Impact of Education and Peer Comparison on Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections

Factors Affecting Prescribing of Type 2 Diabetes Medications in Older Adults within an Integrated Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Despite type 2 diabetes guidelines recommending against the use of sulfonylureas in older adults and for the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP1s) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure (HF), real-world guideline-concordant prescribing remains low. While some factors such as cost have been suggested, an in-depth analysis of the factors associated with guideline-concordant prescribing is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the extent of guideline-concordant prescribing in an integrated health care delivery system and examine provider and patient level factors that influence guideline-concordant prescribing.

DESIGN

We performed a cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were included if they had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, were prescribed a second-line diabetes medication between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 and were at least 65 years old at the time of this second-line prescription.

MAIN MEASURES

Our outcome of interest was guideline-concordant prescribing. The definition of guideline-concordant prescribing was based on American Diabetes Association and American Geriatric Society recommendations as well as expert consensus. Factors affecting guideline concordant prescribing included patient demographics and provider characteristics among others.

KEY RESULTS

We included 1,693 patients of which only 50% were prescribed guideline-concordant medications. In a subgroup of 843 patients with cardiorenal conditions, only 30% of prescriptions were guideline concordant. Prescribing of guideline-concordant prescriptions was more likely among pharmacists than physicians (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51, p<0.001) and in endocrinology practices compared to primary care practices (RR 1.41 95% CI 1.16-1.72, p=0.007). Additionally, guideline concordant prescribing increased over time (42% in 2018 vs 53% in 2019 vs 53% in 2020, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-concordant prescribing remains low in older adults, especially among those with cardiorenal conditions. Future studies should examine barriers to prescribing guideline-concordant medications and interventions to improve guideline-concordant prescribing.

Does poverty increase antibiotic prescribing rates through underlying health conditions? Ecological study using parallel mediation analysis

Objective

Effect of social determinants on antibiotic prescribing rates is poorly studied in modern literature. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of the prevalence of poverty (annual household income <$24,999) in each state on antibiotic prescribing rates in outpatient settings per 1,000 population through chronic health conditions (ie, prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) while also adjusting for confounders (ie, prevalence of population aged ≥65 years and physician density in each state).

Design

Ecological study.

Participants

Entire US population.

Methods

Prevalence estimates from all 51 states were used to calculate direct, indirect, and total effects of poverty on the rates of antibiotic prescribing through parallel mediation analysis using linear regression with chronic health conditions (obesity, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) as mediators. I obtained these data from point-prevalence estimates of 2020 survey results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for rates on poverty, obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and population aged ≥ 65 years. I also used the Antibiotic Resistance & Patient Safety Portal for antibiotic prescribing rates per 1,000 population and the Association of American Medical Colleges database for the physician density per 100,000 population.

Results

For every percentage increase in prevalence of poverty in each state, the antibiotic prescribing rate increased by 17.4 courses per 1,000 population (95% bootstrap confidence interval, 9.2-24.9) using indirect effects of poverty through mediators.

Conclusions

Antibiotic stewardship programs should consider targeting social determinants of health along with underlying health conditions of patients being treated with antibiotics.

Inter-prescriber variability in the decision to prescribe antibiotics to febrile patients attending primary care in Myanmar

Background

Most antibiotic prescribing occurs in primary care. Even within the same health facility, there may be differences between prescribers in their tendency to prescribe antibiotics, which may be masked by summary data. We aimed to quantify prescriber variability in antibiotic prescription to patients with acute fever in primary care clinics in Myanmar.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of prescribing data from 1090 patient consultations with 40 prescribing doctors from a trial investigating the effect of point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) tests on antibiotic prescription for acute fever. We used multilevel logistic regression models to assess inter-prescriber variability in the decision to prescribe antibiotics.

Results

The median odds ratio (MOR) in the unadjusted model was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.47–2.56) indicating that when two prescribers from this population are randomly selected then in half of these pairs the odds of prescription will be greater than 1.82-fold higher in one prescriber than the other. The estimated variability from this sample of prescribers corresponds to a population of prescribers where the top 25% of prescribers will prescribe antibiotics to over 41% of patients while the bottom 25% will prescribe antibiotics to less than 23% of patients. Inter-prescriber variation in antibiotic prescribing remained after adjustment for patient characteristics and CRP information (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite sharing the same management guidelines, there was substantial inter-prescriber variation in antibiotic prescription to patients with acute fever. This variation should be considered when designing trials and stewardship programmes aiming to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback

Objective:

To assess the effect of individual compared to clinic-level feedback on guideline-concordant care for 3 acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) among family medicine clinicians caring for pediatric patients.

Design:

Cluster randomized controlled trial with a 22-month baseline, 26-month intervention period, and 12-month postintervention period.

Setting and participants:

In total, 26 family medicine practices (39 clinics) caring for pediatric patients in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina were selected based upon performance on guideline-concordance for 3 ARTIs, stratified by practice size. These were randomly allocated to a control group (17 clinics in 13 practices) or to an intervention group (22 clinics in 13 practices).

Interventions:

All clinicians received an education session and baseline then monthly clinic-level rates for guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS), and acute otitis media (AOM). For the intervention group only, individual clinician performance was provided.

Results:

Both intervention and control groups demonstrated improvement from baseline, but the intervention group had significantly greater improvement compared with the control group: URI (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.92; P < 0.01); ABS (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11–1.88; P < 0.01); and AOM (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.24–2.03; P < 0.01). The intervention group also showed significantly greater reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing percentage (BSAP%): odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.01. During the postintervention year, gains were maintained in the intervention group for each ARTI and for URI and AOM in the control group.

Conclusions:

Monthly individual peer feedback is superior to clinic-level only feedback in family medicine clinics for 3 pediatric ARTIs and for BSAP% reduction.

Trial registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04588376, Improving Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Infection by Family Physicians with Peer Comparison.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting: A review and proposed framework

Antimicrobial misuse is still a significant problem, and most inappropriate use occurs in the outpatient setting. In this article, we provide a review of available literature on outpatient antimicrobial stewardship in primary care settings, and we propose a novel implementation framework.