Comparison of Treatment Outcomes after Collagenase Injection and Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy for Dupuytren's Contracture: Objective and Subjective Comparisons with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Sex Difference in the Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the sex differences in enrollment into clinical trials for Dupuytren's disease (DD), treatment efficacy, and complications. Methods: Three databases were searched; Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL. Included studies were clinical trials on adult patients with DD. Exclusion criteria were non-English studies and other study designs. Two independent reviewers completed abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. The number and percentage of studies that reported ad hoc analyses for sex differences in treatment efficacy, tolerability, and complications were reported. A meta-analysis was performed on the proportion of female participants enrolled in clinical trials for DD. Results: A total of 3172 references were screened, and 59 studies were identified for full-text review. We identified 28 clinical trials for DD of which none reported secondary analyses for sex differences. Only 2 trials discussed sex differences in complications, and one trial reported sex differences in tolerability. The proportion of female participants in the meta-analysis was 19.5% [95% CI: 16.1-23.0%]. Conclusion: Sex differences in the clinical trials for DD are not widely considered in clinical trials despite their critical role. Males and females do not have equal representation in clinical trials for DD. Future studies should account for sex differences in the design and the analysis of clinical trials.

Industry Sponsorship Bias in Collagenase Clinical Trials for Dupuytren Disease: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (collagenase) was introduced in 2010 creating a nonoperative treatment option for Dupuytren disease with promising results in sponsored clinical trials. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate industry sponsorship bias.

METHODS

A systematic review of collagenase treatment of Dupuytren contracture was conducted. Articles containing mesh terms including "microbial collagenase" and "Dupuytren's contracture" were searched and limited to only clinical trials with similar protocols for inclusion. Meta-analysis of treatment endpoints of correction of contracture to 0-5 degrees after first and last injection was conducted comparing sponsored versus nonsponsored studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen of the 29 identified articles met criteria for inclusion. Nonsponsored studies reported a significantly higher rate of meeting the primary treatment endpoint compared to sponsored studies after single injection for all joints (69.6% vs 56% P < 0.01), metacarpophalangeal joint (96% vs 64% P < 0.01), and proximal interphalangeal joint (67% vs 36% P = 0.011). The correction in contracture rates was similar between groups with studies evaluating more than one injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsponsored studies published higher success rates in meeting the primary endpoint of full correction after single injection than sponsored studies; however, similar results with multiple injections. This study demonstrated that sponsored studies of collagenase produced highly powered studies that may be reliably depended on for evidence-based clinical application.

Surgery, Needle Fasciotomy, or Collagenase Injection for Dupuytren Contracture : A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgery, needle fasciotomy, and collagenase injection are used to treat Dupuytren contracture. The treatment decision requires balancing initial morbidity and costs of surgery against its potential long-term benefits over needle fasciotomy and collagenase.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of surgery, needle fasciotomy, and collagenase injection at 3 months and 2 years (secondary time points of the trial).

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, outcome assessor-blinded, superiority trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03192020).

SETTING

6 public hospitals in Finland.

PARTICIPANTS

302 persons with treatment-naive Dupuytren contracture (contracture angle <135°).

INTERVENTION

Surgery (n = 101), needle fasciotomy (n = 101), or collagenase (n = 100).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the success rate, defined as greater than 50% contracture release and patients reaching the patient acceptable symptom state. Secondary outcomes included hand function, pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction, residual contracture angle, finger flexion, risk for retreatment, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 292 (97%) and 284 (94%) participants completed the 3-month and 2-year follow-ups. Success rates were similar at 3 months: 71% (95% CI, 62% to 80%) for surgery, 73% (CI, 64% to 82%) for needle fasciotomy, and 73% (CI, 64% to 82%) for collagenase. At 2 years, surgery had superior success rates compared with both needle fasciotomy (78% vs. 50%; adjusted risk difference [aRD], 0.30 [CI, 0.17 to 0.43]) and collagenase (78% vs. 65%; aRD, 0.13 [CI, 0.01 to 0.26]). Secondary analyses paralleled with the primary analysis.

LIMITATION

Participants were not blinded.

CONCLUSION

Initial outcomes are similar between the treatments, but at 2 years success rates were maintained in the surgery group but were lower with both needle fasciotomy and collagenase despite retreatments.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Research Council of Finland.

Comparing Complications and Patient Satisfaction Following Injectable Collagenase Versus Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a fibroproliferative disorder that manifests as an abnormal growth of myofibroblasts, causing nodule formation and contractures and affecting digit function. If left untreated, these contractures can lead to a loss of mobility and potentially impact hand function. This systematic review critically compares and evaluates the existing literature on the complications and patient satisfaction following injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) versus limited fasciectomy (LF) for DD. We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) databases from 2006 to August 2023. This research targeted all clinical studies involving adults who underwent injectable collagenase and/or limited fasciectomy in the management of DD. Out of the 437 identified studies, only 53 were considered eligible for our analysis, and merely 14 met our inclusion criteria. These selected studies encompassed a total of 967 patients with 1,344 treated joints, with an average follow-up duration of 19.22 (ranging from one to 84.06) months. Within this cohort, 498 joints from 385 patients underwent LF, while 846 joints from 491 patients received CCH injections. Notably, among the 491 patients treated with CCH, 1,060 complications were reported, averaging 2.15 complications per patient, with the most common being contusion/bruising/hematoma/ecchymosis (22.54%), and edema/swelling (18.96%). In contrast, among the 385 patients treated with LF, only 97 complications were reported, translating to 0.25 complications per patient, with the most frequent being paraesthesia or numbness (23.7%), scar sequelae like skin laceration, tear, fissure, or hypertrophic scar (23.7%), and neuropraxia or nerve injury (22.6%). Our meta-analysis indicates that paraesthesia or numbness is more frequently observed in LF than CCH injections, although without statistical significance, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.39 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-1.18, p-value 0.1). However, scar sequelae (hypertrophic scar, skin laceration, tear, or fissure) show a contrasting pattern, being more commonly associated with CCH injections than LF, with an RR of 1.98 (95% CI 0.26-14.85, p-value 0.51), which, upon eliminating the source of heterogeneity, becomes statistically significant, with an RR of 4.98 (95% CI 1.40-17.72, p-value 0.01). Our data revealed a higher frequency of complications with CCH compared to LF, although more severe adverse effects were observed in the LF group, such as neuropraxia or nerve injury. Scar sequelae were more common with CCH injections. Despite both treatments showing increased patient satisfaction at the final follow-up, CCH injection resulted in earlier improvements in satisfaction.

Collagenase Treatment Versus Needle Fasciotomy for Single-Digit Dupuytren Contractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the available randomized controlled trial data comparing needle fasciotomy and collagenase treatment for single-digit Dupuytren contractures with a minimum of 3-year follow-up and determine whether one treatment is superior regarding contracture correction and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching four databases for randomized controlled trials investigating the single-digit treatment outcomes for Dupuytren contracture comparing collagenase treatment and needle fasciotomy with a minimum of 3-year follow-up. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model in anticipation of unobserved heterogeneity. The primary outcome measure was contracture recurrence. Secondary outcome measures included final fixed flexion contracture (FFC), Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, and Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scores.

RESULTS

After screening 264 articles, 4 randomized clinical trials were eligible for final inclusion. One trial had a high risk of bias, and two trials had some concern for bias. The final meta-analysis included 347 patients, 169 who underwent collagenase treatment and 178 who underwent needle fasciotomy. No significant differences were noted between the groups in contracture recurrence, FFC, and URAM scores. The pooled data showed a higher QuickDASH score in the collagenase treatment group compared with the needle fasciotomy group, but the observed difference was less than what would be expected to be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

Needle fasciotomy and collagenase treatment have similar outcomes with regards to contracture recurrence, final FFC, QuickDASH scores, and URAM scores for the single-digit treatment for Dupuytren contracture at a minimum of 3-year follow-up. Relevant factors that may be considered during the shared decision-making process for treatment selection include surgeon and patient preferences, costs of treatment, and the disparate complication profiles of these two treatments.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Comparison of Patient Demographics, Utilization Trends, and Costs of Treatment for Dupuytren's Disease in the United States From 2012 to 2019

INTRODUCTION

Dupuytren's disease is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palm leading to flexion deformities of the digits that impair hand function. Studies have evaluated treatment trends for patients with Dupuytren's disease; however, most conclude in 2012 shortly after collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection was introduced to the market. It is unknown how provider preferences have been influenced since its introduction. We aimed to compare treatment options with regard to (1) patient demographics, (2) annual utilization rates, and (3) costs.

METHODS

The PearlDiver nationwide administrative claims database from 2012 to 2019 was analyzed for patients diagnosed with Dupuytren's disease (N = 47,813). Patients receiving procedural treatment were identified using codes for percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) (current procedural terminology [CPT] 26040), open fasciotomy (CPT 26045), open fasciectomy (CPT 26121, 26123, 26125), and CCH injection (CPT 20527). Fasciectomies were further analyzed by examining the number of patients receiving release of 1 or more digits (CPT 26123, 26125) versus palmar-only surgery (CPT 26121). Outcomes included comparing patient comorbidities comprising the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), frequencies of each procedure annually, and costs. Linear regressions evaluated changes in utilization over time. Analysis of variance compared costs. P values less than 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

Patient demographics for each treatment differed with respect to age, sex, and the presence of multiple comorbidities comprising the ECI. Open fasciectomy (60.7%) was the predominant treatment, followed by CCH injection (22.9%), PNA (10.1%), and open fasciotomy (6.3%) ( P < 0.001). Multiple patient comorbidities comprising the ECI differed for each treatment. Relative to total annual procedures from 2012 to 2019, PNA declined (10.2% to 9.5%, P = 0.037), open fasciotomy declined (6.8% to 5.6%, P = 0.007), palmar fasciectomy remained constant (14.5% to 14.2%, P = 0.710), fasciectomy of digits increased (46.3% to 47.5%, P = 0.030), and CCH injection remained constant (22.2% to 23.3%, P = 0.623). Day of procedure costs were significantly different for PNA ($573), open fasciotomy ($1176), palmar open fasciectomy ($1410), open fasciectomy digits ($1560), and CCH injection ($1250) ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall annual Dupuytren's disease treatment did not change over time. Treatment with open fasciectomy continues to be preferred. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum utilization has remained constant since its introduction. This study may assist hand surgeons in educating patients on the treatment and costs related to Dupuytren's disease.

Patient-Reported Outcome in Dupuytren's Disease Treated With Fasciectomy, Collagenase or Needle Fasciotomy: A Swedish Registry Study

Purpose

This registry study compares the patient-reported outcomes of 3 treatments for Dupuytren´s disease: open fasciectomy (OF), collagenase injection (CCH) and percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF).

Methods

From the Swedish national quality registry for hand surgery (HAKIR) we included 2,585 procedures (in 2,414 patients): 1,200 treatments were OF, 918 CCH, and 467 PNF. The choice between CCH and PNF varied mainly because of regional differences in reimbursement of CCH. We report the results of the validated patient-reported outcome instrument HQ-8. HQ-8 evaluates symptoms in the treated hand and is issued before treatment, 3 and 12 months after treatment and is used for all patients in HAKIR.

Results

At 3-month follow-up, patients treated with CCH or PNF experienced less stiffness, weakness, numbness, tingling and sensitivity to cold. At 12 months, the differences among the 3 treatments were smaller, but CCH patients experienced less stiffness and weakness compared to PNF-treated patients.

Conclusions

Most randomized controlled trials have not shown significant differences in recurrence rates or patient-reported outcomes between CCH and PNF, but the number of patients has been limited and no randomized controlled trials have included all 3 treatments. In the present study, we compared registry data on patient-reported outcomes for OF, CCH, and PNF in a real-life clinical setting. Our results confirm that the noninvasive treatments (CCH and PNF) cause less disability than OF and indicate a possible advantage of CCH compared to PNF regarding stiffness and weakness at 1 year after treatment based on patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported residual symptoms are important to consider when informing patients and selecting treatment for Dupuytren´s disease.

Type of study/level of evidence

Observational registry study III.

Risk Factors for Long-Term Contracture Recurrence after Collagenase Injection for Dupuytren Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

In Dupuytren disease, little is known about the long-term outcomes of collagenase injection or risk factors for contracture recurrence. In this prospective study, 159 patients (242 fingers) with Dupuytren disease and active extension deficit (AED) ≥20° in a metacarpophalangeal (MCP) or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint were treated with collagenase injection during a 14-month period. At 5 years, 18 patients were deceased, 2 could not be contacted, and 13 had undergone fasciectomy. The remaining 126 patients (199 treated fingers) participated in a follow-up evaluation at 52–96 (mean 65) months after injection, with physical examination (114 patients) or telephone interview (12 patients). Recurrence was defined as subsequent treatment (surgery or repeat injection) or ≥20° AED worsening in a treated joint between the 6-week and 5-year measurements. The mean AED at baseline was 42° (SD 24) for MCP joints and 31° (SD 29) for PIP joints and at 5 years 11° (SD 17) and 17° (SD 23), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 17% of MCP joints and 25% of PIP joints. Statistically significant risk factors for PIP joint contracture recurrence were greater baseline AED (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06) and small finger treatment (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.5–14.3), with no significant risk factors found for MCP contracture recurrence.

Three-Year Recurrence of Dupuytren Contracture after Needle Fasciotomy or Collagenase Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In this randomized controlled trial, the authors compared the recurrence of Dupuytren disease at 3 years following needle fasciotomy or collagenase injection treatment for isolated metacarpophalangeal joint contractures.

METHODS

The study was conducted between 2013 and 2015. The study design was a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial with an independent blinded observer. Patients were randomized between collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections (Xiapex) and percutaneous needle fasciotomy (collagenase clostridium histolyticum versus percutaneous needle fasciotomy). A total of 36 patients were followed in the percutaneous needle fasciotomy group and 32 in the collagenase clostridium histolyticum group.

RESULTS

Patients who were treated with collagenase clostridium histolyticum had a significantly lower recurrence rate than patients treated with percutaneous needle fasciotomy during the 3-year period ( P = 0.007). Of the 36 patients who were followed in the percutaneous needle fasciotomy group, 17 (47%) had recurrence of extension deficit or progression of the disease leading to further treatment. Of the 32 patients who were followed in the collagenase clostridium histolyticum group, six (19%) had recurrence or progression. No serious adverse event was reported in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized controlled trial, we found less recurrence and progression of Dupuytren disease using collagenase injection as compared to percutaneous needle fasciotomy 3 years following treatment for isolated metacarpophalangeal joint contractures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline on Dupuytren Disease

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive, evidence-based overview of the treatment for Dupuytren disease, specifically needle techniques, radiotherapy, primary conservative therapy, surgery, lipofilling, operative arthrolysis, salvage techniques, and the postoperative protocol and to make clinical recommendations for health care practitioners and patients.

Methods

Comprehensive multidisciplinary guideline process funded by the Quality Foundation of the Dutch Federation of Medical Specialists. This process included a development, commentary, and authorization phase. Patients participated in every phase. Multiple databases and existing guidelines up to August 2020 were searched. Studies on Dupuytren disease were considered eligible. Specific eligibility criteria were described per module. To appraise the certainty of the evidence, reviewers extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method, where applicable. Important considerations were as follows: patient values and preferences, costs, acceptability of other stakeholders, and feasibility of implementation. Recommendations were made based on the evidence from the literature and the considerations. The primary and secondary outcome measures were defined per module based on the input of patients obtained in collaboration with the Netherlands Patient Federation and health care providers from different professions.

Results

The following 8 specific modules were completed for Dupuytren disease: (1) needle techniques, (2) radiotherapy, (3) primary conservative therapy, (4) surgery, (5) lipofilling, (6) operative arthrolysis, (7) salvage techniques, and (8) the postoperative protocol.

Conclusions

Our Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on Dupuytren disease provides 8 modules developed according to the standards of the Dutch Federation of Medical Specialists. Evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice are provided for needle techniques, radiotherapy, primary conservative therapy, surgery, lipofilling, operative arthrolysis, salvage techniques, and the postoperative protocol. This guideline can assist health care providers and patients in clinical practice.

Type of study/level of evidence

Systematic review/I-II.

Short-term efficacy and adverse effects of collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections, percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aims

Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a chronic debilitating fibroproliferative disorder.

Common treatment options include collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections (CI), percutaneous needle fasciotomy (NF) and limited fasciectomy (LF). Superiority of one specific treatment remains controversial. This study aims to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of CI, NF, and LF for the treatment of DC.

Methods

We included randomized controlled trials of CI compared with placebo, NF and LF for patients with DC. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 2021. Contracture reduction rates in treated joints (within 0–5° of full extension within 30 days), relative reduction in total passive extension deficit (TPED), occurrence of one or more adverse events and number of treatment-related adverse events per patient were the outcomes of interest. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was employed for quality assessment of the studies. A network meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL.

Results

Nine studies met our inclusion criteria (n = 903). Overall, risk bias was mixed and mostly low. Short term TPED reduction achieved with LF was superior compared to CI and NF. Although CI achieved greater TPED reduction compared to NF, it was associated with the highest risk of overall adverse effects. The analyzed data was limited to a maximum three-year follow-up period and therefore insufficient for long-term outcome evaluation.

Conclusions

In DC, LF may be able to provide patients with severe disease, superior flexion contracture release postoperatively. CI is a valid treatment alternative to NF, however the higher risk of overall adverse effects must be considered. The quality-of-evidence is limited due to short-term follow-up periods and a lack of standardized definitions of complications and adverse events.

Dupuytren's disease: using needles more across the world

In this article we take an international perspective on the use of needles, either percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) or Clostridial Collagenase Histiolyticum (CCH), in treating Dupuytren's Disease (DD). Worldwide, PNF is now used more frequently. The CCH has been withdrawn from non-USA markets, which lessens its use. Different patients have different preferences, while different surgeons have different skills and opinions. The surgeon should fully consider the patient's preference and should also, in view of the scarcity of surgical resource and the potential hazard of surgery, reconsider and expand the use of a needle rather than an operation. In the future, a cheaper, yet equally safe and effective alternative to CCH, will provide a useful clinical tool for those cords, which, in the surgeon's personal Venn diagram, are too challenging for PNF, but the patient does not want to have surgery.

Report on the Evidence-Based Practice Committee’s Survey on Dupuytren Disease

Purpose

The Evidence-Based Practice Committee of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) set out to assess the membership’s practice patterns (PPs) and knowledge of evidence-based principles for Dupuytren disease (DD).

Methods

A 21-item multiple-choice survey was distributed to all ASSH members via email in June 2020. Questions were divided into 2 types: evidence-based practice (EBP) and PPs. The survey addressed the following subtopics: nonsurgical, percutaneous, and open surgical management of DD.

Results

The response rate was 18% (n = 419). Of 13 EBP questions, 5 were answered with the preferred response by >75% of surgeons. The remaining 8 EBP questions had greater frequencies of less preferred responses, which concerned the current evidence for percutaneous management, as well as nonsurgical and postoperative management of DD. Of the PP questions, there were differences in opinion on how to manage a painful nodule, the percutaneous technique (eg, collagenase injection vs percutaneous needle aponeurotomy), and the choice of surgical incision for open fasciectomy (eg, Bruner incision with Z-plasties, partial closure with an open transverse palmar component, or longitudinal incision with Z-plasties).

Conclusions

Hand surgeons continue to be well informed about current evidence-based practices for treating DD and can improve their knowledge by familiarizing themselves with current data on percutaneous and nonsurgical methods. There exist differences in PPs for DD in the ASSH membership, specifically with less invasive management; and knowledge of peer practices can help navigate differences, critically interpret the evidence, and optimize patient care.

Type of study/level of evidence

Economic/Decision Analyses V.

Dupuytren Contractures: An Update of Recent Literature

Dupuytren disease is a fibroproliferative disorder that affects the palmar fascia of the hand and results in varying degrees of nodule and cord formation. Over time, patients may develop progressive contractures, impairing their ability to type, to perform with fine instruments, or to participate in social activities such as shaking hands. Treatment options for Dupuytren contractures include needle aponeurotomy (NA), injection of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) with manipulation of the digits, and surgical fasciectomy. Over the past decade, the use of CCH has increased. Recent studies have provided additional data regarding the pathophysiology, indications, outcomes, and costs associated with the treatment for Dupuytren contractures, and this review highlights these advances.