In vitro and in vivo proof of tolerance after two-step haploidentical bone marrow and kidney transplantation of the same donor

Hematopoietic cell-based and non-hematopoietic cell-based strategies for immune tolerance induction in living-donor renal transplantation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite its use to prevent acute rejection, lifelong immunosuppression can adversely impact long-term patient and graft outcomes. In theory, immunosuppression withdrawal is the ultimate goal of kidney transplantation, and is made possible by the induction of immunological tolerance. The purpose of this paper is to review the safety and efficacy of immune tolerance induction strategies in living-donor kidney transplantation, both chimerism-based and non-chimerism-based. The impact of these strategies on transplant outcomes, including acute rejection, allograft function and survival, cost, and immune monitoring, will also be discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as additional online resources such as EBSCO, were exhaustively searched. Adult living-donor kidney transplant recipients who developed chimerism-based tolerance after concurrent bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or those who received non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell therapy using mesenchymal stromal cells, dendritic cells, or regulatory T cells were studied between 2000 and 2021. Individual sources of evidence were evaluated critically, and the strength of evidence and risk of bias for each outcome of the transplant tolerance study were assessed.

RESULTS

From 28,173 citations, 245 studies were retrieved after suitable exclusion and duplicate removal. Of these, 22 studies (2 RCTs, 11 cohort studies, 6 case-control studies, and 3 case reports) explicitly related to both interventions (chimerism- and non-chimerism-based immune tolerance) were used in the final review process and were critically appraised. According to the findings, chimerism-based strategies fostered immunotolerance, allowing for the safe withdrawal of immunosuppressive medications. Cell-based therapy, on the other hand, frequently did not induce tolerance except for minimising immunosuppression. As a result, the rejection rates, renal allograft function, and survival rates could not be directly compared between these two groups. While chimerism-based tolerance protocols posed safety concerns due to myelosuppression, including infections and graft-versus-host disease, cell-based strategies lacked these adverse effects and were largely safe. There was a lack of direct comparisons between HLA-identical and HLA-disparate recipients, and the cost implications were not examined in several of the retrieved studies. Most studies reported successful immunosuppressive weaning lasting at least 3 years (ranging up to 11.4 years in some studies), particularly with chimerism-based therapy, while only a few investigators used immune surveillance techniques. The studies reviewed were often limited by selection, classification, ascertainment, performance, and attrition bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that chimerism-based hematopoietic strategies induce immune tolerance, and a substantial number of patients are successfully weaned off immunosuppression. Despite the risk of complications associated with myelosuppression. Non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell protocols, on the other hand, have been proven to facilitate immunosuppression minimization but seldom elicit immunological tolerance. However, the results of this review must be interpreted with caution because of the non-randomised study design, potential confounding, and small sample size of the included studies. Further validation and refinement of tolerogenic protocols in accordance with local practice preferences is also warranted, with an emphasis on patient selection, cost ramifications, and immunological surveillance based on reliable tolerance assays.

Use of Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Assay to Evaluate Immune Tolerance before Kidney Transplantation with an Immunosuppression-Free Protocol following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from the Same Donor

Several cases of kidney transplantation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from the same donor for end-stage renal disease have been reported. In those cases, immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued since immune tolerance was supposed to be induced. Theoretically, the recipient's immune system recognizes the kidney allograft as its own tissue with the same human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile, and the kidney allograft will not be rejected, even without the use of immunosuppressive agents. However, almost all recipients receive immunosuppressants in the early stages after kidney transplantation owing to concerns of acute rejection. Here, we report a successful case of post-HSCT kidney transplantation without the use of immunosuppressive drugs, in which a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay was used to evaluate immune tolerance before kidney transplantation. The patient was a 25-year-old woman. Five years prior, she developed acute myeloid leukemia and underwent HLA-half-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Thereafter, she was in remission of the acute myeloid leukemia, but 1 year later, she developed renal graft-versus-host disease. Subsequently, the patient's renal function gradually deteriorated to end-stage renal failure, and she underwent kidney transplantation with the previous stem cell donor: her mother. HLA typing of donor and recipient showed a complete chimerism in the peripheral blood. The pretransplantation complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch and flow cytometric T-cell crossmatch results were both negative, and HLA antibody measurements were all negative. The MLR assay revealed no T-lymphocyte reaction to the donor; therefore, immunosuppressants were not used. Two years after transplantation, the patient's serum creatinine concentration was around 0.8 mg/dL (down from 4 mg/dL before transplantation). No abnormalities were observed in a renal biopsy performed after 3 months. Our study, along with others, indicates that immune tolerance to a donor develops in post-HSCT kidney transplantation from the same donor.

Harnessing Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance to Improve Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review

Survival after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is limited by chronic rejection as well as the need for lifelong immunosuppression and its associated toxicities. Several preclinical and clinical studies have tested methods designed to induce transplantation tolerance without lifelong immune suppression. The limited success of these strategies has led to the development of clinical protocols that combine SOT with other approaches, such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT prior to SOT facilitates engraftment of donor cells that can drive immune tolerance. Recent innovations in graft manipulation strategies and post-HSCT immune therapy provide further advances in promoting tolerance and improving clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss conventional and unconventional immunological mechanisms underlying the development of immune tolerance in SOT recipients and how they can inform clinical advances. Specifically, we review the most recent mechanistic studies elucidating which immune regulatory cells dampen cytotoxic immune reactivity while fostering a tolerogenic environment. We further discuss how this understanding of regulatory cells can shape graft engineering and other therapeutic strategies to improve long-term outcomes for patients receiving HSCT and SOT.

The importance of MHC class II in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and chimerism-based solid organ tolerance in a rat model

Mixed hematopoietic chimerism enables donor-specific tolerance for solid organ grafts. This study evaluated the influence of different serological major histocompatibility complex disparities on chimerism development, graft-versus-host disease incidence and subsequently on solid organ tolerance in a rat model. For bone marrow transplantation conditioning total body irradiation was titrated using 10, 8 or 6 Gray. Bone marrow transplantation was performed across following major histocompatibility complex mismatched barriers: complete disparity, MHC class II, MHC class I or non-MHC mismatch. Recipients were clinically monitored for graft-versus-host disease and analyzed for chimerism using flow cytometry. After a reconstitution of 100 days, composition of peripheral leukocytes was determined. Mixed chimeras were challenged with heart grafts from allogeneic donor strains to define the impact of donor MHC class disparities on solid organ tolerance on the basis of stable chimerism. After myeloablation with 10 Gray of total body irradiation, chimerism after bone marrow transplantation was induced independent of MHC disparity. MHC class II disparity increased the incidence of graft-versus-host disease and reduced induction of stable chimerism upon myelosuppressive total body irradiation with 8 and 6 Gray, respectively. Stable mixed chimeras showed tolerance towards heart grafts from donors with MHC matched to either bone marrow donors or recipients. Isolated matching of MHC class II with bone marrow donors likewise led to stable tolerance as opposed to matching of MHC class I. In summary, MHC class II disparity was critically associated with the onset of graft-versus host disease and was identified as obstacle for successful development of chimerism after bone marrow transplantation and subsequent donor-specific solid organ tolerance.

Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donor-A multicenter analysis

Tolerance induction through simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but it is hampered by the toxicity of preconditioning therapies and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Moreover, renal function has never been compared to conventionally transplanted patients, thus, whether donor-specific tolerance results in improved outcomes remains unanswered. We collected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same donor and compared patient and transplant kidney survival as well as function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry. Overall, 22 tolerant and 20 control patients were included (median observation period 10 years [range 11 months to 26 years]). In the tolerant group, no renal allograft loss was reported, whereas 3 were lost in the control group. Median creatinine levels were 85 μmol/l (interquartile range [IQR] 72-99) in the tolerant cohort and 118 μmol/l (IQR 99-143) in the control group. Mixed linear-model showed around 29% lower average creatinine levels throughout follow-up in the tolerant group (P < .01). Our data clearly show stable renal graft function without long-term immunosuppression for many years, suggesting permanent donor-specific tolerance. Thus sequential transplantation might be an alternative approach for future studies targeting tolerance induction in renal allograft recipients.

Kidney Transplantation With Corticosteroids Alone After Haploidentical HSCT From The Same Donor

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can lead to donor-specific tolerance. Patients reported in the literature that underwent kidney transplantation (KT) after a previous HSCT from the same haploidentical donor typically received short-term immunosuppression, mainly for safety reasons and concerns of triggering graft-versus-host disease.

METHODS

We describe the case of a 22-year-old patient who developed chronic kidney failure after receiving haploidentical HSCT from his father for the treatment of metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Five years after HSCT, he received a preemptive kidney transplant from his father. Steroid treatment, which had been prescribed for the underlying kidney disease, was withdrawn within 2 months posttransplant, and no de novo immunosuppression was given. Donor-specific tolerance was assessed with mixed lymphocyte reaction and INF-γ ELISPOT before (D0) and after KT (D9). Furthermore, the exact level of donor-derived T cells was measured with real-time polymerase chain reaction before and 1 year after KT.

RESULTS

In vitro assays (mixed lymphocyte reaction and ELISPOT) revealed donor-specific tolerance before and after transplantation, respectively. The number of recipient-derived T cells was low before KT and virtually did not change over time (0.0139% ± 0.0039 and 0.0120% ± 0.0067; P = NS). Graft function was excellent throughout the follow-up (36 months post KT: serum creatinine, 1.18 mg/dL). Protocol biopsies performed 1 and 12 months after transplantation confirmed the absence of rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first cases of kidney transplantation from the same donor after previous haploidentical HSCT with a corticosteroid taper alone. Our results suggest that immunosuppression can be avoided in such cases.