Use of recipient's left colic artery for arterial reconstruction during liver transplantation in Alagille syndrome with vasculopathy: a case report

Living-donor liver transplantation: Right versus left

A dilemma of graft selection between right or left livers occurs during the planning of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as well as splitting a whole liver graft into full right/full left grafts in deceased-donor liver transplantation. The right liver's relation to the whole liver could be considered as the trunk of a tree; it has a larger volume, the main axis of bile ducts, and the inferior vena cava mainly belongs to the right liver. Therefore, it was considered as the standard graft in LDLTs. Whether to procure the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with a right liver graft or to leave it attached to the left-liver remnant largely depends on the transplant institute. Recently, most transplant institutes tend to leave the MHV with the left liver for the sake of donor safety. Unlike hepatectomy for liver tumors, it is vital to preserve inflow and outflow for both the resected as well as the remaining livers. While procuring any graft type, the most important is to procure a liver graft with reconstructable portal veins, hepatic arteries, hepatic veins, and bile ducts, which should be well preoperatively planned using 3D-computed tomography with considerations given to graft volume and potential congestion areas.

Visceral artery anomalies in patients with Alagille syndrome

BACKGROUND

Intracranial and pulmonary vascular anomalies are well-known complications and causes of mortality in AGS; however, visceral artery anomalies are less commonly recognized. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of our experience with pediatric LDLT that focuses on the current problems with and treatments for visceral artery anomalies in AGS after LDLT.

METHODS

Between May 2001 and December 2017, 294 LDLTs were performed for 285 pediatric recipients. Of these, 13 LDLTs (4.4%) for 12 AGS patients were performed. We classified the visceral artery anomalies into aneurysms and stenosis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of visceral aneurysm was 2 of 12 recipients (16.7%) and included a SMA aneurysm in one patient and an IPDA aneurysm with a subsequent SPA aneurysm in one patient; the ages of the diagnosis of visceral aneurysm were 16.3, 21.1, and 21.7 y, respectively. An endovascular treatment was performed for a progressive IPDA saccular aneurysm (12.0 × 14.5 × 15.0 mm). The overall incidence of visceral artery stenosis was 7 of 12 recipients (58.3%) and the median age at the diagnosis of visceral artery stenosis was 15.5 y (range 1.7-22.9 y). All 3 AGS patients with RA stenosis suffered from renal dysfunction (eGFR of 51, 78, and 51 mL/min/1.73m² ).

CONCLUSION

The morbidity of visceral artery anomalies is not negligible. The performance of periodic imaging examinations is necessary, even for infants, because it is difficult to detect visceral vascular anomalies in the infant stage.