Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:258-262. [PMID: 19542858 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181a6ec7c]

Early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation (EMDAL) as a surgical technique for splenectomy and shunt surgery in portal hypertension

Backgrounds/Aims

Splenectomy is the most frequently performed procedure as definitive management or as part of shunt surgery or devascularization in portal hypertension. Splenectomy is technically challenging because of the frequent coexistence of multiple collateral varices, splenomegaly, poor liver function, and thrombocytopenia. Early arterial ligation and late mobilization (EALDEM) is the traditional method for splenectomy in portal hypertension. Early spleen mobilization offers good control of the hilum. We aim to compare the effect of the early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation (EMDAL) technique with that of the conventional splenectomy technique in patients with portal hypertension.

Methods

During the study period from September 2011 to September 2022, 173 patients underwent surgical intervention for portal hypertension at our institution. Among these patients, 114 underwent the conventional method of splenectomy (early arterial ligation and late splenic mobilization) while 59 underwent splenectomy with the EMDAL technique. Demographics were compared between the two groups. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test in each group. A minimum follow-up of 12 months was performed in each group.

Results

Demographics and type of surgical procedure were comparable in the two surgical method groups. Median blood loss was higher in the conventional group than in the EMDAL method. The median duration of surgery was comparable in the two surgical procedures. Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV complications were reported more frequently in the conventional group.

Conclusions

The splenic hilum can be controlled well and bleeding can be minimised with early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation.

A Simple Technique of Tunnel Constructing for Occluding Splenic Vessels During Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Cirrhosis

Purpose: Dissecting and ligating the splenic artery is crucial for bleeding control during laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). However, for patients with portal hypertension from liver cirrhosis, it is difficult for identification and ligation because the splenic vessel is circuitous and dilated. The aim of this study was to describe a simple technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels during LS in patients with portal hypertension. Materials and Methods: The clinical data of 61 patients who underwent LS from April 2016 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. In 27 patients, the tunnel construction (TC) behind the tail of the pancreas approach was performed owning to difficulty in dissecting and ligating the splenic artery (TC group), including 17 patients who received the TC method directly and 10 patients who received the TC method after trying to dissect the splenic artery. The remaining 34 patients underwent traditional ligating of the splenic artery (LA group). The peri- and postoperative outcomes of operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative oral diet intake, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate of the two groups were analyzed. All the operations were completed by the same group of surgeons. Results: All 61 operations were successfully completed. Compared with patients in the LA group, patients in the TC group had less blood loss (120.37 ± 40.74 mL versus 162.65 ± 87.47 mL; t = -2.317, P = .024). There was no statistical difference of operative time, conversion rate, complication rate, postoperative hospital stays, and follow-up between the two groups. Conclusions: The technique of constructing a tunnel behind the tail of the pancreas for occluding the splenic vessels was effective and safe in those patients whose splenic artery was difficult to dissect and ligate.

Safety and Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Advanced Liver Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric (MBS) surgery in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of data of patients with advanced liver fibrosis undergoing MBS at a tertiary care centre. Weight loss and complications were analysed. Transient elastography and liver biopsy findings 1 year after surgery were compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had cirrhosis and 16 had stage 3 fibrosis; all were Child Pugh A. Majority (76%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Mean excess BMI loss was 65.8 ± 18.9%. There were no leaks or 30-day mortality. One patient with cirrhosis had late mortality due to liver decompensation. Preoperative and postoperative median LSM were 15.5 kPa (interquartile range IQR = 24.4-11.6) and 10.9 kPa (IQR 19.3-7.6), respectively. Preoperative and postoperative median CAP were 352.5 dB/m (IQR = 372-315.5) and 303 dB/m (IQR 331-269.5), respectively. On follow-up biopsy, nine of twelve patients had improvement in fibrosis, while three had no change. Four out of five patients in the cirrhotic cohort had improvement in fibrosis stage and LSM improved in all of them. Five out of seven patients with stage 3 fibrosis had an improvement in fibrosis stage and none progressed to cirrhosis. LSM improved in three of these five patients.

CONCLUSION

MBS has the potential to ameliorate advanced liver fibrosis, including cirrhosis. Transient elastography can be used as an effective tool for screening and follow-up of liver disease in patients undergoing MBS.

Concomitant Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Concomitant laparoscopic splenectomy and cholecystectomy (CLSC) is performed for concurrent pathologies of the spleen and gallbladder. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available evidence on its indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were searched from the beginning of time (last search: December 6, 2019) for studies reporting on CLSC. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) quality assessment tool was utilized for the evaluation of eligible articles. Results: Eight studies met inclusion criteria and concerned collectively 108 patients (53 males and 55 females) with a mean age of 27.02 ± 20.48 years (mean, SD). The most common surgery indications were hereditary spherocytosis (38.9%) and sickle cell disease or β-thalassemia (32.4%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy preceded splenectomy in the majority of cases (75%). A five-trocar approach was most frequently (89.8%) utilized. The mean operation duration was 170.18 ± 53.07 minutes (mean, SD). Resected spleen weight was 601.82 ± 386.02 g (mean, SD) and had a length of 18.74 ± 5.3 cm (mean, SD). The conversion rate was 2.7%, while 20.4% of included cases experienced postoperative complications. Most frequent ones included pulmonary infection (6.5%) and portal/splenic vein thrombosis (4.6%). No postoperative death was recorded. Mean hospitalization period was 5.43 ± 3.18 days (mean, SD). Conclusions: CLSC is a safe and feasible operation for simultaneous diseases of the spleen and gallbladder that require elective procedures. High-quality clinical trials are essential to further elucidate clinical evidence and standardize operative technique.

A novel preoperative scoring system to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has been proven to be a safe and advantageous procedure. To ensure that resections of appropriate difficulty are selected, an objective preoperative grading of difficulty is required. We aimed to develop a predictive difficulty grading of LS based on intraoperative complications.

METHODS

A total of 272 non-traumatic patients who underwent LS were identified from a regional medical center. Patients were randomized into a training cohort (n = 222) and a validation cohort (n = 50). Data on demographics, medical and surgical history, operative and pathological characteristics, and postoperative outcome details were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for intraoperative complications were performed to develop a difficulty scoring system. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the difficulty grading score and intraoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discriminatory power of this scoring system.

RESULTS

Three preoperative factors (spleen weight, esophagogastric varices, and INR) had a significant effect on operative time, bleeding, and conversion to open surgery. We created a difficulty grading score with three levels of difficulty: low (≤ 4 points), medium (5-6 points), and high (≥ 7 points), based on the three preoperative parameters. The correlation was highly significant (P < 0.01) according to Spearman's correlation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.695 (95% CI 0.630-0.755). The external validation showed significant correlations with the present model, with an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.580-0.842). The comparison between our difficulty score and the previous grading system in the 272-patient cohort presented a significant difference in the AUC (0.701, 95% CI 0.643-0.755 vs. 0.644, 95% CI 0.584-0.701, P = 0.0452).

CONCLUSION

The present difficulty scoring system, based on preoperative factors, has good performance in predicting the risk of intraoperative complications of LS and could be helpful for enabling appropriate case selection with respect to the current experience of a surgeon.

Laparoscopic selective esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

Introduction

The role of laparoscopic selective esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy (LSEGDS) in the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding and hypersplenism in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension has not been well studied.

Aim

To investigate the safety and efficacy of LSEGDS for esophagogastric variceal bleeding and hypersplenism in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Material and methods

From May 2011 to December 2014, 74 patients with portal hypertension resulting from liver cirrhosis underwent surgery for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and hypersplenism. Forty-one of these patients underwent laparoscopic esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy (LEGDS), and the others underwent LSEGDS. A retrospective comparative analysis of clinical data was conducted between the two groups, including clinical characteristics, laboratory data, operative morbidity and mortality, and outcomes of follow-up.

Results

The operation was completed successfully in all the patients, except that conversion was required in one patient in the LEGDS group. The operating time was similar in both groups (p = 0.579). The intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LSEGDS group (p = 0.011). Postoperative complications showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality rate, pleural effusion, pancreatic injury, pulmonary infection, liver dysfunction, or postoperative abdominal bleeding. Postoperative platelet counts increased significantly more in the LEGDS group than in the LSEGDS group (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the long-term follow-up data, such as incidence of rebleeding, portal vein thrombosis, hepatic encephalopathy and survival (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The LSEGDS is a safe and effective procedure for management of cirrhotic portal hypertension, especially in patients with visible paraesophageal veins.

Liver Retraction Using n-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate (NBCA) Glue during Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection in Cirrhotic Patients

Background

Although liver retraction using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue has been applied to laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery in noncirrhotic patients, there is still no consensus on its safety and feasibility for cirrhotic patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of liver retraction using NBCA glue during laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) for gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Methods

Thirty-nine gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension patients were included in our study. We performed LSD in the presence of NBCA glue (n = 22, NBCA group) and absence of NBCA glue (n = 17, n-NBCA group), respectively. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, and liver function were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no mortality during the operation. One patient in non-NBCA group received open surgery due to parenchyma hemorrhage. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in 2 cases of the NBCA group and 1 of the non-NBCA group. One showed left subphrenic abscess in the non-NBCA group. No postoperative bleeding occurred after 9-30 months of follow-up. The time of operation in NBCA group was significantly shorter than those in n-NBCA group (198.86±17.86 versus 217.81±20.25min, P<0.01). Blood loss in NBCA group was significantly lower than non-NBCA group (159.09±56.98 versus 212.50±88.51 ml, P<0.05). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were increased on day 1 after LSD and decreased to normal level on day 7 after LSD in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization and liver function between the two groups.

Conclusion

Liver retraction using NBCA glue during LSD for gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is safe, effective, and feasible.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Benign Hematological Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction in the early 1990s, laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has gained worldwide acceptance for spleen removal, especially in hematological patients.

AIM

The present review summarizes the current knowledge and results of LS for the treatment of benign hematological diseases in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE/PubMed database research was performed using the terms: "laparoscopic splenectomy" OR "laparoscopy" OR "splenectomy" AND "hematological disorders" OR "hematological disease" OR "hematology" AND "adults" as key words. We set our analysis starting date as January 1st 2010 and the end date as December 31st 2016. We identified 247 relative articles. All the references from the identified articles were searched for relevant information.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were deemed appropriate for our analysis. LS was found to be feasible and safe in the majority of patients with benign hematological disorders, with a mortality rate ranging from 0% to less than 4% and the postoperative complications rate from 0% to 35.7%. The conversion rate was also very low (4%) and response (complete or partial) was achieved in more than 80% of patients. Lateral approach with four trocars was the most commonly used approach with concommitant cholecystectomy being correlated with increased operative time and morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Current literature holds that whenever splenectomy is required for the treatment of hematological disorders in adults, a laparoscopic approach should be offered as the gold standard. However, to strengthen the clinical evidence in favor of LS, more high-quality clinical trials on several issues of the procedure are necessary.

The Best Anticoagulation Strategy for Cirrhotic Patients who Underwent Splenectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

To determine the best anticoagulation strategy for the patients who underwent splenectomy with cirrhosis through network meta-analysis.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database. We extracted data on incidence of Portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) from studies that compared various anticoagulation strategies for use with patients who underwent splenectomy with cirrhosis. Network meta-analysis was conducted in ADDIS by evaluating the different incidence of PVST. Consistency and inconsistency models were developed to identify differences among the therapeutic strategies. Cumulative probability was utilized to rank the strategies under examination. Results. A total of 11 studies containing 1153 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The results revealed that the application of Antithrombin III was the best anticoagulation option for patients who underwent splenectomy with cirrhosis (P = 0.59). The data of consistency and inconsistency models exhibited basically consistent and showed good convergence.

Conclusions

Application of Antithrombin III seemed to be the best anticoagulation strategy for cirrhotic patients who underwent splenectomy and should be considered a first-choice clinical reference.

Indocyanine green retention is a potential prognostic indicator after splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (SPD) is an effective treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and hypersplenism in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICGR15) was reported to offer better sensitivity and specificity than the Child-Pugh classification in hepatectomy, but few reports describe ICGR15 in SPD. The present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ICGR15 for cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension who underwent SPD.

METHODS

From January 2012 to January 2015, 43 patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism caused by liver cirrhosis were admitted in our center and received SPD. The ICGR15, Child-Pugh classification, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and perioperative characteristics were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Preoperative liver function assessment revealed that 34 patients were Child-Pugh class A with ICGR15 of 13.6%-43.0% and MELD score of 7-20; 8 patients were class B with ICGR15 of 22.8%-40.7% and MELD score of 7-17; 1 patient was class C with ICGR15 of 39.7% and MELD score of 22. The optimal ICGR15 threshold for liver function compensation was 31.2%, which offered a sensitivity of 68.4% and a specificity of 70.8%. Univariate analysis showed preoperative ICGR15, MELD score, surgical procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and autologous blood transfusion were significantly different between postoperative liver function compensated and decompensated groups. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ICGR15 was an independent risk factor of postoperative liver function recovery (P=0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

ICGR15 has outperformed the Child-Pugh classification for assessing liver function in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. ICGR15 may be a suitable prognostic indicator for cirrhotic patients after SPD.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy for the Elderly Liver Cirrhotic Patients With Hypersplenism: A Retrospective Comparable Study

A growing body of evidence has supported the benefits of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for hypersplenism due to liver cirrhosis. With the increased proportion of elderly persons worldwide, it is necessary to investigate the risks and benefits of LS in elderly liver cirrhotic patients.From September 2003 to March 2012, LS and open splenectomy (OS) were performed for 21 (Group 1) and 19 (Group 3) patients, respectively, all of whom were 65 years of age and older; in addition, 39 patients who were <65 years old were treated with LS and referred to as Group 2. Data (i.e., demographic characteristics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information) were retrospectively collected. Between-group comparisons were performed for the above-mentioned data.Compared with the patients in Group 3, the patients in Group 1 required longer operative times, fewer transfusions, less intensive care, a shorter postoperative course, and a shorter time to the first oral intake, and they had less blood loss and fewer postoperative short-term complications. During the follow-up period, compared with the preoperative status, significant changes in hemoglobin, leukocyte, platelet, and albumin levels were observed in all groups, whereas changes in the total BILirubin (BIL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were inconspicuous.Patients >65 years of age with hypersplenism caused by liver cirrhosis can safely undergo LS.

Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy is considered the gold standard for resecting normal-to-moderately bigger spleens in benign conditions, and in addition could be tried for patients with malignant splenic disorders. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism is not well-known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis by comparing with the open splenectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Several databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria from January 2000 to June 2015. The subsequent key words were utilized for browsing "laparoscopy" or "laparoscopic", "open", "splenectomy", and "liver cirrhosis". Studies evaluating laparoscopic and open splenectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis were incorporated. Two evaluators personally strained the title and abstract of each publication. Citations with contemplated compliance within our eligibility criteria underwent compressed review. Meta-analysis was carried out according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration software (review manager 5.1).

RESULTS

Seven studies containing 509 patients were included. Compared with the open splenectomy group, patients in the laparoscopic splenectomy group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD=210.30; 95% CI: 11.28-409.32; P=0.04), longer operative time (MD=-31.58; 95% CI: -53.34--9.82; P=0.004), shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (MD=3.41; 95% CI: 2.39-4.43; P<0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.34; 95% CI: 0.88-2.01; P=0.17), and decreased liver damage [ALT (MD=8.52; 95% CI: 0.19-16.85; P=0.05) and total bilirubin (MD=5.12; 95% CI: 0.37-9.87; P=0.03)].

CONCLUSION

Hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis and portal hypertension should not be a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in cirrhotic patients with choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has become the standard procedure for most choledocholithiasis patients, the application of this procedure to liver cirrhosis is still in debate. The aim of current study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LCBDE in choledocholithiasis patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2012, 346 LCBDE performed in our hospital. According to previous defined liver condition, the patients were divided into group A (liver cirrhosis, n=132) and group B (without cirrhosis, n=214). The perioperative data for the 2 groups were retrospectively reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

LCBDE was successfully completed in 326 patients. Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was necessary for 20 patients (5.7%) mainly because of hemorrhage (5, 25%) and severe adhesions (8, 40%); a T-tube was placed in 211 patients (64.7%), and primary closure was done in 115 (35.3%). There was significant difference for groups A and B in term of intraoperative blood loss (85 vs. 35 mL; P<0.01). However, the 2 groups showed no significant differences with respect to mean operation time (2.1 vs. 1.9 h; P=0.07), complication rates (10.6% vs. 8.8%; P=0.6), and mean hospital stay (4.2 vs. 4.0 d; P=0.6), conversion rate (5.3% vs. 6.1%; P=0.77), and retained choledocholithiasis rate (8.3% vs. 7.1%; P=0.65). There was no mortality in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

LCBDE is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure for choledocholithiasis patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Should we routinely transfuse platelet for immune thrombocytopenia patients with platelet count less than 10 × 10⁹/L who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is considered as the gold standard procedure for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In many institutions, platelet counts less than 10 × 10(9)/L contraindicate LS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of LS for ITP patients with platelet counts less than 10 × 10(9)/L.

METHODS

A total of 88 cases of LS were performed for ITP patients from June 2010 to December 2012. The patients were prospectively divided into three groups based on their immediate preoperative platelet count: < 10 × 10(9)/L (group 1); 10 × 10(9)/L to 30 × 10(9)/L (group 2); and > 30 × 10(9)/L (group 3). We collected the patients' demographic characteristics, perioperative details, and platelet count response to surgery.

RESULTS

The patients in the three groups had comparable demographic characteristics. Only one patient in group 1 required conversion (2.4 %). The patients in group 1 experienced more blood loss than those in group 3, but this was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between group 2 and group 3 in terms of operating time and blood loss. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups with regard to complications and postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe and feasible to perform LS in ITP patients with platelet count less than 10 × 10(9)/L, without platelet transfusion. The indication for platelet transfusion during LS for ITP patients should be the bleeding manifestations due to thrombocytopenia other than low platelet count itself.

A meta-analysis study of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy with or without esophagogastric devascularization in the management of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and LS with esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) were the minimally invasive alternative for portal hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials was performed to assess our questions noted above. The databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springerlink were searched.

RESULTS

In total, 725 patients with liver cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension from eight published comparative trials were included. The operation time in the laparoscopic group was more than that in the open group [weighted mean difference (WMD) 35.24 (16.74, 53.74); P<.001]. However, there were less intraoperative blood loss [WMD -194.84 (-321.34, -68.34); P=.003] and a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD -4.33 (-5.30, -3.36); P<.001] in the laparoscopic group. The incidence of complications was similar in the two groups. In the subgroup studies about LS versus open splenectomy, no significant differences were found in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates. The postoperative hospital stay in the LS group was apparently decreased [WMD -4.07 (-4.93, -3.21); P<.001]. Although the operation time of LSED was longer [WMD 43.23 (17.13, 69.32); P=.001], LSED was associated with less intraoperative blood loss [WMD -189.26 (-295.71, -82.81); P<.001] and a shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD -5.41 (-7.84, -2.98); P<.001]. Meta-analysis did not favor either LSED or open splenectomy with esophagogastric devascularization in term of complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis were in favor of LS and LSED for being a safe, minimally invasion alternative for patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in cirrhotic patients with choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has become the standard procedure for most choledocholithiasis patients, the application of this procedure to liver cirrhosis is still in debate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LCBDE in choledocholithiasis patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2012, 346 LCBDEs were performed in our hospital. According to the previously defined liver condition, the patients were divided into group A (liver cirrhosis, n=132) and group B (without cirrhosis, n=214). The perioperative data for the 2 groups were retrospectively reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

LCBDE was successfully completed in 326 patients. Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was necessary for 20 patients (5.7%) mainly because of hemorrhage (5, 25%) and severe adhesions (8, 40%). A T-tube was placed in 211 patients (64.7%), and primary closure was performed in 115 (35.3%) patients. There was a significant difference for groups A and B in terms of intraoperative blood loss (85 vs. 35 mL; P<0.01). However, the 2 groups showed no significant differences with respect to the mean operation time (2.1 vs. 1.9 h; P=0.07), complication rates (10.6% vs. 8.8%; P=0.6), mean hospital stay (4.2 vs. 4.0 d; P=0.6), conversion rate (5.3% vs. 6.1%; P=0.77), and retained choledocholithiasis rate (8.3% vs. 7.1%; P=0.65). There was no mortality in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LCBDE is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure for choledocholithiasis patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Management of thrombocytopenia in advanced liver disease

Thrombocytopenia (defined as a platelet count <150×10(9)) is a well-known complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and has been observed in 76% to 85% of patients. Significant thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50×10(9) to 75×10(9)) occurs in approximately 13% of patients with cirrhosis. Thrombocytopenia can negatively impact the care of patients with severe liver disease by potentially interfering with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Multiple factors can contribute to the development of thrombocytopenia including splenic platelet sequestration, immunological processes, bone marrow suppression by chronic viral infection, and reduced levels or activity of the hematopoietic growth factor thrombopoietin. The present review focuses on the etiologies and management options for severe thrombocytopenia in the setting of advanced liver disease.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Since the first laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was reported in 1991, LS has become the gold standard for the removal of normal to moderately enlarged spleens in benign conditions. Compared with open splenectomy, fewer postsurgical complications and better postoperative recovery have been observed, but LS is contraindicated for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis in many institutions owing to technical difficulties associated with splenomegaly, well-developed collateral circulation, and increased risk of bleeding. With the improvements of laparoscopic technique, the concept is changing. This article aims to give an overview of the latest development in laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Despite a lack of randomized controlled trial, the publications obtained have shown that with meticulous surgical techniques and advanced instruments, LS is a technically feasible, safe, and effective procedure for hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis and portal hypertension and contributes to decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less impairment of liver function. It is recommended that the dilated short gastric vessels and other enlarged collateral circulation surrounding the spleen be divided with the LigaSure vessel sealing equipment, and the splenic artery and vein be transected en bloc with the application of the endovascular stapler. To support the clinical evidence, further randomized controlled trials about this topic are necessary.

Management of thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis: A review

Thrombocytopenia is a common complication in liver disease and can adversely affect the treatment of liver cirrhosis, limiting the ability to administer therapy and delaying planned surgical/diagnostic procedures because of an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple factors, including splenic sequestration, reduced activity of the hematopoietic growth factor thrombopoietin, bone marrow suppression by chronic hepatitis C virus infection and anti-cancer agents, and antiviral treatment with interferon-based therapy, can contribute to the development of thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients. Of these factors, the major mechanisms for thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis are (1) platelet sequestration in the spleen; and (2) decreased production of thrombopoietin in the liver. Several treatment options, including platelet transfusion, interventional partial splenic embolization, and surgical splenectomy, are now available for severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients. Although thrombopoietin agonists and targeted agents are alternative tools for noninvasively treating thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis, their ability to improve thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients is under investigation in clinical trials. In this review, we propose a treatment approach to thrombocytopenia according to our novel concept of splenic volume, and we describe the current management of thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Splenectomy for Portal Hypertension

Background. Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the gold-standard procedure for normal to moderately enlarged spleens. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension remains controversial. We carried out this systematic review to identify the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in treating portal hypertension. Data sources. A systematic search for comparative studies that compared laparoscopic splenectomy with open splenectomy for portal hypertension was carried out. Studies were independently reviewed for quality, inclusion and exclusion criteria, demographic characteristics, and perioperative outcomes. Conclusion. Although laparoscopic splenectomy is associated with longer operating time, it offers advantages over the open procedure in terms of less blood loss, lower operative complications, earlier resumption of oral intake, and shorter posthospital stay. Therefore, laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and feasible intervention for portal hypertension.

Modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection has been reported safe, feasible and minimally invasive for patients with portal hypertension. We have developed an even less invasive technique, modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection, and compared outcomes of modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in 107 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertensive bleeding and secondary hypersplenism who underwent modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (n = 37) or open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (n = 70) between January 2010 and February 2013. Their demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared.

RESULTS

Modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection was successful in all patients, with none requiring conversion to open surgery or having significant perioperative complications. Operation time was significantly longer for modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection than open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (P < 0.0001), but estimated intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0004); volume of intraoperative blood transfusion (P < 0.05); visual analog scale pain score on the first postoperative day (P < 0.0001); times to first oral intake (P < 0.0001), passage of flatus (P = 0.0004), and off-bed activity (P < 0.0001); postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.0001); postoperative days of temperature >38.0 °C (P = 0.002); white blood cell counts on postoperative days 1 (P < 0.0001) and 7 (P < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group. The percentage of patients experiencing postoperative complications was significantly lower in the modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group than in the open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group (13.5 % [5/37] vs. 35.7 % [25/70], P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The less invasive modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure for liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertensive bleeding and hypersplenism.

Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic splenectomy compared with open splenectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 30-day postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LS has generally been associated with lower rates of postoperative complications than OS. However, evidence mainly comes from small studies that failed to adjust for the confounding effects of the underlying indication or clinical condition that may have favored the use of one technique over the other.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing splenectomy in 2008 and 2009 using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (n = 1781). Retrieved data included 30-day mortality and morbidity (cardiac, respiratory, central nervous system, renal, wound, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding outcomes), demographics, indication, and preoperative risk factors. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the adjusted effect of the splenectomy technique on outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 874 (49.1%) cases had LS and 907 (50.9%) had OS. After adjusting for all potential confounders including the indication and preoperative risk factors, LS was associated with decreased 30-day mortality [OR (odds ratio): 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.84] and postoperative respiratory occurrences (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27-0.76), wound occurrences (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.11-0.79), and sepsis (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-0.89) when compared with OS. Patients who underwent LS also had a significantly shorter total length of hospital stay and were less likely to receive intraoperative transfusions compared with patients who underwent OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LS is associated with more favorable postoperative outcomes than OS, irrespective of the indication for splenectomy or the patient's clinical status.

A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders

BACKGROUND

Due to changes in surgical trends, laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomies performed for hematological disorders, barring any contraindications. The perioperative outcomes of LS for this indication have not been updated for several years. Controversy still surrounds whether LS should be performed for massive splenomegaly. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted to identify studies comparing the perioperative outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for hematological disorders. The results were pooled by using standard meta-analysis methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies with a total of 2,914 patients comparing LS to open splenectomy (OS) for hematological disorders were identified. Mortality was low in both groups. The pooled complications of the LS group were significantly fewer than those of the OS group (-0.11, p < 0.001), and the NNT was 9 (95 % confidence interval, 6-20). For massive spleens, a similar result was observed (-0.12, p = 0.009). Accessory spleen resection and blood loss also were comparable between the two approaches. Additionally, LS was associated with longer operative times (57.38 min, p < 0.00001) and shorter hospital stays (2.48 days, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

LS is preferred compared to OS, based on lower complication rates and better handling of comorbid conditions. LS is associated with shorter hospital stays but longer operative times. We conclude that LS may be considered an acceptable option even in cases of a massive spleen. To strengthen the clinical evidence, more high-quality clinical trials on different issues are necessary.

Laparoscopic splenectomy with or without devascularization of the stomach for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Open splenectomy and devascularization are effective treatments for cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia and variceal bleeding. However, it remains controversial whether laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and devascularization (LSD) can be indicated and beneficial in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of LS and LSD for patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension was undertaken to clarify controversy about their utilization in such patients.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was performed to retrieve relevant studies from PubMed and Embase.com. The literature search and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The methodology of the identified articles was poor. Six hundred and fifty-one patients, including 478 LS patients and 173 LSD patients, were involved in efficacy and safety evaluations. There was wide variability in the outcome measures between studies. There was only one death in the patients underwent LSD. Reported major complications included post-operative bleeding requiring re-surgery, pancreatic leakage and gastric perforation. Seven studies were identified with comparisons between laparoscopic and open procedures. No meta-analysis was possible because of heterogeneity between studies and lack of randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The publications reviewed revealed LS and LSD to be safe and effective in the setting of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. From the comparison articles, laparoscopic procedures appear to be superior to open procedures regarding blood loss, hospital stay, complication rate and liver function impairment. However, it is difficult to draw firm statistical conclusions due to lack of high-quality evidence.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis

PURPOSE

Although splenectomy plays an important role in the management of patients with liver cirrhosis, the optimal technique, open surgery, total laparoscopic surgery or hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), has not yet been defined. The present study evaluated the outcomes of HALS splenectomy for cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

A total of 28 consecutive patients with cirrhosis that underwent HALS splenectomy were enrolled into this study. The preoperative laboratory and morphometric data, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were reviewed from the hospital charts.

RESULTS

The postoperative platelet count was remarkably elevated in all cases. A re-operation was required in 1 patient complicated with postoperative hemorrhage. Enhanced CT on POD 7 revealed a high incidence of portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT; 22 patients, 78.6 %). PSVT was significantly associated with higher serum bilirubin, higher indocyanine green retention value at 15 min (ICG R-15), and larger splenic vein diameter.

CONCLUSION

HALS splenectomy was a very feasible and appropriate procedure for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. PSVT was a frequent complication and large splenic vein diameter, high serum bilirubin, and high ICG R-15 were found to be significant risk factors for PSVT after HALS splenectomy in cirrhotic patients.

Correlation between HCV viraemia and splenic volume in chronic HCV infected patients: an Egyptian study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

As HCV lymphotropism was ascertained, this study was carried out to verify the possible involvement of the spleen in HCV-related chronic hepatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 97 HCV infected patients attending for treatment with interferon, categorised as follows; before treatment (group I, n=49), non-responders (group II, n=18), responders (group III, n=18) and group IV (n=12) including patients with HCV RNA below detection limit after 24 weeks of treatment. A control group of healthy blood donors (n=19) was enrolled in our study. Conventional ultrasonography was carried out on all participants. Splenic volume was measured and compared between the groups, and its relationship to HCV RNA concentration was investigated.

RESULTS

It was found that the splenic volume of patients of both groups I and II is significantly greater than that of the control group (p-values : 0.004 and 0.009, respectively) and, of patients of both groups III and IV. The latter are not significantly greater than that of the control group (p-value: 0.8 and 0.6, respectively). A significant positive relationship was detected between the splenic volume and the HCV RNA concentration in group I (r=0.56, p-value=0.00) but this is insignificant in group II. There is no significant relationship between the splenic longitudinal diameter and the HCV RNA concentration in any of the studied groups.

CONCLUSION

The splenic volume positively correlated with HCV RNA concentration in HCV positive patients, but this become insignificant in non-responders to interferon therapy. The successful response to interferon therapy matches with near normal splenic volume whilst non-responders to Interferon therapy matches with increased splenic volume. The change in the viral load leads to a corresponding change in the splenic volume and does not affect the splenic longitudinal diameter.

Laparoscopic and open splenectomy for splenomegaly secondary to liver cirrhosis: an evaluation of immunity

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the perioperative inflammatory response and immunological function of patients with portal hypertension-induced splenomegaly who underwent laparoscopic (LS) or open splenectomy (OS).

METHODS

This prospective study investigated a total of 34 patients with splenomegaly due to portal hypertension who underwent either LS (n = 18) or OS (n = 16) between May 2009 and September 2010. Peripheral venous blood samples were taken from these patients prior to surgery and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. The perioperative clinical outcomes and immunological function results were analyzed and compared within each surgical group.

RESULTS

The demographics of the two groups did not differ. The patients in the LS group experienced longer operating time, less intraoperative blood loss, earlier resumption of diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Both the open and laparoscopic groups exhibited statistically significant differences in interleukin -6 and C-reactive protein levels, and total lymphocyte, CD4 T, and natural killer cell numbers on POD 1 and 3 compared with pre splenectomy. The immune responses in the LS group were significantly lower than those in the OS group. The LS group exhibited better preserved cellular immune response and faster recovery than the OS group on POD 7.

CONCLUSIONS

An examination of the inflammatory reaction and cellular immune response after LS and OS demonstrated that there are significant differences in the immune responses observed in the two groups. Further human studies are required to determine the permanent effects of LS on immune function.

The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy used for massive splenomegaly is still controversial. The purpose of our current study was to identify the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

METHODS

From January 2006 to January 2010, laparoscopic splenectomy was performed on 33 patients with massive splenomegaly in our hospital, compared with 29 patients who received open splenectomy (group 2) and 48 patients with normal-size spleens who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (group 3). Perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in group 2, the patients in group 1 required more operative time, less blood transfusion, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay; furthermore, patients in group 1 had less estimated blood loss and fewer complications. No statistically significant difference was found in the patients' spleen volume and spleen weight. Group 1 had statistically significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, spleen volume, and spleen weight compared with patients in group 3. No significant differences were found in the conversion, blood transfusion, or complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure for splenomegaly.

A retrospective cohort study of partial splenic embolization for antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C with thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Although partial splenic embolization (PSE) is reportedly effective prior to interferon (IFN)-based therapy, the number of subjects in these studies is small, and the appropriate candidates and disease prognosis remain unknown.

METHODS

PSE was performed in 30 patients with advanced hepatitis C who could not receive IFN-based therapy because of thrombocytopenia, platelet counts of ≤100,000/mm(3), and hypersplenism. Also, we compared 25 PSE-treated patients with 23 PSE-untreated patients with thrombocytopenia receiving pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN)-alpha 2b plus ribavirin over the same period.

RESULTS

PSE significantly increased platelet and leukocyte counts. PSE was well tolerated with no severe complications. All the patients could receive IFN-based therapy. Discontinuation of therapy in the total cohort of PSE-treated patients was not due to thrombocytopenia. Although PSE did not significantly increase the sustained virological response (SVR) rate, it significantly maintained higher platelet counts throughout the observation period and increased the percentage of patients with 100% adherence to PEG-IFN in the total controlled study population and in subjects with genotype 2. In PSE-treated patients with genotype 2, a trend towards increased SVR was noted. Four patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a median of 14.5 months after PSE, even though two of these patients had achieved an SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-based therapy following PSE had an advantage in the maintenance of higher platelet counts, and PSE possibly caused an increase in adherence to PEG-IFN. Although patients with genotype 2 might be better candidates for PSE, further evaluation is needed. Careful follow-up of PSE-treated patients, even though they may have achieved an SVR, is needed to detect HCC.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is an effective and safe intervention for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the standard procedure for the normal to moderately enlarged spleens. We performed this study to investigate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 24 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy (group 1), 24 cases of open splenectomy (group 2) for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis, and 68 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (group 3). We performed comparisons between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 in terms of demographic, intraoperative, postoperative variables, and changes in blood counts and liver function.

RESULTS

Patients in groups 1 and 2 had comparable demographic characteristics, but those in group 1 had less estimated blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter duration of oral intake, and they required less analgesia and shorter post-hospital stays. In both groups, leukocyte and platelet counts increased significantly and transaminase and total bilirubin decreased postoperatively, but not significantly, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with group 3, patients in group 1 were older, had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels and leukocyte counts, poorer Child-Pugh class, required more operation time, and suffered more estimated blood loss; however, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of conversion rates, transfusion rates, complication rates, and postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis.