TNM stage IV, ECT positivity, and high expression of PINP and β-CTX were associated with bone metastasis of lung cancer, and multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ECT positivity, high expression of PINP and β-CTX were independent risk factors for bone metastasis of lung cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) of ECT, PINP, and β-CTX alone for the diagnosis of bone metastasis of lung cancer were 0.872, 0.888, and 0.874, respectively, and the AUC for the combined diagnosis of the three was 0.963, which was greater than that of any one of the individual indices, with a sensitivity of 86.96% and a specificity of 97.50% at a Youden index of 0.845.

CONCLUSION

ECT whole-body bone imaging combined with PINP and β-CTX has high diagnostic value for bone metastasis of lung cancer.

The potential advantages of 18F sodium fluoride positron emission tomography-computed tomography for clinical staging and management planning in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

The staging and treatment planning of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) face challenges due to limited sensitivity of conventional imaging. 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) offers potential advantages in detecting early bone involvement. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the potential advantage of 18F-NaF PET/CT for clinical staging and management planning in patients with NPC and to compare 18F-NaF PET/CT findings with those of conventional imaging modalities.

Methods

We enrolled a cohort of patients with NPC who underwent 18F-NaF PET/CT at our PET/CT center between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2021, and analyzed the findings of 18F-NaF PET/CT and conventional imaging modalities. Data from multidisciplinary team discussions on clinical staging and management planning both before and after 18F-NaF PET/CT were recorded. Additionally, any changes in clinical staging and management planning following 18F-NaF PET/CT were documented.

Results

A total of 58 patients were included in this study. After 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging, clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging was observed to have changed in seven cases (12.1%). Among these, four cases had changes in T stage and three cases in the M stage. Additionally, changes in clinical management plans were observed in eight patients (13.8%). Changes due the results of 18F-NaF PET/CT included three cases with major modification (two cases switched from curative treatment to palliative treatment, and one case switched from palliative treatment to curative treatment) and five cases with minor changes. The minor changes involved alteration to the radiotherapy target volume (three cases with an increased target volume and one case with a reduced target area). Furthermore, one case required an alteration to the radiotherapy strategy for local bone involvement.

Conclusions

The use of 18F-NaF PET/CT in patients newly diagnosed with NPC may offer potential advantages for clinical staging and treatment planning, enabling physicians to select a more individualized treatment approach.

Comparison of the diagnostic value of 18F-NaF PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Bone scintigraphy, the standard tool for detecting bone metastases has some insufficiencies; thus, supplementary imaging techniques are needed. This study is a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies reporting and comparing the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and 99mTc-MDP single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for bone metastases.

Methods

Literature related to the diagnosis of bone metastases using 18F-NaF PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP SPECT was searched on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang databases, and VIP. Evaluation of study quality was performed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were assessed along with heterogeneity. The subject operating characteristic curve was plotted, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, and the pre- and post-test probabilities were compared.

Results

Finally, 11 articles, consisting of 1,085 patients and 1,782 lesions, were included. At the patient level (11 articles), the results were pooled SEN =0.92 and SPE =0.96 for PET/CT, SEN =0.80 and SPE =0.90 for SPECT. The AUC of PET/CT [0.98 (0.96-0.99)] was higher than that of SPECT [0.92 (0.89-0.94), P<0.05]. At the lesion level (6 articles), the results were pooled SEN =0.96 and SPE =0.98 for PET/CT, SEN =0.76 and SPE =0.94 for SPECT. The AUC of PET/CT [0.99 (0.98-1.00)] was higher than that of SPECT [0.94 (0.92-0.96); P<0.05]. Statistical heterogeneity existed, and meta-regression showed that, at patient-based level, the study design type, tumor character, and the selection blinding method were the main sources of heterogeneity. Furthermore, both PET/CT and SPECT had superior SEN for osteogenic metastases than non-osteogenic metastases (P=0.01). At the lesion level, tumor character was a source of heterogeneity accompanied by an increased SEN for osteogenic metastases, and the SEN for SPECT combined with CT was improved [SEN =0.87 (0.68-1.00), P=0.03].

Conclusions

18F-NaF PET/CT has a higher SEN and SPE than 99mTc-MDP SPECT in diagnosing bone metastases, nevertheless, it is necessary to fully understand the primary tumor and the characteristics of the imaging protocol to choose suitable modality for individuals. Combining SPECT with CT improves the diagnostic efficacy than having SPECT alone and can be a powerful supplement to PET/CT for suspected osteogenic bone metastases.

The value of 18F-NaF PET/CT in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using visual and quantitative analyses

To assess the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT in diagnosing bone metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using visual and quantitative analyses. 164 patients with NPC who underwent ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT between 2017 and 2021 were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. All bone lesions were divided into metastatic bone lesion group and benign lesion group; the benign lesion group was further subdivided into benign lesion without osteophyte and fracture group (CT images showing no osteophyte, no fracture), and benign lesion with osteophyte and fracture group (CT images showing typical osteophytes and fractures), the differences in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were compared between every two groups, and the diagnostic cut-off values were derived from receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD, multiple continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons among more than two groups were made using the Bonferroni method. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT for the diagnosis of bone metastases in NPC were 97.1%, 94.6%, and 95.1% based on the patient level and 99.5%, 91.5%, and 96.4% based on the lesion level, respectively. The SUVmax was significantly different between the metastatic bone lesion group and the benign lesion without osteophyte and fracture group (p < 0.05); the area under the curve was 0.865, the threshold was 12.5, the sensitivity was 0.912, and the specificity was 0.656. Visual analysis of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bone metastases in NPC. After excluding osteophytes and fracture lesions based on CT findings, using SUVmax ≥12.5 as the threshold can be an important reference for the differential diagnosis of bone metastases and benign bone lesions in patients with NPC.

Comparison of Bone Metastases between 18F-NaF PET/CT, 18F-NaF PET, and Planar 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

Our study aims to compare the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-NaF positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT), ¹⁸F-NaF PET, and planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Our study retrospectively analyzed 58 patients with pathologically proven NPC. They all underwent both ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT and planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy within a 7-day interval. Bone metastases were confirmed by follow-up using PET/CT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These three examinations were compared using per-patient-based analysis and per-lesion-based analysis.

Results

19 patients (32.7%) were classified as having bone metastatic disease in their final diagnosis. The patient-based diagnostic performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy) were as follows: ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT (100%, 92.3%, and 94.8%), ¹⁸F-NaF PET (100%, 53.8%, and 69.0%), and planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (78.9%, 74.4%, and 75.9%). The overall accuracy of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT was significantly more favorable compared to ¹⁸F-NaF PET (p=0.002) and to planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (p=0.044). The lesion-based diagnostic performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy) were as follows: ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT (98.5%, 93.9%, and 96.6%), ¹⁸F-NaF PET (98.5%, 57.1%, and 81.1%), and planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (69.9%, 85.7%, and 76.4%).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT outperforms ¹⁸F-NaF PET or planar ^99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases with newly diagnosed NPC on a patient-based and lesion-based analysis.

Clinical value of dual-phase F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT for diagnosing bone metastasis in cancer patients with solitary bone lesion

Background

The present study aimed to investigate whether dual-phase F-18 sodium-fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could improve the diagnostic accuracy of detecting bone metastasis in cancer patients with a solitary bone lesion compared to conventional F-18 NaF PET/CT.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 113 cancer patients who underwent dual-phase F-18 NaF PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of a solitary bone lesion seen on bone scintigraphy. According to the dual-phase PET/CT protocol, an early-phase scan was acquired immediately after radiotracer injection and a conventional F-18 NaF PET/CT scan was performed. The diagnostic abilities of the visual analysis of conventional and dual-phase PET/CT scans and two quantitative parameters (lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio on early-phase scan and lesion-to-bone uptake ratio on conventional scan) for detecting bone metastasis were compared. The final diagnosis of bone metastasis was made by histopathological confirmation or follow-up imaging studies.

Results

A metastatic bone lesion was diagnosed in 28 patients (24.8%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100.0%, 70.6%, and 77.9%, respectively, for visual analysis of conventional F-18 NaF PET/CT, 92.9%, 42.4%, 54.9%, respectively, for lesion-to-bone uptake ratio, 96.4%, 88.2%, and 90.3%, respectively, for visual analysis of dual-phase PET/CT, and 92.9%, 81.2%, and 83.2%, respectively, for lesion-to-blood pool uptake ratio. Visual analysis of dual-phase PET/CT was shown to have the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.923; 95% CI, 0.858-0.965) among all parameters.

Conclusions

Dual-phase F-18 NaF PET/CT showed a high diagnostic ability for detecting bone metastasis with improved specificity and accuracy compared to conventional F-18 NaF PET/CT in cancer patients. Dual-phase F-18 NaF PET/CT might help diagnose bone metastasis in patients with malignancies who were shown to have a solitary bone lesion on bone scintigraphy.

Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/computed tomography in the diagnosis of skull-base bone invasion and osseous metastases in newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interobserver agreement and the diagnostic performance in F-sodium fluoride (F-NaF) PET/computed tomography (CT) for the detection of skull-base bone invasion (SBBI) and osseous metastases in patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients with newly diagnosed NPC between 2017 and 2019 who underwent F-NaF PET/CT was in included. Two experienced observers independently evaluated the F-NaF PET/CT of SBBI and osseous metastases on a patient level using a two-category scale present on a dichotomous scale, respectively. On a patient level, the diagnostic performance was calculated using a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement on a patient level of SBBI and osseous metastases were perfect on a patient-level (κ: 0.85), (κ: 0.808), respectively. On a lesion level of detection of osseous metastases, the observers agreed on the number as well as the location of osseous metastases in 101 (86.3%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of SBBI and osseous metastases were ranged 0.911-0.962, 0.921-0.974, 0.932-0.957, 0.962-0.986, and 0.841-0.923, and ranged 0.917-0.958, 0.899-0.957, 0.906-0.949, 0.863-0.936, and 0.939-0.970, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The interobserver agreement of F-NaF PET/CT for the detection of SBBI and osseous metastases in patients with NPC were both very high among trained observers. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of NaF PET/CT was satisfactory, rendering NaF PET/CT a robust tool in the diagnostic armamentarium.

Targeting of radioactive platinum-bisphosphonate anticancer drugs to bone of high metabolic activity

Platinum-based chemotherapeutics exhibit excellent antitumor properties. However, these drugs cause severe side effects including toxicity, drug resistance, and lack of tumor selectivity. Tumor-targeted drug delivery has demonstrated great potential to overcome these drawbacks. Herein, we aimed to design radioactive bisphosphonate-functionalized platinum (^195mPt-BP) complexes to confirm preferential accumulation of these Pt-based drugs in metabolically active bone. In vitro NMR studies revealed that release of Pt from Pt BP complexes increased with decreasing pH. Upon systemic administration to mice, Pt-BP exhibited a 4.5-fold higher affinity to bone compared to platinum complexes lacking the bone-seeking bisphosphonate moiety. These Pt-BP complexes formed less Pt-DNA adducts compared to bisphosphonate-free platinum complexes, indicating that in vivo release of Pt from Pt-BP complexes proceeded relatively slow. Subsequently, radioactive ^195mPt-BP complexes were synthesized using ^195mPt(NO₃)₂(en) as precursor and injected intravenously into mice. Specific accumulation of ^195mPt-BP was observed at skeletal sites with high metabolic activity using micro-SPECT/CT imaging. Furthermore, laser ablation-ICP-MS imaging of proximal tibia sections confirmed that ^195mPt BP co-localized with calcium in the trabeculae of mice tibia.

18F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to establish the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. The performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT was compared with other imaging techniques in the same cohort of patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed/Medline and EMBASE (last Updated, September 28, 2018). Studies with histopathology confirmation and/or clinical/imaging follow-up as reference standard were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. Twelve studies including 507 patients provided per-patient basis information. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), 123.2 and 0.97, respectively. Seven studies provided the lesion-based accuracy information of 1812 lesions identified on ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87), 206.8 and 0.97, respectively. The overall diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to ^99mTc-bone scintigraphy (AUC 0.842; P < 0.001; four studies) and ^99mTc-SPECT (AUC 0.896; P < 0.001, four studies). Compared to ¹⁸F NaF-PET/CT, whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was shown to have lower sensitivity (0.83, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), with no significant difference in the overall performance (AUC 0.947; P = 0.18, four studies).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT has excellent diagnostic performance in the detection of bone metastases in staging and restaging of high-risk prostate cancer patients. The performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to ^99mTc bone scintigraphy and SPECT, and comparable to DWI-MRI.

Metastatic Seeding Attacks Bone Marrow, Not Bone: Rectifying Ongoing Misconceptions

Conventional modalities, such as bone scintigraphy, are commonly used to assess osseous abnormalities in skeletal metastasis. Fluorine-18 (¹⁸F)-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET similarly portrays osteoblastic activity but with improved spatial and contrast resolution and more accurate anatomic localization. However, these modalities rely on indirect evidence for tumor activity. PET imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and tumor-specific tracers may have an increased role by directly portraying the metabolic activity of cancer cells, which are often seeded in bone marrow and cause osseous disease after initial latency. This article describes the utility and limitations of these modalities in assessing skeletal metastases.

A Prospective Study Comparing 99mTc-Hydroxyethylene-Diphosphonate Planar Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body SPECT/CT with 18F-Fluoride PET/CT and 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI for Diagnosing Bone Metastases

We prospectively evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of ^99mTc-hydroxyethylene-diphosphonate (^99mTc-HDP) planar bone scintigraphy (pBS), ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT, and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/MRI for the detection of bone metastases. Methods: One hundred seventeen patients with histologically proven malignancy referred for clinical pBS were prospectively enrolled. pBS and whole-body SPECT/CT were performed followed by ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT within 9 d. ¹⁸F-NaF PET/MRI was also performed in 46 patients. Results: Bone metastases were confirmed in 16 patients and excluded in 101, which was lower than expected. The number of equivocal scans was significantly higher for pBS than for SPECT/CT and PET/CT (18 vs. 5 and 6, respectively; P = 0.004 and 0.01, respectively). When equivocal readings were excluded, no statistically significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or overall accuracy were found when comparing the different imaging techniques. In the per-patient analysis, equivocal scans were either assumed positive for metastases ("pessimistic analysis") or assumed negative for metastases ("optimistic analysis"). The percentages of misdiagnosed patients for the pessimistic analysis were 21%, 15%, 9%, and 7% for pBS, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI, respectively. Corresponding figures for the optimistic analysis were 9%, 12%, 5%, and 7%. In those patients identified as having bone metastases according to the reference standard, SPECT/CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT, and PET/MRI detected additional lesions compared with pBS in 31%, 63%, and 71%, respectively. Conclusion:¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT and whole-body SPECT/CT resulted in a significant reduction of equivocal readings compared with pBS, which implies an improved diagnostic confidence. However, the clinical benefit of using, for example, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT or PET/MRI as compared with SPECT/CT and pBS in this patient population with a relatively low prevalence of bone metastases (14%) is likely limited. This conclusion is influenced by the low prevalence of patients with osseous metastases. There may well be significant differences in the sensitivity of SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI compared with pBS, but a larger patient population or a patient population with a higher prevalence of bone metastases would have to be studied to demonstrate this.