Outcomes of patients undergoing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury with brain herniation: A retrospective study

Neurosurgical intervention in ultra-severe closed traumatic brain injury: Is it worth the effort?

Introduction

A subgroup of severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients, known as ultra-severe (us-TBI), is most commonly defined as a post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 3-5. There is uncertainty on whether these critically injured patients can benefit from neurosurgical intervention.

Research question

The available evidence regarding the decision-making and outcome following management of us-TBI patients is critically reviewed.

Material and methods

Selected databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were searched from 1979 to May 2024 for publications on us-TBI patients, with a focus on treatment strategy, mortality and functional outcomes. Inclusion criteria were adult patients >18 years old with closed head trauma and admission post-resuscitation GCS 3-5. Studies were independently assessed for inclusion by two reviewers, and potential disagreements were solved by consensus.

Results

Where such data could be extracted, mortality rate was 27-100%, and favorable outcome was observed in 4-30% of us-TBI patients. While early aggressive neurosurgical management was associated with decreased mortality, a high proportion of patients survived with unfavorable functional status.

Discussion and conclusion

With supportive care only, outcome of patients with us-TBI is almost universally poor. Early and aggressive neurosurgical intervention in addition to best medical management can lead to favorable functional outcome in selected cases particularly in younger patients with an initial GCS>3 and traumatic mass lesions. There is insufficient data regarding the effectiveness of neurosurgical management on the outcome of us-TBI patients. and the decision to initiate treatment should be based on an individual basis.

Comparison of Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a common critical neurosurgical condition, often requiring immediate surgical intervention. Craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy are the 2 mainstay surgical approaches. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the existing evidence and compare the outcomes of these 2 procedures.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched for relevant studies, published between inception of databases till June 2023. Eligible studies reported data of patients diagnosed with ASDH who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy for ASDH. Outcome measures included the Glasgow Coma Scale score, residual subdural hematoma, requirement of revision surgery, poorer outcomes, and mortality. Data were presented as pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed for each study.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 3095 patients were included. The results showed that patients who underwent craniotomy had significantly lower mortality, lower odds of poorer outcomes, and a higher rate of residual subdural hematoma, compared to patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy. There was no significant difference in the requirement of revision surgery between the 2 groups. Heterogeneity was high for most outcomes, and the quality of evidence ranged from moderate to low.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that craniotomy is associated with better clinical outcomes and lower mortality compared to decompressive craniectomy for ASDH, but a higher rate of residual subdural hematoma. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate our findings.

Time from injury to operative intervention in traumatic intracranial hematoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes in traumatic intracranial hematoma (TICH) have not improved significantly despite advances in trauma care. A modifiable factor in TICH management is time to operation room (TOR). TOR has become a key marker in Traumatic brain injury care despite a lack of contemporary evidence. This study aimed to determine the timing of TICH evacuation and its association with mortality and neurological outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Included studies reported data on adult patients with acute TICH who underwent surgical evacuation. The primary outcome was TOR and its association with mortality or functional neurological recovery.

RESULTS

From 1838 articles screened, 17 were included. Eight studies reported TOR as a continuous variable, ranging between 3 and 7.1 h. Three studies found better outcomes with shorter TOR, five found no difference, and one found worse outcomes with shorter TOR. Five articles were included in meta-analysis of mortality in patients undergoing operative decompression less than or greater than 4 h from injury which found lower mortality in the >4-h group, OR = 1.53. Longitudinal regression analysis showed no difference in TOR over the 33-year span of articles included.

CONCLUSION

There is limited data available on TOR in TICH, with equivocal results on the effect of timing on outcomes. TOR has not decreased over the last 4 decades. The unvalidated 4-h cut-off seems to be associated with better survival. Contemporary assessment of this potentially important performance indicator is required.

Time to traumatic intracranial hematoma evacuation: contemporary standard and room for improvement

PURPOSE

Traumatic intracranial hematoma (TICH) is a neurosurgical emergency with high mortality and morbidity. The time to operative decompression is a modifiable but inconsistently reported risk factor for TICH patients?

OUTCOMES

We aimed to provide contemporary time to evacuation data and long-term trends in timing of TICH evacuation in a trauma system.

METHODS

A 13-year retrospective cohort study ending in 2021 at a trauma system with one level-1 trauma center included all patients undergoing urgent craniotomy or craniectomy for evacuation of TICH. Demographics, injury severity and key timeframes of care were collected. Subgroups analyzed were polytrauma versus isolated head injury, direct admissions versus transfers and those who survived versus those who died. Linear regression of times from injury to operating room was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight TICH patients (Age: 35 (22-56); 58 (74%) males; ISS: 25(25-41); AIS head: 5 (4-5); mortality: 21 (27%) patients) were identified. Initial GCS was 8 (3.25-14) which decreased to 3 (3-7) by arrival in the trauma center. There were 46 (59%) patients intubated prior to arrival. Median time from injury to operation was 4.88 (3.63-6.80) hours. Linear regression of injury to OR showed increasing times to operative intervention for direct admissions to the trauma center over the study period (p=0.04). There was no associated change in mortality or Glasgow outcome score over the same time.

CONCLUSION

This contemporary data shows timing from injury to evacuation is approaching 5 hours. Over the 13-year study period the time to operative intervention significantly increased for direct admissions. This study will guide our institutions response to TICH presentations in the future. Other trauma systems should critically appraise their results with the same reporting standard.

Risk assessment and pathogen profile of surgical site infections in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing emergency craniotomy: A retrospective study

Emergency craniotomy in patients with traumatic brain injury poses a significant risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). Understanding the risk factors and pathogenic characteristics of SSIs in this context is crucial for improving outcomes. This comprehensive retrospective analysis spanned from February 2020 to February 2023 at our institution. We included 25 patients with SSIs post-emergency craniotomy and a control group of 50 patients without SSIs. Data on various potential risk factors were collected, including demographic information, preoperative conditions, and intraoperative details. The BACT/ALERT3D Automated Bacterial Culture and Detection System was utilized for rapid bacterial pathogen identification. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify significant risk factors for SSIs. The study identified Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus as the most prevalent pathogens in SSIs. Significant risk factors for SSIs included the lack of preoperative antibiotic use, postoperative drainage tube placement, diabetes mellitus, and the incorporation of invasive procedures, all of which showed a significant association with SSIs in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis further highlighted the protective effect of preoperative antibiotics and the increased risks associated with anaemia, diabetes mellitus, postoperative drainage tube placement, and the incorporation of invasive procedures. Our research underscores the critical role of factors like insufficient preoperative antibiotics, postoperative drainage, invasive techniques, anaemia, and diabetes mellitus in elevating the risk of surgical site infections in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing emergency craniotomy. Enhanced focus on these areas is essential for improving surgical outcomes.

Post-Traumatic Cerebral Infarction: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common diagnosis requiring acute hospitalization. Long-term, TBI is a significant source of health and socioeconomic impact in the United States and globally. The goal of clinicians who manage TBI is to prevent secondary brain injury. In this population, post-traumatic cerebral infarction (PTCI) acutely after TBI is an important but under-recognized complication that is associated with negative functional outcomes. In this comprehensive review, we describe the incidence and pathophysiology of PTCI. We then discuss the diagnostic and treatment approaches for the most common etiologies of isolated PTCI, including brain herniation syndromes, cervical artery dissection, venous thrombosis, and post-traumatic vasospasm. In addition to these mechanisms, hypercoagulability and microcirculatory failure can also exacerbate ischemia. We aim to highlight the importance of this condition and future clinical research needs with the goal of improving patient outcomes after TBI.

Current trends and challenges: The landscape of perioperative mortality in intracranial surgeries in low- and middle-income settings: A narrative review

Background and Aims

Intracranial surgeries are pivotal in treating cerebral pathologies, particularly in resource-limited contexts, utilizing techniques such as craniotomy, transsphenoidal approaches, and endoscopy. However, challenges in low and middle income countries (LMICs), including resource scarcity, diagnostic delays, and a lack of skilled neurosurgeons, lead to elevated perioperative mortality (POM). This review seeks to identify major contributors to these challenges and recommend solutions for improved patient outcomes in neurosurgical care within LMICs.

Methods

This review examines POM in LMICs using a detailed literature search, focusing on studies from these regions. Databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were utilized using specific terms related to "intracranial surgery," "perioperative mortality," "traumatic brain injuries," and "LMICs." Inclusion criteria covered various study designs and both pediatric and adult populations while excluding stand-alone abstracts and case reports.

Results

POM rates for intracranial surgeries differ widely across many low and middle-income regions: Africa sees rates from 2.5% to 39.1%, Asia between 3.6% and 34.8%, and Latin America and the Caribbean have figures ranging from 1.3% to 12%. The POM rates in LMICs were relatively higher compared to most first-world countries. The high POM rates in LMICs can be attributed to considerable delays and compromises in neurosurgical care delivery, exacerbated by late diagnoses and presentations of neurosurgical pathologies. This, coupled with limited resources, underdeveloped infrastructure, and training gaps, complicates intracranial disease management, leading to elevated POM.

Conclusion

Intracranial POM is a pronounced disparity within the neurosurgical field in LMICs. To mitigate intracranial POM, it is imperative to bolster healthcare infrastructure, amplify personnel training, foster global partnerships, and harness technologies like telemedicine. Tackling socioeconomic obstacles and prioritizing early detection through sustained funding and policy shifts can substantially enhance patient outcomes.

Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells-harvested mitochondrial transplantation improved motor function in TBI models through rescuing neuronal cells from apoptosis and alleviating astrogliosis and microglia activation

Each year, traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes a high rate of mortality throughout the world and those who survive have lasting disabilities. Given that the brain is a particularly dynamic organ with a high energy consumption rate, the inefficiency of current TBI treatment options highlights the necessity of repairing damaged brain tissue at the cellular and molecular levels, which according to research is aggravated due to ATP deficiency and reactive oxygen species surplus. Taking into account that mitochondria contribute to generating energy and controlling cellular stress, mitochondrial transplantation as a new treatment approach has lately reduced complications in a number of diseases by supplying healthy and functional mitochondria to the damaged tissue. For this reason, in this study, we used this technique to transplant human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs)-derived mitochondria as a suitable source for mitochondrial isolation into rat models of TBI to examine its therapeutic benefit and the results showed that the successful mitochondrial internalisation in the neuronal cells significantly reduced the number of brain cells undergoing apoptosis, alleviated astrogliosis and microglia activation, retained normal brain morphology and cytoarchitecture, and improved sensorimotor functions in a rat model of TBI. These data indicate that human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells-isolated mitochondrial transplantation improves motor function in a rat model of TBI via rescuing neuronal cells from apoptosis and alleviating astrogliosis and microglia activation, maybe as a result of restoring the lost mitochondrial content.

Bilaterally Fixed and Dilated Pupils Are Not the Kiss of Death in Patients with Transtentorial Herniation: A Single Surgeon's Experience

BACKGROUND

Bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils in the setting of transtentorial herniation have traditionally been considered a sign of futility. Such patients are often denied life-saving surgery based on the premise that meaningful functional recovery would be extremely unlikely. We sought to determine the survival and functional outcome in a cohort of patients who underwent aggressive medical and surgical management.

METHODS

Charts of all patients managed by a single surgeon over a 42-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Functional outcome was determined using modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Outcome was classified as good (mRS score 0-3), acceptable (mRS score 4), or poor (mRS score 5-6).

RESULTS

Patients were 7 men and 2 women with a mean age of 36 years (range, 16-66 years). Etiologies included stroke (4 patients), traumatic brain injury (4 patients), and malignant cerebral edema (1 patient). Preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores ranged from 3 to 7, and midline shift was 7-16 mm. All patients received emergency osmotic therapy before decompressive surgery. Time to surgery (from pupillary changes) was <150 minutes for all patients (median 94 minutes; range, 50-148 minutes). At 3 months, 5 patients (55.6%) had recovered, achieving a good (n = 3) or acceptable (n = 2) outcome. The other 4 patients failed to recover and ultimately died of their injury.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-selected patients with transtentorial herniation and bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils, aggressive and timely medical and surgical management may lead to substantial rates of survival and favorable functional outcome. Preconceived notions of a universally grim prognosis in such patients can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies.

Use of the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index to Predict Hospital-Acquired Infections and Length of Stay Among Neurotrauma Patients Undergoing Emergent Craniotomy/Craniectomy

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury is a significant public health concern often complicated by hospital-acquired infections (HAIs); however, previous evaluations of factors predictive of risk for HAI have generally been single-center analyses or limited to surgical site infections. Frailty assessment has been shown to provide effective risk stratification in neurosurgery. We evaluated whether frailty status or age is more predictive of HAIs and length of stay among neurotrauma patients requiring craniectomy/craniotomy.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2019 dataset was queried to identify neurotrauma patients who underwent craniectomies/craniotomies. The effects of frailty status (using the 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) and age on occurrence of HAIs and other 30-day adverse events were compared using univariate analysis. The discriminative ability of each measure was defined by multivariate modeling.

RESULTS

Of 3284 patients identified, 1172 (35.7%) contracted an HAI postoperatively. Increasing frailty score predicted increased HAI risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.77, P = 0.022 for mFI-5 = 1 and OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.30-3.11, P = 0.002 for mFI-5≥3), whereas increasing age did not (OR = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.989-1.002, P = 0.009). Median length of stay was significantly longer in patients with HAI (16 days [IQR = 9-23]) versus no HAI (7 days [IQR = 4-13]) (P < 0.001). Median daily costs on the ward and neuro-intensive care unit were higher with HAI than with no HAI (neuro-ICU: $111,818.08 [IQR = 46,418.05-189,947.34] vs. $48,920.41 [IQR = 20,185.20-107,712.54], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing mFI-5 correlated with increased HAI risk. Neurotrauma patients who developed an HAI after craniectomy/craniotomy had longer hospitalizations and higher care costs. Frailty scoring improves risk stratification among these patients and may assist in reducing total hospital length of stay and total accrued costs to patients.

Are bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils the kiss of death in patients with transtentorial herniation? Systematic review and pooled analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils (BFDP) in the setting of transtentorial herniation due to a space-occupying lesion have traditionally been considered a sign of futility. As a result, such patients may be denied life-saving decompressive surgery, resulting in very high mortality rates. We sought to determine survival rate and functional outcomes in patients with transtentorial herniation and BFDP following emergency decompressive surgery.

METHODS

Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, using a combination of 15 prespecified keywords, according to PRISMA methodology. Individual patient data were extracted, pooled, and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies totaling 503 patients were included. Study designs were: prospective cohort (n=1), retrospective cohort (n=15), case report (n=6). Nearly two-thirds of patients (67.7%) were male. Mean age was 41 years (range 3-82). Median preoperative Glasgow coma score (GCS) was 3 (range 3-6). Nearly two-thirds (66.9%) underwent surgical decompression within 2 hours of pupillary changes. Mean follow-up was 7 months (range 1-40). Two-thirds (67%) died. Among survivors, 50.5% had severe disability (GOS 2-3), while 49.5% had good outcome (GOS 4-5), representing 17% of the whole population. Given the methodological limitations, the prognostic value of age, GCS, and time to surgery could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests a rate of favorable recovery approaching 17% following decompressive surgery in patients with transtentorial herniation and BFDP, secondary to space-occupying lesions. In the setting of stroke or trauma, the clinical finding of BFDP should not be solely relied on as an indicator of futility. Prospective studies are warranted.

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic on Patients with Head Injuries in South Korea

Objective

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is affecting the characteristics of patients with head injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with head injuries at a regional emergency medical center in South Korea.

Methods

From April 2019 to November 2020, 350 patients with head injuries were admitted to our hospital. The study period was divided into the pre-COVID-19 (n=169) and COVID-19 (n=181) eras (10 months each). Patients with severe head injuries requiring surgery (n=74) were categorized into those who underwent surgery (n=41) and those who refused surgery (n=33).

Results

Head injuries in pediatric patients (<3 years) were more frequent in the COVID-19 era than in the pre-COVID-19 era (8.8% vs. 3.6%, p=0.048). More patients refused surgery in the COVID-19 era than in the pre-COVID-19 era (57.9% vs. 30.6%, p=0.021). Refusal of surgery was associated with old age (67.7±14.5 vs. 52.4±19.1, p<0.001), marital status (married, 84.8% vs. 61.0%, p=0.037), unemployment (42.4% vs. 68.3%, p=0.034), COVID-19 era (66.7% vs. 39.0%, p=0.021), and lower Glasgow coma scale scores (6.12±3.08 vs. 10.6±3.80, p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that refusal of surgery was independently associated with old age (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.084; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.030–1.140; p=0.002), COVID-19 era (adjusted OR, 6.869; 95% CI, 1.624–29.054; p=0.009), and lower Glasgow coma scale scores (adjusted OR, 0.694; 95% CI, 0.568–0.848; p<0.001).

Conclusion

We observed an increased prevalence of head injuries in pediatric patients (<3 years) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, among patients with severe head injuries requiring surgery, more patients refused to undergo surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Simple, Quick, and Safe Dural Incision Technique for Patients with Expected Brain Bulging during Decompressive Craniectomy: "Crank-shaped Dural Incisions"

Brain bulging is an unfavorable outcome in patients with brain swelling who require decompressive craniectomy (DC) to control elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Although several previous studies have described methods for reducing the operation time during DC in these patients, few have proposed a technique for controlling brain protrusion. Here we describe an effective and simple method for external reduction of ICP and discuss its suitability for patients at risk of brain bulging during DC. After craniectomy, crank-shaped lines extending from a central square dural canopy are all marked on the dura. As the incisions are made, pressure from the swelling brain opens the lines and the protruding cortical surface forms dural windows. The square canopy gradually rotates as it stretches, and along with the remaining dura, functions to gently support and compress the cortex. In the case of insufficient decompression, the incision lines can be extended to further reduce ICP. As the parenchyma is accessible to the surgeon, hematoma removal can be performed through the dural windows. In initial experience of four patients who underwent this technique, ICP was controlled in all cases after surgery and no adverse events occurred. The crank-shaped dural incision method is a simple, quick, and effective technique for external reduction of ICP in patients at risk of brain bulging that is intuitive in the emergency situation and thus can be performed even by relatively inexperienced neurosurgeons.

Contraindications to the Initiation of Veno-Venous ECMO for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure in Adults: A Systematic Review and Practical Approach Based on the Current Literature

(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for acute respiratory failure with few absolute but many relative contraindications. The provider in charge often has a difficult time weighing indications and contraindications to anticipate if the patient will benefit from this treatment, a decision that often decides life and death for the patient. To assist in this process in coming to a good evidence-based decision, we reviewed the available literature. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review through a literature search of the MEDLINE database of former and current absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. (3) Results: The following relative and absolute contraindications were identified in the literature: absolute-refusal of the use of extracorporeal techniques by the patient, advanced stage of cancer, fatal intracerebral hemorrhage/cerebral herniation/intractable intracranial hypertension, irreversible destruction of the lung parenchyma without the possibility of transplantation, and contraindications to lung transplantation; relative-advanced age, immunosuppressed patients/pharmacological immunosuppression, injurious ventilator settings > 7 days, right-heart failure, hematologic malignancies, especially bone marrow transplantation and graft-versus-host disease, SAPS II score ≥ 60 points, SOFA score > 12 points, PRESERVE score ≥ 5 points, RESP score ≤ -2 points, PRESET score ≥ 6 points, and "do not attempt resuscitation" order (DN(A)R status). (4) Conclusions: We provide a simple-to-follow algorithm that incorporates absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. This algorithm attempts to weigh pros and cons regarding the benefit for an individual patient and hopefully assists caregivers to make better, informed decisions.