Leonart LP, Fachi MM, Böger B, Silva MRD, Szpak R, Lombardi NF, Pedroso MLA, Pontarolo R. A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Longitudinal Studies on Drug Treatments for Gaucher Disease.
Ann Pharmacother 2023;
57:267-282. [PMID:
35815393 DOI:
10.1177/10600280221108443]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare disorder linked to the absence/deficiency of glucocerebrosidase. GD can be treated by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and substrate reduction therapy (SRT). The aim of this systematic review (SR) is to assess the effectiveness of drugs used for GD treatment.
DATA SOURCES
Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus, in April 2021. The search strategies encompassed the name of the disease and of the drug treatments. Manual search was also conducted.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
Observational and interventional longitudinal studies evaluating ERT and SRT for GD were included. Single mean meta-analyses were conducted for each drug using R.
DATA SYNTHESIS
The initial search retrieved 2246 articles after duplicates were removed. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 68 reports were included. The studies evaluated imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, taliglucerase alfa, miglustat, and eliglustat. The results showed that ERT is effective as a treatment in both naïve and experienced patients. Miglustat did not significantly improve blood outcomes in naïve patients and resulted in a decrease in the platelet levels of experienced patients. Eliglustat was mainly assessed for experienced patients and resulted in stable outcome values.
RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
This extensive SR confirms the effectiveness of GD treatments in short- and long-term follow-ups.
CONCLUSIONS
The results were favorable for all ERTs and for eliglustat. Based on the assessed evidence, miglustat did not achieved expressive results. However, all evidence should be interpreted considering its limitations and does not replace well-conducted randomized trials.
Collapse