Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review

Patient Perspectives on Outpatient versus Inpatient Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor

OBJECTIVE

 Our objective was to compare patient perceived control and experience with outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening.

STUDY DESIGN

 This is a retrospective mixed-methods analysis of a quality improvement initiative focused on the impact to patients of incorporating outpatient cervical ripening into routine practice. Postpartum inpatients who had elected for outpatient cervical ripening (outpatients) and those who met criteria for outpatient cervical ripening but opted for an inpatient setting (inpatients) were invited to participate in the study. Patients completed the Perceived Control in Childbirth Scale, and scores were compared between outpatient and inpatient groups using Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, semistructured questions elicited feedback prior to hospital discharge, and these qualitative data were analyzed using iterative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

 The study population consisted of 36 outpatients and 38 inpatients. The median score on the Perceived Control in Childbirth Scale was 69 for outpatients and 67 for inpatients (p-value = 0.49), out of a maximum score of 72 (representing the highest level of perceived control). Both groups reported similarly high levels of perceived control, regardless of cervical ripening setting. In the qualitative analysis, pain was the most common theme in both groups. Inpatients reported more distress despite access to stronger pain medications. Outpatients utilized a variety of distraction techniques and expressed gratitude for their setting more than inpatients.

CONCLUSION

 Outpatient cervical ripening can be a patient-centered solution to obstetric throughput challenges arising from increased numbers of inductions. Those who underwent outpatient cervical ripening had similar perceived control to those who underwent inpatient cervical ripening, suggesting that individual patient preferences are most important in determining the optimal setting for care. The patients' reported experiences identified focus areas for process improvement efforts and future research, including improving patient education regarding expectations and innovating new pain management strategies for cervical ripening.

KEY POINTS

· Patient experiences must inform patient-centered care.. · Perceived control with cervical ripening was high.. · Pain with cervical ripening was the most cited theme..

Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 hours after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of multiparas: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Vaginal examination to monitor labor progress is recommended at least every 4 hours, but it can cause pain and embarrassment to women. Trial data are limited on the best intensity for vaginal examination. Vaginal examination is not needed for oxytocin dose titration after an amniotomy has been performed and oxytocin infusion started. The Foley balloon commonly ripens the cervix without strong contractions. Amniotomy and oxytocin infusion are usually required to drive labor.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the first vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 hours after amniotomy-oxytocin after Foley ripening in multiparous labor induction.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Multiparas at term were recruited at admission for labor induction. Participants were randomized to a first routine vaginal examination at 8 or 4 hours after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to initiate contractions. The 2 primary outcomes were the time from amniotomy to delivery (noninferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction (superiority hypothesis). Data were analyzed using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test (or Fisher exact test), as suitable for the data.

RESULTS

A total of 204 women were randomized, 102 to each arm. Amniotomy to birth intervals were 4.97±2.47 hours in the 8-hour arm and 5.79±3.17 hours in the 4-hour arm (mean difference, -0.82; 97.5% confidence interval, -1.72 to 0.08; P=.041; Bonferroni correction), which were noninferior within the prespecified 2-hour upper margin, and the maternal satisfaction scores (11-point 0-10 numerical rating scale) with allocated labor care were 9 (interquartile range, 8-9) in the 8-hour arm and 8 (interquartile range, 7-9) in the 4-hour arm (P=.814). In addition, oxytocin infusion to birth interval difference was noninferior within the 97.5% confidence interval (-1.59 to 0.23) margin of 1.3 hours. Of the maternal outcomes, the amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals were 3.9±1.8 hours in the 8-hour arm and 3.4±1.3 hours in the 4-hour arm (P=.026), and the numbers of vaginal examinations were 2.00 (interquartile range, 2.00-3.00) in the 8-hour arm and 3.00 (interquratile range, 2.00-3.25) in the 4-hour arm (P<.001). For the 8-hour arm, the first vaginal examination was less likely to be as scheduled and more likely to be indicated by sensation to bear down (P<.001), and the epidural analgesia rates were lower (13/102 participants [12.7%] in the 8-hour arm vs 28/102 participants [27.5%] in the 4-hour arm; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.84; P=.009). Other outcomes of the mode of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and delivery blood loss were not different. Neonatal outcomes were not different.

CONCLUSION

Routine first vaginal examination at 8 hours compared with that at 4 hours was noninferior for the time to birth but did not improve maternal satisfaction.

Two different regimens of outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate expectant compared to immediate return to hospital upon outpatient Foley catheter expulsion predicated on maternal satisfaction and amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval.

METHODS

This randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in Malaysia from September 2020 to February 2022. A total of 330 nulliparous women at term with unripe cervices (Bishop score ≤5), singleton viable fetus in cephalic presentation, reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing and intact membranes who underwent planned outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor (IOL) were included. Women were randomized to expectant or immediate return to hospital if the Foley was spontaneously expelled at home before their scheduled hospital admission the following day. Primary outcomes were amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction on the induction process (assessed by 0-10 visual numerical rating scale [VNRS]).

RESULTS

Amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval was 8.7 ± 4.1 versus 8.9 ± 3.9 h, P = 0.605 (mean difference - 0.228 95% CI: -1.1 to +0.6 h) and maternal satisfaction VNRS score was median (interquartile range) 8 (7-9) versus 8 (7-9), P = 0.782. Early return to hospital rates were 37/165 (22.4%) versus 72/165 (43.6%), RR 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37-0.72), P ≤ 0.001, Cesarean delivery rates were 80/165 (48.5%) versus 80/165 (48.5%), RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.80-1.25), P = 1.00 and duration of hospital stay was 54.4 ± 22.9 versus 56.7 ± 22.8 h, P = 0.364 for the expectant versus immediate return groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

In outpatient Foley catheter IOL, expectant compared to immediate return to hospital following Foley dislodgement results in similarly high maternal satisfaction. The amniotomy-titrated oxytocin to delivery duration is non-inferior with expectant management.

Outpatient cervical ripening and labor induction with low-dose vaginal misoprostol reduces the interval to delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of various outpatient cervical ripening methods. However, the method with the highest efficacy and safety profile has not been determined conclusively. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening methods currently employed in the outpatient setting.

DATA SOURCES

With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian, we performed a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to January 14, 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials comparing a variety of methods for outpatient cervical ripening.

METHODS

We conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis employing data from randomized controlled trials. We performed a direct, pairwise meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various outpatient cervical ripening methods, including placebo. We employed ranking strategies to determine the most efficacious method using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve; a higher surface under the cumulative ranking curve value implied a more efficacious method. We assessed the following outcomes: time from intervention to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, changes in the Bishop score, need for additional ripening methods, incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, and uterine hyperstimulation.

RESULTS

We included data from 42 randomized controlled trials including 6093 participants. When assessing the efficacy of all methods, 25 μg vaginal misoprostol was the most efficacious in reducing the time from intervention to delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 1.0) without increasing the odds of cesarean delivery, the need for additional ripening methods, the incidence of a low Apgar score, or uterine hyperstimulation. Acupressure (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.3) and primrose oil (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.2) were the least effective methods in reducing the time to delivery interval. Among effective methods, 50 mg oral mifepristone was associated with the lowest odds of cesarean delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9).

CONCLUSION

When balancing efficacy and safety, vaginal misoprostol 25 μg represents the best method for outpatient cervical ripening.

Accidental rupture of membranes and neonatal infection after labor induction with silicone or latex balloon catheters: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE(S)

Accidental rupture of membranes (acROM), an insertion-related complication of the balloon catheter for labor induction, may prolong the duration of ruptured membranes. Prolonged rupture of membranes is associated with an increased risk of intra-uterine infection with possibly neonatal infection as result. Little is known about safety profiles of different catheters regarding the occurrence of these complications. This study compares the incidence of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) and acROM in women receiving either silicone or latex balloon catheters.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed including 2200 women (silicone balloon catheter, n = 1100 vs. latex balloon catheter, n = 1100). The primary outcomes were the incidence of acROM, and suspected and proven neonatal EOS. Secondary outcomes were: prolonged rupture of membranes, intrapartum fever, pre- or postnatal neonatal exposure to antibiotics, and perinatal outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed between women with and without acROM.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference with regard to suspected or proven EOS was seen between the silicone and latex groups. The acROM rate was significantly higher in the silicone group compared to the latex group (2.9 % and 0.3 %, p < 0.01). Prolonged rupture of membranes was significantly more common in the silicone group compared to the latex group (5.0 % and 2.4 %, p < 0.01), as was the use of intrapartum antibiotics (12.7 % and 9.6 %, p = 0.02). Neonates were significantly more often exposed to pre- or postnatal antibiotics in the silicone group compared to the latex group (17.6 % and 13.6 %, p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed significantly more suspected and proven neonatal EOS when catheter-insertion was complicated with acROM (11.4 % and 20.0 %), compared to cases without acROM (3.8 % and 2.5 %), irrespective of the type of catheter used.

CONCLUSION(S)

The use of silicone balloon catheters for labor induction results in higher rates of acROM, prolonged rupture of membranes and use of intrapartum antibiotics, compared to latex balloon catheters. No statistically significant differences were found in the occurrence of suspected or proven neonatal EOS, however neonates from the silicone group were more often exposed to pre- or postnatal antibiotics. When acROM occurs, irrespective of type of catheter used, suspected and proven neonatal EOS was seen more often.

Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Compared with a planned 12-hour placement of a double-balloon catheter, a planned 6-hour placement of a double-balloon catheter shortens the labor induction to delivery interval. The Foley catheter is low cost. Moreover, it has at least comparable effectiveness to the proprietary double-balloon labor induction devices. Of note, a 6-hour placement of a Foley balloon catheter in nulliparas has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate 6- vs 12-hour Foley balloon placement for cervical ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Universiti Malaya Medical Centre from January 2022 to August 2022. Nulliparas aged ≥18 years, with a term, singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, with reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, with an unripe cervix, and without any significant contractions, were recruited at admission for labor induction. Participants were randomized after successful Foley balloon insertion, for the balloon to be left passively in place for 6 or 12 hours and then removed to check for a ripened cervix. Amniotomy was performed once the cervix had ripened, followed by titrated oxytocin infusion to expedite labor and delivery. The primary outcome was the labor induction to delivery interval. The secondary outcomes were mostly from the core outcome set for trials on labor induction of labor trial reporting, such as change in the Bishop score after the intervention, use of an additional method for cervical ripening, time to delivery after double-balloon device removal, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean delivery, duration of oxytocin infusion, blood loss during delivery, presence of a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal infection, maternal satisfaction regional analgesia in labor, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, cardiorespiratory arrest, need for hysterectomy. The neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission, cord pH, neonatal sepsis, fetal birthweight, birth trauma, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or need for therapeutic hypothermia. Data were analyzed using the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate for the data type.

RESULTS

Overall, 240 women were randomized, 120 to each arm. The median labor induction to delivery intervals were 21.3 hours (interquartile range, 16.2-27.9) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 26.0 hours (interquartile range, 21.5-30.9) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (P<.001). Of the secondary outcomes, for 6- vs 12-hour balloon catheter placement, the sequential use of additional cervical ripening agent (mostly Foley reinsertion) was 33 of 119 (27.5%) vs 17 of 120 (14.2%) (relative risk, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.29; P=.011), Bishop score increase was 3 (interquartile range, 2.00-3.75) vs 3 (2.25-4.00) (P=.002), and the rate of recommendation to a friend was 83 of 118 (70.3%) vs 101 of 119 (84.9%) (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval; 0.72-0.95; P=.007), respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 52 of 119 (43.7%) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 64 of 120 (53.3%) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (relative risk, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.07; P=.136), and maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) were 7 (interquartile range, 6-9) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 7 (interquartile range, 7-9) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (P=.880).

CONCLUSION

Compared with a planned 12-hour Foley balloon catheter placement, a planned 6-hour Foley balloon placement shortens the time to birth, despite less cervical ripening at Foley balloon catheter removal and more additional cervical ripening agent use. However, the 6-hour balloon catheter placement was less likely to be recommended to a friend than the 12-hour balloon catheter placement.

Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Planned 6- vs 12-hour placement of the double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in labor induction hastens delivery. The Foley catheter is low-priced and typically performs at least as well as the proprietary double-balloon devices in labor induction. Maternal satisfaction with labor induction is usually inversely related to the speed of the process.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare Foley balloon placement for 6 vs 12 hours in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January to October of 2022. Eligible multiparous women admitted for induction of labor for various indications were enrolled. Participant inclusion criteria were multiparity (at least 1 previous vaginal delivery of ≥24 weeks' gestation), age ≥18 years, term pregnancy >37 weeks' gestation, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, normal fetal heart rate tracing, no significant contractions (< 2 in 10 minutes), and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6). Participants were randomized after successful Foley balloon insertion for the balloon to be left in place for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before removal to check cervical suitability for amniotomy. The primary outcomes were the induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction with the allocated intervention assessed using a visual numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were derived in part from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). Maternal outcomes were change in first Bishop score after intervention, use of additional method for cervical ripening, time to delivery after balloon removal, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean delivery, duration of oxytocin infusion, blood loss during delivery, presence of third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal infection, use of regional analgesia in labor, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, cardiorespiratory arrest, and need for hysterectomy. The secondary neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, cord blood pH, neonatal sepsis, birthweight, birth trauma, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or need for therapeutic hypothermia. Analyses were conducted with the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 220 women were randomized (110 to each intervention). Regarding the 2 primary outcomes, the induction-to-delivery intervals were a median (interquartile range) of 15.9 (12.0-24.0) and 21.6 (17.3-26.0) hours (P<.001), and maternal satisfaction scores were 7 (6-8) and 7 (6-8) (P=.734) for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively. The following rates were observed for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively: sequential use of additional cervical ripening agent (Foley reinsertion)-29 per 110 (26.4%) and 13 per 110 (11.8%) (relative risk, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-4.10; P=.006); spontaneous balloon expulsion-22 per 110 (20.0%) and 37 per 110 (33.6%) (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.94; P=.022); and recommendation of the allocated intervention to a friend-61 per 110 (73.6%) and 87 per 110 (79.1%) (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.08; P=.341). Other secondary outcomes, including cesarean delivery, were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Foley balloon placement for 6 hours for cervical ripening in parous women hastens birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction relative to 12-hour placement. Foley reinsertion for additional ripening was more frequent in the 6-hour group.

Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unripe cervices is a high-risk process, carrying an increased risk of uterine rupture and the need for cesarean delivery. Balloon ripening is often chosen as prostaglandin use is associated with an appreciable risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. A shorter duration of placement of the balloon typically expedites delivery; however, this has not been evaluated in induction of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in induction of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January 2022 to February 2023. Eligible women with 1 previous cesarean delivery admitted for induction of labor were enrolled. Participants were randomized after balloon catheter insertion for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before balloon deflation and removal to check cervical status for amniotomy. The primary outcome was the induction of labor to delivery interval. The secondary outcomes were largely derived from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). The Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used as appropriate for the data.

RESULTS

Overall, 126 women were randomized, 63 to each intervention. The mean induction of labor to delivery intervals were 23.0 (standard deviation, ±8.9) in the 6-hour arm and 26.6 (standard deviation, ±7.1) in the 12-hour arm (mean difference, -3.5 hours; 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to -0.7; P=.02). The median induction of labor (Foley balloon catheter insertion) to Foley balloon catheter removal intervals were 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 6.0-6.3) in the 6-hour arm and 12.0 hours (interquartile range, 12.0-12.5) in the 12-hour arm (P<.001). The median induction of labor to amniotomy intervals were 14.1 hours (interquartile range, 9.3-21.8) in the 6-hour arm and 19.0 hours (interquartile range, 15.9-22.0) in the 12-hour arm (P=.02). The usage rates of epidural analgesia in labor were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 65.1% (41/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.98; P=.03). Spontaneous balloon catheter expulsion rates were 22.2% (14/63) in the 6-hour arm and 17.5% (11/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.58; P=.50), and additional ripening use rates (Foley reinsertion) were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 31.7% (20/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-2.27; P=.10). The results were not different. Moreover, maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) of 9 (range, 8-10) in the 6-hour arm and 9 (range, 8-10) in the 12-hour arm (P=.41) were not different. Other secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different either.

CONCLUSION

Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 hours hastened birth and reduced epidural analgesia use in labor without a change in maternal satisfaction.

Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor is a common intervention in obstetrics worldwide. Foley catheter is a commonly used mechanical method for labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at term. We hypothesize that a higher volume of Foley catheter (80 mL vs 60 mL) will shorten the induction-delivery interval for labor induction in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix with simultaneous use of vaginal misoprostol.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcervical Foley catheter (80 mL vs 60 mL) with simultaneous use of vaginal misoprostol on the induction-delivery interval in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix for induction of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial, nulliparous women with a term singleton gestation with unfavorable cervix were randomized to either group 1 (Foley catheter [80 mL] simultaneously with vaginal misoprostol 25 µg every 4h) or group 2 (Foley catheter [60 mL] with vaginal misoprostol 25 µg every 4h). The primary outcome was induction-delivery interval. Secondary outcomes were duration of the latent phase of labor, number of doses of vaginal misoprostol required, mode of delivery, as well as maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat method. A sample size of 100 women per group (N=200) was selected.

RESULTS

Between September 2021 to September 2022, 200 nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix were randomized to labor induction with either FC (80 mL vs 60 mL) and vaginal misoprostol. Induction delivery interval (in minutes) was statistically significantly shorter in Foley catheter (80 mL) (median [interquartile range], 604 [524-719] vs 846 [596-990]; [P<.001]). Median time to labor onset (in minutes) (240 [120-300] vs 360 [180-600]; P<.001) was also shorter in group 1 (80 mL). The number of doses of misoprostol required for labor induction was statistically significantly less than with 80 mL (mean±standard deviation, 1.4±0.7 vs 2.4±1.3; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mode of delivery (vaginal delivery: 69 vs 80; odds ratio, 0.55 [1.1-0.3]; P=.104 and cesarean delivery: 29 vs 17; odds ratio, 0.99 [0.9-1.1]; P=.063, respectively). The relative risk of delivery within 12 hours with 80 mL was 2.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.43], P<.001. Maternal and neonatal morbidity were similar across the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

FC (80 mL) simultaneously with vaginal misoprostol significantly shortens the induction-delivery interval (P<.001) in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix, as compared with Foley catheter 60 mL and vaginal misoprostol.

A comparison of 30-, 50-, and 60-mL foley catheter balloon volume and time to achieve cervical ripening for labor induction: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial

Background

Cervical ripening is one of the most important determinants of the outcome of induction of labor. The findings of studies on the most efficacious inflatable catheter balloon volume for pre-induction cervical ripening have been inconclusive.

Aim

To compare the efficacy of the use of different intracervical Foley catheter balloon volumes (30-, 50-, and 60-mL) on cervical ripening.

Subjects and Methods

This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial. Two hundred and sixteen women with a Bishop score ≤5 at term were randomly assigned into three groups (1:1:1) to receive an intracervical single size eighteen Foley balloon catheter inflated either with 30-mL (control arm) or 50-mL and 60-mL (intervention arm) of sterile saline which was retained for a duration of 12 h. The primary outcome measures were the mean change in Bishop score and achieving a Bishop score of ≥6 at the twelfth-hour post-Foley catheter balloon insertion.

Results

In the total study population and among nulliparous women, the 50-mL and 60-mL balloons compared with the 30-mL Foley catheter balloon achieved a statistically significantly greater mean change in Bishop scores at the twelfth hour\post-insertion (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001), while the 60-mL balloon compared with the 30-mL and 50-mL balloons achieved statistically significant higher mean change in Bishop scores among multiparous women (P = 0.047 and P = 0.003) and cervical dilatation irrespective of parity (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002), at the twelfth-hour post-insertion. The larger catheter balloons were also associated with a statistically significant greater chance of having an induction to delivery interval of <12 h in nulliparous women P = 0.003.

Conclusion

The findings of this study showed that the larger single Foley catheter balloon volumes (50-mL and 60-mL) aside from being well tolerated and acceptable have the ability to induce faster changes in Bishop score, produce higher cervical dilation, and thus likely reduce significantly the total labor induction process compared to the 30-mL single catheter balloon volume irrespective of parity.

Efficacy of pharmacological and mechanical cervical priming methods for induction of labour and their applicability for outpatient management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of prostaglandins (PG) and Foley catheter (FC) for cervical priming in the outpatient setting. Various methods are available to achieve cervical ripening prior to induction of labour (IOL). In this systematic review, we will report the literature to date, and investigate the efficacy and safety of using the Foley catheter balloon or prostaglandins for cervical ripening, comparing both methods with each other, and discuss the implications of these findings for midwifery led units.

METHODS

English peer-reviewed journals were systematically searched in the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMCARE, EMBASE and CINAHL, for studies investigating cervical ripening using the FC or PGs. Additional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were identified by a manual search. Search terms included: cervix dilatation effacement, cervix ripening, outpatient, ambulatory care, obstetric patients, pharmacological preparations, and Foley catheter. Only RCTs of FC versus PG or either intervention versus placebo or intervention in the in-patient Vs. outpatient setting were included. 15 RCTs were included.

RESULTS

The results of this review show that both FC and PG analogues are equally effective cervical ripening agents. When compared to FC, PGs lead to a reduced requirement for oxytocin augmentation and a shorter intervention to delivery interval. However, PG use is also associated with an increased risk of hyperstimulation, cardiotocographic monitoring abnormalities and negative neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

FC cervical ripening is an effective method of outpatient cervical priming, which is safe, acceptable, and cost-effective and thus has a potential role in both resource-rich and resource-poor countries. With appropriate dosing, some PG analogues also appear to offer similar outcomes.

Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare Foley catheter and controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction in women with one previous cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from December 12, 2018, to May 28, 2019. A total of 78 term women scheduled for labor induction with one previous cesarean delivery who had ripe cervixes, singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and reassuring cardiotocogram were randomized to Foley catheter or dinoprostone insert. The primary outcome was induction-to-delivery interval (in hours) and the secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 100-mm visual analog scale).

RESULTS

Induction-to-delivery intervals were as follows: median 33.5 h (interquartile range [IQR], 26.1-36.2 h) versus 23.5 h (IQR, 12.7-34.5 h) (P = 0.004), and maternal satisfaction on birth process 100-mm visual analog scale was 80 mm (IQR, 64-88 mm) versus 82 mm (IQR, 67-88 mm) (P = 0.919) for the Foley and controlled-release dinoprostone arms, respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 23 of 39 (59%) versus 20 of 39 (51%) (relative risk, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.72]) (P = 0.496) and trial device insertion to removal time mean ± standard deviation was 20.1 ± 7.1 h versus 14.2 ± 7.3 h (P = 0.001) for Foley versus controlled-release dinoprostone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In term women after one previous cesarean delivery with unripe cervixes, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert compared with Foley catheter shortens the induction-to-delivery interval but maternal satisfaction was not significantly increased.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ISRCTN on November 30, 2018, with trial identification number: ISRCTN16957529 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16957529). The first participant was recruited on December 12, 2018.

Guideline No. 432b: Cervical Ripening

OBJECTIVE

This guideline presents evidence and recommendations for cervical ripening and induction of labour. It aims to provide information to birth attendants and pregnant individuals on optimal perinatal care while avoiding unnecessary obstetrical intervention.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant patients.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Consistent interprofessional use of the guideline, appropriate equipment, and trained professional staff enhance safe intrapartum care. Pregnant individuals and their support person(s) should be informed of the benefits and risks of induction of labour.

EVIDENCE

Literature published to March 2022 was reviewed. PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies on cervical ripening and induction of labour. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified by searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

All providers of obstetrical care.

RECOMMANDATIONS

Directive clinique no 432b : Maturation cervicale

OBJECTIF

Présenter des données probantes et des recommandations sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. Fournir de l'information aux professionnels accoucheurs et aux personnes enceintes sur les soins périnataux optimaux et la prévention des interventions obstétricales inutiles.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toutes les patientes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application interprofessionnelle et cohérente de la présente directive, l'équipement adéquat et le personnel compétent améliorent la sécurité des soins per partum. Les personnes enceintes et leurs personnes de soutien doivent être informées des risques et bénéfices du déclenchement artificiel du travail. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée jusqu'en mars 2022 a été passée en revue. Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed, CINAHL et Cochrane Library pour répertorier des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques randomisés et des études observationnelles sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été obtenue à l'aide de recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux.

RECOMMANDATIONS

Evaluating misoprostol and mechanical methods for induction of labour: Scientific Impact Paper No. 68 April 2022

Increasingly, births around the world are started artificially using medications or other methods. This process is known as induction of labour. As it becomes more common, methods are needed to meet the different clinical needs and birth preferences of women. Induction of labour typically includes a combination of the medication dinoprostone inserted into the vagina, artificial rupture of membranes ('releasing the waters'), and synthetic oxytocin (hormone given via a drip). This paper reviews some of the methods less commonly used for induction in the UK, namely a drug called misoprostol, which can be given orally or vaginally, and 'mechanical' methods, where labour is started by stretching the cervix (neck of the womb), most commonly with a soft silicone tube with a balloon near the tip, filled with water. Low-dose oral misoprostol tablets are now commercially available in the UK. Other methods for labour induction are not reviewed in detail in this paper. The evidence suggests mechanical induction of labour (using a balloon catheter) and misoprostol are both at least as safe and effective as using the standard drug, dinoprostone. There is evidence to suggest a balloon catheter may reduce the chance of serious negative outcomes for babies when compared with dinoprostone, and that giving low-dose oral misoprostol results in fewer caesarean births. Where possible and after informed consent, the method of induction of labour should be personalised to suit the individual woman, her clinical condition, and the setting in which she is giving birth. Local contexts and resources also need to be taken into account. To date, research into women's perspectives and experiences of induction of labour have been significantly lacking.

Outpatient Cervical Ripening with Balloon Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether outpatient cervical ripening with a balloon catheter results in a shorter amount of time in the labor and delivery unit when compared with use in the inpatient setting.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception until December 2020. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Using a predefined protocol and search strategy, 1,152 titles were identified and screened. Randomized controlled trials that compared outpatient and inpatient cervical ripening with balloon catheters were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to produce mean difference for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, both with a 95% CI. The primary outcome was the amount of time from admission to the labor ward until delivery. Additional secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Eight trials (740 patients) were included; six studies (571 patients) reported on our primary outcome. Compared with the inpatient group, outpatient balloon cervical ripening was associated with significantly less time in the labor and delivery unit (outpatient 16.3±9.7 hours vs inpatient 23.8±14.0 hours; mean difference -7.24 hours, 95% CI -11.03 to -3.34). There were no differences in total induction time or total hospital admission. The outpatient group was significantly less likely than the inpatient group to undergo cesarean delivery (21% vs 27%), RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59-0.98). There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes. There were no deliveries outside of the hospital and no stillbirths.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient balloon cervical ripening in low-risk patients is associated with a decreased amount of time from admission to labor and delivery until delivery. Outpatient balloon cervical ripening is a safe alternative for low-risk patients and has the potential for significant benefits to patients, and labor and delivery units.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019140503.

Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert compared to foley catheter alone on induction to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction.

METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from December 2018 to May 2019. Term nulliparas with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert simultaneously or Foley catheter alone. Primary outcomes were induction to delivery interval (hours) and maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 11-point Visual Numerical Rating Scale VNRS 0-10, higher score more satisfied).

RESULTS

Induction to vaginal delivery intervals was mean ± standard deviation 22.5 ± 10.4 vs. 35.1 ± 14.9 h, P =  < 0.001 but maternal satisfaction on birth experience was not significantly different median[interquartile range] VNRS 8[7-9] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.12 for Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms, respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 35/102(34.3%) vs. 50/101(49.5%), P = 0.02 RR 0.7 95% CI 0.5-0.9 NNTb 6.3 95% CI 3.5-39.4, pain score at 6 h after catheter insertion 5[2-8] vs. 1[1-3], P < 0.001, Bishop score at trial devices removal 9[9-10] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.001, requirement for oxytocin induction or augmentation 39/102(38.2%) vs. 76/101(75.2%) NNTb 3 95% CI 2.0-4.1, P < 0.001 and amniotomy rates 73/99(73.7%) vs. 81/95(85.3%), P = 0.052 RR 0.9 85% CI 0.8-1.0 in Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms respectively.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparas with unripe cervixes at term, combined Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to Foley catheter alone reduces the induction to vaginal delivery interval and cesarean delivery rate but satisfaction was not significantly increased.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN2282883, 03/12/2018, "prospectively registered" ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12282883 ).

American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor

Induction of labor is an increasingly common component of intrapartum care in the United States. This rise is fueled by a nationwide escalation in both medically indicated and elective inductions at or beyond term, supported by recent research showing some benefits of induction over expectant management. However, induction of labor medicalizes the birth experience and may lead to a complex cascade of interventions. The purpose of this Clinical Bulletin is twofold: (1) to guide clinicians on the use of person-centered decision-making when discussing induction of labor and (2) to review evidence-based practice recommendations for intrapartum midwifery care during labor induction.

Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate

BACKGROUND

A favorable Simplified Bishop Score (>5) before the induction of labor is associated with successful vaginal birth. Patients with an unfavorable Simplified Bishop Score (≤5) undergo cervical ripening before the administration of oxytocin. However, data are limited regarding the utility of the Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if the Simplified Bishop Score before oxytocin induction but after cervical ripening is associated with cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing induction of labor from the Consortium on Safe Labor. The patients with a singleton term pregnancy who initially underwent cervical ripening were included. Those with a history of cesarean delivery were excluded. The outcomes of patients with a favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening were compared with those with an unfavorable Simplified Bishop Score. The primary outcome was the mode of birth. A log-binomial regression was performed to calculate the relative risk and control for confounders such as admission Simplified Bishop Score and parity.

RESULTS

A total of 5807 patients met the criteria to be included in the study. 4235 (73%) patients had a favorable cervix, and 1572 (27%) patients had an unfavorable cervix after cervical ripening. The favorable group had a decreased rate of cesarean delivery than the unfavorable group (risk ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.40). Both the groups had low rates of maternal chorioamnionitis, though the patients with an unfavorable cervix were at a higher risk. There was no significant difference in the rates of postpartum hemorrhage or neonatal intensive care unit admission. Lower rates of cesarean delivery among the favorable group persisted when stratifying by parity (nulliparous: risk ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.43; multiparous: risk ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.36). After controlling for maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index, parity, gestational age, and Simplified Bishop Score at admission, a favorable cervix remained significantly associated with fewer cesarean births (risk ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.66).

CONCLUSION

In women undergoing labor induction, a favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening and before the start of oxytocin is associated with a decreased rate of cesarean delivery, even after adjusting for parity and Simplified Bishop Score at admission. Moreover, the Simplified Bishop Score assigned after cervical ripening could be used to inform the timing of oxytocin initiation. However, further research is necessary to determine the ideal endpoint of cervical ripening.

Outpatient labour induction

The inexorable rise in induction rates over the past two decades, in parallel with increasing medical costs and pressure to reduce length of stay, has led to marked logistic difficulties for health care workers, managers and planners. Maternity services are being overwhelmed by the need to allocate staff and delivery suite space for the scheduling and undertaking of induction processes, rather than focussing care for women in spontaneous labour. Induction of labour according to the majority of current protocols and guidelines necessitates increased length of stay and relatively aggressive use of oxytocin (to reduce the time expended in the labour ward from artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) to establishment of labour). This increased oxytocin usage requires increased use of continuous electronic foetal monitoring, and may also increase epidural usage, further increasing the complexity of labour for the woman and her health care workers. Outpatient care after cervical priming and even outpatient care after AROM may help to ease these pressures and may reduce the medicalisation of the birth experience when induction is indicated, with a potential to reduce oxytocin use and associated interventions. If the period between cervical priming to AROM is managed as outpatient care, then the woman may be able to find better psychological and social support at home, as well as maintain autonomy and get better rest prior to the onset of labour. Inpatient AROM could also be followed by outpatient care until the pregnant person returns to the hospital, either in spontaneous labour, or for initiation of syntocinon after 12-18 h. High-quality research has already demonstrated that outpatient care for cervical ripening is acceptable to mothers and caregivers, has economic benefits and has an acceptable safety profile in appropriately selected low-risk inductions.

Towards an evidence-based approach to optimize the success of labour induction

Induction of labour is a two-step process involving cervical ripening and the initiation of uterine contractions, with the goal of achieving vaginal birth. To optimize the chance of a safe and timely vaginal birth, the process of induction of labour should be evidence based and individualized to the given person and situation. In this study, we lay out a framework for how this should be done, emphasizing on careful clinical assessment and planning, flexibility in the strategy of induction, patience during the ripening and latent phases of labour, and thoughtful consideration regarding changing the strategy if active labour is not initially achieved. The goal of this review is to present the current evidence on this topic in the form of a user-friendly protocol that can be easily adapted to institutional practice.

Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Multiparous labor inductions are typically successful, and the process can be rapid, starting from a ripened cervix with a predictable response to amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. Outpatient Foley catheter labor induction in multiparas with unripe cervixes is a feasible option as the mechanical process of ripening is usually without significant uterine contractions and well tolerated. Labor contractions can be initiated by amniotomy and titrated oxytocin infusion in the hospital for well-timed births during working hours as night birth are associated with adverse events. We sought to evaluate outpatient compared with inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas for births during working hours and maternal satisfaction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in the University of Malaya Medical Center. A total of 163 term multiparas (no dropouts) with unripe cervixes (Bishop score ≤5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to outpatient or inpatient Foley catheter. Primary outcomes were delivery during "working hours" 08:00-18:00 h and maternal satisfaction on allocated care (assessed by 11-point visual numerical rating score 0-10, with higher score indicating more satisfied).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13534944.

RESULTS

Comparing outpatient and inpatient arms, delivery during working hours were 54/82 (65.9%) vs. 48/81 (59.3%) (relative risk 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4, p = 0.421) and median maternal satisfaction visual numerical rating score was 9 (interquartile range 9-9) vs. 9 (interquartile range 8-9, p = 0.134), repectively. Duration of hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shorter in the outpatient arm: 35.8 ± 20.2 vs. 45.2 ± 16.2 h (p = 0.001) and 4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 5.3 ± 3.6 h (p = 0.020), respectively. Other maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial failed to demonstrate the anticipated increase in births during working hours with outpatient compared with inpatient induction of labor with Foley catheter in parous women with an unripe cervix. Hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shortened in the outpatient group. The rate of maternal satisfaction was high in both groups and no significant differences were found.

Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction

Induction of labor is increasingly a common component of the intrapartum care. Knowledge of the current evidence on methods of labor induction is an essential component of shared decision-making to determine which induction method meets an individual's health needs and personal preferences. This article provides a review of the current research evidence on labor induction methods, including cervical ripening techniques, and contraction stimulation techniques. Current evidence about expected duration of labor following induction, use of the Bishop score to guide induction, and guidance on the use of combination methods for labor induction are reviewed.

Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent evidence supports elective induction of labor after 39 weeks; however, labor induction in patients with an unfavorable cervix, a Bishop score less than 6, may take several days. In this review, we focus on the efficacy and safety of methods of labor induction for the unfavorable cervix.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence on the use of mechanical cervical preparation with transcervical balloons suggests balloons are the most effective option for decreasing time to delivery in the nulliparous patient. Single and double balloons are equally effective, with a volume of more 30 ml being more effective. The addition of misoprostol or oxytocin concurrently with a balloon further expedites time to delivery.

SUMMARY

Mechanical dilation should be considered when available and technically possible for labor induction in patients with an unfavorable cervix. Misoprostol is an effective adjunct to trans-cervical balloons, further decreasing time to delivery as compared with balloon alone. When misoprostol is contraindicated, oxytocin is a safe, effective, alternative adjunct to trans-cervical balloons. More research is needed to evaluate safe outpatient options, induction methods in the setting of prior cesarean with an unfavorable cervix, and to directly compare misoprostol with oxytocin as adjuncts to transcervical balloons.

Changes in local protocols on inpatient cervical priming and introduction of outpatient priming: A nationwide survey in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study are to assess (changes in) local procedures for inpatient cervical priming as part of induction of labor and to identify the implementation of outpatient cervical priming in the Netherlands.

METHODS

This survey study was conducted from October 2019 until January 2020; obstetricians of all 72 hospitals with a maternity unit in the Netherlands received a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: basic hospital data, local protocol on methods of inpatient induction of labor (IPI), local protocol for outpatient induction of labor (OPI).

RESULTS

A response was received from 66/72 hospitals, giving a response rate of 92%. For IPI the most preferred method was a Foley catheter (87.9%), 27.6% protocols switched to prostaglandins after day 1 if the cervix was not ripe yet. A prostaglandin gel or pessary was not the preferred method on day 1 but only used after 24 h in 5 hospitals (7.6%). OPI was offered in 53% (35/66 hospitals), all using a Foley catheter.

CONCLUSION

In the Netherlands, local protocols for IPI have shifted towards the use of a Foley catheter. More than half of the hospitals offer OPI. As safety and efficacy data of OPI are lacking, research on this topic is urgently warranted.

Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness and potential harms of cervical ripening in the outpatient compared with the inpatient setting, or different methods of ripening in the outpatient setting alone.

DATA SOURCES

Searches for articles in English included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists (up to August 2020).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Using predefined criteria and DistillerSR software, 10,853 citations were dual-reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies of outpatient cervical ripening using prostaglandins and mechanical methods in pregnant women at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Using prespecified criteria, study data abstraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and strength of evidence was assessed. We included 30 RCTs and 10 cohort studies (N=9,618) most generalizable to women aged 25-30 years with low-risk pregnancies. All findings were low or insufficient strength of evidence and not statistically significant. Incidence of cesarean delivery was not different for any comparison of inpatient and outpatient settings, or comparisons of different methods in the outpatient setting (most evidence available for single-balloon catheters and dinoprostone). Harms were inconsistently reported or inadequately defined. Differences were not found for neonatal infection (eg, sepsis) with outpatient compared with inpatient dinoprostone, birth trauma (eg, cephalohematoma) with outpatient compared with inpatient single-balloon catheter, shoulder dystocia with outpatient dinoprostone compared with placebo, maternal infection (eg, chorioamnionitis) with outpatient compared with inpatient single-balloon catheters or outpatient prostaglandins compared with placebo, and postpartum hemorrhage with outpatient catheter compared with inpatient dinoprostone. Evidence on misoprostol, hygroscopic dilators, and other outcomes (eg, perinatal mortality and time to vaginal birth) was insufficient.

CONCLUSION

In women with low-risk pregnancies, outpatient cervical ripening with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheters did not increase cesarean deliveries. Although there were no clear differences in harms when comparing outpatient with inpatient cervical ripening, the certainty of evidence is low or insufficient to draw definitive conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020167406.

Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter (DBC) with vaginal prostaglandin (PGE) for induction of labour (IOL).

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled study of 420 patients from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017 to evaluate the use of DBC in IOL in an Asian population looking at the adverse effects in the first 12 h after insertion. Women were assigned randomly to cervical ripening with either a DBC or a prostaglandin pessary. The adverse events in the 12 h after DBC or first prostaglandin inserted, the efficacy of a DBC to a prostaglandin in labour induction and maternal satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significantly less women with uterine hyperstimulation in the DBC (2 vs 24, p ≤ 0.0001) compared to the prostaglandin group. There were no women with uterine hyperstimulation and non-reassuring foetal status in the DBC while there were 5 women with uterine hyperstimulation and foetal distress in the prostaglandin group. Use of entonox was significantly less in the DBC group (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in both groups in caesarean section, vaginal deliveries and time to delivery, although significant less time was needed to achieve cervical os dilation more than 4 cm in the DBC group (p ≤ 0.0001). Neonatal birth outcomes were similar. Women's pain scores were similar for both methods. 80.1% of women allocated the DBC and 76.8% of women allocated the PGE were keen to recommend their method of induction.

CONCLUSION

Double balloon catheter remains a good alternative method for inducing women in view of a good safety profile with low risk of hyperstimulation and high maternal satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02620215.

Massive antepartum haemorrhage at insertion of Foley balloon catheter for induction of labour

Induction of labour using a balloon catheter is common practice throughout the world, often used in high-risk pregnancies due to the improved safety profile for the fetus compared with pharmacological methods. This report outlines the case of a 2500 mL antepartum haemorrhage on placement of a Foley catheter through the cervix at a secondary obstetric unit in New Zealand. An emergency caesarean section was carried out 20 min after the bleeding onset. No obvious cause for the bleeding was identified at caesarean. The mother required a blood transfusion, but otherwise, did well clinically; the infant required resuscitation at birth and went on to suffer a left middle cerebral artery stroke. At 6 months, he is assumed to have recovered with no long-term sequelae. A literature review has highlighted this was an unprecedented event. We hope to raise awareness of this rare catastrophic adverse outcome given the prevalence of balloon catheter induction.

Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?

As the number of labor inductions in high-income countries has steadily risen, hospital costs and the additional burden on obstetric staff have also increased. Outpatient induction of labor is therefore becoming increasingly important. It has been estimated that 20 - 50% of all pregnant women requiring induction would be eligible for outpatient induction. The use of balloon catheters in patients with an unripe cervix has been shown to be an effective and safe method of cervical priming. Balloon catheters are as effective as the vaginal administration of prostaglandin E 2 or oral misoprostol. The advantage of using a balloon catheter is that it avoids uterine hyperstimulation and monitoring is less expensive. This makes balloon catheters a suitable option for outpatient cervical ripening. Admittedly, intravenous administration of oxytocin to induce or augment labor is required in approximately 75% of cases. Balloon catheters are not associated with a higher risk of maternal and neonatal infection compared to vaginal PGE 2 . Low-risk pregnancies (e.g., post-term pregnancies, gestational diabetes) are suitable for outpatient cervical ripening with a balloon catheter. The data for high-risk pregnancies are still insufficient. The following conditions are recommended when considering an outpatient approach: strict selection of appropriate patients (singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, intact membranes), CTG monitoring for 20 - 40 minutes after balloon placement, the patient must be given detailed instructions about the indications for immediate readmission to hospital, and 24-hour phone access to the hospital must be ensured. According to reviewed studies, the balloon catheter remained in place between 12 hours ("overnight") and 24 hours. The most common reason for readmission to hospital was expulsion of the balloon catheter. The advantages of outpatient versus inpatient induction of cervical ripening with a balloon catheter were the significantly shorter hospital stay, the lower costs, and higher patient satisfaction, with both procedures having been shown to be equally effective. Complication rates (e.g., vaginal bleeding, severe pain, uterine hyperstimulation syndrome) during the cervical ripening phase are low (0.3 - 1.5%); severe adverse outcomes (e.g., placental abruption) have not been reported. Compared to inpatient induction of labor using vaginal PGE 2 , outpatient cervical ripening using a balloon catheter had a lower rate of deliveries/24 hours and a significantly higher need for oxytocin; however, hospital stay was significantly shorter, frequency of pain during the cervical ripening phase was significantly lower, and patients' duration of sleep was longer. A randomized controlled study comparing outpatient cervical priming with a balloon catheter with outpatient or inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol would be of clinical interest.

Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter in nulliparous women undergoing elective labor induction shortens the time from admission to delivery.

METHODS

We performed a randomized controlled trial of patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation or more with a modified Bishop score less than 5. Women were randomized 1:1 to outpatient or inpatient transcervical Foley. In the outpatient group, the Foley was inserted the day before admission for scheduled induction; insertion was performed at scheduled admission in the inpatient group. The primary outcome was duration of time from admission to the labor and delivery unit to delivery. With 80% power and a two-sided α of 0.05, a sample size of 126 was estimated to detect at least a 5-hour mean difference in time from admission to delivery between groups from a baseline duration of 19±10 hours.

RESULTS

From May 2018 to October 2019, 126 women were randomized, 63 in each group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except that body mass index (31±5.4 vs 34±7.5, P=.01) and group B streptococcus colonization (31% vs 54%, P=.01) were lower in the outpatient group. The time from admission to delivery was shorter in the outpatient group (17.4±7.4 vs 21.7±9.1 hours, P<.01, mean difference 4.3 hours, 95% CI 1.3-7.2). Admissions before scheduled induction were higher in the outpatient group (22% vs 5%, relative risk [RR] 4.7, 95% CI 1.4-15.4, P<.01), as was median modified Bishop score on admission (3 vs 1, P<.01). Cesarean delivery (24% vs 32%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.3, P=.32) and chorioamnionitis (22% vs 13%, RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-3.9, P=.16) were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparous patients undergoing elective labor induction at term, outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter reduced the time from admission to delivery.

CLINCAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03472937.

Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter - A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting

INTRODUCTION

Approximately every fourth labor is induced. In Finland, when labor is induced, it is commonly carried out with a catheter in the inpatient (IP) setting. However, in uncomplicated, full-term pregnancies, induction of labor (IOL) in the outpatient (OP) setting is also possible. Nevertheless, there is only a limited amount of information about the experiences of IOL in OP setting. Our study compared the experiences of catheter IOL in OP and IP settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized study, including 113 women with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies with planned IOL. After catheter insertion, women were randomized into OP or IP settings: after dropouts, there were 53 women in the OP group and 54 in the IP. The experiences of IOL were evaluated with three sets of visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires: the general experience questionnaire (eight questions), the concurrent induction experience questionnaire (1, 5, 9, 13 hours; nine questions) and the postpartum experience questionnaire (14 questions).

RESULTS

Both groups had low VAS scores, indicating good experiences of IOL. Women in the OP group were less satisfied (mean VAS difference Δ = 7.8, P = .015) and more anxious (Δ = 4.8, P = .008) than were women in the IP group. In the course of the IOL, all women became less satisfied (Δ = 8.4, P = .001), had more contraction pain (Δ = 8.9, P = .020) and had a higher frequency of contractions (Δ = 9.9, P = .004) but they were more relaxed and experienced less fear (Δ = 6.9, P = .036, Δ = 5.3, P = .001, respectively). There was no interaction between group and time. According to the postpartum experience questionnaire, both groups had a similar good general experience of IOL (P = .736) but the OP group had more fear (Δ = 9.5, P = .009) and was more anxious (Δ = 9.0, P = .007). Most of the women would choose catheter IOL in a subsequent pregnancy (OP 82.6%, IP 87.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The women in the OP setting were less satisfied and more anxious than were the women in the IP setting. However, the differences were marginal and the general experience after IOL was good. IOL in an OP setting is thus a viable option in low-risk full-term pregnancies. Therefore, when using catheter IOL, both setting options should be available.

Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term

Labor induction is commonly used for achieving successful vaginal delivery. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of dinoprostone and Cook's balloon as labor-inducing agents in primipara women at term. A retrospective cohort study among primipara women was conducted in Hubei Maternity and Child Health Hospital. Basic clinical characteristics were collected. The main outcomes were vaginal delivery rate, cesarean section rate and forceps delivery rate. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were also compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were further performed to evaluate the predictors for vaginal delivery within 24 h. A total of 845 eligible primipara women undergoing labor induction were recruited. Of them, 141 women were induced with dinoprostone (dinoprostone group, DG), and 704 with Cook's balloon (Cook's balloon group, CG). Groups were homogeneous except more women with premature rupture of membranes in DG, with gestational hypertension in CG (P<0.05). The vaginal delivery rate within 12 h was 1.98% and 16.52% in CG and DG respectively (P=0.0001). Besides, the vaginal delivery rate within 24 h was 37.62% and 52.26% in CG and DG respectively (P=0.0079). DG showed the lower rate of oxytocin augmentation, artificial rupture of membrane and postpartum hemorrhage and the shorter interval from insertion to active labor than CG (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that abortion history, oxytocin augmentation, artificial rupture of membrane, and obstetric analgesia were independent predictors for vaginal delivery within 24 h. In conclusion, dinoprostone was more effective than Cook's balloon to induce labor and achieve vaginal birth in the sample of primipara women at term.

Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening

INTRODUCTION

Induction of labor is a common obstetric intervention. For women requiring cervical ripening, the current standard practice of inpatient labor induction can be long and challenging. Outpatient cervical ripening may be a safe and beneficial option for a select subset of low-risk pregnant women.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched with specific criteria to select articles for review. The review covered literature on the safety, efficacy and acceptability of outpatient cervical ripening in the low-risk population.

DISCUSSION

Pharmacological and mechanical cervical ripening agents have been trialed in the outpatient setting. Mechanical ripening is safer than pharmacological priming, and there appears to be no disadvantage to offering outpatient catheter balloon cervical ripening to appropriately screened women who require this intervention prior to labor induction. Maternal and midwifery acceptability of outpatient care further support outpatient cervical ripening for women with low-risk pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

The balloon catheter appears to be the optimal method for outpatient cervical ripening, but further prospective studies are required to ensure safety and benefit before it can be routinely offered to low-risk women.

Evidence-based labor management: induction of labor (part 2)

Induction of labor is indicated for many obstetrical, maternal, and fetal indications. Induction can be offered for pregnancy at 39 weeks' gestation. No prediction method is considered sensitive or specific enough to determine the incidence of cesarean delivery after induction. A combination of 60- to 80-mL single-balloon Foley catheter for 12 hours and either 25-μg oral misoprostol initially, followed by 25 μg every 2-4 hours, or 50 μg every 4-6 hours (if no more than 3 contractions per 10 minutes or previous uterine surgery), or oxytocin infusion should be recommended for induction of labor. Adding membrane stripping at the beginning of induction should be considered. Once 5-6 cm of cervical dilation is achieved during the induction of labor, consideration can be given to discontinue oxytocin infusion if in use at that time and adequate contractions are present. Induction with oxytocin immediately (as soon as feasible) or up to 12 hours of term prelabor rupture of membranes if labor is not evident is recommended. Outpatient Foley ripening can be considered for low-risk women. Cesarean delivery should not be performed before 15 hours of oxytocin infusion and amniotomy if feasible and ideally after 18-24 hours of oxytocin infusion.

Outpatient versus inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare between outpatient and inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction.

METHODS

We searched in four different databases for the available trials during May 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outpatient to inpatient balloon catheter for induction of labor. We extracted the available data from the included studies and pooled them in meta-analysis using RevMan software. The dichotomous data were pooled as risk ratio (RR) and the continuous data were pooled as mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).Our primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Our secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, Bishop score, and different adverse events including postpartum hemorrhage, Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes, and chorioamnionitis.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with a total number of 740patients were included. The cesarean delivery rate was significantly reduced among outpatient balloon catheter compared to inpatient balloon catheter (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.46, 0.86], p = 0.004). Outpatient balloon catheter was associated with shorter hospital stay duration in comparison with inpatient group (MD= -0.38, 95% CI [-0.61, -0.14], p = 0.002). Outpatient group was linked to a more favorable increase in Bishop score (MD = 0.88, 95% CI [0.78, 0.98], p>0.001). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding different adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient balloon catheter priming is safe and effective in reducing cesarean delivery rates and shortening the length of hospital stay with a better Bishop score.

Retrospective Comparison of PGE2 Vaginal Insert and Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two methods of outpatient cervical ripening (CR): an intracervical Foley catheter and a prostaglandin E₂ (PGE)₂ slow-release vaginal insert.

METHODS

All records of women receiving outpatient CR at a tertiary care hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared time from insertion of first CR agent until delivery between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, multiple gestation, or contraindication to either CR method. Secondary outcomes included time from removal of agent and time from admission until delivery, additional CR used, uterine tachysystole, labour and delivery complications, type of delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included (82 Foley; 71 PGE₂). Baseline characteristics were comparable except for lower dilation in the PGE₂ group (16% vs. 38% <1cm dilated; P < 0.05). In the CPH model, time from insertion to delivery was not different between PGE₂ and Foley catheter groups (median 27 vs. 33 h), controlling for parity, gestational age, initial dilation, and use of oxytocin (HR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.68). Patients in the PGE₂ group were more likely to experience uterine tachysystole (9% vs. 0%; P < 0.01) and require another method of CR (34% vs. 1%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in neonatal or maternal adverse outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that outpatient Foley catheter and PGE₂ CR are comparable in time from insertion to delivery; however, PGE₂ inserts are associated with higher rates of tachysystole and the need for second CR method. A prospective study is warranted to further investigate these findings.

Induction of labor, and physiological and psychological stress responses as expressed by salivary cortisol: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To describe patterns of physiological and psychological stress during induced labor and their correlation to obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study included 167 women, with low-risk, singleton pregnancies, who delivered at term, at a tertiary academic center from 2015 through 2018. Among them, 72 (43%) underwent induction and 95 (57%) had spontaneous labor onset. Physiological stress was evaluated by salivary cortisol measurements and emotional stress by questionnaires (visual analogue stress scale 0-10) during latent phase, active phase and full dilation stages of labor, as well as 2 min and 2 h postpartum. Cord blood cortisol and pH were obtained. Stress patterns were compared between parturients who did or did not undergo induction. Modes of delivery, labor and delivery complications, and early neonatal outcomes were compared. Mothers completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Induced women had lower cortisol concentrations during the latent phase compared to spontaneous onset of labor (p = 0.003), with no differences during active (p = 0.237), full dilation (0.668), 2 min and 2 h after delivery (p = 0.666). Stress scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were similar between groups. Cord cortisol (p = 0.294), 1-min Apgar score ≤ 7 (p = 0.502) and 5-min Apgar score ≤ 7 (p = 0.37) were similar. All had cord pH > 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction does not increase stress during labor. Moreover, it might have a positive effect on reducing cortisol during the latent phase. These findings might reassure women who are concerned about induction of labor.

Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial

Background

Approximately one in four pregnant women undergo an induction of labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness for mothers and babies of two methods of cervical ripening – inpatient care for women starting induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 hormones, or allowing women to go home for 18 to 24 h after starting induction with a single-balloon catheter.

Methods/design

This is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible pregnant women, with a live singleton baby in a cephalic presentation who undergo a planned induction of labour at term, will be randomised to outpatient balloon-catheter induction or in-hospital prostaglandin induction. The primary outcome is caesarean section rate. To detect a 24% relative risk reduction in caesarean rate from a baseline of 24.8%, with 80% power and 5% type 1 error, will require 1552 participants in a one to one ratio.

Discussion

If outpatient balloon-catheter induction reduces caesarean section rates, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in induction of labour practice around the world. We think that home-based balloon-catheter induction will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred labour-induction care package for pregnant women.

Trial registration

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN: 12616000739415. Registered on 6 June 2016.

The effect of maternal body mass index on duration of induced labor

INTRODUCTION

Obese primiparous women with induction of labor are at high risk for a cesarean section. There are contradictory results regarding time in induced labor in relation to maternal body mass index (BMI). It is important to characterize the course of induced labor to prevent unnecessary cesarean section. We aimed to evaluate whether the duration of labor was associated with maternal BMI in primiparous women with induction of labor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national retrospective cohort study, including 15 259 primiparae with a single term pregnancy, admitted for induction of labor from January 2014 to August 2017. Data were obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Registry. Cox regression analyses were used to illustrate the association between BMI and active labor and between BMI and time from admission until start of active labor.

RESULTS

Duration of active labor was shorter in underweight women and prolonged in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² compared with women in other BMI classes, illustrated by Cox regression graphs (P < .001). The median durations of active labor in underweight women were 6.1 and 7.4 hours in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . The time from admission until start of active labor increased with maternal BMI, illustrated by Cox regression graphs (P < .001) and the median duration increased from 12.9 hours in underweight women to 22.6 hours in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . The cesarean section rate in active labor increased significantly with BMI (P < .001) from 7.4% in underweight women to 22.0% in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . Obese and normal weight women had similar rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery (69.9% in the total study population).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of active labor was associated with maternal BMI for underweight women and women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . Although women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² who reached the active phase of labor had the same chance for a spontaneous vaginal delivery as normal weight women, the duration of active labor and the cesarean section rate were increased. The time from admission until start of active labor increased successively with maternal BMI.

Foley catheter for induction of labour: a UK observational study

We conducted a prospective observational study of all inductions using Foley's catheter at our center between 2016 and 2018. Outcome data collected included induction to delivery time, mode of delivery, complication rates, patient and staff satisfaction. Ninety-nine women were included in our study. Median induction to delivery time was 28.3 h (IQR 19.7-34 h), 20 (20.2%) women required Caesarean section. No relevant complications were recorded. Patients and staff were satisfied with the technique overall.These results show transcervical Foley's catheter is a safe and effective method of induction of labour in the UK setting. It was shown to be feasible in the outpatient and previous Caesarean section groups.Impact statementWhat is already known on the subject? Foley catheter as an induction agent has already been shown to be as clinically effective as slow release prostaglandins with lower costs.What do the results of this study add? No study has been published on its use for routine inductions in the UK. Our results show that Foley's catheter is a safe, effective method for inducing labour in the UK.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This suggests this technique should be implemented more widely in the UK.

Affordable and low-maintenance obstetric devices

OBJECTIVE

Adequate obstetric care requires the availability of essential diagnostic and management equipment; however, for centers with budget restrictions, the acquisition and maintenance of these devices can pose major challenges. The purpose of the present paper is to disseminate knowledge about the availability of affordable and low-maintenance obstetric devices, which might help to save lives in low- and medium-resource countries.

METHOD

Over the course of 2015-2018, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee acquired information from different clinical and commercial sources regarding the availability of affordable and low-maintenance essential obstetric devices.

RESULTS

The Committee identified several devices that met the criteria of low cost and ease of maintenance: a winding handheld Doppler device for intermittent auscultation; a portable continuous fetal heart rate monitor; a validated semi-automated blood pressure monitor; the Foley catheter balloon for labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervix; reusable metal and plastic vacuum cups and manual pumps; an intrauterine tamponade balloon; and the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment.

CONCLUSION

Several affordable and low-maintenance obstetric devices are currently available that offer the potential to save lives in resource-constrained settings.

Efficiency of the Foley catheter versus the double balloon catheter during the induction of second trimester pregnancy terminations: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare induction-to-delivery intervals of Foley catheters and double balloon catheters in second trimester pregnancy terminations.

METHODS

This randomized parallel study was conducted on women who underwent second trimester terminations between December 2016 and December 2017. Pregnant women in the second trimester with a Bishop score < 6 were included in the study. Participants were randomized into two groups, the first being the Foley catheter group and the second being the double balloon catheter group. The time frames from insertion of catheters to the delivery were recorded in each group. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to examine the contribution of factors to the induction-to-delivery interval. A survival analysis was conducted to compare the Foley method and the double balloon method.

RESULTS

A total of 91 pregnant women were included in the final analysis. The induction-to-delivery interval was shorter in the Foley catheter group than in the double balloon catheter group (38 h 54 min ± 21 h 6 min versus 58 h 17 min ± 25 h 56 min). We also found that women with intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) had a shorter time to delivery compared to women with live fetuses (39 h 12 min ± 18 h 46 min vs 51 h 30 min ± 26 h 42 min, p = 0.04). Women with a history of vaginal delivery also had a shorter induction-to-delivery time compared to women who never delivered vaginally before (38 h 12 min ± 17 h 42 min vs 53 h 54 min ± 27 h 18 min, p = 0.004). In the multiple regression analysis, the most significant contributor to the induction-to-delivery time was the method used for induction of labor and followed by other factors including the viability of the fetus (live/IUFD), history of vaginal delivery and PPROM. The survival analysis showed that the induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the Foley catheter group than in the double balloon catheter group (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.57-4.00, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During the termination of second trimester pregnancies time from induction of labor to delivery is shorter with the Foley catheter compared to double balloon catheter.