Multidetector Row Computed Tomographic Gastrography Findings After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: Emphasis on Time Evolution and Factors for Predicting Residual Tumor

Temporal evolution of multidetector CT findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer: correlation with endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes over time in imaging findings retrospectively by multidetector CT (MDCT) with two-dimensional (2D) multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional (3D) CT gastrography (CTG), after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), and to correlate 3D CT images with endoscopic appearance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 84 patients underwent ESD and were followed up with MDCT. Fifteen patients underwent CT twice, and 3 patients underwent CT 3 times. A total of 105 CTs were included in this study and 43 CTs contained 3D CTGs. Two radiologists in consensus interpreted CT images for lesion detectability, presence and characteristics of ulcer, focal wall thickening, perigastric fat infiltration, and overlying enhancing layer in 2D images. The presence of ulcer or subtle mucosal nodularity, ulcer mound, and fold convergence were analysed in 3D CT images. We also assessed the time interval between ESD and CT and analysed the temporal evolution of CT findings. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 3D CTG were assessed regarding endoscopic features as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean interval between ESD and follow up CT was 76.9 days (median, 62; range, 2-223). No tumour recurrence in any lesion was found on follow-up endoscopic biopsy and also lymph node or distant metastasis was not observed on CT exams in the follow-up period. The lesion detectability in a total of 105 post-ESD 2D CT images was 42.0% (44/105), and 93.2% (41/44) of the detected lesions were visualizable 2 months after ESD. Focal wall thickening was observed during the entire follow-up period in all patients. Perigastric fat infiltration was observed in 4 lesions within 1 week of ESD. Overlying enhancing layer appeared in 27 lesions without temporal evolution. On a total of 43 post-ESD 3D CTG, lesion detectability was 76.7% (33/43), and lesions could be visualized for a longer period than by 2D CT images (223 days versus 99 days). Three-dimensional imaging features revealed ulcer, ulcer mound, and fold convergence. Ulcer mounds disappeared first (median, 12.5 days; range, 2-14 days after ESD), ulcers appeared up to 4 months after ESD (median, 14 days; range, 2-174 days after ESD) and fold convergence continued to the end of the study (median, 74 days; range, 2-223 days after ESD). We found that sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 3D CTG were 70.0%, 92.9%, 83.3% for ulcer, 28.6%, 100%, 71.4% for ulcer mound, and 71.4%, 100%, 75% for fold convergence regarding endoscopy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On follow-up 2D or 3D CT images after ESD, early findings were of perigastric fat infiltration, ulcer, and surrounding oedema. Focal wall thickening and fold convergence continued to be observed late in the study. The overlying enhancing layer did not show temporal evolution.

Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multidetector CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: differentiation of mucosal cancer (T1a) from submucosal involvement (T1b and T2)

PURPOSE

To identify the computed tomographic (CT) findings in T1a and T1b cancers and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT with two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional CT gastrography for evaluating the preoperative staging of gastric cancer, with special emphasis on the differentiation between T1a and T1b cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 148 patients with gastric cancer (64 T1a, 36 T1b, and 48 T2) were included. To identify CT findings in T1a and T1b cancers, two radiologists in consensus interpreted the preoperative CT images of the 100 T1 cancers to determine the morphologic characteristics to be used as staging criteria on CT images. By using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses, the diagnostic criteria to identify T1a and T1b cancers were developed. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT by using the criteria, two other blinded reviewers independently analyzed the CT images of all 148 patients to assess the T (classifying the depth of invasion as T1a, T1b, or T2) and N (classifying nodal involvement as absent or present) stage. CT staging was correlated with histopathologic results. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The detectability of T1b cancer was significantly higher than that of T1a cancer (P = .003). T1b cancer showed well-enhancing mucosal thickening more frequently than did T1a cancer (P = .002). By using the modified CT criteria, the overall accuracy values of T staging and N staging were 64.9% (96/148) and 79.1% (117/148) for reviewer 1 and 63.5% (94/148) and 83.8% (124/148) for reviewer 2, respectively. Weighted kappa values of T and N staging were 0.795 and 0.641, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On multidetector CT images, T1a cancer shows different imaging features than does T1b cancer regarding enhancing characteristics and detectability. Multidetector CT provides relatively valuable results of T and N staging, including differentiation between T1a, T1b, and T2 gastric cancers.

Radiologist performance in differentiating polypoid early from advanced gastric cancer using specific CT criteria: emphasis on dimpling sign

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively determine whether there are specific CT features that can be used to differentiate polypoid early from advanced gastric cancer and to assess the performance of radiologists using specific CT findings for differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of medical records yielded the cases of 46 patients, 27 with polypoid early gastric cancer and 19 with polypoid advanced gastric cancer, whose CT scans were available for review. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the CT images for the presence and depth of dimpling at the tumor base, the presence of vessel invagination at the dimpling site, thickening of the low-attenuating outer layer, perigastric infiltration, and transmural full-thickness enhancement of the lesion. Individual CT findings relevant as predictors were determined with univariate and multivariate analyses. Individual review of CT scans subsequently was performed by two other radiologists, who were blinded to tumor stage but aware of the results of univariate and multivariate analyses. Individual performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The presence of severe dimpling greater than 3.5 mm at the base of the tumor (odds ratio, 31.3) had the highest odds ratio for differentiating early from advanced gastric cancer, followed by vessel invagination (odds ratio, 12.3), the presence of dimpling (odds ratio, 9.8), perigastric infiltration (odds ratio, 5.2), and transmural full-thickness enhancement (odds ratio, 4.8). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of dimpling greater than 3.5 mm was the only independent variable that differentiated polypoid advanced gastric cancer from polypoid early gastric cancer (p = 0.001). Subsequent differentiation of advanced from early gastric cancer with the described CT findings was very good, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic analysis curves of 0.827 and 0.811 for the two observers.

CONCLUSION

Greater than 3.5 mm dimpling and other ancillary CT findings are helpful in differentiating polypoid advanced gastric cancer from polypoid early gastric cancer and contribute to good individual accuracy for differentiation.