Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus eradication therapy in orthopaedic surgery

General skin and nasal decolonization with octenisan® set before and after elective orthopedic surgery in selected patients at elevated risk for revision surgery and surgical site infections-a single-center, unblinded, superiority, randomized controlled trial (BALGDEC trial)

BACKGROUND

The preoperative body surface and nasal decolonization may reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) but yields conflicting results in the current orthopedic literature.

METHODS

We perform a single-center, randomized-controlled, superiority trial in favor of the preoperative decolonization using a commercial product (octenidine® set). We will randomize a total number of 1000 adult elective orthopedic patients with a high risk for SSI and/or wound complications (age ≥ 80 years, chronic immune-suppression, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 points) between a decolonization (octenisan® wash lotion 1 × per day and octenisan® md nasal gel 2-3 × per day; during 5 days) and no decolonization. Decolonized patients will additionally fill a questionnaire regarding the practical difficulties, the completeness, and the adverse events of decolonization. The primary outcomes are SSI and revision surgeries for postoperative wound problems until 6 weeks postoperatively (or 1 year for surgeries with implants or bone). Secondary outcomes are unplanned revision surgeries for non-infectious problems and all adverse events. With 95% event-free surgeries in the decolonization arm versus 90% in the control arm, we formally need 2 × 474 elective orthopedic surgeries included during 2 years.

DISCUSSION

In selected adult orthopedic patients with a high risk for SSI, the presurgical decolonization may reduce postoperative wound problems, including SSI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05647252. Registered on 9 December 2022.

PROTOCOL VERSION

2 (5 December 2022).

The Influence of Iodine-Impregnated Incision Drapes on the Bacterial Contamination of Scalpel Blades in Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a disastrous and feared complication in arthroplasty. Over the past decades, surgeons have tried to lower infection rates through all sorts of improvements. At present, it is impossible to reduce the risk to zero. As the contamination of surgical instruments and the surgical field has been identified as a remaining gap prone for infection, scalpel blades among others have become a focal point of several studies. This study is the first to compare the effect of adhesive incision drapes on contamination rates of scalpel blades in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

METHODS

A total of 344 microbiologic blade culture results from 2 study groups with and without drape usage and 1 group with known PJI were analyzed and compared to histopathologic and microbiologic tissue results.

RESULTS

In 78% of all positive cultures, the bacteria were part of the local skin flora. The contamination rate for the skin blades with a drape was 3.81% vs 12.19% without drape usage. A significant difference was determined between positive skin blade culture results incision drape usage (P = .031). The different pathogens likely responsible for the PJI correlated with the deep blade cultures (P ≤ .01). The overall contamination rate of surgical blades (1.37%) is comparatively low to the results obtained from other surgical equipment in literature. None of those blade-positive patients developed a surgical site infection during 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Iodine-impregnated incision drapes are able to reduce surgical skin blade contamination. Further studies may be needed to assess the relationship between blade contamination and surgical site infections.

Can nasal Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization prior to elective total joint arthroplasty reduce surgical site and prosthesis-related infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Nasal Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) screening and decolonization has been widely used to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) prior to total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA). However, it remains considerably controversial. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether this scheme could reduce SSIs and periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following elective primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

Methods

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October, 2019. Outcomes of interest included SSI, PJI, superficial infection, and different bacterial species that caused infections. Data from eligible studies were then extracted and synthesized. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We also performed additional analyses to evaluate whether there were differences in postoperative SSIs caused by S. aureus or other bacteria.

Results

Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled data elucidated that nasal S. aureus screening and decolonization dramatically mitigated the risk of SSI, PJI, and superficial infection compared to nondecolonization group. The analysis of bacterial species causing infection also showed that the S. aureus infections postoperative were significantly decreased in the decolonization group. However, there was no statistical difference in the SSI caused by other bacteria between the two groups.

Conclusion

S. aureus screening and decolonization prior to elective primary THA and TKA could significantly decrease the risk of SSI and PJI. However, more robust studies are needed to further evaluate the impact of S. aureus screening and decolonization on infection risk after TJA.

The microbiology of chronic osteomyelitis: Changes over ten years

AIM

This study quantified changes in the microbiology of osteomyelitis over a ten year period from a single centre within the UK with regard to infection with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and susceptibility of antimicrobial regimens.

METHOD

Patients with chronic osteomyelitis undergoing definitive surgery from 2013-2017 were inluded (n = 223). Microbiology was compared to patients in a cohort from 2001-2004, using the same diagnostic criteria, and same deep tissue sampling technique (n = 157). Clinical features associated with MDR bacterial infection were analysed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Despite a similar proportion of Staphylococcus aureus in both cohorts, the rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was lower in 2013-2017 compared to 2001-2004 (11.4% vs 30.8% of Staphylococcus aureus, p = 0.007). However, the proportion of MDR infections was similar in both cohorts (15.2% versus 17.2%). Metalwork was associated with MDR infection (unadjusted OR 5.0; 95% CI: 1.15 to 22.0). There was no change in resistance to glycopeptide / meropenem combination treatment (2.2% vs 2.5%, p > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In this centre, rates of MRSA osteomyelitis have fallen by two thirds, over the past 10 years, in line with the reducing rate of MRSA bacteraemia nationally. A history of metalwork may predict MDR infection. A glycopeptide with an anti-pseudomonal carbapenem remains the post-operative empiric systemic regimen of choice. Resistance patterns support the use of a glycopeptide with an aminoglycoside in local antibiotic therapy.

Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization strategies: a review

Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health-care costs. Persistent nasal carriage of S. aureus found in 10-30% of the general population, constitutes a risk factor for these infections. Nasal decolonization is one of the used strategies to prevent this risk in some situations. Areas covered: Mupirocin nasal ointment has been used for the nasal decolonization and prevention of staphylococcal infections in various settings like surgeries. However, rising rates of resistance to mupirocin require the development of new decolonization agents. In this review, we will discuss mupirocin, its origins, studies that proved its efficacy and the associated resistance, as well as other decolonization agents under investigation. Expert opinion: As some limitations exist to mupirocin use, further research for alternatives is encouraged. Some old approved antiseptics (chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine) or antibiotics (rifampicin, bacitracin) have been investigated for their efficacy in this indication. Other new agents (tea tree oil, retapamulin, LTX-109, XF-73, phages, lysostaphin, squalamine analogues, etc.) are being studied. Some of them are still in preclinical phases, and others have reached clinical trials, but further research is needed. Special interest should be given to single dose decolonization strategies and to molecules that do not select resistant strains.