Optimizing Radiotherapy for Keloids: A Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Comparing Recurrence Rates Between Different Radiation Modalities

Effectiveness of postoperative superficial radiotherapy following the keloid-cross-flap surgery for auricular keloid: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Retaining partial keloid skin to make cross flaps (keloid-cross-flap surgery) is a modification of the core excision. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of superficial radiotherapy versus compression therapy after keloid-cross-flap surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, auricular keloid patients were consecutively screened from January 2019 to December 2021. They underwent keloid-cross-flap surgery and then enter either the superficial radiotherapy or the compression treatment group. The primary outcome was the one-year keloid recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included: non-completion rate of adjuvant treatment; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores and auricular aesthetics scores, evaluated by a four-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) of non-recurring patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

123 patients were included in the superficial radiotherapy group and 128 in the compression treatment group. Non-completion rate was significantly higher in the compression treatment group (17.97 %), while the loss rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (13.54 %) relapsed in superficial radiotherapy group, while 22 patients (25.58 %) in compression group (p < 0.05). After PSM, 59 patients in each group were analyzed, and the recurrence rate was lower in the superficial radiotherapy group (13.56 %). Of relapse-free patients, no significant difference was found in PSAS scores, OSAS scores or aesthetic scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Keloid-cross-flap surgery could provide favorable morphologic repair of the auricular keloid, and postoperative superficial radiotherapy shows higher compliance and lower recurrence rate comparing to compression treatment.

Comprehensive Insights into Keloid Pathogenesis and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies

Keloid scars, characterized by abnormal fibroproliferation and excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) production that extends beyond the original wound, often cause pruritus, pain, and hyperpigmentation, significantly impacting the quality of life. Keloid pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, immune response dysregulation, and aberrant wound-healing processes. Central molecular pathways such as TGF-β/Smad and JAK/STAT are important in keloid formation by sustaining fibroblast activation and ECM deposition. Conventional treatments, including surgical excision, radiation, laser therapies, and intralesional injections, yield variable success but are limited by high recurrence rates and potential adverse effects. Emerging therapies targeting specific immune pathways, small molecule inhibitors, RNA interference, and mesenchymal stem cells show promise in disrupting the underlying mechanisms of keloid pathogenesis, potentially offering more effective and lasting treatment outcomes. Despite advancements, further research is essential to fully elucidate the precise mechanisms of keloid formation and to develop targeted therapies. Ongoing clinical trials and research efforts are vital for translating these scientific insights into practical treatments that can markedly enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by keloid scars.

Smart Use of Skin Biopsy Punch in Treating Keloids: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of scarring has long been a problem due to high incidence and recurrence. Despite many existing treatment therapies, the efficacy remains unstable.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of skin biopsy punch in combination with corticosteroid injection (BPCI) in treating keloids.

APPROACH

This was a retrospective study. In total, 16 patients with keloids received BPCI. Changes in scar appearance, accompanied symptoms, and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) were analyzed. Patient satisfaction, VAS scores, and adverse effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Scar appearance, accompanied symptoms, and VSS scores improved significantly after the treatment. The total effective rate was 93.75% at an 18-month follow-up on average. The mean reduction rate of VSS score was 58.44% (p < 0.0001), especially in height and pliability (84.44% and 78.19%, p < 0.0001). The recurrence rate in this study was 12.5% (n = 2) at an 18-month follow-up on average. Mild adverse effects of pain, pruritus, hypopigmentation, and telangiectasia were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated BPCI might be an effective and safe therapy in keloids with a low long-time recurrence rate and well tolerance for patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment outcomes of surgery followed by short-course every other day radiotherapy in keloid

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy can significantly reduce keloid recurrence. However, consensus on the optimal radiotherapy dose and treatment schedule remains elusive. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery followed by a short-course of radiotherapy administered every other day for keloid treatment.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 498 patients with keloids treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients underwent electron beam irradiation at a dose of 16 Gy, delivered in four fractions every other day, starting within 24 h post-surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the local control rate.

RESULTS

A total of 130 (26.5%) keloids recurred after a median follow-up of 68.1months (42.6-129.9 months). The local control rates at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years for all patients were 89.5%, 82.5% and 81%, respectively. The highest recurrence rate was observed in keloids located in the chest region (50.8%), followed by the suprapubic (47.8%), head and neck (38.8%), limbs (33.3%) and ear (14%). Both multivariate and univariate analyses identified the presence of pain and or pruritus as an independently prognostic factor for keloid recurrence (p<0.0001). The local control rates at 1-year, 3-years and 5-years for patients with or without symptom of pain or pruritus were 45% vs. 98.8%, 12.5% vs. 95.9%, and 8.8% vs. 95%, respectively (HR:37.829, 95%CI: 24.385-58.686, p<0.001). In the ear keloid subgroup, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year local control rates for patients with pruritus were significantly lower than those without pain or pruritus (60.0% vs. 97.9%, 26.7% vs. 94.7%, 26.7% vs. 94.3%, HR:30.209, 95% CI:14.793-61.69, p<0.001). The same results were found in other location(p<0.001). During treatment and follow-up, two patients experienced infections, and one patient developed a cutaneous fibroblastoma.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a combination of surgery followed by short-course, every-other-day radiotherapy can yield satisfactory local control rates for keloids. Pain and or pruritus symptom was an independently prognostic factors for recurrence of keloid. To further validate these results, a prospective randomized controlled trial is recommended.

Post-Excision Soft X-Ray Radiotherapy for Keloids: Experience in a Tertiary Referral Center

INTRODUCTION

Keloid is an abnormal proliferation of scar tissue that grows beyond the original margins of the injury. Even after complete resection, recurrences are common and pose a poorly understood challenge in dermatology. There is lack of large prospective clinical trials; thus, treatment recommendations are based on retrospective analyses and small cohort studies. Superficial radiotherapy is recommended in recurrent keloids; however, the successful treatment rates vary greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the keloid recurrence rate after post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy and the associated factors.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospective data of all patients, treated with adjuvant post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy with 12 Gy in 6 sessions at the tertiary referral center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2005 and 2018. We analyzed individual keloids as separate cases. Successful treatment was defined as no sign of recurrence within 2 years.

RESULTS

Of the 200 identified patients, 90 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. In 90 patients, 104 cases of treated keloids were analyzed. Keloids were mainly located on the trunk (49%) and were mostly caused by previous surgery (52.2%). 50% of the keloids did not relapse within 2 years after therapy. A significant factor leading to recurrence was the presence of previous therapy, with prior topical therapies, such as steroid injections or 5-fluorouracil, leading to most relapses. 69.2% of keloid cases who relapsed were pretreated. Soft X-ray radiotherapy was well tolerated, with posttreatment hyperpigmentation noted in 34% of patients, particularly in patients with non-Caucasian origin (61.3%).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of refractory keloids is difficult. Post-excision radiotherapy is an established adjuvant treatment option; nevertheless, recurrence rates are high, especially in pretreated keloids. Prospective studies determining the exact dosage and fraction of post-excisional radiotherapy are needed to determine the optimal radiation parameters.

A Single-Institution Review of the Use of Radiation in the Adjuvant and Definitive Management of Keloids

AIMS

Many individuals suffer from keloids that are refractory to standard treatment modalities, including surgical excision alone. Radiation therapy can be used to reduce the risk of recurrent keloids post-operatively, as well as be used as primary treatment for keloids not amenable to surgical resection. The purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience of radiation therapy for keloid management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated with radiation therapy for keloids between 2014 and 2020 at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 70 keloids in 41 patients were treated. For the 55 keloids treated with post-operative radiation therapy (16Gy delivered in 2 fractions), 82.5% (33/40) of evaluable lesions did not recur. Among the 15 keloids treated with definitive radiation therapy (24Gy delivered in 3 fractions), 78.6% (11/14) of evaluable keloids showed complete flattening, and 14.3% (2/14) had partial flattening. Both acute and late toxicities were mild, with only a single instance of grade 3 toxicity (dermatitis).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that radiation therapy has a role in reducing the risk of keloid recurrence post-operatively, and plays an important role in the definitive management of unresectable keloids.

A Novel Method for Patients With Ear Keloid: Enucleation and Fat Grafting

BACKGROUND

Keloid is a dermal fibroproliferative disease unique to humans. Due to the ambiguity in its pathophysiology and the frequent recurrence of keloid, there is no clear consensus on the treatment of keloid and there are many treatment methods defined. In order to benefit from the positive effects of fat grafting on pathological scars, we applied fat grafting to patients who underwent keloid enucleation.

METHODS

Fifteen ear keloid patients included in the study. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure by the same surgeon. Routine follow-ups and examinations were performed to evaluate the results and in addition, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) survey was used.

RESULTS

In the study, 15 patients were followed for a median (IQR) period of 21 (13-28) months. No recurrence was observed in any patient during follow-up, which occurred for a median of 21 (13-28) months. In the questionnaire filled out by the patients, the preoperative median value was found to be 48 (IQR: 12), whereas the postoperative median value was found to be 14 (IQR: 8). According to the patients, there was a statistically significant ( P < 0.05) positive improvement after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically, surgical procedures were avoided because the surgical recurrence rate was very high, but today, recurrence rates are decreasing with combined treatments. These treatment combinations may require more than one intervention and require frequent clinical follow-ups. With our technique of fat grafting after enucleation, the treatment was completed with a single operation and no additional intervention was required.

Successful treatment of Giant keloid on the right toes using trepanation combined with superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100): a case report with literature review

In dermatology, a keloid is one of the most common skin morphological abnormalities caused by excessive proliferation of fibroblasts. Keloids that are large or occur near important joint sites often cause varying degrees of physiological dysfunction in patients, therefore requiring medical treatment. A boy with congenital syndactyly developed huge keloids at the surgical site after undergoing surgical correction treatment. After treatment using trepanation combined with superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) in our hospital, most of the boy's keloids shrank and flattened. The affected foot returned to its normal appearance, and the boy could wear shoes normally. The boy did not complain of pain, numbness, or any other distinctive discomfort after completing the treatment. This suggested that the combination of trepanation and SRT-100 may be one of the options for treating hypertrophic keloids that cannot be treated by surgical excision.

The clinical efficacy of single-hole punch excision combined with intralesional steroid injection for nodular keloid treatment: a self-controlled trial

There are many methods to treat keloid, including various excision operations, laser, injection and radiotherapy. However, few studies have explored the effectiveness of single-hole punch excision in keloid treatment. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lateral punch excision combined with intralesional steroid injection for keloid treatment through self-control trial. In this self-controlled trial, 50 patients meet the diagnosis of nodular keloid, and try to choose left-right symmetrical control, one skin lesion in the control group (50 skin lesionsin total) and the other in the observation group (50 skin lesions in total).The keloids in the treatment group were initially treated with punch excision combined with intralesional steroid injection, followed by injection treatment alone. Keloids in the control group received intralesional steroid injection alone. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) of the keloid before and after the punch excision was evaluated; the keloid scores at different time points and the number of injection treatments required in both groups were compared, and adverse reactions were observed. The effective rate of the observation group was 86.0%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (66.0%), and the recurrence rate of 22% was lower than that of the control group (χ2 = 4.141,63417), all of which were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). At the end of treatment, the VSS and total injection times in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t = 5.900,3.361), with statistical significance (P < 0.01). The combination of single-hole punch excision and intralesional steroid injection is an effective method to treat multiple nodular keloids, shortening the treatment course of tralesional steroid injection without obvious adverse reactions.

Acne-induced pathological scars: pathophysiology and current treatments

Acne is a common chronic inflammatory dermatosis that can lead to pathological scars (PSs, divided into hypertrophic scars and keloids). These kinds of abnormal scars seriously reduce the quality of life of patients. However, their mechanism is still unclear, resulting in difficult clinical prevention, unstable treatment effects and a high risk of recurrence. Available evidence supports inflammatory changes caused by infection as one of the keys to abnormal proliferation of skin fibroblasts. In acne-induced PSs, increasing knowledge of the immunopathology indicates that inflammatory cells directly secrete growth factors to activate fibroblasts and release pro-inflammatory factors to promote the formation of PSs. T helper cells contribute to PSs via the secretion of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, the pro-inflammatory factors; while regulatory T cells have anti-inflammatory effects, secrete IL-10 and prostaglandin E2, and suppress fibrosis production. Several treatments are available, but there is a lack of combination regimens to target different aspects of acne-induced PSs. Overall, this review indicates that the joint involvement of inflammatory response and fibrosis plays a crucial role in acne-induced PSs, and also analyzes the interaction of current treatments for acne and PS.

An approach to achieve tension-free closure and mitigate recurrence in the management of recurrent cervical keloids

Keloid is a burdensome condition that negatively affects patient's quality of life. It is influenced by a spectrum of risk factors, including tension. We propose an approach to address the tension-free closure and optimize surgical outcomes in neck keloid. A retrospective review of neck keloid patients who underwent surgical treatment between 2014 and 2022 was performed. Five patients underwent surgical interventions. Two patients had sufficient and three had insufficient tissue redundancy. The former underwent keloid excision with tension-free closure. The latter underwent keloid excision with full thickness skin graft for tension-free closure. One patient required re-excision with free flap coverage. All patients received postoperative low dose radiation. All patients were satisfied with the results and there were no signs of keloid recurrence during the follow-up period. Tension during closure following keloid excision is a modifiable risk factor. An appropriate algorithm providing tension-free closure can minimize the recurrence.

Effective keloid management using a combinatorial continuous-wave and repeat fractionated ablative CO2 laser regimen

BACKGROUND

Keloids are benign proliferative scars that form as a result of dysregulated growth and collagen deposition in response to cutaneous injury. Laser therapies have emerged as promising options for the treatment of keloids, with performance varying by laser type and lesion characteristics.

PURPOSE

To assess the combined continuous wave and repetitive fractionated CO2 laser treatment of keloids.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 22 cases of keloid scars treated with combined CO2 laser modes. A single session of continuous wave followed by five sessions of fractional delivery. Efficacy was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale was used to assess patient satisfaction and pain.

RESULTS

Most patients were female (77.3%) with skin type IV (72.7%), age was 24.3 ± 9.3 years, most keloids were located on the earlobe (56.5%) or arm or hand (17.4%), size ranged from 5 to 10 cm, and time since injury ranged from 3 months to 35 years. No serious adverse events were reported. At 6 months, significant improvements from baseline occurred in all characteristics, scar color (4.8 ± 2.8 to 1.9 ± 1.1), rigidity (5.0 ± 2.8 vs. 5.4 ± 2.8), thickness (5.4 ± 2.8 vs. 2.0 ± 1.1), and irregularity (5.9 ± 2.4 vs. 1.9 ± 0.9). The Vancouver scores followed a similar trend. Patient-rated overall improvement from 37 ± 17.6 at baseline to 16.1 ± 8.5 at 6 months, and improvement in associated pain and pruritus.

CONCLUSION

Combination of two ablative laser delivery modes within a single laser platform provided for effective and safe keloid management and left patients highly satisfied.

Comparison of surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids for the treatment of keloids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the effect of surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids on keloids. Relevant studies reporting the recurrence rate or incidence of adverse events (AEs) were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases through August 2023. The quality of noncomparative single-arm clinical trials was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomised studies (MINORS) Methodological items. This meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata 12.0 statistical software. 26 studies involving 989 patients were included in the analysis. The recurrence rate in the laser combined with steroids therapy group (12.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.9%-18.5%) was lower than that of the surgical excision combined with radiotherapy group (13.5%, 95% CI: 6.6%-22.2%). For the incidence of AEs, relatively low incidence of atrophy (0.0%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.2%), telangiectasia (3.2%, 95% CI: 0.4%-7.6%), erythema (2.3%, 95% CI: 0.0%-10.6%), infection (0.2%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%) and high hyperpigmentation rate (8.3%, 95% CI: 4.2%-13.4%) were obtained in the surgical excision combined with radiotherapy group. Compared with surgical resection followed by radiotherapy, the combination of laser and steroids for keloids showed a lower hyperpigmentation rate (6.5%), as well as a higher incidence of atrophy (22.7%), telangiectasia (6.4%), erythema (3.3%) and infection (3.3%). Only a hypopigmentation rate of 2.9% was obtained in patients treated with surgical excision plus radiotherapy. Current evidence revealed that surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and laser combined with steroids therapy were effective and safe treatments for keloids, with relatively low recurrence rate and complication rate. Comparative studies are needed to further compare the effects of these two combination therapies on keloids.

Hydrogel Loaded with Components for Therapeutic Applications in Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are common fibroproliferative diseases following injury. Patients with pathologic scars suffer from impaired quality of life and psychological health due to appearance disfiguration, itch, pain, and movement disorders. Recently, the advancement of hydrogels in biomedical fields has brought a variety of novel materials, methods and therapeutic targets for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids, which exhibit broad prospects. This review has summarized current research on hydrogels and loaded components used in preventing and treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. These hydrogels attenuate keloid and hypertrophic scar formation and progression by loading organic chemicals, drugs, or bioactive molecules (such as growth factors, genes, proteins/peptides, and stem cells/exosomes). Among them, smart hydrogels (a very promising method for loading many types of bioactive components) are currently favoured by researchers. In addition, combining hydrogels and current therapy (such as laser or radiation therapy, etc.) could improve the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Then, the difficulties and limitations of the current research and possible suggestions for improvement are listed. Moreover, we also propose novel strategies for facilitating the construction of target multifunctional hydrogels in the future.

Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks

PURPOSE

The discovery of X-rays was followed by a variety of attempts to treat infectious diseases and various other non-cancer diseases with ionizing radiation, in addition to cancer. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the use of such radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases. Non-cancer diseases for which use of radiotherapy has currently been proposed include refractory ventricular tachycardia, neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and dementia), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, all with ongoing clinical studies that deliver radiation doses of 0.5-25 Gy in a single fraction or in multiple daily fractions. In addition to such non-cancer effects, historical indications predominantly used in some countries (e.g. Germany) include osteoarthritis and degenerative diseases of the bones and joints. This narrative review gives an overview of the biological rationale and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies for radiotherapy proposed for various non-cancer diseases, discusses the plausibility of the proposed biological rationale, and considers the long-term radiation risks of cancer and non-cancer diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing body of evidence has suggested that radiation represents a double-edged sword, not only for cancer, but also for non-cancer diseases. At present, clinical evidence has shown some beneficial effects of radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but there is little or no such evidence of radiotherapy for other newly proposed non-cancer diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, COVID-19 pneumonia). Patients with ventricular tachycardia and COVID-19 pneumonia have thus far been treated with radiotherapy when they are an urgent life threat with no efficient alternative treatment, but some survivors may encounter a paradoxical situation where patients were rescued by radiotherapy but then get harmed by radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to justify the clinical use of radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases, and optimize dose to diseased tissue while minimizing dose to healthy tissue.

Risk factors for local recurrence of keloids and hypertrophic scars after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Keloids and hypertrophic scars are benign fibroproliferative lesions that occur as a result of skin injury. Postoperative radiation therapy is used to reduce the recurrence rate because of the high recurrence rate with surgical treatment alone. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with keloid or hypertrophic scars with at least one lesion and who underwent postoperative electron beam radiotherapy at our institution from June 2013 to March 2022 were included in the study, while patients with a follow-up period of fewer than three months were excluded.

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 94 lesions in 81 patients. Exactly two years after the treatment, the actuarial local control rate was 86.4%. The chest wall, shoulder, and suprapubic area were identified as high-risk recurrence sites. Compared to other body sites, these sites had significantly lower local control rates (two-year local control rates: 75.5% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.005). After multivariate analysis, treatment site (P = 0.014), male gender (P = 0.019), and younger age (P = 0.029) were revealed to be statistically significant risk factors for local recurrence. Risk factors for keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy were therefore identified.

CONCLUSION

This result could be used for follow-up and as a determinant for the optimal dose/fractionation of postoperative radiotherapy.

Laser Combined with Radiotherapy for Keloid Treatment: A Novel and Efficient Comprehensive Therapy with a Lower Recurrence Rate

BACKGROUND

Keloids are a fibroproliferative skin disorder with a high recurrence rate. Combined therapies are often used in clinical treatment, but, in addition to the relatively high risk of relapse and complexity of the treatment process, side effects remain unknown for combination therapies.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with keloids in 131 positions were included in this retrospective study. Fractional CO 2 laser therapy was first applied with energy ranging from 360 to 1008 mJ; then, 6-Mev, 900-cGy electron beam irradiation was applied twice. The first pass was initiated within 24 hours after the laser therapy, and the second pass was performed on the seventh day after laser therapy. The Patient and Observer Scar Scale evaluated the lesions before the treatment and at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. At each follow-up visit, the patients filled out a questionnaire on recurrence, side effects, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The authors found a significant decrease in total Patient and Observer Scar Scale score [29 (23, 39) versus 61.2 ± 13.4; P < 0.001] at the 18-month follow-up compared with the baseline value (before the therapy). A total of 12.1% of the patients had recurrences during the 18-month follow-up period (11.1% partial recurrence and 1.0% complete recurrence). The total satisfaction rate was 97.0%. No severe adverse effects were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser combined with radiotherapy is a new comprehensive therapy comprising ablative lasers and radiotherapy for keloids. It had excellent clinical efficacy, low recurrence rate, and no serious adverse effects.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Progress in the clinical treatment of keloids

Keloid is a pathological scar that is higher than the skin surface following skin damage. Its lesion range often extends beyond the original damage boundary and does not naturally subside over time. Its pathogenesis is very complex, currently the main causes include fibroblast excessive proliferation, collagen and extracellular matrix (Extracellular matrix, ECM) excessive deposition, excessive angiogenesis, and so on. The traditional treatment method primarily involves surgical intervention, but it is associated with a high recurrence rate post-surgery. Consequently, many treatment methods are derived according to the different clinical characteristics of keloid. This paper will review the therapeutic progress in recent years from surgical treatment, physiotherapy, drug therapy, and biological therapy, with the goal of offering valuable insights for the clinical treatment of keloids.

Inhibition of keloid by 32P isotope radiotherapy through suppressing TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Keloid seriously affects the appearance, and is accompanied by some symptoms including pain, burning, itching. Radioactive nuclides such as 32P have been proved to be effective in inhibiting the formation of keloid, but the mechanism remains unclear.

METHODS

The keloid animal model was established through keloid tissues implantation. Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) and Masson staining were performed to investigate histological changes and collagen deposition. The mRNA and protein expression were assessed using RT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. Cell apoptosis and cycle were evaluated through flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Both 32P isotope injection and skin path significantly reduced the size of keloid, and inhibited TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. SRI-011381, the agonist of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway, markedly reversed the influence of 32P isotope on cell proliferation, cell apoptosis, cell cycle of LNCaP cells and TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

32P isotope injection and skin path greatly reduced the size of keloid, and the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway was remarkably inhibited by 32P isotope treatment. The regulation of dermal fibroblast by 32P isotope was reversed by SRI-011381. 32P isotope might inhibit keloid through suppressing TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Our study provides a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of keloid.

Rare Complication of Massive Depigmentation After Postoperative Treatment of Giant Keloid Combined With Strontium-90

Post-acne keloids have become a serious problem affecting the physical and mental health of adolescents. However, traditional single-treatment methods have a high recurrence rate and are highly susceptible to a variety of complications. Postoperative radiotherapy has rapidly become a popular choice for comprehensive postoperative treatment because of its painlessness, non-invasiveness, convenience, low recurrence rate, and few complications. 1 In the available literature, no serious complications have been reported. Here we introduce a case of keloid after acne with isotope strontium-90 as a comprehensive treatment regimen, which leads to extensive depigmentation in the maxillofacial region. Combined with knowledge of the relevant literature, the mechanisms, types, and timing and dose, and reflect on balancing of recurrence rates and complications to deepen our understanding of the disease.

Low-Dose Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Alzheimer's Dementia: Results From a Pilot Trial in Humans

PURPOSE

We report neurocognitive, imaging, ophthalmologic, and safety outcomes following low-dose whole brain radiation therapy (LD-WBRT) for patients with early Alzheimer dementia (eAD) treated in a pilot trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Trial-enrolled patients were at least 55 years of age, had eAD meeting NINCDS-ADRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) Alzheimer's Criteria with confirmatory fluorodeoxyglucose and florbetapir positron emission tomography findings; had the capacity to complete neurocognitive function, psychological function, and quality-of-life assessments; had a Rosen modified Hachinski score ≤4; and had estimated survival >12 months.

RESULTS

Five patients were treated with LD-WBRT (2 Gy × 5 over 1 week; 3 female; mean age, 73.2 years [range, 69-77]). Four of 5 patients had improved (n = 3) or stable (n = 1) Mini-Mental State Examination (second edition) T-scores at 1 year. The posttreatment scores of all 3 patients who improved increased to the average range. There were additional findings of stability of naming and other cognitive skills as well as stability to possible improvement in imaging findings. No safety issues were encountered. The only side effect was temporary epilation with satisfactory hair regrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results from 5 patients with eAD treated with LD-WBRT (10 Gy in 5 fractions) demonstrate a positive safety profile and provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating data to suggest that this treatment stabilizes or improves cognition. These findings will require further evaluation in larger, definitive, randomized trials.

Current Practice in Keloid Treatment: a Survey of Dutch Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Several therapeutic options are available for the treatment of keloids, but it remains unclear which treatment options are most commonly used by practitioners.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prevailing treatment for different keloid phenotypes among dermatologists and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Members of the Dutch society for Plastic surgery and the Dutch society for Dermatology and Venereology were asked to participate. Questions elaborated on the treatment for a small and a large keloid on the mandibula and multiple keloids on the chest.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three responses were obtained. Heterogeneity in treatment was extremely high for the small, large, and multiple keloids with 27, 35, and 33 various first choices, respectively. Intralesional corticosteroids were most often chosen for all 3 different keloid phenotypes. These were mostly (61%) administered as monotherapy for the small keloid and mostly combined with other treatments for the large keloid (19%) and multiple keloids (43%). Surgery was chosen regularly (22%) for the large keloid, mostly combined with intralesional corticosteroids (10%) or brachytherapy (8.4%).

CONCLUSION

Keloid treatment is very heterogeneous among dermatologists and plastic surgeons, even in a relatively small country as the Netherlands. Moreover, the treatment choice depends on the keloid phenotype.

The Role of Radiation Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Keloid Management: A National Survey of Radiation Oncologists

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy is a promising modality for treating keloids after surgical excision. However, it is currently not standard practice among physicians because of concern surrounding the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers, especially among pediatric patients. There is minimal research assessing the complications for radiation therapy in keloid management.

AIM

The goal of this study was to determine radiation oncologists' perspectives about the utility and appropriateness of radiation therapy for keloid management in both adult and pediatric patients. This study also aimed to characterize radiation modality, dose, fractionation, and secondary complications observed by providers.

METHODS

An electronic survey was delivered to 3102 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the United States. Rates of responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 114 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these, 113 providers (99.1%) supported radiation therapy for keloid management in adults, whereas only 54.9% supported radiation therapy for pediatric patients. Of 101 providers that treated adults in the past year, the majority used external beam: electrons (84.2%), applied 3 fraction regimens (54.4%), and delivered radiation within 24 hours postexcision (45.5%). In pediatric patients, only 42 providers reported treating at least 1 patient. The majority used electron beam radiation (76.2%), applied 3 faction regimens (65%), and delivered radiation on the same day of keloid excision (50.0%) The main concern when treating pediatric patients were risk of secondary malignancy (92.1%).

CONCLUSION

Although radiation therapy appears to be a widely accepted adjuvant treatment option for adults with keloids, the use of radiation therapy for pediatric patients is less widely accepted because of concerns regarding secondary malignancy. The findings suggest additional studies need to be carried out to assess the risk of those complications.

Evidence-based management of keloids and hypertrophic scars in dermatology

While normal, controlled wound-healing results in scars that are nearly imperceptible, hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids are the result of an abnormal wound-healing process that can leave unsightly, difficult-to-treat lesions. While such scars are classically associated with surgical incisions, they may also result from burns or accidental trauma to the skin. Several different measures can be taken to prevent the formation of scars or treat those that have already formed. Prevention focuses on reducing inflammation during the wound-healing process, and minimizing tension in the lesion when appropriate. Treatments range from non-invasive modalities such as pressure therapy, topicals, and symptom management, to invasive methods such as injections, lasers, and even surgery. While some treatments, such as corticosteroid injections, have been used in the treatment of HTS and keloids for decades, other newer therapies have only been described in case reports or are still in early phases of clinical trials. Because optimal scar management will not be the same for every patient, further investigation of newer agents and methods is warranted and may benefit a great number of patients. This paper will review the evidence-based management of scars, including current widely used treatment options and promising newly emerging therapies.

Reducing Risks of Facial Scarring

Risk factors for the formation of facial scars include skin type, ethnicity, scar location, and certain medical conditions that contribute to poor or delayed healing. Risk of scar can be reduced with appropriate surgical planning, including proper placement and design of incisions, meticulous skin closure, aseptic technique, and wound care to improve healing. Common pathologic scars include hypertrophic scars and keloid scars, each of which has unique approaches to surgical revision and medical treatment due to their respective risks of recurrence. Topical scar therapies, medical therapies, and surgical revision techniques for improvement in final scar appearance are discussed.

Therapeutic and prophylactic effects of radiation therapy in the management of recurrent granulation tissue induced tracheal stenosis: a review on the role of Endobronchial brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (mainly secondary to intubation or lung transplantation) is one of the most common etiologies of benign airway obstructions. Recurrence rates after standard treatment options (surgical resection and/or endobronchial interventions) can inadvertently worsen the stricture through the stimulation of more granulation tissue generation (via increased fibroblast activity and roliferation). Low-dose radiotherapy could be a promising tool to prevent granulation tissue formation after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions regarding its established role in the treatment of keloids or hypertrophic scars, two benign diseases with similar a pathophysiology to tracheal stenosis. This study reviews case reports and small series that used endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for the management of refractory granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Case reports and series (published up to October 2022) that reported outcomes of patients with recurrent granulation tissue-induced tracheal stenosis (after surgery and/or endobronchial interventions) treated by EBBT or EBRT (in definitive or prophylactic settings) were eligible.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies (EBBT: nine studies including 69 patients, EBRT: seven studies including 32 patients) were reviewed. The pooled success rate across all studies was 74% and 97% for EBBT and EBRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy appears to be effective in the management of selected patients with recurrent/refractory tracheal stenosis. Response to this treatment is usually good, but further studies with a larger number of patients and long-term followup are necessary to determine the optimal technique, dose, and timing of radiation therapy, late complications, the durability of response, and criteria for patient selection.

Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: Advances in Treatment and Review of Established Therapies

Hypertrophic scars and keloids can have significant detrimental effects on patients both psychosocially and functionally. A careful identification of patient risk factors and a comprehensive management plan are necessary to optimize outcomes. Patients with a history of dystrophic scarring should avoid unnecessary procedures and enhance the wound-healing process using various preventive strategies. As there is no single, fully efficacious treatment modality, prevention remains the best approach in reducing aberrant scar formation. When prevention therapies fail, keloids have been shown to be respond to a variety of therapies including topical and injectable corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, radiotherapy, lasers, and surgical excision, all with varying efficacies. As such, management should be tailored to the individual patient's risk factors with the use of combination therapies to reduce recurrence rates. Still, keloid and hypertrophic scar therapies are widely diverse with novel treatment modalities providing alternatives for recurring lesions. Laser-assisted drug delivery, skin priming, and novel topical therapies may provide alternative options for the management of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Dosimetric feasibility of direct post-operative MR-Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for resection cavities of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Post-operative radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases patients is typically planned on a post-recovery MRI, 2-4 weeks after resection. However, the intracranial metastasis may (re-)grow in this period. Planning SRS directly on the post-operative MRI enables shortening this time interval, anticipating the start of adjuvant systemic therapy, and so decreasing the chance of extracranial progression. The MRI-Linac (MRL) allows the simultaneous execution of the post-operative MRI and SRS treatment. The aim of this work was investigating the dosimetric feasibility of MRL-based post-operative SRS.

METHODS

MRL treatments based on the direct post-operative MRI were simulated, including thirteen patients with resectable single brain metastases. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured on the direct post-operative scans and compared to the post-recovery MRI GTV. Three plans for each patient were created: a non-coplanar VMAT CT-Linac plan (ncVMAT) and a coplanar IMRT MRL plan (cIMRT) on the direct post-operative MRI, and a ncVMAT plan on the post-recovery MRI as the current clinical standard.

RESULTS

Between the direct post-operative and post-recovery MRI, 15.5 % of the cavities shrunk by > 2 cc, and 46 % expanded by ≥ 2 cc. Although the direct post-operative cIMRT plans had a higher median gradient index (3.6 vs 2.7) and median V3Gy of the skin (18.4 vs 1.1 cc) compared to ncVMAT plans, they were clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Direct post-operative MRL-based SRS for resection cavities of brain metastases is dosimetrically acceptable, with the advantages of increased patient comfort and logistics. Clinical benefit of this workflow should be investigated given the dosimetric plausibility.

Multimodal Management of Facial Keloid with Tissue Expansion, Excision, and Injection of 5-FU and Triamcinolone

Keloids are benign, fibroproliferative dermal growths that occur in response to injury of the skin. These hypertrophic scars can cause pain and discomfort and have been associated with negative effects on social well-being, prompting physicians to seek effective treatment modalities with minimal risk of recurrence. Although surgical excision of the keloid initially removes the scar tissue, surgery alone triggers a fibroproliferative response similar to the initial insult, resulting in a high recurrence rate. Thus, a multimodal approach may be most appropriate when surgery is indicated to limit recurrence. We present the successful treatment of recalcitrant keloid formation of the face that was treated with tissue expansion, excision, and intralesional triamcinolone and 5-flurouracil injections.

Top cited publications for treatment of keloid with radiotherapy: A Bibliometric analysis

ABSTRACTS

The use of radiation to treat keloid scars has gained popularity during the last few decades. However, few bibliometric analyses have been performed on the published articles. This research aimed to demonstrate and evaluate the trends, top-cited articles, and frontier areas. In this cross-sectional study, Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus database literature was searched for all MESH terms related to "keloid" and "radiotherapy." The bibliometric analysis was carried out by VOSviewer 1.6.15. Articles with Web of Science-based citations of ≥20 were included. The citation per year index (CPYI) of articles was calculated for further inclusion of papers if they had CPYI higher than the mean value. There were 95 papers on keloid radiation that satisfied the inclusion criteria and were published between 1942 and 2019. The CPYI ranged from 0.38 to 11.3. Most studies were published in the "International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, and Physics" (9 papers). The United States has the most papers (14), followed by Japan (9), the Netherlands (7), and Germany (5). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis of top-cited papers on keloid radiotherapy. From 2014 to the present, it seems that this title has resurfaced as a popular topic, with radiotherapy within 24 h of surgery being the most commonly recommended treatment plan. Since around 2011, high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has been used as an effective treatment for keloid control. Individualization of therapy and dose/technique based on the location is strongly suggested.

The Efficacy of Combination Therapy Involving Excision Followed by Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil and Betamethasone, and Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Keloids: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Combined therapy for keloids is currently recommended. Surgery is one of the main options, but the measures to prevent recurrence after excision are still being explored.

Objective

The randomized controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of excision followed by intralesional low concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)(12.5 mg/mL) and betamethasone.

Methods

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Patients in group A had excision followed by 5-FU and betamethasone intralesional injections, group B had 5-FU and betamethasone intralesional injections, and group C had excision followed by radiotherapy. Efficacy parameters were assessed from 8 to 12 months, including improvement on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS), as well as side effects and recurrence. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100046025.

Results

After 4 months' treatment, the improvement of the VSS and POSAS scores in group A was not different from that in group C (P > 0.05) but was superior to that in group B (P < 0.05); the pain and pruritus of the three groups were relieved more than 50%. After 8 to 12 months' follow-up, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of side effects and recurrence among the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Excision followed by intralesional low concentrations of 5-FU (12.5mg/mL) with betamethasone is a safe and sustainable treatment for keloid, with no significant difference from excision followed by radiotherapy.

Lesion Site Is the Key Prognostic Factor for Keloid Patients Receiving Surgery With Adjuvant Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Keloid is a benign tumor with high recurrence rate; accordingly, complete surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments. This study reviewed outcomes of keloid patients receiving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients received radiation dose with 15 Gy, with their first radiotherapy within 24 hours after surgical excision. The end points were recurrence rate and local recurrence-free interval (LRFI), defined clinically as palpable gross tumor over the treatment site and duration from the last day of radiotherapy to disease recurrence.

RESULTS

From May 2017 to July 2020, 32 patients with 40 keloid lesions were included. The mean age for these patients was 37.6 years, and the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The overall recurrence rate was 52.5%, and the median LRFI was 9.7 months. Recurrence rates for males and females were 46.7% and 56% ( P = 0.567), respectively; for head and ear, chest, shoulder and upper extremities, and abdomen and back were 12.5%, 61.5%, 63.6%, and 62.5% ( P = 0.093); for lesions over 20 cm 2 and below 20 cm 2 were 62.5% and 50% ( P = 0.527); and for megavoltage electron beam and kilovoltage photon beam were 56.7% and 40% ( P = 0.361), respectively. Patients were further classified into 2 groups by lesion sites, which showed lower recurrence rate ( P = 0.011) and longer LRFI ( P = 0.028) with lesions over the head and ear than other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that lesion site might be a prognostic factor for keloid recurrence. Adjuvant radiation dose escalation for high-recurrence risk areas (other than the head and ear) might be required.

Current advances in the selection of adjuvant radiotherapy regimens for keloid

Keloid is a common benign skin tumor in the outpatient department, and patients are often accompanied by itching and pain. Since the pathogenesis is unknown, the effect of single method treatment is unsatisfactory, and therefore the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, comprehensive treatment is mostly used in clinical treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently one of the most effective treatments for keloid. After long-term clinical practice, brachytherapy and electron beam radiotherapy has increasingly become the gold standard of treatment, because brachytherapy provides more focused radiation treatment to focal tissue to significantly reduce recurrence rate, and better preserve normal tissue. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques, more options for the treatment of keloid. Currently, adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely recognized, but there is no consensus on the optimal protocol for adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids. This review provides a review of published treatment options and new radiotherapy techniques for adjuvant radiotherapy of keloids and gives a comprehensive evaluation for clinical treatment.

Skin endothelial cell and microcirculation function study in recurred keloids patients after keloid surgery and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Keloid is a type of benign tumor of the skin with abnormal proliferation of fibrous tissue. We sought to observe the changes in skin microcirculation and endothelial cell function around the recurred keloid and explore the skin microcirculation characters in recurred keloid patients.

METHODS

Six patients with recurred keloid were treated with keloid surgery and radiotherapy for the second time. Microcirculation of recurred keloids and their surrounding normal skin tissue was observed with laser Doppler flowmeter before operation. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD31, and HIF-1α were identified by several assay.

RESULTS

The local blood flow of group RN was enhanced. The average strength of group N is 0.87. The average strength of group RN is 2.08. The expression of VEGF, CD31, and hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) protein in the keloid-recurred skin (RN) group was higher than the normal skin group via immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blotting analysis. The relative expression of VEGF and CD31 mRNA was significantly increased in RN group samples (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in the expression of VEGF, CD31, and HIF-1α in the recurred keloid skin after radiotherapy and normal skin. They may be used as potential biomarkers and targets for future research on keloid recurrence.

Radiation-induced FAP + fibroblasts are involved in keloid recurrence after radiotherapy

Background: Keloid scars (KSs), which are composed of abnormal hyperplastic scar tissue, form during skin wound healing due to excessive fibroblast activation and collagen secretion. Although surgical resection and radiation therapy are used to prevent recurrence, KS recurrence rates range from 15 to 23%, and the underlying mechanism is unclear.

Methods: To elucidate the mechanism of keloid recurrence, we established a PDX model and the grafts remained for over 20 weeks after transplantation on the bilateral backs of the NCG mice.

Results: RNA-seq revealed that KS tissue gene expression was highly consistent before and after transplantation. Then, one side of the KS graft was irradiated with electron beam therapy (10 Gy), significant increases in vimentin and fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) expression were observed after irradiation and were accompanied by severe microvascular destruction. Surprisingly, 4 weeks after irradiation, significantly increased recurrence was observed with increased FAP + tissue and cell cycle regulator expression, resulting in a remarkable altered graft volume. Moreover, irradiation-induced FAP upregulation markedly facilitated radiation resistance and increased cell cycle progression, decreased senescence, and increased energy production.

Conclusion: Our findings revealed that irradiation causes increased abundance of FAP + cells, which was associated with cell proliferation and delayed cellular senescence, accompanied by ATP production.

Ear Keloids Treated with Postoperative Electrons: A Case Series

Introduction Multiple modalities exist for treating keloids ranging from surgical, medical, chemotherapeutic, and radiation therapy. Different techniques of radiation therapy have been used to treat keloids as an adjuvant to surgical excision. With this case series, we report our experience of using electron beam radiation therapy in this setting.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 ear keloids treated in 10 patients from January 2013 to October 2015 with surgical excision followed by electron beam to a dose of 10 Gy in two fractions over two consecutive days in immediate postoperative period. Patients were evaluated for recurrent lesions, cosmesis, and adverse effects.

Results With a median follow-up of 78 months (range: 67–100 months), recurrent lesion was seen in five cases; a local control rate of 68.75% was seen. Median recurrence-free period was 67 months (range: 12–100 months). Acceptable cosmesis was seen in all cases and no acute or chronic adverse effects were seen.

Conclusion The large follow-up period in our series establishes the role of electron beam radiation therapy in attaining long-term control in keloid patients. The lower total dose with higher dose per fraction used in our patients has acceptable control along with good cosmesis and absent adverse effects.

Sports Bras Improve Chest Keloids but Outcomes Are Dependent on Breast Size: A Retrospective Analysis

Our study is a retrospective medical record review performed on 95 female keloid patients with the standard therapy combining complete surgical excision with superficial X-ray radiation. We aimed to analyze the relationship between breast size and treatment outcomes as well as the benefits of sports bras in the postoperative management of keloids. The results showed that the keloid score of no sports bra group was significantly worse than the score of sports bra group at 1-year follow-up. In addition, the large breast size group showed more significant improvement of keloid score when wearing sports bras. Our study highlights that continuous wearing a sports bra effectively reduces the skin tension of the postoperative incision and promotes recovery, especially for patients with large breast size.

The Efficacy of CT-Based Conformal Electron Beam Radiation Therapy After Keloid Excision

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant computed tomography-based conformal electron beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with keloids enables radiation oncologists to customize the target volume with precision and deliver the maximal prescription dose while sparing normal surrounding tissues.

OBJECTIVE

To report treatment and cosmetic outcomes by the patient's self-assessment survey.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with keloids, who were treated with postoperative electron beam RT between January 2015 and December 2020, were reviewed. A total of 85 consecutive patients with 136 keloids were included in this study. Subjective cosmetic outcomes were scored by each patient using a 5-point Likert scale survey.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 29.0 months (range, 12.1-77.9 months), and local recurrence was observed in 10 lesions (7.4%). The recurrence rate of keloids occurring in the ear was 5.4%, whereas the recurrence rate of keloids occurring at other body sites was 11.4%. Among the patients who responded to the questionnaire about the cosmetic outcome, 70.2% of patients declared being either very satisfied (44.7%) or satisfied (25.5%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical excision, followed by CT-based conformal electron beam RT, for patients with keloids ensures a high degree of local control resulting in good cosmetic outcomes.

Optimizing surgical outcome of auricular keloid with a novel multimodal approach

Various treatments are available for auricular keloids, but none has an absolute advantage. A practical and safe therapy to optimize the surgical outcome for auricular keloids is needed. We adopted a multimodal treatment of surgical enucleation, core fillet flap reconstruction, intraoperative corticosteroid injection, and immediate postoperative radiotherapy. There were no routine intralesional corticosteroid injections during follow-up. Keloid recurrences, complications, and risk factors for recurrences were analyzed. The outcome was compared with other published literatures. 45 auricular keloids were included in this study. 85.7% were female with an average age of 27.1 ± 7.5 years, and averaged size was 1.8 × 1.2 ± 0.9 × 0.6 cm. 71.1% were located at ear helix with 28.9% at the ear lobe. Nine keloids were classified as Chang-Park classification type I, 30 for type II, two for type III, and four for IV. The average radiation dosage was 1578.6 cGy. The recurrence rate was 6.7% at an average 24.1-month follow-up. There were no complications of surgery, radiotherapy, and intralesional corticosteroid injection. Our recurrence rate was lower than those in mono-adjuvant therapies of intraoperative corticosteroid injection or radiotherapy. This one-session multimodal approach optimizes treating auricular keloids with a low recurrence rate and minimal post-radiation and long-term corticosteroid injection-related complications.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Keloids

Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic methods for keloids, and the irradiation technique has innovated from superficial X-ray to brachytherapy after decades of clinical practice. At present, the application of adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely accepted by clinicians, while the consensus of optimal adjuvant radiotherapy strategies for keloids has not been reached. Factors such as radiation timing, dose, fractions, and lesion locations may be associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with keloids after radiotherapy while a comprehensive review is lacking. Herein, this review summarized the published literature of adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids involving mechanism, timing, dose, fractions, and complications, etc., which may facilitate clinical decision making.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The outcome of postoperative radiation therapy following plastic surgical resection of recurrent ear keloid: a single institution experience

Background

Ear keloids are abnormal continuously growing healing process following cutaneous injury. Surgical excision is the standard treatment strategy; however, 50–80% of cases develop recurrence. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is commonly offered with a marked decrease in the recurrence rate. The variation in RT protocols used in different studies leads to a bias of results analysis. The aim is to present our experience of using surgical excision with postoperative radiotherapy for recurrent ear keloids. Also, studying different variables especially dose and keloid size that affects recurrence rate. Radiotherapy complications were reported and assessed.

Patients and methods

Keloids between 2006 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-five ear keloids out of 83 cases who received RT after surgical excision were included in the study. Different dose regimens including 13 Gy/1fx, 8 Gy/1fx, 10 Gy/2fx, 15 Gy/3fx, and other fractionated regimens were used. The Median follow-up period was 35 months. Recurrence-free rate (RFR), side effects, and prognostic factors were assessed.

Results

The overall 2-year RFR was 88 ± 5%. The 2-year RFR was 83 ± 8% for dose regimens with biological effective dose (BED) ≤ 40 and 92 ± 5% for regimens with BED > 40 Gy with an insignificant p value. The 2-year RFR was 74 ± 10% compared to 97 ± 3% for keloids > 2 cm and keloids ≤ 2 cm respectively (p value 0.02). The higher dose used for keloids with > 2 cm size significantly improved RFR. The orthovoltage therapy showed marginally better 2-year RFR compared to electron beam therapy; however, statistically insignificant (p value 0.09). The side effects were minimal with no reported second malignancy or serious G3-4 complications.

Conclusion

Excision followed by RT is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent ear keloids. Low and modest radiation doses are effective; however, a higher dose is recommended for keloids > 2 cm. We recommend a prospective larger-scale study to test the effect of dose and keloid size on the treatment results.

The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago

BACKGROUND

In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.

METHODS

All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.

RESULTS

Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.

Efficacy of Surgical Excision and Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Keloids: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the efficacy of a protocol combining surgical excision and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of keloids.

METHODS

The authors performed a unicentric retrospective cohort study between 2013 and 2018. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. All patients treated for keloids at the authors' institution were included. Extralesional excision was performed with placement of a brachytherapy sheath under the skin. The total dose of irradiation was 18 Gy. The postoperative results were evaluated for aesthetic and functional outcomes with a validated scale, as well as the presence or absence of recurrence.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight patients with 67 keloids were included. The control rate was 94%. The aesthetic and functional outcomes were considered good in 62% of cases. The main limitation of the study was the small patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Extralesional excision combined with postoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy seems to be one of the most effective invasive protocols to treat and prevent keloids.

Keloid scars. Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment

Cicatricial skin hypertrophy includes keloids and hypertrophic scars. Keloid scarring is thought to result from an imbalance between increased synthesis of collagen and extracellular matrix and decreased degradation of these products. Current knowledge of keloid pathophysiology prompts clinicians to investigate new methods for the diagnosis and treatment of keloids, as well as their prevention.

Current Advances in Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Management

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are caused by excessive tissue response to dermal injury due to local fibroblast proliferation and collagen overproduction. This response occurs because of pathologic wound healing due to dysregulation in the inflammatory, proliferative, and/or remodeling phase. Patients with hypertrophic scars or keloids report reduced quality of life, physical status, and psychological health. Hypertrophic scars or keloids will develop in 30 to 90% of individuals, and despite their prevalence, treatment remains a challenge. Of the treatments currently available for hypertrophic scars and keloids few have been adequately supported by studies with appropriate experimental design. Here, we aim to review the available literature to provide up-to-date information on the etiology, epidemiology, histology, pathophysiology, prevention, and management options available for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids and highlight areas where further research is required.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Surgical Excision in Keloids

Keloids are a benign fibroproliferative disease with a high tendency of recurrence. Keloids cause functional impairment, disfigurement, pruritus, and low quality of life. Many therapeutic options have been used for keloids. However, the high recurrence rates have led to the use of adjuvant therapy after surgical keloid excision. There are different radiotherapy regimens available, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are still unclear. The aim of this review is to explain the appropriate radiotherapy regimen for keloids as well as discuss the recent reports on keloid management with radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical excision for keloids yields excellent local control with tolerable side effects. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with a BED of more than 28 Gy (α/β value of 10) after excision is recommended in the light of its biologic background.