Retrospective study of clinicopathologic features and prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus

Histology Shift in Esophageal Cancer Between Biopsies and Resections After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Pilot Study

Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection is the mainstay treatment for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. We recently observed the histology shift from predominant esophageal adenocarcinoma in the biopsy to neuroendocrine neoplasm with or without adenocarcinoma in the post-treatment resection. The underlying mechanism of this finding is uncertain, and there is limited information in the literature. A total of 11 patients were identified: 10 patients received presurgical chemoradiation and 1 with chemotherapy. All biopsies were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. When neuroendocrine immunomarkers were retrospectively performed on 5 biopsies, 2 showed focal positivity, although the classic neuroendocrine morphology was not readily appreciated. All resections contained neuroendocrine neoplasm, including 8 of well-differentiated type and 3 of neuroendocrine carcinomas. Two post-treatment esophagectomies consisted of neuroendocrine neoplasm only without residual adenocarcinoma. Upon follow-up, 8 patients died of the disease (median survival = 26 months), and 3 patients were alive after a median follow-up of 14 months. The overall median survival time was better than the reported esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (15 months). The 5-year observed survival rate was 11.3%, which was lower than the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 5-year survival rate of adenocarcinoma (21.8%). We reported a small series of esophageal adenocarcinoma that showed histology shift between biopsy and esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Our limited data suggest that prognosis of this group is different than the conventional adenocarcinoma. Awareness of this morphological change reminds pathologists to examine the biopsy specimens thoroughly, because recognition of neuroendocrine neoplasm, especially high-grade neuroendocrine component, might potentially affect pre- and post-surgical regimens.

Unveiling the Rarity: A Case of a Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Gastroesophageal Junction

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a rare group of heterogeneous tumors, consisting of an endocrine and a nonendocrine component, which can develop throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This case presents a 70-year-old man with a complex medical history who initially presented with an upper GI bleed. After being stabilized, he underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) that revealed a suspicious gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) mass. Histopathological studies paired with immunohistochemical investigations of the mass confirmed the rare diagnosis of MiNENs. He then underwent an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with subsequent chemotherapy and adjunct radiotherapy, with no recurrence noted on post-treatment surveillance. This case highlights the need for an EGD, histopathological examination, and immunohistochemical staining for detecting the underlying etiology of an upper GI bleed.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Early adenocarcinoma mixed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma component arising in the gastroesophageal junction: A case report

BACKGROUND

Early adenocarcinoma mixed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) component arising in the gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) region is rare and even rarer in young patients. Here, we report such a case in a 29-year-old Chinese man.

CASE SUMMARY

This patient presented to our hospital with a 3-mo history of dysphagia and regurgitation. Upper endoscopy revealed an elevated nodule in the distal esophagus 1.6 cm above the GEJ line, without Barrett's esophagus or involvement of the gastric cardia. The nodule was completely resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Pathological examination confirmed diagnosis of intramucosal adenocarcinoma mixed with an NEC component, measuring 1.5 cm. Immunohistochemically, both adenocarcinoma and NEC components were positive for P53 with a Ki67 index of 90%; NEC was positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin. Next-generation sequencing of 196 genes demonstrated a novel germline mutation of the ERCC3 gene in the DNA repair pathway and a germline mutation of the RNF43 gene, a common gastric cancer driver gene, in addition to pathogenic somatic mutations in P53 and CHEK2 genes. The patient was alive without evidence of the disease 36 mo after ESD.

CONCLUSION

Early adenocarcinoma with an NEC component arising in the distal esophageal side of the GEJ region showed evidence of gastric origin.

Pathologic Features of Miscellaneous Foregut Malignancies

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of tumors that can occur in almost any organ and share a common neuroendocrine phenotype.

The different prognostic factors between metastatic and nonmetastatic disease of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

PURPOSE

The specific risk factors of metastatic and nonmetastatic esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) are still uncertain. Whether primary site surgery is necessary for all patients with esophageal NEC is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal NEC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2014 were selected. STATA 12 was used to analyze the clinical and pathological features of esophageal NEC.

RESULTS

In total, 241 patients with esophageal NEC were included. Metastatic patients had shorter overall survival than nonmetastatic patients (6.03 versus 11.90 months, respectively). Prognostic factors varied between metastatic and nonmetastatic esophageal NEC. The location of the primary tumor is a key point for the prognosis of esophageal NEC. For nonmetastatic esophageal NEC, patients with tumors in the upper third of the esophagus had the worst survival, and patients with metastatic esophageal NEC with a primary tumor in the lower part of the esophagus tended to have an increased risk of death. Moreover, age ≥68 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-3.31; P < 0.01) and large cell carcinoma (HR = 2.79; 95% CI: 1.30-6.00; P < 0.01) were independent risk factors in patients with metastatic esophageal NEC. Primary site resection benefited patients with nonmetastatic esophageal NEC (HR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.07-0.56; P < 0.01) rather than patients with metastatic esophageal NEC (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.29-2.83; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presented that primary tumor location is an important risk factor for nonmetastatic esophageal NEC patients. Age and pathological type are important risk factors for patients with metastatic esophageal NEC. Nonmetastatic esophageal NEC will benefit from primary tumor resection. Systematic treatment is recommended for metastatic esophageal NEC.

High-Grade Pure Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Arising From Barrett's Mucosa: A Rare Phenomenon

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (E-NEC) is a very rare neuroendocrine tumor. There are only a few case reports where pure esophageal NEC is found to be arising from Barett's mucosa. Here we present a case of high-grade pure E-NEC arising from Barrett's esophagus, which was metastasized to the liver at the time of diagnosis.

Combined tubular adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation arising in Barrett esophagus

Adenocarcinoma (AC) with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) or enteroblastic (ENT) differentiation rarely develops in Barrett's esophagus (BE). A 76-year-old man was diagnosed with Barrett's AC (cT1bN0M0) and underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. A type 0-IIc + 0-Is lesion measuring 26 × 21 mm was macroscopically observed on a background of long segment BE (pT1bN0M0). The tumor comprised three different histological types of carcinoma (NEC, AC with ENT differentiation and moderately differentiated AC). NEC showed positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A and insulinoma-associated protein 1 with a Ki-67 index of 60.6%. ENT tumors were immunopositive for AFP and sal-like protein 4, and focally immunopositive for human chorionic gonadotrophin. The amounts of NEC, ENT and AC were 40%, 40% and 20%, respectively. p53 expression was positive throughout the tumor. Rb expression was negative at the NEC, but positive at the ENT and AC. CD4 and CD8 densities were lower in the NEC segment than in the AC and ENT segments, and PD-L1 expression was negative throughout the tumor. Early cancer arising in BE with a combination of tubular AC, ENT tumors and NEC is very rare. Our observations might contribute to understanding the carcinogenetic pathways and tumor microenvironment of NEC and ENT tumors.

Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in esophageal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: A bicenter retrospective study

Objective

The aim of this bicentric retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with esophageal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECs).

Methods

From the database of two centers, 28 patients affected by esophageal high-grade NECs who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, tumor-to-blood-pool SUV ratio (TBR), tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) of the primary tumor were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

After a median follow-up period of 22 months, disease progression occurred in 11 (39.3%) patients, and death occurred in 8 (28.6%) patients. The median PFS was 34 months, and the median OS was not reached. Univariate analyses revealed that among metabolic parameters, only MTV and TLG were significant prognostic factors, while among clinical variables, only distant metastasis was a significant factor for both PFS and OS (P&lt; 0.05). On multivariate analyses, MTV and TLG were independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS (P&lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients with esophageal high-grade NEC, MTV and TLG measured on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT are independently prognostic factors for predicting PFS and OS, and might be used as quantitative prognostic imaging biomarkers.

Analysis of the Clinicopathological Characteristics, Prognosis, and Lymphocyte Infiltration of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Surgery-Based Cohort and Propensity-Score Matching Study

Background: Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (E-NENs) are a rare and poorly reported subtype of esophageal carcinoma. We analyzed the differences in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between E-NENs and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 3620 patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled retrospectively. The study cohort was divided into two groups (E-NENs and ESCC) through propensity-score matching, and the prognosis and TILs were compared between the two groups. The TILs were assessed using tumor specimens (including six cases of ESCC, six cases of neuroendocrine carcinomas [NECs], and six cases of mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms [MiNENs]). Results: E-NENs accounted for 3.0% (107/3620) of cases, among which there were just 3 neuroendocrine tumor cases, 51 NEC cases, and 53 MiNENs cases. After matching, esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (E-NECs) showed both poorer 5-year overall survival (OS; 35.4% vs. 54.8%, p = 0.0019) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 29.3% vs. 48.9%, p < 0.001) compared with ESCC. However, the differences were not prominent in the subgroup with stage I. No significant survival benefit was observed for E-NECs with multimodal therapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that E-NECs are an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. In the exploratory analysis, E-NECs were associated with less infiltration of immune cells compared with ESCC. Conclusion: E-NECs are significantly associated with a poorer prognosis than ESCC except for early-stage disease. The fewer TILs within the tumor microenvironment of E-NECs compared with ESCC results in weaker anti-tumor immunity and may lead to a poorer prognosis.

Management of Appendix Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Insights on the Current Guidelines

Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANENs) usually present as incidental findings at the time of appendectomy for acute appendicitis. They are rare, accounting for only 0.5-1% of intestinal neoplasms; they are found in 0.3-0.9% of all appendectomy specimens. They are usually sporadic tumors. There are several histological types including well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). Histologic differentiation and the grade of well-differentiated NETs correlate with clinical behavior and prognosis. Management varies based on differentiation, aggressiveness, and metastatic potential. There is debate about the optimal surgical management for localized appendiceal NETs that are impacted by many factors including the tumor size, the extent of mesoappendiceal spread, lymphovascular invasion and perineural involvement. In addition, the data to guide therapy in metastatic disease are limited due to the paucity of these tumors. Here, we review the current advances in the management of ANENs within the context of a multidisciplinary approach to these tumors.

Oesophageal neuroendocrine tumours-case series of a rare malignancy

Oesophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are the highest grade of NENs, with aggressive biological behaviour and poor outcomes. No standardized treatment pathways exist for these tumours, with management being individualized based on patient and tumour factors. We present five cases, four men and one women between 63 and 68 years old, who were diagnosed with symptomatic primary oesophageal NECs. Three were diagnosed with localized disease, and two were diagnosed with metastatic disease. Endoscopy, biopsy and staging scan results are outlined. Two patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients with localized disease underwent oesophagectomy. Two of these patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients have succumbed to their disease, with a median survival following a diagnosis of 18 months (5-34 months). This case series highlights the variability of presentation and stage at diagnosis of oesophageal NECs. Multimodal treatment is commonly utilized; however, outcomes are universally poor. Further research is required to determine the optimal treatment regimen for oesophageal NENS.

Mixed neuroendocrine–non‐neuroendocrine neoplasm arising from long‐segment Barrettʼs esophagus showing exceptionally aggressive clinical behavior

Background

Case

Conclusion

Comprehensive Clinical Analysis of Gallbladder Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Large-Volume Multicenter Study During One Decade

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and therapeutic situations of gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms (GB-NENs) in the real world via a multicenter, large-scale cohort study.

METHODS

The study searched for patients in 143 hospitals in China and enrolled 154 patients with GB-NENs diagnosed in 40 hospitals between 2004 and 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics and therapeutic approaches were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median age at the initial diagnosis of the patients with GB-NENs was 63 years (range 33-83 years), and 61.7% of the patients were women. Tumor-node-metastasis staging classified 92 patients as stage 3 or above. Based on the 2019 World Health Organization classification, 96 cases (62.3%) were confirmed pathologically as poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, 13 cases (8.4%) as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, and 45 cases as mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. The liver was the most frequent metastatic site. Immunohistochemistry showed that synaptophysin was most frequently positive (80.4%), followed by chromogranin A (61.7%), and CD56 (58.4%). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed more common clear boundaries (25/39 cases) and invasive growth features (27 cases). None of these cases had an accurate diagnosis before surgery, with a misdiagnosis rate of 100%. Surgical resection is the main treatment, and platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens were preferred as adjuvant therapies for patients with GB-NENs. The available survival data for 74 patients showed an overall survival rate of 59% at 1 year, 33% at 3 years, and 29% at 5 years. No significant difference was found between the patients treated with and those treated without adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms have high malignancy and a poor prognosis. Importantly, this large-scale cohort study significantly improves our understanding of GB-NENs and will benefit the exploration of its mechanism and treatment modes. Further investigation is necessary to explore the management of this disease.

Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival trends in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an extremely rare type of malignancy. Clinical data of ENEC are limited to case reports and case series. More information is needed on its clinical feature, management, and prognosis.

METHODS

This study collected information of ENEC patients diagnosed pathologically from 2010 to 2018. Data including demographic information, clinical features, and survival trends were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA/SE 15.1, SPSS 25.0, and GraphPad Prism 8.

RESULTS

A total of 283 ENEC patients were included in this study. The small-cell and large-cell subtypes of ENEC possess similar clinical features. The lower third of the esophagus (58%) was the most common location of ENEC. At the time of diagnosis, most ENEC patients were AJCC 7th stage IV (48.1%). Metastasis occurred in more than half of the ENEC patients (53.4%), and the most common metastatic site was the liver (37.1%). Compared with poorly differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), another aggressive malignancy of the esophagus sometimes confused with ENEC because of similar histological features, our study showed differences in tumor location and metastatic rate, but similar poor survival rates. Multivariate survival analysis showed that ENEC located at the middle third of esophagus (p = 0.013), "Brain metastasis" (p = 0.019), and "Liver metastasis" (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of worse outcomes. "Surgery" (p = 0.003), and "Chemotherapy" (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with newly diagnosed ENEC presented with metastatic disease. Predictors of poor survival included tumor location, brain metastasis, and liver metastasis. ENEC and poorly differentiated ESCC share certain histological features, but differ in tumor location and metastatic rate. Yet, no standard treatment strategy has been established, but surgery and chemotherapy were related to better outcomes.

Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

In the 2019 WHO guidelines, the classification of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) has changed from one being based on Ki-67 proliferation index alone to one that also includes tumor differentiation. Consequently, GEP NENs are now classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), NET G1 (Ki-67 <3%), NET G2 (Ki-67 3-20%) and NET G3 (Ki-67 >20%), and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (Ki-67 >20%). It has been suggested that NET G3 should be treated as NET G2 with respect to surgery, while surgical management of NEC should be expanded from local disease to also include patients with advanced disease where curative surgery is possible. High grade mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) have a neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component mostly with a poor prognosis. All studies evaluating the effect of surgery in NEC and MiNEN are observational and hold a risk of selection bias, which may overestimate the beneficial effect of surgery. Further, only a few studies on the effect of surgery in MiNEN exist. This review aims to summarize the data on the outcome of surgery in patients with GEP NET G3, GEP NEC and high grade MiNEN. The current evidence suggests that patients with NEN G3 and localized disease and NEN G3 patients with metastatic disease where curative surgery can be achieved may benefit from surgery. In patients with MiNEN, it is currently not possible to evaluate on the potential beneficial effect of surgery due to the low number of studies.

Large-Cell Esophageal Neuroendocrine Tumor Leading to Hepatorenal Syndrome

Neuroendocrine tumors are tumors that arise from the enterochromaffin cells in the neuroendocrine tissue found throughout the body, particularly the digestive tract, pancreas, and thymus. Neuroendocrine tumors of the esophagus are extremely rare and highly aggressive in nature. We present the case of a 55-year-old Hispanic male who initially presented to the emergency department with right-sided abdominal pain. Imaging revealed innumerable lesions occupying half of the liver parenchyma. Subsequent endoscopy with biopsy of the esophageal and liver lesions along with immunohistochemistry staining was suggestive of a large cell neuroendocrine tumor. He later presented with generalized weakness and right-sided abdominal pain with worsening hepatic and renal function. Over the course of the patient's stay in the hospital, his mental status progressively deteriorated. Given the deranged hepatic and renal function, chemotherapy could not be initiated. The patient's family decided against hemodialysis considering his poor prognosis and the patient expired on day 15 of admission. The case report highlights the aggressiveness of one of the rare esophageal malignancies. It is crucial to establish diagnosis at the earlier stages of the disease with prompt treatment in order to avoid serious complications such as hepatorenal syndrome, which resulted in rapid deterioration of our patient's clinical status. More research is necessary in order to establish guidelines to treat neuroendocrine tumors of the esophagus.

Clinicopathological analysis of 67 cases of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on prognosis

The clinicopathological properties of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) and its optimal therapy have not been widely studied, as the disease is not common. Consequently, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the clinical features as well as the prognosis of patients with surgically resected ENEC.The clinicopathological data of patients with ENEC who underwent esophagostomy with regional lymphadenectomy at Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Jiangsu Provincial Tumor Hospital starting January 2008 until December 2014 were collected.Ninety-two cases of ENEC were part of this study. However, only 67 patients were analyzed and followed up. A univariate model for the Cox proportional hazards revealed that prognosis was associated with postoperative adjuvant therapy, age, and lymph node metastasis (P < .05); a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that postoperative adjuvant therapy was a significant independent prognostic factor. Postoperative adjuvant therapy directly affected overall survival, with a significant disparity noted between the groups (P = .022). In this study, patients who received adjuvant therapy had an average time of survival of 39 months (interquartile range: 27.068-50.932 months), while those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had an average survival time of 13 months (interquartile range: 10.129-15.871 months). The survival time was longer in the treated group than in the untreated group (hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.94; P = .034).ENEC is a heterogeneous tumor with a very poor prognosis. Combining surgery with adjuvant and/or chemotherapy significantly prolongs the survival of patients, and the optimal treatment for ENEC should be determined with future prospective studies.

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: A single-institute study of 43 cases

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the gastrointestinal tract.

DESIGN

A total of 43 cases were identified and reassessed based on modern classification.

RESULTS

The cohort (27M, 16F; median age: 66 years) included 16 (37%) large cell NEC, 12 (28%) small cell NEC, 5 (12%) NEC not otherwise specified, and 10 (23%) mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas. Tumor predominantly involved the colon (n = 14, 33%), rectum (n = 13, 30%), and esophagus (n = 9, 21%). Immunohistochemically, INSM1 was the most sensitive marker for neuroendocrine differentiation (28/28, 100%), followed by synaptophysin (40/43, 93%), CD56 (22/35, 63%), and chromogranin (18/40, 45%). SATB2, CDX2, CK20, CK7, abnormal p53, and PD-L1 was positive in 21/26 (81%), 26/37 (70%), 11/35 (31%), 10/35 (29%), 19/24 (79%), and 12/23 (52%) cases, respectively. Three of 25 (11%) were mismatch repair protein deficient. Of 21 resected tumors, 19 (90%) were ≥ pT3 and 13 (62%) had nodal metastasis. Twenty-eight (65%) had distant metastasis. The 5-year survival rate was 21%. The prognosis was stage dependent (p < 0.05), but not associated with tumor type, location, or specific immunomarkers.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal NECs are aggressive neoplasms. INSM1, synaptophysin, and SATB2 are sensitive markers, although not site or tumor type specific.

What is New in the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System: Review of Selected Updates on Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Appendiceal Tumors, and Molecular Testing

CONTEXT.—

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system tumors discusses several advancements and developments in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of several digestive tract tumors.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a summary of the updates with a focus on neuroendocrine neoplasms, appendiceal tumors, and the molecular advances in tumors of the digestive system.

DATA SOURCES.—

English literature and personal experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Some of the particularly important updates in the 5th edition are the alterations made in the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, understanding of pathogenesis of appendiceal tumors and their precursor lesions, and the expanded role of molecular pathology in establishing an accurate diagnosis or predicting prognosis and response to treatment.

Nationwide survey of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter study conducted among institutions accredited by the Japan Esophageal Society

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an extremely rare type of tumor characterized by a high malignant potential, rapid growth, and poor prognosis. Because the standard therapy for ENEC has been poorly defined, we herein aimed to attain a clear view of the current state of treatment for ENEC by performing a large-scale, multicenter study.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire-based, retrospective clinical review of 142 patients with ENEC treated at 37 hospitals accredited by the Japan Esophageal Society from January 2010 to December 2015.

RESULTS

The most frequent main treatment performed was an operation, followed by chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Among the 67 patients who underwent surgery, 28 (19.7%) were not accurately diagnosed with NEC or a combined NEC tumor by pretreatment biopsy. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 33.2%. Among patients with Stages III and IV disease, the prognosis was significantly better in patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy than in patients who underwent other treatments. Among patients with Stages I and II disease, however, there was no difference in survival rates between those who underwent surgery and chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide survey is a valuable report of the current status of treatment of ENEC in a limited number of cases experienced at each participating institution. The survival benefit obtained from surgery was considered to be limited, especially for Stages III and IV ENEC. Accurate pretreatment histological diagnosis is essential to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with ENEC.

Use of Chemoradiotherapy as a Treatment Option for Patients with Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Purpose

Currently, there are no standard treatments for primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE), particularly in cases of limited-stage disease. This retrospective study aimed to assess the treatment strategies and the relevant prognostic factors of limited-stage PSCCE (LS-PSCCE).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 129 patients with LS-PSCCE between June 2009 and December 2018. The χ2 test was performed to examine the frequencies between different groups. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to estimate and compare survival rates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Results

Through a median follow-up of 23 months, the median OS of all patients was 25.0 months and the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 15.0 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that alcohol abuse (p=0.046) and TNM stage (p<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS rates between the patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and those treated with surgery and chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (S+CT±RT) (p>0.05). Patients who received concurrent CRT had better OS and RFS than those who received sequential CRT (p<0.05). Postoperative adjuvant RT for high-risk patients can further improve the local control rate but has no significant effect on OS.

Conclusion

LS-PSCCE patients treated with CRT had similar OS and RFS compared to those treated with S+CT±RT. This study shows that concurrent CRT confers a survival advantage for patients with LS-PSCCE compared to those with sequential CRT.

Preoperatively Treated Diffuse-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Glucose vs. Other Energy Sources Substantially Influence Prognosis and Therapy Response

Simple Summary

The diffuse type of gastric adenocarcinoma (dGAC) generally confers a poor prognosis compared to intestinal type. Some dGACs are not avid on fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET (FDG-PET) while others seem to consume glucose avidly. We analyzed the outcomes based on the avidity of the primary on baseline FDG-PET. Our data suggest that if dGACs used glucose as an energy source then the prognosis was very poor while non-glucose sources improved prognosis. Multi-platform (including metabolomics) profiling of dGACs would yield useful biologic understanding.

Abstract

Diffuse type of gastric adenocarcinoma (dGAC) generally confers a poor prognosis compared to intestinal type. Some dGACs are not avid on fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET (FDG-PET) while others seem to consume glucose avidly. We analyzed the outcomes based on the avidity (high with standardized uptake value (SUV) > 3.5 or low with SUV ≤ 3.5) of the primary on baseline FDG-PET. We retrospectively selected 111 localized dGAC patients who had baseline FDG-PET (all were treated with preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation). FDG-PET avidity was compared with overall survival (OS) and response to therapy. The mean age was 59.4 years and with many females (47.7%). The high-SUV group (58 (52.3%) patients) and the low-SUV group (53 (47.7%) patients) were equally divided. While the median OS for all patients was 49.5 months (95% CI: 38.5–98.8 months), it was 98.0 months (95% CI: 49.5–NE months) for the low-SUV group and 36.0 months for the high-SUV (p = 0.003). While the median DFS for all patients was 38.2 months (95% CI: 27.7–97.6 months), it was 98.0 (95% CI: 36.9–NE months) months for the low-SUV group was and only 27.0 months (95% CI: 15.2–63.2 months) for the high-SUV group (p = 0.005). Clinical responses before surgery were more common in the low-SUV group but overall we observed only 4 pathologic complete responses in 111 patients. Our unique data suggest that if dGACs used glucose as an energy source then the prognosis was very poor while non-glucose sources improved prognosis. Multi-platform (including metabolomics) profiling of dGACs would yield useful biologic understanding.

Immunohistochemical Staining With Neuroendocrine Markers is Essential in the Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Esophagogastric Junction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are uncommon and the classification of these tumors has been revised several times. Since 2016, at the Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, all adenocarcinomas and poorly differentiated carcinomas of the EGJ have been stained routinely with the neuroendocrine markers, synaptophysin and chromogranin A, to detect a possible neuroendocrine component. This study aimed to determine if routine immunohistochemical staining is necessary to detect neuroendocrine differentiation of the EGJ tumors by evaluating how often a neuroendocrine component of the tumors was correctly identified or missed on routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, and by evaluating the interobserver agreement among several pathologists. Of 262 cases a NEN was identified in 24 (9.2%). Up to 22.7% of all EGJ NENs would have been missed without routinely performed neuroendocrine staining in all EGJ tumors. The interobserver agreement between 3 pathologists was slight to moderate. In conclusion, immunohistochemical staining with neuroendocrine markers is essential for the diagnosis of NENs, and to detect all NENs, we recommend to perform this routinely on all resected tumors of the EGJ.

Looking into digestive mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms: subtypes, prognosis, and predictive factors

Mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive system represent a challenge for both pathologists and clinicians. Their nomenclature has changed several times, and their diagnostic criteria, classification and clinical behaviour have been matter of debate over the years. Although several attempts have been made to elucidate the pathogenesis and biology of MiNENs, some issues remain open. This review will provide: a historical background that helps in understanding the evolution of the concept and nomenclature of mixed neoplasms; a revision of the knowledge on this topic, including molecular aspects, to give the reader a comprehensive and practical overview on this challenging field of pathology; a focus on the diagnostic criteria and on the determination of prognostic and predictive factors; and a description of the different tumour types in the different sites of origin.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma: a case report

Neuroendocrine carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is rare and its developmental mechanisms remain unclear. Neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus with adenocarcinoma was detected at an early stage and resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Detailed pathological examination revealed that the neuroendocrine carcinoma originated via differentiation of the preexisting adenocarcinoma. A 79-year-old man presented with a flat protruding lesion in the esophagogastric junction. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a red flat 10-mm protruding lesion in the Barrett's epithelium and a shallow depression at the distal end. Narrow band imaging with magnification showed that the blood vessels in the protrusion were dilated and meandered irregularly, while those in the depression were small and did not form a network; the blood vessels were missing in some parts of the depression. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed after analysis of the biopsy specimen of the protrusion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine carcinoma with an adenocarcinoma component.

Clinicopathological features and outcome of esophageal neuroendocrine tumor: A retrospective multicenter survey by the digestive endoscopy society of Taiwan

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are very rare and mostly carcinomic, carrying poor prognosis. There is still no guideline or consensus on the treatment for esophageal NET.

METHODS

Patients with histologically-proven esophageal neuroendocrine tumor were recruited from 9 hospitals in Taiwan between 2002 and 2017. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, endoscopic, pathological data, treatment strategies, follow-up periods, and survivals were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

In total, 39 esophageal NET were analyzed and 38 were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Sixteen (41%) patients had mixed components with either adenocarcinoma (N = 9, 23%) or squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) (N = 7, 18%). 64.1% of the patients experienced dysphagia and ulcerative mass was the most comment endoscopic finding. There was a higher proportion of drinkers (54.1%), betel chewers (21.6%) and smokers (64.9%) among the patients than in the general population in Taiwan. Five patients (12.8%) had been diagnosed with other cancers. Definite chemoradiotherapy (N = 14, 35.9%) and surgery (N = 7, 17.9%) were the major treatment. Patients with Ki-67% above the median level (50%) in the tumors tended to have worse survival (P = 0.06). However, presence of mixed component was not a significant survival predictor in our study (P = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Mixed component of an esophageal NET is commonly observed. Staged workup and the principle of treatment can follow that for the common cancer type of esophagus. The risk factors and behaviors of esophageal NEC in Taiwan seem to be similar to that of esophageal SCC.

Validation and proposed modification of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for patients with esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms: Evaluation of a revised lymph node classification

There is currently no universally accepted staging system for esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ENENs). In the present study, patients with ENENs, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (SEER) (n=191 patients) and the multicentric series (n=51 patients), were stratified to assess the validity of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems, particularly for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess disease-specific survival (DSS), according to the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) status, and the Cox model was applied to evaluate differences in prognosis after adjustment for potential confounders. For the 8th AJCC staging classifications, only the pathological stage groups (pTNM) conferred increased hazard ratios from stage I to stage IV, with overlaps between adjacent stages. According to the current findings, the regional lymph nodes involvement status other than the current N classification was a significant predictor of DSS. Consequently, a revised N(Nr) classification was proposed and therefore a new TNrM staging system was adopted, for which progressively poorer DSS associated with increasing stage was observed. Moreover, the concordance index with the modified staging system was slightly higher in patients with ENENs from the SEER registry compared with that of the 8th pTNM system. In conclusion, lymph node status, rather than the number of positive lymph nodes, was a marker of poorer DSS and the modified staging system provided an easier and more accurate staging tool. The present results indicate that revisions to the current staging classifications may be improve the assessment of patient prognosis.

Gastrointestinal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: a population level analysis of epidemiological trends

Background

The rise in incidence and mortality of gastrointestinal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) has not been well focused. The aim of our study was to examine epidemiological trends in incidence and incidence-based (IB) mortality of gastrointestinal MANEC at a population level.

Methods

The incidence and IB mortality of gastrointestinal MANEC as well as data on affected patients from 2000 to 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Trends in incidence and IB mortality were assessed using Joinpoint regression. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of mortality.

Results

581 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal MANEC were enrolled. Gastrointestinal MANEC incidence was 0.23 cases per 1,000,000 individuals in 2000 and 1.16 cases per 1,000,000 individuals in 2016, with an annual percent change (APC) of 8.0% (95% CI 5.7–10.3%, P < 0.05). IB mortality also showed a sustained increase (APC 12.9%, 95% CI 9.0–16.8%, P < 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, age at diagnosis, tumor grade and stage, lymph node metastasis, surgery, and tumor size were independently associated with mortality. Median survival was 75 months (95% CI 60–128 months). Median survival of appendiceal MANEC was significantly longer than that of cecal MANEC (115 vs. 31 months; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

We found a sustained and rapid increase both in incidence and IB mortality of gastrointestinal MANEC, manifesting that there has been no significant improvement in patient outcomes, nor progress in prevention and treatment. Additional resources should be devoted to gastrointestinal MANEC research.

Population-based analysis of esophageal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma between 2004 and 2015

Background

Esophageal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (ELCNC) seems a rarely gastrointestinal malignancy. By far, its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis have not been deeply studied.

Methods

The data of patients having ELCNC was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, then assessed and compared with information from patients with esophageal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (ESCNC) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We used univariate and multivariate analyses to accurately detect independent prognostic factors.

Results

The data of 36 patients for ELCNC were obtained between 2004 and 2015. Compared with patients with ESCNC and ESCC, the mean survival time of ECLNC patients was worse than those with ESCC, while similar to ESCNC. Thus, ELCNC had significantly different clinicopathological characteristics compared to ESCNC and ESCC. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age (P=0.001) and M stage (P=0.004) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

ELCNC is a rare subtype of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The clinicopathological features differ from those of other esophageal carcinomas. Prognosis may be closely related to age and M stage.

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the upper digestive tract

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus and the stomach is aggressive. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Both clinicopathological factors and treatment results were examined in 34 patients with immunohistochemically diagnosed NEC of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus 22; stomach 12).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine tumors showed protruding and localized type, like submucosal tumor. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in six and eight patients, respectively. Among the six patients with esophageal NEC, three with node metastasis developed recurrence within seven months, while the other three (pT1bN0) had no recurrence. Regarding gastric NEC, three patients with pT3N1 or 2 tumor received adjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a 5-year survival. However, the other five experienced recurrence after gastrectomy. Systemic chemotherapy was performed as the main treatment for 18 patients with advanced NEC. The median survival was 10 months after initial chemotherapy. No marked differences in the response were recognized between the 14 cases with esophageal NEC and the 4 with gastric NEC. The median survival was 14.3 and 5.3 months for the 11 effective and 7 non-effective patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A macroscopically unique appearance, like submucosal tumor, suggests the possibility of NEC. Esophagectomy is an effective treatment option for limited-stage NEC without node metastasis, while gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective for NEC even with node metastasis when R0 resection can be achieved. Systemic chemotherapy is relatively effective for advanced NEC, although early progression frequently develops.

Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

This review is based on a presentation given at the Hans Popper Hepatopathology Society companion meeting at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting. It presents updates on the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with an emphasis on the role of immunohistochemistry. Neuroendocrine neoplasms often present in liver biopsies as metastases of occult origin. Specific topics covered include 1. general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, 2. general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, with discussion of the emerging marker INSM1, 3. non-small cell carcinoma with (occult) neuroendocrine differentiation, 4. the WHO Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with discussion of the 2019 classification of gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms, 5. use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, 6. immunohistochemistry to assign site of origin in neuroendocrine metastasis of occult origin, 7. immunohistochemistry to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, 8. lesions frequently misdiagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and 9. required and recommended data elements for biopsies and resections with associated immunohistochemical stains. Next-generation immunohistochemistry, including lineage-restricted transcription factors (e.g., CDX2, islet 1, OTP, SATB2) and protein correlates of molecular genetic events (e.g., p53, Rb), is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis and classification of these neoplasms.

Do neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract have the same prognosis? A SEER database analysis of 12,878 cases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are both rare and malignant; however, it is unclear whether their prognosis is the same.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 12,878 patients with NEC or MiNEN in the GI tract were reviewed retrospectively by searching the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Next, we compared the characteristics and survival between patients with NEC or MiNEN and further analyzed the prognostic factors for the patients.

RESULTS

The data showed that patients with MiNEN had a worse prognosis as compared with patients with pure NEC in the small intestine (SI) and appendix, whereas there was no significant survival difference between NEC and MiNEN in the other parts of the GI system. On the whole, age ⩾55 years (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.002), being diagnosed at TNM Stage II-IV (p < 0.0001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.0001) were the independent negative prognostic factors for NEC patients, whereas age ⩾55 years (p = 0.003), being diagnosed at TNM Stage III-IV (p < 0.001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001) were identified as the independent negative prognostic factors for the MiNEN patients. Furthermore, when NECs or MiNENs were classified based on the primary tumor site, the results showed that the prognostic factors for NEC and MiNEN varied between the tumor sites.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic differences between NECs and MiNENs in the GI tract are heterogeneous and site-related. Patients with appendiceal or SI MiNEN have a poorer prognosis than patients with pure appendiceal or SI NEC. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with MiNEN in the SI and appendix and monitor them more closely.

A competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis for cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

The objective of this study is to estimate the probability of cause-specific mortality using a competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis in a large population-based cohort of patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The surveillance, epidemiology and end results database was used to identify 162 patients diagnosed with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma from 1998 to 2014. We estimated a cumulative incidence function for cause-specific mortality. A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional subdistribution hazard model, validated using bootstrap cross-validation, and evaluated with a decision curve analysis to assess its clinical utility. Finally, we performed risk stratification using a recursive partitioning analysis to divide patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma into clinically useful prognostic groups. Tumor location, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with cause-specific mortality. The calibration plots demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes. The discrimination performance of a Fine-Gray model was evaluated by using the c-index, which was 0.723 for cause-specific mortality. The decision curve analysis ranged from 0.268 to 0.968 for the threshold probability at which the risk model provided net clinical benefits relative to hypothetical all-screening and no-screening scenarios. The risk groups stratified by a recursive partitioning analysis allowed significant distinction between cumulative incidence curves. We determined the probability of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and developed a nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis stratification system based on a competing-risks model. The nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis appear to be suitable for risk stratification of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and will help clinicians to identify patients at increased risk of cause-specific mortality to guide treatment and surveillance decisions.

The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: a single-center study of 53 resection cases

Background

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are exceedingly rare and poorly understood. The aims of the retrospective study were to delineate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with the disease.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study containing 53 patients of esophageal NECs in our center from 2002 through 2018. Patients were assigned to the pure esophageal NECs group and the esophageal NECs mixed with squamous carcinoma and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (MiNECs) group. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and prognostic factors were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Of the 53 patients, elderly male patients were predominant. Dysphagia was the most common symptom (45/53, 84.9%). Most tumors were centered in the middle esophagus (36/53,67.9%).Ulcerated appearance was frequently seen in the pure NECs (56.8%), and the tumors in the MiNECs group mostly represented elevated types (57.9%). Synaptophysin (38/45, 84.4%), chromogranin A (21/38, 55.3%) and CD56(23/27, 85.2%) have been proven to be positive markers for NECs. Most patients (46/53, 86.8%) received surgery combined with chemotherapy. Though the pathologic stages were alike (P = 0.129), the median survival time was 3.53 years for the pure NECs group and 7 years for the MiNECs group. In multivariate analysis, pathologic stage (RR = 1.938, P = 0.045) and age (RR = 2.410, P = 0.028) were independent prognostic factors for patients with MiNECs. The prognosis of patients with pure NECs was independent from any factors.

Conclusions

Careful endoscopic examination could help distinguish pure NECs from MiNECs. NECs were aggressive, but a relative better prognosis for patients with MiNECs. Surgery should be performed if applicable, and chemotherapy might be helpful.

Paired Box 5 (PAX5) Expression in Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tract: Diagnostic and Potentially Therapeutic Implications

Paired Box 5 (PAX5), a well-established B-cell marker, is preferentially expressed in small cell lung carcinoma and regulates the transcription of c-Met, offering a potential for therapeutic target. Its expression in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) of the digestive system has not been systemically evaluated. Archived pathology materials from 38 PDNEC in the gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary (PB) tract were reviewed. Representative tumor sections were subject to immunohistochemical stain for PAX5, c-Met, and CD20. The extent of the staining [focal (<10%), patchy (10% to 50%), and diffuse (>50%)] and intensity (1+ to 3+) was evaluated. In total, 38 cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors from GI/PB tract served as controls. Nuclear PAX5 staining was observed in 16 (42%) cases in total, in 46% (11/24) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 67% (4/6) of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 13% (1/8) of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, with diffuse (8), patchy (4), or focal (4) staining. The intensity was 3+ (2), 2+ (6), and 1+ (8). PAX5 expression was common in ampullary (4/5) and gastroesophageal junctional/esophageal (5/9) PDNEC. Two (5%) of 38 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were positive for PAX5. Three PAX5 positive PDNEC showed weak cytoplasmic c-Met immunolabeling. CD20 was negative in all tumors. Our data show that PAX5 is commonly expressed in PDNEC of the GI/PB tract including small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. This observation warrants a cautious approach when interpreting small biopsy of poorly differentiated neoplasms, especially when lymphoma is considered in the differentials. Further study of PAX5/c-Met signaling pathway and its potential therapeutic value in GI/PB PDNEC is warranted.

Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Esophagus Observed with Annual Endoscopy for Three Years

An 80-year-old man was found to have a reddish depressed lesion on the middle thoracic esophagus. The morphology of the lesion had been almost unchanged for 3 years, but it transformed to a 2-cm depressed lesion with elevated margins and an irregular nodular surface. The lesion was resected endoscopically and ultimately diagnosed as a combined neuroendocrine carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma with submucosal invasion. The patient was additionally treated with chemoradiotherapy but died of the primary disease eight months after the initial treatment. It is important to elucidate the natural history of this disease at an early stage.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus with an adenocarcinoma component

A 68-year-old male was referred with dysphagia. Endoscopic findings showed circular stenosis with a protruding mass in the lower esophagus. Biopsy showed adenocarcinoma and there was no evidence of distant metastases. A subtotal esophagectomy was performed. The resected specimen revealed a mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma. The adenocarcinoma component was on the surface of the tumor and the neuroendocrine component invaded the deeper portion. Immunohistochemically, the neuroendocrine carcinoma component stained positive for cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20, suggesting that the neuroendocrine carcinoma originated from the adenocarcinoma. The adenocarcinoma component stained positive for MUC2, which suggests that the adenocarcinoma component originated from Barrett's epithelium. Taken together, the neuroendocrine carcinoma may have originated from Barrett's epithelium. A metastasis to the liver was found 2 months after the surgical resection. Chemotherapy was administered, but there was no response. Most esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas are accompanied by adenocarcinoma or squamous cell components, suggesting that these carcinomas originate from pluripotent cells in squamous or Barrett's epithelium. Appropriate chemotherapy for these lesions should be considered based on the cell of origin.

Genetics and Epigenetics of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous regarding site of origin, biological behavior, and malignant potential. There has been a rapid increase in data publication during the last 10 years, mainly driven by high-throughput studies on pancreatic and small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This review summarizes the present knowledge on genetic and epigenetic alterations. We integrated the available information from each compartment to give a pathway-based overview. This provided a summary of the critical alterations sustaining neoplastic cells. It also highlighted similarities and differences across anatomical locations and points that need further investigation. GEP-NENs include well-differentiated NETs and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). NENs are graded as G1, G2, or G3 based on mitotic count and/or Ki-67 labeling index, NECs are G3 by definition. The distinction between NETs and NECs is also linked to their genetic background, as TP53 and RB1 inactivation in NECs set them apart from NETs. A large number of genetic and epigenetic alterations have been reported. Recurrent changes have been traced back to a reduced number of core pathways, including DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. In pancreatic tumors, chromatin remodeling/histone methylation and telomere alteration are also affected. However, also owing to the paucity of disease models, further research is necessary to fully integrate and functionalize data on deregulated pathways to recapitulate the large heterogeneity of behaviors displayed by these tumors. This is expected to impact diagnostics, prognostic stratification, and planning of personalized therapy.

A rare rarity: Neuroendocrine tumor of the esophagus

Esophageal Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, aggressive and lacking specific symptoms. This causes a diagnostic delay, worsening the prognosis. Numerous cases are reported in literature, without a consensus on the management. Our aim was to clarify epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic, therapeutic management of esophageal NETs. Extensive literature search identified a total of 226 articles. One hundred twenty-five articles (n = 1676) met the inclusion criteria, showing that: the incidence of esophageal NET varies geographically; men (60-70 years) are more affected; smoking and alcohol abuse are the major risk factors; dysphagia, weight loss, appetite loss are the most common clinical features. The histotypes include high-grade small and large cell esophageal carcinomas and low-grade carcinoid tumors. Mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are the most common. Often the diagnosis occurs randomly on endoscopic examination. Circulating markers, functional combined with conventional imaging contributes to the diagnosis and management. Treatment depends on type, grade and stage of the tumor.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison between a Chinese cohort and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data

Background

The optimal standard treatment for primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) remains undetermined. In this study, we conducted two areas of research on SCCE. First, we analyzed differences in SCCE characteristics between Chinese and U.S. patients. Second, we evaluated optimal treatment strategies for SCCE in the Chinese cohort.

Methods

Data from 137 Chinese SCCE patients collected from two cancer centers in China were compared with 385 SCCE patients registered in the U.S. SEER program. Prognostic factors were further analyzed in the Chinese group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline features between the groups.

Results

There were more Chinese SCCE patients with regional stage disease (41.6%) and surgery was the principal local therapy (78.1%), while 51.7% of U.S. patients was at advanced stages and tended to receive radiotherapy as the main therapy (45.2%). Median overall survival (MST) of Chinese patients was 15.0 months, compared with 8.0 months for U.S. patients (P < 0.001). However, the survival differences between groups disappeared after PSM (MST: 12.5 m vs 9.0 m, P = 0.144). Further analysis found that surgery tended to achieve clinical benefits only for patients with localized disease (T1‐4aN0M0). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy may prolong survival in patients with regional and extensive disease.

Conclusions

Although there are huge differences in the tumor characteristics and treatment modalities of SCCE between Chinese and U.S. patients, the prognosis of SCCE is equally poor in both. Surgery should be considered for patients with localized disease, while chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with regional and extensive disease.

Rare Case of Rectal Mixed Adeno-Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer defined as malignant neoplasms in which each component represents at least 30% of the lesion. It was named as Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma and described by the World Health Organization in 2010. Due to its morphological heterogeneity and the rarity of the condition, it becomes quite challenging to formulate an appropriate treatment plan. In this report, we present a case of 67-year-old man found to have a rectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. We discussed the current management strategies and provide a review of the literature.

The Role of Surgery in Treating Resectable Limited Disease of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignant tumor. The role of surgery in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC remains unclear. How to select a specific group of limited disease of esophageal NEC who might benefit from surgery remains to be answered.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC in our department from January 2007 to June 2015 were analyzed. TNM staging system was applied to describe those patients, and according to their different long-term prognosis after surgery, those patients were subgrouped into surgery response limited disease (SRLD) group and surgery non-response limited disease (SNRLD) group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC were identified for analysis. The median survival time of those patients was 21.5 months. There was no significant survival differences among stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients, but all these patients had significantly longer survival than stage III patients. Therefore, stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients were aggregated together as SRLD group, and stage III patients were aggregated as SNRLD group. SRLD patients obtained significantly longer survival than SNRLD patients in both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Moreover, adjuvant therapy could significantly benefit SRLD patients (P = 0.004) but could not benefit SNRLD patients (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSIONS

Different responses to surgery existed in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC indicating the need of further subgrouping for those patients. The resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC could be further subgrouped into SRLD group and SNRLD group according to the TNM staging system.

A neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett's esophagus: a case report and literature review

Background

An esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus is extremely rare. Here, we report a case of an esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett’s esophagus and review the literature.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old man with no symptoms was admitted to our hospital because of the detection of an esophagogastric junction tumor on regular upper endoscopy screening. Endoscopy revealed a sliding hiatal hernia and an approximately 10 mm elevated mass at the esophagogastric junction. Biopsy showed a moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography did not indicate lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. Proximal gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection was performed along with jejunal interposition. On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor was positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Ki-67 was positive in 40% of the tumor cells. The histological diagnosis was a neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett’s esophagus. The postoperative course was good, and the patient was discharged on the twentieth postoperative day. He has remained free of the disease at 36 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

Barrett’s esophagus may be related to the development of a neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Primary Esophageal Mixed Sarcomatoid and Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Brain Metastasis: A Challenging Diagnosis on Biopsy

Mixed carcinomas in the esophagus are highly uncommon neoplasms that represent a diagnostic challenge on small tissue biopsies. We present a case of a primary mixed sarcomatoid–small cell carcinoma of the esophagus that was diagnosed after repeat sampling of the lesion. The components were morphologically distinct and could be further classified by immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing identified mutations in PIK3CA and CDKN2A. The small cell component morphology was also identified in brain metastasis.