1
|
Kelley AT, Incze MA, Baumgartner M, Campbell ANC, Nunes EV, Scharfstein DO. Predictors of urine toxicology and other biologic specimen missingness in randomized trials of substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 261:111368. [PMID: 38896944 PMCID: PMC11405181 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High levels of missing outcome data for biologically confirmed substance use (BCSU) threaten the validity of substance use disorder (SUD) clinical trials. Underlying attributes of clinical trials could explain BCSU missingness and identify targets for improved trial design. METHODS We reviewed 21 clinical trials funded by the NIDA National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) and published from 2005 to 2018 that examined pharmacologic and psychosocial interventions for SUD. We used configurational analysis-a Boolean algebra approach that identifies an attribute or combination of attributes predictive of an outcome-to identify trial design features and participant characteristics associated with high levels of BCSU missingness. Associations were identified by configuration complexity, consistency, coverage, and robustness. We limited results using a consistency threshold of 0.75 and summarized model fit using the product of consistency and coverage. RESULTS For trial design features, the final solution consisted of two pathways: psychosocial treatment as a trial intervention OR larger trial arm size (complexity=2, consistency=0.79, coverage=0.93, robustness score=0.71). For participant characteristics, the final solution consisted of two pathways: interventions targeting individuals with poly- or nonspecific substance use OR younger age (complexity=2, consistency=0.75, coverage=0.86, robustness score=1.00). CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial treatments, larger trial arm size, interventions targeting individuals with poly- or nonspecific substance use, and younger age among trial participants were predictive of missing BCSU data in SUD clinical trials. Interventions to mitigate missing data that focus on these attributes may reduce threats to validity and improve utility of SUD clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Taylor Kelley
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Vulnerable Veteran Patient-Aligned Care Team, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Michael A Incze
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Greater Intermountain Node, National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trial Network, Program of Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Aimee N C Campbell
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward V Nunes
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel O Scharfstein
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Varley CD, Lowy E, Cartwright EJ, Morgan TR, Ross DB, Rozenberg-Ben-Dror K, Beste LA, Maier MM. Success of the US Veterans Health Administration's Hepatitis C Virus Care Continuum in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:1571-1579. [PMID: 38279939 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimated hepatitis C prevalence within the Veterans Health Administration is higher than the general population and is a risk factor for advanced liver disease and subsequent complications. We describe the hepatitis C care continuum within the Veterans Health Administration 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. METHODS We included individuals in Veterans Health Administration care 2021-2022 who were eligible for direct-acting antiviral treatment 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. We evaluated the proportion of Veterans who progressed through each step of the hepatitis C care continuum, and identified factors associated with initiating direct-acting antivirals, achieving sustained virologic response, and repeat hepatitis C viremia. RESULTS We identified 133 732 Veterans with hepatitis C viremia. Hepatitis C treatment was initiated in 107 134 (80.1%), with sustained virologic response achieved in 98 136 (91.6%). In those who achieved sustained virologic response, 1097 (1.1%) had repeat viremia and 579 (52.8%) were retreated for hepatitis C. Veterans of younger ages were less likely to initiate treatment and achieve sustained virologic response, and more likely to have repeat viremia. Stimulant use and unstable housing were negatively associated with each step of the hepatitis C care continuum. CONCLUSIONS The Veterans Health Administration has treated 80% of Veterans with hepatitis C in care 2021-2022 and achieved sustained virologic response in more than 90% of those treated. Repeat viremia is rare and is associated with younger age, unstable housing, opioid use, and stimulant use. Ongoing efforts are needed to reach younger Veterans, and Veterans with unstable housing or substance use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara D Varley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elliott Lowy
- Health Systems Research, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Emily J Cartwright
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Medicine, Veteran Affairs Atlanta Health Care System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Timothy R Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| | - David B Ross
- Department of Veterans Affairs, HIV, Hepatitis, and Public Health Pathogens Programs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Lauren A Beste
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Marissa M Maier
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Infectious Diseases Section, Veteran Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duan Y, Wang J, Lanham HJ, Berta W, Chamberlain SA, Hoben M, Choroschun K, Iaconi A, Song Y, Perez JS, Shrestha S, Beeber A, Anderson RA, Hayduk L, Cummings GG, Norton PG, Estabrooks CA. How context links to best practice use in long-term care homes: a mixed methods study. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:63. [PMID: 38849909 PMCID: PMC11157780 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00600-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Context (work environment) plays a crucial role in implementing evidence-based best practices within health care settings. Context is multi-faceted and its complex relationship with best practice use by care aides in long-term care (LTC) homes are understudied. This study used an innovative approach to investigate how context elements interrelate and influence best practice use by LTC care aides. METHODS In this secondary analysis study, we combined coincidence analysis (a configurational comparative method) and qualitative analysis to examine data collected through the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program. Coincidence analysis of clinical microsystem (care unit)-level data aggregated from a survey of 1,506 care aides across 36 Canadian LTC homes identified configurations (paths) of context elements linked consistently to care aides' best practices use, measured with a scale of conceptual research use (CRU). Qualitative analysis of ethnographic case study data from 3 LTC homes (co-occurring with the survey) further informed interpretation of the configurations. RESULTS Three paths led to very high CRU at the care unit level: very high leadership; frequent use of educational materials; or a combination of very high social capital (teamwork) and frequent communication between care aides and clinical educators or specialists. Conversely, 2 paths led to very low CRU, consisting of 3 context elements related to unfavorable conditions in relationships, resources, and formal learning opportunities. Our qualitative analysis provided insights into how specific context elements served as facilitators or barriers for best practices. This qualitative exploration was especially helpful in understanding 2 of the paths, illustrating the pivotal role of leadership and the function of teamwork in mitigating the negative impact of time constraints. CONCLUSIONS Our study deepens understanding of the complex interrelationships between context elements and their impact on the implementation of best practices in LTC homes. The findings underscore that there is no singular, universal bundle of context-related elements that enhance or hinder best practice use in LTC homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinfei Duan
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Jing Wang
- Nursing Department, College of Health and Human Services, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Holly J Lanham
- Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthias Hoben
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alba Iaconi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yuting Song
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Janelle Santos Perez
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shovana Shrestha
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anna Beeber
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ruth A Anderson
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Leslie Hayduk
- Sociology Department, Faculty of Arts, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Greta G Cummings
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Peter G Norton
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dodge J, Sullivan K, Miech E, Clomax A, Riviere L, Castro C. Exploring the Social Determinants of Mental Health by Race and Ethnicity in Army Wives. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024; 11:669-684. [PMID: 36952121 PMCID: PMC10933139 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01551-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the social determinants of mental health (SDoMH) by race/ethnicity in a sample with equal access to healthcare. Using an adaptation of the World Health Organization's SDoMH Framework, this secondary analysis examines the socio-economic factors that make up the SDoMH by race/ethnicity. METHOD This paper employed configurational comparative methods (CCMs) to analyze various racial/ethnic subsets from quantitative survey data from (N = 327) active-duty Army wives. Data was collected in 2012 by Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. RESULTS Initial exploratory analysis revealed the highest-scoring factors for each racial/ethnic subgroup: non-Hispanic Black: employment and a history of adverse childhood events (ACEs); Hispanic: living off post and a recent childbirth; junior enlisted non-Hispanic White: high work-family conflict and ACEs; non-Hispanic other race: high work-family conflict and not having a military history. Final analysis showed four models consistently explained clinically significant depression symptoms and four models consistently explained the absence of clinical depression symptoms, providing a solution for each racial/ethnic minority group (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, junior enlisted non-Hispanic White, and non-Hispanic other). DISCUSSION These findings highlight that Army wives are not a monolithic group, despite their collective exposure to military-specific stressors. These findings also highlight the potential for applying configurational approaches to gain new insights into mental health outcomes for social science and clinical researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Dodge
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Kathrine Sullivan
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Edward Miech
- Regenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, 1101 W 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Adriane Clomax
- Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans and Military Families, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, 669 West 34th Street, Suite 201D, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Lyndon Riviere
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA
| | - Carl Castro
- Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans and Military Families, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, 669 West 34th Street, Suite 201D, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akerstrom M, Severin J, Miech EJ, Wikström E, Roczniewska M. Reducing sickness absence among public-sector healthcare employees: the difference-making roles of managerial and employee participation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2024; 97:341-351. [PMID: 38409534 PMCID: PMC10944807 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-024-02048-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluations of organizational-level interventions to prevent work-related illness have identified enabling factors, but knowledge of necessary and sufficient conditions for intervention success is needed. The aim was to identify difference-making factors that distinguish intervention groups with and without a positive intervention effect on sickness absence. METHODS An organizational-level intervention designed to decrease sickness absence by providing support from process facilitators was implemented at eight healthcare workplaces in Sweden between 2017 and 2018. We applied coincidence analysis (CNA) to analyze 34 factors and determine which factors were necessary and sufficient for a successful implementation of tailored interventional measures on an organizational level (dichotomous) and reduced sickness absence (trichotomous). RESULTS Two factors perfectly explained both the presence and absence of a successful implementation: "a high sense of urgency" and "good anchoring and participation from the strategic management". The presence of either of these factors alone was sufficient for successful implementation, whereas the joint absence of both conditions was necessary and sufficient for the absence of successful implementation and an intervention effect. In addition, high employee participation was both necessary and sufficient for a high intervention effect. For organizations without high employee participation, successful implementation led to a medium-effect size. CONCLUSIONS This study identified participation as a difference-maker in the implementation process. Participation from different stakeholders turned out to be important in different phases. When implementing organizational-level interventions, high participation from both strategic management and employees appears to be crucial in terms of the intervention's effect on sickness absence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Akerstrom
- Region Västra Götaland, Institute of Stress Medicine, Carl Skottbergs Gata 22B, 413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - J Severin
- Region Västra Götaland, Institute of Stress Medicine, Carl Skottbergs Gata 22B, 413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E J Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - E Wikström
- Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Roczniewska
- Procome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Sopot, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Preddie AK, Donnelly CE, Miech EJ, Myers LJ, Williams LS, Damush TM. Coming back for more: factors linked to higher participation among Veterans with chronic pain in an innovative VA-YMCA wellness clinic. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002523. [PMID: 38286565 PMCID: PMC10826581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
In 2019, the Indianapolis VA developed a Wellness Clinic in partnership with the Young Men's Christian Associations (YMCA) to comprehensively address Veterans' chronic pain. Our specific aims were twofold: (1) to evaluate the implementation of the Veterans Health Indiana (VHI) Wellness Clinic on patient utilisation and (2) to evaluate patient functioning.We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation, which included the extraction of VA administrative data to identify a patient cohort; the conduct of chart review to extract clinic utilisation, clinical outcomes collected during pain-related healthcare services and comorbidities; and semistructured interviews with Veteran patients who used the VHI Wellness Clinic in different patterns to identify challenges and facilitators to clinic utilisation. We applied configurational analysis to a Veteran sample who had their first visit to the VHI Wellness Clinic in March/April 2019 to pinpoint difference-making factors linked to Veterans' successful participation.The cohort included 312 Veterans (83% male), mean age of 55.4 years. The configurational model included six factors: participation in physical therapy, pain psychology or pain education sessions (22%); presence of any 'no-shows' (57% had 0); history of depression (39%) and clinic referral source (51% self-referred from primary care). The model consisted of four different pathways to successful participation, explaining 60% of cases in the higher-participation group with 86% consistency. Patient outcomes after clinic utilisation demonstrated a significant reduction in self-reported pain and pain catastrophising across time. Moreover, patients reported distance to clinic as both a facilitator and challenge.This mixed-methods analysis identified specific biopsychosocial factors and clinical services directly linked to higher Veteran participation in a new VA-YMCA Wellness Clinic. The VHI Wellness Clinic embedded within a YMCA facility is a feasible and efficacious healthcare delivery model for primary care patients experiencing chronic pain. Additional marketing to clinical providers for referrals and to patients to extend its reach is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaina K Preddie
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Claire E Donnelly
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Edward J Miech
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Laura J Myers
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Linda S Williams
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Teresa M Damush
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Expanding Expertise Through E-health Network Development (EXTEND) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service CIN 13-416, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lovero KL, Kemp CG, Wagenaar BH, Giusto A, Greene MC, Powell BJ, Proctor EK. Application of the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies to health intervention implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2023; 18:56. [PMID: 37904218 PMCID: PMC10617067 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01310-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project developed a compilation of implementation strategies that are intended to standardize reporting and evaluation. Little is known about the application of ERIC in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically reviewed the literature on the use and specification of ERIC strategies for health intervention implementation in LMICs to identify gaps and inform future research. METHODS We searched peer-reviewed articles published through March 2023 in any language that (1) were conducted in an LMIC and (2) cited seminal ERIC articles or (3) mentioned ERIC in the title or abstract. Two co-authors independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, then abstracted study, intervention, and implementation strategy characteristics of included studies. RESULTS The final sample included 60 studies describing research from all world regions, with over 30% published in the final year of our review period. Most studies took place in healthcare settings (n = 52, 86.7%), while 11 (18.2%) took place in community settings and four (6.7%) at the policy level. Across studies, 548 distinct implementation strategies were identified with a median of six strategies (range 1-46 strategies) included in each study. Most studies (n = 32, 53.3%) explicitly matched implementation strategies used for the ERIC compilation. Among those that did, 64 (87.3%) of the 73 ERIC strategies were represented. Many of the strategies not cited included those that target systems- or policy-level barriers. Nearly 85% of strategies included some component of strategy specification, though most only included specification of their action (75.2%), actor (57.3%), and action target (60.8%). A minority of studies employed randomized trials or high-quality quasi-experimental designs; only one study evaluated implementation strategy effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS While ERIC use in LMICs is rapidly growing, its application has not been consistent nor commonly used to test strategy effectiveness. Research in LMICs must better specify strategies and evaluate their impact on outcomes. Moreover, strategies that are tested need to be better specified, so they may be compared across contexts. Finally, strategies targeting policy-, systems-, and community-level determinants should be further explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42021268374.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L Lovero
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Christopher G Kemp
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bradley H Wagenaar
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Giusto
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Claire Greene
- Program On Forced Migration and Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School, Center for Mental Health Services Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Center for Dissemination & Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Enola K Proctor
- Brown School, Center for Mental Health Services Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Center for Dissemination & Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piotrowski A, Coenen J, Rupietta C, Basten J, Muth C, Söling S, Zimmer V, Karbach U, Kellermann-Mühlhoff P, Köberlein-Neu J. Factors facilitating the implementation of a clinical decision support system in primary care practices: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1161. [PMID: 37884934 PMCID: PMC10605331 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10156-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how to implement innovations in primary care practices is key to improve primary health care. Aiming to contribute to this understanding, we investigate the implementation of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) as part of the innovation fund project AdAM (01NVF16006). Originating from complexity theory, the practice change and development model (PCD) proposes several interdependent factors that enable organizational-level change and thus accounts for the complex settings of primary care practices. Leveraging the PCD, we seek to answer the following research questions: Which combinations of internal and external factors based on the PCD contribute to successful implementation in primary care practices? Given these results, how can implementation in the primary care setting be improved? METHODS We analyzed the joint contributions of internal and external factors on implementation success using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). QCA is a set-theoretic approach that allows to identify configurations of multiple factors that lead to one outcome (here: successful implementation of a CDSS in primary care practices). Using survey data, we conducted our analysis based on a sample of 224 primary care practices. RESULTS We identified two configurations of internal and external factors that likewise enable successful implementation. The first configuration enables implementation based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivation, High Capability for Development, and Strong Outside Motivation; the second configuration based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivators, Many Options for Development and the absence of High Capability for Development. CONCLUSION In line with the PCD, our results demonstrate the importance of the combination of internal and external factors for implementation outcomes. Moreover, the two identified configurations show that different ways exist to achieve successful implementation in primary care practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION AdAM was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03430336 ) on February 6, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Piotrowski
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
- Chair of General Practice II and Patient-Centeredness in Primary Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
| | - Jana Coenen
- Jackstädt Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Christian Rupietta
- Jackstädt Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
- Queen's Business School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Jale Basten
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Muth
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sara Söling
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Viola Zimmer
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Ute Karbach
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knott CL, Miech EJ, Woodard N, Huq M. The role of organizational capacity in intervention efficacy in a church-based cancer education program: A configurational analysis. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2023; 3:284-294. [PMID: 38107832 PMCID: PMC10723821 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-023-00089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
It is well-established in the field of implementation science that the context in which an intervention is delivered can play a crucial role in how well it is implemented. However, less is known about how organizational context or capacity relates to efficacy outcomes, particularly with health promotion interventions delivered outside of healthcare settings. The present study examined whether organizational capacity indicators were linked to key efficacy outcomes in an evidence-based cancer control intervention delivered in 13 African American churches in Maryland. Outcomes included increases in colorectal cancer knowledge and self-report colonoscopy screening behavior from baseline to follow-up. We used Coincidence Analysis to identify features of organizational capacity that uniquely distinguished churches with varying levels of cancer knowledge and screening. Indicators of organizational capacity (e.g., congregation size, prior health promotion experience) were from an existing measure of church organizational capacity for health promotion. A single solution pathway accounted for greater increases in colorectal cancer knowledge over 12 months, a combination of two conditions: conducting 3 or more health promotion activities in the prior 2 years together with not receiving any technical assistance from outside partners in the prior 2 years. A single condition accounted for greater increases in colonoscopy screening over 24 months: churches that had conducted health promotion activities in 1-4 different topical areas in the prior 2 years. Findings highlight aspects of organizational capacity (e.g., prior experience in health promotion) that may facilitate intervention efficacy and can help practitioners identify organizational settings most promising for intervention impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl L. Knott
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nathaniel Woodard
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Maisha Huq
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Damush TM, Wilkinson JR, Martin H, Miech EJ, Tang Q, Taylor S, Daggy JK, Bastin G, Islam R, Myers LJ, Penney LS, Narechania A, Schreiber SS, Williams LS. The VA National TeleNeurology Program implementation: a mixed-methods evaluation guided by RE-AIM framework. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1210197. [PMID: 37693238 PMCID: PMC10484508 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1210197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The Veteran Affairs (VA) Office of Rural Health (ORH) funded the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National TeleNeurology Program (NTNP) as an Enterprise-Wide Initiative (EWI). NTNP is an innovative healthcare delivery model designed to fill the patient access gap for outpatient neurological care especially for Veterans residing in rural communities. The specific aim was to apply the RE-AIM framework in a pragmatic evaluation of NTNP services. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective implementation evaluation. Guided by the pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework, we conceptualized a mixed-methods evaluation for key metrics: (1) reach into the Veteran patient population assessed as total NTNP new patient consult volume and total NTNP clinical encounters (new and return); (2) effectiveness through configurational analysis of conditions leading to high Veteran satisfaction and referring providers perceived effectiveness; (3) adoption and implementation by VA sites through site staff and NTNP interviews; (4) implementation success through perceived management, implementation barriers, facilitators, and adaptations and through rapid qualitative analysis of multiple stakeholders' assessments; and (5) maintenance of NTNP through monitoring quarterly TeleNeurology consultation volume. Results NTNP was successfully implemented in 13 VA Medical Centers over 2 years. The total NTNP new patient consult volume in fiscal year 2021 (FY21) was 836 (58% rurally residing); this increased to 1,706 in fiscal year 2022 (FY22) (55% rurally residing). Total (new and follow-up) NTNP clinical encounters were 1,306 in FY21 and 3,730 in FY22. Overall, the sites reported positive experiences with program implementation and perceived that the program was serving Veterans with little access to neurological care. Veterans also reported high satisfaction with the NTNP program. We identified the patient level of perceived excellent teleneurologist-patient communications, reduced need to drive to get care, and that NTNP provided care that the Veteran otherwise could not access as key factors related to high Veteran satisfaction. Conclusions The VA NTNP demonstrated substantial reach, adoption, effectiveness, implementation success, and maintenance over the first 2 years of the program. The NTNP was highly acceptable to both the clinical providers making the referrals and the Veterans receiving the referred video care. The pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework to guide implementation evaluations is appropriate, comprehensive, and recommended for future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa M. Damush
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Jayne R. Wilkinson
- Corporal Michael J Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Holly Martin
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Qing Tang
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Stanley Taylor
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Joanne K. Daggy
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Grace Bastin
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Robin Islam
- Corporal Michael J Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Laura J. Myers
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Lauren S. Penney
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Aditi Narechania
- Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL, United States
- University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Steve S. Schreiber
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Linda S. Williams
- Richard L. Roudebush VAMC HSR&D EXTEND QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dodge JR, Youles B, Caldararo J, Sears ED, Caverly TJ, Michael Ho P, Shimada SL, Kaboli P, Albright K, Robinson SA, McNeal DM, Damschroder L, Saini SD, Adams MA. Engaging Operational Partners Is Critical for Successful Implementation of Research Products: a Coincidence Analysis of Access-Related Projects in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:923-930. [PMID: 37340262 PMCID: PMC10356702 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research into practice remains challenging. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation. DESIGN We conducted a portfolio review of recent VHA-funded or supported projects (1/2015-7/2020) focused on healthcare access ("Access Portfolio"). We then identified projects with implementable research deliverables by excluding those that (1) were non-research/operational projects; (2) were only recently completed (i.e., completed on or after 1/1/2020, meaning that they were unlikely to have had time to be implemented); and (3) did not propose an implementable deliverable. An electronic survey assessed each project's implementation status and elicited barriers/facilitators to implementing deliverables. Results were analyzed using novel Coincidence Analysis (CNA) methods. PARTICIPANTS/KEY RESULTS Among 286 Access Portfolio projects, 36 projects led by 32 investigators across 20 VHA facilities were included. Twenty-nine respondents completed the survey for 32 projects (response rate = 88.9%). Twenty-eight percent of projects reported fully implementing project deliverables, 34% reported partially implementing deliverables, and 37% reported not implementing any deliverables (i.e., resulting tool/intervention not implemented into practice). Of 14 possible barriers/facilitators assessed in the survey, two were identified through CNA as "difference-makers" to partial or full implementation of project deliverables: (1) engagement with national VHA operational leadership; (2) support and commitment from local site operational leadership. CONCLUSIONS These findings empirically highlight the importance of operational leadership engagement for successful implementation of research deliverables. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national operational leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research findings into clinical practice remains challenging, both within and outside VHA. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation. Only two factors were identified as "difference-makers" to adoption of project findings into practice: (1) engagement with national VHA leadership or (2) support and commitment from local site leadership. These findings highlight the importance of leadership engagement for successful implementation of research findings. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Dodge
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bradley Youles
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Caldararo
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Erika D Sears
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tanner J Caverly
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephanie L Shimada
- VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Peter Kaboli
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Karen Albright
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephanie A Robinson
- VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Demetria M McNeal
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura Damschroder
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan A Adams
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Piper KN, Anderson KM, Kokubun CW, Sheth AN, Sales J. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand the conditions that produce successful PrEP implementation in family planning clinics. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:64. [PMID: 37296455 PMCID: PMC10251711 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00450-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Title X-funded family planning clinics have been identified as optimal sites for delivery of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention to U.S. women. However, PrEP has not been widely integrated into family planning services, especially in the Southern U.S., and data suggest there may be significant implementation challenges in this setting. METHODS To understand contextual factors that are key to successful PrEP implementation in family planning clinics, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with key informants from 38 family planning clinics (11 clinics prescribed PrEP and 27 did not). Interviews were guided by constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to uncover the configurations of CFIR factors that led to PrEP implementation. RESULTS We identified 3 distinct construct configurations, or pathways, that led to successful PrEP implementation: (1) high "Leadership Engagement" AND high "Available Resources"; OR (2) high "Leadership Engagement" AND NOT located in the Southeast region; OR (3) high "Access to Knowledge and Information" AND NOT located in the Southeast region. Additionally, there were 2 solution paths that led to absence of PrEP implementation: (1) low "Access to Knowledge and Information" AND low "Leadership Engagement"; OR (2) low "Available Resources" AND high "External Partnerships". DISCUSSION We identified the most salient combinations of co-occurring organizational barriers or facilitators associated with PrEP implementation across Title X clinics in the Southern U.S. We discuss implementation strategies to promote pathways that led to implementation success, as well as strategies to overcome pathways to implementation failure. Notably, we identified regional differences in the pathways that led to PrEP implementation, with Southeastern clinics facing the most obstacles to implementation, specifically substantial resource constraints. Identifying implementation pathways is an important first step for packaging multiple implementation strategies that could be employed by state-level Title X grantees to help scale up PrEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin N Piper
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | | - Anandi N Sheth
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica Sales
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adejumo AC, Yakovchenko V, Morgan TR, Spoutz P, Chia L, Bajaj JS, Chang MF, Dominitz JA, Rogal SS. The road to pandemic recovery: Tracking COVID-19's impact on cirrhosis care and outcomes among 111,558 Veterans. Hepatology 2023; 77:2016-2029. [PMID: 36705024 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS This study aimed to evaluate quarterly trends in process and health outcomes among Veterans with cirrhosis and assess the factors associated with cirrhosis outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. APPROACH RESULTS US Veterans with cirrhosis were identified using the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. Quarterly measures were evaluated from September 30, 2018, through March 31, 2022, including twice yearly screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC-6), new HCC, surveillance for or treatment of esophageal varices, variceal bleeding, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality. Joinpoint analyses were used to assess the changes in trends over time. Logistic regression models were used to identify the demographic and medical factors associated with each outcome over time. Among 111,558 Veterans with cirrhosis with a mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium of 11±5, rates of HCC-6 sharply declined from a prepandemic peak of 41%, to a nadir of 28%, and rebounded to 36% by March 2022. All-cause mortality did not significantly change over the pandemic, but new HCC diagnosis, EVST, variceal bleeding, and all-cause hospitalization significantly declined over follow-up. Quarterly HCC diagnosis declined from 0.49% to 0.38%, EVST from 50% to 41%, variceal bleeding from 0.15% to 0.11%, and hospitalization from 9% to 5%. Rurality became newly, significantly associated with nonscreening over the pandemic (aOR for HCC-6=0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.86; aOR for EVST=0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.997). CONCLUSIONS The pandemic continues to impact cirrhosis care. Identifying populations at the highest risk of care disruptions may help to address ongoing areas of need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeyinka C Adejumo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy R Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| | - Patrick Spoutz
- Pharmacy Benefits Management, Veterans Integrated Service Network 20, Vancouver, Washington, USA
| | - Linda Chia
- Pharmacy Benefits Management, Veterans Integrated Service Network 8, Bay Pines, Florida, USA
| | - Jasmohan S Bajaj
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- VA Richmond Health Care System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael F Chang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shari S Rogal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yakovchenko V, Chinman MJ, Lamorte C, Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Merante M, Gibson S, Neely B, Morgan TR, Rogal SS. Refining Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategy surveys using cognitive interviews with frontline providers. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:42. [PMID: 37085937 PMCID: PMC10122282 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00409-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation includes 73 defined implementation strategies clustered into nine content areas. This taxonomy has been used to track implementation strategies over time using surveys. This study aimed to improve the ERIC survey using cognitive interviews with non-implementation scientist clinicians. METHODS Starting in 2015, we developed and fielded annual ERIC surveys to evaluate liver care in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). We invited providers who had completed at least three surveys to participate in cognitive interviews (October 2020 to October 2021). Before the interviews, participants reviewed the complete 73-item ERIC survey and marked which strategies were unclear due to wording, conceptual confusion, or overlap with other strategies. They then engaged in semi-structured cognitive interviews to describe the experience of completing the survey and elaborate on which strategies required further clarification. RESULTS Twelve VA providers completed surveys followed by cognitive interviews. The "Engage Consumer" and "Support Clinicians" clusters were rated most highly in terms of conceptual and wording clarity. In contrast, the "Financial" cluster had the most wording and conceptual confusion. The "Adapt and Tailor to Context" cluster strategies were considered to have the most redundancy. Providers outlined ways in which the strategies could be clearer in terms of wording (32%), conceptual clarity (51%), and clarifying the distinction between strategies (51%). CONCLUSIONS Cognitive interviews with ERIC survey participants allowed us to identify and address issues with strategy wording, combine conceptually indistinct strategies, and disaggregate multi-barreled strategies. Improvements made to the ERIC survey based on these findings will ultimately assist VA and other institutions in designing, evaluating, and replicating quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
| | - Matthew J. Chinman
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Carolyn Lamorte
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Center for Dissemination & Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
| | - Thomas J. Waltz
- Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI USA
| | - Monica Merante
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
| | - Sandra Gibson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Brittney Neely
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
| | - Timothy R. Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Shari S. Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Building 30, Room 2A113, University Drive C (151C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001 USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Charns MP, Lerner B, Yakovchenko V, Urech TH, Shin MH, Kim B, Engle RL, Vashi AA. Achieving transformation to lean management systems in health care. Health Serv Res 2023; 58:343-355. [PMID: 36129687 PMCID: PMC10012231 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand what factors and organizational dynamics enable Lean transformation of health care organizations. DATA SOURCES Primary data were collected through two waves of interviews in 2016-2017 with leaders and staff at seven veterans affairs medical centers participating in Lean enterprise transformation. STUDY DESIGN Using an observational study design, for each site we coded and rated seven potential enablers of transformation. The outcome measure was the extent of Lean transformation, constructed by coding and rating 11 markers of depth and spread of transformation. Using multivalue coincidence analysis (CNA), we identified enablers that distinguished among sites having different levels of transformation. We identified representative quotes for the enablers. DATA COLLECTION METHODS We interviewed 121 executive leaders, middle managers, expert consultants, systems redesign staff, frontline supervisors, and staff. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Two sites achieved high Lean transformation, three medium, and two low. Together leadership support and capability development were sufficient for the three-level Lean transformation outcomes with 100% consistency and 100% coverage. High scores on both corresponded to high Lean transformation; medium on either one corresponded to medium transformation; and low on both corresponded to low transformation. Additionally, low scores in communication and availability of data and very low scores in alignment characterized low-transformation sites. Sites with high leadership support also had a high veteran engagement. CONCLUSIONS This multisite study develops a novel measure of the extent of organization-wide Lean transformation and uses CNA to identify enablers linked to transformation. It provides insights into why and how some organizations are more successful at transformation than others. Findings support the applicability of the organization transformation model that guided the study and highlight the roles of executive leadership and capability development in the dynamics of transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P. Charns
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & ManagementBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Barbara Lerner
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Health Equity and Research Promotion (CHERP)VA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Tracy H. Urech
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i)VA Palo Alto Healthcare SystemMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marlena H. Shin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Bo Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ryann L. Engle
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Anita A. Vashi
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i)VA Palo Alto Healthcare SystemMenlo ParkCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Affiliated)Stanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baumgartner M, Falk C. Configurational Causal Modeling and Logic Regression. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH 2023; 58:292-310. [PMID: 34596499 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1971510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Configurational comparative methods (CCMs) and logic regression methods (LRMs) are two families of exploratory methods that employ very different techniques to analyze data generated by causal structures featuring conjunctural causation and equifinality. Aiming for the same by different means carries a substantive synergy potential, which, however, remains untapped so far because representatives of the two frameworks know little of each other. The purpose of this article is to change that. We first level the field for readers from both backgrounds by providing brief introductions to the basic ideas behind CCMs and LRMs. Then, we carve out the strengths and weaknesses of the two method families by benchmarking their performance when applied to binary data under a variety of different discovery contexts. It turns out that CCMs and LRMs have complementary strengths and weaknesses. This creates various promising avenues for cross-validation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roczniewska M, Rogala A, Marszałek M, Hasson H, Bakker AB, von Thiele Schwarz U. Job crafting interventions: what works, for whom, why, and in which contexts? Research protocol for a systematic review with coincidence analysis. Syst Rev 2023; 12:10. [PMID: 36670492 PMCID: PMC9857908 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02170-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent challenges in the working world that resulted from the pandemic and technological advances have underlined the importance of flexibility in how jobs are designed. Job crafting (JC) refers to self-initiated changes that employees introduce to their jobs to optimize their job design and increase the fit between the job and their needs and preferences. These behaviors can be stimulated by job crafting training interventions, which aim to change how individual employees design, organize, or manage their work. However, since the interventions are implemented in various ways, we do not know which context and intervention factors are necessary or sufficient to achieve desired outcomes. Without this knowledge, benefitting from the potential of job crafting interventions is limited. The overall aim of this project will be to investigate what combinations of context, intervention, and mechanism factors are linked with effective JC interventions. Specifically, we will detect what factors are minimally sufficient and/or necessary to produce a successful JC intervention, how they combine, as well as what are the multiple alternative paths to their success. METHODS We will perform a systematic review of the JC interventions literature combined with coincidence analysis (CNA). We will search electronic databases of journals and utilize Rayyan software to make decisions regarding inclusion. Data regarding context (e.g., fit), intervention (e.g., types of activities), mechanisms (e.g., intention implementation), and outcomes (e.g., employee well-being, job performance) will be extracted using a pre-piloted form and coded into a crisp-set (factor present vs. absent). Analyses will be carried out using the CNA package in R. DISCUSSION This review will address gaps in knowledge about the context, intervention, and mechanism-related factors that may impact the effects of JC interventions. Consequently, this review will help develop a program theory for JC interventions that explains what works, how and under which circumstances. Applying CNA to synthesize these complex solutions across multiple studies provides an innovative method that may be used in future review attempts evaluating the implementation of interventions. Finally, our synthesis will provide knowledge relevant to organizational practitioners and scholars who want to implement JC interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://osf.io/2g6yx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Roczniewska
- PROCOME Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Faculty of Psychology in Sopot, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot, Poland
| | - Anna Rogala
- Faculty of Psychology in Warsaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Marszałek
- Faculty of Psychology in Sopot, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot, Poland
| | - Henna Hasson
- PROCOME Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arnold B. Bakker
- Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
- PROCOME Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yakovchenko V, Rogal SS, Goodrich DE, Lamorte C, Neely B, Merante M, Gibson S, Scott D, McCurdy H, Nobbe A, Morgan TR, Chinman MJ. Getting to implementation: Adaptation of an implementation playbook. Front Public Health 2023; 10:980958. [PMID: 36684876 PMCID: PMC9853037 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Implementation strategies supporting the translation of evidence into practice need to be tailored and adapted for maximum effectiveness, yet the field of adapting implementation strategies remains nascent. We aimed to adapt "Getting To Outcomes"® (GTO), a 10-step implementation playbook designed to help community-based organizations plan and evaluate behavioral health programs, into "Getting To Implementation" (GTI) to support the selection, tailoring, and use of implementation strategies in health care settings. Methods Our embedded evaluation team partnered with operations, external facilitators, and site implementers to employ participatory methods to co-design and adapt GTO for Veterans Health Administration (VA) outpatient cirrhosis care improvement. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidenced-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) guided documentation and analysis of changes made pre- and post-implementation of GTI at 12 VA medical centers. Data from multiple sources (interviews, observation, content analysis, and fidelity tracking) were triangulated and analyzed using rapid techniques over a 3-year period. Results Adaptations during pre-implementation were planned, proactive, and focused on context and content to improve acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the GTI playbook. Modifications during and after implementation were unplanned and reactive, concentrating on adoption, fidelity, and sustainability. All changes were collaboratively developed, fidelity consistent at the level of the facilitator and/or implementer. Conclusion GTO was initially adapted to GTI to support health care teams' selection and use of implementation strategies for improving guideline-concordant medical care. GTI required ongoing modification, particularly in steps regarding team building, context assessment, strategy selection, and sustainability due to difficulties with step clarity and progression. This work also highlights the challenges in pragmatic approaches to collecting and synthesizing implementation, fidelity, and adaptation data. Trial registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04178096).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Shari S. Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - David E. Goodrich
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Carolyn Lamorte
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Brittney Neely
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Monica Merante
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Sandra Gibson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Dawn Scott
- Department of Medicine, Central Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Temple, TX, United States
| | - Heather McCurdy
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Anna Nobbe
- Digestive Disease Section, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Timothy R. Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Matthew J. Chinman
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rattray NA, Miech EJ, True G, Natividad D, Laws B, Frankel RM, Kukla M. Modeling Contingency in Veteran Community Reintegration: A Mixed Methods Approach. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH 2023; 17:70-92. [PMID: 36523449 PMCID: PMC9742921 DOI: 10.1177/15586898211059616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Researchers need approaches for analyzing complex phenomena when assessing contingency relationships where specific conditions explain an outcome only when combined with other conditions. Using a mixed methods design, we paired configurational methods and qualitative thematic analysis to model contingency in veteran community reintegration outcomes, identifying combinations of conditions that led to success or lack of success in community reintegration among US military veterans. This pairing allowed for modeling contingency at a detailed level beyond the capabilities of either approach alone. Our analysis revealed multiple contingent relationships at work in explaining reintegration, including social support, purpose, cultural adjustment, and military separation experiences. This study contributes to the field of mixed methods by pairing a mathematical cross-case method with a qualitative method to model contingency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A. Rattray
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine,
institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Indiana University School of
Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Regenstrief Institute, Inc,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine,
institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Indiana University School of
Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Regenstrief Institute, Inc,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gala True
- South Central MIRECC Southeast Louisiana
Veterans Health Care System, New
Orleans, LA, USA
- Section of Community and Population
Medicine, Louisiana
State University School of Medicine,
New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Diana Natividad
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brian Laws
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard M. Frankel
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine,
institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Indiana University School of
Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- institution-id-type="Ringgold" />Regenstrief Institute, Inc,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marina Kukla
- Roudebush VA Medical Center,
Center for
Health Information and Communication
(CHIC), Indianapolis, IN, USA
- institution-id-type="Ringgold" />IUPUI Department of Psychology,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sprang G, Miech EJ, Gusler S. The role of secondary traumatic stress breakthrough champions in reducing worker trauma and improving organizational health using a configurational analysis approach. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2023; 4:26334895231164582. [PMID: 37091534 PMCID: PMC10061637 DOI: 10.1177/26334895231164582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging research has demonstrated that organizational efforts at becoming secondary traumatic stress (STS)-informed can improve the overall well-being of the workforce, especially when implementation activity by a champion team is high. Questions remain, however, regarding the mechanisms that enable these improvements. Method This study uses configurational analysis to determine necessary and sufficient conditions to produce reductions in STS symptoms in workers as well as organizational improvements toward being more STS-informed in a cohort survey of 6,033 professionals working with individuals exposed to trauma representing 52 organizations. The Secondary Traumatic Stress Informed Organizational Assessment (STSI-OA) was used to measure professional's perceptions of how well the unit addressed secondary trauma in the workplace, and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS) assessed traumatic stress symptoms in respondents. Champions' activity was scored using the categories suggested by Shea. Results For the STSS outcome, either a STSI-OA positive increase of 10 or more points or high levels of champion problem-solving were independently sufficient for an improvement in the outcome. The STSI-OA model had two pathways: high levels of peer engagement via the scaling up of innovations using PDSAs or the combination of facilitation of peer knowledge and skills together with working in a child welfare organization. Either pathway was sufficient by itself to yield the STSI-OA outcome. Conclusions Identifying and cultivating the champions' use of problem-solving and peer engagement strategies can transform the threat posed by indirect trauma exposure into an opportunity for shared experience and healing. Plain Language Summary Organizational champions are individuals or teams that strive to promote change within their workplace. These champions are integral to spreading innovative ideas and strategies and creating organization-wide changes ( Powell et al., 2015). However, little is known about the processes or specific strategies that make champions successful. One area in which champions are needed is in improving organizations' response to and understanding of secondary traumatic stress (STS), among those in helping professions that are indirectly exposed to trauma through the traumatic stories of those they work with. In fact, research has shown that organizational efforts to address STS improve the well-being of individual professionals within that organization ( Sprang et al., 2021). The present study sought to better understand what champion-related processes or conditions led to organizational change in addressing the effects of indirect exposure and improving symptoms related to STS. Results showed that organizational change in addressing STS and champions' problem-solving strategies resulted in reductions in individual professionals' STS symptoms. Furthermore, champions' use of peer engagement or sharing of knowledge among peers in child welfare settings led to improvements at an organizational level. These results show that organization-level change can have a direct impact on individual well-being and there are specific champion activities that can promote this change. Specifically, results demonstrate a need to identify and support champions' use of problem-solving and peer engagement strategies to turn the individual and organizational threat posed by indirect trauma into an opportunity for shared healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ginny Sprang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Trauma and Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Edward J. Miech
- William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Stephanie Gusler
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Trauma and Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thiem A, Mkrtchyan L, Sebechlebská Z. Combinational Regularity Analysis (CORA) - a new method for uncovering complex causation in medical and health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:333. [PMID: 36564706 PMCID: PMC9784266 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01800-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern configurational comparative methods (CCMs) of causal inference, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Coincidence Analysis (CNA), have started to make inroads into medical and health research over the last decade. At the same time, these methods remain unable to process data on multi-morbidity, a situation in which at least two chronic conditions are simultaneously present. Such data require the capability to analyze complex effects. Against a background of fast-growing numbers of patients with multi-morbid diagnoses, we present a new member of the family of CCMs with which multiple conditions and their complex conjunctions can be analyzed: Combinational Regularity Analysis (CORA). METHODS The technical heart of CORA consists of algorithms that have originally been developed in electrical engineering for the analysis of multi-output switching circuits. We have adapted these algorithms for purposes of configurational data analysis. To demonstrate CORA, we provide several example applications, both with simulated and empirical data, by means of the eponymous software package CORA. Also included in CORA is the possibility to mine configurational data and to visualize results via logic diagrams. RESULTS For simple single-condition analyses, CORA's solution is identical with that of QCA or CNA. However, analyses of multiple conditions with CORA differ in important respects from analyses with QCA or CNA. Most importantly, CORA is presently the only configurational method able to simultaneously explain individual conditions as well as complex conjunctions of conditions. CONCLUSIONS Through CORA, problems of multi-morbidity in particular, and configurational analyses of complex effects in general, come into the analytical reach of CCMs. Future research aims to further broaden and enhance CORA's capabilities for refining such analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alrik Thiem
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Lusine Mkrtchyan
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Zuzana Sebechlebská
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sperber NR, Miech EJ, Clary AS, Perry K, Edwards-Orr M, Rudolph JL, Van Houtven CH, Thomas KS. Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care. HEALTHCARE (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2022; 10:100653. [PMID: 36108526 PMCID: PMC10174078 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veteran Directed Care (VDC) aims to keep Veterans at risk for nursing home placement in their communities. VA medical centers (VAMCs) purchase VDC from third-party organizational providers who then partner with them during implementation. Experiences with VDC implementation have varied. OBJECTIVES We sought to identify conditions differentiating partnerships with higher enrollment (implementation success). METHODS We conducted a case-based study with: qualitative data on implementation determinants two and eight months after program start, directed content analysis to assign numerical scores (-2 strong barrier to +2 strong facilitator), and mathematical modeling using Coincidence Analysis (CNA) to identify key determinants of implementation success. Cases consisted of VAMCs and partnering non-VAMC organizations who started VDC during 2017 or 2018. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis. RESULTS Eleven individual organizations within five partnerships constituted our sample. Two CFIR determinants- Networks & Communication and External Change Agent-uniquely and consistently identified implementation success. At an inter-organizational partnership level, Networks & Communications and External Change Agent +2 (i.e., present as strong facilitators) were both necessary and sufficient. At a within-organization level, Networks & Communication +2 was necessary but not sufficient for the non-VAMC providers, whereas External Change Agent +2 was necessary and sufficient for VAMCs. CONCLUSION Networks & Communication and External Change Agent played difference-making roles in inter-organizational implementation success, which differ by type of organization and level of analysis. IMPLICATIONS This multi-level approach identified crucial difference-making conditions for inter-organizational implementation success when putting a program into practice requires partnerships across multiple organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sperber
- Center to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, USA; Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, USA.
| | - Edward J Miech
- VA EXTEND QUERI, VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Perry
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, USA
| | | | - James L Rudolph
- Brown University School of Public Health, USA; Providence VA Medical Center, USA
| | - Courtney Harold Van Houtven
- Center to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, USA; Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, USA
| | - Kali S Thomas
- Brown University School of Public Health, USA; Providence VA Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Haque LY, Fiellin DA, Tate JP, Esserman D, Bhattacharya D, Butt AA, Crystal S, Edelman EJ, Gordon AJ, Lim JK, Tetrault JM, Williams EC, Bryant K, Cartwright EJ, Rentsch CT, Justice AC, Lo Re V, McGinnis KA. Association Between Alcohol Use Disorder and Receipt of Direct-Acting Antiviral Hepatitis C Virus Treatment. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2246604. [PMID: 36515952 PMCID: PMC9856353 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with lower mortality and is effective in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, despite recommendations, patients with AUD may be less likely to receive DAAs. Objective To assess the association between alcohol use and receipt of DAA treatment among patients with HCV within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included 133 753 patients with HCV born from 1945 to 1965 who had completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire and had at least 1 outpatient visit in the VHA from January 1, 2014, through May 31, 2017, with maximal follow-up of 3 years until May 31, 2020; DAA receipt; or death, whichever occurred first. Exposures Alcohol use categories generated using responses to the AUDIT-C questionnaire and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses: current AUD, abstinent with AUD history, at-risk drinking, lower-risk drinking, and abstinent without AUD history. Demographic, other clinical, and pharmacy data were also collected. Main Outcomes and Measures Associations between alcohol use categories and DAA receipt within 1 and 3 years estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by calendar year. Results Of 133 753 patients (130 103 men [97%]; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [4.5] years; and 73 493 White patients [55%]), 38% had current AUD, 12% were abstinent with a history of AUD, 6% reported at-risk drinking, 14% reported lower-risk drinking, and 30% were abstinent without a history of AUD. Receipt of DAA treatment within 1 year was 7%, 33%, 53%, and 56% for patients entering the cohort in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. For patients entering in 2014, those with current AUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95%, CI, 0.66-0.77]) or who were abstinent with an AUD history (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-1.00]) were less likely to receive DAA treatment within 1 year compared with patients with lower-risk drinking. For those entering in 2015-2017, patients with current AUD (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.81]) and those who were abstinent with an AUD history (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68-0.86]) were less likely to receive DAA treatment within 1 year compared with patients with lower-risk drinking. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study suggests that individuals with AUD, regardless of abstinence, were less likely to receive DAA treatment. Improved access to DAA treatment for persons with AUD is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamia Y. Haque
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David A. Fiellin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Janet P. Tate
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven
| | - Denise Esserman
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Debika Bhattacharya
- Department of Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Adeel A. Butt
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Center for Health Services Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - E. Jennifer Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Joseph K. Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeanette M. Tetrault
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Emily C. Williams
- Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Kendall Bryant
- HIV/AIDS and Alcohol Research Program, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Emily J. Cartwright
- Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Veterans Affairs Atlanta Health Care System, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christopher T. Rentsch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amy C. Justice
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven
| | - Vincent Lo Re
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Damschroder LJ, Miech EJ, Freitag MB, Evans R, Burns JA, Raffa SD, Goldstein MG, Annis A, Spohr SA, Wiitala WL. Facility-level program components leading to population impact: a coincidence analysis of obesity treatment options within the Veterans Health Administration. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:1029-1037. [PMID: 36408955 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity is a well-established risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. Comprehensive lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery are three effective treatment approaches for obesity. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) offers all three domains but in different configurations across medical facilities. Study aim was to explore the relationship between configurations of three types of obesity treatments, context, and population impact across VHA using coincidence analysis. This was a cross-sectional analysis of survey data describing weight management treatment components linked with administrative data to compute population impact for each facility. Coincidence analysis was used to identify combinations of treatment components that led to higher population impact. Facilities with higher impact were in the top two quintiles for (1) reach to eligible patients and (2) weight outcomes. Sixty-nine facilities were included in the analyses. The final model explained 88% (29/33) of the higher-impact facilities with 91% consistency (29/32) and was comprised of five distinct pathways. Each of the five pathways depended on facility complexity-level plus factors from one or more of the three domains of weight management: comprehensive lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, and/or bariatric surgery. Three pathways include components from multiple treatment domains. Combinations of conditions formed "recipes" that lead to higher population impact. Our coincidence analyses highlighted both the importance of local context and how combinations of specific conditions consistently and uniquely distinguished higher impact facilities from lower impact facilities for weight management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Damschroder
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA MIDAS QUERI Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Edward J Miech
- Veterans Affairs Center for Health Information & Communication, VA EXTEND QUERI, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Michelle B Freitag
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA MIDAS QUERI Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Richard Evans
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA MIDAS QUERI Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer A Burns
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA MIDAS QUERI Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Susan D Raffa
- National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael G Goldstein
- National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ann Annis
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Stephanie A Spohr
- National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wyndy L Wiitala
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA MIDAS QUERI Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ziemann A, Sibley A, Tuvey S, Robens S, Scarbrough H. Identifying core strategies and mechanisms for spreading a national medicines optimisation programme across England-a mixed-method study applying qualitative thematic analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:116. [PMID: 36309709 PMCID: PMC9617223 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00364-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Achieving widespread adoption of innovations across health systems remains a challenge. Past efforts have focused on identifying and classifying strategies to actively support innovation spread (replicating an innovation across sites), but we lack an understanding about the mechanisms which such strategies draw on to deliver successful spread outcomes. There is also no established methodology to identify core strategies or mechanisms which could be replicated with fidelity in new contexts when spreading innovations. We aimed to understand which strategies and mechanisms are connected with successful spread using the case of a national medicines optimisation programme in England. Methods The study applied a comparative mixed-method case study approach. We compared spread activity in 15 Academic Health Science Networks (AHSN) in England, applied to one innovation case, Transfers of Care Around Medicines (TCAM). We followed two methodological steps: (1) qualitative thematic analysis of primary data collected from 18 interviews with AHSN staff members to identify the strategies and mechanisms and related contextual determinants and (2) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) combining secondary quantitative data on spread outcome and qualitative themes from step 1 to identify the core strategies and mechanisms. Results We identified six common spread strategy-mechanism constructs that AHSNs applied to spread the TCAM national spread programme: (1) the unique intermediary position of the AHSN as “honest broker” and local networking organisation, (2) the right capacity and position of the spread facilitator, (3) an intersectoral and integrated stakeholder engagement approach, (4) the dynamic marriage of the innovation with local health and care system needs and characteristics, (5) the generation of local evidence, and (6) the timing of TCAM. The QCA resulted in the core strategy/mechanism of a timely start into the national spread programme in combination with the employment of a local, senior pharmacist as an AHSN spread facilitator. Conclusions By qualitatively comparing experiences of spreading one innovation across different contexts, we identified common strategies, causal mechanisms, and contextual determinants. The QCA identified one core combination of two strategies/mechanisms. The identification of core strategies/mechanisms and common pre-conditional and mediating contextual determinants of a specific innovation offers spread facilitators and implementers a priority list for tailoring spread activities. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00364-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Ziemann
- grid.28577.3f0000 0004 1936 8497Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK ,grid.7340.00000 0001 2162 1699Department for Social & Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Building 3 East, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Andrew Sibley
- grid.501216.1Wessex Academic Health Science Network, 2 Venture Road, Southampton, SO16 7NP UK
| | - Sam Tuvey
- South West Academic Health Science Network, Vantage Point, Pynes Hill, Exeter, EX2 5FD UK
| | - Sarah Robens
- South West Academic Health Science Network, Vantage Point, Pynes Hill, Exeter, EX2 5FD UK ,Re!nstitute, Six Landmark Square, Suite 400, Stamford, CT 06901 USA
| | - Harry Scarbrough
- grid.28577.3f0000 0004 1936 8497Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK ,grid.28577.3f0000 0004 1936 8497Bayes Business School, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ingvarsson S, Hasson H, von Thiele Schwarz U, Nilsen P, Powell BJ, Lindberg C, Augustsson H. Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review. Implement Sci 2022; 17:73. [PMID: 36303219 PMCID: PMC9615304 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of low-value care (LVC) is a persistent problem that calls for knowledge about strategies for de-implementation. However, studies are dispersed across many clinical fields, and there is no overview of strategies that can be used to support the de-implementation of LVC. The extent to which strategies used for implementation are also used in de-implementing LVC is unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to (1) identify strategies for the de-implementation of LVC described in the scientific literature and (2) compare de-implementation strategies to implementation strategies as specified in the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) and strategies added by Perry et al. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted according to recommendations outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. Four scientific databases were searched, relevant articles were snowball searched, and the journal Implementation Science was searched manually for peer-reviewed journal articles in English. Articles were included if they were empirical studies of strategies designed to reduce the use of LVC. Two reviewers conducted all abstract and full-text reviews, and conflicting decisions were discussed until consensus was reached. Data were charted using a piloted data-charting form. The strategies were first coded inductively and then mapped onto the ERIC compilation of implementation strategies. RESULTS The scoping review identified a total of 71 unique de-implementation strategies described in the literature. Of these, 62 strategies could be mapped onto ERIC strategies, and four strategies onto one added category. Half (50%) of the 73 ERIC implementation strategies were used for de-implementation purposes. Five identified de-implementation strategies could not be mapped onto any of the existing strategies in ERIC. CONCLUSIONS Similar strategies are used for de-implementation and implementation. However, only a half of the implementation strategies included in the ERIC compilation were represented in the de-implementation studies, which may imply that some strategies are being underused or that they are not applicable for de-implementation purposes. The strategies assess and redesign workflow (a strategy previously suggested to be added to ERIC), accountability tool, and communication tool (unique new strategies for de-implementation) could complement the existing ERIC compilation when used for de-implementation purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ingvarsson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
| | - Henna Hasson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- Unit for implementation and evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Public Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
| | - Clara Lindberg
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
| | - Hanna Augustsson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- Unit for implementation and evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sperber NR, Cragun D, Roberts MC, Bendz LM, Ince P, Gonzales S, Haga SB, Wu RR, Petry NJ, Ramsey L, Uber R. A Mixed-Methods Protocol to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Clinical Settings. J Pers Med 2022; 12:1313. [PMID: 36013262 PMCID: PMC9410119 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Using a patient's genetic information to inform medication prescriptions can be clinically effective; however, the practice has not been widely implemented. Health systems need guidance on how to engage with providers to improve pharmacogenetic test utilization. Approaches from the field of implementation science may shed light on the complex factors affecting pharmacogenetic test use in real-world settings and areas to target to improve utilization. This paper presents an approach to studying the application of precision medicine that utilizes mixed qualitative and quantitative methods and implementation science frameworks to understand which factors or combinations consistently account for high versus low utilization of pharmocogenetic testing. This approach involves two phases: (1) collection of qualitative and quantitative data from providers-the cases-at four clinical institutions about their experiences with, and utilization of, pharmacogenetic testing to identify salient factors; and (2) analysis using a Configurational Comparative Method (CCM), using a mathematical algorithm to identify the minimally necessary and sufficient factors that distinguish providers who have higher utilization from those with low utilization. Advantages of this approach are that it can be used for small to moderate sample sizes, and it accounts for conditions found in real-world settings by demonstrating how they coincide to affect utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R. Sperber
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Megan C. Roberts
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Lisa M. Bendz
- Center for Medication Policy and Drug Information, Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Parker Ince
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Sarah Gonzales
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Susanne B. Haga
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - R. Ryanne Wu
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Natasha J. Petry
- School of Pharmacy, North Dakota State University/Sanford Health Imagenetics, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
| | - Laura Ramsey
- Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology and Research in Patient Services, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Ryley Uber
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, CA 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Womack DM, Miech EJ, Fox NJ, Silvey LC, Somerville AM, Eldredge DH, Steege LM. Coincidence Analysis: A Novel Approach to Modeling Nurses' Workplace Experience. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:794-802. [PMID: 36044917 PMCID: PMC9433166 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to identify combinations of workplace conditions that uniquely differentiate high, medium, and low registered nurse (RN) ratings of appropriateness of patient assignment during daytime intensive care unit (ICU) work shifts. METHODS A collective case study design and coincidence analysis were employed to identify combinations of workplace conditions that link directly to high, medium, and low RN perception of appropriateness of patient assignment at a mid-shift time point. RN members of the study team hypothesized a set of 55 workplace conditions as potential difference makers through the application of theoretical and empirical knowledge. Conditions were derived from data exported from electronic systems commonly used in nursing care. RESULTS Analysis of 64 cases (25 high, 24 medium, and 15 low) produced three models, one for each level of the outcome. Each model contained multiple pathways to the same outcome. The model for "high" appropriateness was the simplest model with two paths to the outcome and a shared condition across pathways. The first path comprised of the absence of overtime and a before-noon patient discharge or transfer, and the second path comprised of the absence of overtime and RN assignment to a single ICU patient. CONCLUSION Specific combinations of workplace conditions uniquely distinguish RN perception of appropriateness of patient assignment at a mid-shift time point, and these difference-making conditions provide a foundation for enhanced observability of nurses' work experience during hospital work shifts. This study illuminates the complexity of assessing nursing work system status by revealing that multiple paths, comprised of multiple conditions, can lead to the same outcome. Operational decision support tools may best reflect the complex adaptive nature of the work systems they intend to support by utilizing methods that accommodate both causal complexity and equifinality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M. Womack
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | | | - Nicholas J. Fox
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Linus C. Silvey
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Anna M. Somerville
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Deborah H. Eldredge
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Linsey M. Steege
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yakovchenko V, Morgan TR, Miech EJ, Neely B, Lamorte C, Gibson S, Beste LA, McCurdy H, Scott D, Gonzalez R, Park A, Powell BJ, Bajaj JS, Dominitz JA, Chartier M, Ross D, Chinman MJ, Rogal SS. Core implementation strategies for improving cirrhosis care in the Veterans Health Administration. Hepatology 2022; 76:404-417. [PMID: 35124820 PMCID: PMC9288973 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides care for more than 80,000 veterans with cirrhosis. This longitudinal, multimethod evaluation of a cirrhosis care quality improvement program aimed to (1) identify implementation strategies associated with evidence-based, guideline-concordant cirrhosis care over time, and (2) use qualitative interviews to operationalize strategies for a manualized intervention. APPROACH AND RESULTS VHA providers were surveyed annually about the use of 73 implementation strategies to improve cirrhosis care in fiscal years 2018 (FY18) and 2019 (FY19). Implementation strategies linked to guideline-concordant cirrhosis care were identified using bivariate statistics and comparative configurational methods. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 facilities in the highest quartile of cirrhosis care to specify the successful implementation strategies and their mechanisms of change. A total of 106 VHA facilities (82%) responded at least once over the 2-year period (FY18, n = 63; FY19, n = 100). Facilities reported using a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 20) implementation strategies in FY18 and 10 (IQR 19) in FY19. Of the 73 strategies, 35 (48%) were positively correlated with provision of evidence-based cirrhosis care. Configurational analysis identified multiple strategy pathways directly linked to more guideline-concordant cirrhosis care. Across both methods, a subset of eight strategies was determined to be core to cirrhosis care improvement and specified using qualitative interviews. CONCLUSIONS In a national cirrhosis care improvement initiative, a multimethod approach identified a core subset of successful implementation strategy combinations. This process of empirically identifying and specifying implementation strategies may be applicable to other implementation challenges in hepatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA
| | - Timothy R. Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Roudebush VA Medical Center, HSR&D Center for Health Information & Communication, VA PRIS-M QUERI, Indianapolis, IN,Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Brittney Neely
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Carolyn Lamorte
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sandra Gibson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lauren A. Beste
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA,General Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Dawn Scott
- Department of Medicine, Central Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Temple, TX
| | - Rachel Gonzalez
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Sierra Pacific Veterans Integrated Service Network, Pharmacy Benefits Management, Mather, CA
| | - Angela Park
- Office of Healthcare Transformation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jasmohan S. Bajaj
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA,Division of Gastroenterology, Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Richmond, VA
| | - Jason A. Dominitz
- Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Maggie Chartier
- HIV, Hepatitis, and Related Conditions Programs, Office of Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - David Ross
- HIV, Hepatitis, and Related Conditions Programs, Office of Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Matthew J. Chinman
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA,RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Shari S. Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gertner AK, Clare HM, Powell BJ, Gilbert AR, Jones HE, Silberman P, Shea CM, Domino ME. A mixed methods study of provider factors in buprenorphine treatment retention. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 105:103715. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Gwayi-Chore MC, Aruldas K, Avokpaho E, Chirambo CM, Kaliappan SP, Houngbégnon P, Togbevi CI, Chabi F, Nindi P, Simwanza J, Johnson J, Miech EJ, Kalua K, Ibikounlé M, Ajjampur SSR, Weiner BJ, Walson JL, Means AR. Defining optimal implementation packages for delivering community-wide mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths with high coverage. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:792. [PMID: 35717193 PMCID: PMC9206125 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08080-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence suggests that community-wide mass drug administration (MDA) may interrupt the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths (STH), a group of intestinal worms that infect 1.5 billion individuals globally. Although current operational guidelines provide best practices for effective MDA delivery, they do not describe which activities are most essential for achieving high coverage or how they work together to produce effective intervention delivery. We aimed to identify the various packages of influential intervention delivery activities that result in high coverage of community-wide MDA for STH in Benin, India, and Malawi. METHODS We applied coincidence analysis (CNA), a novel cross-case analytical method, to process mapping data as part of the implementation science research of the DeWorm3 Project, a Hybrid Type 1 cluster randomized controlled trial assessing the feasibility of interrupting the transmission of STH using bi-annual community-wide MDA in Benin, India, and Malawi. Our analysis aimed to identify any necessary and/or sufficient combinations of intervention delivery activities (i.e., implementation pathways) that resulted in high MDA coverage. Activities were related to drug supply chain, implementer training, community sensitization strategy, intervention duration, and implementation context. We used pooled implementation data from three sites and six intervention rounds, with study clusters serving as analytical cases (N = 360). Secondary analyses assessed differences in pathways across sites and over intervention rounds. RESULTS Across all three sites and six intervention rounds, efficient duration of MDA delivery (within ten days) singularly emerged as a common and fundamental component for achieving high MDA coverage when combined with other particular activities, including a conducive implementation context, early arrival of albendazole before the planned start of MDA, or a flexible community sensitization strategy. No individual activity proved sufficient by itself for producing high MDA coverage. We observed four possible overall models that could explain effective MDA delivery strategies, all which included efficient duration of MDA delivery as an integral component. CONCLUSION Efficient duration of MDA delivery uniquely stood out as a highly influential implementation activity for producing high coverage of community-wide MDA for STH. Effective MDA delivery can be achieved with flexible implementation strategies that include various combinations of influential intervention components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
- The DeWorm3 Project, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Kumudha Aruldas
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Félicien Chabi
- Institut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
| | - Providence Nindi
- Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach (BICO), Lions Sight First Eye Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - James Simwanza
- Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach (BICO), Lions Sight First Eye Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jabaselvi Johnson
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Edward J Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Khumbo Kalua
- Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach (BICO), Lions Sight First Eye Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
- Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Moudachirou Ibikounlé
- Institut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
- Centre de Recherche pour la Lutte Contre les Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin
| | - Sitara S R Ajjampur
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Bryan J Weiner
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Judd L Walson
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- The DeWorm3 Project, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics, & Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Arianna Rubin Means
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- The DeWorm3 Project, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miech EJ, Perkins AJ, Zhang Y, Myers LJ, Sico JJ, Daggy J, Bravata DM. Pairing regression and configurational analysis in health services research: modelling outcomes in an observational cohort using a split-sample design. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061469. [PMID: 35672067 PMCID: PMC9174826 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Configurational methods are increasingly being used in health services research. OBJECTIVES To use configurational analysis and logistic regression within a single data set to compare results from the two methods. DESIGN Secondary analysis of an observational cohort; a split-sample design involved randomly dividing patients into training and validation samples. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Patients who had a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in US Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. MEASURES The patient outcome was the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or recurrent ischaemic stroke within 1 year post-TIA. The quality-of-care outcome was the without-fail rate (proportion of patients who received all processes for which they were eligible, among seven processes). RESULTS For the recurrent stroke or death outcome, configurational analysis yielded a three-pathway model identifying a set of (validation sample) patients where the prevalence was 15.0% (83/552), substantially higher than the overall sample prevalence of 11.0% (relative difference, 36%). The configurational model had a sensitivity (coverage) of 84.7% and specificity of 40.6%. The logistic regression model identified six factors associated with the combined endpoint (c-statistic, 0.632; sensitivity, 63.3%; specificity, 63.1%). None of these factors were elements of the configurational model. For the quality outcome, configurational analysis yielded a single-pathway model identifying a set of (validation sample) patients where the without-fail rate was 64.3% (231/359), nearly twice the overall sample prevalence (33.7%). The configurational model had a sensitivity (coverage) of 77.3% and specificity of 78.2%. The logistic regression model identified seven factors associated with the without-fail rate (c-statistic, 0.822; sensitivity, 80.3%; specificity, 84.2%). Two of these factors were also identified in the configurational analysis. CONCLUSIONS Configurational analysis and logistic regression represent different methods that can enhance our understanding of a data set when paired together. Configurational models optimise sensitivity with relatively few conditions. Logistic regression models discriminate cases from controls and provided inferential relationships between outcomes and independent variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Miech
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Anthony J Perkins
- Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Laura J Myers
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jason J Sico
- Neurology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joanne Daggy
- Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Dawn M Bravata
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rich JA, Miech EJ, Bilal U, Corbin TJ. How education and racial segregation intersect in neighborhoods with persistently low COVID-19 vaccination rates in Philadelphia. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1044. [PMID: 35614426 PMCID: PMC9130689 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13414-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 infection has disproportionately affected socially disadvantaged neighborhoods. Despite this disproportionate burden of infection, these neighborhoods have also lagged in COVID-19 vaccinations. To date, we have little understanding of the ways that various types of social conditions intersect to explain the complex causes of lower COVID-19 vaccination rates in neighborhoods. METHODS We used configurational comparative methods (CCMs) to study COVID-19 vaccination rates in Philadelphia by neighborhood (proxied by zip code tabulation areas). Specifically, we identified neighborhoods where COVID-19 vaccination rates (per 10,000) were persistently low from March 2021 - May 2021. We then assessed how different combinations of social conditions (pathways) uniquely distinguished neighborhoods with persistently low vaccination rates from the other neighborhoods in the city. Social conditions included measures of economic inequities, racial segregation, education, overcrowding, service employment, public transit use, health insurance and limited English proficiency. RESULTS Two factors consistently distinguished neighborhoods with persistently low COVID-19 vaccination rates from the others: college education and concentrated racial privilege. Two factor values together - low college education AND low/medium concentrated racial privilege - identified persistently low COVID-19 vaccination rates in neighborhoods, with high consistency (0.92) and high coverage (0.86). Different values for education and concentrated racial privilege - medium/high college education OR high concentrated racial privilege - were each sufficient by themselves to explain neighborhoods where COVID-19 vaccination rates were not persistently low, likewise with high consistency (0.93) and high coverage (0.97). CONCLUSIONS Pairing CCMs with geospatial mapping can help identify complex relationships between social conditions linked to low COVID-19 vaccination rates. Understanding how neighborhood conditions combine to create inequities in communities could inform the design of interventions tailored to address COVID-19 vaccination disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Rich
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Center for Nonviolence and Social Justice, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 1505 Race Street, MS 1047, 6th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA.
| | - Edward J Miech
- Regenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Usama Bilal
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3600 Market St. Suite 730, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Theodore J Corbin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1750 W. Harrison Street, Suite 108 Kellogg, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mulrooney M, Smith M, Sobieraj D, Shipley B, Miech E. Factors Influencing Primary Care Organization Commitment to Technical Assistance Services for Clinical Pharmacist Integration Using Configurational Comparative Methods. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2022; 62:1564-1571. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Davis MM, Schneider JL, Petrik AF, Miech EJ, Younger B, Escaron AL, Rivelli JS, Thompson JH, Nyongesa D, Coronado GD. Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:123-129. [PMID: 35346927 PMCID: PMC8959740 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs can facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We sought to identify modifiable, clinic-level factors that distinguish primary care clinics with higher vs lower FIT completion rates in response to a centralized mailed FIT program. METHODS We used baseline observational data from 15 clinics within a single urban federally qualified health center participating in a pragmatic trial to optimize a mailed FIT program. Clinic-level data included interviews with leadership using a guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and FIT completion rates. We used template analysis to identify explanatory factors and configurational comparative methods to identify specific combinations of clinic-level conditions that uniquely distinguished clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. RESULTS We interviewed 39 clinic leaders and identified 58 potential explanatory factors representing clinic workflows and the CFIR inner setting domain. Clinic-level FIT completion rates ranged from 30% to 56%. The configurational model for clinics with higher rates (≥37%) featured any 1 of the following 3 factors related to support staff: (1) adding back- or front-office staff in past 12 months, (2) having staff help patients resolve barriers to CRC screening, and (3) having staff hand out FITs/educate patients. The model for clinics with lower rates involved the combined absence of these same 3 factors. CONCLUSIONS Three factors related to support staff differentiated clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. Adding nonphysician support staff and having those staff provide enabling services might help clinics optimize mailed FIT screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Department of Family Medicine, and School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Edward J Miech
- Regenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brittany Younger
- AltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anne L Escaron
- AltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer S Rivelli
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jamie H Thompson
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Denis Nyongesa
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Knott CL, Miech EJ, Slade J, Woodard N, Robinson-Shaneman BJ, Huq M. Evaluation of organizational capacity in the implementation of a church-based cancer education program. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2022; 2:22-33. [PMID: 35392361 PMCID: PMC8983006 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-021-00033-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Implementation evaluations have increasingly taken into account how features of local context help determine implementation outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine which contextual features of organizational capacity led directly to the RE-AIM Framework implementation outcomes of intervention reach and number of days taken to implement, in an implementation trial of a series of cancer education workshops conducted across 13 African American churches in Maryland. We used a configurational approach with Coincidence Analysis to identify specific features of organizational capacity that uniquely distinguished churches with implementation success from those that were less successful. Aspects of organizational capacity (e.g., congregation size, staffing/volunteers, health ministry experience) were drawn from an existing measure of church organizational capacity for health promotion. Solution pathways leading to higher intervention reach included: having a health ministry in place for 1-4 years; or having fewer than 100 members; or mid-size churches that had conducted health promotion activities in 1-4 different topics in the past 2 years. Solution pathways to implementing the intervention in fewer number of days included: having conducted 1-2 health promotion activities in the past 2 years; or having 1-5 part-time staff and a pastor without additional outside employment; or churches with a doctorally prepared pastor and a weekly attendance of 101-249 members. Study findings can inform future theory, research, and practice in implementation of evidence-based health promotion interventions delivered in faith-based and other limited-resource community settings. Findings support the important role of organizational capacity in implementation outcomes in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl L. Knott
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.,Corresponding author: Cheryl L. Knott, PhD, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 1234W School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD 20742. Phone: 301-405-6659; Fax: 301-314-9167; ; Twitter: ChampUMD; Tumblr: champlabumd
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jimmie Slade
- Community Ministry of Prince George’s County, PO Box 250, Upper Marlboro, MD 20773, USA
| | - Nathaniel Woodard
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | | | - Maisha Huq
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, 1234 School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Towards a neo-configurational theory of intrinsic motivation. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11031-021-09906-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThis research seeks to improve our understanding of how intrinsic motivation is instantiated. Three motivation theories, flow theory, self-determination theory, and empowerment theory, have informed our understanding of the foundations of intrinsic motivation at work. Taken jointly, they suggest six causal factors for intrinsic motivation: (1) perceived competence, (2) perceived challenge, (3) perceived autonomy, (4) perceived impact, (5) perceived social relatedness, and (6) perceived meaningfulness. Integrating different theoretical perspectives, I employ a case-based configurational approach and conduct coincidence analyses on survey data from a German public utility to analyse the nuanced interplay of these six causal factors for intrinsic motivation. My data show that high perceived meaningfulness or high perceived autonomy is sufficient for high perceived intrinsic motivation and at least one of the two conditions must be present. Further, my findings reveal a common cause structure in which perceived impact is not a causal factor for intrinsic motivation but an additional outcome factor. Subsequent analyses shed light on possible roles of the remaining proposed causal factors by drawing a tentative causal chain structure. The results of this study enhance our understanding of the causal complexity underlying the formation of intrinsic motivation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Polk DE, Guerrero EG, Gruß I, Shah NH, Yosuf NM, Dawson T, Kaplan CD, Pihlstrom DJ, Fellows JL. Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:96. [PMID: 34454637 PMCID: PMC8401236 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00199-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends dental providers apply dental sealants to the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars for the prevention or treatment of non-cavitated dental caries. Despite the evidence-based support for this guideline, adherence among general dentists is low, ranging from less than 5 to 38.5%. Thus, an evidence-to-practice gap exists, and it is unclear which implementation strategies would best support providers in adopting and implementing the evidence-based practice. One potential approach to selecting and tailoring implementation strategies is a deliberative loop process, a stakeholder-engaged approach to decision-making. This trial aims to test the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of using a deliberative loop intervention with stakeholders (i.e., providers and staff) to enable managers to select implementation strategies that facilitate the adoption of an evidence-based dental practice. METHODS Sixteen dental clinics within Kaiser Permanente Northwest Dental will be cluster randomized to determine the timing of receiving the intervention in this stepped-wedge trial. In the three-part deliberative loop intervention, clinic stakeholders engage in the following activities: (1) receive background information, (2) participate in facilitated small-group discussions designed to promote learning from each other's lived experiences and develop informed opinions about effective clinic-level implementation strategies, and (3) share their informed opinions with clinic leaders, who may then choose to select and deploy implementation strategies based on the stakeholders' informed opinions. The primary outcome of Reach will be defined as patient-level receipt of guideline-concordant care. Secondary outcomes will include the cost-effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of the deliberative loop process. Implementation strategies deployed will be catalogued over time. DISCUSSION These results will establish the extent to which the deliberative loop process can help leaders select and tailor implementation strategies with the goal of improving guideline-concordant dental care. TRIAL REGISTRATION This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 12/18/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah E Polk
- University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Erick G Guerrero
- Research to End Healthcare Disparities Corp, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inga Gruß
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nilesh H Shah
- University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nadia M Yosuf
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tim Dawson
- The Art of Democracy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gonzalez R, Park A, Yakovchenko V, Rogal S, Chartier M, Morgan TR, Ross D. HCV Elimination in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2021; 18:1-6. [PMID: 34484696 PMCID: PMC8405054 DOI: 10.1002/cld.1150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gonzalez
- Department of Veterans AffairsSierra Pacific Veterans Integrated Service NetworkPharmacy Benefits ManagementMatherCA
| | - Angela Park
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Healthcare TransformationWashingtonDC
| | - Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation ResearchEdith Norse Rogers Memorial VA HospitalBedfordMA
| | - Shari Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and PromotionVA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPittsburghPA,Departments of Medicine and Surgery and Center for Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPA
| | - Maggie Chartier
- Veterans Health AdministrationHIV, Hepatitis, and Related Conditions ProgramsOffice of Specialty Care ServicesWashingtonDC
| | - Timothy R. Morgan
- Gastroenterology SectionVA Long Beach Healthcare SystemLong BeachCA,Department of MedicineDivision of GastroenterologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCA
| | - David Ross
- Veterans Health AdministrationHIV, Hepatitis, and Related Conditions ProgramsOffice of Specialty Care ServicesWashingtonDC
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Miech EJ, Freitag MB, Evans RR, Burns JA, Wiitala WL, Annis A, Raffa SD, Spohr SA, Damschroder LJ. Facility-level conditions leading to higher reach: a configurational analysis of national VA weight management programming. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:797. [PMID: 34380495 PMCID: PMC8359110 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06774-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) MOVE! weight management program is effective in helping patients lose weight and is available at every VHA medical center across the United States, reaching patients to engage them in treatment remains a challenge. Facility-based MOVE! programs vary in structures, processes of programming, and levels of reach, with no single factor explaining variation in reach. Configurational analysis, based on Boolean algebra and set theory, represents a mathematical approach to data analysis well-suited for discerning how conditions interact and identifying multiple pathways leading to the same outcome. We applied configurational analysis to identify facility-level obesity treatment program arrangements that directly linked to higher reach. Methods A national survey was fielded in March 2017 to elicit information about more than 75 different components of obesity treatment programming in all VHA medical centers. This survey data was linked to reach scores available through administrative data. Reach scores were calculated by dividing the total number of Veterans who are candidates for obesity treatment by the number of “new” MOVE! visits in 2017 for each program and then multiplied by 1000. Programs with the top 40 % highest reach scores (n = 51) were compared to those in the lowest 40 % (n = 51). Configurational analysis was applied to identify specific combinations of conditions linked to reach rates. Results One hundred twenty-seven MOVE! program representatives responded to the survey and had complete reach data. The final solution consisted of 5 distinct pathways comprising combinations of program components related to pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, and comprehensive lifestyle intervention; 3 of the 5 pathways depended on the size/complexity of medical center. The 5 pathways explained 78 % (40/51) of the facilities in the higher-reach group with 85 % consistency (40/47). Conclusions Specific combinations of facility-level conditions identified through configurational analysis uniquely distinguished facilities with higher reach from those with lower reach. Solutions demonstrated the importance of how local context plus specific program components linked together to account for a key implementation outcome. These findings will guide system recommendations about optimal program structures to maximize reach to patients who would benefit from obesity treatment such as the MOVE! program. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06774-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Miech
- Veterans Affairs Center for Health Information & Communication, VA EXTEND QUERI, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, USA.
| | - Michelle B Freitag
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Richard R Evans
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Jennifer A Burns
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Wyndy L Wiitala
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Ann Annis
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Susan D Raffa
- National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephanie A Spohr
- National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura J Damschroder
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Torres Diaz A, Lock LJ, Molfenter TD, Mahoney JE, Boss D, Bjelland TD, Liu Y. Implementation for Sustained Impact in Teleophthalmology (I-SITE): applying the NIATx Model for tailored implementation of diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:74. [PMID: 34229748 PMCID: PMC8258481 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00175-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Teleophthalmology provides evidence-based, telehealth diabetic retinopathy screening that is underused even when readily available in primary care clinics. There is an urgent need to increase teleophthalmology use in the US primary care clinics. In this study, we describe the development of a tailored teleophthalmology implementation program and report outcomes related to primary care provider (PCP) adoption. Methods We applied the 5 principles and 10 steps of the NIATx healthcare process improvement model to develop and test I-SITE (Implementation for Sustained Impact in Teleophthalmology) in a rural, the US multi-payer health system. This implementation program allows patients and clinical stakeholders to systematically tailor teleophthalmology implementation to their local context. We aligned I-SITE components and implementation strategies to an updated ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) framework. We compared teleophthalmology adoption between PCPs who did or did not participate in various components of I-SITE. We surveyed PCPs and clinical staff to identify the strategies they believed to have the highest impact on teleophthalmology use. Results To test I-SITE, we initiated a year-long series of 14 meetings with clinical stakeholders (n=22) and met quarterly with patient stakeholders (n=9) in 2017. Clinical and patient stakeholder groups had 90.9% and 88.9% participant retention at 1 year, respectively. The increase in teleophthalmology use was greater among PCPs participating in the I-SITE implementation team than among other PCPs (p < 0.006). The proportion of all PCPs who used the implementation strategy of electing diabetic eye screening for their annual performance-based financial incentive increased from 0% (n=0) at baseline to 56% (n=14) following I-SITE implementation (p = 0.004). PCPs and clinical staff reported the following implementation strategies as having the highest impact on teleophthalmology use: reminders to ask patients about diabetic eye screening during clinic visits, improving electronic health record (EHR) documentation, and patient outreach. Conclusions We applied the NIATx Model to develop and test a teleophthalmology implementation program for tailored integration into primary care clinics. The NIATx Model provides a systematic approach to engaging key stakeholders for tailoring implementation of evidence-based telehealth interventions into their local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Torres Diaz
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 2870 University Ave., Ste. 206, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Loren J Lock
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 2870 University Ave., Ste. 206, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Todd D Molfenter
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jane E Mahoney
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Deanne Boss
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Yao Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 2870 University Ave., Ste. 206, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cohen DJ, Sweeney SM, Miller WL, Hall JD, Miech EJ, Springer RJ, Balasubramanian BA, Damschroder L, Marino M. Improving Smoking and Blood Pressure Outcomes: The Interplay Between Operational Changes and Local Context. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:240-248. [PMID: 34180844 PMCID: PMC8118489 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We undertook a study to identify conditions and operational changes linked to improvements in smoking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes in primary care. METHODS We purposively sampled and interviewed practice staff (eg, office managers, clinicians) from a subset of 104 practices participating in EvidenceNOW-a multisite cardiovascular disease prevention initiative. We calculated Clinical Quality Measure improvements, with targets of 10-point or greater absolute improvements in the proportion of patients with smoking screening and, if relevant, counseling and in the proportion of hypertensive patients with adequately controlled BP. We analyzed interview data to identify operational changes, transforming these into numeric data. We used Configurational Comparative Methods to assess the joint effects of multiple factors on outcomes. RESULTS In clinician-owned practices, implementing a workflow to routinely screen, counsel, and connect patients to smoking cessation resources, or implementing a documentation change or a referral to a resource alone led to an improvement of at least 10 points in the smoking outcome with a moderate level of facilitation support. These patterns did not manifest in health- or hospital system-owned practices or in Federally Qualified Health Centers, however. The BP outcome improved by at least 10 points among solo practices after medical assistants were trained to take an accurate BP. Among larger, clinician-owned practices, BP outcomes improved when practices implemented a second BP measurement when the first was elevated, and when staff learned where to document this information in the electronic health record. With 50 hours or more of facilitation, BP outcomes improved among larger and health- and hospital system-owned practices that implemented these operational changes. CONCLUSIONS There was no magic bullet for improving smoking or BP outcomes. Multiple combinations of operational changes led to improvements, but only in specific contexts of practice size and ownership, or dose of external facilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Cohen
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shannon M Sweeney
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Jennifer D Hall
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Edward J Miech
- Regenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Rachel J Springer
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Laura Damschroder
- Implementation Pathways, LLC and VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Miguel Marino
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:42. [PMID: 33845922 PMCID: PMC8042857 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions. Methods We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017–2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success. Results We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders’ professional values, perception of meeting patients’ needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused. Conclusions Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hickman SE, Miech EJ, Stump TE, Fowler NR, Unroe KT. Identifying the Implementation Conditions Associated With Positive Outcomes in a Successful Nursing Facility Demonstration Project. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2021; 60:1566-1574. [PMID: 32440672 PMCID: PMC7731870 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To identify the implementation barriers, facilitators, and conditions associated with successful outcomes from a clinical demonstration project to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations of long-stay nursing facility residents in 19 Indiana nursing homes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Optimizing Patient Transfers, Impacting Medical quality, Improving Symptoms-Transforming Institutional Care (OPTIMISTIC) is a multicomponent intervention that includes enhanced geriatric care, transition support, and palliative care. The configurational analysis was used to analyze descriptive and quantitative data collected during the project. The primary outcome was reductions in hospitalizations per 1,000 eligible resident days. RESULTS Analysis of barriers, facilitators, and conditions for success yielded a model with 2 solution pathways associated with a 10% reduction in potentially avoidable hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days: (a) lower baseline hospitalization rates and investment of senior management; or (b) turnover by the director of nursing during the observation period. Conditions for success were similar for a 20% reduction, with the addition of increased resident acuity. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Key conditions for successful implementation of the OPTIMISTIC intervention include strong investment by senior leadership and an environment in which baseline hospitalization rates leave ample room for improvement. Turnover in the position of director of nursing also linked to successful implementation; this switch in leadership may represent an opportunity for culture change by bringing in new perspectives and viewpoints. These findings help define the conditions for the successful implementation of the OPTIMISTIC model and have implications for the successful implementation of interventions in the nursing facility more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Hickman
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Incorporated, Indianapolis.,Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Edward J Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute Incorporated, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Nicole R Fowler
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Incorporated, Indianapolis.,Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Kathleen T Unroe
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Incorporated, Indianapolis.,Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Malone S, McKay VR, Krucylak C, Powell BJ, Liu J, Terrill C, Saito JM, Rangel SJ, Newland JG. A cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial to de-implement unnecessary post-operative antibiotics in children: the optimizing perioperative antibiotic in children (OPerAtiC) trial. Implement Sci 2021; 16:29. [PMID: 33741048 PMCID: PMC7980649 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01096-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic-resistant infections have become a public health crisis that is driven by the inappropriate use of antibiotics. In the USA, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) have been established and are required by regulatory agencies to help combat the problem of antibiotic resistance. Post-operative antibiotic use in surgical cases deemed low-risk for infection is an area with significant overuse of antibiotics in children. Consensus among leading public health organizations has led to guidelines eliminating post-operative antibiotics in low-risk surgeries. However, the best strategies to de-implement these inappropriate antibiotics in this setting are unknown. METHODS/DESIGN A 3-year stepped wedge cluster randomized trial will be conducted at nine US Children's Hospitals to assess the impact of two de-implementation strategies, order set change and facilitation training, on inappropriate post-operative antibiotic prescribing in low risk (i.e., clean and clean-contaminated) surgical cases. The facilitation training will amplify order set changes and will involve a 2-day workshop with antibiotic stewardship teams. This training will be led by an implementation scientist expert (VRM) and a pediatric infectious diseases physician with antibiotic stewardship expertise (JGN). The primary clinical outcome will be the percentage of surgical cases receiving unnecessary post-operative antibiotics. Secondary clinical outcomes will include the rate of surgical site infections and the rate of Clostridioides difficile infections, a common negative consequence of antibiotic use. Monthly semi-structured interviews at each hospital will assess the implementation process of the two strategies. The primary implementation outcome is penetration, which will be defined as the number of order sets changed or developed by each hospital during the study. Additional implementation outcomes will include the ASP team members' assessment of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of each strategy while they are being implemented. DISCUSSION This study will provide important information on the impact of two potential strategies to de-implement unnecessary post-operative antibiotic use in children while assessing important clinical outcomes. As more unnecessary medical practices are identified, de-implementation strategies, including facilitation, need to be rigorously evaluated. Along with this study, other rigorously designed studies evaluating additional strategies are needed to further advance the burgeoning field of de-implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04366440. Registered April 28, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04366440 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Malone
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Campus Box 8116, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Virginia R McKay
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christina Krucylak
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Campus Box 8116, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Cindy Terrill
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Campus Box 8116, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Saito
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shawn J Rangel
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MO, USA
| | - Jason G Newland
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Campus Box 8116, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Coury J, Miech EJ, Styer P, Petrik AF, Coates KE, Green BB, Baldwin LM, Shapiro JA, Coronado GD. What's the "secret sauce"? How implementation variation affects the success of colorectal cancer screening outreach. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:5. [PMID: 33431063 PMCID: PMC7802298 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00104-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) programs can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates, but health systems vary how they implement (i.e., adapt) these programs for their organizations. A health insurance plan implemented a mailed FIT program (named BeneFIT), and participating health systems could adapt the program. This multi-method study explored which program adaptations might have resulted in higher screening rates. METHODS First, we conducted a descriptive analysis of CRC screening rates by key health system characteristics and program adaptations. Second, we generated an overall model by fitting a weighted regression line to our data. Third, we applied Configurational Comparative Methods (CCMs) to determine how combinations of conditions were linked to higher screening rates. The main outcome measure was CRC screening rates. RESULTS Seventeen health systems took part in at least 1 year of BeneFIT. The overall screening completion rate was 20% (4-28%) in year 1 and 25% (12-35%) in year 2 of the program. Health systems that used two or more adaptations had higher screening rates, and no single adaptation clearly led to higher screening rates. In year 1, small systems, with just one clinic, that used phone reminders (n = 2) met the implementation success threshold (≥ 19% screening rate) while systems with > 1 clinic were successful when offering a patient incentive (n = 4), scrubbing mailing lists (n = 4), or allowing mailed FIT returns with no other adaptations (n = 1). In year 2, larger systems with 2-4 clinics were successful with a phone reminder (n = 4) or a patient incentive (n = 3). Of the 10 systems that implemented BeneFIT in both years, seven improved their CRC screening rates in year 2. CONCLUSIONS Health systems can choose among many adaptations and successfully implement a health plan's mailed FIT program. Different combinations of adaptations led to success with health system size emerging as an important contextual factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Edward J Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Patricia Styer
- Business Administration, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kelly E Coates
- Quality Improvement Program Administrator, CareOregon, Inc., Portland, OR, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jean A Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Smith JL, Damschroder LJ, Chinman MJ, Proctor EK, Kirchner JE. Consensus on strategies for implementing high priority mental health care practices within the US Department of Veterans Affairs. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 2:26334895211004607. [PMID: 37090006 PMCID: PMC9978675 DOI: 10.1177/26334895211004607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Identifying feasible and effective implementation strategies remains a significant challenge. At present, there is a gap between the number of strategies prospectively included in implementation trials, typically four or fewer, and the number of strategies utilized retrospectively, often 20 or more. This gap points to the need for developing a better understanding of the range of implementation strategies that should be considered in implementation science and practice. Methods This study elicited expert recommendations to identify which of 73 discrete implementation strategies were considered essential for implementing three mental health care high priority practices (HPPs) in the US Department of Veterans Affairs: depression outcome monitoring in primary care mental health (n = 20), prolonged exposure therapy for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 22), and metabolic safety monitoring for patients taking antipsychotic medications (n = 20). Participants had expertise in implementation science, the specific HPP, or both. A highly structured recommendation process was used to obtain recommendations for each HPP. Results Majority consensus was identified for 26 or more strategies as absolutely essential; 53 or more strategies were identified as either likely essential or absolutely essential across the three HPPs. Conclusions The large number of strategies identified as essential starkly contrasts with existing research that largely focuses on application of single strategies to support implementation. Systematic investigation and documentation of multi-strategy implementation initiatives is needed. Plain Language Summary Most implementation studies focus on the impact of a relatively small number of discrete implementation strategies on the uptake of a practice. However, studies that systematically survey providers find that dozens or more discrete implementation strategies can be identified in the context of the implementation initiative. This study engaged experts in implementation science and clinical practice in a structured recommendation process to identify which of the 73 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation strategies were considered absolutely essential, likely essential, likely inessential, and absolutely inessential for each of the three distinct mental health care practices: depression outcome monitoring in primary care, prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder, and metabolic safety monitoring for patients taking antipsychotic medications. The results highlight that experts consider a large number of strategies as absolutely or likely essential for supporting the implementation of mental health care practices. For example, 26 strategies were identified as absolutely essential for all three mental health care practices. Another 27 strategies were identified as either absolutely or likely essential across all three practices. This study points to the need for future studies to document the decision-making process an initiative undergoes to identify which strategies to include and exclude in an implementation effort. In particular, a structured approach to this documentation may be necessary to identify strategies that may be endogenous to a care setting and that may not be otherwise be identified as being "deliberately" used to support a practice or intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Waltz
- Department of Psychology, Eastern
Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School, Washington University in
St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Monica M Matthieu
- HSR&D Center of Innovation Center
for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research, Department of Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR,
USA
- School of Social Work, College for
Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Smith
- VA Quality Enhancement Research
Initiative (QUERI) for Team-Based Behavioral Health, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare
System, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Psychiatric Research Institute and
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,
USA
| | - Laura J Damschroder
- VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical
Management Research and Diabetes QUERI, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor,
MI, USA
| | - Matthew J Chinman
- VISN 4 MIRECC, VA Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA,
USA
| | - Enola K Proctor
- Brown School, Washington University in
St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - JoAnn E Kirchner
- VA Quality Enhancement Research
Initiative (QUERI) for Team-Based Behavioral Health, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare
System, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Psychiatric Research Institute and
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Whitaker RG, Sperber N, Baumgartner M, Thiem A, Cragun D, Damschroder L, Miech EJ, Slade A, Birken S. Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science. Implement Sci 2020; 15:108. [PMID: 33308250 PMCID: PMC7730775 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of multifaceted interventions typically involves many diverse elements working together in interrelated ways, including intervention components, implementation strategies, and features of local context. Given this real-world complexity, implementation researchers may be interested in a new mathematical, cross-case method called Coincidence Analysis (CNA) that has been designed explicitly to support causal inference, answer research questions about combinations of conditions that are minimally necessary or sufficient for an outcome, and identify the possible presence of multiple causal paths to an outcome. CNA can be applied as a standalone method or in conjunction with other approaches and can reveal new empirical findings related to implementation that might otherwise have gone undetected. METHODS We applied CNA to a publicly available dataset from Sweden with county-level data on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaigns and vaccination uptake in 2012 and 2014 and then compared CNA results to the published regression findings. RESULTS The original regression analysis found vaccination uptake was positively associated only with the availability of vaccines in schools. CNA produced different findings and uncovered an additional solution path: high vaccination rates were achieved by either (1) offering the vaccine in all schools or (2) a combination of offering the vaccine in some schools and media coverage. CONCLUSIONS CNA offers a new comparative approach for researchers seeking to understand how implementation conditions work together and link to outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Garr Whitaker
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Nina Sperber
- Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701 USA
| | - Michael Baumgartner
- University of Bergen, Department of Philosophy, Postboks 7805, 5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - Alrik Thiem
- University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, 6002 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Cragun
- Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3802 Spectrum Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Laura Damschroder
- VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 18, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800 USA
| | - Edward J. Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
| | - Alecia Slade
- Avalere Health, 1201 New York Avenue NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005 USA
| | - Sarah Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 525@Vine Room 5219, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Petrik AF, Green B, Schneider J, Miech EJ, Coury J, Retecki S, Coronado GD. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:815-822. [PMID: 33107003 PMCID: PMC7652967 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based programs such as mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can only affect health outcomes if they can be successfully implemented. However, attempts to implement programs are often limited by organizational-level factors. OBJECTIVES As part of the Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) pragmatic trial, we evaluated how organizational factors impacted the extent to which health centers implemented a mailed FIT outreach program. DESIGN Eight health centers participated in STOP CRC. The intervention consisted of customized electronic health record tools and clinical staff training to facilitate mailing of an introduction letter, FIT kit, and reminder letter. Health centers had flexibility in how they delivered the program. MAIN MEASURES We categorized the health centers' level of implementation based on the proportion of eligible patients who were mailed a FIT kit, and applied configurational comparative methods to identify combinations of relevant organizational-level and program-level factors that distinguished among high, medium, and low implementing health centers. The factors were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research model. KEY RESULTS FIT tests were mailed to 21.0-81.7% of eligible participants at each health center. We identified a two-factor solution that distinguished among levels of implementation with 100% consistency and 100% coverage. The factors were having a centralized implementation team (inner setting) and mailing the introduction letter in advance of the FIT kit (intervention characteristics). Health centers with high levels of implementation had the joint presence of both factors. In health centers with medium levels of implementation, only one factor was present. Health centers with low levels of implementation had neither factor present. CONCLUSIONS Full implementation of the STOP CRC intervention relied on a centralized implementation team with dedicated staffing time, and the advance mailing of an introduction letter. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742065 Registered 05 December 2012-Prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Beverly Green
- Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rogal SS, Yakovchenko V, Morgan T, Bajaj JS, Gonzalez R, Park A, Beste L, Miech EJ, Lamorte C, Neely B, Gibson S, Malone PS, Chartier M, Taddei T, Garcia-Tsao G, Powell BJ, Dominitz JA, Ross D, Chinman MJ. Getting to implementation: a protocol for a Hybrid III stepped wedge cluster randomized evaluation of using data-driven implementation strategies to improve cirrhosis care for Veterans. Implement Sci 2020; 15:92. [PMID: 33087156 PMCID: PMC7579930 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01050-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cirrhosis is a rapidly increasing cause of global mortality. To improve cirrhosis care, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed the Hepatic Innovation Team (HIT) Collaborative to support VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) to deliver evidence-based cirrhosis care. This randomized HIT program evaluation aims to develop and assess a novel approach for choosing and applying implementation strategies to improve the quality of cirrhosis care. METHODS Evaluation aims are to (1) empirically determine which combinations of implementation strategies are associated with successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for Veterans with cirrhosis, (2) manualize these "data-driven" implementation strategies, and (3) assess the effectiveness of data-driven implementation strategies in increasing cirrhosis EBP uptake. Aim 1 will include an online survey of all VAMCs' use of 73 implementations strategies to improve cirrhosis care, as defined by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. Traditional statistical as well as configurational comparative methods will both be employed to determine which combinations of implementation strategies are associated with site-level adherence to EBPs for cirrhosis. In aim 2, semi-structured interviews with high-performing VAMCs will be conducted to operationalize successful implementation strategies for cirrhosis care. These data will be used to inform the creation of a step-by-step guide to tailoring and applying the implementation strategies identified in aim 1. In aim 3, this manualized implementation intervention will be assessed using a hybrid type III stepped-wedge cluster randomized design. This evaluation will be conducted in 12 VAMCs, with four VAMCs crossing from control to intervention every 6 months, in order to assess the effectiveness of using data-driven implementation strategies to improve guideline-concordant cirrhosis care. DISCUSSION Successful completion of this innovative evaluation will establish the feasibility of using early evaluation data to inform a manualized, user-friendly implementation intervention for VAMCs with opportunities to improve care. This evaluation will provide implementation support tools that can be applied to enhance the implementation of other evidence-based practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION This project was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov ( NCT04178096 ) on 4/29/20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shari S Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA. .,Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Timothy Morgan
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Jasmohan S Bajaj
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Rachel Gonzalez
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Sierra Pacific Veterans Integrated Service Network, Pharmacy Benefits Management, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Angela Park
- Office of Healthcare Transformation, Veterans Engineering Resource Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lauren Beste
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edward J Miech
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Roudebush VA Medical Center, HSR&D Center for Health Information & Communication, VA PRIS-M QUERI, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Carolyn Lamorte
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Brittney Neely
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Sandra Gibson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | | | - Maggie Chartier
- HIV, Hepatitis and Related Conditions Programs, Office of Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tamar Taddei
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Medicine, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Medicine, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Ross
- HIV, Hepatitis and Related Conditions Programs, Office of Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Matthew J Chinman
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.,RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|