Cyclophosphamide for Refractory Acute Cellular Rejection After Lung Transplantation

Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection After Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lung Transplant Recipients

BackgroundNeutropenia is a common complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Filgrastim may be used to treat neutropenia in LTRs, but its consequences on acute cellular rejection (ACR) remain controversial. Objective: The purpose was to examine the association between filgrastim and incidence of ACR 6 months after filgrastim administration in LTRs. Secondary outcomes included burden of ACR, infections, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival. Methods: This was a matched cohort study of patients transplanted between January 2010 and October 2019. LTRs who received filgrastim for neutropenia were compared to a cohort who did not. LTRs were matched on transplant indication, sex, age, and time post-transplant and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of ACR. Results: 212 patients were included in the analysis (106 in each group). 50 patients (47.2%) in the filgrastim group experienced ACR compared to 37 patients (34.9%) in the no filgrastim group (P = .070). In multivariable analysis, filgrastim use was not associated with ACR at 6 months (OR 1.409, 95% CI 0.772-2.571). Time to first ACR was shorter (P = .049) and 6-month ACR score was higher in the filgrastim group (.49 vs .33, P = .047). LTRs in the filgrastim group had higher incidence of bacterial pneumonia and 1-year mortality. Conclusions: Although not associated with increased likelihood of ACR at 6 months, our study found that filgrastim is associated with increased ACR burden and decreased time to ACR. This study can help inform clinicians of ACR risk after filgrastim use in LTRs.

Boosting regulatory T cell-dependent immune tolerance by activation of p53

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have critical roles in maintaining immune hemostasis and have important anti-inflammatory functions in diseases. Recently, we identified that CX-5461 (a selective RNA polymerase I inhibitor and p53 activator) acted as a potent immunosuppressive agent, which prevented allogeneic acute rejection in animal models via a molecular mechanism distinct from all those of conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Unexpectedly, we discovered that CX-5461 could promote Treg differentiation. In this review, we have summarized the evidence for a potential role of p53 in mediating Treg differentiation and its possible mechanisms, including regulation of FoxP3 transcription, regulation of the expression of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), as well as protein-protein interaction with the transcription factor STAT5 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 5). Evidence also suggests that pharmacological p53 activators may potentially be used to boost Treg-mediated immune tolerance. Based on these data, we argue that novel p53 activators such as CX-5461 may represent a distinct class of immunosuppressants that repress conventional T cell-mediated alloimmunity with concomitant boosting of Treg-dependent immune tolerance.

Surveillance for acute cellular rejection after lung transplantation

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a common complication following lung transplantation (LTx), affecting almost a third of recipients in the first year. Established, comprehensive diagnostic criteria exist but they necessitate allograft biopsies which in turn increases clinical risk and can pose certain logistical and economic problems in service delivery. Undermining these challenges further, are known problems with inter-observer interpretation of biopsies and uncertainty as to the long-term implications of milder or indeed asymptomatic episodes. Increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has long been considered the most significant consequence of ACR. Consensus is lacking as to whether this applies to mild ACR, with contradictory evidence available. Given these issues, research into alternative, minimal or non-invasive biomarkers represents the main focus of research in ACR. A number of potential markers have been proposed, but none to date have demonstrated adequate sensitivity and specificity to allow translation from bench to bedside.