Recognition of the surface of a homeo domain protein

Novel Antennapedia and Ultrabithorax trimeric complexes with TBP and Exd regulate transcription

BACKGROUND

Hox proteins interact with DNA and many other proteins, co-factors, transcriptional factors, chromatin remodeling components, non-coding RNAs and even the extracellular matrix that assembles the Hox complexes. The number of interacting partners continues to grow with diverse components and more transcriptional factors than initially thought. Hox complexes present many activities, but their molecular mechanisms to modulate their target genes remain unsolved.

RESULTS

In this paper we showed the protein-protein interaction of Antp with Ubx through the homeodomain using BiFC in Drosophila. Analysis of Antp-deletional mutants showed that AntpHD helixes 1 and 2 are required for the interaction with Ubx. Also, we found a novel interaction of Ubx with TBP, in which the PolyQ domain of TBP is required for the interaction. Moreover, we also detected the formation of two new trimeric complexes of Antp with Ubx, TBP and Exd using BiFC-FRET; these proteins, however, do not form a trimeric interaction with BIP2 or TFIIEβ. The novel trimeric complexes reduced Antp transcriptional activity, indicating that they could confer specificity for repression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results increase the number of transcriptional factors in the Antp and Ubx interactomes that form two novel trimeric complexes with TBP and Exd. We also report a new Ubx interaction with TBP. These novel interactions provide important clues of the dynamics of Hox-interacting complexes involved in transcriptional regulation, contributing to better understand Hox function.

Transcription factor TFIIEβ interacts with two exposed positions in helix 2 of the Antennapedia homeodomain to control homeotic function in Drosophila

Homeoproteins contain the conserved homeodomain (HD) and have an important role determining embryo body plan during development. HDs increase their DNA-binding specificity by interacting with additional cofactors outlining a Hox interactome with a multiplicity of protein-protein interactions. In Drosophila, the first link of functional contact with a general transcription factor (GTF) was found between Antennapedia (Antp) and BIP2 (TFIID complex). Hox proteins also interact with other components of Pol II machinery such as the subunit Med19 from Mediator (MED) complex, TFIIEβ and transcription-pausing factor M1BP. All these interactions clearly demonstrate Hox-driven transcriptional regulation, but the precise molecular mechanism remains unclear. In this paper, we focused on the Antp-TFIIEβ protein-protein interface to establish the specific contacts as well as its functional role. Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) in cell culture and in vivo we found that TFIIEβ interacts with Antp through the HD independently of the YPWM motif and the direct physical interaction is at helix 2, specifically aminoacidic positions I32 and H36 of Antp. We also found, through ectopic assays, that these two positions in helix 2 are crucial for Antp homeotic function in head involution, and thoracic and antenna-to tarsus transformations. Interestingly, overexpression of Antp and TFIIEβ in the antennal disc showed that this interaction is required for the antenna-to-tarsus transformation. In conclusion, interaction of Antp with TFIIEβ is important for the functional specificity of Antennapedia, and amino acids 32 and 36 in Antp HD helix 2 are key for this interaction. Our results open the possibility to more broadly analyze Antp-TFIIEβ interaction on the transcriptional control for the activation and/or repression of target genes in the Hox interactome during Drosophila development.

Diversity among POU transcription factors in chromatin recognition and cell fate reprogramming

The POU (Pit-Oct-Unc) protein family is an evolutionary ancient group of transcription factors (TFs) that bind specific DNA sequences to direct gene expression programs. The fundamental importance of POU TFs to orchestrate embryonic development and to direct cellular fate decisions is well established, but the molecular basis for this activity is insufficiently understood. POU TFs possess a bipartite 'two-in-one' DNA binding domain consisting of two independently folding structural units connected by a poorly conserved and flexible linker. Therefore, they represent a paradigmatic example to study the molecular basis for the functional versatility of TFs. Their modular architecture endows POU TFs with the capacity to accommodate alternative composite DNA sequences by adopting different quaternary structures. Moreover, associations with partner proteins crucially influence the selection of their DNA binding sites. The plentitude of DNA binding modes confers the ability to POU TFs to regulate distinct genes in the context of different cellular environments. Likewise, different binding modes of POU proteins to DNA could trigger alternative regulatory responses in the context of different genomic locations of the same cell. Prominent POU TFs such as Oct4, Brn2, Oct6 and Brn4 are not only essential regulators of development but have also been successfully employed to reprogram somatic cells to pluripotency and neural lineages. Here we review biochemical, structural, genomic and cellular reprogramming studies to examine how the ability of POU TFs to select regulatory DNA, alone or with partner factors, is tied to their capacity to epigenetically remodel chromatin and drive specific regulatory programs that give cells their identities.

Unbiased proteomic analysis of proteins interacting with the HIV-1 5'LTR sequence: role of the transcription factor Meis

To depict the largest picture of a core promoter interactome, we developed a one-step DNA-affinity capture method coupled with an improved mass spectrometry analysis process focused on the identification of low abundance proteins. As a proof of concept, this method was developed through the analysis of 230 bp contained in the 5′long terminal repeat (LTR) of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Beside many expected interactions, many new transcriptional regulators were identified, either transcription factors (TFs) or co-regulators, which interact directly or indirectly with the HIV-1 5′LTR. Among them, the homeodomain-containing TF myeloid ectopic viral integration site was confirmed to functionally interact with a specific binding site in the HIV-1 5′LTR and to act as a transcriptional repressor, probably through recruitment of the repressive Sin3A complex. This powerful and validated DNA-affinity approach could also be used as an efficient screening tool to identify a large set of proteins that physically interact, directly or indirectly, with a DNA sequence of interest. Combined with an in silico analysis of the DNA sequence of interest, this approach provides a powerful approach to select the interacting candidates to validate functionally by classical approaches.

Transient reversal of episome silencing precedes VP16-dependent transcription during reactivation of latent HSV-1 in neurons

Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) establishes latency in peripheral neurons, creating a permanent source of recurrent infections. The latent genome is assembled into chromatin and lytic cycle genes are silenced. Processes that orchestrate reentry into productive replication (reactivation) remain poorly understood. We have used latently infected cultures of primary superior cervical ganglion (SCG) sympathetic neurons to profile viral gene expression following a defined reactivation stimulus. Lytic genes are transcribed in two distinct phases, differing in their reliance on protein synthesis, viral DNA replication and the essential initiator protein VP16. The first phase does not require viral proteins and has the appearance of a transient, widespread de-repression of the previously silent lytic genes. This allows synthesis of viral regulatory proteins including VP16, which accumulate in the cytoplasm of the host neuron. During the second phase, VP16 and its cellular cofactor HCF-1, which is also predominantly cytoplasmic, concentrate in the nucleus where they assemble an activator complex on viral promoters. The transactivation function supplied by VP16 promotes increased viral lytic gene transcription leading to the onset of genome amplification and the production of infectious viral particles. Thus regulated localization of de novo synthesized VP16 is likely to be a critical determinant of HSV-1 reactivation in sympathetic neurons.

Herpes simplex virus is a widespread human pathogen that establishes permanent infections in nerves innervating the lips, eyes and other surfaces. The viral DNA genome is transported to the neuronal nucleus located in the nerve ganglia, where it establishes a semi-dormant state known as latency. Periodically, latent viruses undergo reactivation, a process that leads to the production of infectious particles, allowing for person-to-person transmission and acting as the major source for painful lesions (cold sores) and other more severe pathological outcomes. How latency and reactivation are controlled is not well understood. Using cultured nerve cells, we show that reactivation involves a unique, two stage program of viral gene expression. We find that the essential control protein VP16 is synthesized during the first stage but accumulates in the cytoplasm rather than the nucleus where it functions. Nuclear entry is determined by host signaling and marks the onset of the second reactivation stage. This work provides important new insights into the virus-host interaction and reveals a natural control point that could be used in innovative therapies that for the first time target the latent virus.

Control of alpha-herpesvirus IE gene expression by HCF-1 coupled chromatin modification activities

The immediate early genes of the alpha-herpesviruses HSV and VZV are transcriptionally regulated by viral and cellular factors in a complex combinatorial manner. Despite this complexity and the apparent redundancy of activators, the expression of the viral IE genes is critically dependent upon the cellular transcriptional coactivator HCF-1. Although the role of HCF-1 had remained elusive, recent studies have demonstrated that the protein is a component of multiple chromatin modification complexes including the Set1/MLL1 histone H3K4 methyltransferases. Studies using model viral promoter-reporter systems as well as analyses of components recruited to the viral genome during the initiation of infection have elucidated the significance of HCF-1 chromatin modification complexes in contributing to the final state of modified histones assembled on the viral IE promoters. Strikingly, the absence of HCF-1 results in the accumulation of nucleosomes bearing repressive marks on the viral IE promoters and silencing of viral gene expression.

Cellular homeoproteins, SATB1 and CDP, bind to the unique region between the human cytomegalovirus UL127 and major immediate-early genes

An AT-rich region of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) genome between the UL127 open reading frame and the major immediate-early (MIE) enhancer is referred to as the unique region (UR). It has been shown that the UR represses activation of transcription from the UL127 promoter and functions as a boundary between the divergent UL127 and MIE genes during human CMV infection [Angulo, A., Kerry, D., Huang, H., Borst, E.M., Razinsky, A., Wu, J., Hobom, U., Messerle, M., Ghazal, P., 2000. Identification of a boundary domain adjacent to the potent human cytomegalovirus enhancer that represses transcription of the divergent UL127 promoter. J. Virol. 74 (6), 2826-2839; Lundquist, C.A., Meier, J.L., Stinski, M.F., 1999. A strong negative transcriptional regulatory region between the human cytomegalovirus UL127 gene and the major immediate-early enhancer. J. Virol. 73 (11), 9039-9052]. A putative forkhead box-like (FOX-like) site, AAATCAATATT, was identified in the UR and found to play a key role in repression of the UL127 promoter in recombinant virus-infected cells [Lashmit, P.E., Lundquist, C.A., Meier, J.L., Stinski, M.F., 2004. Cellular repressor inhibits human cytomegalovirus transcription from the UL127 promoter. J. Virol. 78 (10), 5113-5123]. However, the cellular factors which associate with the UR and FOX-like region remain to be determined. We reported previously that pancreatic-duodenal homeobox factor-1 (PDX1) bound to a 45-bp element located within the UR [Chao, S.H., Harada, J.N., Hyndman, F., Gao, X., Nelson, C.G., Chanda, S.K., Caldwell, J.S., 2004. PDX1, a Cellular Homeoprotein, Binds to and Regulates the Activity of Human Cytomegalovirus Immediate Early Promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (16), 16111-16120]. Here we demonstrate that two additional cellular homeoproteins, special AT-rich sequence binding protein 1 (SATB1) and CCAAT displacement protein (CDP), bind to the human CMV UR in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, CDP is identified as a FOX-like binding protein and a repressor of the UL127 promoter, while SATB1 has no effect on UL127 expression. Since CDP is known as a transcription repressor and a nuclear matrix-associated region binding protein, CDP may have a role in the regulation of human CMV transcription.

Characterization of NOBOX DNA Binding Specificity and Its Regulation of Gdf9 and Pou5f1 Promoters

Nobox (newborn ovary homeobox gene) deficiency disrupts early folliculogenesis and the expression of oocyte-specific genes in mice. Here, we identified several cis-acting sites, TAATTG, TAGTTG, and TAATTA as NOBOX DNA binding elements (NBEs) using a library of randomly generated oligonucleotides by cyclic amplification of sequence target assay and mutation analyses. We show that NOBOX preferentially binds to the NOBOX binding elements with high affinity. In addition, we found that promoter regions of mouse Pou5f1 and Gdf9 contain one (-426) and three NOBOX binding elements (-786, -967, and -1259), respectively. NOBOX binds to these putative NOBOX binding elements with high affinity and augmented transcriptional activity of luciferase reporter driven by mouse Pou5f1 and Gdf9 promoters containing the NOBOX binding elements. In chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, DNA sequences from Pou5f1 and Gdf9 promoters co-precipitated with anti-NOBOX antibody. These results suggest that NOBOX directly regulates the transcription of Pou5f1 and Gdf9 in oocytes during early folliculogenesis.

Identification of a novel OCT1 binding site that is necessary for the elaboration of pulses of rat GnRH promoter activity

Recent evidence from our laboratory demonstrated that the OCT1 protein was necessary for GnRH gene promoter pulse activity through its interaction with a specific OCT1 binding site (OCT1BS-a, -1,774/-1,781). In light of the importance of this POU homeoprotein in pulsatile function, we focused on two other highly conserved OCT1 sites within this region, OCT1BS-b (-1,694/-1,701, previously AT-b), and OCT1BS-c (-1,569/-1,562). Mutagenesis of these sites revealed that alteration of OCT1BS-c, but not OCT1BS-b, virtually abolished gene expression pulses in GT1-7 cells. EMSAs confirmed that OCT1 can bind to both sites. Taken together, our findings demonstrate clearly that more than one Oct1 binding site is necessary for GnRH promoter pulses. Moreover, the lack of an influence observed with OCT1BS-b on pulse activity indicates that OCT1 action is not general to all OCT1 sites, but specific to certain octamer sequences in the NSE region of the GnRH promoter.

Combinatorial transcription of herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus immediate early genes is strictly determined by the cellular coactivator HCF-1

The mammalian transcriptional coactivator host cell factor-1 (HCF-1) functions in concert with Oct-1 and VP16 to assemble the herpes simplex virus (HSV) immediate early (IE) transcription enhancer core complexes that mediate the high level transcription of these genes upon infection. Although this transcriptional model has been well characterized in vitro, the requirements and significance of the components have not been addressed. Oct-1 was previously determined to be critical but not essential for HSV IE gene expression. In contrast, RNA interference-mediated depletion of HCF-1 resulted in abrogation of HSV IE gene expression. The HSV IE gene enhancer domain is a model of combinatorial transcription and consists of the core enhancer and multiple binding sites for factors such as Sp1 and GA-binding protein. It was striking that HCF-1 was strictly required for VP16-mediated transcriptional induction via the core enhancer as well as for basal level transcription mediated by GA-binding protein and Sp1. HCF-1 was also found to be essential for the induction of varicella zoster virus IE gene expression by ORF10, the VZV ortholog of the HSV IE transactivator VP16, and the autostimulatory IE62 protein. The critical dependence upon HCF-1 demonstrates that this cellular component is a key factor for control of HSV and VZV IE gene expression by functioning as the common element for distinct factors cooperating at the IE gene enhancers. The requirements for this protein supports the model whereby the regulated transport of HCF-1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in sensory neurons may control IE gene expression and reactivation of these viruses from the latent state.

A Protein Sequestering System Reveals Control of Cellular Programs by the Transcriptional Coactivator HCF-1

The mammalian transcriptional coactivator HCF-1 is a critical component of the multiprotein herpes simplex virus immediate early gene enhancer core complex. The protein has also been implicated in basic cellular processes such as cell-cycle progression, transcriptional coactivation, and mRNA processing. Functions have been attributed to HCF-1 primarily from analyses of protein-protein interactions and from the cell-cycle-arrested phenotype of an HCF-1 temperature-sensitive mutant. However, neither the mechanisms involved nor specific cellular transcriptional targets have been identified. As the protein is essential for cell viability and proliferation, a genetic system was developed to specifically sequester the nuclear factor in the cell cytoplasm in a regulated manner. This approach exhibits no significant cell toxicity yet clearly demonstrates the requirement of available nuclear HCF-1 for herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression during productive infection. Additionally, cellular transcriptional events were identified that contribute to understanding the functions ascribed to the protein and implicate the protein in events that impact the regulation of critical cellular processes.

PDX1, a Cellular Homeoprotein, Binds to and Regulates the Activity of Human Cytomegalovirus Immediate Early Promoter

Cellular homeoproteins have been shown to regulate the transcription of several viruses, including herpes simplex viruses, human papillomaviruses, and mouse mammary tumor viruses. Previous studies investigating the anti-viral mechanisms of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors showed that the homeoproteins, pre B-cell leukemia transcription factor 1 (PBX1) and PBX-regulating protein-1 (PREP1), function as transcriptional activators of Moloney murine leukemia virus. Here, we examined the involvement of cellular homeoproteins in regulating the activity of the human cytomegalovirus immediate early (CMV IE) promoter. We identified a 45-bp element located at position -593 to -549 upstream of the transcription start site of the CMV IE gene, which contains multiple putative homeoprotein binding motifs. Gel shift assays demonstrated the physical association between a homeodomain protein, pancreatic-duodenal homeobox factor-1 (PDX1) and the 45-bp cytomegalovirus (CMV) region. We further determined that PDX1 represses the CMV IE promoter activity in 293 cells. Overexpression of PDX1 resulted in a decrease in transcription of the CMV IE gene. Conversely, blocking PDX1 protein synthesis and mutating the PDX1 binding sites enhanced CMV IE-dependent transcription. Collectively, our results represent the first work demonstrating that a cellular homeoprotein, PDX1, may be a repressor involved in regulation of human CMV gene expression.

Herpes simplex virus infections are arrested in Oct-1-deficient cells

Expression of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) immediate early (IE) genes is regulated by a multiprotein complex that is assembled on the TAATGARAT enhancer core element. The complex contains the cellular POU domain protein Oct-1, the viral transactivator VP16, and the cellular cofactor host cell factor 1. The current model suggests that the assembly depends on recognition of the core element by Oct-1. Here, HSV infection of Oct-1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast cells demonstrates that Oct-1 is critical for IE gene expression at low multiplicities of infection (moi). However, the protein is not essential for IE gene expression at high moi, indicating that VP16-mediated transcriptional induction through other IE regulatory elements is also important. This induction depends, at least in part, on the GA-binding protein binding elements that are present in each IE enhancer domain. Surprisingly, whereas the viral IE genes are expressed after high moi infection of Oct-1-deficient cells, the assembly of viral replication factories is severely impaired, revealing a second critical role for Oct-1 in HSV replication. The results have implications for both the HSV lytic and latency-reactivation cycles.

The herpes simplex virus VP16-induced complex: the makings of a regulatory switch

When herpes simplex virus (HSV) infects human cells, it is able to enter two modes of infection: lytic and latent. A key activator of lytic infection is a virion protein called VP16, which, upon infection of a permissive cell, forms a transcriptional regulatory complex with two cellular proteins - the POU-domain transcription factor Oct-1 and the cell-proliferation factor HCF-1 - to activate transcription of the first set of expressed viral genes. This regulatory complex, called the VP16-induced complex, reveals mechanisms of combinatorial control of transcription. The activities of Oct-1 and HCF-1 - two important regulators of cellular gene expression and proliferation - illuminate strategies by which HSV might coexist with its host.

Dominant negative dimerization of a mutant homeodomain protein in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome

Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome is an autosomal-dominant disorder caused by mutations in the PITX2 homeodomain protein. We have studied the mechanism underlying the dominant negative K88E mutation, which occurs at position 50 of the homeodomain. By using yeast two-hybrid and in vitro pulldown assays, we have documented that PITX2a can form homodimers in the absence of DNA. Moreover, the K88E mutant had even stronger dimerization ability, primarily due to interactions involving the C-terminal region. Dimerization allowed cooperative binding of wild-type (WT) PITX2a to DNA containing tandem bicoid sites in a head-to-tail orientation (Hill coefficient, 1.73). In contrast, the WT-K88E heterodimer bound the tandem sites with greatly reduced cooperativity and decreased transactivation activity. To further explore the role of position 50 in PITX2a dimerization, we introduced a charge-conservative mutation of lysine to arginine (K88R). The K88R protein had greatly reduced binding to a TAATCC element and did not specifically bind any other TAATNN motif. Like K88E, K88R formed relatively stronger dimers with WT. As predicted by our model, the K88R protein acted in a dominant negative manner to suppress WT PITX2a activity. These results suggest that the position 50 residue in the PITX2 homeodomain plays an important role in both DNA binding and dimerization activities.

Recruitment of the priming protein pTP and DNA binding occur by overlapping Oct-1 POU homeodomain surfaces

The human transcription factor Oct-1 can stimulate transcription from a variety of promoters by interacting with the coactivators OBF-1/OCA-B/BOB-1, SNAP190 and VP16. These proteins contact Oct-1 regions different from the DNA binding surface. Oct-1 also stimulates the DNA replication of adenovirus through its DNA binding site in the origin. The Oct-1 POU homeodomain (POUhd) binds the adenovirus precursor terminal protein pTP, which serves as the protein primer of DNA replication and recruits pTP to the origin. To map the interaction with pTP at the POUhd surface, we screened a library of randomly mutated POU domains and identified mutations that interfered with pTP interaction and DNA replication stimulation. These mutants clustered at a surface different from those recognized by OBF-1, SNAP190 and VP16. Unexpectedly, the pTP binding region largely overlapped with the DNA binding surface of POUhd. In agreement with this, pTP binding and DNA binding were mutually exclusive. We propose a model to reconcile pTP recruitment and DNA binding by Oct-1.

DNA recognition by the herpes simplex virus transactivator VP16: a novel DNA-binding structure

Upon infection, the herpes simplex virus (HSV) transcriptional activator VP16 directs the formation of a multiprotein-DNA complex-the VP16-induced complex-with two cellular proteins, the host cell factor HCF-1 and the POU domain transcription factor Oct-1, on TAATGARAT-containing sequences found in the promoters of HSV immediate-early genes. HSV VP16 contains carboxy-terminal sequences important for transcriptional activation and a central conserved core that is important for VP16-induced complex assembly. On its own, VP16 displays little, if any, sequence-specific DNA-binding activity. We show here that, within the VP16-induced complex, however, the VP16 core has an important role in DNA binding. Mutation of basic residues on the surface of the VP16 core reveals a novel DNA-binding surface with essential residues which are conserved among VP16 orthologs. These results illuminate how, through association with DNA, VP16 is able to interpret cis-regulatory signals in the DNA to direct the assembly of a multiprotein-DNA transcriptional regulatory complex.

POU domain factors in the neuroendocrine system: lessons from developmental biology provide insights into human disease

POU domain factors are transcriptional regulators characterized by a highly conserved DNA-binding domain referred to as the POU domain. The structure of the POU domain has been solved, facilitating the understanding of how these proteins bind to DNA and regulate transcription via complex protein-protein interactions. Several members of the POU domain family have been implicated in the control of development and function of the neuroendocrine system. Such roles have been most clearly established for Pit-1, which is required for formation of somatotropes, lactotropes, and thyrotropes in the anterior pituitary gland, and for Brn-2, which is critical for formation of magnocellular and parvocellular neurons in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus. While genetic evidence is lacking, molecular biology experiments have implicated several other POU factors in the regulation of gene expression in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Pit-1 mutations in humans cause combined pituitary hormone deficiency similar to that found in mice deleted for the Pit-1 gene, providing a striking example of how basic developmental biology studies have provided important insights into human disease.

Protein interaction surface of the POU transcription factor UNC-86 selectively used in touch neurons

The Caenorhabditis elegans POU protein UNC-86 specifies the HSN motor neurons, which are required for egg-laying, and six mechanosensory neurons. To investigate how UNC-86 controls neuronal specification, we characterized two unc-86 mutants that do not respond to touch but show wild-type egg-laying behavior. Residues P145 and L195, which are altered by these mutations, are located in the POU-specific domain and abolish the physical interaction of UNC-86 with the LIM homeodomain protein, MEC-3. This results in a failure to maintain mec-3 expression and in loss of expression of the mechanosensory neuron-specific gene, mec-2. unc-86-dependent expression of genes in other neurons is not impaired. We conclude that distinct residues in the POU domain of UNC-86 are involved in modulating UNC-86 activity during its specification of different neurons. A structural model of the UNC-86 POU domain, including base pairs and amino acid residues required for MEC-3 interaction, revealed that P145 and L195 are part of a hydrophobic pocket which is similar to the OCA-B-binding domain of the mammalian POU protein, Oct-1.

The novel coactivator C1 (HCF) coordinates multiprotein enhancer formation and mediates transcription activation by GABP

Transcription of the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) immediate early (IE) genes is determined by multiprotein enhancer complexes. The core enhancer assembly requires the interactions of the POU-homeodomain protein Oct-1, the viral transactivator alphaTIF and the cellular factor C1 (HCF). In this context, the C1 factor interacts with each protein to assemble the stable enhancer complex. In addition, the IE enhancer cores contain adjacent binding sites for other cellular transcription factors such as Sp1 and GA-binding protein (GABP). In this study, a direct interaction of the C1 factor with GABP is demonstrated, defining the C1 factor as the critical coordinator of the enhancer complex assembly. In addition, mutations that reduce the GABP transactivation potential also impair the C1-GABP interaction, indicating that the C1 factor functions as a novel coactivator of GABP-mediated transcription. The interaction and coordinated assembly of the enhancer proteins by the C1 factor may be critical for the regulation of the HSV lytic-latent cycle.

Mutations in host cell factor 1 separate its role in cell proliferation from recruitment of VP16 and LZIP

Host cell factor 1 (HCF-1) is a nuclear protein required for progression through G(1) phase of the cell cycle and, via its association with VP16, transcriptional activation of the herpes simplex virus immediate-early genes. Both functions require a six-bladed beta-propeller domain encoded by residues 1 to 380 of HCF-1 as well as an additional amino-terminal region. The beta-propeller domain is well conserved in HCF homologues, consistent with a critical cellular function. To date, the only known cellular target of the beta-propeller is a bZIP transcription factor known as LZIP or Luman. Whether the interaction between HCF-1 and LZIP is required for cell proliferation remains to be determined. In this study, we used directed mutations to show that all six blades of the HCF-1 beta-propeller contribute to VP16-induced complex assembly, association with LZIP, and cell cycle progression. Although LZIP and VP16 share a common tetrapeptide HCF-binding motif, our results reveal profound differences in their interaction with HCF-1. Importantly, with several of the mutants we observe a poor correlation between the ability to associate with LZIP and promote cell proliferation in the context of the full HCF-1 amino terminus, arguing that the HCF-1 beta-propeller domain must target other cellular transcription factors in order to contribute to G(1) progression.

Crystal structure of the conserved core of the herpes simplex virus transcriptional regulatory protein VP16

On infection, the herpes simplex virus (HSV) virion protein VP16 (Vmw65; alphaTIF) forms a transcriptional regulatory complex-the VP16-induced complex-with two cellular proteins, HCF and Oct-1, on VP16-responsive cis-regulatory elements in HSV immediate-early promoters called TAATGARAT. Comparison of different HSV VP16 sequences reveals a conserved core region that is sufficient for VP16-induced complex formation. The crystal structure of the VP16 core has been determined at 2.1 A resolution. The results reveal a novel, seat-like protein structure. Together with the activity of mutant VP16 proteins, the structure of free VP16 suggests that it contains (1) a disordered carboxy-terminal region that associates with HCF, Oct-1, and DNA in the VP16-induced complex, and (2) a structured region involved in virion assembly and possessing a novel DNA-binding surface that differentiates among TAATGARAT VP16-response elements.

Herpes simplex virus transactivator VP16 discriminates between HCF-1 and a novel family member, HCF-2

Herpes simplex virus infection is initiated by VP16, a viral transcription factor that activates the viral immediate-early (IE) genes. VP16 does not recognize the IE gene promoters directly but instead forms a multiprotein complex with Oct-1 and HCF-1, a ubiquitous nuclear protein required for progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The functional significance of recruiting HCF-1 to the VP16-induced complex is not understood. Here we describe the identification of a second HCF-like protein, designated HCF-2. HCF-2 is smaller than HCF-1 but shares three regions of strong amino acid sequence homology, including the beta-propeller domain required for association with VP16. HCF-2 is expressed in many tissues, especially the testis, and shows a more dynamic pattern of subcellular localization than HCF-1. Although HCF-2 associates with VP16 and can support complex assembly with Oct-1 and DNA, it is significantly less efficient than HCF-1. A similar preference is shown by LZIP, a cellular counterpart of VP16. Analysis of chimeric proteins showed that differences between the fifth and sixth kelch repeats of the beta-propeller domains from HCF-1 and HCF-2 dictate this selectivity. These results reveal an unexpected level of specificity in the recruitment of HCF-1 to the VP16-induced complex, paralleling the preferential selection of Oct-1 rather than the closely related POU domain protein Oct-2. Implications for regulation of the viral life cycle are discussed.

A trans-acting peptide activates the yeast a1 repressor by raising its DNA-binding affinity

The cooperative binding of gene regulatory proteins to DNA is a common feature of transcriptional control in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. It is generally viewed as a simple energy coupling, through protein-protein interactions, of two or more DNA-binding proteins. In this paper, we show that the simple view does not account for the cooperative DNA binding of a1 and alpha2, two homeodomain proteins from budding yeast. Rather, we show through the use of chimeric proteins and synthetic peptides that, upon heterodimerization, alpha2 instructs a1 to bind DNA. This change is induced by contact with a peptide contributed by alpha2, and this contact converts a1 from a weak to a strong DNA-binding protein. This explains, in part, how high DNA-binding specificity is achieved only when the two gene regulatory proteins conjoin. We also provide evidence that features of the a1-alpha2 interaction can serve as a model for other examples of protein-protein interactions, including that between the herpes virus transcriptional activator VP16 and the mammalian homeodomain-containing protein Oct-l.

HCF-dependent nuclear import of VP16

Transactivation by VP16 requires the formation of a multicomponent complex, the TAATGAAAT recognition factor complex (TRF.C), that contains in addition to VP16, two cellular proteins, Oct-1 and HCF. HCF binds directly to VP16 and this promotes subsequent interaction of the VP16-HCF complex with the POU DNA-binding domain of Oct-1 and selective assembly onto target sites. Here we demonstrate a novel role of HCF in the intracellular compartmentalization of VP16. We show that while VP16 does not contain a consensus nuclear localization signal (NLS) and is largely cytoplasmic, co-expression with HCF resulted in VP16 nuclear accumulation. A candidate NLS within the C-terminus of HCF was identified and insertion of this motif into green fluorescent protein (GFP) promoted nuclear accumulation. Conversely, removal of this signal from HCF (HCFDeltaNLS) resulted in its cytoplasmic accumulation. Co-expression of HCFDeltaNLS with wild-type (wt) VP16, or of wt HCF with VP16 mutants lacking HCF-binding activity failed to promote the nuclear enrichment of VP16. These results indicate that in addition to its role in stabilizing TRF.C, HCF acts as a nuclear import factor for VP16.

The yeast a1 and alpha2 homeodomain proteins do not contribute equally to heterodimeric DNA binding

In diploid cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the alpha2 and a1 homeodomain proteins bind cooperatively to sites in the promoters of haploid cell-type-specific genes (hsg) to repress their expression. Although both proteins bind to the DNA, in the alpha2 homeodomain substitutions of residues that are involved in contacting the DNA have little or no effect on repression in vivo or cooperative DNA binding with a1 protein in vitro. This result brings up the question of the contribution of each protein in the heterodimer complex to the DNA-binding affinity and specificity. To determine the requirements for the a1-alpha2 homeodomain DNA recognition, we systematically introduced single base-pair substitutions in an a1-alpha2 DNA-binding site and examined their effects on repression in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Our results show that nearly all substitutions that significantly decrease repression and DNA-binding affinity are at positions which are specifically contacted by either the alpha2 or a1 protein. Interestingly, an alpha2 mutant lacking side chains that make base-specific contacts in the major groove is able to discriminate between the wild-type and mutant DNA sites with the same sequence specificity as the wild-type protein. These results suggest that the specificity of alpha2 DNA binding in complex with a1 does not rely solely on the residues that make base-specific contacts. We have also examined the contribution of the a1 homeodomain to the binding affinity and specificity of the complex. In contrast to the lack of a defective phenotype produced by mutations in the alpha2 homeodomain, many of the alanine substitutions of residues in the a1 homeodomain have large effects on a1-alpha2-mediated repression and DNA binding. This result shows that the two proteins do not make equal contributions to the DNA-binding affinity of the complex.

Coactivator OBF-1 makes selective contacts with both the POU-specific domain and the POU homeodomain and acts as a molecular clamp on DNA

The lymphoid-specific transcriptional coactivator OBF-1 (also known as OCA-B or Bob-1) is recruited to octamer site-containing promoters by interacting with Oct-1 or Oct-2 and thereby enhances the transactivation potential of these two Oct factors. For this interaction the POU domain is sufficient. By contrast, OBF-1 does not interact with the POU domains of other POU proteins, such as Oct-4, Oct-6, or Pit-1, even though these factors bind efficiently to the octamer motif. Here we examined the structural requirements for selective interaction between the POU domain and OBF-1. Previous data have shown that formation of a ternary complex among OBF-1, the POU domain, and the DNA is critically dependent on residues within the octamer site. By methylation interference analysis we identified bases that react differently in the presence of OBF-1 compared to the POU domain alone, and using phosphothioate backbone-modified probes in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we identified several positions influencing ternary complex formation. We then used Oct-1/Pit-1 POU domain chimeras to analyze the selectivity of the interaction between OBF-1 and the POU domain. This analysis indicated that both the POU specific domain (POUS) and the POU homeodomain (POUH) contribute to complex formation. Amino acids that are different in the Pit-1 and Oct-1 POU domains and are considered to be solvent accessible based on the Oct-1 POU domain/DNA cocrystal structure were replaced with alanine residues and analyzed for their influence on complex formation. Thereby, we identified residues L6 and E7 in the POUS and residues K155 and I159 in the POUH to be critical in vitro and in vivo for selective interaction with OBF-1. Furthermore, in an in vivo assay we could show that OBF-1 is able to functionally recruit two artificially separated halves of the POU domain to the promoter DNA, thereby leading to transactivation. These data allow us to propose a model of the interaction between OBF-1 and the POU domain, whereby OBF-1 acts as a molecular clamp holding together the two moieties of the POU domain and the DNA.

Coactivation by OCA-B: definition of critical regions and synergism with general cofactors

Molecular dissection of the B-cell-specific transcription coactivator OCA-B has revealed distinct regions important, respectively, for recruitment to immunoglobulin promoters through interaction with octamer-bound Oct-1 and for subsequent coactivator function. Further analysis of general coactivator requirements showed that selective removal of PC4 from the essential USA fraction severely impairs Oct-1 and OCA-B function in a cell-free system reconstituted with partially purified factors. Full activity can be restored by the combined action of recombinant PC4 and the PC4-depleted USA fraction, thus suggesting a joint requirement for PC4 and another, USA-derived component(s) for optimal function of Oct-1/OCA-B in the reconstituted system. Indeed, USA-derived PC2 was found to act synergistically with PC4 in reproducing the function of intact USA in the assay system. Consistent with the requirement for PC4 in the reconstituted system, OCA-B was found to interact directly with PC4. Surprisingly, however, removal of PC4 from the unfractionated nuclear extract has no detrimental effect on OCA-B/Oct-1-dependent transcription. These results lead to a general model for the synergistic function of activation domains in Oct-1 and OCA-B (mediated by the combined action of the multiple USA components) and, further, suggest a functional redundancy in general coactivators.

POU transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b interact with the estrogen receptor and differentially regulate transcriptional activity via an estrogen response element

The estrogen receptor (ER) modulates transcription by forming complexes with other proteins and then binding to the estrogen response element (ERE). We have identified a novel interaction of this receptor with the POU transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b which was independent of ligand binding. By pull-down assays and the yeast two-hybrid system, the POU domain of Brn-3a and Brn-3b was shown to interact with the DNA-binding domain of the ER. Brn-3-ER interactions also affect transcriptional activity of an ERE-containing promoter, such that in estradiol-stimulated cells, Brn-3b strongly activated the promoter via the ERE, while Brn-3a had a mild inhibitory effect. The POU domain of Brn-3b which interacts with the ER was sufficient to confer this activation potential, and the change of a single amino acid in the first helix of the POU homeodomain of Brn-3a to its equivalent in Brn-3b can change the mild repressive effect of Brn-3a to a stimulatory Brn-3b-like effect. These observations and their implications for transcriptional regulation by the ER are discussed.

Viral transactivating proteins

Many viruses utilize the cellular transcription apparatus to express their genomes, and they encode transcriptional regulatory proteins that modulate the process. Here we review the current understanding of three viral regulatory proteins. The adenovirus E1A protein acts within the nucleus to regulate transcription through its ability to bind to other proteins. The herpes simplex type 1 virus VP16 protein acts within the nucleus to control transcription by binding to DNA in conjunction with cellular proteins. The human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein influences transcription through interactions with cellular proteins in the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm.

Concerted activity of host cell factor subregions in promoting stable VP16 complex assembly and preventing interference by the acidic activation domain

In contrast to our understanding of the roles of Oct-1 and VP16 in VP16-mediated transcriptional activation, virtually nothing is known of the role of the second cellular component, termed host cell factor (HCF), or of its structure-function relationships. We show that the majority of the internal region of HCF, including the repeats involved in HCF cleavage, is dispensable for complex assembly with VP16 and Oct-1. The N-terminal domain of HCF (HCF.N) had only weak VP16 binding and complex promoting activity, while the C-terminal region (HCF.C) had no intrinsic activity. However, the C-terminal region strongly enhanced complex formation and reduced dissociation kinetics when linked to the N-terminal domain (HCF.NC). The potent activity of the HCF.NC fusion in complex assembly was recapitulated in vivo in yeast and mammalian cells. Moreover, HCF.N could promote increased complex formation when the acidic activation domain of VP16 was deleted. Restoration of the activation domain strongly inhibited complex formation with HCF.N, but the addition of the C-terminal domain of HCF restored strong stable complex formation with intact VP16. The results indicate that this C-terminal domain is critically required to alter the presentation of the acidic domain of VP16. Additional results are consistent with the interpretation that this alteration in acidic domain presentation for complex assembly also facilitates the activation function in VP16. The sequence of an HCF homolog from Caenorhabditis elegans shows it to be a natural HCF.NC construct, reinforcing the conclusions from our functional analysis.

OCA-B is a functional analog of VP16 but targets a separate surface of the Oct-1 POU domain

OCA-B is a B-cell-specific coregulator of the broadly expressed POU domain transcription factor Oct-1. OCA-B associates with the Oct-1 POU domain, a bipartite DNA-binding structure containing a POU-specific (POU[S]) domain joined by a flexible linker to a POU homeodomain (POU[H]). Here, we show that OCA-B alters the activity of Oct-1 in two ways. It provides a transcriptional activation domain which, unlike Oct-1, activates an mRNA-type promoter effectively, and it stabilizes Oct-1 on the Oct-1-responsive octamer sequence ATGCAAAT. These properties of OCA-B parallel those displayed by the herpes simplex virus Oct-1 coregulator VP16. OCA-B, however, interacts with a different surface of the DNA-bound Oct-1 POU domain, interacting with both the POU(S) and POU(H) domains and the center of the ATGCAAAT octamer sequence. The OCA-B and VP16 interactions with the Oct-1 POU domain are sufficiently different to permit OCA-B and VP16 to bind the Oct-1 POU domain simultaneously. These results emphasize the structural versatility of the Oct-1 POU domain in its interaction with coregulators.

Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites

Octamer binding and Sox factors are thought to play important roles in development by potentiating the transcriptional activation of specific gene subsets. The proteins within these factor families are related by the presence of highly conserved DNA binding domains, the octamer binding protein POU domain or the Sox factors HMG domain. We have previously shown that fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene expression in embryonal carcinoma cells requires a synergistic interaction between Oct-3 and Sox2 on the FGF-4 enhancer. Sox2 and Oct-3 bind to adjacent sites within this enhancer to form a ternary protein-DNA complex (Oct-3*) whose assembly correlates with enhancer activity. We now demonstrate that increasing the distance between the octamer and Sox binding sites by base pair insertion results in a loss of enhancer function. Significantly, those enhancer "spacing mutants" which failed to activate transcription were also compromised in their ability to form the Oct* complexes even though they could still bind both Sox2 and the octamer binding proteins, suggesting that a direct interaction between Sox2 and Oct-3 is necessary for enhancer function. Consistent with this hypothesis, Oct-3 and Sox2 can participate in a direct protein-protein interaction in vitro in the absence of DNA, and both this interaction and assembly of the ternary Oct* complexes require only the octamer protein POU and Sox2 HMG domains. Assembly of the ternary complex by these two protein domains occurs in a cooperative manner on FGF-4 enhancer DNA, and the loss of this cooperative interaction contributes to the defect in Oct-3* formation observed for the enhancer spacing mutants. These observations indicate that Oct-3* assembly results from protein-protein interactions between the domains of Sox2 and Oct-3 that mediate their binding to DNA, but it also requires a specific arrangement of the binding sites within the FGF-4 enhancer DNA. Thus, these results define one parameter that is fundamental to synergistic activation by Sox2 and Oct-3 and further emphasize the critical role of enhancer DNA sequences in the proper assembly of functional activation complexes.

The mouse homologue of the human transcription factor C1 (host cell factor). Conservation of forms and function

The assembly of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) alpha/IE gene enhancer complex is determined by the interactions of the Oct-1 POU domain protein, the viral alphaTIF (alpha-trans-induction factor, VP16, ICP25, VMW65), and the C1 factor (host cell factor, HCF). A unique transcription factor, C1 consists of a family of polypeptides derived from a common precursor by site-specific proteolytic processing. To analyze the role of this factor in the determination of HSV lytic-latent infection, cDNAs and genomic DNAs encoding the mouse homologue have been isolated. This factor is nearly identical to the human protein, contains multiple consensus proteolytic processing sites, and functions efficiently in the assembly of a specific HSV enhancer complex. Interestingly, the differential expression of the C1 factors in both human and mouse tissues may be important for the determination of HSV tissue tropism in these two organisms.

VP16 targets an amino-terminal domain of HCF involved in cell cycle progression

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) regulatory protein VP16 activates HSV immediate-early gene transcription through formation of a multiprotein-DNA complex on viral promoters that includes the preexisting nuclear proteins HCF and Oct-1. The HCF protein is a complex of amino- and carboxy-terminal polypeptides derived from a large (approximately 2,000-amino-acid) precursor by proteolytic processing. Here we show that a 361-residue amino-terminal region of HCF is sufficient to bind VP16, stabilize VP16-induced complex assembly with Oct-1 and DNA, and activate transcription in vivo. This VP16 interaction region contains six kelch-like repeats, a degenerate repeat motif that is likely to fold as a distinctive beta-propeller structure. The third HCF kelch repeat includes a proline residue (P134) that is mutated to serine in hamster tsBN67 cells, resulting in a temperature-sensitive defect in cell proliferation. This missense mutation also prevents direct association between HCF and VP16, suggesting that VP16 mimics a cellular factor required for cell proliferation. Rescue of the tsBN67 cell proliferation defect by HCF, however, requires both the VP16 interaction domain and an adjacent basic region, indicating that HCF utilizes multiple regions to promote cell cycle progression.

The VP16 paradox: herpes simplex virus VP16 contains a long-range activation domain but within the natural multiprotein complex activates only from promoter-proximal positions

Removal of core promoter elements like the TATA box converts several regulatory upstream regions of viral and cellular genes into classical enhancers, i.e., cis-regulatory elements capable of activating transcription over long distances in an orientation-independent manner. This is not the case with herpes simplex virus (HSV) immediate-early gene promoters, which are strongly induced by the viral transactivator VP16 (Vmw65, alphaTIF, ICP25) complexed with the cellular factors Oct-1 and HCF. Here we report that the VP16 complex can readily bring about strong activation from a promoter-proximal position but fails to induce transcription from a distal downstream enhancer position. This is in striking contrast to results obtained with GAL fusion proteins: in this context, the C-terminal "general" activation domain of VP16 activates transcription to high levels over long distances. Thus, this paradoxical behavior suggests that the VP16 activation domain is not accessible to the transcription machinery when the VP16-Oct-1-HCF complex is bound in a remote position. Only upon specific interactions in a promoter-proximal position, perhaps with the basal transcription factors, can transcription be strongly induced. In agreement with such a proposed mechanism, VP16 proteins to which a heterologous general activation domain has been added strongly activate transcription from a downstream position. The biological role of this unexpected and sophisticated mechanism is most probably a limitation of the VP16 activity to the associated immediate-early genes, without undesired long-range effects on other viral promoters within the tightly packed HSV genome.

Interdigitated residues within a small region of VP16 interact with Oct-1, HCF, and DNA

Upon infection, the herpes simplex virus (HSV) activator of immediate-early (IE) gene transcription VP16 forms a multiprotein-DNA complex with two cellular proteins, Oct-1 and HCF. First, VP16 associates with HCF independently of DNA, and this association stimulates subsequent association with Oct-1 on the DNA target of VP16 activation, the TAATGARAT motif found in HSV IE promoters. We have analyzed the involvement of VP16 residues lying near the carboxy-terminal transcriptional activation domain of VP16 in associating with HCF, Oct-1, and DNA. To assay VP16 association with HCF, we developed an electrophoretic mobility retardation assay in which HCF is used to retard the mobility of a hybrid VP16-GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusion protein bound to a GAL4 DNA-binding site. Analysis of an extensive set of individual and combined alanine substitutions over a 61-amino-acid region of VP16 shows that, even within a region as small as 13 amino acids, there are separate residues involved in association with either HCF, DNA, or Oct-1 bound to DNA; indeed, of two immediately adjacent amino acids in VP16, one is important for DNA binding and the other is important for HCF binding. These results suggest that a small region in VP16 is important for linking in close juxtaposition the four components of the VP16-induced complex and support the hypothesis that the structure of the Oct-1-VP16 interaction in this complex is similar to that formed by the yeast transcriptional regulatory proteins MATa1 and MAT alpha2. We propose that HCF stabilizes this Oct-1-VP16 interaction.

Differential in vivo activation of the class II and class III snRNA genes by the POU-specific domain of Oct-1

Many snRNA genes contain binding sites for the ubiquitous transcription factor Oct-1. In vitro studies have shown that this factor potentiates binding of an essential transcription factor (PTF) to the proximal sequence element (PSE) of snRNA genes, and activates transcription. Using Gal4 fusion proteins, I show here that the POU-specific region of the DNA-binding domain of Oct-1 is sufficient both to potentiate PTF binding in vitro and to transactivate pol II- and pol III-dependent snRNA genes in vivo . A single amino acid change in this domain abrogates both activation and interaction with PTF. The N- and C-terminal regions of Oct-1 also activate transcription of both classes of snRNA genes. Wild-type levels of Pol II-dependent U2 expression require all activation domains, whereas efficient activation of the pol III-dependent 7SK and U6 genes is effected by the POU-specific domain alone. These results indicate that contacts between PTF and amino acids in the POU-specific domain of Oct-1 are critical for efficient transactivation of snRNA genes in vivo. The POU-specific domain of Oct-2A also activates these genes, but the N- and C-terminal domains are relatively inactive.

A single serine residue at position 375 of VP16 is critical for complex assembly with Oct-1 and HCF and is a target of phosphorylation by casein kinase II

We show that VP16 is phosphorylated by cellular kinases in vivo and in vitro and map the major sites of phosphorylation to be on serines towards the C-terminus, downstream of position 370 in both cases. Deletion of the acidic activation domain had no effect on phosphorylation, refining the sites to between position 370 and 411. Within VP16, the C-terminal boundary for complex formation with Oct-1 and HCF lies at position 388, and between 370 and 388 lies one serine, at position 375. This is a consensus casein kinase II (CKII) site and, using purified wild-type and mutant proteins, we show that it is the main CKII site in the body of the N-terminal complex-forming region. This site is also phosphorylated in nuclear extracts. Although other sites, mainly Ser411, are also phosphorylated by nuclear kinase(s), the single substitution of Ser375 to alanine abolishes CKII phosphorylation in vitro and virtually eliminates complex formation. This serine lies in a surface-exposed region of VP16 and, although complex formation is disrupted, other activities of the mutant are unaffected. Ser375 is also required in vivo where substitution to alanine abolishes transactivation, while replacement with threonine restores normal levels of activity.

Linker length and composition influence the flexibility of Oct-1 DNA binding

POU domain transcription factors have two separate helix-turn-helix DNA-binding subdomains, the POU homeodomain (POUhd) and the POU-specific domain (POUs). Each subdomain recognizes a specific subsite of 4 or 5 bp in the octamer recognition sequence. The Oct-1 POU subdomains are connected by a 23 amino acid unstructured linker region. To investigate the requirements for the linker and its role in DNA recognition, we constructed POU domains in which the subdomains are connected with linkers varying in length between 2 and 37 amino acids. Binding to the natural octamer site required a minimal linker length of between 10 and 14 amino acids. A POU domain with an eight amino acid linker, however, had a high affinity for a site in which the POUs recognition sequence was inverted. Computer modelling shows that inversion of the POUs subdomain shortens the distance between the subdomains sufficiently to enable an eight amino acid linker to bridge the distance. DNase I footprinting as well as mutation of the POUs-binding site confirms the inverted orientation of the POUs domain. Switching of the POUs and POUhd subdomains and separation by 3 bp leads to a large distance which could only be bridged effectively by a long 37 amino acid linker. In addition to linker length, mutation of a conserved glutamate residue in the linker affected binding. As shown by surface plasmon resonance measurements, this was caused by a decrease in the on-rate. Our data indicate that there are both length and sequence requirements in the linker region which allow flexibility leading to selective binding to differently spaced and oriented subsites.

Transcription factor genes and the developing eye: a genetic perspective

We review the current knowledge of transcription factors in mammallan eye development. The 14 transcription factors presently known to be required for eye formation are examined in some detail, incorporating data from both humans and rodents. Aspects of the biochemistry, expression patterns, genetics, mutant phenotypes, and biological insights acquired from the examination of loss-of-function mutations are summarized. The other 32 tissue-restricted transcription factors that are currently known to be expressed in the developing or mature mammallan eye are tabulated, together with the timing and site of their ocular expression; the requirement for most of these genes in the eye is unknown. Contributions to mammallan eye development from the study of the genetics of the Drosophila eye are discussed briefly. Identification of the entire cohort of transcription factors required for eye development is an essential first step towards understanding the mechanisms underlying eye morphogenesis and differentiation, and the molecular basis of inherited eye abnormalities in humans.

Homeodomain interaction with the beta subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIE

Homeodomain-containing proteins play a crucial role as transcriptional regulators in the process of cell differentiation. The homeodomain performs a dual function in this regard, acting as a DNA binding domain and participating in protein-protein interactions that enhance DNA binding specificity or regulatory activity. Here we describe a homeodomain class-specific interaction with the beta subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIE. We show that the Antennapedia and Abdominal-B homeodomains bind to TFIIEbeta, but the even-skipped homeodomain does not. Using a two-hybrid assay performed in cultured cells, we demonstrate that the homeodomain-TFIIEbeta interaction occurs in vivo. The Abdominal-B homeodomain is shown to activate transcription in vitro, and this activation can be blocked with anti-TFIIEbeta antibody without affecting basal transcription levels. Together with published data demonstrating an interaction between proteins containing even-skipped class homeodomains and the TATA-binding protein (Um, M., Li, C., and Manley, J. L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5007-5016; Zhang, H., Catron, K. M., and Abate-Shen, C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1764-1769), these results suggest various homeodomain containing proteins interact with different general transcription factors, an observation that may have important implications for transcriptional regulation.

Sequence-specific DNA binding of the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B

B-cell-specific transcription of immunoglobulin genes is mediated by the interaction of a POU domain containing transcription factor Oct-1 or Oct-2, with the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B (Bob-1, OBF-1) and a prototype octamer element. We find that OCA-B binds DNA directly in the major groove between the two subdomains of the POU domain, requiring both an A at the fifth position of the octamer element and contact with the POU domain. An amino-terminal fragment of OCA-B binds the octamer site in the absence of a POU domain with the same sequence specificity. Coactivator OCA-B may undergo a POU-dependent conformational change that exposes its amino terminus, allowing it to recognize specific DNA sequences in the major groove within the binding site for Oct-1 or Oct-2. The recognition of both the POU domain and the octamer sequence by OCA-B provides a mechanism for differential regulation of octamer sites containing genes by the ubiquitous factor Oct-1.

Identification of the nuclear localization signal of the POU domain protein Tst-1/Oct6

POU domain proteins are important regulators of development and terminal differentiation based upon their transcriptional activity in the nucleus. Here, we analyzed the mechanism underlying the nuclear localization of Tst-1/Oct6, a member of this family that regulates events during neurogenesis and myelination. Nuclear localization of Tst-1/Oct6 was dependent on the POU domain, as its deletion prevented access to the nucleus, whereas its transfer to the amino terminus of beta-galactosidase was sufficient to prompt nuclear accumulation of this normally cytosolic protein. Interestingly, nuclear localization and high affinity DNA binding were two independent functions of the POU domain and could be separated in several mutants. While specific high affinity binding to DNA required the presence of both the POU-specific and the POU homeodomain, the POU-specific domain was dispensable for nuclear localization of Tst-1/Oct6. Rather, the nuclear localization function was selectively contained within the POU homeodomain. Specifically, a basic cluster (GRKRKKRT) preceding helix 1 of the homeodomain was shown by deletion mutagenesis to be involved in the nuclear localization of Tst-1/Oct6. This sequence, which is highly conserved among POU domain proteins, was by itself capable of translocating beta-galactosidase to the nucleus defining it as the bona fide nuclear localization signal of Tst-1/Oct6 and presumably other POU domain factors.

Differential control of transcription by homologous homeodomain coregulators

The human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) transactivator VP16 and its homolog from bovine herpes-virus 1 (BHV-1) can each recruit the human homeodomain protein Oct-1 into a transcriptional regulatory complex. Here, we show that these two Oct-1 coregulators possess similar, if not identical, homeodomain recognition properties but possess different virus-specific cis-regulatory specificities: the HSV-1 VP-16 protein activates transcription from the HSV-1 VP16 response element, and the BHV-1 VP16 protein activates transcription from the BHV-1 VP16 response element. A distinct 3-bp segment, the D segment, lying 3' of the canonical TAATGARAT motif (where R is a purine) in the VP16 response element is responsible for the differential cis element recognition and transcriptional activation by these two homeodomain coregulators. These results demonstrate how a single homeodomain protein can direct differential transcriptional regulation by selective association with homologous homeodomain coregulators.

A single amino acid change converts an inhibitory transcription factor into an activator

The closely related POU family transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b differ in their functional activity with Brn-3a activating several target promoters, which are repressed by Brn-3b. Brn-3b also prevents promoter activation by Brn-3a. Here we have altered a single isoleucine residue in the POU homeodomain of Brn-3b to the valine residue found at the equivalent position in Brn-3a. This change not only abolishes the ability of Brn-3b to repress basal and Brn-3a-stimulated promoter activity but also converts it to an activator of similar potency to Brn-3a. Hence a single amino acid difference determines the difference between an activator and a repressor in the Brn-3 family.

The Oct-1 POU-specific domain can stimulate small nuclear RNA gene transcription by stabilizing the basal transcription complex SNAPc

The RNA polymerase II and III human small nuclear RNA promoters have a common basal element, the proximal sequence element, which binds the TATA box-binding protein-containing complex SNAPc. They also contain an enhancer characterized by a highly conserved octamer sequence, which constitutes a binding site for the broadly expressed POU domain transcription factor Oct-1. The POU domain is a bipartite DNA-binding domain consisting of a POU-homeo (POUH) domain and a POU-specific (POUs) domain joined by a flexible linker. Here, we show that the Oct-1 POU domain but not the related Pit-1 POU domain can facilitate the binding of SNAPc to the proximal sequence element, and activate transcription. The effect is probably mediated by protein-protein contacts, and 1 of 30 amino acid differences between the Oct-1 and Pit-1 POUs domains is the key determinant for the differential interaction with SNAPc and the ability to activate transcription. These results show that a function that is the hallmark of activation domains, namely, recruitment of a basal transcription complex resulting in activation of transcription, can be performed by a DNA-binding domain. In this case, subtle changes between activator DNA-binding domains, as subtle as a single amino acid difference, can profoundly affect interaction with the basal transcription machinery.

Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy

This study examines the biochemical properties of two members of the murine MSX family, MSX-1 and MSX-2, which have been implicated to have partially overlapping functions during embryogenesis. Our analyses show that MSX-1 and MSX-2 share many features in common including their DNA binding and transcriptional properties. In particular, MSX-1 and MSX-2 interact with a common consensus DNA site, and exhibit similar DNA binding site preferences. However, MSX-2 has a higher apparent affinity for DNA, and the distinction between MSX-1 and MSX-2 resides in their differing sequences N-terminal to the homeodomain. With respect to their transcriptional properties, both MSX-1 and MSX-2 function as repressors and share the distinct property that they do so independently of their consensus DNA binding sites. However, MSX-1 is a more potent repressor, and the difference between these proteins also maps to their N-terminal regions. Similarly, the expression patterns of Msx-1 and Msx-2 as examined by whole mount in situ hybridization are related but not identical. Thus, Msx-1 and Msx-2 are co-expressed in the limbs, neural tube, and branchial arches; however, Msx-1 has a broader expression pattern overall and is expressed uniquely in certain embryonic regions. These features suggest that these members of the Msx family are 'equivalent but not equal' and that their proposed redundancy may be achieved via distinct biochemical mechanisms that yield a similar functional outcome.