1
|
Kang H, Auzenbergs M, Clapham H, Maure C, Kim JH, Salje H, Taylor CG, Lim A, Clark A, Edmunds WJ, Sahastrabuddhe S, Brady OJ, Abbas K. Chikungunya seroprevalence, force of infection, and prevalence of chronic disability after infection in endemic and epidemic settings: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2024; 24:488-503. [PMID: 38342105 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00810-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chikungunya is an arboviral disease transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes with a growing global burden linked to climate change and globalisation. We aimed to estimate chikungunya seroprevalence, force of infection (FOI), and prevalence of related chronic disability and hospital admissions in endemic and epidemic settings. METHODS In this systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study, we searched PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science for articles published from database inception until Sept 26, 2022, for prospective and retrospective cross-sectional studies that addressed serological chikungunya virus infection in any geographical region, age group, and population subgroup and for longitudinal prospective and retrospective cohort studies with data on chronic chikungunya or hospital admissions in people with chikungunya. We did a systematic review of studies on chikungunya seroprevalence and fitted catalytic models to each survey to estimate location-specific FOI (ie, the rate at which susceptible individuals acquire chikungunya infection). We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed chikungunya who had chronic chikungunya or were admitted to hospital following infection. We used a random-effects model to assess the relationship between chronic sequelae and follow-up length using linear regression. The systematic review protocol is registered online on PROSPERO, CRD42022363102. FINDINGS We identified 60 studies with data on seroprevalence and chronic chikungunya symptoms done across 76 locations in 38 countries, and classified 17 (22%) of 76 locations as endemic settings and 59 (78%) as epidemic settings. The global long-term median annual FOI was 0·007 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·003-0·010) and varied from 0·0001 (0·00004-0·0002) to 0·113 (0·07-0·20). The highest estimated median seroprevalence at age 10 years was in south Asia (8·0% [95% UI 6·5-9·6]), followed by Latin America and the Caribbean (7·8% [4·9-14·6]), whereas median seroprevalence was lowest in the Middle East (1·0% [0·5-1·9]). We estimated that 51% (95% CI 45-58) of people with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic chikungunya had chronic disability after infection and 4% (3-5) were admitted to hospital following infection. INTERPRETATION We inferred subnational heterogeneity in long-term average annual FOI and transmission dynamics and identified both endemic and epidemic settings across different countries. Brazil, Ethiopia, Malaysia, and India included both endemic and epidemic settings. Long-term average annual FOI was higher in epidemic settings than endemic settings. However, long-term cumulative incidence of chikungunya can be similar between large outbreaks in epidemic settings with a high FOI and endemic settings with a relatively low FOI. FUNDING International Vaccine Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyolim Kang
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Seoul National University College of Medicine School, Seoul, South Korea.
| | | | - Hannah Clapham
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clara Maure
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Henrik Salje
- Department of Genetics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Ahyoung Lim
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew Clark
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - W John Edmunds
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Sushant Sahastrabuddhe
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université Jean Monnet, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, INSERM, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Oliver J Brady
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kaja Abbas
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iwu-Jaja C, Iwu CD, Jaca A, Wiysonge CS. New Vaccine Introductions in WHO African Region between 2000 and 2022. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1722. [PMID: 38006054 PMCID: PMC10675678 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in vaccine development worldwide. This study examined the WHO African Region's vaccine introduction trends from 2000 to 2022, excluding COVID-19 vaccines. We extracted data on vaccine introductions from the WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form for 17 vaccines. We examined the frequency and percentages of vaccine introductions from 2000 to 2022, as well as between two specific time periods (2000-2010 and 2011-2022). We analysed Gavi eligible and ineligible countries separately and used a Chi-squared test to determine if vaccine introductions differed significantly. Three vaccines have been introduced in all 47 countries within the region: hepatitis B (HepB), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). Between 2011 and 2022, HepB, Hib, IPV, the second dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV2), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) were the five most frequently introduced vaccines. Hepatitis A vaccine has only been introduced in Mauritius, while Japanese encephalitis vaccine has not been introduced in any African country. Between 2000-2010 and 2011-2022, a statistically significant rise in the number of vaccine introductions was noted (p < 0.001) with a significant positive association between Gavi eligibility and vaccine introductions (p < 0.001). Significant progress has been made in the introduction of new vaccines between 2000 and 2022 in the WHO African Region, with notable introductions between 2011 and 2022. Commitments from countries, and establishing the infrastructure required for effective implementation, remain crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinwe Iwu-Jaja
- Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville P.O. Box 06, Congo;
| | - Chidozie Declan Iwu
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0031, South Africa;
| | - Anelisa Jaca
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa;
| | - Charles Shey Wiysonge
- Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville P.O. Box 06, Congo;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moore HC, Cannon JW, Kaslow DC, Lamagni T, Bowen AC, Miller KM, Cherian T, Carapetis J, Van Beneden C. A systematic framework for prioritising burden of disease data required for vaccine development and implementation: the case for group A streptococcal diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:1245-1254. [PMID: 35438130 PMCID: PMC9525082 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccine development and implementation decisions need to be guided by accurate and robust burden of disease data. We developed an innovative systematic framework outlining the properties of such data that are needed to advance vaccine development and evaluation, and prioritize research and surveillance activities. We focus on 4 objectives—advocacy, regulatory oversight and licensure, policy and post-licensure evaluation, and post-licensure financing—and identify key stakeholders and specific requirements for burden of disease data aligned with each objective. We apply this framework to group A Streptococcus, a pathogen with an underrecognized global burden, and give specific examples pertinent to 8 clinical endpoints. This dynamic framework can be adapted for any disease with a vaccine in development and can be updated as vaccine candidates progress through clinical trials. This framework will also help with research and innovation priority setting of the Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030) and accelerate development of future vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah C Moore
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jeffrey W Cannon
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Asha C Bowen
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kate M Miller
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Jonathan Carapetis
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Suwantika AA, Supadmi W, Ali M, Abdulah R. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of dengue vaccination in Indonesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0009664. [PMID: 34383764 PMCID: PMC8384188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the fact that the incidence and mortality rates due to dengue virus (DENV) infection in Indonesia are relatively high, dengue vaccination has not yet been introduced. This study aimed to analyse the cost-effectiveness and the budget impact of dengue vaccination in Indonesia by taking the potential of pre-vaccination screening into account. An age-structured decision tree model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness value by applying a single cohort of 4,710,100 children that was followed-up in a 10-year time horizon within a 1-year analytical cycle. The budget impact was analysed in a 5-year period (2020-2024) by considering provinces' readiness to introduce dengue vaccine and their incidence rate of DENV infection in the last 10 years. Vaccination that was coupled with pre-vaccination screening would reduce dengue fever (DF), dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) by 188,142, 148,089 and 426 cases, respectively. It would save treatment cost at $23,433,695 and $14,091,642 from the healthcare and payer perspective, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) would be $5,733 and $5,791 per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained from both perspectives. The most influential parameters affecting the ICERs were probability of DENV infection, vaccine efficacy, under-reporting factor, vaccine price, case fatality rate and screening cost. It can be concluded that dengue vaccination and pre-vaccination screening would be cost-effective to be implemented in Indonesia. Nevertheless, it seems unaffordable to be implemented since the total required cost for the nationwide vaccination would be 94.44% of routine immunization budget.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Auliya Abdurrohim Suwantika
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Woro Supadmi
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Mohammad Ali
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Rizky Abdulah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luthra K, Zimmermann Jin A, Vasudevan P, Kirk K, Marzetta C, Privor-Dumm L. Assessing vaccine introduction and uptake timelines in Gavi-supported countries: are introduction timelines accelerating across vaccine delivery platforms? BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-005032. [PMID: 34045183 PMCID: PMC8162093 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies identified factors influencing regulatory approval to introduction timelines for individual vaccines. However, introduction and uptake timelines have not been comprehensively assessed across the portfolio of Gavi-supported vaccines. Methods We analysed median times between introduction milestones from vaccine licensure to country introduction and uptake across six vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), three delivery platforms and 69 Gavi-supported countries. Data were gathered from public, partner and manufacturer records. VPDs and prequalified vaccines analysed included Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwP-HepB-Hib, pentavalent), pneumococcal disease (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV), rotavirus diarrhoea (rotavirus vaccine, RVV), cervical cancer (human papillomavirus vaccine, HPV), polio (inactivated polio vaccine, IPV) and meningococcal meningitis (meningococcal group A conjugate vaccine, MenA). Results Median time from first vaccine licensure to first Gavi-supported country introduction across VPDs at a ‘global level’ (Gavi-supported countries) was 5.4 years. Once licensed, MenA vaccines reached first introduction fastest (campaign=0.6 years; routine immunisation (RI)=1.7 years). Most introductions were delayed. Country uptake following first introduction was accelerated for more recently Gavi-supported RI vaccines compared with older ones. Conclusion Factors accelerating timelines across delivery platforms included rapid product prequalifications by WHO, strong initial recommendations by the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization, achieving target product profiles on first vaccine licensure within a VPD and completing several VPD milestones at a global level prior to licensure. Milestones required for introduction in Gavi-supported countries should start prior or in parallel to licensure to accelerate uptake of vaccines delivered through diverse delivery platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna Luthra
- International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Vaccines & Sustainability, GAVI Alliance, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anna Zimmermann Jin
- (Formerly Applied Strategies), Strategic Decisions Group, Palo Alto, California, USA.,Skoll Foundation, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Prarthana Vasudevan
- International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Karen Kirk
- International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,ESS, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA
| | - Carol Marzetta
- (Formerly Applied Strategies), Strategic Decisions Group, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Lois Privor-Dumm
- International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA .,International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alderson MR, Welsch JA, Regan K, Newhouse L, Bhat N, Marfin AA. Vaccines to Prevent Meningitis: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9040771. [PMID: 33917003 PMCID: PMC8067733 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in the development and introduction of vaccines against the major bacterial causes of meningitis, the disease and its long-term after-effects remain a problem globally. The Global Roadmap to Defeat Meningitis by 2030 aims to accelerate progress through visionary and strategic goals that place a major emphasis on preventing meningitis via vaccination. Global vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) is the most advanced, such that successful and low-cost combination vaccines incorporating Hib are broadly available. More affordable pneumococcal conjugate vaccines are becoming increasingly available, although countries ineligible for donor support still face access challenges and global serotype coverage is incomplete with existing licensed vaccines. Meningococcal disease control in Africa has progressed with the successful deployment of a low-cost serogroup A conjugate vaccine, but other serogroups still cause outbreaks in regions of the world where broadly protective and affordable vaccines have not been introduced into routine immunization programs. Progress has lagged for prevention of neonatal meningitis and although maternal vaccination against the leading cause, group B streptococcus (GBS), has progressed into clinical trials, no GBS vaccine has thus far reached Phase 3 evaluation. This article examines current and future efforts to control meningitis through vaccination.
Collapse
|
7
|
Donadel M, Panero MS, Ametewee L, Shefer AM. National decision-making for the introduction of new vaccines: A systematic review, 2010-2020. Vaccine 2021; 39:1897-1909. [PMID: 33750592 PMCID: PMC10370349 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Competing priorities make using a transparent and evidence-based approach important when deciding to recommend new vaccines. We conducted a literature review to document the processes and frameworks for national decision-making on new vaccine introductions and explored which key features have evolved since 2010. METHODS We searched literature published on policymaking related to vaccine introduction from March 2010 to August 2020 in six databases. We screened articles for eligibility with the following exclusion criteria: non-human or hypothetical vaccines, the sole focus on economic evaluation or decision to adopt rather than policy decision-making. We employed nine broad categories of criteria from the 2012 review for categorization and abstracted data on the country, income level, vaccine, and other relevant criteria. RESULTS Of the 3808 unique references screened, 116 met eligibility criteria and were classified as: a) framework of vaccine adoption decision-making (27), b) studies that analyse empirical data on or examples of vaccine adoption decision-making (45), c) theoretical and empirical articles that provide insights into the vaccine policymaking process (44 + 17 already included in the previous categories). Commonly reported criteria for decision-making were the burden of disease; vaccine efficacy/effectiveness, safety; impact on health and non-health outcomes; economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions. Programmatic and acceptability aspects were not as often considered. Most (50; 82%) of the 61 articles describing the process of vaccine introduction policymaking highlighted the role of country, regional, or global evidence-informed recommendations and a robust national governance as enabling factors for vaccine adoption. CONCLUSIONS The literature on vaccine adoption decision-making has expanded since 2010. We found that policymakers and expert advisory committee members (e.g., National Immunization Technical Advisory Group [NITAG]) increasingly value the interventions based on economic evaluations. The results of this review could guide discussions on evidence-informed immunization decision-making among country, sub-regional, and regional stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgane Donadel
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Maria Susana Panero
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lynnette Ametewee
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Abigail M Shefer
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suwantika AA, Purwadi FV, Zakiyah N, Puspitasari IM, Abdulah R, Diantini A, Boersma C, Postma MJ. Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize the introduction of new vaccines in Indonesia by using the framework of the strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines (SMART vaccines). Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:83-91. [PMID: 33428502 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1874926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Decision-making processes regarding new vaccine prioritizations are complex. The objective of this study was to prioritize the introduction of new vaccines in Indonesia.Methods: A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied in this study. A preliminary data collection form was developed to collect country-specific data in relation to 30 pre-defined attributes. In particular, an open-ended questionnaire was conducted among targeted respondents from global level, national level and vaccine manufacturers, which were involved in the financial flows of new vaccine procurement in Indonesia. For setting new vaccines priorities, targeted respondents were asked to assign weight on 10 selected criteria.Results: Top 3 attributes with the highest weight from respondents were premature deaths averted per year, incident cases prevented per year, and cost-effectiveness. Applying criteria scores and weight assessment, the result showed that PCV, rotavirus, HPV, and JE would be on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rank for setting new vaccine priority in Indonesia. There was a significant difference score (p value <0.05) between all these vaccines.Conclusions: PCV, rotavirus and HPV vaccines should be more prioritized than JE vaccine. This ranking is in line with the WHO's priority list, which potentially illustrates the validity and usefulness of our MCDA-approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Auliya A Suwantika
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Febby V Purwadi
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Neily Zakiyah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Irma M Puspitasari
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Rizky Abdulah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Ajeng Diantini
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Cornelis Boersma
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.,Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodrigues CMC, Plotkin SA. Impact of Vaccines; Health, Economic and Social Perspectives. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1526. [PMID: 32760367 PMCID: PMC7371956 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 250] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In the 20th century, the development, licensing and implementation of vaccines as part of large, systematic immunization programs started to address health inequities that existed globally. However, at the time of writing, access to vaccines that prevent life-threatening infectious diseases remains unequal to all infants, children and adults in the world. This is a problem that many individuals and agencies are working hard to address globally. As clinicians and biomedical scientists we often focus on the health benefits that vaccines provide, in the prevention of ill-health and death from infectious pathogens. Here we discuss the health, economic and social benefits of vaccines that have been identified and studied in recent years, impacting all regions and all age groups. After learning of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in December 2019, and its potential for global dissemination to cause COVID-19 disease was realized, there was an urgent need to develop vaccines at an unprecedented rate and scale. As we appreciate and quantify the health, economic and social benefits of vaccines and immunization programs to individuals and society, we should endeavor to communicate this to the public and policy makers, for the benefit of endemic, epidemic, and pandemic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene M. C. Rodrigues
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stanley A. Plotkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nayyar A, Privor-Dumm L. Cholera control and prevention: Role of evidence-based advocacy and communications. Vaccine 2020; 38 Suppl 1:A178-A180. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
11
|
Nomhwange TI, Shuaib F, Braka F, Godwin S, Kariko U, Gregory U, Tegegne SG, Okposen B, Onoka C. Routine immunization community surveys as a tool for guiding program implementation in Kaduna state, Nigeria 2015-2016. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:1313. [PMID: 30541515 PMCID: PMC6291913 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6197-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Routine childhood immunization remains an important strategy for achieving polio eradication and maintaining a polio-free world. To address gaps in reported administrative coverage data, community surveys were conducted to verify coverage, and guide strategic interventions for improved coverage. Methods We reviewed the conduct of community surveys by World Health Organization (WHO) field volunteers deployed as part of the surge capacity to Kaduna state and the use of survey results between July 2015 and June 2016. Monthly and quarterly collation and use of these data to guide the deployment of various interventions aimed at strengthening routine immunization in the state. Results Over 97,000 children aged 0–11 months were surveyed by 138 field volunteers across 237 of the 255 wards in Kaduna state. Fully or appropriately immunized children increased from 67% in the fourth quarter of 2015 to 76% by the end of the second quarter of 2016. Within the period reviewed, the number of local government areas with < 80% coverage reduced from eight to zero. Conclusions The routine conduct of community surveys by volunteers to inform interventions has shown an improvement in the vaccination status of children 0–11 months in Kaduna state and remains a useful tool in addressing administrative data quality issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fiona Braka
- World Health Organization Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Sambo Godwin
- World Health Organization, Kaduna Field Office, Kaduna, Nigeria
| | - Usman Kariko
- Kaduna State Primary Healthcare Development Agency, Kaduna, Nigeria
| | - Umeh Gregory
- World Health Organization Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Chima Onoka
- National Primary Health Care Agency, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zipursky S, Patel M, Farrell M, Gonzalez AR, Kachra T, Folly Y, Kurji F, Veira CL, Wootton E, Hampton LM. Lessons Learned From Managing the Planning and Implementation of Inactivated Polio Vaccine Introduction in Support of the Polio Endgame. J Infect Dis 2017; 216:S15-S23. [PMID: 28838203 PMCID: PMC5853318 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The Immunization Systems Management Group (IMG) was established as a time-limited entity, responsible for the management and coordination of Objective 2 of the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan. This objective called for the introduction of at least 1 dose of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) into the routine immunization programs of all countries using oral polio vaccine (OPV) only. Despite global vaccine shortages, which limited countries' abilities to access IPV in a timely manner, 105 of 126 countries using OPV only introduced IPV within a 2.5-year period, making it the fastest rollout of a new vaccine in history. This achievement can be attributed to several factors, including the coordination work of the IMG; high-level engagement and advocacy across partners; the strong foundations of the Expanded Programme on Immunization at all levels; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance's vaccine introduction experiences and mechanisms; innovative approaches; and proactive communications. In many ways, the IMG's work on IPV introduction can serve as a model for other vaccine introductions, especially in an accelerated context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Margaret Farrell
- Programme Division, United Nations Children's Fund, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Yann Folly
- Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Lee M Hampton
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaufman J, Ames H, Bosch-Capblanch X, Cartier Y, Cliff J, Glenton C, Lewin S, Muloliwa AM, Oku A, Oyo-Ita A, Rada G, Hill S. The comprehensive 'Communicate to Vaccinate' taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:423. [PMID: 28486956 PMCID: PMC5424416 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4320-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication can be used to generate demand for vaccination or address vaccine hesitancy, and is crucial to successful childhood vaccination programmes. Research efforts have primarily focused on communication for routine vaccination. However, vaccination campaigns, particularly in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), also use communication in diverse ways. Without a comprehensive framework integrating communication interventions from routine and campaign contexts, it is not possible to conceptualise the full range of possible vaccination communication interventions. Therefore, vaccine programme managers may be unaware of potential communication options and researchers may not focus on building evidence for interventions used in practice. In this paper, we broaden the scope of our existing taxonomy of communication interventions for routine vaccination to include communication used in campaigns, and integrate these into a comprehensive taxonomy of vaccination communication interventions. METHODS Building on our taxonomy of communication for routine vaccination, we identified communication interventions used in vaccination campaigns through a targeted literature search; observation of vaccination activities in Cameroon, Mozambique and Nigeria; and stakeholder consultations. We added these interventions to descriptions of routine vaccination communication and categorised the interventions according to their intended purposes, building from an earlier taxonomy of communication related to routine vaccination. RESULTS The comprehensive taxonomy groups communication used in campaigns and routine childhood vaccination into seven purpose categories: 'Inform or Educate'; 'Remind or Recall'; 'Enhance Community Ownership'; 'Teach Skills'; 'Provide Support'; 'Facilitate Decision Making' and 'Enable Communication'. Consultations with LMIC stakeholders and experts informed the taxonomy's definitions and structure and established its potential uses. CONCLUSIONS This taxonomy provides a standardised way to think and speak about vaccination communication. It is categorised by purpose to help conceptualise communication interventions as potential solutions to address needs or problems. It can be utilised by programme planners, implementers, researchers and funders to see the range of communication interventions used in practice, facilitate evidence synthesis and identify evidence gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Kaufman
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Heather Ames
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yuri Cartier
- International Union for Health Promotion and Education, Saint-Maurice Cedex, France
| | - Julie Cliff
- Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Gabriel Rada
- Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sophie Hill
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang YX, Tao H, Hu JL, Li JX, Dai WM, Sun JF, Liu P, Tang J, Liu WY, Zhu FC. The immunogenicity and safety of a Hib-MenAC vaccine: a non-inferiority randomized, observer-blind trial in infants aged 3-5 months. Expert Rev Vaccines 2017; 16:515-524. [PMID: 28277801 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2017.1303380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the novel combined Haemophilus influenzae type b-Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A and C-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Hib-MenAC). METHODS We conducted a non-inferiority, randomized, observer-blind, positive control clinical trial in 900 healthy infants aged between 3-5 months in Funing County, Jiangsu Province, China. Participants were randomly allocated, in a ratio of 2:1 (block = 6), to receive experimental combined Hib-MenAC vaccines co-administrated with placebo or the co-administration of licensed Hib vaccine and MenAC vaccine, according to a three-dose immunization schedule. The seroconversion of antibody titer against meningococcal serogroups A, C and Hib was the primary endpoint. RESULTS The experimental vaccines was non-inferior to the licensed two control vaccines. Participants receiving experimental Hib-MenAC vaccines showed a seroconversion rate of 99.0%, 96.1% and 97.7% for rSBA-MenA, rSBA-MenC and anti-PRP antibodies, respectively. The Hib-MenAC vaccine did not result in an increase in adverse reaction, and no serious adverse event was judged to be related to the vaccination. CONCLUSIONS The novel combined Hib-MenAC conjugate vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic in infants aged between 3 to 5 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xiao Wang
- a School of Public Health , Southeast University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Hong Tao
- b Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Jian-Li Hu
- b Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Jing-Xin Li
- b Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Wei-Ming Dai
- b Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Jin-Fang Sun
- a School of Public Health , Southeast University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Pei Liu
- a School of Public Health , Southeast University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Jie Tang
- c Acute Infectious Disease Prevention Department , Funing County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Yancheng , PR China
| | - Wen-Yu Liu
- c Acute Infectious Disease Prevention Department , Funing County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Yancheng , PR China
| | - Feng-Cai Zhu
- a School of Public Health , Southeast University , Nanjing , PR China.,b Vaccine Clinical Evaluation Department , Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Nanjing , PR China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lim JK, Lee YS, Wilder-Smith A, Thiry G, Mahoney R, Yoon IK. Points for Consideration for dengue vaccine introduction – recommendations by the Dengue Vaccine Initiative. Expert Rev Vaccines 2016; 15:529-38. [DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1129279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
16
|
Addressing vaccine hesitancy: The potential value of commercial and social marketing principles and practices. Vaccine 2015; 33:4204-11. [PMID: 25900132 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Many countries and communities are dealing with groups and growing numbers of individuals who are delaying or refusing recommended vaccinations for themselves or their children. This has created a need for immunization programs to find approaches and strategies to address vaccine hesitancy. An important source of useful approaches and strategies is found in the frameworks, practices, and principles used by commercial and social marketers, many of which have been used by immunization programs. This review examines how social and commercial marketing principles and practices can be used to help address vaccine hesitancy. It provides an introduction to key marketing and social marketing concepts, identifies some of the major challenges to applying commercial and social marketing approaches to immunization programs, illustrates how immunization advocates and programs can use marketing and social marketing approaches to address vaccine hesitancy, and identifies some of the lessons that commercial and non-immunization sectors have learned that may have relevance for immunization. While the use of commercial and social marketing practices and principles does not guarantee success, the evidence, lessons learned, and applications to date indicate that they have considerable value in fostering vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cavallaro KF, Sandhu HS, Hyde TB, Johnson BW, Fischer M, Mayer LW, Clark TA, Pallansch MA, Yin Z, Zuo S, Hadler SC, Diorditsa S, Hasan ASMM, Bose AS, Dietz V. Expansion of syndromic vaccine preventable disease surveillance to include bacterial meningitis and Japanese encephalitis: evaluation of adapting polio and measles laboratory networks in Bangladesh, China and India, 2007-2008. Vaccine 2015; 33:1168-75. [PMID: 25597940 PMCID: PMC4830482 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 12/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis with laboratory confirmation has been a key strategy in the global polio eradication initiative, and the laboratory platform established for polio testing has been expanded in many countries to include surveillance for cases of febrile rash illness to identify measles and rubella cases. Vaccine-preventable disease surveillance is essential to detect outbreaks, define disease burden, guide vaccination strategies and assess immunization impact. Vaccines now exist to prevent Japanese encephalitis (JE) and some etiologies of bacterial meningitis. METHODS We evaluated the feasibility of expanding polio-measles surveillance and laboratory networks to detect bacterial meningitis and JE, using surveillance for acute meningitis-encephalitis syndrome in Bangladesh and China and acute encephalitis syndrome in India. We developed nine syndromic surveillance performance indicators based on international surveillance guidelines and calculated scores using supervisory visit reports, annual reports, and case-based surveillance data. RESULTS Scores, variable by country and targeted disease, were highest for the presence of national guidelines, sustainability, training, availability of JE laboratory resources, and effectiveness of using polio-measles networks for JE surveillance. Scores for effectiveness of building on polio-measles networks for bacterial meningitis surveillance and specimen referral were the lowest, because of differences in specimens and techniques. CONCLUSIONS Polio-measles surveillance and laboratory networks provided useful infrastructure for establishing syndromic surveillance and building capacity for JE diagnosis, but were less applicable for bacterial meningitis. Laboratory-supported surveillance for vaccine-preventable bacterial diseases will require substantial technical and financial support to enhance local diagnostic capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F Cavallaro
- Global Immunization Division, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Hardeep S Sandhu
- Global Immunization Division, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Terri B Hyde
- Global Immunization Division, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Barbara W Johnson
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marc Fischer
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Leonard W Mayer
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Thomas A Clark
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark A Pallansch
- Division of Viral Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Zundong Yin
- National Immunization Programme, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuyan Zuo
- World Health Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | - Anindya S Bose
- National Polio Surveillance Project, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India
| | - Vance Dietz
- Global Immunization Division, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Montgomery Collins
- Section of Retrovirology & Global Health, Center for International Adoption, and Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative, Texas Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suwantika AA, Zakiyah N, Lestari K, Postma MJ. Accelerating the introduction of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia. Expert Rev Vaccines 2014; 13:463-72. [DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2014.891940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
20
|
Enhancing the work of the Department of Health and Human Services national vaccine program in global immunization: recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on September 12, 2013. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 Suppl 3:12-85. [PMID: 25100887 PMCID: PMC4121882 DOI: 10.1177/00333549141295s305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
21
|
Abstract
This month, on November 12, the world will recognize the fourth annual World Pneumonia Day. First launched in 2009 by a coalition of global health leaders (1), World Pneumonia Day aims to raise awareness about pneumonia's toll on the world's children and to promote interventions to protect against, treat, and prevent the disease. Pneumonia continues to be the leading killer of young children around the world, causing ≈14% of all deaths in children 1 month to 5 years of age (2). It is a critical disease for countries to conquer in order to reach Millennium Development Goal 4: reducing the child mortality rate by two thirds from 1990 to 2015 (3). Most children who die from pneumonia live in developing countries, where such factors as malnutrition, crowding, and lack of access to quality health care increase the risk for death. Pneumonia kills few children in industrialized countries, although it remains among the top 10 causes of deaths in the United States, for example, because of deaths in older adults (4).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana Hajjeh
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,GA 30333, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Greenwood B, Salisbury D, Hill AVS. Vaccines and global health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011; 366:2733-42. [PMID: 21893534 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccines have made a major contribution to global health in recent decades but they could do much more. In November 2011, a Royal Society discussion meeting, 'New vaccines for global health', was held in London to discuss the past contribution of vaccines to global health and to consider what more could be expected in the future. Papers presented at the meeting reviewed recent successes in the deployment of vaccines against major infections of childhood and the challenges faced in developing vaccines against some of the world's remaining major infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malaria and tuberculosis. The important contribution that development of more effective veterinary vaccines could make to global health was also addressed. Some of the social and financial challenges to the development and deployment of new vaccines were reviewed. The latter issues were also discussed at a subsequent satellite meeting, 'Accelerating vaccine development', held at the Kavli Royal Society International Centre. Delegates at this meeting considered challenges to the more rapid development and deployment of both human and veterinary vaccines and how these might be addressed. Papers based on presentations at the discussion meeting and a summary of the main conclusions of the satellite meeting are included in this issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Greenwood
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|