Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Clinical practice guideline for the prevention and management of peritoneal dialysis associated infections in children: 2024 update

Infection-related complications remain the most significant cause for morbidity and technique failure in infants, children and adolescents who receive maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). The 2024 update of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Associated Infection in Children builds upon previous such guidelines published in 2000 and 2012 and provides comprehensive treatment guidance as recommended by an international group of pediatric PD experts based upon a review of published literature and pediatric PD registry data. The workgroup prioritized updating key clinical issues contained in the 2012 guidelines, in addition to addressing additional questions developed using the PICO format. A variety of new guideline statements, highlighted by those pertaining to antibiotic therapy of peritonitis as a result of the evolution of antibiotic susceptibilities, antibiotic stewardship and clinical registry data, as well as new clinical benchmarks, are included. Recommendations for future research designed to fill important knowledge gaps are also provided.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

The studies were screened and extracted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov according to predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing any clean or clean-contaminated surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 16 189 participants in 48 RCTs were included in the primary meta-analysis following the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53-0.68). The pooled OR among gastrointestinal, oncology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, oral, and urology surgery was 3.06 (95% CI: 1.05-8.91), 1.16 (95% CI: 0.89-1.50), 2.04 (95% CI: 1.09-3.81), 3.05 (95% CI: 1.25-7.47), 3.55 (95% CI: 1.78-7.06), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.12-4.55), respectively. Furthermore, the summary mean difference (MD) for patients' length of hospitalization was -0.91 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.16). The results of sensitivity analyses for all combined effect sizes showed good stability.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics are both effective, safe, and necessary in preventing surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated procedures, attributed to their reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections as well as the length of patient hospitalization.

The Insertion and Management of Gastrostomies in Children in the United Kingdom - A Survey of Practice

BACKGROUND

Gastrostomy insertion is one of the most frequently performed procedures by specialist paediatric surgeons. We aimed to determine practice across the United Kingdom (UK) and in particular to identify areas where there was consistency or variation in practice between practitioners and centres.

METHODS

A structured survey was distributed to all consultant practitioners who insert gastrostomies in the UK. Practice surrounding a range of aspects of gastrostomy care including insertion technique, device use, post-operative management and subsequent care were determined.

RESULTS

Of total 135 practitioners who insert gastrostomies, responses were received from 103 (76%) with responses received from all UK centres. There was variation between centres in the provision of pre-operative information, and between practitioners in preferred device, insertion techniques, post-operative feeding practice and change/removal procedures. The most frequently preferred device for primary gastrostomy insertion was a Freka® PEG (36%) button device (30%), CorFlo™ PEG (21%), or G-tube (10%). Laparoscopy was always used when inserting either PEG or button device by over 50% of respondents and selectively used by the majority of the remainder. Feeds were started between 1 and 24 h post-insertion, most practitioners (64%) plan a minimum one night hospital stay but a third plan for more than one night.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variation in practice for most stages of the pathway for children having a gastrostomy. Further work is warranted to understand the relationship between different practices and patient outcomes, resource use and cost and subsequently to develop best practice guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

With an aging population, the number of patients with difficulty swallowing due to medical conditions is gradually increasing. In such cases, enteral nutrition is administered through a temporary nasogastric tube. Long-term use of a nasogastric tube leads to various complications and a decreased quality of life. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the percutaneous placement of a tube into the stomach, aided endoscopically, which may be an alternative to a nasogastric tube when enteral nutritional is required for 4 weeks or more. This paper is the first Korean clinical guideline for PEG. It was developed jointly by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research and led by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. These guidelines aimed to provide physicians, including endoscopists, with the indications, use of prophylactic antibiotics, timing of enteric nutrition, tube placement methods, complications, replacement, and tubes removal for PEG based on the currently available clinical evidence.

Nutritional Management in Children and Adolescents with Severe Neurological Impairment-Who Cares? A Web-Based Survey Among Pediatric Specialists in Germany

BACKGROUND

Nutritional management of children and adolescents with severe neurological impairment (SNI) is challenging. A web-based survey was distributed to identify the present situation and the knowledge of the involved medical professionals in Germany.

METHODS

The survey was created with LimeSurvey, and access data were distributed by several medical societies. Eighty-three questions covered four topics: "general information," "gastro- and jejunostomy procedure," "handling of gastrostomies and feeding tubes," and "nutritional management and follow-up of children and adolescents with SNI." A descriptive analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

A total of 156 participated (65 completed and 91 partially), 27% being pediatric gastroenterologists, 23% pediatric neurologists, and 10% pediatric surgeons. The most common indications for gastrostomy and tube feeding were oropharyngeal dysfunction and failure to thrive. Many patients were still underweight after some months of enteral feeding. The procedure of gastrostomy and handling recommendations varied broadly. Frequently, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and written local guidelines did not exist, and there was a considerable request for training. Only 53% of participants were aware of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition position paper published in 2017, even fewer (38%) followed the guidelines. The recommended measures to assess a nutritional status were often not respected.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional management of children and adolescents with SNI in Germany is still strongly deficient. Despite the international guideline of 2017, few colleagues are aware of and adhere to the recommendations. This could be improved by interdisciplinary teaching and evaluation of the reasons for noncompliance. The procedure of gastrostomy and the patients' follow-up vary widely. Therefore, modified SOPs should be developed.

Early Tube Feeding Improves Nutritional Outcomes in Children with Neurological Disabilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Tube feeding is a life-saving treatment for children with neurological disabilities (ND), who often suffer from malnutrition and feeding disorders. Nonetheless, it is still not widely used. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of exclusive tube feeding in a cohort of ND children. All consecutive ND children who started tube feeding at our center within the last 5 years were included in this retrospective study. Weight-for-age, body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) Z-scores, and symptoms were collected at baseline (V0), 6 (V1), and 12 months (V2) after gastrostomy placement. Fifty children (62% males) were included. The ND-underlying disease was genetic (n = 29, 58%), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 17, 34%), or metabolic (n = 4, 8%). Indications for tube feeding were malnutrition (n = 35, 70%), recurrent respiratory infections (n = 11, 22%), or both (n = 4, 8%). Enteral formulae were polymeric (n = 29, 58%), semi-elemental (n = 17, 34%), hypercaloric (n = 3, 6%), or elemental (n = 1, 2%). Homemade blended feed was offered to three children (6%) in addition to the formula. Weight and BMI increased over the study period. Except for constipation, all symptoms (cough, vomiting, and diarrhea) improved at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). Non-serious complications (n = 8; track disruption, granuloma, and skin infection) were observed. Longer disease duration (p < 0.001) at the start of tube feeding was associated with the absence of normalization of nutritional status (BMI Z-score > 2 SD) at 12 months. Tube feeding with commercially available enteral formulae should be started as early as possible for better outcomes.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate if Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) can prevent wound and/or systemic infection in pediatric patients who underwent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Observational Studies that compared AP vs. no Intervention (NI) in children submitted to PEG. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with random-effect models. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed as outlined by Cochrane recommendations.

RESULTS

Four studies, including one RCT, with a total of 568 patients were included, in which 230 (40.5%) individuals received AP. The use of AP during PEG reduced the incidence of systemic infection (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p = 0.02; I² = 0). However, no statistical difference was found for wound infection (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.43-1.69; p = 0.64; I² = 12%) and for the composite outcome of any kind of infection (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.13-4.06; p = 0.73; I² = 67%).

CONCLUSION

In this pooled analysis of 568 infants who underwent PEG, the use of AP reduced the incidence of systemic infection. Our results were compatible with findings obtained in the adult population. No differences were found regarding wound infection or the composite outcome of any kind of infection.

A Comparison Between the Complications of Laparoscopic and Open Gastrostomy Tube Insertions: A Single-Center Study From Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background and objective Gastrostomy is a procedure that involves placing a feeding tube through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutritional support. There are several modes of gastrostomy tube insertion including laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and open gastrostomy (OG) procedure, among others. Although it is a widely performed procedure, limited data is available regarding gastrostomy in Saudi Arabia, specifically among the pediatric population. This study aimed to shed more light on different aspects of surgical gastrostomy procedures among pediatric patients at the King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital (KASCH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The main objective of our study was to report the indications and complications of both LAG and OG insertions in the pediatric population. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at KASCH to analyze the different parameters related to LAG and OG insertions, and to evaluate for any association between these modes of insertion and their complications. Pertinent data on children from birth to 14 years of age were collected through consecutive sampling using a chart review. A total of 107 pediatric patients who underwent the procedure from 2016 to 2020 were evaluated. Results Demographically, the majority (58%) of gastrostomies were performed in infants (less than a year old). Additionally, our study showed a significantly increased association between LAG and complications such as discharge, (27.12%), skin manifestations (27.12%), and bleeding (10.17%) when compared to OG. Conclusion Based on our findings, LAG showed less favorable outcomes in contrast to OG. Further studies should be conducted to validate our findings and ensure consistent results and outcomes among different methods of gastrostomy tube insertion.

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Abdominal Surgery for Neonates and Paediatrics: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study

Surgical site infections (SSIs), i.e., surgery-related infections that occur within 30 days after surgery without an implant and within one year if an implant is placed, complicate surgical procedures in up to 10% of cases, but an underestimation of the data is possible since about 50% of SSIs occur after the hospital discharge. Gastrointestinal surgical procedures are among the surgical procedures with the highest risk of SSIs, especially when colon surgery is considered. Data that were collected from children seem to indicate that the risk of SSIs can be higher than in adults. This consensus document describes the use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in neonates and children that are undergoing abdominal surgery and has the purpose of providing guidance to healthcare professionals who take care of children to avoid unnecessary and dangerous use of antibiotics in these patients. The following surgical procedures were analyzed: (1) gastrointestinal endoscopy; (2) abdominal surgery with a laparoscopic or laparotomy approach; (3) small bowel surgery; (4) appendectomy; (5) abdominal wall defect correction interventions; (6) ileo-colic perforation; (7) colorectal procedures; (8) biliary tract procedures; and (9) surgery on the liver or pancreas. Thanks to the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies that take care of neonates and children, this document presents an invaluable reference tool for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the paediatric and neonatal populations.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: An Update to the ESPGHAN Position Paper

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) position paper from 2015 on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) required updating in the light of recent clinical knowledge and data published in medical journals since 2014.

METHODS

A systematic review of medical literature from 2014 to 2020 was carried out. Consensus on the content of the manuscript, including recommendations, was achieved by the authors through electronic and virtual means. The expert opinion of the authors is also expressed in the manuscript when there was a lack of good scientific evidence regarding PEGs in children in the literature.

RESULTS

The authors recommend that the indication for a PEG be individualized, and that the decision for PEG insertion is arrived at by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) having considered all appropriate circumstances. Well timed enteral nutrition is optimal to treat faltering growth to avoid complications of malnutrition and body composition. Timing, device choice and method of insertion is dependent on the local expertise and after due consideration with the MDT and family. Major complications such as inadvertent bowel perforation should be avoided by attention to good technique and by ensuring the appropriate experience of the operating team. Feeding can be initiated as early as 3 hours after tube placement in a stable child with iso-osmolar feeds of standard polymeric formula. Low-profile devices can be inserted initially using the single-stage procedure or after 2-3 months by replacing a standard PEG tube, in those requiring longer-term feeding. Having had a period of non-use and reliance upon oral intake for growth and weight gain-typically 8-12 weeks-a PEG may then safely be removed after due consultation. In the event of non-closure of the fistula the most successful method for closing it, to date, has been a surgical procedure, but the Over-The-Scope-Clip (OTSC) has recently been used with considerable success in this scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for the best possible treatment of children with PEGs. Morbidity and mortality are minimized through team decisions on indications for insertion, adequate planning and preparation before the procedure, subsequent monitoring of patients, timing of the change to low-profile devices, management of any complications, and optimal timing of removal of the PEG.