Mesenchymal stem cells reverse bone marrow dysfunction following injury and stress

Fate determination role of erythropoietin and romiplostim in the lineage commitment of hematopoietic progenitors

Erythropoietin (EPO) and thrombopoietin (TPO) have long been known to promote erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis, respectively. However, the fate changing role of EPO and TPO on megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEPs) to develop along the erythroid versus megakaryocyte (MK) lineage remains unclear. We have previously shown that EPO may have fate changing role because EPO treatment could induce progenitor cells depletion and resulted in EPO resistance. Therefore, we hypothesize that a combination of romiplostim, a TPO receptor agonist that could stimulate the expansion of progenitors, with EPO can treat EPO resistance. Using rats with anemia due to chronic kidney disease, we demonstrated that romiplostim synergized with EPO to promote red blood cells production while EPO inhibited platelet production in a dose-dependent manner to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Corroborating findings from in vivo, in vitro experiments demonstrated that romiplostim expanded hematopoietic stem cells and stimulated megakaryopoiesis, while EPO drove the progenitors toward an erythroid fate. We further developed a novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to quantify the effects of EPO and romiplostim on megakaryopoiesis and erythropoiesis simultaneously. The modeling results demonstrated that EPO increased the differentiation rate of MEPs into burst-forming unit-erythroid up to 22-fold, indicating that the slight increase of MEPs induced by romiplostim could be further amplified and recruited by EPO to promote erythropoiesis. The data herein support that romiplostim in combination with EPO can treat EPO resistance. Significance Statement This study clarified that erythropoietin (EPO) drives the fate of megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEP) toward the erythroid lineage, thus reducing their megakaryocyte (MK) lineage commitment, whereas romiplostim, a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist (RA), stimulates megakaryopoiesis through the MK-committed progenitor and MEP bifurcation pathways simultaneously. These findings support an innovative combination of romiplostim and EPO to treat EPO-resistant anemia, because the combination therapy further promotes erythropoiesis compared to EPO monotherapy and inhibit platelet production compared to romiplostim monotherapy.

Innate-Like Lymphocytes Are Immediate Participants in the Hyper-Acute Immune Response to Trauma and Hemorrhagic Shock

Adverse outcomes following severe traumatic injury are frequently attributed to a state of immunological dysfunction acquired during treatment and recovery. Recent genomic evidence however, suggests that the trajectory toward development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is already in play at admission (<2 h following injury). Improved understanding of the molecular events during the hyper-acute immunological response to trauma, <2 h following injury, may reveal opportunities to ameliorate organ injury and expedite recovery. Lymphocytes have not previously been considered key participants in this early response; however, two observations in human trauma patients namely, raised populations of circulating NKT and NK cells during the hyper-acute phase and persistent lymphopenia beyond 48 h show association with the development of MODS during recovery. These highlight the need for greater understanding of lymphocyte function in the hyper-acute phase of inflammation. An exploratory study was therefore conducted in a well-established murine model of trauma and hemorrhagic shock (T&HS) to investigate (1) the development of lymphopenia in the murine model and (2) the phenotypic and functional changes of three innate-like lymphocyte subsets, NK1.1+ CD3–, NK1.1+ CD3+, γδTCR+ CD3+ cells, focusing on the first 6 h following injury. Rapid changes in phenotype and function were demonstrated in these cells within blood and spleen, but responses in lung tissue lagged behind. This study describes the immediacy of the innate-like lymphocyte response to trauma in different body compartments and considers new lines for further investigation to develop our understanding of MODS pathogenesis.

Trauma and Stem Cells: Biology and Potential Therapeutic Implications

Trauma may cause irreversible tissue damage and loss of function despite current best practice. Healing is dependent both on the nature of the injury and the intrinsic biological capacity of those tissues for healing. Preclinical research has highlighted stem cell therapy as a potential avenue for improving outcomes for injuries with poor healing capacity. Additionally, trauma activates the immune system and alters stem cell behaviour. This paper reviews the current literature on stem cells and its relevance to trauma care. Emphasis is placed on understanding how stem cells respond to trauma and pertinent mechanisms that can be utilised to promote tissue healing. Research involving notable difficulties in trauma care such as fracture non-union, cartilage damage and trauma induced inflammation is discussed further.

Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem (Stromal) Cells: Biology and Preclinical Evidence for Therapeutic Potential for Organ Dysfunction Following Trauma or Sepsis

Several experimental studies have provided evidence that bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSC) may be effective in treating critically ill surgical patients who develop traumatic brain injury, acute renal failure, or the acute respiratory distress syndrome. There is also preclinical evidence that MSC may be effective in treating sepsis-induced organ failure, including evidence that MSC have antimicrobial properties. This review considers preclinical studies with direct relevance to organ failure following trauma, sepsis or major infections that apply to critically ill patients. Progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of benefit, including MSC release of paracrine factors, transfer of mitochondria, and elaboration of exosomes and microvesicles. Regardless of how well they are designed, preclinical studies have limitations in modeling the complexity of clinical syndromes, especially in patients who are critically ill. In order to facilitate translation of the preclinical studies of MSC to critically ill patients, there will need to be more standardization regarding MSC production with a focus on culture methods and cell characterization. Finally, well designed clinical trials will be needed in critically ill patient to assess safety and efficacy. Stem Cells 2017;35:316-324.