Local ectopic implantation for salvaging an amputated thumb: an anatomical study and a case report

Salvage of Devascularized and Amputated Upper Extremity Digits with Temporary Ectopic Replantation: Our Clinical Series

BACKGROUND

One of the reasons for unsuccessful replantation is recipient site problems. In cases where proximal stump status cannot be predicted exactly, reamputation may be required depending on the result of infection and tissue necrosis. The ectopic banking method has been defined for this type of injury. In this study, we presented the amputated or devascularized upper extremity digit ectopic banking application results in our clinical practice.

METHODS

Nineteen digits (17 patients) banking ectopically were included in the study. All digits ectopically banked in the forearm volar of the non-injured upper limb. Transfers were made after waiting for the appropriate time. Ectopic banking periods, postoperative complications, and other descriptive data were recorded. In the postoperative 6th month, the range of motion (ROM) values of the digits were measured and compared with the ROM values of the same digit on the non-injured extremity.Also, in the postoperative 6th month, a questionnaire with a score of 1-5 was conducted for cosmetic results.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. The mean patient age was 39.5 years. The ectopic banking success rate is 94.1% (16/17). The orthotopic/heterotopic transfer success rate is 100% (17/17). Ectopic banking time is, on average, 19.2 days (min 5-max 55). Average cosmetic scale is 3.54.

CONCLUSIONS

We think that the results of our study will shed light on surgeons who make ectopic banking applications.

Degree of Soft Tissue Injury is a Major Determinant of Successful Arterial Repair in the Extremity: A New Classification of Extremity Arterial Injury?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate outcomes after extremity arterial injury repair and examined the association between outcomes and the degree of soft tissue injury and vascular repair methods.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 106 patients (108 cases) who underwent emergent microsurgical repair of extremity arterial injury due to trauma and non-perfusion of the affected extremity. The cases were divided into three groups by degree of associated soft tissue injuries: (A) adequate soft tissue coverage over the injured major vessels after radical debridement, (B) inadequate soft tissue coverage over the injured major vessels after radical debridement, and (C) radical debridement was not feasible due to unclear extent of injured soft tissue. Differences in vascular repair methods and outcomes among the three groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

In Group A (n = 61), microvascular suture and vessel graft achieved 95.1% and 85.0% successful limb reperfusion, respectively. In Group B (n = 31), vessel reconstruction with flap coverage achieved 100% successful reperfusion. Vessel graft achieved 28.6% successful limb reperfusion, while there were no cases of successful reperfusion using microvascular sutures. In Group C (n = 16), no vascular repair method achieved successful reperfusion. There were significant differences among the three groups in successful reperfusion (p < 0.001) and limb salvage (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The extent of associated soft tissue injury was associated with different vascular repair methods and outcomes. We propose a new system for classifying these injuries according to the degree of associated soft tissue injury.

Cross limb vessel transfer for salvage of the extremity with irreparable artery injury

PURPOSE

Complex injuries of the extremity can be very challenging to treat. In the setting of soft tissue infection and vascular defect, arterial reconstructions are at high risk of failure. Historically, there have not been good options to successfully salvage limbs with these serious injuries. We describe our experience of utilizing a cross limb vessel transfer to salvage the limb.

METHODS

Patients were identified retrospectively with complex vascular injuries of the extremity and wound infection, who were treated with a cross limb vessel transfer. Once the infection has successfully been cleared, flow-through flap transfer was performed for definitive reconstruction of the arterial injury. Data collated included patient demographics, injury and operation details, and post-operative outcomes including blood supply of the limb, wound infection and complications.

RESULTS

Between April 2014 and January 2017, 3 patients with an average age of 21 years (range, 16-29) were admitted. The median length of hospital stay was 62 days (range, 26-122). The average number of operation was 7.3 times (range, 6-10). Two patients' upper limb had survived with limited movement, relatively minor donor site morbidity and confirmed flow through the vessel reconstruction using CTA, while one patient had lower limb amputation due to severe infection and prolonged ischemia time.

CONCLUSIONS

This series of patients demonstrates that cross limb vessel transfer is an invaluable technique to salvage the limb in patients with complex vascular injury and wound infection. However, for lower limb with prolonged ischemia time and severe infection, limb salvage is not recommended.

Revascularization and Replantation in the Hand: Ectopic Banking and Replantation

Traumatic amputation of the upper extremity remains a challenging problem for reconstructive hand surgeons. Temporary ectopic banking of amputated parts for subsequent replantation is an innovative and valuable surgical technique for patients who would otherwise be poor candidates for replantation. The applications of ectopic banking have evolved and expanded to include various clinical scenarios. Although there is considerable variability within the literature, this article summarizes the optimal banking locations and duration, while also highlighting several treatment considerations when performing this technique.

Two-stage face transplantation: a new concept in vascularized composite allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Animal models and clinical cases of facial allotransplantation have been performed as a single stage procedure. A staged surgery might offer some advantages in selected cases. In this study, a two-stage face transplantation approach was performed on rat and the feasibility and safety were evaluated.

METHODS

Brown Norway rats were used as donors and Lewis rats as recipients in the allotransplantation groups. A total of 33 hemiface-scalp transplantations were performed. Syngeneic orthotopic transplantations were performed either in one-stage (one single stage surgery; N = 3), local two-stage [heterothopic transplantation to the neck during the first stage and graft rotation as a pedicled flap to cover the facial defect on postoperative day (POD) 2; N = 3], or distant two-stage approaches (heterothopic transplantation to the groin during the first stage and free graft transfer to the face on postoperative day 2; N = 3). In the allotransplantation groups using the same approaches, 12 received no treatment (N = 4 each subgroup) and 12 received the same tapering dose of cyclosporine (10 to 2 mg/Kg/day; N = 4 each subgroup). Graft survival and the rejection grades were assessed clinically and pathologically.

RESULTS

All syngeneic transplants survived for the follow-up period of 180 days. The mean rejection-free survival and total survival of the allograft in the no treatment group was 6 ± 0.3 and 14.3 ± 4.5 days in the one-stage group, 6 ± 0.4 and 18.5 ± 1 days in the local two-stage group and 6 ± 0.2 and 14.3 ± 5.7 (P > 0.05). All allografts in the treatment groups did not develop rejection during the 42 days follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible, reliable, reproducible, and safe to perform a two-stage face transplantation in rats. This novel approach has the potential to be applied in research and eventually in selected clinical cases of facial allotransplantation.