1
|
Rankin NM, Jacobsen PB. Implementation science and psycho-oncology: Advancing the translation of evidence into practice. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6363. [PMID: 38840302 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This Special issue of Psycho-Oncology highlights examples of the application of implementation science to research in psycho-oncology. The aim is to demonstrate the different ways that implementation science is being used to generate evidence that can more readily translate evidence into changes in clinical practice. We hope this issue fosters greater interest in using the tools of implementation science to improve the lives of people affected by cancer. METHODS The papers in the issue were selected from among those that responded to a call for submissions on the application of implementation science frameworks and methods to issues in psycho-oncology. The focus included but was not limited to research on: understanding barriers and facilitators of intervention/practice adoption; assessing implementation outcomes, evaluating implementation strategies, and improving behavioural and/or clinical outcomes. RESULTS The 11 papers in this issue were grouped for presentation purposes into four common topics: barriers and facilitators to implementation; feasibility as a key implementation outcome; the design, selection and adaptation of implementation strategies; and building the foundation for psycho-oncology research translation via systematic reviews that focus on implementation strategy design. CONCLUSION These papers demonstrate the breadth of current applications of implementation science to research in psycho-oncology. Alongside the studies featured in this issue, including cost-effectiveness analyses, tests of nationally-focused strategies and proactive planning for adaptation, we look forward to other innovations that will promote further growth of both disciplines to improve the integration of psycho-oncology interventions across healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Rankin
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kohut K, Morton K, Turner L, Foster R, Eccles D, Foster C. Codesign of Lynch Choices TM : Using implementation science to create a clinically deliverable patient decision support website to transform cancer genetics care pathways. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6330. [PMID: 38502032 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resources including Patient Decision Aids (PtDA) are useful and valued by patients and clinicians to provide information and complement shared decision-making. Despite their promise, few PtDA exist for patients with genetic cancer susceptibility facing difficult decisions about risk management. We aimed to fill this gap, partnering with patients to codesign Lynch ChoicesTM , a PtDA website for families with Lynch Syndrome. In addition to a Patient Reference Panel, we purposively invited an international stakeholder panel including charities, public bodies, clinical and academic experts. Implementation strategies and frameworks were employed to optimise translation of research findings to improve care. METHODS Patient/stakeholder suggestions were incorporated in a transparent Table of Changes and prioritised using the Person-Based Approach throughout planning and codesign of Lynch ChoicesTM . An interactive stakeholder meeting was convened to identify barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the PtDA. RESULTS Patient and stakeholder partnerships drove the direction of the research throughout codesign, resulting in several iterative refinements to the PtDA prior to roll out including the addition of illustrations/videos, clearer presentation of cancer risks and increased accessibility for lower literacy. Barriers and facilitators identified from stakeholders were used to create an implementation process map. CONCLUSIONS Creating an effective, engaging PtDA is not enough. Systematic uptake in real world clinical practice, with its resource limitations, is needed to optimise benefit to patients and clinicians. Assessment of speed and breadth of dissemination and usage will be collected to further evidence the benefit of embedding implementation science methods from the outset to translate research findings into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Kohut
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lesley Turner
- Patient and Public Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deuning-Smit E, Custers JAE, Braam CIW, Hermens RPMG, Prins JB. Toward implementation of an evidence-based intervention for fear of cancer recurrence: Feasibility in real-world psycho-oncology practice. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6297. [PMID: 38282226 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few evidence-based interventions addressing high levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) have been implemented. Understanding how these might be implemented is crucial to bridge the research-practice gap. This study investigated the feasibility of implementing the blended Survivors' Worries of Recurrent Disease (SWORD) intervention in real-world psycho-oncology practice. METHODS SWORD was offered for 15 months (2021-2022) as the standard care for clinical FCR in a university hospital, a general hospital, and psycho-oncological center. We evaluated using a mixed-methods design six feasibility outcomes based on Bowen's framework: demand, limited effectiveness, degree of execution, acceptability, practicality, and integration. Anonymous data were collected for all oncology patients on referral. Study participants completed questionnaires before and after treatment, including the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS-6) as the primary measure of effectiveness. Qualitative data included interviews with patients and psychologists, and field notes. RESULTS Regarding demand, 81 of 644 patients referred (13%) were eligible for SWORD. The uptake of SWORD was 79% (n = 63/80) and the completion rate 73% (n = 46/63). SWORD was effective in reducing FCR (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.694). Regarding execution, a variability in the length, planning and number of treatment sessions was found between different settings. Adherence to the treatment manual's content was high (89%). Regarding acceptability, most patients were satisfied with SWORD (average 8.2/10) and psychologists valued the blended format. Psychologists reported SWORD was practical to deliver given their knowledge and skills. Although differences between settings were found, SWORD integrated well into practice. Referral for FCR and a reluctance to contract new eHealth providers were barriers for implementation. CONCLUSIONS Despite differences between healthcare settings, the implementation of SWORD was evaluated well. The feasibility of SWORD in different settings should inform a national implementation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Deuning-Smit
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - José A E Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cheyenne I W Braam
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Department of IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grassi L, Watson M. Core-curriculum in psycho-oncology: Towards the certification of the psycho-oncologist profession. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6285. [PMID: 38282216 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Issues relating to certification of the Psycho-oncology profession require clarification in order to provide high quality comprehensive psychosocial care within oncology. We conducted a survey identifying existing training, professional registration requirements and accreditation programs, at national levels, for the specialty of psycho-oncology as well as the mandatory presence of this specialist in cancer teams. METHODS This survey was conducted within the International Psycho-Oncology Society Federation of psycho-oncology societies and included representatives of each national federated society and some countries not belonging to the Federation. Survey questions were emailed requesting specific details, from the registered contact person, for each country, about psycho-oncology training, professional registration and accreditation. RESULTS Of 43 countries contacted (34 Federated and 9 non-federated members), 39 replied and answered the questionnaire (90, 7%). Disparities were reported between countries, with details indicating differences from having no national program, to quite detailed and legally accredited requirements. The majority of countries had no formally recognized profession of "Psycho-oncologist," while some countries reported that it is mandatory (or recommended to have) a specialist in psycho-oncology in cancer centers and, thus, that an accredited, nationally recognized and certified training in this specialty exists. CONCLUSIONS The study underlines the need to create a curriculum for the specialty (certification and accreditation) for the profession of psycho-oncology. Given the lack of internationally recognized core standards, ideas and proposals for minimum standards of good care and the training required to deliver this, are explored to clarify who may use the designation "Clinical Psycho-oncologist."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Grassi
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- University Hospital Psychiatry Section, Integrated Department of Mental Health, S. Anna and Local Health Trust, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Maggie Watson
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Onco-Genetics, Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Research and Innovation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Conley CC, Ryba MM, Brothers BM, Lo SB, Andersen BL. Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence-based intervention: A mixed-methods study. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6272. [PMID: 38282229 PMCID: PMC10832865 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adaptations are intentional modifications maximizing the fit of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) in new context. Little is known about EBI adaptation within psychosocial oncology. Guided by the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME), this mixed-methods study describes oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI and examines the relationship between planned adaptations and longitudinal EBI usage. METHODS Providers (N = 128) were social workers (47%) and psychologists (40%) practicing in community settings (44%) or academic medical centers (41%). They attended a 3-day training on a multicomponent psychosocial oncology EBI, the Biobehavioral Intervention (BBI). During training, providers prepared an "adaptation plan" describing necessary adaptations to BBI and rationales for change. Qualitative data from adaptation plans were analyzed using directed content analysis. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between adaptation characteristics (number, similarity to the manualized BBI) and EBI usage across 12 months post-training. RESULTS Three sets of qualitative themes reflecting FRAME elements emerged: (1) content modifications (e.g., shortening/condensing, selecting elements, adding/removing elements); (2) contextual changes (e.g., alternative group formats); and (3) reasons for adaptations (e.g., organization/setting, provider, and recipient factors). Neither number of adaptations nor adaptation similarity were associated with BBI usage across 12 months post-training. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI. Planned adaptations did not increase usage, but importantly they did not decrease usage. The adaptation process enabled providers to make thoughtful adaptation choices, with implementation successful irrespective of setting constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C. Conley
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marlena M. Ryba
- Department of Psychology, Costal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA
| | - Brittany M. Brothers
- Department of Psychiatry, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Stephen B. Lo
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kool M, Hafkamp E, Gol J, Aukema EJ, Malfitano C, Reyners A, Hales S, van de Poll L, Rodin G, de Vries F. Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM): Implementation in Dutch cancer care. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6281. [PMID: 38282218 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) is a brief, evidence-based psychotherapy tailored for patients with advanced cancer that has not yet been implemented routinely in Dutch cancer care. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability and effectiveness of CALM in different clinical settings in the Netherlands. METHODS In 2019 and 2020 a multi-center, intervention-only study was performed in three Dutch cancer care settings. Professionals were trained to provide CALM under supervision. Patients diagnosed with advanced cancer were included and filled out questionnaires to measure depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), death anxiety (Death and Dying Distress Scale), and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety) at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire was used to assess acceptability of CALM at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Sixty-four patients (55% of the eligible patients) were included in the study and 85% of the included patients received 3 or more CALM sessions. Of the 24 trained therapists, 15 (63%) started providing CALM. Two years post-study, CALM was provided in each center by a total of 19 therapists. On average, patients perceived CALM to be at least somewhat helpful. A significant decrease in severity of depression (p = 0.006), death anxiety (p = 0.008), and anxiety (p = 0.024) was observed over time. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that CALM therapy is feasible, acceptable, and sustainable in three Dutch cancer care settings, although not all predefined feasibility criteria for therapists were met. CALM can be effective in decreasing feelings of depression, anxiety, and death anxiety in patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Kool
- Center for Quality of Life, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek -Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emma Hafkamp
- Center for Quality of Life, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek -Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janna Gol
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eline J Aukema
- Ingeborg Douwes Centrum (IDC), Centre of Expertise in Psycho-Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carmine Malfitano
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - An Reyners
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Hales
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lonneke van de Poll
- Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Froukje de Vries
- Department of Psychiatry, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baye AA, Bogale SK, Delie AT, Melak Fekadie M, Wondyifraw HG, Tigabu ME, Kebede M. Psychosocial distress and associated factors among adult cancer patients at oncology: a case of Ethiopia. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1238002. [PMID: 38192622 PMCID: PMC10772143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Psychosocial distress is a chronic burden for cancer survivors, which impacts both their quality of life and their oncologic prognosis. Although the national cancer prevention and control program in Ethiopia has made efforts in cancer prevention, control, and management by implementing the national cancer control plan 2016-2020, there was no enough evidence about psychosocial distress among adult cancer patients. So, it is critical to understand the magnitude of psychosocial distress and the factors that contribute to it. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of psychosocial distress and associated factors among adult cancer patients at oncology units in the Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. 2022. Methods A multicenter institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of 605 adult cancer patients from 30 April to 22 June 2022. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select the study units. In addition, data were collected through interviewers administered questionnaires by using the validated and pretested tools. Distress was assessed using the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients Revised 10. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to describe the association between dependent and independent variables. Independent variable with p < 0.25 in the bivariable logistic regression analyses were entered into multivariable logistic regression model. Variables with p < 0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression analyses were considered as statistically significant associated factors of psychosocial distress. Result A total of 593 adult cancer patients took part in this study with mean age of 46.86 ± 14.5 years. The overall prevalence of psychosocial distress was 63.74%. Variables such as being female [AOR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-3.17], patients who lives in rural areas (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.49-3.54), community-based health insurance utilization (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51), patients on chemotherapy treatment (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.38-5.39), patients with comorbidity (AOR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.67-6.10), and symptom burdens such as severe fatigue (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI:1.09-2.39) and severe nausea (AOR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.43-3.00) were statistically associated with psychosocial distress. Conclusion and recommendation In general, the findings of this study showed a relatively high magnitude in which around two-thirds of patients experienced psychosocial distress. It is better to establish and enforce the integration and coordination of psychosocial oncology service programs at national level with parallel guidelines and policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astewle Andargie Baye
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Sitotaw Kerie Bogale
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Abebu Tegenaw Delie
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Mengistu Melak Fekadie
- Department of Pediatric and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | | | - Mengistu Ewunetu Tigabu
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Mulu Kebede
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faris MM, Shepherd HL, Butow PN, Kelly P, He S, Rankin N, Masya L, Shaw J. Staff- and service-level factors associated with organisational readiness to implement a clinical pathway for the identification, assessment, and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:866. [PMID: 37582818 PMCID: PMC10426102 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organisational readiness is recognised as a key factor impacting the successful translation of research findings into practice. Within psycho-oncology, measuring organisational readiness and understanding factors impacting organisational readiness is crucial as it is often challenging to implement evidence-based findings into routine cancer care. In this quantitative study, we examined the level of organisational readiness of cancer services preparing to implement a clinical pathway for the screening, assessment, and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (the ADAPT CP) within a cluster randomised controlled trial and sought to identify staff- and service-level factors associated with organisational readiness. METHODS Multidisciplinary staff across 12 Australian cancer services were identified. Their perceptions of their services' readiness to implement the ADAPT CP in the cancer stream or treatment modality selected within their service was assessed prior to implementation using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale. Data collection included staff demographic and professional characteristics, and their perception of the ADAPT CP using a set of 13 study-specific survey items. Service characteristics were captured using a site profile audit form and workflows during site engagement. RESULTS Fourteen staff- and service-level factors were identified as potentially impacting organisational readiness. To identify factors that best explained organisational readiness, separate univariate analyses were conducted for each factor, followed by a backward elimination regression. Compared to services that implemented the ADAPT CP in one treatment modality, those opting for four treatment modalities had significantly higher organisational readiness scores. Staff in administrative/technical support/non-clinical roles had significantly higher organisational readiness scores compared to psychosocial staff. Higher organisational readiness scores were also significantly related to more positive perceptions of the ADAPT CP. CONCLUSIONS Readiness to implement an anxiety and depression clinical pathway within 12 oncology services was high. This may be attributed to the extensive engagement with services prior to implementation. The factors associated with organisational readiness highlight the importance of ensuring adequate resourcing and supporting staff to implement change, effectively communicating the value of the change, and taking a whole-of-service approach to implementing the change. Future longitudinal studies may identify factors associated with ongoing readiness and engagement prior to implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ADAPT RCT was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/03/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372486&isReview=true .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona M Faris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Patrick Kelly
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Sharon He
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Applebaum AJ, Sannes T, Mitchell HR, McAndrew NS, Wiener L, Knight JM, Nelson AJ, Gray TF, Fank PM, Lahijani SC, Pozo-Kaderman C, Rueda-Lara M, Miran DM, Landau H, Amonoo HL. Fit for Duty: Lessons Learned from Outpatient and Homebound Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation to Prepare Family Caregivers for Home-Based Care. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:143-150. [PMID: 36572386 PMCID: PMC9780643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In the past decade, the demand for home-based care has been amplified by the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Home-based care has significant benefits for patients, their families, and healthcare systems, but it relies on the often-invisible workforce of family and friend caregivers who shoulder essential health care responsibilities, frequently with inadequate training and support. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a potentially curative but intensive treatment for many patients with blood disorders, is being increasingly offered in home-based care settings and necessitates the involvement of family caregivers for significant patient care responsibilities. However, guidelines for supporting and preparing HCT caregivers to effectively care for their loved ones at home have not yet been established. Here, informed by the literature and our collective experience as clinicians and researchers who care for diverse patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HCT, we provide considerations and recommendations to better support and prepare family caregivers in home-based HCT and, by extension, family caregivers supporting patients with other serious illnesses at home. We suggest tangible ways to screen family caregivers for distress and care delivery challenges, educate and train them to prepare for their caregiving role, and create an infrastructure of support for family caregivers within this emerging care delivery model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Applebaum
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - T Sannes
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - H R Mitchell
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York
| | - N S McAndrew
- College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, Patient Care Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - L Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - J M Knight
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Microbiology & Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - A J Nelson
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - T F Gray
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - P M Fank
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S C Lahijani
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Division of Medical Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - C Pozo-Kaderman
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - M Rueda-Lara
- University of Miami/Leonard Miller School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
| | - D M Miran
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - H Landau
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - H L Amonoo
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Shea R, Ma AS, Jamieson RV, Rankin NM. Precision medicine in Australia: now is the time to get it right. Med J Aust 2022; 217:559-563. [PMID: 36436133 PMCID: PMC10100177 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan S Ma
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.,Western Sydney Genetics Program, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW
| | - Robyn V Jamieson
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.,Western Sydney Genetics Program, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.,Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deuning-Smit E, Kolsteren EEM, Kwakkenbos L, Custers JAE, Hermens RPMG, Prins JB. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of the SWORD evidence-based psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence in three different healthcare settings. J Cancer Surviv 2022:10.1007/s11764-022-01285-x. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01285-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions are effective, but few are implemented. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the evidence-based blended SWORD intervention in routine psycho-oncological care.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews with 19 cancer survivors and 18 professionals from three healthcare settings assessed barriers and facilitators in six domains as described by the determinant frameworks of Grol and Flottorp: (1) innovation, (2) professionals, (3) patients, (4) social context, (5) organization, and (6) economic and political context.
Results
In the innovation domain, there were few barriers. Facilitators included high reliability, accessibility, and relevance of SWORD. In the professional domain, physicians and nurses barriers were lack of self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills to address FCR whereas psychologists had sufficient knowledge and skills, but some were critical towards protocolized treatments, cognitive behavioral therapy, or eHealth. Patient domain barriers included lack of FCR awareness, negative expectations of psychotherapy, and unwillingness/inability to actively engage in treatment. A social context domain barrier was poor communication between different healthcare professionals. Organization domain barriers included inadequate referral structures to psychological services, limited capacity, and complex legal procedures. Economic and political context domain barriers included lack of a national implementation structure for evidence-based psycho-oncological interventions and eHealth platform costs.
Conclusions
Implementation strategies should be targeted at patient, professional, organizational and economic and political domains. Identified barriers and facilitators are relevant to other researchers in psycho-oncology that aim to bridge the research-practice gap.
Implications for cancer survivors
This study contributes to the implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions for cancer survivors, who can benefit from these services.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuo GM, Trinkley KE, Rabin B. Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2022; 5:995-1004. [PMID: 36212610 PMCID: PMC9534307 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Traditional research focuses on efficacy or effectiveness of interventions but lacks evaluation of strategies needed for equitable uptake, scalable implementation, and sustainable evidence-based practice transformation. The purpose of this introductory review is to describe key implementation science (IS) concepts as they apply to medication management and pharmacy practice, and to provide guidance on literature review with an IS lens. There are five key ingredients of IS, including: (1) evidence-based intervention; (2) implementation strategies; (3) IS theory, model, or framework; (4) IS outcomes and measures; and (5) stakeholder engagement, which is key to a successful implementation. These key ingredients apply across the three stages of IS research: (1) pre-implementation; (2) implementation; and (3) sustainment. A case example using a combination of IS models, PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability model) and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance), is included to describe how an IS study is designed and conducted. This case is a cluster randomized trial comparing two clinical decision support tools to improve guideline-concordant prescribing for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The review also includes information on the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), which is used for literature review and reporting of IS studies,as well as IS-related learning resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace M Kuo
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and Professor Emerita at University of California San Diego; Address: 1300 S. Coulter Street, Suite 104, Amarillo, TX 79106
| | - Katy E Trinkley
- University of Colorado Skaggs Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the Anschutz Medical Campus; Aurora, Colorado
| | - Borsika Rabin
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science and Co-Director of the UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center at University of California San Diego; La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kusch M, Labouvie H, Schiewer V, Talalaev N, Cwik JC, Bussmann S, Vaganian L, Gerlach AL, Dresen A, Cecon N, Salm S, Krieger T, Pfaff H, Lemmen C, Derendorf L, Stock S, Samel C, Hagemeier A, Hellmich M, Leicher B, Hültenschmidt G, Swoboda J, Haas P, Arning A, Göttel A, Schwickerath K, Graeven U, Houwaart S, Kerek-Bodden H, Krebs S, Muth C, Hecker C, Reiser M, Mauch C, Benner J, Schmidt G, Karlowsky C, Vimalanandan G, Matyschik L, Galonska L, Francke A, Osborne K, Nestle U, Bäumer M, Schmitz K, Wolf J, Hallek M. Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:543. [PMID: 35459202 PMCID: PMC9034572 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The annual incidence of new cancer cases has been increasing worldwide for many years, and is likely to continue to rise. In Germany, the number of new cancer cases is expected to increase by 20% until 2030. Half of all cancer patients experience significant emotional and psychosocial distress along the continuum of their disease, treatment, and aftercare, and also as long-term survivors. Consequently, in many countries, psycho-oncological programs have been developed to address this added burden at both the individual and population level. These programs promote the active engagement of patients in their cancer therapy, aftercare and survivorship planning and aim to improve the patients' quality of life. In Germany, the “new form of care isPO” (“nFC-isPO”; integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology/integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psycho-Onkologie) is currently being developed, implemented and evaluated. This approach strives to accomplish the goals devised in the National Cancer Plan by providing psycho-oncological care to all cancer patients according to their individual healthcare needs. The term “new form of care" is defined by the Innovation Fund (IF) of Germany's Federal Joint Committee as “a structured and legally binding cooperation between different professional groups and/or institutions in medical and non-medical care”. The nFC-isPO is part of the isPO project funded by the IF. It is implemented in four local cancer centres and is currently undergoing a continuous quality improvement process. As part of the isPO project the nFC-isPO is being evaluated by an independent institution: the Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Germany. The four-year isPO project was selected by the IF to be eligible for funding because it meets the requirements of the federal government's National Cancer Plan (NCP), in particular, the “further development of the oncological care structures and quality assurance" in the psycho-oncological domain. An independent evaluation is required by the IF to verify if the new form of care leads to an improvement in cross-sectoral care and to explore its potential for permanent integration into the German health care system. Methods The nFC-isPO consists of six components: a concept of care (C1), care pathways (C2), a psycho-oncological care network (C3), a care process organization plan (C4), an IT-supported documentation and assistance system (C5) and a quality management system (C6). The two components concept of care (C1) and care pathways (C2) represent the isPO clinical care program, according to which the individual cancer patients are offered psycho-oncological services within a period of 12 months after program enrolment following the diagnosis of cancer. The remaining components (C3-C6) represent the formal-administrative aspects of the nFC-isPO that are intended to meet the legally binding requirements of patient care in the German health care system. With the aim of systematic development of the nFC-isPO while at the same time enabling the external evaluators to examine its quality, effectiveness and efficiency under conditions of routine care, the project partners took into consideration approaches from translational psycho-oncology, practice-based health care research and program theory. In order to develop a structured, population-based isPO care program, reference was made to a specific program theory, to the stepped-care approach, and also to evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The basic version, nFC-isPO, was created over the first year after the start of the isPO project in October 2017, and has since been subject to a continuous quality improvement process. In 2019, the nFC-isPO was implemented at four local psycho-oncological care networks in the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia, in Germany. The legal basis of the implementation is a contract for "special care" with the German statutory health insurance funds according to state law (§ 140a SCB V; Social Code Book V for the statutory health insurance funds). Besides the accompanying external evaluation by the IMVR, the nFC-isPO is subjected to quarterly internal and cross-network quality assurance and improvement measures (internal evaluation) in order to ensure continuous quality improvement process. These quality management measures are developed and tested in the isPO project and are to be retained in order to ensure the sustainability of the quality of nFC-isPO for later dissemination into the German health care system. Discussion Demands on quality, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of in the German health care system are increasing, whereas financial resources are declining, especially for psychosocial services. At the same time, knowledge about evidence-based screening, assessment and intervention in cancer patients and about the provision of psychosocial oncological services is growing continuously. Due to the legal framework of the statutory health insurance in Germany, it has taken years to put sound psycho-oncological findings from research into practice. Ensuring the adequate and sustainable financing of a needs-oriented, psycho-oncological care approach for all newly diagnosed cancer patients, as required by the NCP, may still require many additional years. The aim of the isPO project is to develop a new form of psycho-oncological care for the individual and the population suffering from cancer, and to provide those responsible for German health policy with a sound basis for decision-making on the timely dissemination of psycho-oncological services in the German health care system. Trial registration The study was pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/DRKS00015326) under the following trial registration number: DRKS00015326; Date of registration: October 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kusch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Hildegard Labouvie
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vera Schiewer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalie Talalaev
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan C Cwik
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sonja Bussmann
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lusine Vaganian
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander L Gerlach
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antje Dresen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalia Cecon
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sandra Salm
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Theresia Krieger
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Pfaff
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Derendorf
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Samel
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Hagemeier
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Leicher
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Gregor Hültenschmidt
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jessica Swoboda
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Peter Haas
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Anna Arning
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Göttel
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Houwaart
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hedy Kerek-Bodden
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steffen Krebs
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiana Muth
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Reiser
- PIOH Köln - Praxis Internistischer Onkologie Und Hämatologie, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jürgen Wolf
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Castner J. Knowledge Translation of Science Advances Into Emergency Nursing Practice With the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Framework. J Emerg Nurs 2021; 46:141-146.e2. [PMID: 32164930 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
15
|
Andersen BL, Dorfman CS, Conley CC. Achieving oncology mental health providers' usage of an empirically supported treatment: Lessons learned. Psychooncology 2021; 30:794-803. [PMID: 33966323 PMCID: PMC8210804 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a need for oncology mental health providers to receive training to use empirically supported psychological treatments (ESTs) with their patients. The purpose of this editorial is to describe "lessons learned" from disseminating-conducting EST trainings-and supporting providers' capacity and confidence to use the EST. METHOD Processes and outcomes from conducting six, 3-days (18 h) EST training institutes from 2012-2016 are discussed. Institutes trained 166 full time oncology mental health providers from more than 100 different settings. The dissemination was intentionally designed to achieve EST implementation, i.e., therapists' sustained usage of the EST for at least 12 months post training. RESULTS Previously published discussion and findings show the effort was successful in achieving positive EST dissemination outcomes and sustained EST implementation by providers. Thus, "lessons learned" include discussions of (1) orientation to design education/training to achieve EST usage using theory based aims and outcomes of training efficacy; (2) multimodal, educational strategies used to achieve therapists' positive attitudes toward and self-efficacy to implement the EST; (3) guidance to therapists for adapting the EST to their practice settings while maintaining fidelity; (4) assistance to therapists to identify and problem solve implementation challenges; and (5) using patient reported outcome measures to determine clinical change. CONCLUSION Our discussion of the plan, methods, and goals of EST training contributes to the science of dissemination/implementation by providing support for (1) theory-informed EST dissemination, and (2) mechanisms of EST implementation. For researchers, our experience may guide future EST dissemination/implementation efforts in psycho-oncology. For therapists, lessons learned provide criteria for evaluating future continuing education options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline S. Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Claire C. Conley
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shaw J, Kamphuis H, Sharpe L, Lebel S, Smith AB, Hulbert-Williams N, Dhillon HM, Butow P. Setting an International Research Agenda for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Online Delphi Consensus Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:596682. [PMID: 33692719 PMCID: PMC7938308 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common amongst cancer survivors. There is rapidly growing research interest in FCR but a need to prioritize research to address the most pressing clinical issues and reduce duplication and fragmentation of effort. This study aimed to establish international consensus among clinical and academic FCR experts regarding priorities for FCR research. Methods Members of the International Psycho-oncology Society (IPOS) Fear of Cancer Recurrence Special Interest Group (FORwards) were invited to participate in an online Delphi study. Research domains identified in Round 1 were presented and discussed at a focus group (Round 2) to consolidate the domains and items prior to presentation in further survey rounds (Round 3) aimed at gaining consensus on research priorities of international significance. Results Thirty four research items were identified in Round 1 and 33 of the items were consolidated into six overarching themes through a focus group discussion with FCR experts. The 33 research items were presented in subsequent rounds of the delphi technique. Twenty one participants contributed to delphi round 1, 16 in round 2, and 25 and 29 participants for subsequent delphi rounds. Consensus was reached for 27 items in round 3.1. A further four research items were identified by panelists and included in round 3.2. After round 3.2, 35 individual research items were ratified by the panelists. Given the high levels of consensus and stability between rounds, no further rounds were conducted. Overall intervention research was considered the most important focus for FCR research. Panelists identified models of care that facilitate greater access to FCR treatment and evaluation of the effectiveness of FCR interventions in real world settings as the two research items of highest priority. Defining the mechanisms of action and active components across FCR/P interventions was the third highest priority identified. Conclusion The findings of this study outline a research agenda for international FCR research. Intervention research to identify models of care that increase access to treatment are based on a flexible approach based on symptom severity and can be delivered within routine clinical care were identified as research areas to prioritize. Greater understanding of the active components and mechanisms of action of existing FCR interventions will facilitate increased tailoring of interventions to meet patient need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Kamphuis
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Ben Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), South Western Sydney Clinical School, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hulbert-Williams
- Centre for Contextual Behavioural Science, School of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, United Kingdom
| | - Haryana Mary Dhillon
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Science, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ugalde A, Kiss N, Livingston PM, Rankin N. Commentary on 'Exclusion rates in randomized trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review'. Trials 2021; 22:76. [PMID: 33478574 PMCID: PMC7818727 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05019-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ugalde
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nicole Kiss
- Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Geelong, Australia.,Allied Health Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Patricia M Livingston
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Research in Implementation Science and e-Health (RISe) Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Piat M, Wainwright M, Sofouli E, Albert H, Casey R, Rivest MP, Briand C, Kasdorf S, Labonté L, LeBlanc S, O'Rourke JJ. The CFIR Card Game: a new approach for working with implementation teams to identify challenges and strategies. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:1. [PMID: 33413699 PMCID: PMC7791817 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00099-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the ERIC compilation of implementation strategies are key resources for identifying implementation barriers and strategies. However, their respective density and complexity make their application to implementation planning outside of academia challenging. We developed the CFIR Card Game as a way of working with multi-stakeholder implementation teams that were implementing mental health recovery into their services, to identify barriers and strategies to overcome them. The aim of this descriptive evaluation is to describe how the game was prepared, played, used and received by teams and researchers and their perception of the clarity of the CFIR constructs. METHODS We used the new CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool v.1 to design the game. We produced a deck of cards with each of the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool barrier narratives representing all 39 CFIR constructs. Teams played the game at the pre-implementation stage at a time when they were actively engaged in a planning process for implementing their selected recovery-oriented innovation. The teams placed each card in either the YES or NO column of the board in response to whether they anticipated experiencing this barrier in their setting. Teams were also asked about the clarity of the barrier narratives and were provided with plain language versions if unclear. Researchers completed a reflection form following the game, and participants completed an open-added questionnaire that included questions specific to the CFIR Card Game. We applied a descriptive coding approach to analysis. RESULTS Four descriptive themes emerged from this analysis: (1) the CFIR Card Game as a useful and engaging process, (2) difficulties understanding CFIR construct barrier narratives, (3) strengths of the game's design and structure and room for improvement and (4) mediating factors: facilitator preparation and multi-stakeholder dynamics. Quantitative findings regarding the clarity of the barrier narratives were integrated with qualitative data under theme 2. Only seven of the 39 original barrier narratives were judged to be clear by all teams. CONCLUSIONS The CFIR Card Game can be used to enhance implementation planning. Plain language versions of CFIR construct barrier narratives are needed. Our plain language versions require further testing and refining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myra Piat
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | - Eleni Sofouli
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hélène Albert
- École de Travail Social, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Regina Casey
- Department of Psychology, Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marie-Pier Rivest
- École de Travail Social, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Catherine Briand
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
| | - Sarah Kasdorf
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Lise Labonté
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Sébastien LeBlanc
- École de Travail Social, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Joseph J O'Rourke
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The utility of the implementation science framework "Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services" (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:3063-3071. [PMID: 33089474 PMCID: PMC8528793 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02669-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the utility of the implementation science framework "Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services" (i-PARIHS) for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a medical oncology outpatient department. The i-PARIHS framework identifies four core constructs for implementation, including Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients. METHODS A pilot study used the i-PARIHS framework to identify PROM implementation barriers and enablers to inform facilitation support strategies, such as training clinicians and staff, workflow support, technical support and audit and feedback. Pre- and post-implementation surveys were completed by 83 and 72 staff, respectively, (nurses, doctors and allied health), to assess perceived knowledge, enablers, barriers and utility of PROMs; and acceptability of the PROM intervention was also assessed post-implementation. RESULTS Important barriers included time constraints and previous experiences with technology. Enablers included good leadership support and a culture of learning. Facilitation strategies were used to overcome barriers identified in the i-PARIHS core domains. Compared to before the intervention, staff surveys showed improvement in perceived usefulness, perceived understanding and interpretation skills for PROMs. Staff perceptions about lack of time to use PROMs during visits remained a major perceived barrier post-implementation. CONCLUSION The i-PARIHS framework was useful for guiding the implementation of PROMs in routine oncology care. The four core i-PARIHS constructs (Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients) identified factors that directly impacted implementation, with Facilitation having a particularly important role to overcome these barriers. Oncology clinics and health systems considering implementing PROMs should consider having a dedicated Facilitator available during PROM implementation.
Collapse
|