The Impact of Survivorship Care Planning on Patients, General Practitioners, and Hospital-Based Staff

Oncology Nurses' Perspectives and Practices Toward the Delivery of Cancer Survivorship Care in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Despite tremendous progress in understanding the unmet needs of cancer survivors, our understanding of oncology nurses' perspectives and practices in the delivery of survivorship care is inadequate.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess oncology nurses' perceptions about their responsibility and frequency of delivery of survivorship care to cancer patients and to examine the factors influencing such care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered to 81 nurses working in the oncology unit of hospitals in Hong Kong. Participants completed an investigator-developed questionnaire designed to assess oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility, practices, and barriers regarding the provision of survivorship care for cancer patients.

RESULTS

Results revealed discrepancies between oncology nurses' perceptions of responsibility and practices, with high levels of perceptions of various survivorship care as their responsibility but low levels in delivery of such care. Despite that discussing and managing pain was agreed by most oncology nurses as their responsibility (95.1%), 34.6% of them have never managed survivors' pain. Besides, 33.3% of nurses have never discussed and managed survivors' sexuality issues. Lack of time (79.0%), inadequate educational resources for family members (59.3%), and lack of knowledge and skills (54.4%) were major factors that impeded survivorship care provision.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence for inadequacies of oncology nurses in delivering survivorship care and their perceived barriers. Further studies are required to enhance our understanding of the strategies for improving the quality of cancer survivorship care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results underscore the need to develop educational resources and enhance training in survivorship care for oncology nurses.

Role of the nurse in the design, delivery, monitoring and coordination of cancer survivorship care plans: An integrative review

AIM

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are recommended as a tool for the care of cancer survivors. SCPs have been implemented with a multidisciplinary approach; however, the specific role of nurses in the SCP is unknown. Our aim is to determine the role of nurses and their degree of participation in cancer SCPs.

DESIGN

Integrative review of the literature with systematic methodology.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane and Cancerlit databases were reviewed. Articles published up to March 2021 were included.

REVIEW METHOD

Of the 2,638 publications identified, 22 studies met our inclusion criteria. Quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment tools.

RESULTS

The studies showed that nurses play a key role and participate in different phases of the SCP, including design, delivery, monitoring and coordination among different levels of care, with varying degrees of involvement and responsibility; design and delivery of the SCP are the phases with the highest nurse participation (18 out of 22 studies). The majority of SCPs are implemented in specialized, hospital-based care and focus on short-term cancer survivors, who are actively undergoing oncological treatments.

CONCLUSION

This review shows that nurses actively participate in the design, implementation and coordination of SCPs. However, SCPs focus on the acute survival and treatment phases, and there is a gap in their use in long-term cancer survivorship. This gap may be one reason the needs of long-term cancer survivors are not covered.

IMPACT

This review contributes to the current body of knowledge by addressing the role of nurses in cancer SCPs. We recommend the involvement of an advanced practice nurse as SCP coordinator to improve communication between cancer specialists and primary care providers and to promote continued care throughout the different phases of cancer survivorship, including long-term survival.

Fear of cancer recurrence in lymphoma survivors: A descriptive study

Objectives: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common experience among cancer survivors and often persists after the termination of cancer treatments. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate FCR in survivors of Hodgkin's and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, given a high rate of survivorship in this patient population.Research Approach: The parent study was a multi-site, cluster-randomized trial to assess a communication skills intervention: survivorship planning consultation (versus a time-attention control - wellness rehabilitation intervention) to promote transition to survivorship.Participants & Methodological Approach: 199 patients enrolled in the study and completed a survivorship (or control) consultation one-month after receiving the news of their survivorship status; 141 of those patients (n = 92 experimental arm, n = 49 control arm) completed an interview at their 6-month follow-up consultation. In the interview, participants described frequency of FCR, causes of FCR, coping mechanisms, and specific things oncologists said to reduce FCR. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were utilized for analyzing participant responses.Findings: The majority (88%) of participants reported experiencing FCR, with a higher number of participants in the experimental arm significantly more likely to endorse FCR compared to the control group participants. The main causes of FCR were having medical appointments and concerns about potential relapse and secondary cancers. Participants endorsed utilizing self-sufficient coping mechanisms. As well, participants reported that oncologists most frequently cited specific cure rates of lymphoma to reduce patients' FCR.Interpretation & Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Communication skills training programs should emphasize FCR in survivorship consultations.

Randomized Trial of the Impact of Empowering Childhood Cancer Survivors With Survivorship Care Plans

Background

A survivorship care plan (SCP), that is, individualized treatment summary and schedule of off-therapy surveillance, will be mandated by January 2019. It is unclear whether SCPs improve adherence to recommended follow-up care in the community. In this trial, we evaluated the impact of randomly assigning childhood cancer survivors to 1) SCPs to be taken to their primary care physician (PCP) to implement or 2) survivorship clinic (SC) on health care quality measures.

Methods

Eligibility included cancer diagnosis younger than age 18 years (2000-2012), cancer free, one or more years off therapy, and no prior survivorship clinic attendance. At 12 months, the random assignment groups were compared (SCP+PCP vs SC) by intent-to-treat analysis with two-sided statistical tests in terms of patient adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance tests (eg, echocardiogram) and number of newly identified late complications of therapy.

Results

From 2011 to 2013, 96 participants (46.9% female, mean age = 15.9 ± 6.1 years) were randomly assigned. Adherence to 14 evaluated guideline-recommended surveillance tests ranged from 0% to 46.9% in the SCP+PCP group (n = 47) and from 50.0% to 86.4% in the SC group (n = 47). Adherence to 10 tests was statistically significantly different between the groups (all P < .05). One mild new late complication was identified in the SCP+PCP group compared with 21 late complications, ranging from mild to severe, identified in 11 patients in the SC group (2.1% vs 23.4% of patients, respectively, P = .003).

Conclusions

Our randomized trial suggests that empowering childhood cancer survivors with SCPs to be implemented by their PCPs is not sufficient to meet consensus follow-up recommendations.

Cancer survivorship care after curative treatment: Chinese oncology practitioners' practices

PURPOSE

To establish oncology practitioners' perceptions of responsibility, confidence levels, and frequency of survivorship care practice in relation to the post-treatment phase of survivorship care in Mainland China; to identify factors associated with oncology practitioners' perceptions of responsibility, confidence levels, and frequency of survivorship care practice; and to examine factors that impede the provision of quality survivorship care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of Chinese oncology practitioners was conducted using a test battery consisting of a self-developed information sheet, a 29-item survivorship care scale (29-SCS), and a 16-item impeding factors scale.

RESULTS

There were 331 participants. Mean values of the four subscales (8.87, 61.82, 18.62, and 40.49) on perceptions of responsibility were relatively higher than those of the mean values of confidence levels and frequency of survivorship care practice. Participant characteristics, including professional discipline, highest educational qualification achieved, work status, work role, and work setting, were identified as factors associated with oncology practitioners' responsibility perceptions, confidence levels, and survivorship care practice frequency. The top three barriers to quality survivorship care perceived by participants were lack of time, an appropriate physical location, and evidence-based practice guidelines to inform survivorship care.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of relatively high levels of perception of responsibility and low levels of confidence in survivorship care suggest that survivorship care is needed, with the aim of implementing oncology practitioners' responsibility and improving their confidence in providing survivorship care in cancer practice. Future multiple levels of cooperation for overcoming barriers and implementing quality survivorship care are highly recommended.

Efficacy of a survivorship-focused consultation versus a time-controlled rehabilitation consultation in patients with lymphoma: A cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Survivors of cancer often describe a sense of abandonment after treatment along with heightened uncertainty and limited knowledge of what lies ahead. This study examined the efficacy of a survivorship care plan (SCP) intervention to help physicians to address survivorship issues through communication skills training plus a new consultation focused on the use of an SCP for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

This 4-site cluster randomized trial examined the efficacy of a survivorship planning consultation (SPC) in patients who achieved complete remission after the completion of first-line therapy (for the SPC, physicians received communication skills training and, using an SCP, applied those skills in a survivorship-focused office visit) versus a control arm in which physicians were trained in and subsequently provided a time-controlled, manualized wellness rehabilitation consultation (WRC) focused only on discussion of healthy nutrition and exercise as rehabilitation after chemotherapy. The primary outcomes for patients were changes in knowledge about lymphoma and adherence to physicians' recommendations for vaccinations and cancer screenings.

RESULTS

Forty-two physicians and 198 patients participated across the 4 sites. Patients whose physicians were in the SPC arm had greater knowledge about their lymphoma (P = .01) and showed greater adherence to physician recommendations for influenza vaccinations (P = .02) and colonoscopy (P = .02) than patients whose physicians were in the WRC arm.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated consultation using an SCP and supported by communication skills training may enhance patients' knowledge and adherence to some health promotion recommendations.

Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes assessed in extant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to outcomes that stakeholders expect from survivorship care plans (SCPs). To facilitate the transition from active treatment to follow-up care for the 15.5 million US cancer survivors, many organizations require SCP use. However, results of several RCTs of SCPs' effectiveness have been null, possibly because they have evaluated outcomes on which SCPs should be expected to have limited influence. Stakeholders (e.g., survivors, oncologists) may expect outcomes that differ from RCTs' outcomes.

METHODS

We identified RCTs' outcomes using a PubMed literature review. We identified outcomes that stakeholders expect from SCPs using semistructured interviews with stakeholders in three healthcare systems in the USA and Canada. Finally, we mapped RCTs' outcomes onto stakeholder-identified outcomes.

RESULTS

RCT outcomes did not fully address outcomes that stakeholders expected from SCPs, and RCTs assessed outcomes that stakeholders did not expect from SCPs. RCTs often assessed outcomes only from survivors' perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs of SCPs' effectiveness have not assessed outcomes that stakeholders expect. To better understand SCPs' effectiveness, future RCTs should assess outcomes of SCP use that are relevant from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

SCPs' effectiveness may be optimized when used with an eye toward outcomes that stakeholders expect from SCPs. For survivors, this means using SCPs as a map to guide them with respect to what kind of follow-up care they should seek, when they should seek it, and from whom they should seek it.

Patient-reported experiences on supportive care strategies following the introduction of the first Swedish national cancer strategy and in accordance with the new patient act

INTRODUCTION

Several supportive care strategies are described in Swedish legislation and policy documents, such as the National Cancer Strategy and the Patient act. No previous systematic evaluation from a patient perspective has been performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate how these supportive care strategies are experienced by patients treated for cancer in the Stockholm-Gotland region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we identified patients (diagnosed with gynaecological, haematological, upper gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer during 2014) from the Swedish Cancer Register. The European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC, Quality of Life Questionnaires, QLQ-C30, Information QLQ-INFO25 and a study-specific questionnaire was used to collect data during follow-up after cancer treatment. We collected data on 869 cancer patients' perception of availability and access to supportive care strategies and how they were experienced.

RESULTS

Among the supportive care strategies suggested in the legislation and policy documents, just over half of the patients (n = 393, 53%) reported that they had access to a contact nurse, while 43% (n = 312) had received an individual written care plan and 16% (n= 137) had been referred to palliative care. Only 29% (n = 218) of the patients reported that they had received information about patient advocacy groups and 8% (n= 62) on medical second opinions from their cancer care team.

DISCUSSION

The supportive care strategies suggested in Swedish legislation and policy documents may be useful but are only available for some patients. The implementation goals for the National Cancer Strategy and the Swedish Patient act have not been reached.

Survivorship care plan outcomes for primary care physicians, cancer survivors, and systems: a scoping review

PURPOSE

With the focus on survivorship care-coordination between oncology and primary care providers (PCPs), there is a need to assess the research regarding the use of survivorship care plans (SCPs) and determine emerging research areas. We sought to find out how primary care physicians have been involved in the use of SCPs and determine SCP's effectiveness in improving care for cancer survivors. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify gaps in the current research and reveal opportunities for further research.

METHODS

We followed the methodology for scoping studies which consists of identifying the research question, locating relevant studies, selecting studies, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results.

RESULTS

Out of 5375 original articles identified in the literature search, 25 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight articles examined PCP-only related outcomes, eight examined survivor-only related outcomes, eight examined mixed outcomes between both groups, and one examined system-based outcomes. Findings highlighted several areas where SCPs may provide benefits, including increased confidence among PCPs in managing the care of survivors and increased quality of life and well-being for survivors. This research also highlighted the need for careful consideration of SCP mode of delivery and content in order to maximize their utility to patients and providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this review, SCPs may benefit providers and health care systems, but the benefits to patients remain unclear. Further research on the potential benefits of SCPs to particular patient populations is warranted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

SCPs appear to be beneficial to PCPs in improving overall quality of care. However, more work needs to be done to understand the direct impact on cancer survivors.

How will cancer survivors use survivorship care plans?

BACKGROUND

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are internationally endorsed as an important tool to enhance post-treatment survivorship care. To support broad implementation of SCPs, we investigated survivors' preferences regarding SCPs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Eligible patients from 10 clinical services, generally up to 12 months following end of treatment (EOT) were approached in clinics or via telephone. A purpose-designed survey assessed survivors' intended use of a SCP and preferences regarding format and content. Intended minimum sample size of 200.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty surveys were returned (response rate 68%). Of the 230 participants, over 55% had completed treatment within six months, 35% between six and 12 months, and 10% were receiving ongoing treatments. Most (82%) had not received a SCP and more than one third (42%) reported receiving no information resources at EOT. Almost all (98%) desired further information. Most common information elements desired in a SCP: 'list of symptoms to watch out for and report' (76%), 'summary of treatment received' (70%) and 'things I can do to look after myself' (67%). Most common suggested uses were as: 'a record of cancer treatment' (63%), 'a reminder of things to do to look after myself ' (57%) and 'to help me understand my cancer experience' (56%). Over half (52%) would share the information with their general practitioner. Most indicated preference for paper-based SCPs (91%). There was support for both brief (36%) and detailed versions (42%). Over half requested the information be delivered in a face-to-face discussion with a health professional. Regular telephone support from the treating health care team was most commonly suggested as an additional service to support survivors after EOT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although similar to international findings, results suggest alternate ways of providing the information that survivors desire. Most desired SCP elements have been defined. A flexible approach to SCP interventions is justified.