1
|
Fonseca N, Bowerman J, Askari P, Proskovec AL, Feltrin FS, Veltkamp D, Early H, Wagner BC, Davenport EM, Maldjian JA. Magnetoencephalography Atlas Viewer for Dipole Localization and Viewing. J Imaging 2024; 10:80. [PMID: 38667978 PMCID: PMC11051542 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10040080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a noninvasive neuroimaging technique widely recognized for epilepsy and tumor mapping. MEG clinical reporting requires a multidisciplinary team, including expert input regarding each dipole's anatomic localization. Here, we introduce a novel tool, the "Magnetoencephalography Atlas Viewer" (MAV), which streamlines this anatomical analysis. The MAV normalizes the patient's Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, reverse-normalizes MNI atlases to the native MRI, identifies MEG dipole files, and matches dipoles' coordinates to their spatial location in atlas files. It offers a user-friendly and interactive graphical user interface (GUI) for displaying individual dipoles, groups, coordinates, anatomical labels, and a tri-planar MRI view of the patient with dipole overlays. It evaluated over 273 dipoles obtained in clinical epilepsy subjects. Consensus-based ground truth was established by three neuroradiologists, with a minimum agreement threshold of two. The concordance between the ground truth and MAV labeling ranged from 79% to 84%, depending on the normalization method. Higher concordance rates were observed in subjects with minimal or no structural abnormalities on the MRI, ranging from 80% to 90%. The MAV provides a straightforward MEG dipole anatomic localization method, allowing a nonspecialist to prepopulate a report, thereby facilitating and reducing the time of clinical reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N.C.d. Fonseca
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Jason Bowerman
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Pegah Askari
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Amy L. Proskovec
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Fabricio Stewan Feltrin
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Daniel Veltkamp
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Heather Early
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ben C. Wagner
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Davenport
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Joseph A. Maldjian
- MEG Center of Excellence, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (P.A.); (A.L.P.); (F.S.F.); (D.V.); (H.E.); (E.M.D.); (J.A.M.)
- Advanced Neuroscience Imaging Research (ANSIR) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (J.B.); (B.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Safar K, Vandewouw MM, Sato J, Devasagayam J, Hill RM, Rea M, Brookes MJ, Taylor MJ. Using optically pumped magnetometers to replicate task-related responses in next generation magnetoencephalography. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6513. [PMID: 38499615 PMCID: PMC10948796 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) offer a new wearable means to measure magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals, with many advantages compared to conventional systems. However, OPMs are an emerging technology, thus characterizing and replicating MEG recordings is essential. Using OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG, this study investigated evoked responses, oscillatory power, and functional connectivity during emotion processing in 20 adults, to establish replicability across the two technologies. Five participants with dental fixtures were included to assess the validity of OPM-MEG recordings in those with irremovable metal. Replicable task-related evoked responses were observed in both modalities. Similar patterns of oscillatory power to faces were observed in both systems. Increased connectivity was found in SQUID-versus OPM-MEG in an occipital and parietal anchored network. Notably, high quality OPM-MEG data were retained in participants with metallic fixtures, from whom no useable data were collected using conventional MEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Safar
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Marlee M Vandewouw
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Autism Research Centre, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julie Sato
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jasen Devasagayam
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ryan M Hill
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, UK
| | - Molly Rea
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Brookes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, UK
| | - Margot J Taylor
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schofield H, Hill RM, Feys O, Holmes N, Osborne J, Doyle C, Bobela D, Corvilian P, Wens V, Rier L, Bowtell R, Ferez M, Mullinger KJ, Coleman S, Rhodes N, Rea M, Tanner Z, Boto E, de Tiège X, Shah V, Brookes MJ. A Novel, Robust, and Portable Platform for Magnetoencephalography using Optically Pumped Magnetometers. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.06.583313. [PMID: 38558964 PMCID: PMC10979878 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.06.583313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures brain function via assessment of magnetic fields generated by neural currents. Conventional MEG uses superconducting sensors, which place significant limitations on performance, practicality, and deployment; however, the field has been revolutionised in recent years by the introduction of optically-pumped-magnetometers (OPMs). OPMs enable measurement of the MEG signal without cryogenics, and consequently the conception of 'OPM-MEG' systems which ostensibly allow increased sensitivity and resolution, lifespan compliance, free subject movement, and lower cost. However, OPM-MEG remains in its infancy with limitations on both sensor and system design. Here, we report a new OPM-MEG design with miniaturised and integrated electronic control, a high level of portability, and improved sensor dynamic range (arguably the biggest limitation of existing instrumentation). We show that this system produces equivalent measures when compared to an established instrument; specifically, when measuring task-induced beta-band, gamma-band and evoked neuro-electrical responses, source localisations from the two systems were highly comparable and temporal correlation was >0.7 at the individual level and >0.9 for groups. Using an electromagnetic phantom, we demonstrate improved dynamic range by running the system in background fields up to 8 nT. We show that the system is effective in gathering data during free movement (including a sitting-to-standing paradigm) and that it is compatible with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG - the clinical standard). Finally, we demonstrate portability by moving the system between two laboratories. Overall, our new system is shown to be a significant step forward for OPM-MEG technology and offers an attractive platform for next generation functional medical imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Schofield
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ryan M. Hill
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - Odile Feys
- Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Université libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Department of neurology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Niall Holmes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Osborne
- QuSpin Inc. 331 South 104 Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA
| | - Cody Doyle
- QuSpin Inc. 331 South 104 Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA
| | - David Bobela
- QuSpin Inc. 331 South 104 Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA
| | - Pierre Corvilian
- Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Wens
- Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Université libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Department of translational neuroimaging, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lukas Rier
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Richard Bowtell
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Maxime Ferez
- Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karen J. Mullinger
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Sebastian Coleman
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Natalie Rhodes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Molly Rea
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zoe Tanner
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - Elena Boto
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| | - Xavier de Tiège
- Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Université libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Department of translational neuroimaging, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vishal Shah
- QuSpin Inc. 331 South 104 Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado, 80027, USA
| | - Matthew J. Brookes
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Cerca Magnetics Limited, 2 Castlebridge Office Village, Kirtley Drive, Nottingham, NG7 1LD, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stoub TR, Stein MA, Bermeo-Ovalle A. Setting up EEG Source Imaging in Practice. J Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 41:50-55. [PMID: 38181387 DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000001050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Adding EEG source imaging to a clinical practice has clear advantages over visual inspection of EEG. This article offers insight on incorporating EEG source imaging into an EEG laboratory and the best practices for producing optimal source analysis results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis R Stoub
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Michael A Stein
- Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A
| | - Adriana Bermeo-Ovalle
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuesta P, Bruña R, Shah E, Laohathai C, Garcia-Tarodo S, Funke M, Von Allmen G, Maestú F. An individual data-driven virtual resection model based on epileptic network dynamics in children with intractable epilepsy: a magnetoencephalography interictal activity application. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad168. [PMID: 37274829 PMCID: PMC10236945 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery continues to be a recommended treatment for intractable (medication-resistant) epilepsy; however, 30-70% of epilepsy surgery patients can continue to have seizures. Surgical failures are often associated with incomplete resection or inaccurate localization of the epileptogenic zone. This retrospective study aims to improve surgical outcome through in silico testing of surgical hypotheses through a personalized computational neurosurgery model created from individualized patient's magnetoencephalography recording and MRI. The framework assesses the extent of the epileptic network and evaluates underlying spike dynamics, resulting in identification of one single brain volume as a candidate for resection. Dynamic-locked networks were utilized for virtual cortical resection. This in silico protocol was tested in a cohort of 24 paediatric patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery. Of 24 patients who were included in the analysis, 79% (19 of 24) of the models agreed with the patient's clinical surgery outcome and 21% (5 of 24) were considered as model failures (accuracy 0.79, sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.82). Patients with unsuccessful surgery outcome typically showed a model cluster outside of the resected cavity, while those with successful surgery showed the cluster model within the cavity. Two of the model failures showed the cluster in the vicinity of the resected tissue and either a functional disconnection or lack of precision of the magnetoencephalography-MRI overlapping could explain the results. Two other cases were seizure free for 1 year but developed late recurrence. This is the first study that provides in silico personalized protocol for epilepsy surgery planning using magnetoencephalography spike network analysis. This model could provide complementary information to the traditional pre-surgical assessment methods and increase the proportion of patients achieving seizure-free outcome from surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cuesta
- Correspondence to: Pablo Cuesta Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n. Ciudad Universitaria 28040 Madrid, Spain E-mail:
| | - Ricardo Bruña
- Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Ekta Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Stephanie Garcia-Tarodo
- Département de la femme, de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Hôpital des Enfants - Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland
| | - Michael Funke
- Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gretchen Von Allmen
- Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fernando Maestú
- Center for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, 28040, Spain
- Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Horn JD. Editorial: What the New White House Rules on Equitable Access Mean for the Neurosciences. Neuroinformatics 2023; 21:1-4. [PMID: 36567364 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09618-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Darrell Van Horn
- Professor of Psychology and Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mercier MR, Dubarry AS, Tadel F, Avanzini P, Axmacher N, Cellier D, Vecchio MD, Hamilton LS, Hermes D, Kahana MJ, Knight RT, Llorens A, Megevand P, Melloni L, Miller KJ, Piai V, Puce A, Ramsey NF, Schwiedrzik CM, Smith SE, Stolk A, Swann NC, Vansteensel MJ, Voytek B, Wang L, Lachaux JP, Oostenveld R. Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices. Neuroimage 2022; 260:119438. [PMID: 35792291 PMCID: PMC10190110 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the second-half of the twentieth century, intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), including both electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG), has provided an intimate view into the human brain. At the interface between fundamental research and the clinic, iEEG provides both high temporal resolution and high spatial specificity but comes with constraints, such as the individual's tailored sparsity of electrode sampling. Over the years, researchers in neuroscience developed their practices to make the most of the iEEG approach. Here we offer a critical review of iEEG research practices in a didactic framework for newcomers, as well addressing issues encountered by proficient researchers. The scope is threefold: (i) review common practices in iEEG research, (ii) suggest potential guidelines for working with iEEG data and answer frequently asked questions based on the most widespread practices, and (iii) based on current neurophysiological knowledge and methodologies, pave the way to good practice standards in iEEG research. The organization of this paper follows the steps of iEEG data processing. The first section contextualizes iEEG data collection. The second section focuses on localization of intracranial electrodes. The third section highlights the main pre-processing steps. The fourth section presents iEEG signal analysis methods. The fifth section discusses statistical approaches. The sixth section draws some unique perspectives on iEEG research. Finally, to ensure a consistent nomenclature throughout the manuscript and to align with other guidelines, e.g., Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and the OHBM Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing (COBIDAS), we provide a glossary to disambiguate terms related to iEEG research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel R Mercier
- INSERM, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
| | | | - François Tadel
- Signal & Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA United States of America
| | - Pietro Avanzini
- Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy
| | - Nikolai Axmacher
- Department of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Outer St, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Dillan Cellier
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America
| | - Maria Del Vecchio
- Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy
| | - Liberty S Hamilton
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America; Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America
| | - Dora Hermes
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Michael J Kahana
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Robert T Knight
- Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America
| | - Anais Llorens
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
| | - Pierre Megevand
- Department of Clinical neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lucia Melloni
- Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany; Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 145 East 32nd Street, Room 828, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
| | - Kai J Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Vitória Piai
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Donders Centre for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Aina Puce
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Caspar M Schwiedrzik
- Neural Circuits and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen - A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max Planck Society, Göttingen, Germany; Perception and Plasticity Group, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sydney E Smith
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America
| | - Arjen Stolk
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America
| | - Nicole C Swann
- University of Oregon in the Department of Human Physiology, United States of America
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bradley Voytek
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America; Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America; Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America; Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America
| | - Liang Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jean-Philippe Lachaux
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, EDUWELL Team, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon F-69000, France
| | - Robert Oostenveld
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Niso G, Krol LR, Combrisson E, Dubarry AS, Elliott MA, François C, Héjja-Brichard Y, Herbst SK, Jerbi K, Kovic V, Lehongre K, Luck SJ, Mercier M, Mosher JC, Pavlov YG, Puce A, Schettino A, Schön D, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Somon B, Šoškić A, Styles SJ, Tibon R, Vilas MG, van Vliet M, Chaumon M. Good scientific practice in EEG and MEG research: Progress and perspectives. Neuroimage 2022; 257:119056. [PMID: 35283287 PMCID: PMC11236277 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Good scientific practice (GSP) refers to both explicit and implicit rules, recommendations, and guidelines that help scientists to produce work that is of the highest quality at any given time, and to efficiently share that work with the community for further scrutiny or utilization. For experimental research using magneto- and electroencephalography (MEEG), GSP includes specific standards and guidelines for technical competence, which are periodically updated and adapted to new findings. However, GSP also needs to be regularly revisited in a broader light. At the LiveMEEG 2020 conference, a reflection on GSP was fostered that included explicitly documented guidelines and technical advances, but also emphasized intangible GSP: a general awareness of personal, organizational, and societal realities and how they can influence MEEG research. This article provides an extensive report on most of the LiveMEEG contributions and new literature, with the additional aim to synthesize ongoing cultural changes in GSP. It first covers GSP with respect to cognitive biases and logical fallacies, pre-registration as a tool to avoid those and other early pitfalls, and a number of resources to enable collaborative and reproducible research as a general approach to minimize misconceptions. Second, it covers GSP with respect to data acquisition, analysis, reporting, and sharing, including new tools and frameworks to support collaborative work. Finally, GSP is considered in light of ethical implications of MEEG research and the resulting responsibility that scientists have to engage with societal challenges. Considering among other things the benefits of peer review and open access at all stages, the need to coordinate larger international projects, the complexity of MEEG subject matter, and today's prioritization of fairness, privacy, and the environment, we find that current GSP tends to favor collective and cooperative work, for both scientific and for societal reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guiomar Niso
- Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Universidad Politecnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laurens R Krol
- Neuroadaptive Human-Computer Interaction, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Etienne Combrisson
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, France
| | | | | | | | - Yseult Héjja-Brichard
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie K Herbst
- Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, CNRS, NeuroSpin center, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France
| | - Karim Jerbi
- Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Canada
| | - Vanja Kovic
- Faculty of Philosophy, Laboratory for neurocognition and applied cognition, University of Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Katia Lehongre
- Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre MEG-EEG, Centre de NeuroImagerie Recherche (CENIR), Paris, France
| | - Steven J Luck
- Center for Mind & Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Manuel Mercier
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | - John C Mosher
- McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuri G Pavlov
- University of Tuebingen, Germany; Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Aina Puce
- Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Antonio Schettino
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherland; Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE), Sweden
| | - Daniele Schön
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Anđela Šoškić
- Faculty of Philosophy, Laboratory for neurocognition and applied cognition, University of Belgrade, Serbia; Teacher Education Faculty, University of Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Suzy J Styles
- Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore
| | - Roni Tibon
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martina G Vilas
- Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Maximilien Chaumon
- Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre MEG-EEG, Centre de NeuroImagerie Recherche (CENIR), Paris, France..
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
HEGAZY M, GAVVALA J. Magnetoencephalography in clinical practice. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:523-529. [DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2021-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiological technique that measures the magnetic fields associated with neuronal activity in the brain. It is closely related but distinct from its counterpart electroencephalography (EEG). The first MEG was recorded more than 50 years ago and has technologically evolved over this time. It is now well established in clinical practice particularly in the field of epilepsy surgery and functional brain mapping. However, underutilization and misunderstanding of the clinical applications of MEG is a challenge to more widespread use of this technology. A fundamental understanding of the neurophysiology and physics of MEG is discussed in this article as well as practical issues related to implementation, analysis, and clinical applications. The future of MEG and some potential clinical applications are briefly reviewed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fujiwara H, Olbrecht V, Tenney J. MEG Pharmacology: Sedation and Optimal MEG Acquisition. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 138:143-147. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
11
|
Laohathai C, Ebersole JS, Mosher JC, Bagić AI, Sumida A, Von Allmen G, Funke ME. Practical Fundamentals of Clinical MEG Interpretation in Epilepsy. Front Neurol 2021; 12:722986. [PMID: 34721261 PMCID: PMC8551575 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.722986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiologic test that offers a functional localization of epileptic sources in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. The understanding of clinical MEG concepts, and the interpretation of these clinical studies, are very involving processes that demand both clinical and procedural expertise. One of the major obstacles in acquiring necessary proficiency is the scarcity of fundamental clinical literature. To fill this knowledge gap, this review aims to explain the basic practical concepts of clinical MEG relevant to epilepsy with an emphasis on single equivalent dipole (sECD), which is one the most clinically validated and ubiquitously used source localization method, and illustrate and explain the regional topology and source dynamics relevant for clinical interpretation of MEG-EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Laohathai
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Neurology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - John S. Ebersole
- Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Atlantic Health Neuroscience Institute, Summit, NJ, United States
| | - John C. Mosher
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anto I. Bagić
- University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (UPCEC), Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA, United States
| | - Ai Sumida
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gretchen Von Allmen
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael E. Funke
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Watkins MW, Shah EG, Funke ME, Garcia-Tarodo S, Shah MN, Tandon N, Maestu F, Laohathai C, Sandberg DI, Lankford J, Thompson S, Mosher J, Von Allmen G. Indications for Inpatient Magnetoencephalography in Children - An Institution's Experience. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:667777. [PMID: 34149382 PMCID: PMC8213217 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.667777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is recognized as a valuable non-invasive clinical method for localization of the epileptogenic zone and critical functional areas, as part of a pre-surgical evaluation for patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. MEG is also useful in localizing functional areas as part of pre-surgical planning for tumor resection. MEG is usually performed in an outpatient setting, as one part of an evaluation that can include a variety of other testing modalities including 3-Tesla MRI and inpatient video-electroencephalography monitoring. In some clinical circumstances, however, completion of the MEG as an inpatient can provide crucial ictal or interictal localization data during an ongoing inpatient evaluation, in order to expedite medical or surgical planning. Despite well-established clinical indications for performing MEG in general, there are no current reports that discuss indications or considerations for completion of MEG on an inpatient basis. We conducted a retrospective institutional review of all pediatric MEGs performed between January 2012 and December 2020, and identified 34 cases where MEG was completed as an inpatient. We then reviewed all relevant medical records to determine clinical history, all associated diagnostic procedures, and subsequent treatment plans including epilepsy surgery and post-surgical outcomes. In doing so, we were able to identify five indications for completing the MEG on an inpatient basis: (1) super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), (2) intractable epilepsy with frequent electroclinical seizures, and/or frequent or repeated episodes of status epilepticus, (3) intractable epilepsy with infrequent epileptiform discharges on EEG or outpatient MEG, or other special circumstances necessitating inpatient monitoring for successful and safe MEG data acquisition, (4) MEG mapping of eloquent cortex or interictal spike localization in the setting of tumor resection or other urgent neurosurgical intervention, and (5) international or long-distance patients, where outpatient MEG is not possible or practical. MEG contributed to surgical decision-making in the majority of our cases (32 of 34). Our clinical experience suggests that MEG should be considered on an inpatient basis in certain clinical circumstances, where MEG data can provide essential information regarding the localization of epileptogenic activity or eloquent cortex, and be used to develop a treatment plan for surgical management of children with complicated or intractable epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Watkins
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ekta G Shah
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael E Funke
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephanie Garcia-Tarodo
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Pediatric Neurology Unit, Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Manish N Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Fernando Maestu
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Complutense and Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Experimental Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christopher Laohathai
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David I Sandberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jeremy Lankford
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephen Thompson
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - John Mosher
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gretchen Von Allmen
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|