Pdx-1-driven overexpression of aurora a kinase induces mild ductal dysplasia of pancreatic ducts near islets in transgenic mice

Multifaceted Effects of Kinase Inhibitors on Pancreatic Cancer Cells Reveals Pivotal Entities with Therapeutic Implications

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer and is the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for over 90% of pancreatic cancers. Most pancreatic cancers are recalcitrant to radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options for this deadly disease. To this end, we screened a library of kinase inhibitors in the PDAC cell lines PANC-1 and BxPC-3 and identified two highly potent molecules: Aurora kinase inhibitor AT 9283 (AT) and EGFR kinase inhibitor WZ 3146 (WZ). Both AT and WZ exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of viability in both cell lines. Thus, we conducted an in-depth multilevel (cellular, molecular, and proteomic) analysis with AT and WZ in PANC-1 cells, which harbor KRAS mutation and exhibit quasimesenchymal properties representing pancreatic cancer cells as having intrinsic chemoresistance and the potential for differential response to therapy. Elucidation of the molecular mechanism of action of AT and WZ revealed an impact on the programmed cell death pathway with an increase in apoptotic, multicaspase, and caspase 3/7 positive cells. Additionally, the key survival molecule Bcl-2 was impacted. Moreover, cell cycle arrest was observed with both kinase inhibitors. Additionally, an increase in superoxide radicals was observed in the AT-treated group. Importantly, proteomic profiling revealed differentially regulated key entities with multifaceted effects, which could have a deleterious impact on PDAC. These findings suggest potential targets for efficacious treatment, including a possible increase in the efficacy of immunotherapy using PD-L1 antibody due to the upregulation of lactoferrin and radixin. Furthermore, combination therapy outcomes with gemcitabine/platinum drugs may also be more effective due to an increase in the NADH dehydrogenase complex. Notably, protein-protein interaction analysis (STRING) revealed possible enrichment of reactome pathway entities. Additionally, novel therapy options, such as vimentin-antibody--drug conjugates, could be explored. Therefore, future studies with the two kinases as monotherapy/combination therapy are warranted.

Aurora kinase a inhibitor MLN8237 suppresses pancreatic cancer growth

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is notorious for high mortality due to limited options of appropriate chemotherapy drugs. Here we report that Aurora kinase-A expression is elevated in both human and mouse PDAC samples. MLN8237, an inhibitor of Aurora kinase-A, efficiently reduced the proliferation and motility of PDAC cells in vitro as well as tumor growth in orthotropic xenograft model and genetic pancreatic cancer animal models (p53/LSL/Pdx-Cre mice) in vivo. MLN8237 exhibited tumor inhibitory effect through inhibiting proliferation and migration, and inducing apoptosis and senescence. These results provide the molecular basis for a novel chemotherapy strategy for PDAC patients.

Targeting high Aurora kinases expression as an innovative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The Aurora kinases A and B control tumorigenesis by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting proliferation and metastasis, however, it remains unknown whether Aurora A and B overexpressed concomitantly and its clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we obsearved Aurora A and B tended to overexpress parallelly on protein level (r = 0.8679, P < 0.0001) and their co-overexpression (Aurora A^HB^H), associated with the worst prognosis, was an independent predictor for the survival. Importantly, with the lower IC50 and stronger anti-tumor effect than selective inhibitors, SNS-314, the pan-inhibitor of Aurora kinases, which induced YAP (Yes-associated protein) reduction and resulted in P21 accumulation, significantly promoted the polyploidy (> 4N) formation and apoptosis in HCC. High YAP expression (YAP^H) was associated with Aurora A^HB^H, and appeared to be an independent predictor for survival, but P21 not. Moreover, silencing YAP also induced P21 accumulation, and knockdown P21, which enhanced YAP accumulation and weakened the SNS-314-induced YAP reduction, impaired SNS-314-induced apoptosis. Therefore, P21 enhanced the apoptotic effect of SNS-314 in HCC. Taken together, our findings indicated Aurora kinases/YAP/P21 was an oncogenic signaling axis in HCC, and revealed targeting Aurora A^HB^H induced apoptosis by YAP suppression. Our results also provided a solid evidence for SNS-314 as a potential targeted therapy, and a proof-of-concept evidence for a possible combined therapy of SNS-314 plus Hippo pathway inhibitors on HCC.

Aurora kinase A in gastrointestinal cancers: time to target

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a major cause of cancer-related deaths. During the last two decades, several studies have shown amplification and overexpression of Aurora kinase A (AURKA) in several GI malignancies. These studies demonstrated that AURKA not only plays a role in regulating cell cycle and mitosis, but also regulates a number of key oncogenic signaling pathways. Although AURKA inhibitors have moved to phase III clinical trials in lymphomas, there has been slower progress in GI cancers and solid tumors. Ongoing clinical trials testing AURKA inhibitors as a single agent or in combination with conventional chemotherapies are expected to provide important clinical information for targeting AURKA in GI cancers. It is, therefore, imperative to consider investigations of molecular determinants of response and resistance to this class of inhibitors. This will improve evaluation of the efficacy of these drugs and establish biomarker based strategies for enrollment into clinical trials, which hold the future direction for personalized cancer therapy. In this review, we will discuss the available data on AURKA in GI cancers. We will also summarize the major AURKA inhibitors that have been developed and tested in pre-clinical and clinical settings.

TPX2: of spindle assembly, DNA damage response, and cancer

For more than 15 years, TPX2 has been studied as a factor critical for mitosis and spindle assembly. These functions of TPX2 are attributed to its Ran-regulated microtubule-associated protein properties and to its control of the Aurora A kinase. Overexpressed in cancers, TPX2 is being established as marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of malignancies. During interphase, TPX2 resides preferentially in the nucleus where its function had remained elusive until recently. The latest finding that TPX2 plays a role in amplification of the DNA damage response, combined with the characterization of TPX2 knockout mice, open new perspectives to understand the biology of this protein. This review provides an historic overview of the discovery of TPX2 and summarizes its cytoskeletal and signaling roles with relevance to cancer therapies. Finally, the review aims to reconcile discrepancies between the experimental and pathological effects of TPX2 overexpression and advances new roles for compartmentalized TPX2.

Aurora A is differentially expressed in gliomas, is associated with patient survival in glioblastoma and is a potential chemotherapeutic target in gliomas

Aurora A is critical for mitosis and is overexpressed in several neoplasms. Its overexpression transforms cultured cells, and both its overexpression and knockdown cause genomic instability. In transgenic mice, Aurora A haploinsufficiency, not overexpression, leads to increased malignant tumor formation. Aurora A thus appears to have both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressor functions. Here, we report that Aurora A protein, measured by quantitative protein gel blotting, is differentially expressed in major glioma types in lineage-specific patterns. Aurora A protein levels in WHO grade II oligodendrogliomas (n=16) and grade III anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (n=16) are generally low, similar to control epilepsy cerebral tissue (n=11). In contrast, pilocytic astrocytomas (n=6) and ependymomas (n=12) express high Aurora A levels. Among grade II to grade III astrocytomas (n=7, n=14, respectively) and grade IV glioblastomas (n=31), Aurora A protein increases with increasing tumor grade. We also found that Aurora A expression is induced by hypoxia in cultured glioblastoma cells and is overexpressed in hypoxic regions of glioblastoma tumors. Retrospective Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that both lower Aurora A protein measured by quantitative protein gel blot (n=31) and Aurora A mRNA levels measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (n=58) are significantly associated with poorer patient survival in glioblastoma. Furthermore, we report that the selective Aurora A inhibitor MLN8237 is potently cytotoxic to glioblastoma cells, and that MLN8237 cytotoxicty is potentiated by ionizing radiation. MLN8237 also appeared to induce senescence and differentiation of glioblastoma cells. Thus, in addition to being significantly associated with survival in glioblastoma, Aurora A is a potential new drug target for the treatment of glioblastoma and possibly other glial neoplasms.

Identification of susceptibility loci in a mouse model of KRASG12D-driven pancreatic cancer

Genetic background affects susceptibility to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the Ela-KRAS(G12D) mouse model. In this model, KRAS oncogene expression is driven by an elastase promoter in acinar cells of the pancreas on an FVB/NTac (FVB) background [FVB-Tg(Ela-KRAS(G12D))] with the transgene carried on the Y chromosome. Through linkage analysis of crosses between the C57BL/6J (B6), BALB/cJ (BALB), and DBA/2J (D2) inbred strains of mice and resistant FVB-Tg(Ela-KRAS(G12D)), we have identified six susceptibility loci that affect mean preinvasive lesion multiplicity. Markers on chromosome 2 segregated with high tumor multiplicity in all three strains; these loci were designated Prsq1-3 (pancreatic ras susceptibility quantitative trait loci 1-3; combined F2 and N2 LOD(W), 6.0, 4.1, and 2.7, respectively). Susceptibility loci on chromosome 4, designated Prsq4 and Prsq5, were identified in crosses between FVB transgenic mice and B6 or BALB mice (combined F2 and N2 LOD(W), 3.6 and 2.9, respectively). A marker on chromosome 12 segregated with tumor multiplicity in a BALB × FVB-Tg(Ela-KRAS(G12D)) cross and was designated Prsq6 (LOD(W), ∼2.5). B6-Chr Y(FVB-Tg(Ela-KRASG12D)) and BALB-Chr Y(FVB-Tg(Ela-KRASG12D)) consomics, which carry the KRAS transgene on the FVB Y chromosome on an otherwise inbred B6 or BALB background, developed ∼4-fold (B6) and ∼10-fold (BALB) more lesions than FVB-Tg(Ela-KRAS(G12D)) mice. By 12 months of age, 10% of BALB-Chr Y(FVB-Tg(Ela-KRASG12D)) mice developed invasive carcinomas. Our findings provide evidence that regions of chromosomes 2, 4, and 12 influence the development and progression of pancreatic neoplasms initiated by an oncogenic allele of KRAS in mice.

Aurora-A phosphorylates, activates, and relocalizes the small GTPase RalA

The small GTPase Ras, which transmits extracellular signals to the cell, and the kinase Aurora-A, which promotes proper mitosis, can both be inappropriately activated in human tumors. Here, we show that Aurora-A in conjunction with oncogenic Ras enhances transformed cell growth. Furthermore, such transformation and in some cases also tumorigenesis depend upon S194 of RalA, a known Aurora-A phosphorylation site. Aurora-A promotes not only RalA activation but also translocation from the plasma membrane and activation of the effector protein RalBP1. Taken together, these data suggest that Aurora-A may converge upon oncogenic Ras signaling through RalA.

A spontaneous acinar cell carcinoma model for monitoring progression of pancreatic lesions and response to treatment through noninvasive bioluminescence imaging

PURPOSE

We have generated an EL1-luc/TAg transgenic mouse model that develops spontaneous and bioluminescent acinar cell carcinomas. We applied this model to noninvasively monitor tumor development and drug response.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

EL1-luc/TAg transgenic mice of 11 weeks of age were treated with rapamycin (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle for 6 to 12 weeks. Tumor development was monitored through bioluminescence imaging and necropsy at the study end point.

RESULTS

EL1-luc/TAg transgenic mice showed pancreas-specific bioluminescence signal before tumor progression and produced increasing light emission from the onset of the pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas. The latency of tumor development ranged from 10 to >20 weeks of age in these mice. Progression of the primary acinar cell carcinoma was accompanied by emergence of metastatic lesions in the abdominal organs, including liver and gastrointestinal fat tissues. Rapamycin treatment suppressed tumor development.

CONCLUSIONS

The EL1-luc/TAg mouse provides a noninvasive approach for monitoring spontaneous acinar cell carcinoma development and comprises a convenient tool for the evaluation of novel therapeutics against pancreatic cancers. Tumor growth suppression through inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway further validates this model as clinically relevant.

Centrosome function in cancer: guilty or innocent?

The regulation of centrosome number and function underlies bipolar mitotic spindle formation and genetic integrity. Cancer cells both in culture and in situ exhibit a wide range of centrosome abnormalities. Here, we briefly review advances in our understanding of the pathways that govern normal centrosome function and outline the potential causes and consequences of their deregulation in disease. There is ample observational but little experimental evidence to support the conventional model that centrosome dysfunction causes genomic instability and, as a result, cancer. This model has been challenged by recent studies that have uncovered evidence of a direct link between centrosome function in asymmetric cell division and tumourigenesis. Thus, it is timely to discuss the provocative idea that, in certain tissues, abnormal centrosomes drive malignant transformation not by generating genomic instability but by deregulating asymmetric cell division.