Dissociation between complete hippocampal context memory formation and context fear acquisition

Engram Size Varies with Learning and Reflects Memory Content and Precision

Memories are rarely acquired under ideal conditions, rendering them vulnerable to profound omissions, errors, and ambiguities. Consistent with this, recent work using context fear conditioning has shown that memories formed after inadequate learning time display a variety of maladaptive properties, including overgeneralization to similar contexts. However, the neuronal basis of such poor learning and memory imprecision remains unknown. Using c-fos to track neuronal activity in male mice, we examined how these learning-dependent changes in context fear memory precision are encoded in hippocampal ensembles. We found that the total number of c-fos-encoding cells did not correspond with learning history but instead more closely reflected the length of the session immediately preceding c-fos measurement. However, using a c-fos-driven tagging method (TRAP2 mouse line), we found that the degree of learning and memory specificity corresponded with neuronal activity in a subset of dentate gyrus cells that were active during both learning and recall. Comprehensive memories acquired after longer learning intervals were associated with more double-labeled cells. These were preferentially reactivated in the conditioning context compared with a similar context, paralleling behavioral discrimination. Conversely, impoverished memories acquired after shorter learning intervals were associated with fewer double-labeled cells. These were reactivated equally in both contexts, corresponding with overgeneralization. Together, these findings provide two surprising conclusions. First, engram size varies with learning. Second, larger engrams support better neuronal and behavioral discrimination. These findings are incorporated into a model that describes how neuronal activity is influenced by previous learning and present experience, thus driving behavior.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Memories are not always formed under ideal circumstances. This is especially true in traumatic situations, such as car accidents, where individuals have insufficient time to process what happened around them. Such memories have the potential to overgeneralize to irrelevant situations, producing inappropriate fear and contributing to disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder. However, it is unknown how such poorly formed fear memories are encoded within the brain. We find that restricting learning time results in fear memories that are encoded by fewer hippocampal cells. Moreover, these fewer cells are inappropriately reactivated in both dangerous and safe contexts. These findings suggest that fear memories formed at brief periods overgeneralize because they lack the detail-rich information necessary to support neuronal discrimination.

Extinction and discrimination in a Bayesian model of context fear conditioning (BaconX)

The extinction of contextual fear is commonly an essential requirement for successful exposure therapy for fear disorders. However, experimental work on extinction of contextual fear is limited, and there little or no directly relevant theoretical work. Here, we extend BACON, a neurocomputational model of context fear conditioning that provides plausible explanations for a number of aspects of context fear conditioning, to deal with extinction (calling the model BaconX). In this model, contextual representations are formed in the hippocampus and association of fear to them occurs in the amygdala. Representation creation, conditionability, and development of between‐session extinction are controlled by degree of confidence (assessed by the Bayesian weight of evidence) that an active contextual representation is in fact that of the current context (i.e., is “valid”). The model predicts that: (1) extinction which persists between sessions will occur only if at a sessions end there is high confidence that the active representation is valid. It follows that the shorter the context placement‐to‐US (shock) interval (“PSI”) and the less is therefore learned about context, the longer extinction sessions must be for enduring extinction to occur, while too short PSIs will preclude successful extinction. (2) Short‐PSI deficits can be rescued by contextual exposure even after conditioning has occurred. (3) Learning to discriminate well between a conditioned and similar safe context requires representations of each to form, which may not occur if PSI was too short. (4) Extinction‐causing inhibition must be applied downstream of the conditioning locus for reasonable generalization properties to be generated. (5) Context change tends to cause return of extinguished contextual fear. (6). Extinction carried out in the conditioning context generalizes better than extinction executed in contexts to which fear has generalized (as done in exposure therapy). (7) BaconX suggests novel approaches to exposure therapy.

Contextual processing elicits sex differences in dorsal hippocampus activation following footshock and context fear retrieval

Establishing a contextual representation of an environment places specific spatial-temporal processing demands on the mammalian hippocampus, a region showing sex-differences in processing capabilities. However, evidence for sex differences in these processing demands during contextual fear learning remains limited. Here, we examined the relationship among contextual processing, timing of footshock, and activation of the dorsal hippocampus and basolateral amygdalar nuclei (BLA) in male and female mice (C57Bl/6 J). We modified the initial exposure time to the conditioning context prior to administration, or not, of a single footshock. We then quantified Fos- ir neurons activated by acquisition or retrieval of contextual fear memories in the rostral half of the dorsal CA1 (proximal - distal regions), CA3, Dentate Gyrus and basolateral amygdalar nuclei corresponding to atlas levels of the Allen Reference Atlas. In experiment 1, we found that sex differences in context elicited freezing were evident at the longest context placement-to-shock interval and that context fear retrieval with increasing contextual exposure periods increased CA1 Fos-ir in males, but not females. In experiment 2, we observed that an aversive footshock in males potentiated CA1 activation, while it downregulated CA1 activation in females. We also found that an aversive footshock independent of sex moderated Dentate Gyrus activation that normally showed increased activation with greater context exposure periods. Lastly, we identified a heightened responsiveness in BLA neurons to both footshock and length of context exposure in females compared to males. Overall, our findings suggest that sex differences in contextual fear conditioning may arise from marked sex differences in the contextual processing demands of the dorsal hippocampus subfields largely modulated by aversive outcomes.