The Effect of Lidocaine Gel on Pain Perception During Diagnostic Flexible Cystoscopy in Women: A Randomized Control Trial

Pain reduction methods during transurethral cystoscopy

Transurethral cystoscopy (CS) is a common urological procedure, performed mostly for diagnostic but also for therapeutic purposes. Although CS is generally well tolerated, some patients describe the pain related to the procedure as high or even “unbearable”. As a result, many patients fear and avoid both primary and/or follow-up cystoscopies. This may lead to uncontrolled progression of neoplastic disease. Therefore, it is crucial to maximally increase the comfort of the patient and to implement safe and effective analgesia before the procedure. Providing the patients with appropriate care during CS can encourage them to comply with diagnostic schedules and improve their prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyze the available literature on various methods of pain reduction during transurethral CS. The PubMed electronic database limited to English articles published until January 2021 was used in the process. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, prospective randomized studies, multicenter comparisons, reviews and retrospective comparisons were used. As a result, 65 articles were included in this review.

Lidocaine lubricant jelly does not reduce pain perception during female urethral catheterization: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE

The use of lubrication before performing urethral catheterization has been recommended. However, the benefit of using lidocaine gel over plain lubricant gel in reducing pain perception during female urethral catheterization is unclear. With this review, we aimed to compare the pain perception during female urethral catheterization with or without lidocaine lubricant gel.

METHODS

In this study, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2% lidocaine gel and plain lubricant gel in reducing pain perception during female catheterization. Standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed while conducting this review (CRD42020207312).

RESULTS

In this review, six RCTs with 464 participants were included. The overall risk of bias for these studies was low. Pain score was presented as standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In the overall and subgroup analysis (according to types of pain scores) no significant difference was found between the use of lidocaine and plain lubricant jelly (SMD -0.24 95% CI [-0.96 0.47]). On trial sequential analysis (TSA), by setting alpha = 5% and beta = 20% for moderate evidence the information size calculated was 440 participants. The cumulative Z-score crossed the TSA line proving the reliability of the results. According to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the evidence is "moderately" certain.

CONCLUSION

The use of 2% lidocaine gel in female catheterization does not provide a significant reduction in pain perception as compared to plain lubricant gel.

Is Meatal Analgesia Necessary for Pain Reduction During Cystoscopy in Females? A Prospective Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether anesthesia of the meatal orifice reduces pain during cystoscopy in women, known to cause significant pain, discomfort and anxiety in women. Secondary end-point was to compare pain between rigid and flexible cystoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 120 women, median age 66 (interquartile range 57-69), referred for office cystoscopy were prospectively randomized into 2 groups according to meatal orifice exposure: (1) 5-minute meatus exposure with 2% lidocaine gel; (2) 5-minute meatal exposure with water soluble gel. In each group a pad soaked by the gel was externally placed on the meatal orifice. Each group was further divided to flexible or rigid cystoscopy. Exclusion criteria included urethral stricture, urinary tract infection, chronic pain disease (e.g., IC/PBS), neurogenic disorder, allergy to lubricant, and concurrent pain medication. In all patients, a water-based lubricant applied on the cystoscope, was used for lubrication. A 0-10 visual analogue scale was performed at 4 checkpoints: before examination, immediately following urethral penetration, immediately at end of procedure and 15 minutes after completion RESULTS: Study groups did not significantly differ in clinical or demographic parameters. Pain level prior to procedure was 0 in all patients. Mean visual analogue scale immediately after urethral penetration was 4.2 ± 2.3 in both groups 1 and 2 (P= 1). No significant differences in other checkpoints was reported. Further subanalysis by cystoscope type did not demonstrate significance.

CONCLUSION

Meatal analgesia does not increase tolerance to cystoscopy in females. Pain level is not reduced by the use of flexible cystoscope in the female population.