1
|
Vikram A, Muller C, Hulme L. Patients' Views on Medical Events in Lung Cancer Screening as Teachable Moments for Smoking Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis. J Smok Cessat 2023; 2023:6647364. [PMID: 37305439 PMCID: PMC10257552 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6647364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Although medical events in lung cancer screening (LCS) such as receiving scan results or interactions with clinicians are recognised as teachable moments (TMs), the views of patients about why this is the case for smoking behaviour change remain uncertain. This systematic review and metasynthesis study is aimed at identifying the reasons why patients believed that medical events during LCS act as TMs for smoking behaviour change. A search strategy was developed for use with MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL-P, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar. This helped identify qualitative and mixed-method research which mentioned patients' views of how these TMs result in smoking behaviour change. After screening, final articles were critically appraised; general characteristics and data relevant to the aims were extracted to conduct a line-of-argument metasynthesis. After screening 695 papers, 11 were included. Undergoing LCS scans was seen to act on their intrinsic motivation to reduce smoking as it served as a "wake-up call" and increased awareness of the health consequences of smoking. Receiving positive or negative LCS results resulted in cessation as it was a "health scare" and challenged smoking habits. Interactions with clinicians addressed misconceptions and signposted them to specialist cessation services. Attendees believed that the following encouraged them to change their smoking behaviour: having an intrinsic motivation to quit, their beliefs on smoking and health reframed, their negative emotions appraised, and using LCS to access specialist support. In line with the TM heuristic, these experiences provided the necessary skills, confidence, and motivation to quit. Future research should explore whether the views of the clinicians match those of the attendees to address misconceptions and further develop clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anvita Vikram
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester BL9 0EQ, UK
| | - Claire Muller
- The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Lucy Hulme
- The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Golden SE, Schweiger L, Melzer AC, Ono SS, Datta S, Davis JM, Slatore CG. "It's a decision I have to make": Patient perspectives on smoking and cessation after lung cancer screening decisions. Prev Med Rep 2022; 30:102014. [PMID: 36237837 PMCID: PMC9551209 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Few studies exist showing that involvement in lung cancer screening (LCS) leads to a change in rates of cigarette smoking. We investigated LCS longitudinally to determine whether teachable moments for smoking cessation occur downstream from the initial provider-patient LCS shared decision-making discussion and self-reported effects on smoking behaviors. We performed up to two successive semi-structured interviews to assess the experiences of 39 individuals who formerly or currently smoked cigarettes who underwent LCS decision-making discussions performed during routine care from three established US medical center LCS programs. The majority of those who remembered hearing about the importance of smoking cessation after LCS-related encounters did not report communication about smoking influencing their motivation to quit or abstain from smoking, including patients who were found to have pulmonary nodules. Patients experienced little distress related to LCS discussions. Patients reported that there were other, more significant, reasons for quitting or abstinence. They recommended clinicians continue to ask about smoking at every clinical encounter, provide information comparing the benefits of LCS with those of quitting smoking, and have clinicians help them identify triggers or other motivators for improving smoking behaviors. Our findings suggest that there may be other teachable moment opportunities outside of LCS processes that could be utilized to motivate smoking reduction or cessation, or LCS processes could be improved to integrate cessation resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E. Golden
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Corresponding author at: 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd. R&D 66, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Liana Schweiger
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Anne C Melzer
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sarah S. Ono
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Santanu Datta
- Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - James M. Davis
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA,Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA,Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taylor KL, Williams RM, Li T, Luta G, Smith L, Davis KM, Stanton C, Niaura R, Abrams D, Lobo T, Mandelblatt J, Jayasekera J, Meza R, Jeon J, Cao P, Anderson ED. A Randomized Trial of Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment in the Lung Cancer Screening Setting. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1410-1419. [PMID: 35818122 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer mortality is reduced via low-dose CT screening and treatment of early-stage disease. Evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in the lung screening setting can further reduce mortality. We report the results of a cessation trial from the NCI's SCALE collaboration. METHODS Eligible patients (N = 818) aged 50-80 were randomized (May 2017-January 2021) to the Intensive vs. Minimal arms (8 vs. 3 phone sessions plus 8 vs. 2 weeks of nicotine patches, respectively). Bio-verified (primary) and self-reported 7-day abstinence rates were assessed 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-randomization. Logistic regression analyses evaluated the effects of study arm. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Participants reported 48.0 (SD = 17.2) pack-years and 51.6% were not ready to quit in < 30 days. Self-reported 3-month quit rates were significantly higher in the Intensive vs. Minimal arm (14.3% vs. 7.9%; OR = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26,3.18). Bio-verified abstinence was lower but with similar relative differences between arms (9.1% vs. 3.9%; OR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.44, 5.08). Compared to the Minimal arm, the Intensive arm was more effective among those with greater nicotine dependence (OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.55, 7.76), normal screening results (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.32, 5.03), high engagement in counseling (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.50, 6.14) and patch use (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.39, 5.68). Abstinence rates did not differ significantly between arms at 6-months (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.68, 2.11) or 12-months (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.82, 2.42). CONCLUSIONS Delivering intensive telephone counseling and nicotine replacement with lung screening is an effective strategy to increase short-term smoking cessation. Methods to maintain short-term effects are needed. Even with modest quit rates, integrating cessation treatment into lung screening programs may have a large impact on tobacco-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L Taylor
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Randi M Williams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tengfei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laney Smith
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kimberly M Davis
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Raymond Niaura
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, NY, NY, USA
| | - David Abrams
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, NY, NY, USA
| | - Tania Lobo
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jinani Jayasekera
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jihyoun Jeon
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pianpian Cao
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Eric D Anderson
- Department of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams RM, Eyestone E, Smith L, Philips JG, Whealan J, Webster M, Li T, Luta G, Taylor KL. Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2211-2224. [PMID: 35448154 PMCID: PMC9027703 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29040180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Offering smoking cessation treatment at lung cancer screening (LCS) will maximize mortality reduction associated with screening, but predictors of treatment engagement are not well understood. We examined participant characteristics of engagement in an NCI SCALE cessation trial. Eligible LCS patients (N = 818) were randomized to the Intensive arm (8 phone counseling sessions +8 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)) vs. Minimal arm (3 sessions + 2 weeks of NRT). Engagement was measured by number of sessions completed (none, some, or all) and NRT mailed (none vs. any) in each arm. In the Intensive arm, those with ≥some college (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.0) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 4.2) engaged in some counseling vs. none. Individuals with higher nicotine dependence were more likely (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3, 6.2) to request NRT. In the Minimal arm, those with higher education (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.9) and undergoing an annual scan (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.04, 3.8) completed some sessions vs. none. Requesting NRT was associated with more pack-years (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1, 3.5). Regardless of treatment intensity, additional strategies are needed to engage those with lower education, less intensive smoking histories, and undergoing a first scan. These efforts will be important given the broader 2021 LCS guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi M. Williams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Ellie Eyestone
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Laney Smith
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Joanna G. Philips
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Julia Whealan
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Marguerite Webster
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | - Tengfei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (T.L.); (G.L.)
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (T.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Kathryn L. Taylor
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (E.E.); (L.S.); (J.G.P.); (J.W.); (M.W.); (K.L.T.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Williams RM, Cordon M, Eyestone E, Smith L, Luta G, McKee BJ, Regis SM, Abrams DB, Niaura RS, Stanton CA, Parikh V, Taylor KL. Improved motivation and readiness to quit shortly after lung cancer screening: Evidence for a teachable moment. Cancer 2022; 128:1976-1986. [PMID: 35143041 PMCID: PMC9038674 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients at high risk for lung cancer, screening using low-dose computed tomography (lung cancer screening [LCS]) is recommended. The purpose of this study was to examine whether screening may serve as a teachable moment for smoking-related outcomes. METHODS In a smoking-cessation trial, participants (N = 843) completed 2 phone interviews before randomization: before LCS (T0) and after LCS (T1). By using logistic and linear regression, the authors examined teachable moment variables (perceived risk, lung cancer worry) and outcomes (readiness, motivation, and cigarettes per day [CPD]). RESULTS Participants were a mean ± SD age of 63.7 ± 5.9 years, had 47.8 ± 7.1 pack-years of smoking, 35.2% had a high school diploma or General Educational Development (high school equivalency) degree or less, and 42.3% were undergoing their first scan. Between T0 and T1, 25.7% of participants increased readiness to quit, 9.6% decreased readiness, and 64.7% reported no change (P < .001). Motivation to quit increased (P < .05) and CPD decreased between assessments (P < .001), but only 1.3% self-reported quitting. Compared with individuals who reported no lung cancer worry/little worry, extreme worry was associated with readiness to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and with higher motivation (b = 0.83; P < .001) at T1. Individuals undergoing a baseline (vs annual) scan were more ready to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5). CONCLUSIONS During the brief window between registering for LCS and receiving the results, the authors observed that very few participants quit smoking, but a significant proportion improved on readiness and motivation to quit, particularly among individuals who were undergoing their first scan and those who were extremely worried about lung cancer. These results indicate that providing evidence-based tobacco treatment can build upon this teachable moment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi M Williams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Marisa Cordon
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Ellie Eyestone
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Laney Smith
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brady J McKee
- Division of Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Shawn M Regis
- Division of Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - David B Abrams
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Raymond S Niaura
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Vicky Parikh
- Department of Population Health, MedStar Shah Medical Group, Hollywood, Maryland
| | - Kathryn L Taylor
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Understanding the Associations between Smoking-Related Risk Perception, Interest in Quitting Smoking, and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening among Homeless Adult Smokers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17238817. [PMID: 33260975 PMCID: PMC7729438 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Individuals experiencing homelessness smoke cigarettes at high rates, suffer a disproportionate incidence of lung cancer, but are unlikely to be screened to enhance early detection. Understanding correlates of lung cancer screening (LCS) interest within this vulnerable group may lend insight into prevention and treatment efforts and reduce their smoking-related morbidity and mortality. This study sought to understand how risk perception and interest in quitting smoking relate to LCS interest among homeless adults. Participants comprised a convenience sample of CO-verified current smokers (N = 310; 72.6% men, Mage = 43 + 11.7) from a homeless shelter in Dallas, TX. Participants self-reported risk perception, interest in quitting smoking, and interest in LCS. The average risk perception was 6.7 + 3.2 (range 0-10), 74.8% (n = 232) agreed or strongly agreed with interest in LCS, and 65.8% (n = 204) were interested in quitting smoking. Greater interest in quitting smoking, but not greater risk perception, was associated with greater interest in LCS (adjusted OR: 1.968, (95% CI: 1.213, 3.191), p = 0.006). Risk perception and interest in quitting smoking did not interact in their association with interest in LCS. Results suggest that homeless smokers with an interest in quitting may be receptive to LCS: a diagnostic tool by which cancers can be caught at earlier stages and prior to metastasis. However, few in the current sample would be eligible for LCS based on current guidelines; results have implications for altered screening practices among chronic smokers experiencing homelessness.
Collapse
|
7
|
Peiffer G, Underner M, Perriot J, Ruppert AM, Tiotiu A. [Smoking cessation and lung cancer screening]. Rev Mal Respir 2020; 37:722-734. [PMID: 33129612 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Several studies have shown that lung cancer screening, using annual low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan in a targeted population of smokers and ex-smokers reduces overall and lung cancer specific mortality rates. This form of screening strategy is not currently established for use in France by the French High Authority for Health. Quitting smoking is the most important measure in reducing mortality from lung cancer. The maximum benefit in reducing mortality from lung cancer should be seen through an effective combination of smoking cessation intervention and chest CT screening to identify early, curable disease. However, current data to guide clinicians in the choice of smoking cessation interventions in this specific context are limited due to the small number of randomized studies that have been carried out. The optimal approach to smoking cessation during lung cancer screening needs to be clarified by new studies comparing different motivation strategies, establishing the ideal moment to propose stopping smoking and the most effective therapies to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Peiffer
- Service de pneumologie, CHR de Metz-Thionville, 1, allée du Château, 57085 Metz, France.
| | - M Underner
- Unité de recherche clinique, centre hospitalier Henri-Laborit, université de Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - J Perriot
- CLAT 63, dispensaire Emile-Roux, centre de tabacologie, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A-M Ruppert
- Unité de tabacologie, service de pneumologie, hôpital Tenon, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 4, rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris cedex 20, France
| | - A Tiotiu
- Département de pneumologie, CHRU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bauer A, Brenner L, Moser J, Trudzinski F, Köllner V, Bals R. The effects of a short-term physician training on smoking cessation in a university pulmonary department. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2020; 18:Doc06. [PMID: 32733176 PMCID: PMC7373096 DOI: 10.3205/000282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effect of a short physician training in smoking cessation on the physicians' performance of smoking cessation interventions. The effects on patients' cessation rates were analyzed as well. A further aim was to identify barriers for providing cessation interventions. The study was conducted in an acute care pulmonology department of a German university hospital. Methods: 24 physicians of the pulmonology department of a German university hospital received a two-hour training in smoking cessation. 109 pre- and 89 post-training group patients were compared with regard to the frequencies of received smoking cessation interventions (Ask, Advise, Assist) and three- and six-month abstinence rates. Physicians estimated their intervention frequencies and gave reasons for not providing cessation interventions. Results: In a multivariable analysis (p<0.05), the physicians' application of "Ask" (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.13-9.53) and the six-month abstinence rates (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.24-5.84) were significantly higher in the post-training group. The univariate analysis also showed a significant effect on "Assist" (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.09-3.87). No significant effect was seen on "Advise to quit". Physicians overestimated their intervention frequencies and reported the patients' low motivation to stop, an oncological disease and palliative care situation as barriers to performing smoking cessation. Conclusion: A short physician training in a hospital department of pulmonology increases the use of guideline-based cessation strategies and may improve cessation rates. The findings show that hospital-based strategies such as physician trainings could be useful in the improvement of smoking cessation. Strategies for overcoming barriers for providing smoking cessation interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bauer
- Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Lorena Brenner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rehabilitation Center Seehof, Federal German Pension Agency, Teltow, Germany
- Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Moser
- Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Trudzinski
- Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Volker Köllner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rehabilitation Center Seehof, Federal German Pension Agency, Teltow, Germany
- Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Bals
- Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pistelli F, Aquilini F, Falaschi F, Puliti D, Ocello C, Lopes Pegna A, Carozzi FM, Picozzi G, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Paci E, Carrozzi L, Gorini G, Manneschi G, Visioli C, Cordopatri G, Giusti F, Esposito I, Bianchi R, Ronchi C, Cini S, De Santis M, Baliva F, Chella A, Tavanti L, Grazzini M, Innocenti F, Natali I, Bartolucci M, Crisci E, De Francisci A, Falchini M, Gabbrielli S, Roselli G, Masi A, Battolla L, De Liperi A, Spinelli C, Vannucchi L, Petruzzelli A, Gadda D, Neri AT, Niccolai F, Vaggelli L, Vella A, Maddau C, Bisanzi S, Janni A, Mussi A, Lucchi M, Comin C, Fontanini G, Tognetti AR, Iacuzio L, Caldarella A, Barchielli A, Goldoni CA. Smoking Cessation in the ITALUNG Lung Cancer Screening: What Does “Teachable Moment” Mean? Nicotine Tob Res 2019; 22:1484-1491. [DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Changes in smoking habits and predictors of smoking cessation were examined in the randomized ITALUNG lung cancer screening trial.
Methods
In three centers, eligible smokers or ex-smokers (55–69 years, ≥20 pack-years in the last 10 years) were randomized to receive annual invitation for low-dose computed tomography for 4 years or usual care. At invitation, subjects received written information for a free smoking cessation program. Quitting outcome was assessed at year 4.
Results
Among participants who completed baseline assessments and year 4 screening, higher quitting (20.8% vs. 16.7%, p = .029) and lower relapse (6.41% vs. 7.56%, p = .50) rates were observed in the active screening group as compared to the usual-care control group. Corresponding figures in the intention-to-treat analysis were as follows: 16.04% versus 14.64% (p = .059) and 4.88% versus 6.43% (p = .26). Quitting smoking was significantly associated to male gender, lower pack-years, and having pulmonary nodules at baseline. Center-specific analyses showed a threefold statistically significant higher probability to quit associated with participating in the smoking cessation program. A subsample of smokers of the scan group from one center showed higher quitting rates over 12-month follow-up as compared to matched controls from the general population who underwent the same smoking cessation program.
Conclusions
Consistently with previous reports, in the ITALUNG trial, screened subjects showed significantly higher quit rates than controls, and higher quit rates were associated with both the presence of pulmonary nodules and participating in a smoking cessation program. Maximal effect on quitting outcome was observed with the participation in the smoking cessation program.
Implications
Participating in lung cancer screening promotes smoking cessation. An effective “teachable moment” may be achieved when the smoking cessation intervention is structured as integral part of the screening clinical visits and conducted by a dedicated team of health care professionals. Standardized guidelines for smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pistelli
- Pulmonary Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ferruccio Aquilini
- Pulmonary Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Falaschi
- 2nd Radiodiagnostic Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Donella Puliti
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Cristina Ocello
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Lopes Pegna
- Formerly Pneumonology Department, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Maria Carozzi
- Cancer Prevention Regional Laboratory, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Picozzi
- Clinical Breast Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Mario Mascalchi
- Formerly Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Eugenio Paci
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Carrozzi
- Pulmonary Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical, and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sharma A, Kasza K, Hyland A, Cummings KM, Bansal-Travers M, Fong GT, O'Connor RJ. Awareness and interest in lung cancer screening among current and former smokers: findings from the ITC United States Survey. Cancer Causes Control 2019; 30:733-745. [PMID: 31123842 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01186-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the awareness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among a population of current and former smokers using a nationally representative sample from the United States. METHODS Data for this study come from Wave 9 of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) United States Survey, conducted between 2013 and 2015. Among respondents age ≥ 40 (n = 1145), a 50% random sample were asked a series of questions pertaining to lung cancer screening. This study examines awareness and screening behaviors in relationship to demographic characteristics of respondents, health beliefs, psychosocial behaviors, and smoking behaviors. Descriptive tables and χ2 tests were used to examine the association between those who were aware and unaware. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, stratified on respondents' smoking status. Data were weighed to be representative of the current smoking population in the US. RESULTS Overall, 52% of current and former smokers reported being aware of lung cancer screening. Among the group with no prior screening, 80.6% said they would take a lung cancer screening exam if recommended by their physician. In the multivariate models, former smokers had significantly greater awareness of lung cancer screening compared to current smokers [odds ratio 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.97)]. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of LDCT lung cancer screening was lower among current smokers compared to former smokers. Most smokers who had not ever been screened said they would have lung cancer screening if it were recommended by their physician, demonstrating the need for healthcare providers to encourage those eligible for screening to take the test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anushree Sharma
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karin Kasza
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Andrew Hyland
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - K Michael Cummings
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Maansi Bansal-Travers
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Fong
- Department of Psychology and School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard J O'Connor
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. Richard.O'
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaufman AR, Dwyer LA, Land SR, Klein WMP, Park ER. Smoking-related health beliefs and smoking behavior in the National Lung Screening Trial. Addict Behav 2018; 84:27-32. [PMID: 29605757 PMCID: PMC6101245 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the association between smoking-related health beliefs and smoking cessation in the context of lung screening is important for effective cessation treatment. The purpose of the current study is to explore how current smokers' self-reported smoking-related health cognitions (e.g., self-efficacy) and emotions (e.g., worry) are related to cessation. This study utilized longitudinal data from current smokers (age 55-74) in a sub-study of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; 2002-2006; N = 2738). Logistic regression analyses examined associations of cessation at last assessment with smoking-related health cognitions and emotions, demographics, and two-way interactions among smoking-related health cognition and emotion variables, gender, and age. Over 37% (n = 1028) of smokers had quit at their last assessment of smoking status. Simple logistic regressions showed the likelihood of quitting was greater among participants reporting higher perceived severity of smoking-related diseases (OR = 1.17, p = .04), greater self-efficacy for quitting (OR = 1.32, p < .001), and fewer perceived barriers to quitting (OR = 0.82, p = .01). Likelihood of quitting was lower among non-Hispanic Black participants (versus non-Hispanic White participants) (OR = 0.68, p = .04) and higher among older participants (OR = 1.03, p = .002). Multiple logistic regression showed that participants reporting greater self-efficacy for quitting (B = 0.09, p = .05), fewer perceived barriers to quitting (B = -0.22, p = .01), and who were older (B = 0.03, p < .01) were more likely to quit smoking. These results suggest that, among heavy smokers undergoing lung screening, smoking-related health cognitions and emotions are associated with smoking cessation. These health beliefs must be considered an integral component of cessation in screening settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette R Kaufman
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, United States.
| | - Laura A Dwyer
- Cape Fox Facilities Services, 7050 Infantry Ridge Road, Manassas, VA 20109, United States
| | - Stephanie R Land
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, United States
| | - William M P Klein
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, United States
| | - Elyse R Park
- MGH/Harvard Medical School, 100 Cambridge Street, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoffman AS, Hempstead AP, Housten AJ, Richards VF, Lowenstein LM, Leal VB, Volk RJ. Using a Patient Decision Aid Video to Assess Current and Former Smokers' Values About the Harms and Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography. MDM Policy Pract 2018; 3:2381468318769886. [PMID: 30288444 PMCID: PMC6157430 DOI: 10.1177/2381468318769886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Recent policy changes require discussing the potential benefits and harms of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. This study explored how current and former smokers value potential benefits and harms after watching a patient decision aid, and their screening intentions. Methods. Current or former smokers (quit within 15 years) with no history of lung cancer watched the decision aid and responded to items assessing the value of potential benefits and harms in their decision making, and their screening intentions. Results. After viewing the decision aid, participants (n = 30; mean age 61.5 years, mean 30.4 pack-year history) were well-informed (mean 80.5% correct responses) and rated anticipated regret and finding cancer early as highly important in their decision (medians >9 out of 10), along with moderate but variable concerns about false positives, overdiagnosis, and radiation exposure (medians 7.0, 6.0, and 5.0, respectively). Most participants (90.0% to 96.7%) felt clear about how they personally valued the potential benefits and harms and prepared for decision making (mean 86.7 out of 100, SD = 21.3). After viewing the decision aid, most participants (90%) intended to discuss screening with their doctor. Limitations. The study is limited to current and former smokers enrolled in a tobacco treatment program, and it may not generalize to other patient populations. Conclusions. The majority of current and former smokers were strongly concerned about anticipated regret and finding cancer early, while concerns about radiation exposure, false positives, and overdiagnosis were variable. After viewing the decision aid, current and former smokers reported strong preparedness and intentions to talk with their doctor about lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aubri S. Hoffman
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrea P. Hempstead
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashley J. Housten
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vincent F. Richards
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa M. Lowenstein
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Viola B. Leal
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purposes of this article are to detail the experience of a single-center academic institution in applying the patient-centered approach to a lung cancer screening program and to examine how this approach can expand to other aspects of follow-up imaging of lung nodules. CONCLUSION As the practice of patient-centered radiology gains attention, diagnostic radiologists are findings new ways to become more involved in patient care. A lung cancer screening program is one opportunity for radiologists to consult with and educate patients.
Collapse
|
14
|
Smoking cessation interventions within the context of Low-Dose Computed Tomography lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Lung Cancer 2016; 98:91-98. [PMID: 27393513 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The integration of smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) within the context of lung cancer screening programs is strongly recommended by screening guidelines, and is a requirement for Medicare coverage of screening in the US. In Europe, there are no lung cancer screening guidelines, however, research trials are ongoing, and prominent professional societies have begun to recommend lung cancer screening. Little is known about the types and efficacy of SCIs among patients receiving low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. This review addresses this gap. Based on a systematic search, we identified six empirical studies published prior to July 1, 2015, that met inclusion criteria for our review: English language, SCI for LDCT patients, and reported smoking-related outcomes. Three randomized studies and three single-arm studies were identified. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated self-help SCIs, whereas one pilot RCT evaluated the timing (before or after the LDCT scan) of a combined (counseling and pharmacotherapy) SCI. Among the single-arm trials, two observational studies evaluated the efficacy of combined SCI, and one retrospectively assessed the efficacy of clinician-delivered smoking assessment, advice, and assistance. Given the limited research to date, and particularly the lack of studies reporting results from RCTs, assumptions that SCIs would be effective among this population should be made with caution. Findings from this review suggest that participation in a lung screening trial promotes smoking cessation and may represent a teachable moment to quit smoking. Findings also suggest that providers can take advantage of this potentially teachable moment, and that SCIs have been successfully implemented in screening settings. Continued systematic and methodologically sound research in this area will help improve the knowledge base and implementation of interventions for this population of smokers at risk for chronic disease.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fucito LM, Czabafy S, Hendricks PS, Kotsen C, Richardson D, Toll BA. Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Cancer 2016; 122:1150-9. [PMID: 26916412 PMCID: PMC4828323 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Smoking cessation is crucial for reducing cancer risk and premature mortality. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended annual lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently approved lung screening as a benefit for patients ages 55 to 77 years who have a 30 pack-year history. The Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) and the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence (ATTUD) developed the guideline described in this commentary based on an illustrative literature review to present the evidence for smoking-cessation health benefits in this high-risk group and to provide clinical recommendations for integrating evidence-based smoking-cessation treatment with lung cancer screening. Unfortunately, extant data on lung cancer screening participants were scarce at the time this guideline was written. However, in this review, the authors summarize the sufficient evidence on the benefits of smoking cessation and the efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for smokers ages 55 to 77 years to provide smoking-cessation interventions for smokers who seek lung cancer screening. It is concluded that smokers who present for lung cancer screening should be encouraged to quit smoking at each visit. Access to evidence-based smoking-cessation interventions should be provided to all smokers regardless of scan results, and motivation to quit should not be a necessary precondition for treatment. Follow-up contacts to support smoking-cessation efforts should be arranged for smokers. Evidence-based behavioral strategies should be used at each visit to motivate smokers who are unwilling to try quitting/reducing smoking or to try evidence-based treatments that may lead to eventual cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M. Fucito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sharon Czabafy
- Wellspan Ephrata Community Hospital Wellness Center, Stevens, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter S. Hendricks
- Department of Human Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Chris Kotsen
- Tobacco Quitcenter, Lung Cancer Institute, Steeplechase Cancer Center, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Somerville, New Jersey
| | - Donna Richardson
- Tobacco Dependence Program, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, School of Public Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Rutgers, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Benjamin A. Toll
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Pulmonary malignancies are a major source of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected persons. Non-AIDS-defining lung cancers (mostly non-small cell lung cancers) are now a leading cause of cancer death among HIV-infected persons. HIV-associated factors appear to affect the risk of lung cancer and may adversely impact cancer treatment and outcomes. HIV infection also may modify the potential harms and benefits of lung cancer screening with computed tomography. AIDS-defining lung malignancies include pulmonary Kaposi sarcoma and pulmonary lymphoma, both of which are less prevalent with widespread adoption of antiretroviral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Sigel
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Robert Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Warren GW, Ostroff JS, Goffin JR. Lung Cancer Screening, Cancer Treatment, and Addressing the Continuum of Health Risks Caused by Tobacco. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:223-9. [PMID: 27249702 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_158704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Tobacco use is the largest preventable risk factor for the development of several cancers, and continued tobacco use by patients with cancer and survivors of cancer causes adverse outcomes. Worldwide tobacco control efforts have reduced tobacco use and improved health outcomes in many countries, but several countries continue to suffer from increased tobacco use and associated adverse health effects. Continued tobacco use by patients undergoing cancer screening or treatment results in continued risk for cancer-related and noncancer-related health conditions. Although integrating tobacco assessment and cessation support into lung cancer screening and cancer care is well justified and feasible, most patients with cancer unfortunately do not receive evidence-based tobacco cessation support. Combining evidence-based methods of treating tobacco addiction, such as behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy, with practical clinical considerations in the setting of lung cancer screening and cancer treatment should result in substantial improvements in access to evidence-based care and resultant improvements in health risks and cancer treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham W Warren
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology and Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology and Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R Goffin
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology and Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McBride CM, Blocklin M, Lipkus IM, Klein WMP, Brandon TH. Patient's lung cancer diagnosis as a cue for relatives' smoking cessation: evaluating the constructs of the teachable moment. Psychooncology 2015; 26:88-95. [PMID: 26514587 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Revised: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To understand whether patient-reported experiences with lung cancer may create teachable moments (TM) for their relatives as evidenced by shifts in their risk perceptions, affective response, and self-image and in turn, motivation to quit smoking. METHODS Patients at a comprehensive cancer center (n = 152) completed a survey within 6 months of lung cancer diagnosis to assess their cancer-related symptoms and openness and enumerated relatives who were smokers. Relative smokers (n = 218) then completed a survey assessing their risk perceptions, affective response, and self-image as a smoker related to the patient's diagnosis (TM mechanisms), and their motivation to quit smoking. Cross-sectional mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to explore the links between patient-reported experiences, and relatives' TM mechanisms, and motivation to quit smoking. RESULTS Relative-reported affect was a significant mediator of the association between patient-reported symptoms and relative smoker's desire to quit. Relatives' self-image was a significant moderator of the association between patient-reported symptoms and relative smoker's desire to quit, such that patients' reported symptoms were associated with relatives' desire to quit only when the relative smoker reported a generally positive self-image as a smoker. No evidence was found for moderated mediation. However, the link between symptoms and negative affect was moderated by perceptions of risk. CONCLUSION Whether smokers experience a family member's lung cancer as a TM is influenced by multiple interrelated cognitive and affective factors that warrant further exploration. Clearer understanding of these factors could inform how to re-invigorate and sustain this motivation to promote concrete actions toward smoking cessation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - William M P Klein
- National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.,National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas H Brandon
- Tobacco Research and Intervention Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ostroff JS, Copeland A, Borderud SP, Li Y, Shelley DR, Henschke CI. Readiness of Lung Cancer Screening Sites to Deliver Smoking Cessation Treatment: Current Practices, Organizational Priority, and Perceived Barriers. Nicotine Tob Res 2015; 18:1067-75. [PMID: 26346948 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer screening represents an opportunity to deliver smoking cessation advice and assistance to current smokers. However, the current tobacco treatment practices of lung cancer screening sites are unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe organizational priority, current practice patterns, and barriers for delivery of evidence-based tobacco use treatment across lung cancer screening sites within the United States. METHODS Guided by prior work examining readiness of health care providers to deliver tobacco use treatment, we administered a brief online survey to a purposive national sample of site coordinators from 93 lung cancer screening sites. RESULTS Organizational priority for promoting smoking cessation among lung cancer screening enrollees was high. Most sites reported that, at the initial visit, patients are routinely asked about their current smoking status (98.9%) and current smokers are advised to quit (91.4%). Fewer (57%) sites provide cessation counseling or refer smokers to a quitline (60.2%) and even fewer (36.6%) routinely recommend cessation medications. During follow-up screening visits, respondents reported less attention to smoking cessation advice and treatment. Lack of patient motivation and resistance to cessation advice and treatment, lack of staff training, and lack of reimbursement were the most frequently cited barriers for delivering smoking cessation treatment. CONCLUSIONS Although encouraging that lung cancer screening sites endorsed the importance of smoking cessation interventions, greater attention to identifying and addressing barriers for tobacco treatment delivery is needed in order to maximize the potential benefit of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening protocols. IMPLICATIONS This study is the first to describe practice patterns, organizational priority, and barriers for delivery of smoking cessation treatment in a national sample of lung cancer screening sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yuelin Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Knobf M, Cooley M, Duffy S, Doorenbos A, Eaton L, Given B, Mayer D, McCorkle R, Miaskowski C, Mitchell S, Sherwood P, Bender C, Cataldo J, Hershey D, Katapodi M, Menon U, Schumacher K, Sun V, Ah D, LoBiondo-Wood G, Mallory G. The 2014–2018 Oncology Nursing Society Research Agenda. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015; 42:450-65. [DOI: 10.1188/15.onf.450-465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
21
|
Zhou QH, Fan YG, Bu H, Wang Y, Wu N, Huang YC, Wang G, Wang XY, Qiao YL. China national lung cancer screening guideline with low-dose computed tomography (2015 version). Thorac Cancer 2015; 6:812-8. [PMID: 26557925 PMCID: PMC4632939 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Results from a randomized controlled trial using annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in specific high-risk groups demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality. METHODS A China national lung cancer screening guideline was developed by lung cancer early detection and treatment expert group appointed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission, based on results of the National Lung Screening Trial, systematic review of evidence related to LDCT screening, and protocol of lung cancer screening program conducted in rural China. RESULTS Annual lung cancer screening with LDCT is recommended for high risk individuals aged 50-74 years who have at least a 20 pack-year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past five years. Individualized decision making should be conducted before LDCT screening. LDCT screening also represents an opportunity to educate patients as to the health risks of smoking; thus, education should be integrated into the screening process in order to assist smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS A lung cancer screening guideline is provided for the high-risk population in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing-Hua Zhou
- Lung Cancer Center/Lung Cancer Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin, China
| | - Ya-Guang Fan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Bu
- Lung Cancer Center/Lung Cancer Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin, China
| | - Ning Wu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| | - Yun-Chao Huang
- Department of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College (Yunnan Tumor Hospital) Kunming, China
| | - Guiqi Wang
- Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Yun Wang
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin, China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Slatore CG, Au DH, Press N, Wiener RS, Golden SE, Ganzini L. Decision making among Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules: a qualitative analysis. Respir Med 2015; 109:532-9. [PMID: 25660437 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Revised: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among patients undergoing lung cancer evaluation for newly diagnosed, incidental pulmonary nodules, it is important to evaluate the shared power and responsibility domain of patient-centered communication. We explored Veterans' perceptions of decision making with regards to an incidentally-detected pulmonary nodule. METHODS We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews of 19 Veterans from one medical center with incidentally-detected pulmonary nodules that were judged as having a low risk for malignancy. We used qualitative description for the analysis, focusing on patients' perceptions of shared decision making with their primary care provider (PCP). Interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012. RESULTS Patients almost always played a passive role in deciding how and when to evaluate their pulmonary nodule for the possibility of malignancy. Some patients felt comfortable with this role, expressing trust that their clinician would provide the appropriate care. Other patients were not satisfied with how these decisions were made with some expressing concern that no decisions had actually occurred. Regardless of how satisfied they were with the decision, patients did not report discussing how they liked to make decisions with their PCP. CONCLUSIONS Veterans in our study did not engage in shared decision making with their clinician. Some were satisfied with this approach although many would have preferred a shared approach. In order to reduce patient distress and improve satisfaction, clinicians may want to consider adopting a shared approach when making decisions about pulmonary nodule evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Slatore
- Health Services Research & Development, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA; Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - David H Au
- Health Service Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nancy Press
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Renda Soylemez Wiener
- Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, & Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA; The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara E Golden
- Health Services Research & Development, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Linda Ganzini
- Health Services Research & Development, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ramsey SD, Malin JL, Goulart B, Ambrose LF, Kanne JP, McKee AB, Reed SD, Schwartz JS, Sullivan SD. Implementing Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Recommendations From an Expert Panel. J Oncol Pract 2015; 11:e44-9. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.2014.001528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of effective and efficient population-based CT lung cancer screening will require involvement and coordination of stakeholders across the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Ramsey
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer L. Malin
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bernardo Goulart
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laurie F. Ambrose
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey P. Kanne
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrea B. McKee
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Shelby D. Reed
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J. Sanford Schwartz
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sean D. Sullivan
- University of Washington; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Wellpoint, Santa Monica, CA; Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington, DC; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; and School of Medicine, Wharton School, and Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fujisawa D, Umezawa S, Basaki-Tange A, Fujimori M, Miyashita M. Smoking status, service use and associated factors among Japanese cancer survivors--a web-based survey. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:3125-34. [PMID: 24848577 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2284-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2013] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to investigate smoking status and its associated factors among Japanese cancer survivors. We stretched our focus on association with health-related behaviors other than smoking (alcohol intake, physical exercise, and social activity) and the smoking cessation strategies used by cancer survivors. METHODS An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted, enrolling survivors of various types of cancer up to 10 years after diagnosis. Smoking status, socioeconomic status, health-related behaviors other than smoking, and smoking cessation resource that the participants used were evaluated. Factors associated with continuous smoking after cancer diagnosis were explored using multivariate analysis. RESULTS Among 168 participants who were smoking at the time of cancer diagnosis, 96 participants (57.1 %) continued smoking. Sixty-seven survivors (69.8 %) were willing to reduce or quit smoking, however, only 39 survivors (40.6 %) were provided with counseling or intervention on smoking cessation. Male gender, shorter time after cancer diagnosis, and lack of regular physical exercise associated with continuous smoking. Higher level of fear of cancer recurrence had trend-level significance of association with smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS Substantial proportions of Japanese cancer survivors continue smoking after diagnosis of cancer. The majority of them are not provided with relevant information or support, despite their willingness of reducing or quitting smoking. Smoking cessation is associated with other health behaviors (i.e., physical exercise). This suggests considerable missed opportunities for health-care providers to provide cancer survivors with counseling and evidence-based interventions. Promotion of professional support on smoking cessation and education to encourage healthy behaviors are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Fujisawa
- Psycho-Oncology Division, National Cancer Center East, Kashiwa, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smoking Behaviors among Patients Receiving Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening. Systematic Review in Support of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11:619-27. [DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201312-460oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
26
|
Zhou Q, Fan Y, Wu N, Huang Y, Wang Y, Li L, Liu J, Wang X, Li W, Qiao Y. Demonstration program of population-based lung cancer screening in China: Rationale and study design. Thorac Cancer 2014; 5:197-203. [PMID: 26767001 PMCID: PMC4704303 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death and has become an enormous economic burden in China. Low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) screening could reduce lung cancer mortality. The feasibility of conducting a population-based lung cancer screening with LDCT in China is uncertain. METHODS In 2010, a demonstration program of lung cancer screening was initiated in China. High-risk individuals were enrolled in a cluster sampling design in different centers. Participants received baseline and annual screening with spiral CT and follow-up information was collected. The objective of this program is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting population-based LDCT lung cancer screening in the Chinese context. The rates of detection, early diagnosis and treatment are defined as indicators of program performance. The optimal management strategies for nodules are explored in the Chinese context based on experiences in other studies overseas. RESULTS A demonstration program of ongoing prospective, multi-center, population-based lung cancer screening is being performed in China. CONCLUSIONS This demonstration program will provide opportunities to explore the feasibility of LDCT lung cancer screening in the Chinese setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinghua Zhou
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Environment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Yaguang Fan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Environment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Ning Wu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Cancer HospitalBeijing, China
| | - Yunchao Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College (Yunnan Tumor Hospital)Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Lu Li
- Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiewei Liu
- Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xinyun Wang
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Weimin Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Youlin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Munshi V, McMahon P. Importance of Smoking Cessation in a Lung Cancer Screening Program. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2013; 1:10.1007/s40137-013-0030-1. [PMID: 24312745 PMCID: PMC3845362 DOI: 10.1007/s40137-013-0030-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Early detection of lung cancer and smoking cessation interventions can decrease lung cancer mortality, but information on the effectiveness and interaction between smoking cessation and lung cancer screening is sparse and inconsistent. This review aims to synthesize recent studies in two major areas of interest. First, we explore the interactions and potential for synergies between lung cancer screening programs and smoking cessation by summarizing reported changes in smoking behavior observed in major screening trials in the United States and Europe, as well as attempts to use smoking cessation interventions to augment the benefits from lung cancer screening programs. Second, we review the interaction between smoking habits and pre/post-operative pulmonary resection outcomes, including changes in smoking behavior post-diagnosis and post-treatment. Information from these areas should allow us to maximize benefits from smoking cessation interventions through the entire lung cancer screening process, from the screen itself through potential curative resection after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidit Munshi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Pamela McMahon
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jacobson FL, Jaklitsch MT. Tobacco cessation and health promotion. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108:312-4. [PMID: 23904220 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
29
|
Schnoll RA, Wileyto EP, Leone FT, Langer C, Lackman R, Evans T. Is a cancer diagnosis a teachable moment for the patient's relative who smokes? Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24:1339-46. [PMID: 23605220 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0212-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2013] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined a cancer diagnosis, versus orthopedic surgery, as a teachable moment for recruiting smokers and treating nicotine dependence among patients' relatives. METHODS Cancer patients and, for comparison, orthopedic patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System were approached for referrals of relatives for a smoking cessation program, which involved behavioral counseling and nicotine patches. Primary outcomes were rate of program enrollment and rate of smoking abstinence. Potential mediators of smoking cessation were explored (e.g., treatment adherence, depression, anxiety). Two hundred and thirty-four relatives (113 cancer, 121 orthopedic) were considered eligible for the cessation program and comprised the study sample. RESULTS Relatives of oncology patients were significantly more likely to enroll in the smoking cessation program, vs. orthopedic relatives (75 % vs. 60%; OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.07-3.61, p = .03), but they were not significantly more likely to remain in the program (61% vs. 52%) or quit smoking (19% vs. 26%; p's > .05). Compared to orthopedic relatives, oncology relatives showed significantly lower nicotine patch adherence and significantly greater levels of negative affect and depression and anxiety symptoms during treatment (p's < .05). Further, orthopedic relatives, compared to oncology relatives, showed a greater reduction in the perceived benefits of smoking (p = .06), which was significantly associated with abstinence (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS While a family member's cancer diagnosis may serve as a teachable moment for a smoker to enroll in a smoking cessation treatment program, high levels of psychological distress and perceptions of the benefits of smoking and low levels of treatment adherence may undermine successful abstinence among this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Schnoll
- Department of Psychiatry and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|