Effects of surrounding frames and inner targeted line segments on event-related potentials in geometric-optical illusions

Effects of motion type on motion-onset and steady-state visual evoked potentials: rotation vs. flicker

The underlying mechanisms of information processing for two basic motion types, rotation and flicker, are not fully understood. Rotational and flickering animations at four speeds - 7 frames per second (fps), 8 fps, 11 fps, and 12 fps, respectively - are presented as visual stimuli. The motion-onset visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and steady-state VEPs (SSVEP) elicited by these motion stimuli were compared between the rotation and flicker motion types at time windows of 0-500 ms and 1000-5000 ms post-stimulus, respectively. The standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) source localization was investigated as well. Four motion speeds had no effect on the whole VEP waveform in either the rotation or the flicker groups. Significant differences in motion-onset VEPs and sLORETA source localization were found between the rotation and the flicker motion types at time windows of 200-500 ms post-stimulus. For the time windows of 1000-5000 ms post-stimulus, both the rotation and flicker groups all demonstrated the characteristics of SSVEP, with the peak spectral topographies showing at the four different frequencies, which correspond to the four motion speeds. Additionally, a higher power of spectral topography at each of the four motion speeds was found in the rotation relative to the flicker stimulation. The perceptual and cognitive processes are distinct for two types of motion: rotation and flicker. In terms of motion-onset VEPs and the characteristics of SSVEP, rotating visual stimulation is superior to flicker stimulation and may be more appropriate for clinical and engineering applications.