Maximizing clozapine utilization while minimizing blood dyscrasias: evaluation of patient demographics and severity of events

Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis: A Systematic Review. Is It Really So Frighteningly Common?

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a very effective therapeutic option for schizophrenic disorders that have been refractory to most other therapies. This extremely positive aspect clashes easily with an adverse effect of the drug that is deemed to be a very dangerous one: agranulocytosis. We asked whether the mandatory strict hematological follow-up prescribed in the black box warning of clozapine's label is proportioned to the actual incidence of agranulocytosis, considering that is the main reason that such a drug is often used only late in the treatment course.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of reports examining clozapine administration and agranulocytosis incidence. We specifically selected those where mild and moderate neutropenia was not used as a trigger to stop administration of clozapine, to better estimate the sheer incidence of agranulocytosis when clozapine was continued even with mild hematological effect, where detected. We used PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases to identify clinical studies conducted between January 1975 and April 2023.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies, mostly retrospective ones, that examined the incidence of hematological adverse effects in patients using clozapine. A total of 2354 subjects were included. The mean age of the subjects was 33.5 years. The mean duration of observation of subjects who took clozapine was 800 days, with a mean daily dose of 319.5 mg per day. Of the 2354 subjects examined, we found that 11 of them experienced agranulocytosis (0.47%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the evidence of a lower incidence of agranulocytosis than previously estimated and are in line with more recent meta-analyses. We may therefore think that clinical practice may demand a revision of the approach that both psychiatrists and supervising organizations often take when talking about clozapine.

[Safety aspects during treatment with clozapine: : Adverse effects, titration, and therapeutic drug monitoring - a narrative review]

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, clozapine should be used as a third step in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In everyday clinical practice, however, it is frequently used at a much later stage, which leads to a significant deterioration of prognosis. The first part of this narrative overview focuses on the most frequent side effects of clozapine, on the relevance of slow titration, and on specific aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline, the Guideline for the use of clozapine 2013 of the Netherlands Clozapine Collaboration Group, and the S3 Guideline for Schizophrenia of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics were searched for relevant literature, the last query dating from April 28th, 2023.

RESULTS

Despite its unique efficacy clozapine is underused in clinical practice and prescription varies between and within countries. Next to hematological, metabolic, and vegetative side effects, clozapine induced inflammation manifesting in the form of pneumonia or myocarditis, which is mainly associated with rapid titration, represents a major clinical challenge with CRP monitoring being of particular relevance. In this context, it also has to be noted that sex, smoking behavior, and ethnic origin impact clozapine metabolism, thus requiring personalized dosing.

CONCLUSION

Slow titration when possible, TDM, and CYP diagnostics when appropriate increase patient safety during treatment with clozapine and thus the likelihood of early prescription of this compound in TRS.

Socio demographic, clinical, and side effect profile of patients on clozapine in Kashmir, North India

Background

Clozapine is an atypical second-generation antipsychotic belonging to the family of dibenzodiazepines. There is lack of literature on clozapine from this part of the world. So, our aim was to study the socio demographic, clinical and side effect profile of patients on clozapine in Kashmir.

Results

The mean age of the study group was 32.6 ± 8.9 years with majority being males (78.4%), unmarried (78.4%), unemployed (77.2%), and belonging to nuclear families (77.2%). Almost half of them resided in urban localities (51.1%) and studied upto middle school (55.7%). Around three- fourth (75%) of the patients had diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The mean dose of clozapine was 338.92 ± 158.11 mgs. Sedation (76.1%), hypersalivation (69.5%), constipation (46.6%), and weight gain (34.1%) were most common side effects noted in patients. 4.5% cases developed seizures while on clozapine. 2.3% patients developed agranulocytosis while 4.5% patients developed neutropenia on clozapine. The neutropenia was more pronounced in patients of schizophrenia with suicidal tendencies with doses of more than 400 mg.

Conclusions

We have used clozapine in a wide range of indications. Our patients seem to tolerate and respond to higher doses of clozapine and the prevalence of blood dyscrasias in our study sample was much higher than the rest of India.

Clozapine-Associated Leukopenia and Agranulocytosis in Western Cape, South Africa: A 3-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine may cause life-threatening hematological side effects (HSEs). Hematological side effect incidence data from Sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Furthermore, clozapine reduces cellular immunity, and it is unknown whether clozapine is a risk factor for tuberculosis or whether HIV is a risk factor for developing HSEs. We assessed the incidence of HSEs in South Africans from the Western Cape Province on clozapine, and the secondary objective was to determine the association of HIV and tuberculosis with clozapine exposure.

METHODS

We conducted a 24-week retrospective descriptive study of patients initiated on clozapine between January 2015 and December 2017 using anonymized data from the Provincial Health Data Centre. A control group of patients initiated on risperidone was selected.

RESULTS

We identified 23,328 patients and included 5213 who had white blood cell monitoring (n = 1047 clozapine, n = 4166 risperidone). The incidence of leukopenia in patients on clozapine was 0.38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01%-0.76%) measured over a 24-week period and was 0.41% in patients on risperidone (95% CI, 0.21%-0.6%) (P = 0.91). The incidence of agranulocytosis in patients on clozapine was 0.19% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.46%) measured over a 24-week period and was 0.24% in patients on risperidone (95% CI, 0.09%-0.39%) (P = 0.266). HIV-infected patients had a 7.46 times increased risk of developing leukopenia (95% CI, 3.37-16.48; P < 0.01). Patients who developed leukopenia had a 6.24 times increased risk of contracting tuberculosis (95% CI, 1.84-21.11; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our incidence of clozapine-induced HSEs was lower than previously reported and not significantly different compared with risperidone. HIV infection was associated with HSEs. Patients with HSEs had an increased risk of developing tuberculosis.

Metabolic predictors for mortality among patients treated with long-term clozapine - A longitudinal study

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic compound indicated for refractory-schizophrenia. However, it is associated with emergent metabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular risk which may lead to mortality. In this study we aimed to explore predictors for mortality in a large cohort of schizophrenia patients treated with long-term clozapine, using the electronic medical records of the largest health care provider in Israel. Among 27,929 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, 1817 were prescribed clozapine during the years 2012-2014. We compared patients who survived (n=1705) and patients who died (n=112) during the 3-year follow-up period. Socio-demographic background, cardiovascular morbidity, medication prescriptions and health-care utilization were compared between groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of variables with survival. Chronic hypertension was found to be the only metabolic factor associated with significant hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (HR: 1.55 95% CI: 1.03-2.34). Moreover, those who died had more prevalent ischemic heart disease (14% vs 3%, p<0.005) as well as more frequent hospitalizations (0.01±0.02 vs 0.11±0.18 average per month, p<0.005), for longer periods (2.22±9.87 vs 20.38±33.76 days per month, p<0.005). Among those who died, less patients received prescriptions of statins for hyperlipidemia (13.7% vs. 52.9% in survivors, p<0.005) and hypoglycemics for diabetes mellitus (16.3% vs. 67.1% in survivors, p<0.005). Inadequate treatment of metabolic syndrome, under chronic clozapine treatment, was found to be an independent predictor for mortality. Adequate rigorous regimen for diagnosis and treatment of metabolic risk factors, especially hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus, might lower complications rate and prolong life expectancy among this population.

Exploring Biologic Predictors Response Disparities to Atypical Antipsychotics among Blacks: A Quasi-Systematic Review

Purpose

Management of schizophrenia among Blacks in the United States is affected by persistent disparities. This review explored response to atypical antipsychotics among Blacks compared with other groups to assess systematic variation that may contribute to disparities.

Methods

We conducted a quasi-systematic review of studies reporting response to atypical antipsychotics among Blacks compared with other groups, including effects of genetic variation.

Results

Of 48 identified research articles, 29 assessed differences in outcomes without inclusion of genetic variation and 20 explored effects of genetic variation; of note: one article included both types of data. Analysis of the 29 papers with clinical outcomes only suggests that while data on efficacy and risk of movement disorders were heterogeneous, findings indicate increased risk of metabolic effects and neutropenia among Blacks. Of the 20 articles exploring effects of genetic variation, allelic or genotypic variations involving several genes were associated with altered efficacy or safety among Blacks but not Whites, including risk of decreased response involving variation in DRD4 and DRD1, and improved efficacy associated with variants in DRD2, COMT, and RGS4. Others showed significant improvement in treatment response only among Whites, including variation in DTNBP1, DRD4, and GNB3.

Conclusions

The current analysis can help tailor management among Blacks using an atypical antipsychotic. Heterogeneity in genetic variation effects and response allele frequency suggests that pharmacogenetics approaches for atypical antipsychotics will need to explicitly incorporate race and ethnicity.

A systematic review of sex-based differences in effectiveness and adverse effects of clozapine

Clozapine is one of the most widely used antipsychotics for treating psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. This drug, however, is associated with adverse effects such as weight gain, metabolic syndrome, and blood dyscrasias. The manifestations of mental illness may differ between men and women. Yet, there is little evidence on the influence of sex on treatment response or the occurrence of AEs. To fill this gap of knowledge, we carried out a systematic review of the literature on sex differences in the effectiveness and adverse effects of clozapine. Scant evidence has been published on differences in effectiveness of clozapine between men and women. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, this issue has only been addressed in a published study. Regarding adverse effects, males have been reported to be more likely to develop metabolic abnormalities such as cholesterol or triglycerides, hypertension, and cardiovascular risk, while females are at a higher risk for gaining weight, developing diabetes, and needing laxatives. Nevertheless, given the scarcity of sex-based studies on this drug, further studies are needed to explore sex-based differences, as the results obtained may be crucial to clinical practice and help improve the quality of life of patients.

Safety of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a focus on the adverse effects of clozapine

Clozapine, a dibenzodiazepine developed in 1961, is a multireceptorial atypical antipsychotic approved for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia. Since its introduction, it has remained the drug of choice in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, despite a wide range of adverse effects, as it is a very effective drug in everyday clinical practice. However, clozapine is not considered as a top-of-the-line treatment because it may often be difficult for some patients to tolerate as some adverse effects can be particularly bothersome (i.e. sedation, weight gain, sialorrhea etc.) and it has some other potentially dangerous and life-threatening side effects (i.e. myocarditis, seizures, agranulocytosis or granulocytopenia, gastrointestinal hypomotility etc.). As poor treatment adherence in patients with resistant schizophrenia may increase the risk of a psychotic relapse, which may further lead to impaired social and cognitive functioning, psychiatric hospitalizations and increased treatment costs, clozapine adverse effects are a common reason for discontinuing this medication. Therefore, every effort should be made to monitor and minimize these adverse effects in order to improve their early detection and management. The aim of this paper is to briefly summarize and provide an update on major clozapine adverse effects, especially focusing on those that are severe and potentially life threatening, even if most of the latter are relatively uncommon.

Implications of infection and trends of antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients diagnosed with serious mental illness

Hospital-acquired infections have been recognized as a significant factor in increased morbidity and mortality across our health system. Unique to infections associated with inpatient psychiatric hospitalization is the additional hypothesized association of the role that antipsychotic agents and/or underlying disease may play in an increased risk for infection. In this paper, we explore the types of infections diagnosed in an inpatient psychiatric hospital, the demographics of the patients infected, and whether or not the patient was on antipsychotic agents at the time of infection.

An update of safety of clinically used atypical antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

The atypical antipsychotic (APs) drugs have become the most widely used agents to treat a variety of psychoses because of their superiority with regard to safety and tolerability profile compared to conventional/'typical' APs.

AREAS COVERED

We aimed at providing a synthesis of most current evidence about the safety and tolerability profile of the most clinically used atypical APs so far marketed. Qualitative synthesis followed an electronic search made inquiring of the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception until January 2016, combining free terms and MESH headings for the topics of psychiatric disorders and all atypical APs as following: ((safety OR adverse events OR side effects) AND (aripiprazole OR asenapine OR quetiapine OR olanzapine OR risperidone OR paliperidone OR ziprasidone OR lurasidone OR clozapine OR amisulpride OR iloperidone)).

EXPERT OPINION

A critical issue in the treatment with atypical APs is represented by their metabolic side effect profile (e.g. weight gain, lipid and glycaemic imbalance, risk of diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis) which may limit their use in particular clinical samples. Electrolyte imbalance, ECG abnormalities and cardiovascular adverse effects may recommend a careful baseline and periodic assessments.