Digital Pulp Ulcerations and Inverse Gottron Papules in Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Related Dermatomyositis

Collagen Vascular Diseases: A Review of Cutaneous and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Dermatomyositis, and Distinguishing Features in Skin of Color

Collagen vascular diseases such as lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis (DM) occur 2 to 3 times more often among patients with skin of color. In this article, the authors review DM and cutaneous lupus erythematosus, including acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and discoid lupus erythematosus. They discuss the distinguishing features between these entities and highlight distinct presentations and management considerations in patients with skin of color to aid in prompt and correct diagnoses in this patient population.

Update on Cutaneous Signs to Assist in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a heterogeneous idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that can be challenging to diagnose. Learning about the cutaneous manifestations in DM can assist with prompt diagnosis as well as subgroup classification. This review highlights recent data regarding cutaneous signs in DM and their associations with myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Several novel DM skin signs have recently been reported. Novel and confirmatory data have helped to define more clearly the associations between various cutaneous manifestations and MSAs. Awareness of the diverse cutaneous phenotypes can help with the timely diagnosis of DM. As some MSAs are associated with atypical skin features and/or characteristic patterns of clinical findings, knowledge of these associations can help clinicians to recognize DM patients. Understanding how the prevalence and presentation of various cutaneous signs differ among ethnically diverse patients is a high priority for further study.

Bench to bedside review of myositis autoantibodies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies represent a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with systemic involvement. Even though numerous specific autoantibodies have been recognized, they have not been included, with the only exception of anti-Jo-1, into the 2017 Classification Criteria, thus perpetuating a clinical-serologic gap. The lack of homogeneous grouping based on the antibody profile deeply impacts the diagnostic approach, therapeutic choices and prognostic stratification of these patients. This review is intended to highlight the comprehensive scenario regarding myositis-related autoantibodies, from the molecular characterization and biological significance to target antigens, from the detection tools, with a special focus on immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells, to their relative prevalence and ethnic diversity, from the clinical presentation to prognosis. If, on the one hand, a notable body of literature is present, on the other data are fragmented, retrospectively based and collected from small case series, so that they do not sufficiently support the decision-making process (i.e. therapeutic approach) into the clinics.